Knowledge

Patent war

Source 📝

451: 383:, as the rapid pace of innovation makes much of the patent system obsolete. In the 1980s, technology corporations in the United States and Japan engaged in a patent war, creating a scenario where companies were forced to "fight patent with patent." This bilateral patent war, partly exaggerated by the media, subsided by the mid 1990s. 398:. According to Detkin, Intel was "sued for libel for the use of the term 'patent extortionists' so I came up with 'patent trolls...a patent troll is somebody who tries to make a lot of money off a patent that they are not practicing and have no intention of practicing and in most cases never practiced." 473:
and encourage innovation, granting innovative companies a temporary competitive advantage over their rivals; however, patents have been used offensively through threats of litigation. This forces companies to allocate time and money that could have been better spent on research and development.
446:
operating system for mobile devices. This triggered a "war" between major technology companies in the mobile market. Apple has been accused of having links to the company Digitude Innovations, which has been labeled as a patent troll. Following this warfare, Apple itself has also been called a
343:
for litigation, whether offensively or defensively. There are ongoing patent wars between the world's largest technology and software corporations. Contemporary patent wars are a global phenomenon, fought by multinational corporations based in the United States, China, Europe, Japan, Korea and
487:
announced in 2012 an "Innovator's Patent Agreement" promising not to use its patents opportunistically and without the consent of the company's employees. There have been commentators favoring abolishing patents entirely, outside of the industries that require them.
368:, credited with inventing the telephone, was dragged into a patent war against his rivals, which involved, in just 11 years, 600 lawsuits. One notable case was Bell's lawsuit against 505: 652: 401:
During the 1990s, federal courts began reversing earlier decisions made by the patent office that restricted the patenting of software. In 1997, software companies
364:, sought to prevent competitors from manufacturing airplanes through litigation, stifling the development of the American airline industry. 513: 536: 141: 593: 933: 857: 823: 693: 625: 660: 322: 136: 442:, Apple brought the patent wars to the smartphone market by its desire to "go thermonuclear war" on Google's competing 126: 981: 787: 1007: 219: 906: 734: 429:. In 2004, Sony and Kodak engaged in a patent war over digital cameras, a dispute which lasted until 2007. 296: 344:
Taiwan. Patent wars have occurred in a wide range of technologies, both in the past and in the present.
443: 353: 464: 183: 162: 111: 80: 315: 224: 131: 1037: 245: 959: 847: 761: 683: 615: 813: 470: 365: 189: 49: 44: 54: 8: 1042: 308: 291: 214: 204: 199: 194: 95: 567: 454:
Alexander Graham Bell was involved in a patent war over the invention of the telephone.
418: 167: 90: 75: 70: 685:
The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism
853: 819: 689: 621: 426: 240: 209: 116: 421:. In 1999, a patent for "one-click ordering technology" led to a patent war between 255: 121: 85: 880: 433: 380: 357: 281: 260: 250: 716:
Sandburg, Brenda (30 July 2001). "Inventor's lawyer makes a pile from patents".
414: 1031: 369: 476: 395: 387: 286: 39: 438: 402: 373: 483:
There are numerous proposals aimed at reducing the risk of patent wars.
450: 907:"Kodak and Sony end patent dispute over digital photography inventions" 422: 406: 265: 390:. The term "patent troll" was coined in the 1990s by the employees of 146: 361: 484: 410: 340: 34: 934:"Apple Made A Deal With The Devil (No, Worse: A Patent Troll)" 391: 386:
Exacerbating the frequency of patent wars was the advent of
339:
is a "battle" between corporations or individuals to secure
852:. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. pp. 170–173. 379:
The occurrence of patent wars has been shaped by the
480:
has written that "only lawyers win in patent wars."
