J. S. Verma - Knowledge

525:, under Article 356 the scope of such review would be limited. There was a narrow area which was justiciable by the court with deference awarded to the decision of the executive. This was on the basis that the exercise of the power of proclamation was a political one with a wide area of discretion which would often involve a great deal of political judgment. It is difficult to evolve judicially manageable norms on the basis of which to scrutinise decisions which are often highly subjective and based on a wide array of socio-political and economic factors. Justice Verma stated that only cases which permit application of totally objective standards for deciding whether the constitutional machinery has failed are amenable to judicial review and the remaining cases where there is any significant area of subjective satisfaction are not justiciable because of a lack of judicially manageable standards for resolving the controversy. The latter cases are subject only to political scrutiny i.e. through elections. 264: 280: 683:(13 September 1997) is considered one of the world's landmark judgments in gender justice. It was brought as a class action by certain NGO's and social activists following the brutal gang rape of a social worker in Rajasthan to enforce the fundamental rights of working women under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court laid down guidelines to deal with the menace of sexual harassment at the workplace through an approach based on equal access, prevention, and empowerment. This approach was the foundation for national and international best practice in dealing with sexual harassment at the workplace. 601:. The court did this on purely technical grounds, observing that the tribunal had erred in accepting the government's plea that sensitive intelligence inputs are 'classified' and cannot be disclosed in court. Justice Verma stated that the tribunal could not have made the necessary subjective judgment in that case as it may or may not have known all the facts. The court said that the tribunal needed to decide whether the material in support of the ban outweighed the material against it on the basis of 'greater probabilities,' a term coined by Justice Verma and never actually explained. In this process, the requirement of 33: 779:

1999. All the High Courts in the country also adopted the same in their full court meetings. The goal was to create a resolution which would bind the judiciary for the purposes of independence, integrity, accountability, honesty and transparency. The "Restatement of Values" is meant to be an illustrative (not exhaustive) declaration of what is expected of a Judge. The Resolution was preceded by a draft statement circulated to all the High Courts of the country and suitably redrafted in the light of the suggestions which were received.

448:

the higher judiciary but stated that the difference is between the law as it is and the law as it should be. He said that "judicial activism can supply the deficiencies and fill gaps in an already existing structure found deficient in some ways, but it must stop short of building a new edifice where there is none." The majority position would also prove problematic to the principles of independence of the judiciary and the constitutional scheme of the hierarchy of the courts.

831:

life, liberty, equality and dignity of the people of the state. It is, of course, essential to heal the wounds and to look to a future of peace and harmony. But the pursuit of these high objectives must be based on justice and the upholding of the values of the Constitution of the Republic and the laws of the land. That is why it remains of fundamental importance that the measures that require to be taken to bring the violators of human rights to book are indeed taken".

935:. The Committee was assisted by a team of young lawyers, law students and academics. The Committee's counsel, Abhishek Tewari, Advocate was overall in charge of the preparation of the report. He was assisted by: Talha Abdul Rahman, Prof. Mrinal Satish, Shwetasree Majumdar, Saumya Saxena, Preetika Mathur, Siddharth Peter de Souza, Anubha Kumar, Apoorv Kurup, Devansh Mohta, Jigar Patel, Nikhil Mehra, Nishit Agrawal, Shyam Nandan, Nithyaesh Natraj and Salman Hashmi. 494:), the majority took the view that the opinion of the judiciary does not have primacy in the matter of appointments of judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The primacy is with the central government, which is to take the decision after consulting all the constitutional functionaries. The central government is not bound to act in accordance with the opinion of all the constitutional functionaries consulted even if their opinion is the same. 554:

this aspect and indicates that it is in this manner the concept of secularism embodied in the Constitutional scheme as a creed adopted by the Indian people has to be understood whilst examining the constitutional validity of any legislation on the touchstone of the Constitution. The concept of secularism is one facet of the right to equality woven as the central golden thread in the fabric depicting the pattern of the scheme in the Constitution.

463:

remedy for enforcement and protection of fundamental rights. The award of monetary compensation is a justifiable remedy when it is the only practical method of redress available for contraventions of fundamental rights by the state or its servants in purported exercise of its powers. The Supreme Court relied on Article 9 (5) of the

459:

addition to the private law remedy in tort for damages. Justice Verma stated that the award of compensation in a proceeding under Article 32 of the Constitution of India or by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is a public law remedy which is based on strict liability for the breach of fundamental rights.

725:

into and, it is found that there is substance in the allegation, the victim should be suitably compensated by the State and the requisite sanction under Section 6 of the Central Act should be granted for institution of prosecution and/or a civil suit or other proceedings against the person/persons responsible for such violation."

692:

treaties and agreements to fill the gaps in the law. "Any International Convention not inconsistent with fundamental rights and in harmony with its spirit must be read into Articles 14, 15, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution to enlarge the meaning and content thereof, to promote the object of the constitutional guarantee."

606:

deliver a judgment in favor of religious minorities and in opposition to the government, even though the facts were in favour of the government, by taking recourse to technical grounds and without making any subjective assessment of the charge of sedition, which may have required him to deliver exactly the converse judgment.

939:

that the issue of sexual assault against women is one that goes to the core of social norms and values. The Report also deals with the construct of gender justice in India and the various obstructions to this. The Committee's approach is founded on achieving the guarantee of equality for all in the Constitution of India.

717:

the persons found responsible for such violations should be suitably punished under the Army Act of 1950." The court also then pointed out that there are safeguards within the powers exercisable under the Act. Parliament included these safeguards to check the arbitrary exercise of power by the armed forces.

643:

persons practising any religion other than the Hindu religion... and it may well be that these words are used in a speech to emphasise the way of life of the Indian people and the Indian cultural ethos...There is no such presumption permissible in law contrary to the several Constitution Bench decisions.

