Knowledge

falsification - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

112:” Developing Hayek’s claim, Michael Wohlgemuth argues that democratic constitutions limit the scope of both preference falsification and knowledge falsification (he coins the term “opinion falsification” as an aggregate concept that captures both knowledge and preference falsification). Democratic constitutions facilitate, on the one hand, the process of filtering out of public discourses contrived public knowledge and public preferences and, on the other, the discovery of knowledge and preferences that individuals keep private. 50:
falsification, knowledge falsification need not be a response solely, or even mainly, to pressures from the state or some other organized political entity. The source of pressures is partly individuals seeking to display conformity to an agenda that appears politically popular. In any given context, knowledge falsification may end abruptly, through a self-reinforcing shift in public opinion.
120:
conformist pressures that induce knowledge falsification. The latter category of institutions includes norms that enhance the social status of heretics, eccentrics, truth-tellers, artists, and comedians for the enrichment they bring to the pool of public knowledge. The celebration of disseminating controversial knowledge should be limited, Blackford holds, only in cases of dehumanizing
76:
disasters are inevitable.” On that basis, he argues that leaders, legislatures, corporations, schools, and committees should deliberately promote their own exposure to dissenting discourses. Courts work better, he shows, when their decision-making bodies include people who bring to evaluations diverse information and interpretations of facts.
79:
Building on Sunstein’s insights, Graham McDonough argues that knowledge falsification can undermine a central aim of moral education: making the personal judgments needed to maintain personal relationships. It can do so by impairing the communication of reasonable differences and, in the process,
49:
Such misrepresentation is a response to perceived social, economic, and political pressures. The perceived pressures could be partly, if not fully, imaginary. The pressures may be rooted in speech controls imposed by a state and enforced through state-enforced punishments. But, as with preference
67:
Knowledge falsification not only misinforms others about social reality, observes Learry Gagné, it also leads to widespread self-deception. Because people systematically underestimate others’ motivations to keep private knowledge out of the public domain, they find it easy to accept beliefs that
119:
holds that meaningful social deliberation requires the freedoms to express thoughts and to pursue knowledge wherever it leads. Building on that tradition, Russell Blackford notes that societies need institutional defenses not only against government efforts to control knowledge but also against
75:
argues that societies benefit from institutions aimed at minimizing it. He observes: “Knowledge falsification, bred by the natural human inclination to defer to the crowd, can create serious problems for the crowd itself. If members of the crowd are not revealing what they know, errors and even
58:
Among the effects of knowledge falsification is the distortion, corruption, and impoverishment of knowledge in the public domain. Society is denied exposure to what is believed to be true, and it gets exposed instead to information that its bearers consider false. A further effect is widespread
83:
On any given issue, the prevalence of knowledge falsification may vary systematically across demographic groups that differ in endured social, cultural, and political pressures. And, the members of any given demographic group may differ in what knowledge they convey to others, depending on the
63:
and about the potential advantages of reforms. Knowledge falsification can also bring intellectual narrowness and ossification, harming innovation. Yet another possible consequence is the persistence of policies, customs, norms, fashions, and institutions that are widely disliked. 
46:. Successful misrepresentation of one's private preferences requires hiding the knowledge on which they rest. Thus, people engage in preference falsification, or bolster it, by misrepresenting their information, interpretations, and understanding. 108:’s views about the advantages of democracy. “Democracy is, above all, a process of forming opinion,” wrote Hayek, and “it is in its dynamic, rather than its static, aspects that the value of democracy proves itself 68:
appear widespread. In reinforcing one another’s incentives to falsify knowledge, members of a community also keep one another from gaining awareness of the mechanisms through which they deceive themselves.
80:
curtailing epistemological diversity. Airing differences in understandings facilitates the construction of politically, ethically, and epistemically satisfying moral guidelines.       
124:. This exception brings into play multiple widely accepted principles, so it must be handled on a case by case basis, but always with attention to maintaining incentives to publicize useful knowledge. 96:
differ systematically depending on survey mode. On controversial matters of discrimination, Americans appear more willing to reveal pertinent knowledge online than offline.        
480: 453: 42:, knowledge falsification is usually undertaken to signal a preference that differs from one’s private preference, in other words, to support 677: 603: 463: 224: 704: 490: 386: 359: 332: 305: 278: 251: 376: 349: 322: 295: 268: 241: 214: 726: 751: 22:
is the deliberate misrepresentation of what one knows under perceived social pressures. The term was coined by
731: 746: 554: 741: 183: 168: 43: 39: 406: 8: 736: 148: 756: 648: 535: 434: 700: 673: 652: 640: 599: 574: 570: 539: 527: 486: 459: 438: 426: 382: 355: 328: 301: 274: 247: 220: 193: 178: 632: 566: 519: 418: 133: 116: 89: 694: 667: 593: 523: 105: 216:
Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
28:
Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
621:"Democracy and Opinion Falsification: Towards a New Austrian Political Economy" 507: 143: 93: 60: 636: 720: 644: 578: 531: 430: 422: 173: 72: 188: 620: 121: 85: 23: 138: 99: 555:"Expanding Discrimination Research: Beyond Ethnicity and to the Web*" 407:"Non-rational compliance with social norms: sincere and hypocritical" 158: 153: 669:
The Tyranny of Opinion: Conformity and the Future of Liberalism
71:
Focusing on the inefficiencies of knowledge falsification,
163: 595:
The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition
508:"Why dissent is a vital concept in moral education" 100:
Institutions for minimizing knowledge falsification
246:. Harvard University Press. pp. 19, 177–178. 219:. Harvard University Press. pp. 19, 157–243. 115:An intellectual tradition going back at least to 718: 552: 381:. Harvard University Press. pp. 196–243. 354:. Harvard University Press. pp. 176–195. 327:. Harvard University Press. pp. 247–288. 300:. Harvard University Press. pp. 119–123. 273:. Harvard University Press. pp. 76–83. 104:The observations of Kuran and Sunstein echo 553:Kuran, Timur; McCaffery, Edward J. (2004). 92:show that publicly conveyed perceptions of 618: 699:. Bloomsbury. pp. 7, 9–11, 195–226. 692: 665: 505: 16:Deliberate misrepresentation of knowledge 478: 458:. Harvard University Press. p. 20. 451: 719: 672:. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 92. 591: 404: 374: 347: 320: 293: 266: 239: 212: 400: 398: 598:. Routledge. pp. 174, 57–198. 13: 619:Wohlgemuth, Michael (2002-09-01). 14: 768: 395: 53: 38:According to Kuran’s analysis of 625:Constitutional Political Economy 571:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00241.x 686: 659: 612: 585: 546: 499: 472: 445: 368: 341: 314: 287: 260: 233: 206: 1: 506:McDonough, Graham P. (2010). 199: 524:10.1080/03057240.2010.521373 485:. Harvard University Press. 7: 693:Blackford, Russell (2019). 666:Blackford, Russell (2019). 378:Private Truths, Public Lies 351:Private Truths, Public Lies 324:Private Truths, Public Lies 297:Private Truths, Public Lies 270:Private Truths, Public Lies 243:Private Truths, Public Lies 127: 10: 773: 512:Journal of Moral Education 482:Why Societies Need Dissent 479:Sunstein, Cass R. (2003). 455:Why Societies Need Dissent 452:Sunstein, Cass R. (2003). 411:Social Science Information 33: 559:Social Science Quarterly 423:10.1177/0539018407079726 184:Social desirability bias 169:Preference falsification 84:audience. In this vein, 44:preference falsification 40:preference falsification 637:10.1023/A:1016156332351 20:Knowledge falsification 727:Sociology of knowledge 696:The Tyranny of Opinion 405:GagnĂ©, Learry (2007). 