Knowledge

Copyright Renewal Act of 1992

Source đź“ť

509:, works copyrighted in the United States before January 1, 1978, were subject to a renewal system in which the term of copyright was divided into two consecutive terms. Strict time limits were imposed on renewal registration to secure the second term and extending copyright to the maximum length. Current copyright law is contained in title 17 of the United States Code. The Copyright Act of 1976 came into effect on January 1, 1978, and retained the renewal system for works that were copyrighted before 1978 and were still in their first terms on January 1, 1978. The statute, for these works, provides for a first term of copyright protection lasting 28 years, with the possibility for a second term of 47 years. This earlier system is also referred to as an "opt-in" system since authors would have to take the necessary steps required to claim the second term. 244: 560: 115: 63: 22: 676:”, a 1957 hit. Byrd was informed by the Copyright Office that they had not received the renewal application for the song, and hence they would be ending royalty payments. Had the song been renewed, Byrd and her four children would’ve received payments till 2037. This incident was used to convince lawmakers about the need for such an amendment. 512:
The 1992 amending legislation secures this second term for works copyrighted between January 1, 1964, and December 31, 1977, without a renewal registration requirement. This system has been referred to as an "opt-out" system because it provides for copyright protection even if it is not requested by
534:
The renewal copyright is established in the name of the renewal claimant on the effective day of renewal registration. If the renewal registration was not made in the 28th year, the renewal copyright is secured by the party entitled to claim renewal by December 31 of the 28th
529:
does not issue a renewal certificate, though renewal is secured automatically, unless the renewal application and fees are received and registered at the Copyright Office. The Copyright Office outlines the following benefits of filing a Copyright Renewal Application:
516:
Under the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-298) twenty more years were added to the second term for works copyrighted between January 1, 1964, and December 31, 1977. This made the total duration of copyright for these works 95 years.
662:
because of procedural difficulties and mismanagement. In the past several authors had lost considerable royalties on their works because they were not aware of the renewal procedure; this act aimed to prohibit such instances from occurring.
513:
the author of a work. However, if a copyright originally secured before January 1, 1964, was not renewed at the proper time, protection would have expired at the end of the 28th calendar year of the copyright.
545:
However, in cases where no renewal registration was made, important benefits such as statutory damages and attorneys fees can still be secured by filing a renewal registration anytime during the renewal term.
714:, a venture that aimed to scan over a million books to make it available to the public on the Internet. The plaintiffs argued that there are several cases where it is impossible to locate the authors. These 1337: 1184: 1524: 1179: 926: 908: 1612: 1395: 1111: 1922: 1508: 1711: 1419: 1372: 1332: 1735: 1663: 1588: 1500: 73: 2068: 1743: 1727: 1767: 612:
The law specifies the persons who are eligible to claim renewal copyright. Apart from anonymous works, the following are eligible to claim renewal:
1807: 1104: 538:
The Copyright Office issues a renewal certificate which acts as prima facie evidence of the validity of copyright during renewal and extended term.
722:
works. However, the 1992 amendment, by removing the renewal requirement of these works, prevented such works from falling into the public domain.
1671: 1572: 396: 1930: 1484: 577: 132: 35: 1147: 857: 179: 151: 1847: 1580: 1264: 1097: 1863: 1719: 1492: 1831: 655: 158: 89: 1564: 1452: 1321: 1986: 1751: 1655: 1639: 1548: 1355: 760: 755: 165: 2063: 1954: 1759: 1970: 1946: 1823: 1596: 147: 1978: 1879: 1540: 1222: 1153: 1938: 1783: 1695: 1604: 1516: 1286: 1131: 1120: 808: 470: 331: 41: 710:, seeking a declaration that the Copyright Renewal Act was unconstitutional. The Internet Archive is a partner in the 1839: 1631: 599: 216: 198: 49: 729:
affirmed the dismissal on January 22, 2007, saying that they had essentially made the same arguments as made in the
1326: 768: 2028: 1895: 707: 450: 294: 286: 77: 1141: 726: 581: 526: 382: 136: 1887: 1855: 1791: 622:
If there are no immediate family members, and there is a will, then the author's executors can claim renewal.