938:

The Committee adopted a multidisciplinary approach interpreting its mandate expansively. The Report deals with sexual crimes at all levels and with the measures needed for prevention as well as punishment of all offences with sexual overtones that are on affront to human dignity. This is on the basis

903:

Justice Verma had also publicly stated that the judiciary should be brought within the ambit of the Right to Information Act 2005: "To ensure transparency and accountability in public eye, I strongly feel that judiciary should be brought into the ambit of Right to Information Act. When hearing of all

716:

The Supreme Court held that "the instructions in the form of do's and don't's have to be treated as binding instructions which are required to be followed by the members of the armed forces exercising powers under the Central Act and a serious note should be taken of violation of the instructions and

432:

is fairness in action by the state. It is difficult to accept that the state can be permitted to act otherwise in any field of its activity, irrespective of the nature of its function. This requirement must be satisfied by every action of the state or an instrumental body of the state in order for it

830:

incident and continuing with the violence that rocked the state for over two months, have greatly saddened the nation. There is no doubt, in the opinion of this Commission, that there was a comprehensive failure on the part of the state government to control the persistent violation of the rights to

757:

was enacted with a view to check further deforestation which ultimately results in ecological imbalance and therefore, the provisions made therein for the conservation of forests and fore matters connected therewith, must apply to all forests irrespective of the nature of ownership or classification

668:

judgement, has said that nobody should be allowed to misuse religion for electoral gains and has termed it as a 'corrupt practice'. However, Supreme Court declined a plea to check the “devastating consequences” of its 1995 judgment defining Hindutva as a "way of life" and nothing to do with "narrow

634:

The issue related to three speeches given by Bal Thakeray in the election campaign for Dr. Prabhoo which the High Court held had used intemperate language and were incendiary in nature. The High Court also found that the speeches also tended to promote enmity and hatred between the different classes

458:

A mother of a 22-year-old man who had died in police custody wrote a letter to the Supreme Court which the court treated as a writ petition. A rs 1.5 lakh compensation was awarded by the Supreme Court to the mother, as Justice Verma held that compensation was a public law remedy distinct from and in

724:

In order that the people may feel assured that there is an effective check against misuse or abuse of powers by the members of the armed forces it is necessary that a complaint containing an allegation about misuse or abuse of the powers conferred under the Central Act should be thoroughly inquired

711:

Ensure that troop under command do not harass innocent people, destroy property of the public or unnecessarily enter into the house/dwelling of people not connected with any unlawful activities. Ensure that women are not searched/arrested without the presence of female police. In fact, women should

553:

it is clear from the constitutional scheme that it guarantees equality in the matter of religion to all individuals and groups irrespective of their faith emphasising that there is no religion of the state itself. The Preamble of the Constitution read in particular with Articles 25 to 28 emphasises

778:

Justice Verma is remembered as the judiciary's conscience keeper for his "restatement of values of judicial life." This was as a code of ethics for the judiciary in India that he instigated while Chief Justice. This was ratified and adopted by the Indian Judiciary in the Chief Justices' Conference

447:

Justice Verma dissented saying that Parliament had not intended a member of the higher judiciary to be designated a 'public servant' for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act as amended. Justice Verma recognised the need for an appropriate mechanism to deal with corruption by members of

443:

A petition was filed by a former high court chief justice in the Supreme Court arguing that he could not be proceeded against under the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947. This was on the basis that he was not a public servant for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The majority of

966:

His legacy is carried on by the Justice Verma Foundation, whose mission is " to make the law a friend to those most in need of one." It focuses on providing quality pro bono representation to those most in need of it in High Courts and the Supreme Court. It does this by acting as a facilitator to

873:

These issues seriously impinge on the provisions of the Constitution that guarantee equality before the law and equal protection of the laws within the territory of India, and the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth...Many of the largest rescue

686:

Justice Verma held that each incident of sexual harassment constitutes a violation of the fundamental rights of 'gender equality', 'right to life and liberty' and the right to practice any profession or to carry out any occupation, trade or business under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of

497:

In the Second Judges case, the court felt that the approach in the First Judges case threatened the principles of independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers with danger of the politicisation of judicial appointments. The court also felt that this approach potentially minimised the

691:

is also a seminal and definitive judgment in the field of constitutional jurisprudence and the relationship between international law and domestic law. The court held that in the absence of domestic legislation addressing this issue the court would rely on India's obligations under international

642:

It is a fallacy and an error of law to proceed on the assumption that any reference to Hindutva or Hinduism in a speech makes it automatically a speech based on Hindu religion as opposed to other religions or that the use of the word Hindutva or Hinduism per se depicts an attitude hostile to all

630:

1951. This provides that candidates are prohibited from eliciting votes or persuading people not to vote on the grounds of his religion, race, caste, community or language or the use of or appeal to religious symbols. It also prohibits the promotion of or attempt to promote feelings of enmity or

483:

system for the appointment of the judiciary in India. The court held that the executive and the judiciary are to reach their decision together, given that both have a vital role in the joint venture. It is only if there is irresolvable disagreement between them which cannot be resolved by joint

462:

Justice Verma argued that the principle of sovereign immunity does not apply as a defence in relation to compensation as a public law remedy even though it may be available as a defence in private law action based on tort. Justice Verma stated that compensation is an acknowledged constitutional

605:

had to be satisfied taking into account the public interest. This would require the tribunal to have access to all the necessary information from both sides to carry out judicial scrutiny. Since this did not happen, the order of the tribunal was set aside. In this way, Justice Verma managed to

545:

the disputed area had been acquired and was under the control of the central government until the adjudication of the dispute in relation to the property. The Court struck down provisions which diminished the pending suits in relation to this disputed property without providing an alternative

427:

The state terminated the appointment of all government counsel irrespective of whether the term of the incumbent had expired or not. At the same time, the government directed preparation of fresh panels to make appointments in the place of existing incumbents. The court strongly asserted the

752:

that it is the duty of every generation to preserve natural resources for the next generation. The court relied on the principle of trust as opposed to ownership of natural resources and sought to balance the need for development with preservation of the environment. The court held that

370:

in August 1959. He was appointed the judge there in June 1972. In the following year, he delivered a judgement arguing that a juvenile convicted of murder ought to be tried under separate procedures from an adult. This went on to form the basis for the Juvenile Justice Act in 1986.

736:

This case related to the protection and preservation of the environment free from pollution and maintenance of the ecological balance emphasising the principle of sustainable development. The Supreme Court placed reliance on Article 21 of the Constitution of India but also on the

516:, on his being satisfied that, "a situation has arisen" in which the state government cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution to take action. This enables the state to come under the direct control of the central government. 818:

The NHRC led by Justice Verma brought a petition to the Supreme Court seeking retrial of the Best Bakery case and also four additional cases outside Gujarat after a local court had acquitted the accused. Justice Verma severely indicted the Government of

444:

the Supreme Court held that a former Chief Justice of the High Court of Madras could be proceeded against under the Act. This was on the basis that a judge belonging to the higher judiciary was a public servant for the purposes of the Act.

