Knowledge

Feedback loop (email)

Source đź“ť

20: 239: 103:), and they can analyze the complaint rate and hence how their advertising meets market expectations. By unsubscribing users who complain, marketers reduce their overall complaint rate per IP or domain, ensuring that targeted mail is much more likely to reach subscribers who actually want to receive it. 143:
As sketched above, the process implies that Spencer, besides being the author (or sender) of the message, is connected to the postmaster responsible for his mail domain. Subscribing to an FBL usually involves the postmaster's authorization. An FBL subscriber may or may not forward abuse reports to
303:
The majority of ESP offering Feedback Loop do not include in the report the email address of the recipient, who marked the message. This makes it impossible to remove the recipient from the mailing list, where it has subscribed. Such ESPs' practice encourages mailing-lists providers to send
91:. Whether and how to provide an FBL is a choice of the MP. End users should report abuse at their mailbox provider's reporting hub, so as to also help filtering. As an alternative, competent users may send abuse complaints directly, acting as mailbox providers themselves. 299:
Some FBLs provide no option for communicating feedback automatically to multiple parties: the sender, the ESP (if one is involved), or the upstream datacenter/network address provider—as currently construed by the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) "Follow the Money"
144:
the relevant authors. If no subscribers exist for a given mail domain, Isaac can omit sending an abuse report at all. In fact, subscriptions have to be done one by one, a laborious task that mail domains not engaged in mass mailing may want to skip.
291:
The feedback loops fail to meet the generic anti-spam criterion of not generating more email messages. Even if the amount of feedback is just a fraction of the number of messages that an ESP sends out, most ESPs are not yet organized for handling
31:
are the two formal endpoints of the feedback loop (blue arrow). Senders need to subscribe, possibly using a web form similar to the one depicted on the upper left corner, in order to become feedback consumers. Recipients typically click a
295:
Using the same button for both abuse reports and list unsubscribe implies guesswork by the (automated) help desk. For example, it does not ease reporting to a list owner that a specific post in the (non moderated) list is actually
304:
individualized message to each recipient (contrary to sending everybody literally the same message), so that mailing list providers can extract from the individualized message coming over the feedback loop the original recipient.
109:, when playing the sender's role, are very sensitive to how sending mail on behalf of their customers may affect their reputation. Monitoring the complaint rate is one of the ways they can control what their users are sending. 452: 187:, whose design is inherited by ARF, an abuse report consists of a human readable part, followed by a machine readable part, and the original message. The report is characterized by a 459: 221:
Google's Gmail is beta testing a non-traditional FBL with select ESPs. Gmail uses their own format—an aggregate report that reveals spam rate per notable sender.
225:
reports that the Gmail FBL, developed and launched by Julian Tempelsman and Sri Somanchi, is effective at identifying spam that other anti-spam systems miss.
165:
For years, end users have been told not to trust email unsubscribe links, so many users hit the spam button as an alternative to unsubscribing. Consequently,
247: 99:
Marketers striving for their mail to be delivered have a twofold advantage: they can remove subscribers that don't want to receive that kind of advertising (
169:
may act as unsubscribe in some cases. One of the reasons not to hit unsubscribe links is to avoid confirming that the message had been received and opened.
162:
noted that a majority of respondents to a survey on spam reporting marked messages as spam based solely on the subject and sender data.
60:(MP) forwards the complaints originating from their users to the sender's organizations. MPs can receive users' complaints by placing 252: 1096: 1136: 208: 1111: 924: 106: 627: 1302: 152:
addresses the latter shortcoming by proposing auto-subscribe just-in-time FBLs, which can be started by sending an
527: 345: 416: 438: 1091: 973: 825: 792: 759: 726: 696: 606: 523:
Creation and Use of Email Feedback Reports: An Applicability Statement for the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF)
496: 854: 1131: 556:
Feedback Providers MUST provide a way for report recipients to request that no further reports be sent.
263: 887: 1106: 1003: 968: 819: 786: 753: 720: 600: 490: 395: 387: 941: 917: 847: 814: 781: 748: 715: 595: 485: 314: 179: 129: 84:, has to come to an agreement with each MP from which they want to collect users' complaints. 569: 1146: 1116: 1083: 631: 541: 359: 8: 1121: 963: 259: 1297: 1287: 1101: 1044: 910: 432: 902: 1242: 1189: 531: 517: 349: 145: 81: 57: 1254: 1224: 958: 897: 682: 544: 521: 362: 339: 149: 139:
part, and sends it to Spencer if Spencer has signed up to receive that feedback.
