223:(2012).) If a river was considered navigable at the time of statehood, the land below the navigable water was conveyed to the state as part of the transportation network in order to facilitate commerce. Most states retained title to these navigable rivers in trust for the public. Some states divested themselves of title to the land below navigable rivers, but a federal navigable servitude remains if the river is a navigable waterway. Title to the lands submerged by smaller streams are considered part of the property through which the water flows and there is no 'public right' to enter upon private property based on the mere presence of water.
237:"a significant nexus to navigable waters"; both are covered under the Clean Water Act. Therefore, the Clean Water Act establishes Federal jurisdiction beyond "navigable waters" extending a more limited federal jurisdiction under the Act over private property which may at times be submerged by waters. Because jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act extends beyond public property, the broader definitions of "traditional navigable" and "significant nexus" used to establish the scope of authority under the Act are still ambiguously defined and therefore open to judicial interpretation as indicated in two U.S. Supreme Court decisions:
20:
182:
409:
420:
174:
442:– Nature has already done the initial engineering work for the transportation infrastructure, the cost of developing an inland waterway is 5–10% of the cost developing an equivalent railway or a four-lane expressway. This varies a lot, depending on whether the waterway is naturally navigable, whether only ports are needed, or whether a
192:
What constitutes "navigable" waters can not be separated from the context in which the question is asked. Numerous federal agencies define jurisdiction based on navigable waters, including admiralty jurisdiction, pollution control, to the licensing of dams, and even property boundaries. The numerous
319:
The decision by New York's highest court established that recreational 'navigability' alone is not sufficient to prove that a waterway is a public highway in New York State. The US Supreme Court had also found that use of modern water craft insufficient evidence to support a finding of navigability
236:
has introduced the terms "traditional navigable waters," and "waters of the United States" to define the scope of
Federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. Here, "Waters of the United States" include not only navigable waters, but also tributaries of navigable waters and nearby wetlands with
218:
For the purposes of transferring property title into public property, the definition of a
Navigable waterways closely follows 33 CFR 329. For the purpose of establishing which river is public and therefore state-owned, what is navigable is a constitutional question defined by Federal case law. (See
214:
for any construction in or over any navigable water, or the excavation or discharge of material into such water, or the accomplishment of any other work affecting the course, location, condition, or capacity of such waters. However, the ACOE recognizes that only the judiciary can make a definitive
252:
Finally, a water-body is presumed non-navigable with the burden of proof on the party claiming it is navigable. The U.S. Forest
Service considers a waterbody not navigable until is adjudicated otherwise. see Whitewater v. Tidwell 770 F. 3d 1108 (2014). Therefore, and public rights associated with
497:
Safety risks – Risks to human life and health most prominently involve drowning or, in cold waters, hypothermia, if a passenger or crew member falls overboard. Seasickness is a comparatively minor issue in turbulent waters. Risks to property include water damage and the much greater difficulty in
464:
Easy integration with sea transport – Inland water transport can easily integrated with Sea transport and hence it reduces the extra cost required for land-sea or air-sea transport interface infrastructure development. It also reduces the time taken to transfer the goods to and from sea transport
226:
The scope of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) authority was granted under the Federal Power Act, 1941 (16 U.S.C 791). Such authority is based on congressional authority to regulate commerce; it is not based exclusively on title to the riverbed or even navigability. Therefore,
317:"the Waterway's historical and prospective commercial utility, the Waterway's historical accessibility to the public, the relative ease of passage by canoe, the volume of historical travel, and the volume of prospective commercial and recreational use."
461:(low cost of transportation) for large freight – It is estimated that 1 liter of fuel can move 105 ton-km by inland water transport. Whereas the same amount of fuel can move only 85 ton-km by rail and 24 ton-km by road. By air, it is even less.
249:. However, because authority under the Act is limited to protecting only navigable waters, jurisdiction over these smaller creeks is not absolute and may require just compensation to property owners when invoked to protect downstream waters.
200:, are those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, and those inland waters that are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce while the
481:
Low availability of inland waterways – As mentioned above, there are numerous criteria for a water body to be navigable. Out of the total inland water body available in the world, only a very low percentage of it is potentially
449:
Cheaper maintenance cost – The maintenance cost of an inland waterway is only 20% of the maintenance cost of an equivalent roadway. The main expenses associated with waterway maintenance include dredging and
155:) Systems have been used for centuries in countries including India, China, Egypt, the Netherlands, the United States, Germany, and Bangladesh. In the Netherlands, IWT handles 46% of the nation's inland
193:
definitions and jurisdictional statutes have created an array of case law specific to which context the question of navigability arises. Some of the most commonly discussed definitions are listed here.
491:
Flexibility – Inland waterways are less flexible like roads. Transportation can be carried out only with some fixed points, individualization or molding for public benefit is not possible.
488:
Seasonal character of rivers – In extreme weather condition waterways may freeze or dry. Therefore, It would not be possible to carry out the transportation throughout the year.