647:

This was on the basis that 'Hindu', 'Hinduism' and 'Hindutva' are often very wide terms meaning reference to them cannot be subject to a blanket ban. Rather, the context and meaning has to be gauged in the individual speeches in question.

263: 625:

The Bombay High Court had given a judgment against the election of Dr. R.Y Prabhoo (Shiv Sena) declaring his election void on the ground that he had been found guilty of corrupt practices under Subsections 3 and 3A of Section 123 of the

954:

Justice Verma is remembered for his legal innovation and firm commitment to women's empowerment, accountability of judiciary and government, probity in public life, social justice and secularism. He told fresh law graduates of the

428:

requirement that every state action must not be arbitrary even if that state action was in the field of contractual relations between the state and individuals. Justice Verma stated that the basic requirement of Article 14 in the

904:

the cases is done publicly, decisions are pronounced publicly, the administrative actions of the judiciary, especially judicial appointments should be made open to public scrutiny," Justice Verma told a BBC Hindi programme.

585:

to determine whether the people of that province wish to remain in India or secede. Viewing these acts as constituting clear-cut sedition, the Government of India exercised the powers conferred on it by Section 3 (1) of the

565:

In this case Justice Verma upheld the principles of natural justice and judicial protections of freedom of association, freedom of expression under the Indian Constitution in the face of strong political pressure.

851:

He could have stepped in to monitor the situation and issue directives to the competent authorities, but he did not even comment. Nothing came over, except for a formal acknowledgement from the Prime Minister's

411:

In June 1989, he was appointed Judge of the Supreme Court of India, and became Chief Justice of India in January 1998. During his time in the Supreme Court, Justice Verma gave numerous landmark judgments.

347:. He had six brothers and three sisters. He completed his early education at Venkat High School in Satna (Govt. Venkat H.S. Excellence School No.1, Satna), followed by Government Jubilee Intercollege, 1196: 378:, he was one of the first judges to reject the government's proclamation that emergency took precedence over rights to life and liberty. Before the Supreme Court stopped High Courts from entertaining 861:

As stated by Verma, the NHRC report on the 2002 Gujarat violence noted two issues which smacked of discrimination. Whereas a reward of Rs 2 lakhs was announced for the next of kin of victims of the

487:

This was on the basis that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India is formed collectively after taking into account the views of his senior colleagues who are required to be consulted by him.

1913: 2161: 1543: 900:, Justice Verma said: "In a democracy, participatory role in governments can be realised only if the right to information exists so that the public can make an informed choice." 704:

which grants the armed forces special powers in "disturbed areas". Concerns have been raised about the Act on the basis that it grants impunity for human rights violations.

498:

role of the judiciary in appointments when the judiciary would have best knowledge of the legal calibre and acumen of potential appointees in comparison to the executive.

1221: 467:

as an additional ground in order to award compensation as a mode of enforcement of the fundamental 'right to life' when no other mode of enforcement was available.

2592: 878:, did not receive visits at a high political or administrative level till I visited them. This indicated a deeper malaise, discriminatory in origin and character. 956: 942:

The comprehensive 630-page report, which was completed in 29 days, was lauded both nationally and internationally. This eventually led to the passing of the

961:

Each one of you is that 'little drop' who can unite to make the 'rain' needed for the 'monsoon of purity in national character' to revive the parched field

464: 1794: 2587: 1639: 1021: 2263: 1837: 2577: 508:

This case related to a presidential proclamation issued under Section 356 (1) of the Emergency Provisions of Constitution of India dissolving the

1910: 1938: 1477: 594:, declaring it an unlawful association because had been carrying out unlawful activities. Later, a tribunal order endorsed this notification. 2171: 1550: 924: 546:

judicial mechanism for deciding the legal dispute. The provisions through which the property came to be acquired by the centre were upheld.

799:

probe into the following five cases after taking the view that investigations were being hampered by extraneous considerations and people:

597:

The court headed by Justice set aside the order of the tribunal, which had endorsed the government notification, and lifted the ban on the

1767: 823:

at the time of the riots. The NHRC report was quoted by the US when denying Narendra Modi a visa. The NHRC report on 31 May 2002 stated:

2043: 1575: 2195: 1120: 712:

be searched by female police only. Do not ill treat anyone, in particular women and children, no harassment of civilians, no torture."

1173: 788: 297: 91: 484:

effort that the Chief Justice of India would have primacy. It was only in this situation that the question of primacy should arise.

679: 2582: 1360:"International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966" 1665: 627: 2256: 897: 1095: 2602: 1359: 587: 385: 631:

hatred between different classes of the citizens of India on the grounds of religion, race, caste, community or language.

2597: 1882: 1692: 738: 2064: 995: 1810: 943: 707:

The Supreme Court of India in this case clearly stipulated that the following provisions must be read into the AFSPA:

866: 843:

in which he indicted the Gujarat state government for its role in the 2002 violence in the state, and questioned the

1222:"Justice J.S. Verma has sought to make the judiciary stronger and more accountable : Cover Story - India Today" 2567: 2249: 1068: 2276: 839:

As chairman of the National Human Rights Commission, Verma had written a five-page letter to then Prime Minister

796: 701: 635:

of India on the grounds of religion and were appeals to vote for Dr. Prabhoo because of his religion as a Hindu.

290: 1791: 908: 509: 300:

from 1999 to 2003, and chairman of the Justice Verma Committee Report on Amendments to Criminal Law after the

1967: 1911:

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/as-nhrc-head-justice-verma-set-the-stage-for-justice-in-2002-riots/1106909/

754: 271:

administering oath to Justice Jagdish Sharan Verma as Chief Justice of India, at a Swearing-in Ceremony, at

2093: 384:

petitions, Verma "stood out" as one of the few high court judges who released detainees arrested under the

279: 791:(NHRC) from 4 November 1999 to 17 January 2003. He is known for having 'set the stage' for justice in the 519:

The court held that whilst it could review whether a proclamation which imposed the president's rule was

375: 203: 2572: 1993: 622:) is one of Justice Verma's most controversial judgments, which he believed was widely misunderstood. 542: 927:

tasked with reforming and invigorating anti-rape law. His committee members were Ex-Solicitor General

2533: 2373: 2343: 2313: 1521: 920: 844: 392: 367: 301: 167: 148: 304:. He remains one of India's most highly regarded Chief Justices and eminent jurists in its history. 946:, which was criticised as it did not adequately consider the Committee's work and recommendations. 804: 749: 307:

He was known for his judicial innovation through landmark judgements, which made him "the face of

352: 323:. Alongside judicial activism and fundamental rights protection, he was strongly associated with 311:" in India. His decisions were credited with the forging of powerful new judicial tools such as 2463: 2443: 2398: 2272: 2223: 808: 661: 324: 293: 110: 48: 1868: 1590:"Dr. Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo vs Shri Prabhakar Kashinath Kunte & ... on 11 December, 1995" 869:

was being applied to the Sabarmati Express incident, but not to the riots. According to Verma:

2458: 2438: 2413: 2358: 2338: 2303: 2216: 792: 742: 429: 400: 71: 2200: 1043: 2562: 2557: 2503: 2408: 2318: 1124: 893: 862: 840: 827: 800: 598: 591: 570: 399:

from September 1986 until his elevation to the Supreme Court in June 1989. He acted as the

396: 268: 251: 129: 32: 8: 2423: 2383: 2378: 2333: 2293: 2233: 578: 577:

from India was inevitable. On 1 August 1991, the organization had also demanded that the

312: 83: 1197:"The Court has grown stronger in keeping with the need of the times: Justice J.S. Verma" 847:'s credibility. In a 2008 interview, Verma criticized Vajpayee's response to the letter: 2488: 2468: 2433: 2403: 2393: 2298: 2166: 2135: 513: 316: 272: 2428: 2363: 2348: 2323: 1856: 1569: 928: 320: 308: 1669: 1291:"Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi Etc. ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors on 20 September, 1990" 549:

The Supreme Court elucidated the meaning of Indian secularism in this case stating:

2528: 2453: 2308: 812: 741:

in Article 48A and the fundamental duty in Article 51A (g) of every citizen in the

219: 1338:"Smt. Nilabati Behera Aliaslalit ... vs State Of Orissa And Ors on 24 March, 1993" 1268: 700:

The Supreme Court of India in this case upheld the constitutional validity of the

2388: 2241: 2018: 1917: 1798: 602: 748:

The court was guided by the need to educate people in the doctrine of trust and

2368: 2328: 344: 328: 1886: 1742:"T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 February, 2012" 1022:"Justice Verma, the face of judicial activism, dies of multiple organ failure" 999: 907:

Justice Verma was one of the leading figures involved in the movement for the

420: 2551: 2483: 2478: 2473: 1717:"Naga People'S Movement, Of Human ... vs Union Of India on 27 November, 1997" 1146: 975:

Verma died from multiple organ failure on 22 April 2013 at Medanta Hospital,

380: 207: 1875: 1792:

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-judiciary-s-conscience-keeper/1106212/

2523: 2518: 2513: 2498: 1814: 1499: 1408: 1290: 729: 1741: 1386: 2508: 2493: 2448: 2288: 1838:"Restatement of Values of Judicial Life (1999) – CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS" 767: 521: 366:

Verma began his legal career in 1955, and enrolled as an advocate in the

289:(18 January 1933 – 22 April 2013) was an Indian jurist who served as the 2121: 1716: 327:, probity in public life, judicial accountability, as well as enhancing 1589: 1455: 1430: 1337: 1315: 1072: 932: 246: 1069:"Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997" 2353: 2069: 875: 480: 451: 1768:"Justice J.S. Verma: A no-nonsense judge driven by sense of justice" 1243: 665: 653: 615: 1615:"NYOOOZ - Simply News Local News, India News, City News, Politics" 296:

from 25 March 1997 to 18 January 1998. He was the chairman of the

979:

at the age of 80. He was survived by his wife and two daughters.

976: 820: 582: 574: 534: 348: 1409:"S.P. Gupta vs President Of India And Ors. on 30 December, 1981" 651: 2201:

Justice Verma Commission Report on the Delhi Gangrape incident

477:

Advocates-On-Record Association & Ors. v. Union of India 3

1640:"SC declines to reconsider 1995 order on meaning of Hindutva" 1316:"K. Veeraswami vs Union Of India And Others on 25 July, 1991" 996:"The Last Word - The Last Word: Remembering Justice JS Verma" 340: 223: 199: 1500:"Jamaat-E-Islami Hind vs Union Of India on 7 December, 1994" 1666:"Groundbreaking cases | Progress of the World's Women" 865:, a similar reward for riot victims was Rs 1 lakh. Second, 422:

Kumari Shrileka Vidyarthi etc. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

1614: 558: 773: 1387:"Supreme Court ... vs Union Of India on 6 October, 1993" 896:. Observing the 52nd anniversary of the adoption of the 856: 731:

T N Godavarman Thirumulkpad Vs. Union of India & Ors

2044:"Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law" 1456:"Ismail Faruqui vs Union Of India on 24 October, 1994" 1147:"Justice J S Verma sworn in as Chief Justice of India" 569:

At a public meeting held in Delhi on 27 May 1990, the

512:. Article 365 of the Indian Constitution empowers the 339:

Jagdish Sharan Verma was born in a Kayastha Family in

957:

West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences

465:

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

1263: 1261: 782: 687:India which depends on a safe working environment. 334: 2271: 1063: 1061: 770:case, and the prosecution of Godman Chandraswami. 453:Smt. Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Orissa & Ors 436: 882: 826:"The tragic events in Gujarat, starting with the 395:in June 1985 and also served as Chief Justice of 2549: 1258: 501: 2593:Chief justices of the Madhya Pradesh High Court 1711: 1709: 1478:"The Unlawful Activities (Prevention)Act, 1967" 1431:"Article 365 in The Constitution Of India 1949" 1058: 1883:"Former & Present Chairperson and Members" 795:. On 1 April 2002 Justice Verma recommended a 2257: 1968:"Vajpayee could have intervened, but did not" 1693:"Vishakha and Others v. State of Rajasthan -" 1381: 1379: 1310: 1308: 923:, Justice Verma was appointed chairperson of 1765: 1706: 1093: 787:Justice Verma served as the Chairman of the 358:He had two daughters with his wife, Pushpa. 2136:"India's anti-rape law judge JS Verma dies" 1194: 959:while delivering the convocation address, " 892:Justice Verma was a strong believer in the 620:R.Y. Prabhoo vs P.K. Kunte 11 December 1995 2588:Chief justices of the Rajasthan High Court 2264: 2250: 1962: 1960: 1448: 1376: 1305: 1174:"Justice J.S. Verma: A Life in Judgements" 914: 31: 2196:Brief biography at Supreme Court of India 1690: 720:The Supreme Court went on to state that: 669:fundamentalist Hindu religious bigotry". 492:S. P Gupta et al. v Union of India et al. 470: 1836:INDIA, Author NNLRJ (11 November 2009). 1171: 1123:. Supreme Court of India. Archived from 998:. YouTube. 23 April 2013. Archived from 680:Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan 278: 262: 2578:Judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court 2019:"Judiciary should be brought under RTI" 1957: 1939:"Vajpayee was warned of CM's riot role" 1906: 1904: 1121:"Judges Biography:Jagdish Sharan Verma" 887: 560:Jamaat-e-Islami Hind vs. Union of India 2550: 1574:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 1224:. Indiatoday.intoday.in. 15 March 1996 774:Restatement of values of judicial life 761: 664:, while revisiting the two-decade-old 539:Dr. M Ismail Furuqui vs Union of India 2245: 2091: 1994:"Information is an obligation: Verma" 1835: 898:Universal Declaration of Human Rights 857:NHRC Report and visit to rescue camps 834: 609: 415: 2092:Verma, Jagdish S. (1 January 2009). 1901: 1811:"Annexure C | Department of Justice" 967:match lawyers with clients in need. 672: 588:Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 528: 386:Maintenance of Internal Security Act 2128: 1813:. 27 September 2013. Archived from 755:The Forest Conservation Act of 1980 13: 1931: 1113: 1096:"Legacy of change through justice" 1071:. Indiankanoon.org. Archived from 944:Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 14: 2614: 2189: 766:Justice Verma also presided over 695: 315:, and the expanded protection of 104:4 November 1999 – 17 January 2003 2228:25 March 1997 – 18 January 1998 2065:"Justice J.S. Verma passes away" 874:camps, including Shah-e-Alam in 789:National Human Rights Commission 783:National Human Rights Commission 628:Representation of the People Act 573:had held that the separation of 406: 335:Early life, education and family 298:National Human Rights Commission 92:National Human Rights Commission 2170:. 22 April 2013. Archived from 2154: 2114: 2085: 2057: 2036: 2011: 1986: 1922: 1829: 1803: 1785: 1759: 1734: 1684: 1658: 1632: 1607: 1582: 1536: 1524:. Indian Express. 24 April 2013 1514: 1492: 1470: 1423: 1401: 1352: 1330: 1283: 1236: 1214: 1046:. Indian Express. 25 April 2013 1024:. Indian Express. 23 April 2013 702:Armed Forces Special Powers Act 537:Judgement is formally known as 438:K Veeraswami vs. Union of India 61:25 March 1997 – 18 January 1998 2583:University of Allahabad alumni 1766:Harish Salve (26 April 2013). 1188: 1165: 1139: 1094:Karuna Nundy (25 April 2013). 1087: 1036: 1014: 988: 909:Right to Information Act, 2005 883:Post-retirement public service 638:The Supreme Court stated that: 510:Karnataka Legislative Assembly 1: 1195:MANOJ MITTA (15 March 1996). 982: 815:, and Sardarpura in Mehsana. 739:Directive Principles in India 689:Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan 503:S.R. Bommai v. Union of India 479:) was the foundation for the 403:twice between 1986 and 1989. 361: 267:The President of India, Dr. 7: 2603:20th-century Indian lawyers 911:and in its implementation. 863:attack on Sabarmati Express 652:Supreme Court revisits the 391:He became Chief Justice of 376:state of emergency in India 204:Central Provinces and Berar 16:27th Chief Justice of India 10: 2619: 2598:20th-century Indian judges 2122:"Justice Verma Foundation" 1172:Livemint (23 April 2013). 543:demolition of Babri Masjid 490:In the First Judges Case ( 161:June 1985 - September 1986 142:September 1986 - June 1989 2534:Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud 2374:Raghunandan Swarup Pathak 2344:Jayantilal Chhotalal Shah 2314:Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha 2284: 2230: 2221: 2213: 2208: 1928:Case No. 1150/6/2001-2002 1691:LAWNN.COM (18 May 2013). 