121:
Alice complains to Isaac (her ISP or MP) about the message, e.g. by hitting the
1292: 1264: 1234: 1184: 1126: 1049: 1039: 983: 383: 319: 184: 88: 1281: 1199: 1164: 1064: 998: 1247: 1204: 1174: 1024: 635: 77: 69: 657: 417:"What are feedback loops (fbl's) and how can they help my deliverability?" 1209: 1019: 591: 100: 258:
Please help rewrite or integrate negative information to other sections
19: 1179: 1156: 1029: 988: 950: 882: 419:. Email Manual. 2009-07-15. Archived from the original on 6 March 2012 1214: 1194: 1069: 661: 536: 354: 73: 1259: 1169: 1054: 1034: 933: 700: 222: 53: 23:
A sender and a recipient connected by a mailbox provider (MP). The
1141: 1059: 993: 683:"Best Practices for Senders: A Gmail Perspective (slides 47, 48)" 65: 877: 697:"Gmail's Spam Feedback Loop: SendGrid's First-hand Experience" 156:
with further directives (at a minimum, a way to unsubscribe).
1219: 978: 159: 136: 132: 892: 183:(ARF) is the standard format for FBL reports. Much like 932: 846:
Deborah Platt Majoras; et al. (September 2004).
845: 135:
part, or (less commonly) a standalone message/rfc822
341:
Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
288:
button is said by some to often be used improperly.
883:Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group - list of FBL´s 453:"Your Reputation Holds the Key to Deliverability" 1279: 516: 16:Process of forwarding user complaints to senders 36:button on a web mail page to start the process. 382: 918: 713: 567: 888:Feedback loop links for some email providers 561: 128:Isaac encapsulates the message as either an 812: 779: 746: 590: 925: 911: 535: 483: 353: 337: 458:. ReturnPath. 2008-08-18. Archived from 18: 191:field whose values may indicate one of 87:Feedback loops are one of the ways for 1280: 893:Abuse Feedback Reporting Format (ARF) 906: 52:, is an inter-organizational form of 848:"A CAN-SPAM Informant Reward System" 248:"criticism" or "controversy" section 232: 172: 112: 13: 1112:Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse 218:(JMR), also use their own format. 14: 1314: 1097:Challenge–response spam filtering 934:Unsolicited digital communication 871: 118:Spencer sends a message to Alice. 338:J.D. Falk, ed. (November 2011). 237: 898:Importance of Customer Feedback 878:Universal Feedback Loop Service 839: 806: 773: 740: 707: 689: 675: 658:"Services for Senders and ISPs" 650: 620: 584: 570:"Getting in the Feedback Loop" 510: 477: 445: 409: 388:"Adding a spam button to MUAs" 376: 331: 207:(more types are registered at 1: 325: 251:may compromise the article's 714:Rich Kulawiec (2008-11-13). 634:. 2007-01-19. Archived from 568:Derek Harding (2006-09-07). 228: 214:Microsoft, who use the name 94: 7: 855:US Federal Trade Commission 628:"Spam Unsubscribe Services" 308: 10: 1319: 1132:Naive Bayes spam filtering 813:Barry Shein (2008-11-13). 780:Barry Shein (2008-11-13). 747:Chris Lewis (2008-11-12). 1233: 1155: 1082: 1012: 949: 940: 437:: CS1 maint: unfit URL ( 1303:Complaints organizations 1107:Disposable email address 969:Directory harvest attack 484:J.D. Falk (2008-11-11). 154:unsolicited abuse report 76:. The message sender's 50:complaint feedback loop 315:Abuse Reporting Format 180:Abuse Reporting Format 130:Abuse Reporting Format 82:email service provider 48:), sometimes called a 37: 22: 1117:Email authentication 685:. MAAWG. 2014-02-20. 632:The Spamhaus Project 964:Bulk email software 520:, ed. (June 2012). 386:(9 December 2009). 216:Junk Mail Reporting 68:pages, or in their 260:through discussion 38: 1275: 1274: 1102:Context filtering 1078: 1077: 281: 280: 173:Reporting formats 113:Reporting process 64:buttons on their 29:feedback consumer 25:feedback provider 1310: 1243:Advance-fee scam 1190:Keyword stuffing 947: 946: 927: 920: 913: 904: 903: 866: 865: 863: 861: 852: 843: 837: 836: 834: 832: 824:(Mailing list). 