Knowledge

Pulsifer v. United States

Source đź“ť

248: 504:, regardless of any statutory minimum sentences. Criteria for qualification are listed in § 3553(f)(1) through (5). Subsections (f)(2) through (f)(4) focus on the crime for which the defendant will be sentences, subsection (f)(5) focuses on the defendant's cooperation with the government, and subsection (f)(1) focuses on the defendant's prior criminal record. This subsection states that courts must impose sentences pursuant to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines if it finds that: 63: 22: 165: 548:
of fifteen years, unless he qualified for safety valve relief. Neither Pulsifer nor the United States disputed that Pulsifer met the requirements of § 3553(f)(2) through (f)(5). Turning to (f)(1), it is also undisputed that Pulsifer's prior criminal record triggers subsections (A) and (B), but that
326:
Whether a defendant satisfies the criteria in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) as amended by the First Step Act of 2018 in order to qualify for the federal drug-sentencing “safety valve” provision so long as he does not have (a) more than four criminal history points, (b) a three-point offense, and (c) a
499:
The federal sentencing statute, 18 U.S.C. 3553, contains a provision known as a "safety valve". The safety valve, located at § 3553(f), requires the trial courts to sentence qualifying defendants according to the
614:. Oral arguments were heard on October 2, 2023. The case was argued by Shay Dvoretzky, on behalf of Pulsifer, and Frederick Liu, from the Solicitor General’s office on behalf of the United States. 41: 537: 654: 175: 549:
subsection (C) is not triggered. At sentencing, Pulsifer argued that he is eligible for safety valve relief because his prior conduct does not trigger (A), (B),
513:(A) more than 4 criminal history points, excluding any criminal history points resulting from a 1–point offense, as determined under the sentencing guidelines; 84: 77: 186: 127: 807: 35: 99: 812: 106: 817: 596:
Circuits, a defendant is eligible for safety value relief unless his prior criminal record satisfies subsections (A), (B),
576:
Circuits, a defendant is eligible for safety valve relief unless his prior criminal record satisfies subsections (A), (B),
113: 544:, contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Since Pulsifer had previously been convicted of a serious drug felony, he faced a 474: 450: 339: 252: 95: 222: 204: 146: 49: 608:
On October 7, 2022, Pulsifer petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his case. On February 27, 2023, the Court granted
327:
two-point offense, or whether the defendant satisfies the criteria so long as he does not have (a), (b), or (c).
501: 280: 469: 718: 545: 120: 337:
A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under
182: 179:
that states a Knowledge editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
553:(C). The District Court disagreed, saying that a defendant whose prior record triggers (A), (B), 73: 750: 694: 764: 414: 8: 788: 700: 309: 478: 454: 343: 406: 770: 522:(C) a prior 2–point violent offense, as determined under the sentencing guidelines; 541: 402: 382: 370: 483: 801: 564:
Courts of appeals are split on how to read the "and" in § 3553(f)(1). In the
516:(B) a prior 3–point offense, as determined under the sentencing guidelines; 394: 378: 362: 631: 533: 390: 347:
only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three conditions.
290: 610: 573: 62: 593: 589: 585: 581: 569: 565: 558: 313: 482:, a provision of the federal sentencing statute as amended by the 247: 538:
United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
431:
Kagan, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, Barrett
176:
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
540:
to one count of distributing at least fifty grams of
735:, 52 F.4th 640 (5th Cir. 2022). 683:, 60 F.4th 230 (4th Cir. 2023). 557:(C) is not eligible for safety valve relief. The 799: 561:affirmed the judgment of the District Court. 468:, (Docket No. 22-340), is a decision of the 50:Learn how and when to remove these messages 223:Learn how and when to remove this message 205:Learn how and when to remove this message 147:Learn how and when to remove this message 800: 83:Please improve this article by adding 527: 439:Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor, Jackson 235:2024 United States Supreme Court case 158: 56: 15: 494: 13: 721: (11th Cir. 2022)(en banc) 647: 253:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 829: 808:United States Supreme Court cases 617: 271:Mark E. Pulsifer v. United States 31:This article has multiple issues. 603: 508:(1) the defendant does not have— 246: 163: 61: 20: 39:or discuss these issues on the 813:2024 in United States case law 776: 756: 738: 724: 706: 686: 672: 1: 640: 502:Federal Sentencing Guidelines 489: 85:secondary or tertiary sources 818:United States sentencing law 7: 470:United States Supreme Court 96:"Pulsifer v. United States" 10: 834: 732:United States v. Palomares 632:Oyez (oral argument audio) 546:mandatory minimum sentence 791: (8th Cir. 2022). 784:United States v. Pulsifer 773: (7th Cir. 2022). 753: (6th Cir. 2022). 703: (9th Cir. 2021). 