Knowledge

Dhar iron pillar

Source πŸ“

68:). A fourth portion is believed to be missing. The original pillar tapered from bottom to top: the bottom fragment has a square cross-section; the middle fragment has square and octagonal cross-sections, and the top fragment has an octagonal cross-section with a small circular part at the end. The total length of the three fragments is 13.21 metres (43 ft 4 in), which indicates that the original pillar must have been twice as high as the 22: 85: 294:'s guest house. In February 1902, this piece was fixed in a masonry basement at Lal Bagh public gardens near the Anand High School. Henry Cousens of ASI later had it removed from the basement to measure it. The piece was then moved to the Anand High School museum. From there, it was moved to Lat Masjid, similar to the second piece. 269:
This piece is the smaller part of the fragment broken during Bahadur Shah's reign. Henry Cousens (1902–03) measured its length as 3.5 metres (11 ft 7 in). The part with the square cross-section measured 2.6 metres (8 ft 6 in), while the part with the octagonal section measured 0.9
209:
This piece is the larger part of the fragment broken during Bahadur Shah's reign. Henry Cousens (1902–03) measured its length as 7.4 metres (24 ft 3 in). Klaus Roessler (1995) found it to be 7.4 metres (24 ft 2 in) long. It has a square cross-section. Roessler estimated its weight
282:
This is the smallest piece, which was moved to Mandu during Dilawar Khan's reign. Its length is 2.3 metres (7 ft 6 in) according to both Coussen and Roessler. It is mostly of an octagonal cross-section, except one 203.2 millimetres (8 in) circular part at the end. Roessler estimated
273:
The 4.0 metres (13 ft) piece was removed from the Lat Masjid site at an unknown time. In February 1903, Henry Cousens of ASI found it in Anand High School, where a museum had been set up in 1902. The museum was relocated to another site between the years 1922 and 1942. When this happened, the
142:
The two largest fragments have a number of holes at irregular intervals, on all sides. The depth of the holes ranges from 41–76 millimetres (1.6–3 in), and their diameter ranges from 30–76 millimetres (1.2–3 in). Because they are distributed unevenly, they do not appear to be slots for
196:
Now, three fragments of the pillar are placed horizontally on a platform near Lat Masjid. These fragments were moved by ASI to their present position in 1980. The combined height of the three fragments is 13.2 metres (43 ft 4 in), and their total weight is estimated at 7,300 kilograms
147:). Cousens speculated that these were used by the forgers and welders to handle the pillar with their instruments during the manufacturing process. Roessler agreed with this hypothesis, and proposed that these slots were also used to hold the pillar upright using iron anchors. 302:
The third piece has a fractured top surface, which indicates that a fourth piece of the original pillar is missing. Klaus Roessler (1995) estimated the length of this piece at 1.0 metre (3 ft 3 in). Henry Cousens hypothesized that the fourth piece had a
72:. The combined weight of the fragments is estimated at around 7,300 kilograms (16,100 lb), which is at least 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb) more than the Delhi pillar's weight. At the time of its erection, it was probably the largest 270:
metres (3 ft 1 in). Klaus Roessler (1995) found this piece to be 3.6 metres (11 ft 8 in) long. Roessler estimated its weight at 1,800 kilograms (4,000 lb).
821:
Amitava Ray; S. K. Dhua; R. R. Prasad; S. Jha; S. Banerjee (1997). "The ancient 11th century iron pillar at Dhar, India: a microstructural insight into material characteristics".
158:
theorized that smaller sections, measuring 710 millimetres (2 ft 4 in) to 840 millimetres (2 ft 9 in) in length, were joined together to form the pillar.