815:"FeedBack loops" 810: 804: 803: 801: 799: 791:(Mailing list). 782:"FeedBack loops" 777: 771: 770: 768: 766: 758:(Mailing list). 749:"FeedBack loops" 744: 738: 737: 735: 733: 725:(Mailing list). 716:"FeedBack loops" 711: 705: 704: 693: 687: 686: 679: 673: 672: 670: 668: 654: 648: 647: 645: 643: 624: 618: 617: 615: 613: 605:(Mailing list). 596:"FeedBack loops" 588: 582: 581: 579: 577: 565: 559: 558: 553: 551: 539: 537:10.17487/RFC6650 518:Murray Kucherawy 514: 508: 507: 505: 503: 495:(Mailing list). 486:"FeedBack loops" 481: 475: 474: 472: 470: 464: 457: 449: 443: 442: 436: 428: 426: 424: 413: 407: 406: 404: 402: 380: 374: 373: 371: 369: 357: 355:10.17487/RFC6449 335: 276: 273: 267: 241: 240: 233: 58:mailbox provider 1318: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1271: 1255:Make Money Fast 1229: 1225:URL redirection 1151: 1074: 1008: 959:Address munging 936: 931: 874: 869: 859: 857: 850: 844: 840: 830: 828: 811: 807: 797: 795: 778: 774: 764: 762: 745: 741: 731: 729: 712: 708: 695: 694: 690: 681: 680: 676: 666: 664: 656: 655: 651: 641: 639: 626: 625: 621: 611: 609: 589: 585: 575: 573: 566: 562: 549: 547: 515: 511: 501: 499: 482: 478: 468: 466: 462: 455: 451: 450: 446: 430: 429: 422: 420: 415: 414: 410: 400: 398: 381: 377: 367: 365: 336: 332: 328: 311: 277: 271: 268: 257: 246:This article's 242: 238: 231: 185:bounce messages 175: 115: 97: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1316: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1273: 1272: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1239: 1237: 1235:Internet fraud 1231: 1230: 1228: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1185:Google bombing 1182: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1161: 1159: 1153: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1127:List poisoning 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1088: 1086: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1016: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1007: 1006: 1001: 996: 991: 986: 984:Email spoofing 981: 976: 971: 966: 961: 955: 953: 944: 938: 937: 930: 929: 922: 915: 907: 901: 900: 895: 890: 885: 880: 873: 872:External links 870: 868: 867: 838: 805: 772: 739: 706: 688: 674: 649: 619: 594:(2008-11-13). 583: 560: 509: 476: 465:on 11 May 2013 444: 408: 384:John R. Levine 375: 329: 327: 324: 323: 322: 320:Spam reporting 317: 310: 307: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 279: 278: 245: 243: 236: 230: 227: 174: 171: 141: 140: 126: 119: 114: 111: 96: 93: 89:reporting spam 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1315: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1283: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1200:Referrer spam 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1158: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1065:Telemarketing 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1011: 1005: 1002: 1000: 999:Pink contract 997: 995: 992: 990: 987: 985: 982: 980: 977: 975: 972: 970: 967: 965: 962: 960: 957: 956: 954: 952: 948: 945: 943: 939: 935: 928: 923: 921: 916: 914: 909: 908: 905: 899: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 875: 856: 849: 842: 827: 823: 821: 816: 809: 794: 790: 788: 783: 776: 761: 757: 755: 750: 743: 728: 724: 722: 717: 710: 703:. 2014-03-28. 