101:
326:
312:
30:
348:
Almost all articles on
Knowledge are given a quality rating. However, beyond good and featured articles, these ratings are not subject to community review, highly subjective, and not kept well up-to-date, so they should be taken with a grain of salt. To find an article's rating, go to its talk page
339:
Some good and featured articles were given their designation long ago and no longer meet present standards. To see the date when the article was promoted, go to its talk page and look for a banner with the article history. If the last formal assessment was more than a few years ago, it is likely
368:
of validity. Even a featured article that has recently appeared on the main page may contain vandalism. If you need to rely on a piece of information, the only way to do so with confidence is to check the cited source and confirm that it both matches what is in the article and
333:
292:
Although
Knowledge strives to ultimately improve all articles to meet professional standards, many do not yet do so. This page will teach you what you need to know as a reader to determine the quality level of an article.
251:
393:
This can include featured article/list candidate, featured article/list review, good article nomination, good article review, peer review, or main page appearance as today's featured article/list.
340:
still a fairly high quality article, but may not be comparable to more recently promoted articles. As of 2021, work to reevaluate old good and featured articles is ongoing.
356:, and slightly longer articles as start-class. As an article improves, it can rise to C-class, then B-class, then good article status, and finally featured article status.
309:
for professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. On non-mobile versions of the website, featured articles will have a small bronze star icon (
100:
53:; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Knowledge's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of
38:
325:
138:
246:
419:
279:
311:
409:
225:
306:
50:
320:
319:, which have been thoroughly reviewed by an independent editor and affirmed to meet a slightly less restrictive
46:
58:
365:
17:
302:
183:
370:
230:
16:
This page is designed for non-editing readers. For information on quality assessment for editors, see
272:
116:
316:
133:
296:
92:
414:
265:
193:
323:. On non-mobile versions of the website, good articles will have a small green plus icon (
8:
158:
121:
54:
315:) on the top right corner of the page. Additionally, 0.6% of articles are designated as
305:. These pages have passed a rigorous community review that has affirmed them to meet a
178:
163:
68:
374:
213:
173:
343:
76:
188:
148:
143:
111:
353:
208:
198:
153:
403:
241:
203:
359:
168:
380:
373:. Also, if you find an article that is lacking, you
401:
352:Very short articles are usually designated as
273:
331:
280:
266:
364:As Knowledge is a work in progress, it
329:) on the top right corner of the page.
402:
349:and look for the WikiProject banners.
24:
301:0.1% of articles are designated as
13:
51:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
431:
324:
310:
99:
28:
387:
1:
420:Knowledge article assessment
18:Knowledge:Content assessment
7:
410:Knowledge information pages
253:Reader's guide to Knowledge
10:
436:
375:can always help improve it
297:Good and featured articles
226:Researching with Knowledge
66:
22:Knowledge information page
15:
129:Assessing article quality
336:
344:Other quality ratings
335:
164:Images and multimedia
47:encyclopedic article
366:makes no guarantee
337:
303:featured articles
290:
289:
242:Readers' glossary
134:Authority control
87:
86:
427:
394:
391:
360:Closing thoughts
334:
328:
314:
282:
275:
268:
231:Citing Knowledge
103:
89:
88:
79:
39:information page
32:
31:
25:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
400:
399:
398:
397:
392:
388:
383:
362:
346:
332:
321:set of criteria
307:set of criteria
299:
286:
218:
194:Other languages
112:About Knowledge
83:
82:
75:
71:
63:
62:
29:
23:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
423:
422:
417:
412:
396:
395:
385:
384:
382:
379:
361:
358:
345:
342:
298:
295:
288:
287:
285:
284:
277:
270:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
249:
247:Readers' index
244:
236:
235:
234:
233:
228:
220:
219:
217:
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
186:
184:Offline access
181:
176:
171:
166:
161:
159:Disambiguation
156:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
125:
124:
119:
117:Administration
108:
105:
104:
96:
95:
85:
84:
81:
80:
72:
67:
64:
44:
43:
35:
33:
21:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
407:
405:
390:
386:
378:
376:
372:
367:
357:
355:
350:
341:
330:
327:
322:
318:
317:good articles
313:
308:
304:
294:
283:
278:
276:
271:
269:
264:
263:
261:
260:
255:
254:
250:
248:
245:
243:
240:
239:
238:
237:
232:
229:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
179:Mobile access
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
110:
109:
107:
106:
102:
98:
97:
94:
91:
90:
78:
74:
73:
70:
65:
60:
56:
52:
49:, nor one of
48:
45:It is not an
42:
40:
34:
27:
26:
19:
389:
363:
351:
347:
338:
300:
291:
252:
214:Student help
174:Microformats
128:
93:Readers' FAQ
36:
415:Reader help
371:is reliable
37:This is an
404:Categories
199:Page names
189:Navigation
149:Censorship
144:Categories
209:Searching
154:Copyright
77:H:QUALITY
55:consensus
69:Shortcut
204:Portals
59:vetting
381:Notes
354:stubs
139:Books
169:ISBN
122:FAQs
57:and
406::
377:.
281:e
274:t
267:v
61:.
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
