202:
take the place of the first (or the term proposed for it) the explicatum. The explicandum may belong to everyday language or to a previous stage in the development of scientific language. The explicatum must be given by explicit rules for its use, for example, by a definition which incorporates it into a well-constructed system of scientific either logicomathematical or empirical concepts."
176:
that is, the rather naive understandings that most of us have about how life, the universe, and everything work." Explications of abstract concepts, such as color, do not list any scientific facts about the object or concrete definitions. Instead, the explications use comparisons and examples from the real world.
201:
As argued by Carnap (1950), in science and philosophy, "explication consists in transforming a given more or less inexact concept into an exact one or, rather, in replacing the first by the second. We call the given concept (or the term used for it) the explicandum, and the exact concept proposed to
95:
An explication in the
Carnapian sense is purely stipulative, and thus a subclass of normative definitions. Hence, an explication can not be true or false, just more or less suitable for its purpose. (Cf. Rorty's argument about the purpose and value of philosophy in Rorty (2003), "A pragmatist view of
175:
Explications in the
Natural Semantic Metalanguage are neither exact dictionary definitions, nor encyclopedic explanations of a concept. They often differ slightly depending upon the personal experiences of the person writing them. In this way, they can be said to "rely heavily on 'folk theories,'
99:
Examples of inexact daily life concepts in need of explication are our concepts of cause and of conditionals. Our daily life concept of cause does not distinguish between necessary causes, sufficient causes, complete causes etc. Each of these more precise concepts is an explication of our natural
119:
Others' reviews of Carnap's argument offer additional insights about the nature of explication. In particular, Bonolio's paper (2003) "Kant’s
Explication and Carnap’s Explication: The Redde Rationem", and Maher's (2007) "Explication defended", add weight to the argument that explication is an
107:
for propositions of the form "If p, then q" for situations where "p" is true. (Most of us probably don't have any clear intuitions regarding the truth conditions of the sentence "If I go out in the sun, I will get sunburned" in situations where I never go out in the sun.) An explication of the
162:
X feels happy = sometimes someone thinks something like this: something good happened to something I wanted this I don't want other things now because of this, someone feels something good X feels like this
83:. Explication can be regarded as a scientific process which transforms and replaces "an inexact prescientific concept" (which Carnap calls the explicandum), with a "new exact concept" (which he calls the explicatum). A description and
128:
The word "explicate" is a verb referring to the process of explicating. The word "explication" is a noun referring to the outcome of that process: the explicative work itself. As conceptual clarity is an important element of
167:
What sets the
Natural Semantic Metalanguage Theory's explications apart from previous theories, is that these explications can fit into natural language, even if it sounds very awkward. For example:
235:, and explication per se, is an interpretative process where the resulting new knowledge, new insights or new meanings, are open to subsequent debate and disaffirmation by others.
229:
In this process, explication often involves a line-by-line or episode-by-episode commentary on what is going on in a text. While initially this might seem reasonably innocuous,
87:
of the nature and impact of the new explicit knowledge is usually called an "explication". The new explicit knowledge draws on, and is an improvement upon, previous knowledge.
116:
Carnap's argument provides a helpful foundation in understanding and clarifying the nature and value of explication in defining and describing "new" knowledge.
38:) is the process of drawing out the meaning of something which is not clearly defined, so as to make explicit what is currently left implicit. The term
96:
contemporary analytic philosophy", in
Egginton, W. and Sandbothe, M. (Eds), The Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy, SUNY Press, New York, NY.)
145:
theory, explications are semantic representations of vocabulary. These explications are made up of a very limited set of words called
301:
360:
369:
205:
In this context, 'explication' is now regarded as "an appropriate methodology for formal philosophy". (Maher, 2007).
133:, it is important to use words according to their proper definitions so as to avoid causing unnecessary confusion.
142:
388:
17:
393:
324:
231:
214:
194:
8:
252:
130:
43:
403:
398:
299:
Bonolio, G. (2003). "Kant’s
Explication and Carnap’s Explication: The Redde Rationem",
209:
47:
320:
108:
conditional will also specify truth conditions for situations where "p" is not true.
104:
373:
146:
54:
was the first to coin the term in an analytic philosophical approach in his book
31:
66:
when referring to the analysis and criticism of different forms of literature.
