46:
would not publish findings that had been published elsewhere, in other media or in other journals. The rule was subsequently adopted by several other scientific journals, and has shaped scientific publishing ever since. Historically it has also helped to ensure that the journal's content is fresh and
84:
many journals have loosened their requirements concerning the
Ingelfinger rule. In a defense of the policy, the journal said in an editorial that the practice discouraged scientists from talking to the media before their work was peer reviewed.
67:
which would unduly inflate their publication record. On the other hand, it has also been stated that the real reason for the
Ingelfinger rule is to protect the journals' revenue stream, and with the increase in popularity of
34:) editor-in-chief who enunciated it in 1969. Editorials in most journals were published anonymously that time, so the paper was published without an author's name.. This rule - basically meant for
605:
482:
554:
278:
Lariviere, V; Gingras, Y (2009). "On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007)".
1208:
209:
1193:
1036:
685:
94:
205:
1203:
486:
381:
450:
403:
26:
963:
1026:
678:
973:
47:
does not duplicate content previously reported elsewhere, and seeks to protect the scientific embargo system.
1223:
1244:
1218:
1188:
671:
1259:
1183:
736:
235:
1198:
1178:
546:
1213:
569:"Ingelfinger Over-Ruled: The Role of the Web in the Future of Refereed Medical Journal Publishing"
1115:
1059:
573:
56:
1155:
871:
827:
213:
1145:
1120:
897:
806:
718:
367:
64:
1249:
1135:
1100:
1054:
942:
902:
887:
63:
The
Ingelfinger rule has been seen as having the aim of preventing authors from performing
21:
8:
694:
547:"The Ingelfinger Rule: Franz Ingelfinger at the New England Journal of Medicine 1967–77"
335:
300:
1105:
741:
713:
647:
618:
533:
348:
279:
124:
81:
35:
587:
568:
520:
501:
1161:
1049:
1016:
837:
758:
652:
592:
525:
469:
422:
377:
352:
340:
322:
187:
168:
144:
606:"Why the Ecology Letters editorial board should reconsider its No vote on preprints"
537:
1064:
786:
708:
642:
632:
617:
Desjardins-Proulx, P; White, EP; Adamson, JJ; Ram, K; Poisot, T; Gravel, D (2013).
582:
515:
459:
412:
330:
312:
177:
136:
1125:
922:
912:
859:
842:
768:
637:
182:
163:
69:
51:
464:
445:
417:
398:
140:
1254:
1074:
1044:
980:
947:
917:
866:
753:
748:
104:
317:
1238:
1130:
937:
907:
791:
776:
369:
Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the
Internet
326:
656:
623:
596:
344:
99:
529:
473:
426:
191:
148:
1110:
968:
927:
781:
483:"Casting a critical eye on the embargo system: one year of Embargo Watch"
990:
892:
506:
663:
1011:
854:
373:
1084:
1079:
1006:
796:
284:
1021:
985:
932:
502:"The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review–Part 1"
77:
616:
1069:
832:
822:
305:
Medical
Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation in Ophthalmology
50:
An earlier version of the policy had been expressed in 1960 by
1140:
801:
73:
849:
259:
Lewenstein, BV (1988). "It's Not Really the Relman Rule".
164:"Franz Ingelfinger's Legacy Shaped Biology Publishing"
301:"COVID-19 impact on research and publication ethics"
299:Heidary, Fatemeh; Gharebaghi, Reza (2021-05-31).
298:
236:"Selective Leaking — Breaking Ingelfinger's Rule"
1236:
277:
396:
679:
95:List of academic journals by preprint policy
686:
672:
258:
233:
117:
646:
636:
586:
519:
463:
416:
334:
316:
283:
181:
619:"The Case for Open Preprints in Biology"
390:
161:
693:
365:
1237:
566:
499:
487:Association of British Science Writers
443:
1194:Academic databases and search engines
667:
603:
480:
60:, but did not become as well known.
544:
451:The New England Journal of Medicine
404:The New England Journal of Medicine
125:"Definition of "sole contribution""
27:The New England Journal of Medicine
13:
964:Academic journal publishing reform
437:
14:
1271:
20:is an eponymous rule named after
399:"The Ingelfinger Rule Revisited"
38:, was originally meant only for
397:Angell, M; Kassirer, J (1991).
234:Schachtman, NA (20 June 2014).
135:(12): 676–677. September 1969.
359:
292:
271:
252:
227:
212:. 13 June 2000. Archived from
198:
155:
1:
1224:Category:Scientific documents
588:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)92002-6
521:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91016-8
481:Spain, A (26 February 2011).