702: 698: 692: 684: 678: 663: 659: 653: 638:on 2009-03-09 637: 633: 629: 623: 608: 604: 602: 597: 593: 587: 571: 564: 557: 546: 543: 538: 533: 529: 525: 524: 519: 513: 498: 494: 492: 487: 480: 461: 454: 448: 440: 434: 418: 412: 397: 393: 389: 385: 379: 364: 361: 356: 351: 347: 343: 342: 334: 330: 321: 318: 316: 313: 312: 302: 298: 294: 290: 287: 283: 282: 275: 265: 261: 255: 254: 249: 244: 235: 234: 226: 224: 219: 217: 212: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189:Feedback-Type 186: 182: 181: 170: 168: 163: 161: 157: 155: 151: 147: 138: 134: 131: 127: 124: 120: 117: 116: 110: 108: 104: 102: 92: 90: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 42:feedback loop 35: 30: 26: 21: 1248:Lottery scam 1205:Scraper site 1175:Doorway page 1045:Mobile phone 1025:Cold calling 858:. Retrieved 841: 829:. Retrieved 822:mailing list 818: 808: 796:. Retrieved 789:mailing list 785: 775: 763:. Retrieved 756:mailing list 752: 742: 730:. Retrieved 723:mailing list 719: 709: 691: 677: 665:. Retrieved 652: 640:. Retrieved 636:the original 622: 610:. Retrieved 603:mailing list 599: 586: 574:. Retrieved 563: 555: 548:. Retrieved 522: 512: 500:. Retrieved 493:mailing list 489: 479: 467:. Retrieved 460:the original 447: 421:. Retrieved 411: 399:. Retrieved 391: 378: 366:. Retrieved 340: 333: 285: 269: 250: 220: 215: 213: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 178: 176: 166: 164: 158: 153: 142: 122: 105: 98: 86: 78:organization 70:email client 61: 49: 45: 41: 39: 33: 28: 24: 1210:Social spam 1122:Greylisting 1092:Client-side 1020:Auto dialer 831:18 November 798:18 November 765:18 November 732:16 November 667:11 November 642:16 November 612:18 November 592:John Levine 576:16 November 502:18 November 469:16 November 368:30 November 286:report spam 167:report spam 123:report spam 101:listwashing 80:, often an 62:report spam 56:by which a 1282:Categories 1215:Spam blogs 1180:Forum spam 1157:Spamdexing 1030:Flyposting 989:Image spam 951:Email spam 860:8 November 326:References 253:neutrality 74:help desks 1298:Anti-spam 1195:Link farm 1165:Blog spam 1084:Anti-spam 1050:Newsgroup 1040:Messaging 942:Protocols 662:Microsoft 300:strategy. 264:talk page 229:Criticism 95:Rationale 72:, or via 1288:Spamming 1260:Phishing 1170:Cloaking 1147:Spamhaus 1055:Robocall 1035:Junk fax 701:SendGrid 433:cite web 401:22 April 309:See also 272:May 2014 223:SendGrid 54:feedback 27:and the 1142:SpamCop 1060:Spambot 1004:Spambot 994:Joe job 572:. ClikZ 550:28 June 423:15 July 262:on the 125:button. 66:webmail 148:  1293:Email 1265:Voice 1220:Sping 1137:SORBS 1013:Other 979:DNSWL 974:DNSBL 851:(PDF) 463:(PDF) 456:(PDF) 296:spam. 205:other 203:, or 201:virus 197:fraud 193:abuse 160:Ipsos 1070:VoIP 862:2011 833:2008 826:IRTF 820:ASRG 800:2008 793:IRTF 787:ASRG 767:2008 760:IRTF 754:ASRG 734:2008 727:IRTF 721:ASRG 669:2011 644:2008 614:2008 607:IRTF 601:ASRG 578:2008 552:2012 545:6650 528:IETF 504:2008 497:IRTF 491:ASRG 471:2008 439:link 425:2009 403:2011 396:ASRG 392:mail 370:2011 363:6449 346:IETF 284:The 209:IANA 177:The 150:6650 137:MIME 133:MIME 107:ESPs 34:spam 542:RFC 532:doi 360:RFC 350:doi 292:it. 211:). 146:RFC 46:FBL 1284:: 853:. 817:. 784:. 751:. 718:. 699:. 660:. 630:. 598:. 554:. 540:. 530:. 526:. 488:. 435:}} 431:{{ 394:. 390:. 358:. 348:. 344:. 199:, 195:, 40:A 926:e 919:t 912:v 864:. 835:. 802:. 769:. 736:. 671:. 646:. 616:. 580:. 534:: 506:. 473:. 441:) 427:. 405:. 372:. 352:: 274:) 270:( 266:. 256:. 44:(

Index


feedback
mailbox provider
webmail
email client
help desks
organization
email service provider
reporting spam
listwashing
ESPs
Abuse Reporting Format
MIME
MIME
RFC
6650
Ipsos
Abuse Reporting Format
bounce messages
IANA
SendGrid
"criticism" or "controversy" section
neutrality
through discussion
talk page
Abuse Reporting Format
Spam reporting
Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
IETF
doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