297:
happen, teachers usually put forth effort to ensure that the test itself is hard enough when they intend to use a grading curve, such that they would expect the average student to get a lower raw score than the score intended to be used at the average in the curve, thus ensuring that all students benefit from the curve. Thus, curved grades cannot be blindly used and must be carefully considered and pondered compared to alternatives such as criterion-referenced grading. Furthermore, constant misuse of curved grading can adjust grades on poorly designed tests, whereas assessments should be designed to accurately reflect the learning objectives set by the instructor.
254:(GPA) thresholds. As many professors establish the curve to target a course average of a C, the corresponding grade point average equivalent would be a 2.0 on a standard 4.0 scale employed at most North American universities. Similarly, a grade point average of 3.0 on a 4.0 scale would indicate that the student is within the top 20 % of the class. Grading curves serve to attach additional significance to these figures, and the specific distribution employed may vary between academic institutions.
274:
develops oneself. For example, if one wants to give feedback to members of a class of students, one should relate the score of each individual to the means and standard deviations derived from the class itself. To maximize informativeness, one can provide the students with the frequency distribution for each scale, based on these local norms, and the individuals can then find (and circle) their own scores on these relevant distributions."
160:(WISC) compare individual student performance to the performance of a normative sample. Test takers cannot "fail" a norm-referenced test, as each test taker receives a score that compares the individual to others that have taken the test, usually given by a percentile. This is useful when there is a wide range of acceptable scores, and the goal is to find out who performs better.
296:
However, curved grading can increase competitiveness between students and affect their sense of faculty fairness in a class. Students are generally most upset in the case that the curve lowered their grade compared to what they would have received if a curve was not used. To ensure that this does not
280:
Another disadvantage of norm-referenced tests is that they cannot measure progress of the population as a whole, only where individuals fall within the whole. Rather, one must measure against a fixed goal, for instance, to measure the success of an educational reform program that seeks to raise the
203:
when the performance is judged according to the expected or desired behavior. Tests that judge the test taker based on a set standard (e.g., everyone should be able to run one kilometre in less than five minutes) are criterion-referenced tests. The goal of a criterion-referenced test is to find out
246:
For example, if there are five grades in a particular university course, A, B, C, D, and F, where A is reserved for the top 20 % of students, B for the next 30 %, C for the next 30–40 %, and D or F for the remaining 10–20 %, then scores in the percentile interval from 0 % to 10–20 % will receive a
288:
Norms do not automatically imply a standard. A norm-referenced test does not seek to enforce any expectation of what test takers should know or be able to do. It measures the test takers' current level by comparing the test takers to their peers. A rank-based system produces only data that tell
284:
With a norm-referenced test, grade level was traditionally set at the level set by the middle 50 percent of scores. By contrast, the
National Children's Reading Foundation believes that it is essential to assure that virtually all children read at or above grade level by third grade, a goal which
292:
The ultimate objective of grading curves is to minimize or eliminate the influence of variation between different instructors of the same course, ensuring that the students in any given class are assessed relative to their peers. This also circumvents problems associated with utilizing multiple
126:. In a criterion-referenced assessment, the score shows whether or not test takers performed well or poorly on a given task, not how that compares to other test takers; in an ipsative system, test takers are compared to previous performance. Each method can be used to grade the same test paper.
273:
website, "One should be very wary of using canned 'norms' because it isn't obvious that one could ever find a population of which one's present sample is a representative subset. Most 'norms' are misleading, and therefore they should not be used. Far more defensible are local norms, which one
190:
assessment, the individuals' performance is compared only to their previous performances. For example, a person on a weight-loss diet is judged by how his current weight compares to his own previous weight, rather than how his weight compares to an ideal or how it compares to another person.
293:
versions of a particular examination, a method often employed where test administration dates vary between class sections. Regardless of any difference in the level of difficulty, real or perceived, the grading curve ensures a balanced distribution of academic results.
289:
which students perform at an average level, which students do better, and which students do worse. It does not identify which test takers are able to correctly perform the tasks at a level that would be acceptable for employment or further education.
110:
drawn from the population. That is, this type of test identifies whether the test taker performed better or worse than other test takers, not whether the test taker knows either more or less material than is necessary for a given purpose. The term
242:
The percentile values are transformed to grades according to a division of the percentile scale into intervals, where the interval width of each grade indicates the desired relative frequency for that grade.
