198:
284:, there is a wide range of views regarding how political deliberation becomes possible within particular governmental regimes. Political philosophy embraces deliberation alternatively as a crucial component or as the death-knell of democratic systems. Contemporary democratic theory contrasts democracy with authoritarian regimes. This leads to differing definitions of deliberation within political philosophy. In a broad sense, deliberation involves interaction guided by specific norms, rules, or boundaries. Deliberative ideals often include "face-to-face discussion, the implementation of good public policy, decision making competence, and critical mass."
133:
270:
622:
330:
36:
309:"Existential deliberation" is a term introduced by emotional public sphere theorists. They argue that political deliberation is an inherent state, not a deployable process. Therefore, deliberation is infrequent and possibly occurs only in face-to-face interactions. This concept aligns with radical deliberation insights, suggesting that politics emerges sporadically as potential within an otherwise inert social environment.
411:
paradox. On one hand, these technologies are intertwined with the subjects who utilize them. On the other, discussing the coordinating machine or technology implies an infrastructure organizing society collectively. This notion suggests distancing individuals from the means of their organization, offering a god's-eye view of the social that is coordinated by the movement of its parts.
407:. These theories emphasize political deliberation as a means of engaging diverse perspectives, setting the stage for political possibilities. In their view, radical democracy remains open-ended and susceptible to changes beyond individual influence. Instead, it's shaped by the discourse resulting from contingent gatherings within larger political entities.
410:
Michel
Foucault employs "technologies of discourse" and "mechanisms of power" to explain how deliberation can be hindered or emerge through discourse technologies that give a semblance of agency by reproducing power dynamics among individuals. The concept of "mechanisms" or "technologies" presents a
315:
Advocates of "public deliberation" as an essential democratic practice focus on processes of inclusiveness and interaction in making political decisions. The validity and reliability of public opinion improve with the development of "public judgment" as citizens consider multiple perspectives, weigh
438:
terms "pattern" and "randomness". This cycle relies on counting what's within the police order. The political mechanism facilitates future reconfigurations by adding new elements, reshaping the social fabric, and then returning to equilibrium, ensuring the perpetuity of an incomplete "whole". Once
417:
employs "the democratic paradox" to establish a self-sustaining political model founded on inherent contradictions. These unresolved contradictions fuel productive tensions among subjects who acknowledge each other's right to speak. According to Mouffe, the only stable political foundation is the
433:
Chantal Mouffe and
Jacques Rancière hold contrasting views regarding the conditions of politics. For Mouffe, it involves internal rearrangements of existing social structures through "articulations". Conversely, Rancière sees it as the intrusion of an unaccounted-for externality. In the realm of
312:"Pragmatic deliberation" represents the epistemic variation of existential deliberation, focusing on assisting groups in achieving positive outcomes that both aggregate and reshape the perspectives of the affected public.
390:
Radical deliberation refers to a philosophical view of deliberation inspired by the events of the student revolution in May 1968. It aligns with political theories of radical democracy from figures like
858:
434:
political "arithmetical/geometric" distinctions, there's a clear nod to mechanics or mathematics. Politics endures by perpetuating a dynamic between homeostasis and reconfiguration, akin to what
295:, understood as "prudence" or "practical wisdom", and its exercise by individuals who deliberate in order to discern the positive or negative consequences of potential actions.
174:
In legal settings a jury famously uses deliberation because it is given specific options, like guilty or not guilty, along with information and arguments to evaluate. In "
197:
422:. This signifies that societal re-articulations will persist. Here, process prevails over content: the liberal/popular sovereignty paradox propels radical democracy.
298:
Many modern political philosophers believe that strict norms, rules, or fixed boundaries either in how subjects eligible for political deliberation are formed (
240:; however, there are exceptions. When a jury does not reach a unanimous decision and does not feel it is possible to do so, they declare themselves a "
178:", the aim is for both elected officials and the general public to use deliberation rather than power-struggle as the basis for their vote.
1059:
426:
functions as a mechanism—an interface connecting human and language machinery, fostering the conditions for ongoing reconfiguration: a
1106:
903:
817:
100:
439:
more, it's a rhetorical paradox driving politics—a foundational arbitrariness in determining who can speak and who can't.