1016: 1002: 672:
magazine article mentions the complaint of Jacqueline Byrd, widow of Robert Byrd, the songwriter who wrote “
1994: 1962: 1315: 1303: 985: 255: 172: 794:
report to Congress every five years regarding library and archives photocopying of copyrighted materials.
2041: 1476: 737: 1775: 437: 270: 828: 2023: 1871: 1280: 1297: 541:
The right to use derivative works in the extended period might be impacted by renewal registration.
1378: 1309: 1172: 1157: 759:
was included in the Copyright Amendments Act of 1992 as Title II. This act replaced the previous
673: 570: 125: 81: 1167: 1044: 791: 764: 466: 374: 359: 1799: 1647: 1248: 1232: 1217: 1212: 1207: 776: 506: 494: 490: 478: 313: 243: 1227: 911: 775:
until 1996 (four years after the date of enactment). It also included instructions for the
711: 668: 8: 2034: 1460: 772: 1532: 1468: 939: 730: 693: 474: 953: 896:"9th Circuit Rejects Constitutional Challenge to Copyright Laws in Kahle v. Gonzales." 1428: 1162: 1089: 979: 803: 702: 486: 421: 446: 279: 2013: 1687: 1444: 1136: 685: 378: 619:
The widow or widower of the author or the children or both, if the author is dead.
481:. The act eliminated the previous requirements under US law that a second term of 1914: 1815: 1703: 1556: 1436: 625:
If there is no immediate family or will, the next of kin may claim the copyright.
351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 1679: 697: 689: 654:
Many critics viewed the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992, which was backed by the
629:
A copyright proprietor or owner may claim renewal in only the following cases:
1074: 2057: 2018: 1080: 871: 719: 659: 642: 715: 500: 1338:
WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act
1185:
Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States
895: 1180:
Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States
454: 298: 743: 584: in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 405: 482: 559: 114: 989: 520: 927:"Bush Likely to OK Bill That Would Renew All Pre-1978 Copyrights." 386: 909:"C'right Renewal Act Is Law; Home-Taping Act Still Pending." 658:, as an attempt to prevent many songs from falling into the 940:"Appeals Court Rejects Challenge to "opt-out" Copyright." 748: 458: 1923:
Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc.
954:"Appeals court rejects challenge to "opt-out" copyright" 854:
Registration of Claims to Copyright-Renewals: Final Rule
782: 501:
Renewal system prior to and following the 1992 amendment
1712:
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.
1373:
Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act
1333:
Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act
1119: 922: 920: 718:
could be used to contribute to projects that utilized
679: 1736:
Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.
1664:
Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.
1501:
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
869: 1744:
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp.
1017:"U.S. court upholds copyright law on "orphan works"" 744:
Other Titles of the Copyright Amendments Act of 1992
1003:“U.S. Court upholds copyright law on “orphan works” 917: 829:"Titles - S.756 - Copyright Amendments Act of 1992" 139:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 1728:Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc. 438: 271: 2055: 1808:Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd. 521:Benefits of filing copyright renewal application 1672:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. 1573:American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. 549: 397:United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary 1931:Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc. 1768:Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int'l 1485:White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. 788:Title III of the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 649: 1148:Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices 1105: 1014: 863: 469:that amended copyright renewal provisions of 2069:United States federal copyright legislation 1848:Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha 1493:Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States 1265:Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 790:repealed the previous requirement that the 725:The district court dismissed the case. The 50:Learn how and when to remove these messages 1864:Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. 