235:("goldsmith"), and seem to have been engraved while the original pillar was still intact. There are some other symbols and Persian characters scratched on the surface. 341:
Ray et al. (1997) analyzed portions of the two smaller fragments. Their analysis revealed the following chemical composition (weight %):
311:(trident) at the top. As Bhoja was a Shaivite king, R. Balasubramaniam analyzed Shaivite iconography to conclude that the top had a trishula. 197:(16,100 lb). Thus, the original pillar must have been almost twice as high and at least 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb) heavier than the 193:. He made an attempt to carry the large piece to Gujarat. In this process, this part of the pillar toppled and fragmented into two pieces. 963: 92:
The pillar does not bear an inscription mentioning its erector, date or purpose. It is located at Dhar, which was the capital of the
948: 171: 745: 943: 875: 535: 201:. At the time of its erection, it was probably the tallest and the largest forge-welded iron pillar in the world. 96:. According to the local tradition, the pillar commemorates a military victory of the 11th century Paramara king 953: 135:
temple previously occupied the site, and the pillar was originally located at the front of this temple, with a
105: 432:
to analyze its chemical composition. He found that "the composition varied from one location to another":
174:
of Dhar, it broke into at least two pieces. The smaller piece was planted at the Dilawar Khan's Mosque in
895: 334:
According to R. Balasubramaniam and A. V. Ramesh Kumar (2003), the pillar shows "excellent" atmospheric
257:
Until 1980, this piece lay in a sloping position against a masonry terrace. The local kids used it as a
428:
Balasubramaniam (2002) also obtained a small portion of the pillar with ASI's permission, and used an
318:'s Jami Masjid might be a re-shaped version of the Dhar pillar's missing piece. This pillar is called 938: 45:, India. The exact origins of the pillar are unknown, but according to the local tradition, it was a 530: 251: 186: 735: 315: 175: 287: 540: 335: 198: 167: 69: 8: 429: 286:
This piece was brought back from Mandu to Dhar sometime between 1844 and 1893. In 1893,
838: 497: 914: 246:
mentions that he saw this piece lying on ground in Dhar. He ordered it to be taken to
842: 741: 550: 545: 190: 144: 88:
The pillar is located in the south-eastern part of the former fortified city of Dhar
910: 830: 258: 239: 222: 93: 50: 642: 323: 274:
pillar was brought back to the Lat Masjid and placed horizontally on the ground.
958: 731: 46: 42: 834: 933: 927: 261:, because of which a large part of its surface gained a polished appearance. 214: 155: 151: 73: 231: 179: 124: 109: 178:. The larger piece was erected in front of the Lat Masjid constructed by 619: 820: 456: 377: 291: 226: 116: 61: 520:
was 55.8% iron, 27.8% silicon, 16.3% phosphorus, and 0.1% manganese.
461: 357: 802: 64:("pillar mosque"), which is named after the pillar (called "lāṭ" in 493: 474: 308: 243: 136: 108:(ASI) theorized that it was constructed by the later Paramara king 21: 790: 778: 854: 852: 607: 595: 555: 367: 128: 702: 700: 698: 696: 694: 681: 679: 677: 664: 662: 660: 585: 583: 119:, in whose compound the pillar is located, was constructed with 466: 451: 407: 397: 387: 347: 314:
Balasubramaniam also theorizes that an iron pillar in front of
304: 120: 34: 849: 766: 754: 712: 691: 674: 657: 580: 568: 218: 132: 100:, whose knowledge of iron metallurgy can be seen in his book 97: 65: 60:
Three of its fragments are now located near the 15th century
54: 254:. It appears that Jahangir's orders were never carried out. 84: 517: 417: 247: 225:
inscription. This piece also has some names and letters in
38: 442:
Mass of elements other than iron, as % of total mass