219:
59:
367:
The Close
Reading of Poetry: A Practical Introduction and Guide to Explication
329:
382:
366:
341:
223:
80:
51:
179:
79:
In analytic philosophy, the concept of explication was first developed by
84:
315:
Harrison, S. E. (2006). "Explication without words: A composer's view",
222:), where additional understandings and meanings are derived from the "
149:
which are considered to have universal meaning across all languages.
355:
336:
123:
212:, the term 'explication' is used as a proxy for the term
285:. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. pp. 69–73.
345:, Volume 86, Number 2, July 2007, pp. 331–341.
69:
380:
330:Introducing explication. Online since April 2013
120:appropriate methodology for formal philosophy.
111:
305:Vol. 43, No. 3, Issue 171, pp. 289–298.
90:
152:An example of an explication of the word
312:, University of Chicago Press, Illinois.
171:The clown looks The clown looks like .
136:
14:
381:
319:, August, Vol.13 (3), pp. 59–63.
280:
302:International Philosophical Quarterly
276:
274:
272:
58:, while the term is supplanted with
361:Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
103:Natural language will only specify
24:
310:Logical foundations of probability
226:" of (say) a poem, novel or play.
56:Logical Foundations of Probability
25:
415:
349:
269:
245:
70:Carnap's notion of explication
13:
1:
293:
143:natural semantic metalanguage
124:Use of the word "explication"
112:Reviews of Carnap's argument
7:
253:"Definition of EXPLICATION"
10:
420:
74:
281:Murphy, M. Lynne (2010).
198:have different meanings.
317:Organisations and People
238:
184:, and literary criticism
169:
160:
91:On explication and truth
257:www.merriam-webster.com
337:"Explication defended"
35:
232:explication de texte
215:explication de texte
195:explication de texte
182:explication de texte
137:Semantic explication
64:Explication de Texte
389:Analytic philosophy
308:Carnap, R. (1950).
131:analytic philosophy
44:analytic philosophy
394:Literary criticism
372:2013-04-06 at the
210:literary criticism
100:concept of cause.
48:literary criticism
335:Maher, P. (2007)
16:(Redirected from
411:
287:
286:
278:
267:
266:
264:
263:
249:
208:By contrast, in
105:truth conditions
42:is used in both
21:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
379:
378:
374:Wayback Machine
358:article in the
352:
296:
291:
290:
283:Lexical Meaning
279:
270:
261:
259:
251:
250:
246:
241:
186:
173:
172:
165:
164:
147:semantic primes
139:
126:
114:
93:
77:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
417:
407:
406:
401:
396:
391:
377:
376:
364:
351:
350:External links
348:
347:
346:
333:
327:
313:
306:
295:
292:
289:
288:
268:
243:
242:
240:
237:
220:Gustave Lanson
185:
178:
170:
161:
138:
135:
125:
122:
113:
110:
92:
89:
76:
73:
71:
68:
60:Gustave Lanson
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
386:
384:
375:
371:
368:
365:
363:
362:
357:
354:
353:
344:
343:
342:Studia Logica
338:
334:
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
307:
304:
303:
298:
297:
284:
277:
275:
273:
258:
254:
248:
244:
236:
234:
233:
227:
225:
224:close reading
221:
218:(proposed by
217:
216:
211:
206:
203:
199:
197:
196:
191:
183:
180:Explication,
177:
168:
159:
158:
155:
150:
148:
144:
134:
132:
121:
117:
109:
106:
101:
97:
88:
86:
82:
81:Rudolf Carnap
67:
65:
61:
57:
53:
52:Rudolf Carnap
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
19:
359:
340:
316:
309:
300:
282:
260:. Retrieved
256:
247:
230:
228:
213:
207:
204:
200:
193:
189:
187:
181:
174:
166:
156:
153:
151:
140:
127:
118:
115:
102:
98:
94:
78:
63:
55:
39:
27:
26:
18:Explications
356:Explication
190:explication
85:explanation
62:’s idea of
40:explication
36:Explikation
28:Explication
383:Categories
294:References
262:2021-01-21
188:The terms
404:Semiotics
399:Semantics
325:1350-6269
370:Archived
141:In the
75:Summary
323:
32:German
239:Notes
154:happy
321:ISSN
192:and
46:and
385::
339:,
271:^
255:.
50:.
34::
332:.
265:.
157::
30:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.