206:"Ingelfinger rule definition"
110:
1219:Category:Academic publishing
638:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563
183:10.1126/science.282.5390.861
7:
465:10.1056/NEJM198110013051408
418:10.1056/NEJM199111073251910
141:10.1056/NEJM196909182811208
88:
10:
1276:
1037:Indexes and search engines
1171:
1093:
1035:
999:
956:
880:
815:
767:
729:
701:
318:10.51329/mehdiophthal1414
1214:Style/formatting guides
1116:Scholarly communication
816:Other publication types
574:The Lancet Perspectives
57:Physical Review Letters
1156:Least publishable unit
828:Collection of articles
446:"The Ingelfinger Rule"
176:(5390): 861–3, 865–7.
65:duplicate publications
1146:Electronic publishing
1121:Scientific literature
898:Article-level metrics
42:. The rule was, that
36:scientific publishing
1189:Open-access journals
1136:Open scientific data
943:SCImago Journal Rank
903:Author-level metrics
888:Acknowledgment index
366:Borgman, CL (2007).
162:Marshall, E (1998).
22:Franz J. Ingelfinger
1245:Academic publishing
1184:Scientific journals
695:Academic publishing
610:Jabberwocky Ecology
500:Altman, LK (1996).
444:Relman, AS (1981).
240:Schachtman Law Blog
1260:1969 introductions
1204:Copyright policies
1199:University presses
1106:Scientific writing
974:Citation advantage
881:Impact and ranking
714:Scientific journal
567:Harnad, S (2000).
1232:
1231:
1209:Preprint policies
1179:Academic journals
1162:Publish or perish
1017:Version of record
957:Reform and access
759:Literature review
604:White, E (2014).
411:(19): 1371–1373.
383:978-0-262-02619-2
1267:
1151:Ingelfinger rule
1065:Semantic Scholar
787:Technical report
709:Academic journal
688:
681:
674:
665:
664:
660:
650:
640:
613:
600:
590:
563:
551:
541:
523:
514:(9012): 1382–6.
496:
494:
493:
477:
467:
431:
430:
420:
394:
388:
387:
363:
357:
356:
338:
320:
296:
290:
289:
287:
275:
269:
268:
256:
250:
249:
247:
246:
231:
225:
224:
222:
221:
202:
196:
195:
185:
159:
153:
152:
121:
70:preprint servers
54:, editor of the
18:Ingelfinger rule
1275:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1228:
1167:
1126:Learned society
1089:
1031:
995:
952:
923:Journal ranking
913:Citation impact
876:
811:
769:Grey literature
763:
725:
697:
692:
631:(5): e1001563.
549:
545:Toy, J (2002).
491:
489:
440:
438:Further reading
435:
434:
395:
391:
384:
364:
360:
297:
293:
276:
272:
257:
253:
244:
242:
232:
228:
219:
217:
204:
203:
199:
160:
156:
123:
122:
118:
113:
91:
52:Samuel Goudsmit
12:
11:
5:
1273:
1263:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1230:
1229:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1175:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1165:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1097:
1095:
1094:Related topics
1091:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1075:Web of Science
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1045:Google Scholar
1041:
1039:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1014:
1009:
1003:
1001:
997:
996:
994:
993:
988:
983:
981:Serials crisis
978:
977:
976:
966:
960:
958:
954:
953:
951:
950:
948:Scientometrics
945:
940:
935:
930:
925:
920:
918:Citation index
915:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
884:
882:
878:
877:
875:
874:
869:
867:Poster session
864:
863:
862:
857:
847:
846:
845:
840:
830:
825:
819:
817:
813:
812:
810:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
773:
771:
765:
764:
762:
761:
756:
754:Position paper
751:
749:Review article
746:
745:
744:
733:
731:
727:
726:
724:
723:
722:
721:
711:
705:
703:
699:
698:
691:
690:
683:
676:
668:
662:
661:
614:
601:
564:
555:Science Editor
542:
497:
478:
439:
436:
433:
432:
389:
382:
376:. p. 99.