1091:
898:
72:
959:
601:
576:
377:
119:
17:
359:
79:
1401:
926:
2063:
1044:
656:
355:
57:
86:
2048:
908:
351:
53:
893:
888:
863:
506:
68:
1908:
1426:
1214:
1142:
878:
827:
168:
2053:
1925:
1493:
1101:
1026:
868:
340:
257:
344:
46:
1835:
1573:
1359:
1264:
982:
566:
175:
287:
The origins of philosophical interest in deliberation can be traced to
Aristotle's concept of
1508:
952:
685:
164:
1728:
255:
One of the most famous dramatic depictions of this phase of a trial in practice is the film
883:
812:
802:
281:
93:
8:
1563:
1503:
1364:
1096:
999:
873:
540:
515:
435:
400:
248:
is declared, and the trial will have to be redone at the discretion of the plaintiff or
1528:
1157:
1064:
993:
807:
779:
764:
742:
649:
626:
303:
1869:
1863:
1621:
1614:
1483:
1324:
1182:
722:
690:
597:
572:
427:
1792:
1629:
1523:
1376:
1076:
1049:
1039:
945:
822:
774:
727:
509: – Psychological tendency of people to think and solve problems in simple ways
497:
186:
2058:
1990:
1703:
1637:
1558:
987:
797:
448:
392:
209:
system, the jury's deliberation in criminal matters can involve both rendering a
1749:
1127:
789:
747:
491:
460:
414:
396:
273:
245:
218:
214:
132:
2042:
1934:
1548:
1533:
1513:
1314:
1299:
1284:
1197:
1192:
1086:
1070:
1009:
842:
759:
642:
454:
1876:
1800:
1770:
1606:
1568:
1518:
1488:
1456:
1446:
1441:
1354:
1334:
1254:
1054:
1033:
1004:
837:
485:
472:
466:
404:
269:
230:
1588:
1478:
1396:
1319:
1269:
1172:
832:
769:
236:
Typically, a jury must come to a unanimous decision before it delivers a
182:
634:
621:
1901:
1710:
1678:
1543:
1468:
1436:
1416:
1289:
1279:
1239:
1219:
1177:
707:
700:
695:
680:
299:
249:
475: – French philosopher, anthropologist and sociologist (1947–2022)
316:
possible options, and accept the outcomes of decisions made together.
1949:
1695:
1693:
1686:
1684:
1661:
1538:
1371:
1349:
1339:
1294:
1274:
1244:
1234:
1209:
1132:
1081:
752:
737:
717:
712:
562:
290:
288:
241:
226:
222:
137:
1821:
329:
147:
is a process of thoughtfully weighing options, for example prior to
35:
1942:
1763:
1671:
1553:
1473:
1431:
1406:
1381:
1329:
1259:
1204:
1167:
1162:
1152:
1147:
1137:
594:
Coming to Public
Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World
160:
2021:
1883:
233:
binding actions by the parties based on the results of the trial.
1997:
1983:
1916:
1849:
1814:
1742:
1498:
1421:
1391:
1344:
1304:
1229:
1187:
237:
210:
27:
Process of thoughtfully weighing options, usually prior to voting
1856:
1777:
1965:
1957:
1828:
1807:
1756:
1735:
1578:
1309:
968:
571:. Translated by Thomson, J.A.K. Penguin Classics. p. 209.
156:
148:
541:"Note, Making Ballot Initiatives Work: Some Assembly Required"
1842:
1784:
1663:
1655:
1451:
1411:
1249:
1111:
488: – Visual representation of the structure of an argument
457: – German American historian and philosopher (1906–1975)
152:
181:
Individual deliberation is also a description of day-to-day
2013:
2005:
1463:
1386:
1224:
665:
206:
937:
1583:
167:
are generally made after deliberation through a vote or
511:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
502:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
1790:
1627:
1604:
520:
Pages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
306:) can hinder deliberation and render it unfeasible.
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
424:The rhetorical gesture of the foundational paradox
418:configuration of the social and the certainty of
2040:
463: – American academic and author (1957–2021)
469: – American political theorist (born 1959)
2019:
2003:
953:
650:
159:as opposed to power-struggle, creativity, or
494: – American legal doctrine and metaphor
1955:
1932:
1923:
1914:
596:(1st ed.). Syracuse University Press.
591:
358:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
302:) or in the types of qualifying arguments (
1060:Four Cardinal Principles and Eight Virtues
960:
946:
657:
643:
264:
664:
561:
378:Learn how and when to remove this message
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
268:
196:
131:
1107:Values in Action Inventory of Strengths
818:Racial discrimination in jury selection
451: – Italian philosopher (born 1942)
319:
14:
2041:
565:(2004-03-30). Tredennick, Hugh (ed.).
941:
638:
538:
420:a penultimate articulation's deferral
151:. Deliberation emphasizes the use of
356:adding citations to reliable sources
323:
58:adding citations to reliable sources
29:
1092:Teachings of the Seven Grandfathers
185:decision-making, and as such is an
24:
592:Yankelovich, Daniel (1991-05-01).