1522:"An optimist to the last" 949: 925:a three-member commission 845:Nanavati-Mehta Commission 393:Madhya Pradesh High Court 374:After the declaration of 368:Madhya Pradesh High Court 302:2012 Delhi gang rape case 257: 245: 237: 229: 213: 193: 188: 184: 173: 168:Madhya Pradesh High Court 165: 154: 149:Madhya Pradesh High Court 146: 135: 127: 123:June 1989 - 24 March 1997 116: 108: 97: 89: 77: 65: 54: 46: 42: 30: 23: 970: 919:In the aftermath of the 750:intergenerational equity 475:The Second Judges Case ( 351:. He graduated from the 2568:Chief justices of India 2273:Chief Justices of India 2162:"Justice JS Verma dies" 1244:"Former Chief Justices" 921:2012 gang rape in Delhi 915:Justice Verma Committee 355:with a B.Sc. and LL.B. 353:University of Allahabad 217:22 April 2013 (aged 80) 2464:Yogesh Kumar Sabharwal 2444:Gopal Ballav Pattanaik 2399:Madhukar Hiralal Kania 2224:Chief Justice of India 1885:. NHRC. Archived from 1246:. Rajasthan High Court 880: 854: 727: 714: 645: 556: 471:The Second Judges Case 294:Chief Justice of India 283: 276: 111:Supreme Court of India 49:Chief Justice of India 2459:Ramesh Chandra Lahoti 2439:Bhupinder Nath Kirpal 2414:Aziz Mushabber Ahmadi 2359:Mirza Hameedullah Beg 2339:Mohammad Hidayatullah 2304:Bijan Kumar Mukherjea 2217:Aziz Mushabber Ahmadi 2094:"CONVOCATION ADDRESS" 1797:24 April 2013 at the 1269:"Landmark Judgements" 871: 849: 793:2002 Gujarat Violence 743:Constitution of India 722: 709: 640: 581:hold a plebiscite in 551: 430:Constitution of India 401:Governor of Rajasthan 282: 266: 180:June 1972 - June 1985 37:Justice Verma in 2011 2504:Jagdish Singh Khehar 2409:M. N. Venkatachaliah 2319:P. B. Gajendragadkar 1998:www.burmalibrary.org 1916:29 June 2013 at the 1817:on 27 September 2013 1672:on 28 September 2013 894:Right to Information 888:Right to Information 841:Atal Bihari Vajpayee 828:Godhra train burning 599:Jamaat-e-Islami Hind 592:Jamaat-e-Islami Hind 571:Jamaat-e-Islami Hind 397:Rajasthan High Court 287:Jagdish Sharan Verma 269:Shankar Dayal Sharma 252:Allahabad University 130:Rajasthan High Court 25:Jagdish Sharan Verma 2424:Madan Mohan Punchhi 2384:Sabyasachi Mukharji 2379:E. S. Venkataramiah 2334:Kailas Nath Wanchoo 2294:M. Patanjali Sastri 2234:Madan Mohan Punchhi 1945:. 17 September 2011 762:Other notable cases 579:Government of India 325:women's empowerment 313:continuing mandamus 2489:Rajendra Mal Lodha 2469:K. G. Balakrishnan 2434:Sam Piroj Bharucha 2404:Lalit Mohan Sharma 2394:Kamal Narain Singh 2299:Mehr Chand Mahajan 2167:The Times of India 1974:. 10 November 2008 1867:has generic name ( 1842:LAW RESOURCE INDIA 1502:. Indiankanoon.org 1458:. Indiankanoon.org 1411:. Indiankanoon.org 1389:. Indiankanoon.org 1340:. Indiankanoon.org 1318:. Indiankanoon.org 1293:. Indiankanoon.org 1271:. Outlookindia.com 1002:on 18 October 2013 835:Letter to Vajpayee 610:Hindutva Judgement 514:President of India 416:Most notable cases 317:fundamental rights 284: 277: 273:Rashtrapati Bhavan 2573:People from Satna 2545: 2544: 2429:Adarsh Sein Anand 2364:Y. V. Chandrachud 2349:Sarv Mittra Sikri 2324:Amal Kumar Sarkar 2240: 2239: 2231:Succeeded by 1646:. 26 October 2016 929:Gopal Subramaniam 673:Vishaka Judgement 529:Ayodhya Judgement 321:Vishaka Judgement 309:judicial activism 261: 260: 2610: 2538: 2529:Uday Umesh Lalit 2454:S. Rajendra Babu 2309:Sudhi Ranjan Das 2266: 2259: 2252: 2243: 2242: 2214:Preceded by 2206: 2205: 2184: 2183: 2181: 2179: 2174:on 25 April 2013 2158: 2152: 2151: 2149: 2147: 2132: 2126: 2125: 2118: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2107: 2098: 2089: 2083: 2082: 2080: 2078: 2061: 2055: 2054: 2048: 2040: 2034: 2033: 2031: 2029: 2015: 2009: 2008: 2006: 2004: 1990: 1984: 1983: 1981: 1979: 1964: 1955: 1954: 1952: 1950: 1935: 1929: 1926: 1920: 1908: 1899: 1898: 1896: 1894: 1879: 1873: 1872: 1866: 1862: 1860: 1852: 1850: 1848: 1833: 1827: 1826: 1824: 1822: 1807: 1801: 1789: 1783: 1782: 1780: 1778: 1763: 1757: 1756: 1754: 1752: 1746:indiankanoon.org 1738: 1732: 1731: 1729: 1727: 1721:indiankanoon.org 1713: 1704: 1703: 1701: 1699: 1688: 1682: 1681: 1679: 1677: 1668:. Archived from 1662: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1651: 1636: 1630: 1629: 1627: 1625: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1602: 1600: 1594:indiankanoon.org 1586: 1580: 1579: 1573: 1565: 1563: 1561: 1555: 1549:. Archived from 1548: 1540: 1534: 1533: 1531: 1529: 1518: 1512: 1511: 1509: 1507: 1496: 1490: 1489: 1487: 1485: 1474: 1468: 1467: 1465: 1463: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1441: 1435:indiankanoon.org 1427: 1421: 1420: 1418: 1416: 1405: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1394: 1383: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1364: 1356: 1350: 1349: 1347: 1345: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1325: 1323: 1312: 1303: 1302: 1300: 1298: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1278: 1276: 1265: 1256: 1255: 1253: 1251: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1231: 1229: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1209: 1207: 1192: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1181: 1169: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1158: 1143: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1106: 1091: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1080: 1065: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1051: 1040: 1034: 1033: 1031: 1029: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1007: 992: 220:Gurgaon, Haryana 189:Personal details 178: 159: 140: 121: 102: 80: 68: 59: 35: 21: 20: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2541: 2536: 2389:Ranganath Misra 2280: 2270: 2236: 2227: 2219: 2192: 2187: 2177: 2175: 2160: 2159: 2155: 2145: 2143: 2142:. 23 April 2013 2134: 2133: 2129: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2105: 2103: 2101:NUJS Law Review 2096: 2090: 2086: 2076: 2074: 2073:. 