594:"Apple-Samsung Trial Highlights Tricky Patent Wars" 613: 1029: 982:"Is Twitter trying to end the tech patent wars?" 845: 609: 607: 568:"Infographic: Smartphone Patent Wars Explained" 537:"Can You Get A Patent On Being A Patent Troll?" 104:Patentability requirements and related concepts 681: 376:, also credited with inventing the telephone. 688:. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 140–141. 675: 352:Patent wars are not a new phenomenon. In the 316: 839: 604: 849:Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace 620:. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 176–177. 617:The Worldwide History of Telecommunications 811: 506:"Patent Wars Turn Tech into a Battlefield" 323: 309: 1008:"Why We Need To Abolish Software Patents" 805: 715: 503: 449: 436:started in the late 2000s. According to 931: 785: 759: 650: 534: 458: 360:, attributed with the invention of the 16:Battle to secure patents for litigation 1030: 1005: 565: 979: 729: 727: 561: 559: 557: 788:"Symantec retreats in antivirus war" 646: 644: 591: 881:"Digital camera patent war hots up" 786:Galante, Suzanne (29 August 1997). 614:Anton A. Huurdeman (31 July 2003). 585: 13: 957: 932:Kincaid, Jason (9 December 2011). 724: 554: 497: 127:Inventive step and non-obviousness 14: 1054: 682:Ove Granstrand (1 October 2000). 653:"Only Lawyers Win in Patent Wars" 641: 566:Sascha, Segan (19 January 2012). 846:Richard Spinello (6 July 2010). 760:Galante, Suzanne (8 July 1997). 651:Popelka, Larry (24 April 2012). 469:Patents are intended to protect 1006:Wadhwa, Vivek (7 August 2010). 999: 973: 951: 925: 899: 873: 779: 753: 535:Francis, Theo (2 August 2012). 815:The Perfect Store: Inside eBay 762:"Trend Micro wages patent war" 709: 528: 372:. Western Union was backed by 1: 960:"Apple is a patent-troll now" 504:Rowinski, Dan (1 June 2012). 491: 980:Laird, Sam (18 April 2012). 818:. Hachette Inc. p. 90. 592:Lohr, Steve (30 July 2012). 176:By region / country 7: 394:and popularized by Intel's 10: 1059: 812:Adam Cohen (3 June 2003). 462: 354:Wright brothers patent war 347: 233:By specific subject matter 465:Societal views on patents 417:fought a patent war over 184:Patent Cooperation Treaty 163:Sufficiency of disclosure 142:Person skilled in the art 112:Patentable subject matter 155:Other legal requirements 132:Industrial applicability 455: 735:"When Patents Attack" 471:intellectual property 453: 366:Alexander Graham Bell 459:Effects and response 63:Procedural concepts 598:The New York Times 456: 427:Barnes & Noble 419:antivirus software 168:Unity of invention 859:978-1-4496-5402-3 825:978-0-316-16493-1 695:978-1-84064-463-0 663:on April 26, 2012 627:978-0-471-20505-0 333: 332: 1050: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1018: 1003: 997: 996: 994: 992: 977: 971: 970: 968: 966: 955: 949: 948: 946: 944: 929: 923: 922: 920: 918: 913:. 3 January 2007 903: 897: 896: 894: 892: 877: 871: 870: 868: 866: 843: 837: 836: 834: 832: 809: 803: 802: 800: 798: 783: 777: 776: 774: 772: 757: 751: 750: 748: 746: 731: 722: 721: 713: 707: 706: 704: 702: 679: 673: 672: 670: 668: 659:. Archived from 648: 639: 638: 636: 634: 611: 602: 601: 589: 583: 582: 580: 578: 563: 552: 551: 549: 547: 532: 526: 525: 523: 521: 516:on 6 August 2012 512:. Archived from 501: 325: 318: 311: 19: 18: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1016: 1014: 1004: 1000: 990: 988: 978: 974: 964: 962: 956: 952: 942: 940: 930: 926: 916: 914: 905: 904: 900: 890: 888: 879: 878: 874: 864: 862: 860: 844: 840: 830: 828: 826: 810: 806: 796: 794: 784: 780: 770: 768: 758: 754: 744: 742: 733: 732: 725: 714: 710: 700: 698: 696: 680: 676: 666: 664: 649: 642: 632: 630: 628: 612: 605: 590: 586: 576: 574: 564: 555: 545: 543: 533: 529: 519: 517: 502: 498: 494: 467: 461: 434:smartphone wars 388:patent trolling 358:Wright brothers 350: 329: 282:Patent analysis 246:Business method 17: 12: 11: 5: 1056: 1046: 1045: 1040: 1038:Legal disputes 1025: 1024: 998: 972: 950: 924: 911:New York Times 898: 887:. 1 April 2004 872: 858: 838: 824: 804: 778: 752: 741:. 22 July 2011 723: 708: 694: 674: 640: 626: 603: 584: 553: 527: 495: 493: 490: 463:Main article: 460: 457: 447:patent-troll. 