50:
which yields an estimate of the position of the tested individual in a predefined population, with respect to the trait being measured. Assigning scores on such tests may be described as
166:
are norm-referenced tests, because their goal is to rank test takers' intelligence. The median IQ is set to 100, and all test takers are ranked up or down in comparison to that level.
228:) are assigned to the students. The absolute values are less relevant, provided that the order of the scores corresponds to the relative performance of each student within the course.
102:, the graphical representation of the probability density of the normal distribution, but this method can be used to achieve any desired distribution of the grades – for example, a
247:
grade of D or F, scores from 11–21 % to 50 % will receive a grade of C, scores from 51 % to 80 % receive a grade of B, and scores from 81 % to 100 % will achieve a grade of A.
262:
The primary advantage of norm-reference tests is that they can provide information on how an individual's performance on the test compares to others in the reference group.
550:
NCTM: News & Media: Assessment Issues (Newsbulletin April 2004) "by definition, half of the nation's students are below grade level at any particular moment"
204:
whether the individual can run as fast as the test giver wants, not to find out whether the individual is faster or slower than the other runners.
250:
Consistent with the example illustrated above, a grading curve allows academic institutions to ensure the distribution of students across certain
439:
265:
A serious limitation of norm-reference tests is that the reference group may not represent the current population of interest. As noted by the
509:
208:
focuses on criterion-referenced testing. Most everyday tests and quizzes taken in school, as well as most state achievement tests and
157:
648:
561:
344:—all individuals are given the same test under the same conditions; used for both norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests
472:
Fairtest.org: Times on
Testing "criterion referenced" tests measure students against a fixed yardstick, not against each other.
270:
86:). It is a method of assigning grades to the students in a class in such a way as to obtain or approach a pre-specified
277:
Norm-referencing does not ensure that a test is valid (i.e. that it measures the construct it is intended to measure).
209:
17:
212:, are criterion-referenced. In this model, it is possible for all test takers to pass or for all test takers to fail.
205:
643:
119:
633:
482:
326:
103:
608:
638:
153:
613:
87:
525:
Like democracy, grading on a curve may be the worst possible system — except for all the alternatives.
266:
200:
39:
446:
106:. The estimate is derived from the analysis of test scores and possibly other relevant data from a
366:
579:
311:
43:
148:
Many college entrance exams and nationally used school tests use norm-referenced tests. The
321:
8:
251:
123:
107:
99:
91:
401:
Glaser, R. (1963). "Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes".
427:
559:
341:
306:
548:
410:
331:
71:
67:
565:
59:
627:
336:
225:
129:
90:
of these grades having a specific mean and derivation properties, such as a
618:
469:
232:
115:
is used when the reference population are the peers of the test taker.
47:
414:
285:
cannot be achieved with a norm-referenced definition of grade level.
537:
486:
316:
236:
187:
175:
95:
224:
Numeric scores (or possibly scores on a sufficiently fine-grained
483:"Illinois State Board of Education - Illinois Learning Standards"
163:
614:
A Brief Note about Grade
Statistics or How the Curve is Computed
27:
Yields an estimate of the testee's position in population
149:
220:One method of grading on a curve uses three steps:
174:As alternatives to normative testing, tests can be
118:Norm-referenced assessment can be contrasted with
178:assessments or criterion-referenced assessments.
625:
568:National Children's Reading Foundation website
98:distribution). The term "curve" refers to the
257:
536:Oregon Research Institute, IPIP website,
158:Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
609:A Comprehensive Look at Types of Curves
381:
360:
358:
194:
14:
626:
507:
400:
391:(3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
577:
394:
421:
355:
619:How to Create a Bell Curve in Excel
508:Volokh, Eugene (February 9, 2015).
432:
389:Essentials of psychological testing
271:International Personality Item Pool
210:high school graduation examinations
24:
25:
660:
602:
510:"In praise of grading on a curve"
364:
538:http://ipip.ori.org/newNorms.htm
206:Standards-based education reform
578:Reese, Michael (May 13, 2013).
571:
553:
542:
120:criterion-referenced assessment
649:Educational evaluation methods
584:The Innovative Instructor Blog
530:
501:
475:
463:
231:These scores are converted to
169:
143:
13:
1:
367:"What is Grading on a Curve?"
348:
327:List of law school GPA curves
281:achievement of all students.
132:originally coined the terms
7:
498:Illinois Learning Standards
300:
181:
154:Graduate Record Examination
10:
665:
586:. Johns Hopkins University
580:"To Curve or Not to Curve"
258:Advantages and limitations
215:
267:Oregon Research Institute
235:(or some other system of
138:criterion-referenced test
387:Cronbach, L. J. (1970).