22 April 2013 2063: 2062: 2058: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2027: 2025: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2002: 2000: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1977: 1975: 1966: 1965: 1958: 1948: 1946: 1943:Hindustan Times 1937: 1936: 1932: 1927: 1923: 1918:Wayback Machine 1909: 1902: 1892: 1890: 1889:on 6 March 2013 1881: 1880: 1876: 1864: 1863: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1844: 1834: 1830: 1820: 1818: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1799:Wayback Machine 1790: 1786: 1776: 1774: 1764: 1760: 1750: 1748: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1725: 1723: 1715: 1714: 1707: 1697: 1695: 1689: 1685: 1675: 1673: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1649: 1647: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1623: 1621: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1598: 1596: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1567: 1566: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1546: 1544:"Archived copy" 1542: 1541: 1537: 1527: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1505: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1483: 1481: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1461: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1439: 1437: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1414: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1392: 1390: 1385: 1384: 1377: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1343: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1321: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1296: 1294: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1274: 1272: 1267: 1266: 1259: 1249: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1227: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1205: 1203: 1193: 1189: 1179: 1177: 1170: 1166: 1156: 1154: 1153:. 26 March 1997 1145: 1144: 1140: 1130: 1128: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1104: 1102: 1092: 1088: 1078: 1076: 1067: 1066: 1059: 1049: 1047: 1044:"A brave judge" 1042: 1041: 1037: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1005: 1003: 994: 993: 989: 985: 973: 952: 917: 890: 885: 859: 837: 805:Gulbarg Society 785: 776: 768:the fodder scam 764: 734: 698: 675: 658: 612: 603:natural justice 563: 531: 506: 473: 456: 441: 425: 418: 409: 364: 337: 218: 198: 197:18 January 1933 179: 174: 160: 155: 147:Chief Justice, 141: 136: 128:Chief Justice, 122: 117: 103: 98: 78: 66: 60: 55: 38: 26: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2616: 2606: 2605: 2600: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2575: 2570: 2565: 2560: 2543: 2542: 2540: 2539: 2531: 2526: 2521: 2516: 2511: 2506: 2501: 2496: 2491: 2486: 2481: 2476: 2471: 2466: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2436: 2431: 2426: 2421: 2416: 2411: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2391: 2386: 2381: 2376: 2371: 2369:P. N. Bhagwati 2366: 2361: 2356: 2351: 2346: 2341: 2336: 2331: 2329:Koka Subba Rao 2326: 2321: 2316: 2311: 2306: 2301: 2296: 2291: 2285: 2282: 2281: 2269: 2268: 2261: 2254: 2246: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2229: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209:Legal offices 2204: 2203: 2198: 2191: 2190:External links 2188: 2186: 2185: 2153: 2127: 2113: 2084: 2056: 2035: 2023:www.rediff.com 2010: 1985: 1956: 1930: 1921: 1900: 1874: 1828: 1802: 1784: 1758: 1733: 1705: 1683: 1657: 1644:Indian Express 1631: 1606: 1581: 1535: 1513: 1491: 1469: 1447: 1422: 1400: 1375: 1351: 1329: 1304: 1282: 1257: 1235: 1213: 1187: 1164: 1138: 1127:on 28 May 2013 1112: 1086: 1075:on 5 June 2012 1057: 1035: 1013: 986: 984: 981: 972: 969: 951: 948: 916: 913: 889: 886: 884: 881: 858: 855: 836: 833: 784: 781: 775: 772: 763: 760: 733: 728: 697: 696:AFSPA Judgment 694: 674: 671: 657: 650: 611: 608: 562: 557: 530: 527: 505: 500: 472: 469: 455: 450: 440: 435: 424: 419: 417: 414: 408: 405: 363: 360: 345:Madhya Pradesh 336: 333: 329:social justice 259: 258: 255: 254: 249: 243: 242: 239: 235: 234: 231: 227: 226: 215: 211: 210: 195: 191: 190: 186: 185: 182: 181: 171: 170: 163: 162: 152: 151: 144: 143: 133: 132: 125: 124: 114: 113: 106: 105: 95: 94: 87: 86: 81: 75: 74: 69: 63: 62: 52: 51: 44: 43: 40: 39: 36: 28: 27: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2615: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2553: 2535: 2532: 2530: 2527: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2512: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2497: 2495: 2492: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2484:P. Sathasivam 2482: 2480: 2479:Altamas Kabir 2477: 2475: 2474:S. H. Kapadia 2472: 2470: 2467: 2465: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2437: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2375: 2372: 2370: 2367: 2365: 2362: 2360: 2357: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2347: 2345: 2342: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2332: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2312: 2310: 2307: 2305: 2302: 2300: 2297: 2295: 2292: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2283: 2278: 2274: 2267: 2262: 2260: 2255: 2253: 2248: 2247: 2244: 2235: 2226: 2225: 2218: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2173: 2169: 2168: 2163: 2157: 2141: 2137: 2131: 2123: 2117: 2102: 2095: 2088: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2060: 2052: 2045: 2039: 2024: 2020: 2014: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1973: 1969: 1963: 1961: 1944: 1940: 1934: 1925: 1919: 1915: 1912: 1907: 1905: 1888: 1884: 1878: 1870: 1858: 1843: 1839: 1832: 1816: 1812: 1806: 1800: 1796: 1793: 1788: 1773: 1769: 1762: 1747: 1743: 1737: 1722: 1718: 1712: 1710: 1694: 1687: 1671: 1667: 1661: 1645: 1641: 1635: 1620: 1616: 1610: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1577: 1571: 1556:on 1 May 2015 1552: 1545: 1539: 1523: 1517: 1501: 1495: 1479: 1473: 1457: 1451: 1436: 1432: 1426: 1410: 1404: 1388: 1382: 1380: 1361: 1355: 1339: 1333: 1317: 1311: 1309: 1292: 1286: 1270: 1264: 1262: 1245: 1239: 1223: 1217: 1202: 1198: 1191: 1175: 1168: 1152: 1148: 1142: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1101: 1097: 1090: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1062: 1045: 1039: 1023: 1017: 1001: 997: 991: 987: 980: 978: 968: 964: 962: 958: 947: 945: 940: 936: 934: 930: 926: 922: 912: 910: 905: 901: 899: 895: 879: 877: 870: 868: 864: 853: 848: 846: 842: 832: 829: 824: 822: 816: 814: 810: 809:Naroda Patiya 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 780: 771: 769: 759: 756: 751: 746: 744: 740: 732: 726: 721: 718: 713: 708: 705: 703: 693: 690: 684: 682: 681: 670: 667: 663: 662:Supreme Court 655: 649: 644: 639: 636: 632: 629: 623: 621: 617: 607: 604: 600: 595: 593: 589: 584: 580: 576: 572: 567: 561: 555: 550: 547: 544: 540: 536: 526: 524: 523: 517: 515: 511: 504: 499: 495: 493: 488: 485: 482: 478: 468: 466: 460: 454: 449: 445: 439: 434: 433:to be valid. 