Knowledge

Halperin v. Kissinger

Source 📝

31: 288: 323:
In December 1991, Kissinger issued an apology to Halperin for his role in the wiretap, writing in a letter "It is something if circumstances were repeated I would not do again" and that he accepted moral responsibility for having "acquiesced in the tap." In response, Halperin voluntarily dropped the
226:
in June 1973, when he learned of the taps. Halperin and his family named ten federal officials as defendants and sought money damages. They alleges "that the wiretap, which was installed during an investigation into public disclosures of confidential information, was prohibited by both the
258:
Both the plaintiffs and the defendants appealed. Plaintiffs argued that "the District Court erred in not applying Title III, in awarding only nominal damages, and in granting summary judgment in favor of ... Kissinger." Nixon, Mitchell, and Haldeman argued that they had
503: 498: 271:
upheld the district court's ruling on immunity, but reversed the district court's ruling on "Title III, the proper measures of damages, and defendant Kissinger's motion for summary judgment" and
41: 251:. The court ruled that Nixon, Mitchell, and Haldeman "had violated the Halperins' Fourth Amendment rights, but not the terms of Title III" and in August 1977 awarded $ 1 in 120: 268: 232: 228: 209:
The tap was installed during an investigation into disclosures made to a reporter. The wiretap was illegal as it was performed without a court order.
508: 223: 196: 379: 488: 447: 459: 239:, and in December 1976 the trial court dismissed all defendants from the case except for three: former President 153: 104: 359: 100: 425: 299: 81: 30: 493: 272: 52:
Morton Halperin, et al. v. Henry Kissinger,Richard M. Nixon, John N. Mitchell, and H. R. Haldeman
124: 380:"Halperin v. Kissinger: The D.C. Circuit Rejects Presidential Immunity from Damage Actions" 235:" (which regulates wiretaps). Both Halperin and the government officials filed motions for 8: 149: 451: 264: 127: 455: 260: 443: 244: 240: 236: 206:
office. The wiretaps continued for 21 months, from May 1969 until February 1971.
325: 252: 199: 192: 364: 248: 157: 482: 332:
reported that this ended "one of the longest-running feuds in Washington."
504:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit cases
203: 287: 132: 429: 441: 97: 42:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
499:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia cases
318: 78: 448:"The Burger Court and the Rise of the Judicial Right" 324:
lawsuit, which had been pending for 19 years; Judge
103:(D.D.C.1976); nominal damages awarded, 434 F. Supp. 353: 351: 349: 347: 345: 115:Affirmed in part by equally divided Supreme Court, 269:U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 233:Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 480: 342: 224:U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia 275:to the district court for further proceedings. 202:, who approved wiretapping Halperin's home and 357: 278: 217: 435: 319:Kissenger apology and dropping of the suit 29: 328:formally dismissed the suit in 1992. The 509:United States Fourth Amendment case law 415: 413: 411: 409: 407: 405: 403: 401: 481: 372: 398: 358:Martin Tolchin (November 13, 1992). 282: 212: 13: 360:"Kissinger issues wiretap apology" 222:Halperin filed the lawsuit in the 14: 520: 286: 154:Spottswood William Robinson III 489:1979 in United States case law 96:Summary judgment granted, 424 1: 335: 7: 247:, and former Nixon advisor 10: 525: 243:, former Attorney General 191:was a court case filed by 172:Wright, joined by Robinson 197:National Security Advisor 176: 168: 163: 145: 140: 111: 92: 87: 73: 65: 57: 47: 37: 28: 23: 279:Proceedings in the 1980s 255:to the Halperin family. 