357:. For a publication to be considered obscene, taken as a whole, it must appear to "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", to appeal to the prurient interest, depict sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
487:. Statute prohibiting sale or distribution of contraceptives to a minor under 16; for anyone other than a licensed pharmacist to distribute contraceptives to persons 16 or over; and for anyone, including licensed pharmacists, to advertise or display contraceptives, is unconstitutional.
106:'s prohibition against birth control products or information as obscene/lewd or lascivious was held to not apply to shipments from a physician. The federal government could not interfere with doctors providing contraception to their patients.
510:. A judge who ordered the sterilization of an allegedly retarded young woman was immune from civil suit even though he did not hold a hearing to receive evidence or appoint an attorney to represent the woman's interests.
229:. The law prohibiting an unmarried interracial couple from habitually living in and occupying the same room in the nighttime that does not apply to couples of the same race violates equal protection clause.
409:
160:. Obscenity is defined as material that "to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interest".
814:
303:" unconstitutionally vague in the case of consensual sodomy, thus the crime could now only be charged under a different, lesser statute, reducing the penalty from a felony to a misdemeanor.
448:
712:
853:
732:
538:
554:
744:. A statute prohibiting private consensual oral sodomy between married persons is unconstitutional, because it infringes upon the constitutional right of privacy.
748:
829:(Minn. Dist. Ct 2001) Minnesota sodomy law found to violate state constitutional right to privacy, in cases where it is private, consensual, and non-commercial.
870:
666:
607:
496:
473:
430:
395:
366:
343:
312:
269:
238:
215:
192:
169:
146:
115:
64:
598:. Administrative discharge from U.S. Navy for homosexual conduct is valid because private, consensual, homosexual conduct is not constitutionally protected.
764:
586:
625:
between people of the same sex in the privacy of one's home may be made illegal. (The statute was later struck down on State
Constitutional grounds; see
550:. The term "lewd, wanton and lascivious person" used in a Massachusetts sex crime statute was unconstitutionally vague as it applied to consenting adults.
806:
582:. Federal District Court finds Texas sodomy law unconstitutional; Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturns and holds law to be constitutional.
833:
684:
206:. In the absence of an actual threat of prosecution, plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Connecticut law making use of contraceptives illegal.
90:
821:
884:. A Texas law making sodomy with same sex partner illegal, but not with opposite sex partner, is unconstitutional. This case expressly overturns
908:
as precedent. Kansas law allowing for opposite-sex statutory rape to be punished less severely than same-sex statutory rape is unconstitutional.
728:, Texas state appellate court affirms lower court decision finding prohibition on hiring gays and lesbians as police officers unconstitutional.
425:
826:
987:
917:
817:(Baltimore City Cir. Ct. 1999). State of Maryland agrees to court order declaring its law forbidding consensual sodomy unconstitutional.
811:
468:
444:. U.S. Supreme Court gave summary decision which sustained lower court's finding that Virginia's Sodomy statute is constitutional.
792:. The Georgia State Supreme Court finds the law making consensual sodomy a crime which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in
1043:
42:
The following is a list of noteworthy sex-related court cases in order by date. (Note that in the legal sense, the term "
696:. Texas statute that criminalizes private sexual relations between consenting adults of the same sex is unconstitutional.
1048:
982:
559:
453:
390:
1007:
948:
661:
20:
921:
846:
570:
law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional. (The state would repeal the law 15 years later.)
414:
380:. Theatre manager's conviction of "the crime of distributing obscene material" for showing the film
405: (1975) A law that prohibits releasing the name of a rape victim is generally unconstitutional.
130:
79:
838:
769:
689:
382:
233:
183:. Applying the Roth test, the Court rules that homosexual content is not by definition obscene.
874:
670:
611:
500:
477:
434:
399:
370:
347:
316:
273:
242:
219:
210:
196:
173:
150:
141:
119:
68:
32:
953:
650:
338:
300:
8:
654:
307:
164:
110:
36:
886:
877:
794:
776:. The Montana State Supreme Court finds law against consensual sodomy unconstitutional.