1720:American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc. 1112: 1098: 1045:"S.756 - Copyright Amendments Act of 1992" 1832:Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc. 736:, which had already been rejected by the 656:Recording Industry Association of America 636:Periodical, cyclopedic, or composite work 600:Learn how and when to remove this message 217:Learn how and when to remove this message 199:Learn how and when to remove this message 1565:Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 898:Stanford Center for Internet and Society 414:on June 4, 1992 (without objection) 76:: vague phrasing that often accompanies 1453:Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony 1322:Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998 1039: 1037: 2056: 1987:Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc. 1760:A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. 1656:Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates 1640:Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co. 1549:Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. 1356:Family Entertainment and Copyright Act 856:, U.S. Copyright Office, 72 Fed. Reg. 761:National Film Preservation Act of 1988 756:National Film Preservation Act of 1992 749:National Film Preservation Act of 1992 639:Work copyrighted by a corporate entity 1955:RealNetworks, Inc. v. Streambox, Inc. 1093: 951: 783:Title III: Other Copyright Provisions 1971:Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC 1947:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. 1824:Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. 1597:Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 1051:. Library of Congress. June 26, 1992 1034: 835:. Library of Congress. June 26, 1992 582:adding citations to reliable sources 553: 137:adding citations to reliable sources 108: 56: 15: 1979:Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. 1880:Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. 1752:Nunez v. Caribbean Int'l News Corp. 1613:Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith 1541:MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 1223:International Copyright Act of 1891 872:"Circular 15, Renewal of Copyright" 870:U.S. Copyright Office (July 2006). 680:Reaction against the 1992 amendment 13: 1939:Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Frena 1784:In re Aimster Copyright Litigation 1696:Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd. 1605:Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 1517:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 1287:Copyright Remedy Clarification Act 1121:Copyright law of the United States 1015:Auchard, Eric (January 22, 2007). 809:Copyright law of the United States 443:Tooltip Public Law (United States) 276:Tooltip Public Law (United States) 14: 2080: 1840:Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc. 1632:Berlin v. E.C. Publications, Inc. 1067: 31:This article has multiple issues. 1589:Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com 1581:Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands 1327:Digital Millennium Copyright Act 769:National Film Preservation Board 558: 463:Copyright Amendments Act of 1992 242: 113: 61: 20: 2029:Home Recording Rights Coalition 1008: 995: 952:Staff, Ars (January 25, 2007). 708:Northern District of California 569:needs additional citations for 148:"Copyright Renewal Act of 1992" 124:needs additional citations for 39:or discuss these issues on the 1142:United States Copyright Office 971: 945: 932: 901: 888: 847: 821: 727:Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 485:protection is contingent on a 1: 1888:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 1856:Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc. 1792:NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute 1293:Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 814: 684:In 2007, four plaintiffs—the 434:Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 237:Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 2064:102nd United States Congress 1995:Hachette v. Internet Archive 1963:Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co. 1316:Copyright Term Extension Act 1304:Uruguay Round Agreements Act 550:Eligibility to claim renewal 461:, is the first title of the 256:102nd United States Congress 7: 1477:Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus 797: 738:United States Supreme Court 650:Music industry implications 404:on November 25, 1991 ( 231:United States copyright law 10: 2085: 1776:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. 