Knowledge

Modal scope fallacy

Source đź“ť

25: 1463: 87: 167:
Because c) presumes b) will always be the case, it is a fallacy of necessity. John, of course, is always free to stop being a bachelor, simply by getting married; if he does so, b) is no longer true and thus not subject to the
164:
and therefore true. The condition b) is a statement of fact about John which makes him subject to a); that is, b) declares John a bachelor, and a) states that all bachelors are unmarried.
246: 288: 172:
a). In this case, c) has unwarranted necessity by assuming, incorrectly, that John cannot stop being a bachelor. Formally speaking, this type of argument equivocates between the
580: 585: 387: 420: 963: 620: 462: 774: 68: 46: 39: 207: 255: 1487: 376:(1979), "Problems with the use of "it is necessary that"; the modal fallacy; absolute and relative necessity", 1382: 590: 1418: 1394: 983: 299: 180: 174: 995: 739: 1005: 105: 1413: 970: 866: 1408: 1248: 716: 552: 508: 332: 33: 1428: 1243: 759: 455: 1350: 1340: 1290: 1264: 1040: 914: 881: 782: 764: 664: 513: 495: 50: 1388: 1376: 1356: 1345: 1260: 1073: 1049: 871: 827: 679: 605: 518: 1497: 1403: 1307: 1271: 1186: 1142: 978: 909: 699: 528: 503: 161: 8: 1281: 1180: 1127: 1103: 1026: 929: 861: 787: 595: 572: 547: 1492: 1466: 1399: 1213: 1098: 1083: 1030: 990: 939: 876: 835: 812: 792: 695: 539: 523: 448: 1285: 1122: 1112: 1088: 1065: 1021: 947: 899: 857: 817: 659: 654: 476: 383: 169: 95: 416: 1435: 1276: 1175: 1117: 1055: 850: 729: 724: 709: 674: 634: 562: 557: 125: 1192: 1156: 1132: 952: 924: 904: 752: 720: 704: 669: 426: 1093: 1078: 1000: 919: 845: 485: 400: 1481: 1218: 1108: 840: 803: 747: 615: 610: 396: 373: 100: 184:
necessity of c). The argument is only valid if both a) and c) are construed
1230: 649: 440: 1423: 1200: 1137: 311: 197: 188:. This, however, would undermine the argument, as a) is only a tautology 356: 1333: 1327: 1254: 1166: 132:
whereby a degree of unwarranted necessity is placed in the conclusion.
1440: 1224: 1208: 891: 339:(Summer 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 129: 1370: 1318: 472: 377: 379:
Possible Worlds: An Introduction to Logic and Its Philosophy
258: 210: 422:
Eternal Questions: Free Will and Divine Omniscience
282: 240: 1479: 382:, Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 330–332, 581:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise 586:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises 456: 371: 196:, it is false. Using the formal symbolism in 241:{\displaystyle \Box (Bx\rightarrow \neg Mx)} 470: 94:It has been suggested that this article be 463: 449: 283:{\displaystyle Bx\rightarrow \Box \neg Mx} 1164: 69:Learn how and when to remove this message 1317: 355:Curtis, Gary N., "Modal Scope Fallacy", 32:This article includes a list of general 337:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1480: 330: 444: 143:Bachelors are necessarily unmarried. 80: 18: 415: 13: 395: 354: 271: 226: 38:it lacks sufficient corresponding 14: 1509: 160:The condition a) appears to be a 1462: 1461: 85: 23: 959:Correlation implies causation 324: 265: 235: 223: 214: 111:Proposed since September 2024. 1: 335:, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), 317: 7: 402:More on "The" Modal Fallacy 293: 10: 1514: 1383:I'm entitled to my opinion 248:is a tautology, while the 135: 1457: 1366: 1305: 1239: 1155: 1064: 1039: 1014: 938: 890: 826: 801: 773: 738: 688: 642: 633: 571: 537: 493: 484: 178:necessity of a) and the 1409:Motte-and-bailey fallacy 509:Affirming the consequent 1429:Two wrongs make a right 760:Denying the correlative 53:more precise citations. 1414:Psychologist's fallacy 1351:Argument to moderation 1341:Argument from anecdote 1291:Chronological snobbery 915:Quoting out of context 882:Overwhelming exception 765:Suppressed correlative 665:Quoting out of context 540:quantificational logic 514:Denying the antecedent 331:Garson, James (2021), 284: 242: 192:– indeed, interpreted 1488:Syllogistic fallacies 1377:The Four Great Errors 1357:Argumentum ad populum 1346:Argument from silence 1050:Argumentum ad baculum 828:Faulty generalization 519:Argument from fallacy 307:: Context of modality 285: 243: 1395:Invincible ignorance 1201:Reductio ad Stalinum 1187:Reductio ad Hitlerum 1143:Wisdom of repugnance 910:Moving the goalposts 775:Illicit transference 700:Begging the question 621:Undistributed middle 529:Mathematical fallacy 504:Affirming a disjunct 256: 208: 122:fallacy of necessity 1128:Parade of horribles 1104:In-group favoritism 930:Syntactic ambiguity 573:Syllogistic fallacy 496:propositional logic 149:John is a bachelor. 