250:, intending to use it as a lamp post in the courtyard of 221:'s visit to Dhar was recorded on the pillar in form of a 166:
The iron pillar of Dhar was originally longer than the
150:
The pillar appears to have been built using horizontal
893: 808: 625: 112:
in 1210 CE, from the molten arms of an enemy force.
925: 894:Balasubramaniam, R.; Kumar, A.V. Ramesh (2003). 873: 858: 796: 784: 772: 760: 718: 706: 685: 668: 613: 601: 589: 574: 896:"Corrosion resistance of the Dhar iron pillar" 730: 640: 283:its weight at 940 kilograms (2,070 lb). 131:temples. R. Balasubramaniam theorizes that a 79: 636: 634: 185:In 1531 CE, Dhar came under the control of 631: 307:figure (the Paramara royal emblem) or a 83: 20: 740:. Pearson Education India. p. 15. 329: 290:of ASI noticed it in the garden of the 926: 876:"A new study of the Dhar iron pillar" 643:"The non rusting iron pillar at Dhar" 883:Indian Journal of History of Science 823:Journal of Materials Science Letters 210:at 4,500 kilograms (9,900 lb). 16:Iron column in Madhya Pradesh, India 536:History of metallurgy in South Asia 297: 13: 14: 975: 964:Archaeological artefacts of India 809:Balasubramaniam & Kumar 2003 626:Balasubramaniam & Kumar 2003 949:Metallurgical industry in India 867: 814: 724: 516:The typical composition of the 229:script. The names end in word 106:Archaeological Survey of India 1: 915:10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00074-X 562: 277: 264: 204: 874:Balasubramaniam, R. (2002). 430:electron probe microanalyzer 161: 49:erected by the 11th century 25:Fragments of the Dhar pillar 7: 944:Monumental columns in India 523: 10: 980: 80:Manufacturing and erection 76:iron pillar in the world. 439: 33:is a now-fragmented iron 835:10.1023/A:1018550529070 641:Klaus Roessler (1995). 531:Ancient iron production 737:Technology and Society 139:(trident) at the top. 89: 26: 954:History of metallurgy 647:NML Technical Journal 628:, pp. 2451–2452. 87: 24: 859:Balasubramaniam 2002 797:Balasubramaniam 2002 785:Balasubramaniam 2002 773:Balasubramaniam 2002 761:Balasubramaniam 2002 719:Balasubramaniam 2002 707:Balasubramaniam 2002 686:Balasubramaniam 2002 669:Balasubramaniam 2002 614:Balasubramaniam 2002 602:Balasubramaniam 2002 590:Balasubramaniam 2002 575:Balasubramaniam 2002 541:Iron pillar of Delhi 336:corrosion resistance 330:Chemical composition 199:iron pillar of Delhi 168:iron pillar of Delhi 70:iron pillar of Delhi 799:, pp. 128–129. 787:, pp. 126–127. 616:, pp. 134–135. 604:, pp. 129–130. 492:Portion containing 473:Portion containing 104:. Henry Cousens of 90: 27: 909:(11): 2451–2465. 903:Corrosion Science 747:978-81-317-5641-6 551:Heliodorus pillar 546:Pillars of Ashoka 514: 513: 426: 425: 191:Sultan of Gujarat 971: 939:Paramara dynasty 918: 900: 890: 880: 862: 856: 847: 846: 818: 812: 806: 800: 794: 788: 782: 776: 770: 764: 758: 752: 751: 728: 722: 716: 710: 704: 689: 683: 672: 666: 655: 654: 638: 629: 623: 617: 611: 605: 599: 593: 587: 578: 572: 435: 434: 344: 343: 298:Missing fragment 223:Persian language 94:Paramara dynasty 31:Dhar iron pillar 979: 978: 974: 973: 972: 970: 969: 968: 924: 923: 898: 878: 870: 865: 861:, pp. 137. 857: 850: 819: 815: 811:, p. 2464. 807: 803: 795: 791: 783: 779: 771: 767: 759: 755: 748: 729: 725: 721:, pp. 136. 717: 713: 705: 692: 684: 675: 667: 658: 639: 632: 624: 620: 612: 608: 600: 596: 588: 581: 573: 569: 565: 560: 526: 332: 324:Alauddin Khalji 320:Allaudin's Sang 300: 280: 267: 242:of Akbar's son 207: 172:Muslim conquest 164: 143:lamps (as in a 82: 37:located in the 17: 12: 11: 5: 977: 967: 966: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 936: 920: 919: 891: 869: 866: 864: 863: 848: 829:(5): 371–375. 813: 801: 789: 777: 775:, p. 125. 765: 763:, p. 120. 753: 746: 732:R. V. G. Menon 723: 711: 709:, p. 122. 690: 688:, p. 121. 673: 671:, p. 119. 656: 630: 618: 606: 594: 592:, p. 118. 579: 577:, p. 117. 