88:Such statements should be 2009: 1906: 1872:Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc 1623: 1418: 1409: 1388: 1365: 1348: 1281:Visual Artists Rights Act 1273: 1257: 1241: 1200: 1193: 1127: 366: 357: 327: 319: 309: 304: 285: 266: 261: 250: 241: 2042:You Wouldn't Steal a Car 1298:Audio Home Recording Act 1075:Full text available here 1379:Music Modernization Act 1310:No Electronic Theft Act 1173:Section 108 Study Group 929:Billboard 20 June 1992. 894:Sprigman, Christopher. 674:Little Bitty Pretty One 393:Committee consideration 328:U.S.C. sections amended 2024:Don't Copy That Floppy 1779:(9th Cir. 2002 / 2003) 1525:Quality King v. L'anza 1168:Register of Copyrights 1079:U.S. Copyright Office 1001:Auchard, Eric (2007). 907:Holland, Bill (1992). 792:Register of Copyrights 765:National Film Registry 467:United States Congress 1800:BMG Music v. Gonzalez 1648:Eltra Corp. v. Ringer 1249:Copyright Act of 1976 1233:Copyright Act of 1909 1218:Copyright Act of 1870 1213:Copyright Act of 1831 1208:Copyright Act of 1790 777:Librarian of Congress 763:and reauthorized the 616:The author, if living 495:Copyright Act of 1976 491:U.S. Copyright Office 479:Copyright Act of 1976 314:Copyright Act of 1976 1228:Printing Act of 1895 1083:Renewal of Copyright 986:487 F.3d 697 712:Million Book Project 578:improve this article 487:renewal registration 133:improve this article 90:clarified or removed 2035:Nimmer on Copyright 1918:(C.C.D. Mass. 1841) 1461:Banks v. Manchester 773:Library of Congress 389:) on March 21, 1991 360:Legislative history 238: 1533:Eldred v. Ashcroft 1469:Callaghan v. Myers 694:Prelinger Archives 643:Work made for hire 475:United States Code 236: 2051: 2050: 2005: 2004: 1958:(W.D. Wash. 2000) 1429:Wheaton v. Peters 1405: 1404: 1163:Copyright Catalog 980:Kahle v. Gonzales 938:Lee, Tim (2007). 804:Kahle v. Gonzales 703:Kahle v. Ashcroft 610: 609: 602: 493:. It amended the 431: 430: 422:George H. W. Bush 402:Passed the Senate 373:in the Senate as 288:Statutes at Large 227: 226: 219: 209: 208: 201: 183: 107: 106: 54: 2076: 2014:Berne Convention 1990:(C.D. Cal. 2015) 1942:(M.D. Fla. 1993) 1934:(N.D. Cal. 1986) 1896:Naruto v. Slater 1688:Whelan v. Jaslow 1445:Trade-Mark Cases 1416: 1415: 1198: 1197: 1137:Copyright Clause 1114: 1107: 1100: 1091: 1090: 1061: 1060: 1058: 1056: 1041: 1032: 1031: 1029: 1027: 1012: 1006: 999: 993: 983: 975: 969: 968: 966: 964: 949: 943: 936: 930: 924: 915: 905: 899: 892: 886: 885: 883: 881: 876: 867: 861: 851: 845: 844: 842: 840: 825: 700:—filed the case 696:and its founder 688:and its founder 686:Internet Archive 605: 598: 594: 591: 585: 562: 554: 527:copyright office 465:, an act of the 460: 444: 440: 424:on June 26, 1992 412:Passed the House 379:Dennis DeConcini 362: 289: 277: 273: 246: 239: 235: 222: 215: 204: 197: 193: 190: 184: 182: 141: 117: 109: 102: 99: 93: 65: 64: 57: 46: 24: 23: 16: 2084: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2047: 2001: 1998:(S.D.N.Y. 2023) 1982:(S.D.N.Y. 2013) 1974:(S.D.N.Y. 2010) 1966:(S.D.N.Y. 2005) 1950:(S.D.N.Y. 1999) 1926:(E.D.N.Y. 1973) 1915:Folsom v. Marsh 1902: 1899:(9th Cir. 2018) 1891:(9th Cir. 2015) 1875:(9th Cir. 2013) 1859:(9th Cir. 2012) 1843:(9th Cir. 2010) 1835:(2nd Cir. 2008) 1827:(9th Cir. 2006) 1819:(2nd Cir. 2006) 1816:Blanch v. Koons 1811:(2nd Cir. 2006) 1803:(7th Cir. 2005) 1787:(7th Cir. 2003) 1771:(5th Cir. 2002) 1763:(9th Cir. 2001) 1755:(1st Cir. 2000) 1747:(9th Cir. 2000) 1731:(9th Cir. 1997) 1723:(2nd Cir. 1995) 1707:(2nd Cir. 1992) 1704:Rogers v. Koons 1699:(5th Cir. 1988) 1683:(9th Cir. 1986) 1667:(7th Cir. 1983) 1659:(9th Cir. 1978) 1651:(4th Cir. 1978) 1643:(9th Cir. 1970) 1619: 1557:Golan v. Holder 1437:Baker v. Selden 1411: 1401: 1384: 1361: 1344: 1269: 1253: 1237: 1189: 1123: 1118: 1088: 1070: 1065: 1064: 1054: 1052: 1043: 1042: 1035: 1025: 1023: 1013: 1009: 1000: 996: 977: 976: 972: 962: 960: 950: 946: 937: 933: 925: 918: 906: 902: 893: 889: 879: 877: 874: 868: 864: 852: 848: 838: 836: 827: 826: 822: 817: 800: 785: 751: 746: 682: 652: 633:Posthumous work 606: 595: 589: 586: 575: 563: 552: 523: 503: 442: 