74:) (also referred to as
644:Educational psychology
312:Educational assessment
634:Psychological testing
403:American Psychologist
322:Grading in education
201:criterion-referenced
195:Criterion-referenced
134:norm-referenced test
113:normative assessment
104:uniform distribution
32:norm-referenced test
252:grade point average
124:ipsative assessment
92:normal distribution
639:Standardized tests
564:2007-03-11 at the
440:"PDF presentation"
64:grading on a curve
56:marking on a curve
18:Grading on a curve
470:stories 5-01.html
342:Standardized test
307:Concept inventory
16:(Redirected from
656:
596:
595:
593:
591:
575:
569:
557:
551:
546:
540:
534:
528:
527:
522:
520:
505:
499:
497:
495:
494:
485:. Archived from
479:
473:
467:
461:
460:
458:
457:
451:
445:. Archived from
444:
436:
430:
425:
419:
418:
415:10.1037/h0049294
398:
392:
385:
379:
378:
376:
374:
362:
332:Macabre constant
52:relative grading
21:
664:
663:
659:
658:
657:
655:
654:
653:
624:
623:
605:
600:
599:
589:
587:
576:
572:
566:Wayback Machine
558:
554:
547:
543:
535:
531:
518:
516:
514:Washington Post
506:
502:
492:
490:
481:
480:
476:
468:
464:
455:
453:
449:
442:
438:
437:
433:
426:
422:
399:
395:
386:
382:
372:
370:
363:
356:
351:
303:
260:
218:
197:
184:
172:
146:
38:) is a type of
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
662:
652:
651:
646:
641:
636:
622:
621:
616:
611:
604:
603:External links
601:
598:
597:
570:
552:
541:
529:
500:
474:
462:
431:
420:
393:
380:
365:Roell, Kelly.
353:
352:
350:
347:
346:
345:
339:
334:
329:
324:
319:
314:
309:
302:
299:
259:
256:
244:
243:
240:
229:
217:
214:
196:
193:
183:
180:
171:
168:
145:
142:
84:grading curves
76:curved grading
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
661:
650:
647:
645:
642:
640:
637:
635:
632:
631:
629:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
606:
585:
581:
574:
567:
563:
560:
556:
549:
545:
539:
533:
526:
515:
511:
504:
489:on 2010-04-14
488:
484:
478:
471:
466:
452:on 2015-09-24
448:
441:
435:
429:
424:
416:
412:
408:
404:
397:
390:
384:
368:
361:
359:
354:
343:
340:
338:
337:Psychometrics
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
272:
268:
263:
255:
253:
248:
241:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:ordinal scale
223:
222:
221:
213:
211:
207:
202:
192:
189:
179:
177:
167:
165:
161:
159:
155:
151:
141:
139:
135:
131:
130:Robert Glaser
127:
125:
121:
116:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
94:(also called
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
588:. Retrieved
583:
573:
555:
544:
532:
524:
517:. Retrieved
513:
503:
491:. Retrieved
487:the original
477:
465:
454:. Retrieved
447:the original
434:
423:
406:
402:
396:
388:
383:
373:November 13,
371:. Retrieved
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
264:
261:
249:
245:
219:
198:
185:
173:
162:
147:
137:
133:
128:
117:
112:
88:distribution
83:
80:bell curving
79:
75:
63:
55:
51:
35:
31:
29:
409:: 510–522.
369:. About.com
233:percentiles
170:Other types
156:(GRE), and
144:Common uses
82:, or using
628:Categories
493:2010-04-14
456:2006-07-21
428:Assessment
349:References
199:A test is
100:bell curve
48:evaluation
44:assessment
237:quantiles
562:Archived
317:Equating
301:See also
188:ipsative
182:Ipsative
176:ipsative
164:IQ tests
96:Gaussian
590:May 13,
216:Methods
519:18 May
186:In an
108:sample
450:(PDF)
443:(PDF)
62:) or
46:, or
592:2013
521:2017
375:2013
136:and
122:and
72:CanE
40:test
411:doi
269:'s
150:SAT
68:AmE
60:BrE
36:NRT
630::
582:.
523:.
512:.
407:18
405:.
357:^
239:).
152:,
140:.
78:,
70:,
54:,
42:,
30:A
594:.
496:.
459:.
417:.
413::
377:.
66:(
58:(
34:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.