349: 346: 331: 330: 328: 327: 320: 313: 305: 302: 301: 300: 299: 294: 289: 284: 276: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 263: 258: 253: 248: 243: 235: 234: 230: 229: 228: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 178: 177: 173: 172: 171: 170: 165: 157: 156: 152: 151: 150: 149: 144: 139: 134: 129: 124: 119: 114: 106: 105: 101: 100: 99: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 65: 64: 60: 59: 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 29: 28: 24: 23: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1055: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1013: 1009: 1002: 987: 983: 976: 961: 958:Wilcox, Joe. 954: 939: 935: 928: 912: 908: 902: 886: 882: 876: 861: 855: 851: 850: 842: 827: 821: 817: 816: 808: 793: 789: 782: 767: 763: 756: 740: 736: 730: 728: 719: 712: 697: 691: 687: 686: 678: 662: 658: 654: 647: 645: 629: 623: 619: 618: 610: 608: 599: 595: 588: 573: 569: 562: 560: 558: 542: 538: 531: 515: 511: 507: 500: 496: 489: 486: 481: 479: 478: 472: 466: 452: 448: 445: 441: 440: 435: 430: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 399: 397: 393: 389: 384: 382: 377: 375: 371: 370:Western Union 367: 363: 359: 355: 345: 342: 338: 326: 321: 319: 314: 312: 307: 306: 304: 303: 298: 295: 293: 290: 288: 285: 283: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 272: 267: 264: 262: 259: 257: 254: 252: 249: 247: 244: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 231: 226: 225:United States 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 188: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 175: 174: 169: 166: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158: 154: 153: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 109: 108: 107: 103: 102: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 67: 66: 62: 61: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 32: 31: 30: 26: 25: 21: 20: 1015:. Retrieved 1011: 1001: 989:. Retrieved 985: 975: 963:. Retrieved 953: 941:. Retrieved 937: 927: 915:. Retrieved 910: 901: 889:. Retrieved 884: 875: 863:. Retrieved 848: 841: 829:. Retrieved 814: 807: 795:. Retrieved 791: 781: 769:. Retrieved 765: 755: 743:. Retrieved 738: 718:The Recorder 717: 711: 699:. Retrieved 684: 677: 665:. Retrieved 661:the original 657:Businessweek 656: 631:. Retrieved 616: 597: 587: 575:. Retrieved 571: 544:. Retrieved 540: 530: 518:. Retrieved 514:the original 510:ReadWriteWeb 509: 499: 482: 477:Businessweek 475: 468: 437: 432:The current 431: 400: 396:Peter Detkin 385: 378: 351: 336: 334: 287:Pirate Party 117:Inventorship 96:Infringement 40:Patent claim 965:20 December 572:PC Magazine 439:PC Magazine 403:Trend Micro 381:digital age 374:Elisha Gray 220:Netherlands 76:Prosecution 71:Application 1043:Patent law 1032:Categories 1012:Techcrunch 938:Techcrunch 492:References 423:Amazon.com 407:Integralis 337:patent war 241:Biological 81:Opposition 22:Patent law 256:Insurance 190:Australia 147:Prior art 91:Licensing 86:Valuation 55:Criticism 50:Economics 27:Overviews 1017:8 August 991:6 August 943:6 August 917:6 August 891:6 August 865:7 August 831:7 August 797:6 August 771:6 August 745:8 August 701:6 August 667:6 August 633:7 August 577:6 August 546:6 August 520:6 August 415:Symantec 362:airplane 297:Glossary 292:Category 274:See also 261:Software 251:Chemical 485:Twitter 444:Android 411:McAffee 348:History 341:patents 210:Germany 137:Utility 122:Novelty 45:History 856:  822:  692:  624:  356:, the 205:Europe 195:Canada 35:Patent 392:Intel 215:Japan 200:China 186:(PCT) 1019:2012 993:2012 967:2012 945:2012 919:2012 893:2012 867:2012 854:ISBN 833:2012 820:ISBN 799:2012 792:CNET 773:2012 766:CNET 747:2012 703:2012 690:ISBN 669:2012 635:2012 622:ISBN 579:2012 548:2012 522:2012 425:and 413:and 986:CNN 885:BBC 739:NPR 541:NPR 266:Tax 1034:: 1010:. 984:. 936:. 909:. 883:. 790:. 764:. 737:. 726:^ 655:. 643:^ 606:^ 596:. 570:. 556:^ 539:. 508:. 409:, 405:, 335:A 1021:. 995:. 969:. 947:. 921:. 895:. 869:. 835:. 801:. 775:. 749:. 720:. 705:. 671:. 637:. 600:. 581:. 550:. 524:. 324:e 317:t 310:v

Index

Patent
Patent claim
History
Economics
Criticism
Application
Prosecution
Opposition
Valuation
Licensing
Infringement
Patentable subject matter
Inventorship
Novelty
Inventive step and non-obviousness
Industrial applicability
Utility
Person skilled in the art
Prior art
Sufficiency of disclosure
Unity of invention
Patent Cooperation Treaty
Australia
Canada
China
Europe
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
United States

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.