700:
673:
614:
602:
503:
480:
437:
402:
373:
361:
319:
276:
264:
245:
222:
199:
176:
153:
122:
71:
350:
1038:
936:
904:
865:
858:
780:
717:
633:
627:
491:
421:. A law against consensual sodomy with someone not one's spouse is unconstitutional.
291:
134:
543:
39:. The trend has been one of courts striking down states' attempts to regulate sex.
912:
527:
514:
753:
924:
rules that the state criminal prohibition of sex between unmarried individuals (
894:
785:
641:
327:
83:
737:
591:
1032:
977:
965:
941:
899:
881:
842:
789:
773:
757:
741:
721:
705:
693:
677:
646:
618:
595:
579:
574:
563:
547:
523:
507:
484:
457:
441:
418:
377:
354:
323:
296:
280:
249:
226:
203:
187:
180:
157:
126:
95:
75:
519:
957:
944:
and the
National Coalition for Sexual Freedom regarding internet obscenity)
653:
ruled that the concept of obscenity violated the free speech clause of the
567:
103:
59:
925:
461:
28:
24:
257:
99:
51:
47:
1014:. Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, Mass. 1995
284:
253:
760:. A Tennessee law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional.
708:. A Kentucky law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional.
622:
531:
331:
43:
956:(2017) A law prohibiting registered sex offenders from using
861:(2002) Massachusetts sodomy law declared unconstitutional.
657:
and abolished the offense of obscenity in that state.
16:
Court cases dealing with sexuality and related issues
464:(sex between unmarried persons) is unconstitutional.
129:. A law punishing certain classes of criminals with
91:United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries
1030:
326:. Overturned Massachusetts law that made giving
662:Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. v. Casey
111:Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Williamson
287:material in one's home cannot be made a crime.
631:below. This case was later overturned; see
27:courts have decided several cases regarding
988:Timeline of reproductive rights legislation
680:. Certain abortion restrictions are valid.
299:. Florida Supreme Court finds law against "
248: (1965), 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510
849:finds state's sodomy law unconstitutional.
469:Carey v. Population Services International
426:Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney of Richmond
798:to be unconstitutional as violating the
718:846 S.W.2d 957; 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 451
252:. Laws prohibiting the distribution of
1031:
410:State of Iowa v. Robert Eugene Pilcher
386:overturned as the film is not obscene.
968:for an explanation of these numbers.
78:. A law which allowed the state to
1000:
802:Constitution's privacy protections.
578:, 553 F.Supp. 1121 (N.D.Tex. 1982)
13:
928:) is unconstitutional in light of
14:
1060:
983:Sodomy laws in the United States
645:, 302 Or. 510, 732 P2d 9 (1987)
449:State of New Jersey v. Saunders
391:Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
1:
993:
827:No. MC 01-489, 2001 WL 543734
260:persons are unconstitutional.
1044:United States case law lists
949:Packingham v. North Carolina
902:. The first case to rely on
898:, 280 Kan. 275, 122 P.3d 22
82:the mentally handicapped is
46:" often applies not only to
7:
971:
859:436 Mass. 132, 763 NE.2d 38
839:349 Ark. 600, 80 S.W.3d 332
786:270 Ga. 327, 510 S.E. 2d 18
295:, 257 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1971)
21:United States Supreme Court
10:
1065:
1012:The Margaret Sanger Papers
812:No. 980360311/CC-1059 1998
1049:Case law lists by subject
922:Supreme Court of Virginia
847:Supreme Court of Arkansas
713:City of Dallas v. England
854:GLAD v. Attorney General
733:State of Idaho v. Holden
539:Commonwealth v. Sefranka
460:. A statute prohibiting
704:, 842 S.W.2d 487 (1992)
555:Commonwealth v. Bonadio
530:law against consensual
330:to unmarried persons a
234:Griswold v. Connecticut
701:Commonwealth v. Wasson
560:490 Pa.91, 415 A.2d 47
749:Campbell v. Sundquist
740:(Idaho Ct. App. 1995)
301:crimes against nature
283:. Mere possession of
211:McLaughlin v. Florida
142:Roth v. United States
54:and other sex acts.)