218:Proceedings in the 1970s 16:1979 American court case 426:606 F.2d 1192 421:Halperin v. Kissinger 231:and Title III of the 188:Halperin v. Kissinger 117:Kissinger v. Halperin 24:Halperin v. Kissinger 442:Michael J. Graetz, 150:James Skelly Wright 452:Simon and Schuster 298:. You can help by 265:qualified immunity 112:Subsequent history 384:Loyola Law Review 316: 315: 261:absolute immunity 213:Court proceedings 184: 183: 516: 473: 472: 470: 468: 444:Linda Greenhouse 439: 433: 423: 417: 396: 395: 393: 391: 376: 370: 369: 355: 311: 308: 290: 283: 245:John N. Mitchell 241:Richard M. Nixon 237:summary judgment 229:Fourth Amendment 141:Court membership 61:February 9, 1979 33: 21: 20: 524: 523: 519: 518: 517: 515: 514: 513: 494:Henry Kissinger 479: 478: 477: 476: 466: 464: 462: 440: 436: 419: 418: 399: 389: 387: 378: 377: 373: 356: 343: 338: 326:John Helm Pratt 321: 312: 306: 303: 296:needs expansion 281: 267:. In 1979, the 253:nominal damages 220: 215: 200:Henry Kissinger 193:Morton Halperin 17: 12: 11: 5: 522: 512: 511: 506: 501: 496: 491: 475: 474: 460: 434: 397: 371: 365:New York Times 340: 339: 337: 334: 330:New York Times 320: 317: 314: 313: 293: 291: 280: 277: 249:H. R. Haldeman 219: 216: 214: 211: 182: 181: 178: 177:Concur/dissent 174: 173: 170: 166: 165: 161: 160: 158:Gerhard Gesell 147: 146:Judges sitting 143: 142: 138: 137: 113: 109: 108: 107:(D.D.C. 1977). 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 75: 71: 70: 67: 63: 62: 59: 55: 54: 49: 48:Full case name 45: 44: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 521: 510: 507: 505: 502: 500: 497: 495: 492: 490: 487: 486: 484: 463: 461:9781476732527 457: 453: 449: 445: 438: 431: 427: 422: 416: 414: 412: 410: 408: 406: 404: 402: 386:. p. 144 385: 381: 375: 367: 366: 361: 354: 352: 350: 348: 346: 341: 333: 331: 327: 310: 301: 297: 294:This section 292: 289: 285: 284: 276: 274: 270: 266: 262: 256: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 225: 210: 207: 205: 201: 198: 194: 190: 189: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164:Case opinions 162: 159: 155: 151: 148: 144: 139: 135: 134: 130: (1981) ( 129: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 99: 95: 93:Prior history 91: 86: 83: 80: 76: 72: 69:July 12, 1979 68: 64: 60: 56: 53: 50: 46: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 467:December 30, 465:. Retrieved 437: 420: 390:December 30, 388:. Retrieved 383: 374: 363: 329: 322: 304: 300:adding to it 295: 257: 221: 208: 187: 186: 185: 131: 116: 88:Case history 51: 18: 432: 1979). 204:White House 483:Categories 336:References 307:March 2018 133:per curiam 430:D.C. Cir. 446:(2016). 273:remanded 195:against 169:Majority 98:F. Supp. 74:Citation 66:Decided 458:  428: ( 424:, 180:Gesell 58:Argued 123: 38:Court 469:2016 456:ISBN 392:2016 125:U.S. 105:1193 82:1192 79:F.2d 77:606 302:. 263:or 128:713 121:452 101:838 485:: 454:. 450:. 400:^ 382:. 362:. 344:^ 156:, 152:, 136:). 119:, 471:. 394:. 368:. 309:) 305:(

Index


United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
F.2d
1192
F. Supp.
838
1193
452
U.S.
713
per curiam
James Skelly Wright
Spottswood William Robinson III
Gerhard Gesell
Morton Halperin
National Security Advisor
Henry Kissinger
White House
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Fourth Amendment
Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
summary judgment
Richard M. Nixon
John N. Mitchell
H. R. Haldeman
nominal damages
absolute immunity
qualified immunity
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
remanded

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.