1214:Poisoning the well 1031:Proof by assertion 1006:Texas sharpshooter 940:Questionable cause 877:Slothful induction 836:Anecdotal evidence 696:Circular reasoning 591:Exclusive premises 553:Illicit conversion 372:Bradley, Raymond; 280: 238: 155:John cannot marry. 128:in the logic of a 1475: 1474: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1389:Ignoratio elenchi 1301: 1300: 1151: 1150: 1113:Not invented here 818:Converse accident 740:Correlative-based 717:Compound question 660:False attribution 655:False equivalence 629: 628: 389:978-0-915144-60-0 358:The Fallacy Files 118: 117: 113: 79: 78: 71: 1505: 1465: 1464: 1436:Special pleading 1315: 1314: 1176:Appeal to motive 1162: 1161: 1138:Stirring symbols 1118:Island mentality 1056:Wishful thinking 1037: 1036: 753:Perfect solution 730:No true Scotsman 725:Complex question 710:Leading question 689:Question-begging 675:No true Scotsman 640: 639: 563:Quantifier shift 558:Proof by example 491: 490: 465: 458: 451: 442: 441: 437: 436: 434: 425:, archived from 412: 411: 409: 392: 368: 367: 365: 347: 346: 345: 344: 328: 289: 287: 286: 281: 247: 245: 244: 239: 109: 89: 88: 81: 74: 67: 63: 60: 54: 49:this article by 40:inline citations 27: 26: 19: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1471: 1445: 1419:Rationalization 1362: 1309: 1297: 1235: 1157:Genetic fallacy 1147: 1060: 1035: 1010: 934: 925:Sorites paradox 905:False precision 886: 867:Double counting 822: 797: 769: 734: 721:Loaded question 705:Loaded language 684: 625: 567: 533: 480: 469: 432: 430: 417:FranzĂ©n, Torkel 407: 405: 390: 363: 361: 351: 350: 342: 340: 329: 325: 320: 296: 257: 254: 253: 209: 206: 205: 138: 114: 90: 86: 75: 64: 58: 55: 45:Please help to 44: 28: 24: 17: 16:Logical fallacy 12: 11: 5: 1511: 1501: 1500: 1495: 1490: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1469: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1397: 1392: 1385: 1380: 1373: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1360: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1323: 1321: 1312: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1258: 1251: 1249:Accomplishment 1240: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1233: 1228: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1178: 1172: 1170: 1159: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1106: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1070: 1068: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1058: 1053: 1045: 1043: 1034: 1033: 1024: 1018: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1008: 1003: 1001:Slippery slope 998: 993: 988: 987: 986: 976: 975: 974: 967: 957: 956: 955: 944: 942: 936: 935: 933: 932: 927: 922: 920:Slippery slope 917: 912: 907: 902: 896: 894: 888: 887: 885: 884: 879: 874: 869: 864: 855: 854: 853: 848: 846:Cherry picking 838: 832: 830: 824: 823: 821: 820: 815: 809: 807: 799: 798: 796: 795: 790: 785: 779: 777: 771: 770: 768: 767: 762: 757: 756: 755: 744: 742: 736: 735: 733: 732: 727: 714: 713: 712: 702: 692: 690: 686: 685: 683: 682: 677: 672: 667: 662: 657: 652: 646: 644: 637: 631: 630: 627: 626: 624: 623: 618: 613: 608: 603: 598: 593: 588: 583: 577: 575: 569: 568: 566: 565: 560: 555: 550: 544: 542: 535: 534: 532: 531: 526: 521: 516: 511: 506: 500: 498: 488: 482: 481: 468: 467: 460: 453: 445: 439: 438: 413: 397:Swartz, Norman 393: 388: 374:Swartz, Norman 369: 349: 348: 322: 321: 319: 316: 315: 314: 309: 295: 292: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 264: 261: 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 158: 157: 153:Therefore, c) 151: 145: 137: 134: 116: 115: 93: 91: 84: 77: 76: 31: 29: 22: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1510: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1483: 1468: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1322: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1304: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1169: 1168: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1154: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1110: 1109:Invented here 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1067: 1063: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1042: 