431: 423: 413: 407:Supreme Court 404: 402: 398: 394: 389: 387: 383: 382: 381:habeas corpus 377: 372: 369: 359: 356: 354: 350: 346: 342: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 305: 303: 299: 295: 292: 288: 281: 274: 270: 265: 256: 253: 250: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 225: 221: 216: 212: 209: 208:British India 205: 201: 196: 192: 187: 183: 177: 172: 169: 164: 158: 153: 150: 145: 139: 134: 131: 126: 120: 115: 112: 107: 101: 96: 93: 88: 85: 82: 76: 73: 70: 64: 58: 53: 50: 45: 41: 34: 29: 22: 19: 2524:N. V. Ramana 2519:Sharad Bobde 2514:Ranjan Gogoi 2499:T. S. Thakur 2418: 2222: 2176:. Retrieved 2172:the original 2165: 2156: 2144:. Retrieved 2139: 2130: 2116: 2104:. Retrieved 2100: 2087: 2075:. Retrieved 2068: 2059: 2051:prsindia.org 2050: 2038: 2026:. Retrieved 2022: 2013: 2001:. Retrieved 1997: 1988: 1976:. Retrieved 1971: 1947:. Retrieved 1942: 1933: 1924: 1891:. Retrieved 1887:the original 1877: 1865:|first= 1845:. Retrieved 1841: 1831: 1819:. Retrieved 1815:the original 1805: 1787: 1775:. Retrieved 1771: 1761: 1749:. Retrieved 1745: 1736: 1724:. Retrieved 1720: 1696:. Retrieved 1686: 1676:25 September 1674:. Retrieved 1670:the original 1660: 1648:. Retrieved 1643: 1634: 1622:. Retrieved 1618: 1609: 1597:. Retrieved 1593: 1584: 1560:25 September 1558:. Retrieved 1551:the original 1538: 1526:. Retrieved 1516: 1504:. Retrieved 1494: 1482:. Retrieved 1472: 1460:. Retrieved 1450: 1438:. Retrieved 1434: 1425: 1413:. Retrieved 1403: 1391:. Retrieved 1366:. Retrieved 1354: 1342:. Retrieved 1332: 1320:. Retrieved 1295:. Retrieved 1285: 1273:. Retrieved 1248:. Retrieved 1238: 1226:. Retrieved 1216: 1204:. Retrieved 1200: 1190: 1178:. Retrieved 1167: 1155:. Retrieved 1150: 1141: 1129:. Retrieved 1125:the original 1115: 1103:. Retrieved 1099: 1089: 1077:. Retrieved 1073:the original 1048:. Retrieved 1038: 1026:. Retrieved 1016: 1004:. Retrieved 1000:the original 990: 974: 965: 960: 953: 941: 937: 931:and Justice 918: 906: 902: 891: 872: 860: 850: 838: 825: 817: 786: 777: 765: 747: 735: 730: 723: 719: 715: 710: 706: 699: 688: 685: 678: 676: 659: 646: 641: 637: 633: 624: 619: 613: 596: 568: 564: 559: 552: 548: 541:. After the 538: 532: 520: 518: 507: 502: 496: 491: 489: 486: 476: 474: 461: 457: 452: 446: 442: 437: 426: 421: 410: 390: 379: 373: 365: 357: 338: 306: 286: 285: 275:in New Delhi 175: 156: 137: 118: 99: 84:M.M. Punchhi 79:Succeeded by 56: 18: 2563:2013 deaths 2558:1933 births 2537:(incumbent) 2509:Dipak Misra 2494:H. L. Dattu 2449:V. N. Khare 2419:J. S. Verma 2289:H. J. Kania 1772:India Today 1201:India Today 813:Best Bakery 590:to ban the 522:ultra vires 72:A.M. Ahmadi 67:Preceded by 2552:Categories 2028:5 December 2003:5 December 1978:16 October 1949:16 October 1847:5 December 1821:5 December 1777:5 December 1751:5 December 1726:5 December 1698:5 December 1650:27 October 1624:5 December 1599:5 December 1528:23 January 1506:23 January 1484:23 January 1480:. Satp.org 1462:23 January 1440:5 December 1415:23 January 1393:23 January 1368:5 December 1344:23 January 1322:23 January 1297:23 January 1275:23 January 1228:23 January 1206:5 December 1180:23 January 1176:. Livemint 1157:29 October 1151:Rediff.com 1105:23 January 1079:23 January 1050:23 January 1028:23 January 1006:23 January 983:References 933:Leila Seth 618:Judgment ( 362:High Court 319:as in the 247:Alma mater 90:Chairman, 2354:A. N. Ray 2106:2 January 2070:The Hindu 1100:The Hindu 876:Ahmedabad 758:thereof. 656:Judgement 481:collegium 176:In office 157:In office 138:In office 119:In office 100:In office 57:In office 2178:23 April 2146:23 April 2140:BBC News 2077:23 April 1914:Archived 1893:30 March 1857:cite web 1795:Archived 1570:cite web 1250:23 April 1131:23 April 666:Hindutva 654:Hindutva 616:Hindutva 238:Children 1972:Tehelka 977:Gurgaon 852:Office. 821:Gujarat 583:Kashmir 575:Kashmir 535:Ayodhya 349:Lucknow 166:Judge, 109:Judge, 1619:NYOOOZ 950:Legacy 801:Godhra 233:Pushpa 230:Spouse 2097:(PDF) 2047:(PDF) 1554:(PDF) 1547:(PDF) 1363:(PDF) 971:Death 341:Satna 224:India 200:Satna 47:27th 2277:list 2180:2013 2148:2013 2108:2015 2079:2013 2030:2019 2005:2019 1980:2016 1951:2016 1895:2013 1869:help 1849:2019 1823:2019 1779:2019 1753:2019 1728:2019 1700:2019 1678:2013 1652:2016 1626:2019 1601:2019 1576:link 1562:2013 1530:2014 1508:2014 1486:2014 1464:2014 1442:2019 1417:2014 1395:2014 1370:2019 1346:2014 1324:2014 1299:2014 1277:2014 1252:2013 1230:2014 1208:2019 1182:2014 1159:2018 1133:2013 1107:2014 1081:2014 1052:2014 1030:2014 1008:2014 867:POTA 677:The 660:The 614:The 533:The 291:27th 214:Died 194:Born 963:." 797:CBI 2554:: 2164:. 2138:. 2099:. 2067:. 2049:. 2021:. 1996:. 1970:. 1959:^ 1941:. 1903:^ 1861:: 1859:}} 1855:{{ 1840:. 1770:. 1744:. 1719:. 1708:^ 1642:. 1617:. 1592:. 1572:}} 1568:{{ 1433:. 1378:^ 1307:^ 1260:^ 1199:. 1149:. 1098:. 1060:^ 811:, 807:, 803:, 745:. 388:. 343:, 331:. 222:, 206:, 202:, 2279:) 2275:( 2265:e 2258:t 2251:v 2182:. 2150:. 2124:. 2110:. 2081:. 2053:. 2032:. 2007:. 1982:. 1953:. 1897:. 1871:) 1851:. 1825:. 1781:. 1755:. 1730:. 1702:. 1680:. 1654:. 1628:. 1603:. 1578:) 1564:. 1532:. 1510:. 1488:. 1466:. 1444:. 1419:. 1397:. 1372:. 1348:. 1326:. 1301:. 1279:. 1254:. 1232:. 1210:. 1184:. 1161:. 1135:. 1109:. 1083:. 1054:. 1032:. 1010:. 241:2

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index