Knowledge

Coverage map

Source 📝

67: 164:
indicate the area in which a certain signal strength is delivered. Even if it is 100% accurate (which it never is), a major factor on whether a signal is receivable depends very much on whether the receiving apparatus is sensitive enough to use a signal of that level. Commercial receivers can vary
171:
The quality of reception can be very different at places only short distances apart, and this phenomenon is more apparent as the transmission frequency increases. Inevitably small pockets of poor reception may exist within the main service area that cannot be shown on the map due to scale issues.
62:
Typically a coverage map will indicate the area within which the user can expect to obtain good reception of the service in question using standard equipment under normal operating conditions. Additionally, the map may also separately denote supplementary service areas where good reception may be
205:
There are limitations inherent to the way in which data collection for coverage maps is carried out. Traditional coverage maps are based on models, constructed from readings taken by dedicated network testers. This often means that coverage maps show the theoretical capacity of the network rather
163:
Often coverage maps show general coverage for large regions and therefore any boundary indicated should not be interpreted as a rigid limit. The biggest cause of uncertainty for a coverage map is the quality (mainly sensitivity) of receiving apparatus used. A coverage map may be produced to
126:
The receiving antenna height of 10m dates from the 1950s when receivers were relatively insensitive and used rooftop antennas. Although this may seem unrealistic for typical situations today, when combined with the above threshold it is considered a good
214:
have emerged that provide coverage maps based on information crowdsourced from consumer applications. The advantage of this approach is that the coverage maps show network reach and performance as it is experienced by its users.
179:, or simply being located on high ground can yield good signal strengths well outside the indicated area. The significance of local geographical conditions cannot be over emphasised and this was underlined by 187:" to the transmitter. Average signal levels, taken at the same height, varied by up to 6 dB, and for individual frequencies by up to 14 dB. In RF reception terms these figures are huge differences. 79:
The field strength that the marked service boundary on a coverage map represents will be defined by whoever produces the map, but typical examples are as follows:
151:
defines the daytime service area boundary as a minimum field strength of 2 mV/m. At night, the service area of mediumwave services can be drastically reduced by
222:
to fill in bad reception areas that become apparent once the high power transmitter's coverage map has identified where the network is deficient.
211: 165: 128: 63:
obtained but other stations may be stronger, or where the reception may be variable but the service may still be usable.
268: 183:
which revealed the signal reception conditions around a typical house. The site did not have the critical "
288: 184: 202:, no network is perfect, so coverage breaks within the general coverage areas are still possible. 131:
for providing coverage to more sensitive modern receivers used without external rooftop antennas.
152: 199: 239: 298: 51: 180: 92: 8: 173: 219: 191: 103:
defines the service area boundary for stereo services as corresponding to an average
43: 140: 176: 293: 104: 282: 66: 195: 35: 207: 144: 31: 263: 47: 39: 206:
than its real-world performance. In recent years companies such as
168:
in their sensitivity, thus perception of coverage can vary widely.
116: 108: 96: 115:/m) at a height of 10 m above ground level. For mono it is 48 27: 23: 120: 112: 26:
transmitting stations. Typically these may be produced for
148: 100: 88: 273: 264:
The Transmission Gallery: Index of UK TV coverage maps
16:
Map indicating service areas of transmitting stations
240:"Top 10 Cell Phone Coverage Map Comparison In 2022" 172:Conversely, the use of sensitive equipment, high 280: 42:networks. Such maps are alternatively known as 198:attempt to design their networks to eliminate 22:are designed to indicate the service areas of 50:networks, a coverage map is often known as a 274:An example of a crowd-sourced coverage map 218:Often companies will construct low power 57: 65: 281: 269:TV Fool: Index of US TV coverage maps 82: 74: 13: 134: 14: 310: 257: 232: 158: 1: 225: 7: 10: 315: 70:Example radio coverage map 185:line-of-sight propagation 155:from distant stations. 153:co-channel interference 71: 58:Definition of coverage 69: 220:satellite stations 72: 24:radiocommunication 289:Mobile technology 83:VHF(FM) / Band II 75:Technical details 38:networks and for 306: 251: 250: 248: 247: 236: 36:mobile telephone 314: 313: 309: 308: 307: 305: 304: 303: 279: 278: 260: 255: 254: 245: 243: 238: 237: 233: 228: 161: 137: 135:MF / Mediumwave 119:(relative to 1 111:(relative to 1 85: 77: 60: 17: 12: 11: 5: 312: 302: 301: 296: 291: 277: 276: 271: 266: 259: 258:External links 256: 253: 252: 230: 229: 227: 224: 160: 157: 136: 133: 105:field strength 84: 81: 76: 73: 59: 56: 34:stations, for 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 311: 300: 297: 295: 292: 290: 287: 286: 284: 275: 272: 270: 267: 265: 262: 261: 241: 235: 231: 223: 221: 216: 213: 209: 203: 201: 197: 193: 188: 186: 182: 181:an experiment 178: 175: 169: 167: 156: 154: 150: 146: 142: 132: 130: 124: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 80: 68: 64: 55: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 21: 20:Coverage maps 299:Broadcasting 244:. Retrieved 242:. 2021-11-22 234: 217: 204: 196:broadcasters 189: 170: 162: 138: 125: 86: 78: 61: 19: 18: 159:Limitations 46:maps. For 44:propagation 283:Categories 246:2022-01-15 226:References 208:OpenSignal 200:dead zones 145:Mediumwave 32:television 190:Although 52:footprint 48:satellite 40:satellite 212:Sensorly 192:carriers 177:antennas 97:Band II 166:widely 147:, the 107:of 54 99:, the 294:Radio 129:proxy 123:/m). 28:radio 210:and 194:and 174:gain 139:For 95:) / 87:For 149:BBC 101:BBC 89:VHF 30:or 285:: 143:/ 141:MF 121:μV 117:dB 113:μV 109:dB 93:FM 54:. 249:. 91:(

Index

radiocommunication
radio
television
mobile telephone
satellite
propagation
satellite
footprint

VHF
FM
Band II
BBC
field strength
dB
μV
dB
μV
proxy
MF
Mediumwave
BBC
co-channel interference
widely
gain
antennas
an experiment
line-of-sight propagation
carriers
broadcasters

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.