Knowledge

Protected concerted activity

Source 📝

527: 38:
employee's protected actions can be seen as concerted when they are acting on behalf of other employees or bringing a group complaint to their employer. If employee actions do not rise to the level of protected, concerted activity it is said to be unprotected. Additionally, employees can lose their Section 7 protections even involved in protected, concerted activity when they engage illegal tactics or behavior.
54:
for employers to take adverse disciplinary action or retaliate against employees participating in protected concerted activity. When determining what activities workers may partake in without fear of employer retaliation, the Labor Board and courts often must balance the purpose of the act against an
82:
Additionally, NLRA grants workers protections when they "engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of...mutual aid or protection." This is where the term "protected concerted activity" is pulled from. The Act does not detail what other actives are covered by "mutual aid or protection."
125:
Protected concerted activity extends to individual employees in some situations. Typically, an individual employee can be acting in concert when that employee is acting on behalf of or as a representative of at least one other co-worker. Their actions must address general workplace conditions or
121:
Protected concerted activity has extended to individual employees in some situations. when an employee speaks individually to his or her employer on behalf of him or herself and one or more co-workers about improving workplace conditions. An individual employee who seeks to enforce a collective
133:
On the other hand, an employee who acts as a "whistleblower" may or may not be engaging in concerted activity; if the complaint is entirely individual and the employee has not discussed it with co-workers, it is unlikely to be protected by the National Labor Relations Act (though it may well be
98:
The test for what actions are mean to be protected asks what employee actions did Congress intend to protect under the NLRA. Employers have argued this should be textually interpreted to mean only activities directly related to unions and unionizing should be covered. However, the courts have
154:
In this case, the employee's refusal to remove the Black Lives Matter pin was related to prior concerns about racial discrimination in their workplace. Wearing the pin was an employee action to bring group concerns to the attention of the employer and so it was protected concerted activity.
37:
Generally speaking, there is protected concerted activity when two or more employees act together to improve the terms and conditions of their employment. Employees actions can be found to be protected and concerted even where there is no unionizing activity or union involved. An individual
146:
pin while on the job. In this case, the Board ruled it was unlawful for the employer to require the employee to remove the pin as a condition of their continued employment and determined that individuals supporting a group protest that is related to working conditions is protected.
117:
An individual employee addressing a personal complaint with their employer is most easily identifiable as non concerted activities. Additionally, an individual who walks off the job in protest of their personal work assignment is not protected.
150:
Employees supporting political or social rights during work hours is not inherently protected concerted activity. Typically the political activity must be a "logical outgrowth" of group concerns related to employment conditions.
106:., 341 N.L.R.B. 642 (2004), the nursing home staff's concerns and complaints to their employer about the living conditions for their patients were not protected because their complaints were not for the mutual aid of employees. 99:
generally used a more broad interpretation when looking at employee actions. Concerted activity to protest poor or unsafe working conditions even when there has been no union or unionizing activity involved are protected.
114:
Employees are typically seen to be working in concert if an employee is acting with, or acting as a representative of other employees and not solely for their own interests.
50:
to employers seeking to unionize their workplace, or take group action to address conditions of their employment. The NLRA ensures workers protections by making it an
34:. These rights are found in "Section 7" (29 U.S.C. §157) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA, or the Act), and are often referred to as Section 7 protections. 197:
The Act does not limit the manner, time, or place in which employees can engage in concerted activity. Consequently, in recent years, the General Counsel of the
58:
To gain the protection of the Act, employees actions must be both protected and concerted. Section 7 of the Act expressly gives employees the right to:
438: 30:
that refers to the actions employees take to improve their working conditions that are protected from employer interference or retaliation under the
462: 46:
The purpose of the NLRA was to address the unequal bargaining power between employers and employees. The Act aims to extend the full right to
509: 489: 201:
has often taken the position that employee conversations about common workplace issues which make use of social media such as
167:
has often taken the position that employee conversations about common workplace issues which make use of social media such as
184: 31: 95:
have further defined what other activity is protected and concerted for the purposes of gaining Section 7 protections.
92: 553: 463:"Board Rules Employee's "Black Lives Matter" Action at Home Depot Was Protected | National Labor Relations Board" 191: 127: 322: 198: 164: 84: 142:
A National Labor Relations Board decision from February, 2024, protected an employee's right to wear a
532: 126:
bring attention to a group complaint. An individual employee who seeks to enforce the terms of a
27: 47: 506: 486: 102:
Concerted activity taken on behalf of non-employees is not protected activity. In the case of
75: 51: 8: 548: 143: 62: 122:
bargaining agreement will generally be deemed to be engaged in concerted activity.
17: 513: 493: 88: 542: 66: 202: 168: 507:
Report of the Acting General Counsel Concerning Social Media Cases
487:
Report of the Acting General Counsel Concerning Social Media Cases
439:"National Labor Relations Board Finds BLM on Uniform is Protected" 206: 172: 526: 72:
join a union; whether recognized by an employer or not, and
130:
is usually found to be engaged in concerted activity.
522: 78:; with the employer through chosen representatives. 55:employer's property rights and economic interests. 345:National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151-169. 323:"Employee Rights | National Labor Relations Board" 225:National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151-169. 540: 426:Home Depot USA, Inc. and Antonio Morales Jr. 134:protected under some other public policy). 541: 409: 407: 394: 392: 390: 377: 375: 137: 109: 65:; by forming or attempting to form a 41: 310:Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market 185:National Labor Relations Act of 1935 404: 387: 360: 339: 209:are protected against retaliation. 175:are protected against retaliation. 13: 372: 348: 14: 565: 249: 237: 219: 525: 499: 479: 455: 431: 419: 367:NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co. 315: 312:, 361 N.L.R.B. 151, 152 (2014). 298:Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB 270:, 245 N.L.R.B. 814, 816 (1979). 244:NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co. 192:NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co. 158: 128:collective bargaining agreement 303: 291: 282: 273: 261: 228: 199:National Labor Relations Board 165:National Labor Relations Board 85:National Labor Relations Board 1: 414:NLRB v. City Disposal Systems 355:NLRB v. City Disposal Systems 212: 382:Orchard Park Health Care Ctr 104:Orchard Park Health Care Ctr 83:Subsequent decisions by the 32:National Labor Relations Act 24:Protected concerted activity 7: 516:, OM 12-31 (Jan. 24, 2012). 496:, OM 12-31 (Jan. 24, 2012). 178: 163:The General Counsel of the 10: 570: 401:, 281 N.L.R.B. 882 (1986). 258:, 281 N.L.R.B. 882 (1986). 15: 384:. 341 N.L.R.B. 642 (2004) 369:, 370 U.S. 9, 14 (1962). 246:, 370 U.S. 9, 14 (1962). 16:Not to be confused with 533:Organized labour portal 399:Meyers Industries, Inc. 256:Meyers Industries, Inc. 28:United States labor law 554:Freedom of association 428:, 18–CA–273796 (2024). 416:, 465 U.S. 822 (1984). 357:, 465 U.S. 822 (1984). 48:freedom of association 52:unfair labor practice 76:bargain collectively 26:is a term of art in 300:324 U.S. 793 (1945) 512:2013-02-24 at the 492:2013-02-24 at the 144:Black Lives Matter 138:Political activity 110:Concerted activity 93:U.S. Supreme Court 42:Protected activity 561: 535: 530: 529: 517: 503: 497: 483: 477: 476: 474: 473: 459: 453: 452: 450: 449: 443:natlawreview.com 435: 429: 423: 417: 411: 402: 396: 385: 379: 370: 364: 358: 352: 346: 343: 337: 336: 334: 333: 319: 313: 307: 301: 295: 289: 286: 280: 277: 271: 265: 259: 253: 247: 241: 235: 232: 226: 223: 89:Appellate courts 69:in the workplace 18:concerted action 569: 568: 564: 563: 562: 560: 559: 558: 539: 538: 531: 524: 521: 520: 514:Wayback Machine 504: 500: 494:Wayback Machine 484: 480: 471: 469: 461: 460: 456: 447: 445: 437: 436: 432: 424: 420: 412: 405: 397: 388: 380: 373: 365: 361: 353: 349: 344: 340: 331: 329: 321: 320: 316: 308: 304: 296: 292: 287: 283: 278: 274: 266: 262: 254: 250: 242: 238: 234:29 U.S.C. § 157 233: 229: 224: 220: 215: 181: 161: 140: 112: 44: 21: 12: 11: 5: 567: 557: 556: 551: 537: 536: 519: 518: 498: 478: 454: 430: 418: 403: 386: 371: 359: 347: 338: 314: 302: 290: 288:29 U.S.C. §158 281: 279:29 U.S.C. §151 272: 268:Atlantic Steel 260: 248: 236: 227: 217: 216: 214: 211: 195: 194: 188: 187: 180: 177: 160: 157: 139: 136: 111: 108: 80: 79: 73: 70: 43: 40: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 566: 555: 552: 550: 547: 546: 544: 534: 528: 523: 515: 511: 508: 502: 495: 491: 488: 482: 468: 464: 458: 444: 440: 434: 427: 422: 415: 410: 408: 400: 395: 393: 391: 383: 378: 376: 368: 363: 356: 351: 342: 328: 324: 318: 311: 306: 299: 294: 285: 276: 269: 264: 257: 252: 245: 240: 231: 222: 218: 210: 208: 204: 200: 193: 190: 189: 186: 183: 182: 176: 174: 170: 166: 156: 152: 148: 145: 135: 131: 129: 123: 119: 115: 107: 105: 100: 96: 94: 90: 86: 77: 74: 71: 68: 64: 63:Self-organize 61: 60: 59: 56: 53: 49: 39: 35: 33: 29: 25: 19: 501: 481: 470:. Retrieved 467:www.nlrb.gov 466: 457: 446:. Retrieved 442: 433: 425: 421: 413: 398: 381: 366: 362: 354: 350: 341: 330:. Retrieved 327:www.nlrb.gov 326: 317: 309: 305: 297: 293: 284: 275: 267: 263: 255: 251: 243: 239: 230: 221: 196: 162: 159:Social media 153: 149: 141: 132: 124: 120: 116: 113: 103: 101: 97: 81: 57: 45: 36: 23: 22: 549:Labour law 543:Categories 472:2024-04-27 448:2024-04-27 332:2024-04-27 213:References 91:, and the 510:Archived 490:Archived 203:Facebook 179:See also 169:Facebook 207:Twitter 173:Twitter 67:union 505:See 485:See 205:and 171:and 545:: 465:. 441:. 406:^ 389:^ 374:^ 325:. 87:, 475:. 451:. 335:. 20:.

Index

concerted action
United States labor law
National Labor Relations Act
freedom of association
unfair labor practice
Self-organize
union
bargain collectively
National Labor Relations Board
Appellate courts
U.S. Supreme Court
collective bargaining agreement
Black Lives Matter
National Labor Relations Board
Facebook
Twitter
National Labor Relations Act of 1935
NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co.
National Labor Relations Board
Facebook
Twitter
"Employee Rights | National Labor Relations Board"







"National Labor Relations Board Finds BLM on Uniform is Protected"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.