311:
on plaintiff's land where absolutely necessary for the limited purpose of avoiding obstacles to navigation such as the Mud Pond rapids." However, New York's highest court, the
239:
400:
It is estimated that the total navigable length of inland waterways is 14500 km. A total of 16 million tonnes of freight is moved by this mode of transport.
210:(33 U.S.C. 403), approved 3 March 1899, prohibits the unauthorized obstruction of a navigable water of the U.S. This statute also requires a permit from the
267:
471:
Safety – Undoubtedly, inland water transport is less risky as compared to other means of transport, mainly due to far less traffic and slower speeds.
636:
304:
396:) stretch of West Coast Canal (410 km) along with Champakara canal and Udyogmandal canal in February, 1993 as National Waterway 3
593:
USACE, Civil Works
Regulatory Program – CWA Guidance to Implement the U.S. Supreme Court Decision for the Rapanos and Carabell Cases
494:
Navigability – Diversion of water for irrigation reduces river flow and further siltation breaks down the navigability very easily.
291:, meaning that they are subject to an easement for public travel, even if they are on private land. Brown argued that because he
577:
168:
227:
FERC's permitting authority extends to the flow from non-navigable tributaries in order to protect commerce downstream, , .
276:
58:(e.g. boats) to pass safely. Navigability is also referred to in the broader context of a body of water having sufficient
346:
468:
Tourism – Inland water transport has the potential to play a role in the development of tourism, especially Eco-tourism.
206:
28:
434:
Waterways provide enormous advantages as a mode of transport compared to land and air modes of transports.
211:
24:
295:'navigated' the waterway through private property, it was therefore a public highway. He prevailed in the
111:
regions. Navigability also depends on context: a small river may be navigable by smaller craft such as a
197:
307:, Third Department. The land was found "subject to a public right of navigation, including the right to
513:
329:
569:
351:
In India there are currently three
National Waterways totaling a distance of 2921 km. They are:
315:
overturned the lower court decisions, and sent the case back to the trial court for consideration of
312:
654:
618:
604:
700:
245:
592:
485:
Low speed – Water transport as a whole is much slower than its road, rail, or air competitors.
71:, and is preferably with few obstructions against direct traverse that need avoiding, such as
389:
334:
186:
92:
624:. State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department. 2015-01-15.
523:
59:
8:
372:
96:
412:
695:
573:
379:
196:
Navigable waters, as defined by the US Army Corps of
Engineers as codified under 33
451:
272:
533:
458:
284:
232:
655:"Friends of Thayer Lake LLC v. Brown, 27 NY 3d 1039 – NY: Court of Appeals 2016"
538:
528:
427:
423:
100:
72:
19:
680:
265:, which can lead to considerable confusion. In 2009, journalist Phil Brown of
689:
518:
439:
367:
35:
253:
navigability cannot be presumed to exist without a finding of navigability.
287:. In New York State, waterways that are 'navigable-in-fact' are considered
55:
16:
Capacity of a body of water to allow the passage of vessels at a given time
283:, within a tract of private property surrounded by public land within the
204:
is in its ordinary condition at the time of statehood. Section 10 of the
181:
296:
262:
132:
128:
124:
605:"Adirondack Club v. Sierra, 706 NE 2d 1192 – NY: Court of Appeals 1998"
543:
408:
292:
140:
120:
499:
359:
112:
88:
300:
201:
136:
108:
67:
475:
173:
419:
308:
288:
156:
159:; 32% in Bangladesh, 14% in the United States, and 9% in China.
403:
393:
385:
363:
355:
127:. Shallow rivers may be made navigable by the installation of
84:
382:
system (891 km) in
September, 1988 as National Waterway 2
443:
280:
116:
43:
39:
637:"Ruling Favors Public Use of Adirondacks' Private Waterways"
80:
76:
47:
256:
340:
104:
303:
by the owners of the property, a decision upheld by the
557:
215:ruling as to which are navigable waters.33 CFR 329
146:
687:
634:
619:"Friends of Thayer Lake LLC et al. v Phil Brown"
564:Gilardoni, Eduardo O.; Presedo, Juan P. (2017).
563:
476:Disadvantages of inland water transport systems
370:river system (1620 km) in October 1986 as
404:Advantages of inland water transport systems
305:New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
87:built over waterways must have sufficient
54:if it is deep, wide and calm enough for a
131:that regulate flow and increase upstream
418:
407:
180:
172:
103:. Waters may be unnavigable because of
18:
162:
688:
667:Montana PPL v Montana US Supra (2013)
341:Inland water transport system in India
275:postings to make a direct transit of
169:Inland waterways of the United States
347:Inland Waterways Authority of India
65:Such a navigable water is called a
13:
14:
712:
674:
107:, particularly in winter or high-
23:Navigation markers, entrance of
635:Lisa W. Foderaro (2015-01-19).