960:is unconstitutional.
940:, (a case involving
880: (2003), 02-102
651:Oregon Supreme Court
534:is unconstitutional.
339:Miller v. California
1008:"Biographical Note"
308:Eisenstadt v. Baird
165:One, Inc. v. Olesen
37:reproductive rights
887:Bowers v. Hardwick
765:Gryczan v. Montana
655:state constitution
603:Bowers v. Hardwick
587:Dronenburg v. Zech
440: (1976) (1976)
362:Jenkins v. Georgia
265:Stanley v. Georgia
937:Nitke v. Gonzales
930:Lawrence v. Texas
920:(Va. 2005). The
905:Lawrence v. Texas
866:Lawrence v. Texas
807:Williams v. State
781:Powell v. Georgia
634:Lawrence v. Texas
628:Powell v. Georgia
492:Stump v. Sparkman
292:Franklin v. State
1056:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1019:
1004:
913:Martin v. Ziherl
834:Jegley v. Picado
726:State v. Morales
685:State v. Morales
515:People v. Onofre
383:Carnal Knowledge
135:unconstitutional
1064:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1017:
1015:
1006:
1005:
1001:
996:
974:
594:(D.C.Cir.1984)
546:, (Mass. 1980)
33:sexual activity
17:
12:
11:
5:
1062:
1052:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1025:
1024:
998:
997:
995:
992:
991:
990:
985:
980:
973:
970:
962:
961:
945:
933:
918:607 S.E.2d 367
909:
895:State v. Limon
891:
862:
850:
830:
822:Doe v. Ventura
818:
803:
777:
761:
754:926 S.W.2d 250
745:
729:
709:
697:
690:826 S.W.2d 201
681:
658:
642:State v. Henry
638:
599:
583:
571:
551:
544:414 N.E.2d 602
535:
528:New York State
520:415 N.E.2d 936
511:
488:
465:
445:
422:
415:242 N.W.2d 348
406:
387:
358:
335:
328:contraceptives
304:
288:
261:
230:
207:
184:
161:
138:
107:
87:
84:constitutional
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1061:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1013:
1009:
1003:
999:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
978:Landmark case
976:
975:
969:
967:
966:Case citation
959:
955:
954:582 U.S. ___
951:
950:
946:
943:
942:Barbara Nitke
939:
938:
934:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
914:
910:
907:
906:
901:
897:
896:
892:
889:
888:
883:
879:
876:
872:
868:
867:
863:
860:
856:
855:
851:
848:
844:
840:
836:
835:
831:
828:
824:
823:
819:
816:
813:
809:
808:
804:
801:
797:
796:
791:
787:
783:
782:
778:
775:
771:
767:
766:
762:
759:
756:(Tn.App.1996)
755:
751:
750:
746:
743:
739:
735:
734:
730:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:
710:
707:
703:
702:
698:
695:
691:
687:
686:
682:
679:
675:
672:
668:
664:
663:
659:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
639:
636:
635:
630:
629:
624:
620:
616:
613:
609:
605:
604:
600:
597:
593:
592:741 F.2d 1388
589:
588:
584:
581:
577:
576:
575:Baker v. Wade
572:
569:
565:
561:
557:
556:
552:
549:
545:
541:
540:
536:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
512:
509:
505:
502:
498:
494:
493:
489:
486:
482:
479:
475:
471:
470:
466:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
446:
443:
439:
436:
432:
428:
427:
423:
420:
416:
412:
411:
407:
404:
401:
397:
393:
392:
388:
385:
384:
379:
375:
372:
368:
364:
363:
359:
356:
352:
349:
345:
341:
340:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
314:
310:
309:
305:
302:
298:
294:
293:
289:
286:
282:
278:
275:
271:
267:
266:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
240:
236:
235:
231:
228:
224:
221:
217:
213:
212:
208:
205:
201:
198:
194:
190:
189:
188:Poe v. Ullman
185:
182:
178:
175:
171:
167:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
144:
143:
139:
136:
132:
131:sterilization
128:
124:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
77:
73:
70:
66:
62:
61:
57:
56:
55:
53:
49:
45:
40:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
1016:. Retrieved
1011:
1002:
963:
958:social media
947:
935:
929:
911:
903:
893:
885:
864:
852:
832:
820:
805:
799:
793:
779:
770:942 P.2d 112
763:
747:
738:890 P.2d 341
731:
725:
711:
699:
683:
676: (1992)
660:
640:
632:
626:
617: (1986)
601:
585:
573:
568:Pennsylvania
553:
537:
522:(N.Y. 1980)
513:
506: (1978)
490:
483: (1977)
467:
454:381 A.2d 333
447:
424:
408:
389:
381:
376: (1974)
360:
353: (1973)
337:
322: (1972)
306:
290:
263:
232:
225: (1964)
209:
202: (1961)
186:
179: (1958)
163:
156: (1957)
140:
125: (1942)
109:
104:Comstock act
89:
60:Buck v. Bell
58:
50:but also to
41:
23:and various
18:
926:fornication
462:fornication
456:(N.J. 1977)
417:(Iowa 1976)
279: (1969)
102:1936). The
96:86 F.2d 737
74: (1927)
29:pornography
1033:Categories
1018:2006-10-21
994:References
562:(Pa. 1980)
25:U.S. state
815:Lexis 260
80:sterilize
1039:Sex laws
972:See also
100:2nd Cir.
52:oral sex
48:anal sex
841:(2002)
724:Citing
720:(1993)
692:(1992)
637:below.)
285:obscene
258:married
254:condoms
795:Bowers
788:(1998)
772:(1997)
623:Sodomy
532:sodomy
332:felony
44:sodomy
35:, and
873:
800:state
669:
610:
566:. A
526:. A
499:
476:
433:
398:
369:
346:
315:
272:
241:
218:
195:
172:
149:
118:
67:
964:See
875:U.S.
671:U.S.
649:The
612:U.S.
501:U.S.
478:U.S.
435:U.S.
400:U.S.
371:U.S.
348:U.S.
317:U.S.
274:U.S.
243:U.S.
220:U.S.
197:U.S.
174:U.S.
151:U.S.
120:U.S.
69:U.S.
19:The
916:,
878:558
871:539
674:833
667:505
615:186
608:478
504:349
497:435
481:678
474:431
438:901
431:425
403:469
396:420
374:453
367:418
344:413
320:438
313:405
277:557
270:394
256:to
246:479
239:381
223:184
216:379
200:497
193:367
177:371
170:355
154:476
147:354
133:is
123:535
116:316
72:200
65:274
1035::
1010:.
952:,
869:,
857:,
845:.
837:,
825:,
810:,
784:,
768:,
752:,
736:,
716:,
688:,
665:,
621:.
606:,
590:,
558:,
542:,
518:,
495:,
472:,
452:,
429:,
413:,
394:,
365:,
351:15
342:,
311:,
268:,
237:,
214:,
191:,
168:,
145:,
114:,
94:,
63:,
31:,
1021:.
932:.
900:*
890:.
882:*
843:*
790:*
774:*
758:*
742:*
722:*
706:*
694:*
678:*
647:*
619:*
596:*
580:*
564:*
548:*
524:*
508:*
485:*
458:*
442:*
419:*
378:*
355:*
334:.
324:*
297:*
281:*
250:*
227:*
204:*
181:*
158:*
137:.
127:*
98:(
86:.
76:*
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.