625:Pulsifer v. United States 465:Pulsifer v. United States 448: 443: 435: 427: 422: 356: 351: 336: 331: 325: 320: 306:United States v. Pulsifer 301: 296: 286: 276: 266: 259: 245: 241:Pulsifer v. United States 240: 746:United States v. Haynes 714:United States v. Garcon 655:"Brief for Petitioners" 695:United States v. Lopez 680:United States v. Jones 525: 262:Decided March 15, 2024 260:Argued October 2, 2023 185:by rewriting it in an 72:relies excessively on 789:39 F.4th 1018 765:United States v. Pace 751:55 F.4th 1075 719:54 F.4th 1274 506: 415:Ketanji Brown Jackson 771:48 F.4th 741 701:998 F.3d 431 321:Questions presented 308:, 39 F.4th 627:is available from: 528:Factual background 367:Associate Justices 187:encyclopedic style 174:is written like a 479:§ 3553(f)(1) 461: 460: 455:§ 3553(f)(1) 407:Amy Coney Barrett 344:§ 3553(f)(1) 233: 232: 225: 215: 214: 207: 157: 156: 149: 131: 54: 825: 792: 786: 780: 774: 768: 760: 754: 748: 742: 736: 734: 728: 722: 716: 710: 704: 698: 690: 684: 682: 676: 670: 669: 667: 665: 659: 651: 636: 630: 495:Legal background 481: 457: 352:Court membership 346: 250: 249: 238: 237: 228: 221: 210: 203: 199: 196: 190: 167: 166: 159: 152: 145: 141: 138: 132: 130: 89: 65: 57: 46: 24: 23: 16: 833: 832: 828: 827: 826: 824: 823: 822: 798: 797: 796: 795: 782: 781: 777: 762: 761: 757: 744: 743: 739: 730: 729: 725: 712: 711: 707: 692: 691: 687: 678: 677: 673: 663: 661: 657: 653: 652: 648: 643: 634: 628: 620: 606: 542:methamphetamine 530: 509: 497: 492: 473: 449: 405: 403:Brett Kavanaugh 393: 383:Sonia Sotomayor 381: 371:Clarence Thomas 338: 261: 255: 236: 229: 218: 217: 216: 211: 200: 194: 191: 183:help improve it 180: 168: 164: 153: 142: 136: 133: 90: 88: 82: 78:primary sources 66: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 831: 821: 820: 815: 810: 794: 793: 775: 755: 737: 723: 705: 685: 671: 660:. May 19, 2023 645: 644: 642: 639: 638: 637: 619: 618:External links 616: 605: 602: 559:Eighth Circuit 534:pleaded guilty 532:Mark Pulsifer 529: 526: 524: 523: 520: 514: 496: 493: 491: 488: 484:First Step Act 459: 458: 446: 445: 441: 440: 437: 433: 432: 429: 425: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 368: 365: 360: 354: 353: 349: 348: 334: 333: 329: 328: 323: 322: 318: 317: 303: 299: 298: 294: 293: 288: 284: 283: 278: 274: 273: 268: 267:Full case name 264: 263: 257: 256: 251: 243: 242: 234: 231: 230: 213: 212: 171: 169: 162: 155: 154: 69: 67: 60: 55: 29: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 830: 819: 816: 814: 811: 809: 806: 805: 803: 790: 785: 779: 772: 767: 766: 759: 752: 747: 741: 733: 727: 720: 715: 709: 702: 697: 696: 689: 681: 675: 656: 650: 646: 633: 626: 622: 621: 615: 613: 612: 604:Supreme Court 601: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 562: 560: 556: 552: 547: 543: 539: 535: 521: 519: 515: 512: 511: 510: 505: 503: 487: 485: 480: 476: 472:interpreting 471: 467: 466: 456: 452: 447: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 423:Case opinions 421: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359:Chief Justice 358: 357: 355: 350: 345: 341: 335: 330: 324: 319: 315: 311: 307: 304: 300: 295: 292: 291:Oral argument 289: 285: 282: 279: 275: 272: 269: 265: 258: 254: 244: 239: 227: 224: 209: 206: 198: 188: 184: 178: 177: 172:This article 170: 161: 160: 151: 148: 140: 129: 126: 122: 119: 115: 112: 108: 105: 101: 98: â€“  97: 93: 92:Find sources: 86: 80: 79: 75: 70:This article 68: 64: 59: 58: 53: 51: 44: 43: 38: 37: 32: 27: 18: 17: 783: 778: 763: 758: 745: 740: 731: 726: 713: 708: 693: 688: 679: 674: 662:. Retrieved 649: 624: 609: 607: 597: 580:(C). In the 577: 563: 554: 550: 531: 517: 507: 498: 464: 463: 462: 444:Laws applied 410: 398: 395:Neil Gorsuch 386: 379:Samuel Alito 374: 363:John Roberts 305: 297:Case history 270: 219: 201: 195:October 2023 192: 173: 143: 137:October 2023 134: 124: 117: 110: 103: 91: 71: 47: 40: 34: 33:Please help 30: 391:Elena Kagan 316: 2022). 802:Categories 664:August 18, 641:References 611:certiorari 490:Background 277:Docket no. 107:newspapers 74:references 36:improve it 475:18 U.S.C. 451:18 U.S.C. 340:18 U.S.C. 42:talk page 623:Text of 574:Eleventh 428:Majority 314:8th Cir. 287:Argument 590:Seventh 536:in the 436:Dissent 332:Holding 181:Please 121:scholar 787:, 769:, 749:, 717:, 699:, 635:  629:  594:Eighth 592:, and 572:, and 566:Fourth 477:  453:  413: 411:· 409:  401: 399:· 397:  389: 387:· 385:  377: 375:· 373:  342:  312: ( 281:22-340 123:  116:  109:  102:  94:  658:(PDF) 600:(C). 586:Sixth 582:Fifth 570:Ninth 302:Prior 128:JSTOR 114:books 666:2023 310:1018 100:news 578:and 551:and 518:and 76:to 804:: 598:or 588:, 584:, 568:, 555:or 486:. 87:. 45:. 668:. 226:) 220:( 208:) 202:( 197:) 193:( 189:. 150:) 144:( 139:) 135:( 125:· 118:· 111:· 104:· 81:. 52:) 48:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages

references
primary sources
secondary or tertiary sources
"Pulsifer v. United States"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
help improve it
encyclopedic style
Learn how and when to remove this message
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
22-340
Oral argument
1018
8th Cir.
18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(f)(1)
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