661:
647:
628:
611:
597:
586:
378:Saidiya-Dhubri stretch of the
207:Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
147:Inland water transport systems
119:, but unnavigable by a larger
1:
681:International Transport Forum
550:
257:Confusion over "navigability"
29:Swan River, Western Australia
566:Navigation in Shallow Waters
212:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
7:
506:
323:
99:unnavigable due to risk of
10:
717:
514:Glossary of nautical terms
344:
330:Inland Waterway (Michigan)
261:'Navigability' is a legal
177:Inland Waterway Connection
166:
139:that deepens parts of the
570:Witherby Publishing Group
313:New York Court of Appeals
240:Carabell v. United States
568:. Livingston, Scotland:
246:Rapanos v. United States
151:Inland Water Transport (
498:recovering goods if a
431:
416:
189:
178:
31:
446:and locks are needed.
422:
411:
335:Intracoastal Waterway
221:PPL Montana v Montana
187:Intracoastal Waterway
184:
176:
22:
524:Inland sea (geology)
163:In the United States
60:under keel clearance
415:(Slovakia) at night
373:National Waterway 1
268:Adirondack Explorer
641:The New York Times
432:
417:
413:Port of Bratislava
368:Bhagirathi-Hooghly
190:
179:
32:
579:978-1-85609-667-6
380:Brahmaputra River
25:Fremantle harbour
708:
668:
665:
659:
658:
651:
645:
644:
632:
626:
625:
623:
615:
609:
608:
601:
595:
590:
584:
583:
561:
452:invasive species
426:on the shore of
273:private property
716:
715:
711:
710:
709:
707:
706:
705:
701:Water transport
686:
685:
677:
672:
671:
666:
662:
653:
652:
648:
633:
629:
621:
617:
616:
612:
603:
602:
598:
591:
587:
580:
562:
558:
553:
548:
534:Merchant vessel
509:
478:
459:fuel efficiency
406:
362:stretch of the
349:
343:
326:
289:public highways
285:Adirondack Park
259:
233:Clean Water Act
171:
165:
149:
101:ship collisions
17:
12:
11:
5:
714:
704:
703:
698:
684:
683:
676:
675:External links
673:
670:
669:
660:
646:
627:
610:
596:
585:
578:
555:
554:
552:
549:
547:
546:
541:
539:Ship transport
536:
531:
529:Lake freighter
526:
521:
516:
510:
508:
505:
504:
503:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
477:
474:
473:
472:
469:
466:
462:
455:
447:
428:Lake Kallavesi
424:Port of Kuopio
405:
402:
398:
397:
383:
376:
345:Main article:
342:
339:
338:
337:
332:
325:
322:
299:when sued for
293:recreationally
258:
255:
185:Sunset on the
167:Main article:
164:
161:
148:
145:
62:for a vessel.
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
713:
702:
699:
697:
694:
693:
691:
682:
679:
678:
664:
656:
650:
642:
638:
631:
620:
614:
606:
600:
594:
589:
581:
575:
571:
567:
560:
556:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
519:Inland harbor
517:
515:
512:
511:
501:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
480:
479:
470:
467:
463:
460:
456:
453:
448:
445:
441:
437:
436:
435:
429:
425:
421:
414:
410:
401:
395:
391:
387:
384:
381:
377:
375:
374:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
352:
348:
336:
333:
331:
328:
327:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
264:
254:
250:
248:
247:
242:
241:
235:
234:
228:
224:
222:
216:
213:
209:
208:
203:
199:
194:
188:
183:
175:
170:
160:
158:
154:
144:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
63:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
36:body of water
30:
26:
21:
663:
649:
640:
630:
613:
599:
588:
565:
559:
500:vessel sinks
440:capital cost
433:
399:
371:
350:
316:
266:
260:
251:
244:
238:
231:
229:
225:
220:
217:
205:
195:
191:
152:
150:
66:
64:
56:water vessel
51:
38:, such as a
33:
390:Kottappuram
301:trespassing
297:trial court
263:term of art
133:water level
125:cruise ship
95:may make a
690:Categories
551:References
544:Watercraft
482:navigable.
230:Also, the
141:stream bed
93:flow speed
360:Allahabad
121:freighter
113:motorboat
89:clearance
52:navigable
696:Shipping
507:See also
465:vessels.
457:Greater
454:control.
438:Cheaper
324:Examples
277:Mud Pond
202:waterway
137:dredging
135:, or by
109:latitude
68:waterway
27:and the
430:in 2005
309:portage
271:defied
198:CFR 329
157:freight
97:channel
91:. High
85:Bridges
576:
394:Kerala
386:Kollam
364:Ganges
356:Haldia
622:(PDF)
444:canal
281:canoe
129:locks
117:kayak
115:or a
81:trees
77:reefs
73:rocks
50:, is
44:canal
40:river
574:ISBN
392:(in
243:and
48:lake
279:by
153:IWT
123:or
105:ice
79:or
46:or
692::
639:.
572:.
143:.
83:.
75:,
42:,
34:A
657:.
643:.
607:.
582:.
502:.
388:-
366:-
358:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