442:
25:
2075:
614:
620:
328:
213:and determining the appropriate
34:
927:Fully Informed Jury Association
192:
45:needs additional citations for
1045:Catalogue of Vices and Virtues
585:
555:
532:
13:
1:
625:The dictionary definition of
525:
221:is whether to agree with the
1694:
1685:
1662:
539:Pedro, Portia (2010-02-01).
518: – type of deliberation
500: – Argumentation scheme
289:
7:
1791:
1628:
1605:
967:
507:Low-information rationality
479:
10:
2080:
1975:
1893:
1720:
1647:
1597:
1120:
1018:
975:
919:
851:
828:Scientific jury selection
788:
673:
265:In political philosophy
2020:
2004:
1956:
1933:
1924:
1915:
852:Specific jurisdictions
568:The Nicomachean Ethics
430:loop within politics.
277:
217:. In civil cases, the
202:
176:deliberative democracy
141:
2064:Group decision-making
1509:Righteous indignation
276:Assembly deliberation
272:
200:
135:
2049:Political philosophy
1027:Bodhipakkhiyā dhammā
813:Peremptory challenge
803:Death-qualified jury
352:improve this section
320:Radical deliberation
282:political philosophy
205:In countries with a
140:deliberating in 1636
136:The city council of
54:improve this article
1097:Theological virtues
1000:Positive psychology
516:Online deliberation
436:N. Katherine Hayles
171:of those involved.
1529:Self-transcendence
1121:Individual virtues
1065:Nine Noble Virtues
994:Nicomachean Ethics
808:Jury questionnaire
780:Summary jury trial
765:Jury sequestration
743:Jury nullification
686:Citizens' assembly
545:Harvard Law Review
399:, Chantal Mouffe,
278:
203:
142:
2036:
2035:
2032:
2031:
1183:Conscientiousness
1050:Epistemic virtues
935:
934:
864:England and Wales
723:Jury instructions
668:-related articles
428:positive feedback
388:
387:
380:
130:
129:
122:
104:
18:Jury deliberation
16:(Redirected from
2071:
2025:
2009:
1961:
1938:
1929:
1920:
1796:
1699:
1690:
1667:
1633:
1610:
1595:
1594:
1524:Self-cultivation
1077:Prussian virtues
1040:Cardinal virtues
962:
955:
948:
939:
938:
823:Strike for cause
775:Juror misconduct
728:Specific finding
674:Primary articles
659:
652:
645:
636:
635:
624:
608:
607:
589:
583:
582:
559:
553:
552:
536:
521:
512:
503:
498:Dialogue mapping
425:
421:
401:Jacques Rancière
383:
376:
372:
369:
363:
332:
324:
294:
229:and rendering a
187:epistemic virtue
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
38:
30:
21:
2079:
2078:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2054:Legal reasoning
2039:
2038:
2037:
2028:
1971:
1889:
1716:
1643:
1593:
1116:
1102:Three Treasures
1019:Virtue families
1014:
988:Moral character
971:
966:
936:
931:
915:
847:
798:Change of venue
784:
669:
663:
617:
612:
611:
604:
590:
586:
579:
560:
556:
537:
533:
528:
519:
510:
501:
482:
449:Giorgio Agamben
445:
443:Other theorists
423:
419:
393:Michel Foucault
384:
373:
367:
364:
349:
333:
322:
304:Jürgen Habermas
267:
195:
165:Group decisions
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
51:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2077:
2067:
2066:
2061:
2056:
2051:
2034:
2033:
2030:
2029:
2027:
2026:
2017:
2010:
2001:
1994:
1987:
1979:
1977:
1973:
1972:
1970:
1969:
1962:
1953:
1946:
1939:
1930:
1921:
1912:
1905:
1897:
1895:
1891:
1890:
1888:
1887:
1880:
1873:
1860:
1853:
1846:
1839:
1832:
1825:
1818:
1811:
1804:
1797:
1788:
1781:
1774:
1767:
1760:
1753:
1746:
1739:
1732:
1724:
1722:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1714:
1707:
1700:
1691:
1682:
1675:
1668:
1659:
1651:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1642:
1641:
1634:
1625:
1618:
1611:
1601:
1599:
1592:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1496:
1491:
1486:
1481:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1374:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1362:
1352:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1327:
1322:
1317:
1312:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1195:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1128:Accountability
1124:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1084:
1079:
1074:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1030:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1013:
1012:
1007:
1002:
997:
990:
985:
979:
977:
973:
972:
965:
964:
957:
950:
942:
933:
932:
930:
929:
923:
921:
917:
916:
914:
913:
912:
911:
906:
901:
899:Jury selection
896:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
855:
853:
849:
848:
846:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
794:
792:
790:Jury selection
786:
785:
783:
782:
777:
772:
767:
762:
757:
756:
755:
748:Jury tampering
745:
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
704:
703:
693:
691:Coroner's jury
688:
683:
677:
675:
671:
670:
662:
661:
654:
647:
639:
633:
632:
616:
615:External links
613:
610:
609:
602:
584:
577:
554:
530:
529:
527:
524:
523:
522:
513:
504:
495:
492:Blank pad rule
489:
481:
478:
477:
476:
470:
464:
461:Lauren Berlant
458:
452:
444:
441:
415:Chantal Mouffe
397:Ernesto Laclau
386:
385:
336:
334:
327:
321:
318:
274:Shimer College
266:
263:
194:
191:
128:
127:
110:September 2007
69:"Deliberation"
42:
40:
33:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2076:
2065:
2062:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2052:
2050:
2047:
2046:
2044:
2024:
2023:
2018:
2016:
2015:
2011:
2008:
2007:
2002:
2000:
1999:
1995:
1993:
1992:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1978:
1974:
1968:
1967:
1963:
1960:
1959:
1954:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1945:
1944:
1940:
1937:
1936:
1931:
1928:
1927:
1922:
1919:
1918:
1913:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1898:
1896:
1892:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1872:
1871:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1859:
1858:
1854:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1838:
1837:
1833:
1831:
1830:
1826:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1817:
1816:
1812:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1803:
1802:
1798:
1795:
1794:
1789:
1787:
1786:
1782:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1773:
1772:
1768:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1745:
1744:
1740:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1731:
1730:
1726:
1725:
1723:
1719:
1713:
1712:
1708:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1692:
1689:
1688:
1683:
1681:
1680:
1676:
1674:
1673:
1669:
1666:
1665:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1653:
1652:
1650:
1646:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1631:
1626:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1617:
1616:
1612:
1609:
1608:
1603:
1602:
1600:
1596:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1549:Sportsmanship
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1514:Righteousness
1512:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1500:
1497:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1427:Nonattachment
1425:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1328:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1308:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1293:
1291:
1288:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1123:
1119:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1087:Seven virtues
1085:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1034:Brahmavihārās
1031:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1011:
1010:Virtue ethics
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
995:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
980:
978:
976:About virtues
974:
970:
963:
958:
956:
951:
949:
944:
943:
940:
928:
925:
924:
922:
918:
910:
907:
905:
904:Nullification
902:
900:
897:
895:
894:U.S. military
892:
891:
890:
889:United States
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
856:
854:
850:
844:
843:Stealth juror
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
795:
793:
791:
787:
781:
778:
776:
773:
771:
768:
766:
763:
761:
760:Jury research
758:
754:
751:
750:
749:
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
702:
699:
698:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
678:
676:
672:
667:
660:
655:
653:
648:
646:
641:
640:
637:
631:at Wiktionary
630:
629:
623:
619:
618:
605:
603:9780815602545
599:
595:
588:
580:
578:9780140449495
574:
570:
569:
564:
558:
550:
546:
542:
535:
531:
517:
514:
508:
505:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
483:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
455:Hannah Arendt
453:
450:
447:
446:
440:
437:
431:
429:
416:
412:
408:
406:
402:
398:
394:
382:
379:
371:
361:
357:
353:
347:
346:
342:
337:This section
335:
331:
326:
325:
317:
313:
310:
307:
305:
301:
296:
293:
292:
285:
283:
275:
271:
262:
260:
259:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:jury decision
216:
212:
208:
199:
190:
188:
184:
179:
177:
172:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
139:
134:
124:
121:
113:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
49:
48:
43:This article
41:
37:
32:
31:
19:
2012:
1996:
1989:
1982:
1964:
1948:
1941:
1907:
1900:
1882:
1875:
1868:
1862:
1855:
1848:
1841:
1834:
1827:
1820:
1813:
1806:
1799:
1783:
1776:
1771:Brahmacharya
1769:
1762:
1755:
1748:
1741:
1734:
1727:
1709:
1702:
1677:
1670:
1654:
1636:
1620:
1613:
1569:Tranquillity
1519:Self-control
1489:Renunciation
1447:Philanthropy
1442:Perspicacity
1402:Magnificence
1355:Intelligence
1335:Impartiality
1255:Faithfulness
1143:Authenticity
1069:
1055:Five virtues
1032:
1025:
1005:Trait theory
992:
838:Special jury
733:Deliberation
732:
627:
593:
587:
567:
557:
548:
544:
534:
486:Argument map
473:Bruno Latour
467:Bonnie Honig
432:
413:
409:
405:Alain Badiou
389:
374:
365:
350:Please help
338:
314:
311:
308:
297:
286:
279:
258:12 Angry Men
256:
254:
235:
204:
193:Trial juries
180:
173:
145:Deliberation
144:
143:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
64:
52:Please help
47:verification
44:
1589:Workmanship
1479:Punctuality
1397:Magnanimity
1320:Hospitality
1270:Forgiveness
1215:Discernment
1173:Cleanliness
833:Struck jury
770:Jury stress
2043:Categories
1902:Auctoritas
1750:Aparigraha
1729:Adhiṭṭhāna
1711:Sophrosyne
1679:Eutrapelia
1564:Temperance
1544:Solidarity
1534:Simplicity
1494:Resilience
1469:Politeness
1437:Patriotism
1417:Moderation
1290:Good faith
1280:Generosity
1240:Equanimity
1220:Discipline
1178:Compassion
708:Petit jury
701:Indictment
696:Grand jury
681:Jury trial
628:deliberate
526:References
300:John Rawls
250:prosecutor
231:resolution
80:newspapers
1950:Humanitas
1696:Phronesis
1687:Philotimo
1539:Sincerity
1504:Reverence
1372:Judgement
1360:Emotional
1350:Integrity
1340:Innocence
1295:Gratitude
1275:Frugality
1265:Foresight
1245:Etiquette
1235:Endurance
1210:Diligence
1133:Alertness
1082:Scout Law
983:Endowment
869:Hong Kong
753:Embracery
738:Hung jury
718:Jury fees
713:Jury duty
563:Aristotle
551:(4): 959.
368:July 2023
339:does not
291:phronesis
242:hung jury
227:defendant
223:plaintiff
169:consensus
138:The Hague
1943:Gravitas
1926:Dignitas
1672:Ataraxia
1554:Sympathy
1484:Religion
1474:Prudence
1432:Patience
1407:Meekness
1382:Kindness
1330:Humility
1325:Humanity
1260:Fidelity
1205:Courtesy
1168:Chivalry
1163:Chastity
1153:Charisma
1148:Calmness
1138:Altruism
879:Scotland
480:See also
246:mistrial
215:sentence
183:rational
161:dialogue
1998:Sadaqah
1984:Ganbaru
1917:Decorum
1909:Caritas
1864:Śraddhā
1850:Shaucha
1815:Kshanti
1743:Akrodha
1598:Chinese
1499:Respect
1422:Modesty
1392:Loyalty
1377:Justice
1345:Insight
1305:Honesty
1300:Heroism
1230:Empathy
1188:Courage
1158:Charity
1071:Pāramīs
969:Virtues
360:removed
345:sources
238:verdict
225:or the
211:verdict
94:scholar
2059:Juries
1966:Virtus
1958:Pietas
1877:Upekṣā
1870:Saddhā
1836:Prajñā
1829:Muditā
1808:Kshama
1801:Karuṇā
1764:Asteya
1757:Ārjava
1736:Ahimsa
1721:Indian
1704:Sophia
1579:Wisdom
1457:Filial
1365:Social
1310:Honour
920:Groups
884:Taiwan
859:Canada
600:
575:
403:, and
201:A jury
157:reason
149:voting
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
2022:Virtù
1976:Other
1935:Fides
1894:Latin
1884:Vīrya
1843:Satya
1822:Mettā
1785:Dhṛti
1664:Arete
1656:Agape
1648:Greek
1574:Trust
1559:Taste
1452:Piety
1412:Mercy
1285:Glory
1250:Faith
1198:Moral
1193:Civil
1112:Yamas
909:Women
874:Japan
244:", a
153:logic
101:JSTOR
87:books
2014:Sisu
2006:Seny
1991:Giri
1857:Sevā
1778:Dāna
1615:Jing
1464:Pity
1387:Love
1315:Hope
1225:Duty
666:Jury
598:ISBN
573:ISBN
343:any
341:cite
207:jury
155:and
73:news
1793:Hrī
1630:Ren
1584:Wit
549:123
354:by
280:In
56:by
2045::
1638:Yi
1622:Li
1607:De
547:.
543:.
395:,
261:.
252:.
189:.
163:.
1867:/
961:e
954:t
947:v
658:e
651:t
644:v
606:.
581:.
381:)
375:(
370:)
366:(
362:.
348:.
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