1038: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1013: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 997: 994: 992: 989: 985: 982: 981: 980: 977: 973: 972: 968: 966: 965: 961: 960: 958: 954: 951: 950: 949: 946: 945: 943: 941: 937: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 897: 895: 893: 889: 883: 880: 878: 875: 873: 872:False analogy 870: 868: 865: 863: 859: 856: 852: 849: 847: 844: 843: 842: 841:Sampling bias 839: 837: 834: 833: 831: 829: 825: 819: 816: 814: 811: 810: 808: 806: 805: 804:Secundum quid 800: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 780: 778: 776: 772: 766: 763: 761: 758: 754: 751: 750: 749: 748:False dilemma 746: 745: 743: 741: 737: 731: 728: 726: 722: 718: 715: 711: 708: 707: 706: 703: 701: 697: 694: 693: 691: 687: 681: 678: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 647: 645: 641: 638: 636: 632: 622: 619: 617: 616:Illicit minor 614: 612: 611:Illicit major 609: 607: 604: 602: 599: 597: 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 578: 576: 574: 570: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 549: 546: 545: 543: 541: 536: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 510: 507: 505: 502: 501: 499: 497: 492: 489: 487: 483: 478: 474: 466: 461: 459: 454: 452: 447: 446: 443: 429:on 2007-07-08 428: 424: 423: 418: 414: 404: 403: 398: 394: 391: 385: 381: 380: 375: 370: 360: 359: 353: 352: 338: 334: 333:"Modal Logic" 327: 323: 313: 310: 308: 306: 302: 298: 297: 291: 277: 274: 268: 262: 259: 251: 232: 229: 220: 217: 211: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 177: 176: 171: 165: 163: 156: 152: 150: 146: 144: 140: 139: 133: 131: 127: 123: 112: 107: 103: 102: 101:Modal fallacy 97: 92: 83: 82: 73: 70: 62: 52: 48: 42: 41: 35: 30: 21: 20: 1404:Naturalistic 1387: 1375: 1355: 1326: 1310:of relevance 1253: 1231:Whataboutism 1223: 1199: 1193:Godwin's law 1185: 1165: 1048: 1041:Consequences 1022:Law/Legality 996:Single cause 969: 962: 802: 670:Loki's Wager 650:Equivocation 643:Equivocation 600: 431:, retrieved 427:the original 421: 406:, retrieved 401: 378: 362:, retrieved 357: 341:, retrieved 336: 326: 304: 300: 249: 201: 193: 189: 185: 179: 173: 166: 159: 154: 148: 142: 121: 119: 110: 99: 65: 59:October 2019 56: 37: 1498:Modal logic 1424:Red herring 1181:Association 862:Conjunction 783:Composition 680:Reification 596:Existential 548:Existential 312:Modal logic 252:expression 204:expression 198:modal logic 51:introducing 1482:Categories 1400:Moralistic 1334:Sealioning 1328:Ad nauseam 1255:Ipse dixit 1167:Ad hominem 991:Regression 793:Ecological 606:Four terms 524:Masked man 433:22 October 408:22 October 364:22 October 343:2022-03-02 318:References 290:is false. 34:references 1493:Necessity 1441:Straw man 1319:Arguments 1308:fallacies 1282:Tradition 1272:Etymology 1244:Authority 1225:Tu quoque 1209:Bulverism 979:Gambler's 948:Animistic 892:Ambiguity 858:Base rate 601:Necessity 473:fallacies 272:¬ 269:◻ 266:→ 227:¬ 224:→ 212:◻ 170:tautology 162:tautology 130:syllogism 1467:Category 1099:Ridicule 1084:Flattery 1074:Children 971:Post hoc 851:McNamara 813:Accident 788:Division 635:Informal 301:De dicto 294:See also 202:de dicto 190:de dicto 175:de dicto 1286:Novelty 1261:Poverty 1123:Loyalty 1089:Novelty 1066:Emotion 1015:Appeals 984:Inverse 964:Cum hoc 953:Furtive 471:Common 136:Example 126:fallacy 106:Discuss 47:improve 1371:ClichĂ© 1306:Other 1277:Nature 1265:Wealth 900:Accent 486:Formal 386:  200:, the 96:merged 36:, but 1133:Spite 1027:Stone 305:de re 250:de re 194:de re 186:de re 181:de re 124:is a 98:into 1219:Tone 1094:Pity 1079:Fear 477:list 435:2014 410:2014 384:ISBN 366:2014 303:and 538:In 494:In 147:b) 141:a) 104:. ( 1484:: 1402:/ 1284:/ 1263:/ 1111:/ 1029:/ 860:/ 723:/ 719:/ 698:/ 419:, 399:, 120:A 479:) 475:( 464:e 457:t 450:v 278:x 275:M 263:x 260:B 236:) 233:x 230:M 221:x 218:B 215:( 108:) 72:) 66:( 61:) 57:( 43:.

Index

references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
merged
Modal fallacy
Discuss
fallacy
syllogism
tautology
tautology
de dicto
de re
modal logic
De dicto and de re: Context of modality
Modal logic
"Modal Logic"
The Fallacy Files
Swartz, Norman
Possible Worlds: An Introduction to Logic and Its Philosophy
ISBN
978-0-915144-60-0
Swartz, Norman
More on "The" Modal Fallacy
Franzén, Torkel
Eternal Questions: Free Will and Divine Omniscience
the original
v
t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