358:
291:
270:
261:ScienceWriters
251:
226:
197:
154:
115:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
105:Network effect
102:
97:
90:
87:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1272:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1163:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1131:Open research
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1092:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1004:
1002:
998:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
975:
972:
971:
970:
967:
965:
962:
961:
959:
955:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
938:Impact factor
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
924:
921:
919:
916:
914:
911:
909:
908:Bibliometrics
906:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
889:
886:
885:
883:
879:
873:
870:
868:
865:
861:
858:
856:
853:
852:
851:
848:
844:
841:
839:
836:
835:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
820:
818:
814:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
792:Annual report
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
777:Working paper
775:
774:
772:
770:
766:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
747:
743:
740:
739:
738:
735:
734:
732:
728:
720:
719:Public health
717:
716:
715:
712:
710:
707:
706:
704:
700:
696:
689:
684:
682:
677:
675:
670:
669:
666:
658:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
630:
626:
625:
620:
615:
611:
607:
602:
598:
594:
589:
584:
580:
576:
575:
570:
565:
562:(6): 195–198.
561:
557:
556:
548:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
522:
517:
513:
509:
508:
503:
498:
488:
484:
479:
475:
471:
466:
461:
458:(14): 824–6.
457:
453:
452:
447:
442:
441:
428:
424:
419:
414:
410:
406:
405:
400:
393:
385:
379:
375:
371:
370:
362:
354:
350:
346:
342:
337:
332:
328:
324:
319:
314:
310:
306:
302:
295:
286:
281:
274:
266:
262:
255:
241:
237:
230:
216:on 2014-07-11
215:
211:
207:
201:
193:
189:
184:
179:
175:
171:
170:
165:
158:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
120:
116:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
92:
86:
83:
79:
75:
71:
66:
61:
59:
58:
53:
48:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
28:
23:
19:
1150:
628:
624:PLOS Biology
622:
609:
578:
572:
559:
553:
511:
505:
490:. Retrieved
455:
449:
408:
402:
392:
368:
361:
308:
304:
294:
273:
264:
260:
254:
243:. Retrieved
239:
229:
218:. Retrieved
214:the original
210:Medicine.net
200:
173:
167:
157:
132:
129:N Engl J Med
128:
119:
100:News embargo
62:
55:
49:
43:
39:
31:
25:
17:
15:
1250:Peer review
1111:Peer review
991:#ICanHazPDF
969:Open access
928:Eigenfactor
872:Proceedings
782:White paper
267:(2): 17–18.
1239:Categories
1027:Retraction
1000:Versioning
893:Altmetrics
838:Biological
507:The Lancet
492:2017-03-24
311:(1): 1–4.
245:2015-05-23
220:2011-08-20
111:References
1012:Postprint
855:Monograph
807:Lab notes
374:MIT Press
353:236407601
327:2322-3219
285:0906.4019
1085:OpenAlex
1080:Paperity
1007:Preprint
843:Chemical
797:Pamphlet
742:Abstract
702:Journals
657:23690752
597:11191471
538:44524038
345:37641621
336:10460218
89:See also
72:such as
1101:Imprint
1022:Erratum
986:Sci-Hub
933:h-index
860:Chapter
648:3653830
581:: s16.
530:8637347
474:7266634
427:1669838
192:9841429
169:Science
149:5807917
78:bioRxiv
1070:Scopus
1050:AMiner
833:Patent
823:Thesis
730:Papers
655:
645:
595:
536:
528:
472:
425:
380:
351:
343:
333:
325:
190:
147:
80:, and
24:, the
1255:Rules
1172:Lists
1141:ORCID
802:Essay
737:Paper
550:(PDF)
534:S2CID
349:S2CID
280:arXiv
74:arXiv
1060:CORE
1055:BASE
850:Book
653:PMID
593:PMID
526:PMID
470:PMID
423:PMID
378:ISBN
341:PMID
323:ISSN
188:PMID
145:PMID
44:NEJM
40:NEJM
32:NEJM
16:The
643:PMC
633:doi
583:doi
579:356
516:doi
512:347
460:doi
456:305
413:doi
409:325
331:PMC
313:doi
178:doi
174:282
137:doi
133:281
82:HAL
1241::
651:.
641:.
629:11
627:.
621:.
608:.
591:.
577:.
571:.
560:25
558:.
552:.
532:.
524:.
510:.
504:.
485:.
468:.
454:.
448:.
421:.
407:.
401:.
372:.
347:.
339:.
329:.
321:.
309:10
307:.
303:.
265:36
263:.
238:.
208:.
186:.
172:.
166:.
143:.
131:.
127:.
76:,
1164:"
1160:"
687:e
680:t
673:v
659:.
635::
612:.
599:.
585::
540:.
518::
495:.
476:.
462::
429:.
415::
386:.
355:.
315::
288:.
282::
248:.
223:.
194:.
180::
151:.
139::
30:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.