566: 564: 561: 559: 558: 553: 548: 543: 538: 533: 527: 525: 522: 512: 511: 508: 506: 503: 500: 489: 488: 486: 483: 480: 477: 470: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 446: 445: 438: 424: 423: 420: 414: 413: 410: 404: 403: 400: 394: 393: 390: 384: 383: 380: 374: 373: 370: 364: 363: 360: 354: 353: 350: 331: 328: 322:(spear) after 299: 296: 279: 276: 266: 263: 206: 203: 163: 160: 102:Yuktikalpataru 81: 78: 47:victory column 43:Madhya Pradesh 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 976: 965: 962: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 931: 929: 922: 916: 912: 908: 904: 897: 892: 888: 884: 877: 872: 871: 860: 855: 853: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 817: 810: 805: 798: 793: 786: 781: 774: 769: 762: 757: 749: 743: 739: 738: 733: 727: 720: 715: 708: 703: 701: 699: 697: 695: 687: 682: 680: 678: 670: 665: 663: 661: 652: 648: 644: 637: 635: 627: 622: 615: 610: 603: 598: 591: 586: 584: 576: 571: 567: 557: 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 528: 521: 519: 509: 507: 504: 501: 499: 495: 491: 490: 487: 484: 481: 478: 476: 472: 471: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 447: 443: 437: 436: 433: 431: 421: 419: 416: 415: 411: 409: 406: 405: 401: 399: 396: 395: 391: 389: 386: 385: 381: 379: 376: 375: 371: 369: 366: 365: 361: 359: 356: 355: 351: 349: 346: 345: 342: 339: 337: 327: 325: 321: 317: 312: 310: 306: 295: 293: 292:Dhar Maharaja 289: 284: 275: 271: 262: 260: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240:autobiography 236: 234: 233: 228: 224: 220: 216: 213:In 1598, the 211: 202: 200: 194: 192: 188: 183: 181: 177: 173: 169: 159: 157: 156:Brahm Prakash 153: 152:forge welding 148: 146: 145:deepa-stambha 140: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 113: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 86: 77: 75: 71: 67: 63: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 23: 19: 921: 906: 902: 886: 882: 868:Bibliography 826: 822: 816: 804: 792: 780: 768: 756: 736: 726: 714: 650: 646: 621: 609: 597: 570: 515: 441: 427: 340: 333: 319: 313: 301: 288:A. A. FΓΌhrer 285: 281: 272: 268: 256: 252:Akbar's tomb 237: 230: 212: 208: 195: 187:Bahadur Shah 184: 180:Dilawar Khan 170:. After the 165: 149: 141: 114: 110:Arjunavarman 101: 91: 74:forge-welded 59: 30: 28: 18: 154:technique. 928:Categories 889:: 115–151. 563:References 457:Phosphorus 378:Phosphorus 278:Fragment 3 265:Fragment 2 227:Devanagari 205:Fragment 1 117:Lat Masjid 62:Lat Masjid 843:134653889 653:(5): 145. 462:Manganese 358:Manganese 182:in 1405. 162:Fragments 734:(2010). 524:See also 494:pearlite 475:pearlite 362:"trace" 309:trishula 244:Jahangir 217:emperor 137:trishula 51:Paramara 41:town of 556:Stambha 510:0.075% 498:ferrite 412:0.268% 402:0.057% 392:0.003% 382:0.072% 368:Silicon 352:0.013% 841:  744:  505:0.851% 502:0.276% 485:0.013% 482:0.693% 479:0.683% 467:Silver 452:Carbon 408:Nickel 398:Copper 388:Sulfur 372:0.06% 348:Carbon 305:garuda 215:Mughal 189:, the 121:spolia 35:column 959:Bhoja 899:(PDF) 879:(PDF) 839:S2CID 422:rest 316:Mandu 259:slide 219:Akbar 176:Mandu 133:Shiva 125:Hindu 123:from 98:Bhoja 66:Hindi 55:Bhoja 53:king 934:Dhar 742:ISBN 518:slag 496:and 418:Iron 248:Agra 238:The 232:Soni 129:Jain 127:and 115:The 39:Dhar 29:The 911:doi 831:doi 930:: 907:45 905:. 901:. 887:37 885:. 881:. 851:^ 837:. 827:16 825:. 693:^ 676:^ 659:^ 651:37 649:. 645:. 633:^ 582:^ 444:) 338:. 326:. 57:. 917:. 913:: 845:. 833:: 750:. 440:(

Index


column
Dhar
Madhya Pradesh
victory column
Paramara
Bhoja
Lat Masjid
Hindi
iron pillar of Delhi
forge-welded

Paramara dynasty
Bhoja
Archaeological Survey of India
Arjunavarman
Lat Masjid
spolia
Hindu
Jain
Shiva
trishula
deepa-stambha
forge welding
Brahm Prakash
iron pillar of Delhi
Muslim conquest
Mandu
Dilawar Khan
Bahadur Shah

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