752:Motivational theories 592:Hayek, F. A. (2020). 375:Kuran, Timur (1995). 348:Kuran, Timur (1995). 321:Kuran, Timur (1995). 294:Kuran, Timur (1995). 267:Kuran, Timur (1995). 240:Kuran, Timur (1995). 213:Kuran, Timur (1995). 732:Social epistemology 149:Epistemic community 747:Political concepts 679:978-1-350-05602-2 605:978-0-429-63797-1 465:978-0-674-01768-9 226:978-0-674-70758-0 194:Spiral of silence 179:Signalling theory 764: 742:Social influence 711: 710: 690: 684: 683: 663: 657: 656: 616: 610: 609: 589: 583: 582: 550: 544: 543: 503: 497: 496: 476: 470: 469: 449: 443: 442: 402: 393: 392: 372: 366: 365: 345: 339: 338: 318: 312: 311: 291: 285: 284: 264: 258: 257: 237: 231: 230: 210: 134:Common knowledge 117:John Stuart Mill 90:Edward McCaffery 59:ignorance about 772: 771: 767: 766: 765: 763: 762: 761: 717: 716: 715: 714: 707: 691: 687: 680: 664: 660: 617: 613: 606: 590: 586: 551: 547: 504: 500: 493: 477: 473: 466: 450: 446: 403: 396: 389: 373: 369: 362: 346: 342: 335: 319: 315: 308: 292: 288: 281: 265: 261: 254: 238: 234: 227: 211: 207: 202: 130: 106:Friedrich Hayek 102: 61:policy failures 56: 36: 17: 12: 11: 5: 770: 760: 759: 754: 749: 744: 739: 734: 729: 713: 712: 705: 685: 678: 658: 631:(3): 223–246. 611: 604: 584: 565:(3): 713–730. 545: 498: 491: 471: 464: 444: 394: 387: 367: 360: 340: 333: 313: 306: 286: 279: 259: 252: 232: 225: 204: 203: 201: 198: 197: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 171: 166: 161: 156: 151: 146: 144:Disinformation 141: 136: 129: 126: 101: 98: 94:discrimination 55: 54:Social effects 52: 35: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 769: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 738: 735: 733: 730: 728: 725: 724: 722: 708: 706:9781350056022 702: 698: 697: 689: 681: 675: 671: 670: 662: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 615: 607: 601: 597: 596: 588: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 549: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 502: 494: 492:9780674017689 488: 484: 483: 475: 467: 461: 457: 456: 448: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 401: 399: 390: 388:9780674707580 384: 380: 379: 371: 363: 361:9780674707580 357: 353: 352: 344: 336: 334:9780674707580 330: 326: 325: 317: 309: 307:9780674707580 303: 299: 298: 290: 282: 280:9780674707580 276: 272: 271: 263: 255: 253:9780674707580 249: 245: 244: 236: 228: 222: 218: 217: 209: 205: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 174:Secret ballot 172: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 155: 152: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 125: 123: 118: 113: 111: 107: 97: 95: 91: 87: 81: 77: 74: 73:Cass Sunstein 69: 65: 62: 51: 47: 45: 41: 31: 29: 25: 21: 695: 688: 668: 661: 628: 624: 614: 594: 587: 562: 558: 548: 515: 511: 501: 481: 474: 454: 447: 414: 410: 377: 370: 350: 343: 323: 316: 296: 289: 269: 262: 242: 235: 215: 208: 189:Social proof 114: 109: 103: 82: 78: 70: 66: 57: 48: 37: 27: 26:in his book 19: 18: 122:hate speech 24:Timur Kuran 737:Conformity 721:Categories 518:(4): 431. 417:(3): 457. 200:References 139:Conformity 757:Deception 653:146608600 645:1572-9966 579:0038-4941 540:144036733 532:0305-7240 439:144128186 431:0539-0184 159:Knowledge 154:Fake news 128:See also 34:Motives 703:  676:  651:  643:  602:  577:  538:  530:  489:  462:  437:  429:  385:  358:  331:  304:  277:  250:  223:  649:S2CID 536:S2CID 435:S2CID 164:Lying 86:Kuran 701:ISBN 674:ISBN 641:ISSN 600:ISBN 575:ISSN 528:ISSN 487:ISBN 460:ISBN 427:ISSN 383:ISBN 356:ISBN 329:ISBN 302:ISBN 275:ISBN 248:ISBN 221:ISBN 88:and 633:doi 567:doi 520:doi 419:doi 723:: 647:. 639:. 629:13 627:. 623:. 573:. 563:85 561:. 557:. 534:. 526:. 516:39 514:. 510:. 433:. 425:. 415:46 413:. 409:. 397:^ 30:. 709:. 682:. 655:. 635:: 608:. 581:. 569:: 542:. 522:: 495:. 468:. 441:. 421:: 391:. 364:. 337:. 310:. 283:. 256:. 229:. 110:.

Index

Timur Kuran
preference falsification
preference falsification
policy failures
Cass Sunstein
Kuran
Edward McCaffery
discrimination
Friedrich Hayek
John Stuart Mill
hate speech
Common knowledge
Conformity
Disinformation
Epistemic community
Fake news
Knowledge
Lying
Preference falsification
Secret ballot
Signalling theory
Social desirability bias
Social proof
Spiral of silence
Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
ISBN
978-0-674-70758-0
Private Truths, Public Lies
ISBN
9780674707580

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