427: 418:Signed into law 358: 323:17 (Copyrights) 287: 275: 251:Enacted by 232: 223: 212: 211: 210: 205: 194: 188: 185: 142: 140: 130: 118: 103: 97: 94: 87: 66: 62: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 2082: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2049: 2048: 2046: 2045: 2038: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2010: 2007: 2006: 2003: 2002: 2000: 1999: 1991: 1983: 1975: 1967: 1959: 1951: 1943: 1935: 1927: 1919: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1892: 1884: 1883:(2d Cir. 2015) 1876: 1868: 1867:(2d Cir. 2012) 1860: 1852: 1851:(2d Cir. 2011) 1844: 1836: 1828: 1820: 1812: 1804: 1796: 1795:(2d Cir. 2004) 1788: 1780: 1772: 1764: 1756: 1748: 1740: 1739:(2d Cir. 1998) 1732: 1724: 1716: 1715:(2d Cir. 1992) 1708: 1700: 1692: 1691:(3d Cir. 1986) 1684: 1680:Fisher v. Dees 1676: 1675:(3d Cir. 1983) 1668: 1660: 1652: 1644: 1636: 1635:(2d Cir. 1964) 1627: 1625: 1624:Appeals courts 1621: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1609: 1601: 1593: 1585: 1577: 1569: 1561: 1553: 1545: 1537: 1529: 1521: 1513: 1509:Feist v. Rural 1505: 1497: 1489: 1481: 1473: 1465: 1457: 1449: 1441: 1433: 1424: 1422: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1400: 1399: 1392: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1383: 1382: 1376: 1369: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1359: 1352: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1335: 1324: 1319: 1313: 1307: 1301: 1295: 1290: 1284: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1268: 1267: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1245: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1204: 1202: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1151: 1139: 1134: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1117: 1116: 1109: 1102: 1094: 1087: 1086: 1077: 1071: 1069: 1068:External links 1066: 1063: 1062: 1033: 1007: 994: 970: 944: 931: 916: 914:July 11, 1992. 900: 887: 862: 860:(Nov. 1, 2007) 846: 819: 818: 816: 813: 812: 811: 806: 799: 796: 784: 781: 750: 747: 745: 742: 698:Rick Prelinger 690:Brewster Kahle 681: 678: 651: 648: 647: 646: 640: 637: 634: 627: 626: 623: 620: 617: 608: 607: 566: 564: 557: 551: 548: 543: 542: 539: 536: 522: 519: 507:1909 copyright 502: 499: 477:enacted under 429: 428: 426: 425: 415: 409: 399: 390: 367: 364: 363: 355: 354: 332:17 U.S.C. 329: 325: 324: 321: 320:Titles amended 317: 316: 311: 307: 306: 302: 301: 291: 283: 282: 268: 264: 263: 259: 258: 252: 248: 247: 230: 225: 224: 207: 206: 121: 119: 112: 105: 104: 69: 67: 60: 55: 29: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2081: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2062: 2061: 2059: 2043: 2039: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2019:Uruguay Round 2017: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2008: 1997: 1996: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1965: 1964: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1952: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1911: 1909: 1905: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1423: 1421: 1420:Supreme Court 1417: 1414: 1408: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1391: 1387: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1351: 1347: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1244: 1240: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1203: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: â†’  1155: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1122: 1115: 1110: 1108: 1103: 1101: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1085: 1084: 1081:Circular 15, 1078: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1050: 1046: 1040: 1038: 1022: 1018: 1011: 1004: 998: 991: 987: 982: 981: 974: 959: 955: 948: 941: 935: 928: 923: 921: 913: 910: 904: 897: 891: 873: 866: 859: 855: 850: 834: 830: 824: 820: 810: 807: 805: 802: 801: 795: 793: 789: 780: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 757: 741: 739: 735: 733: 728: 723: 721: 720:public domain 717: 713: 709: 705: 704: 699: 695: 691: 687: 677: 675: 671: 670: 664: 661: 660:public domain 657: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 631: 630: 624: 621: 618: 615: 614: 613: 604: 601: 593: 590:December 2017 583: 579: 573: 572: 567:This section 565: 561: 556: 555: 547: 540: 537: 533: 532: 531: 528: 518: 514: 510: 508: 498: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 459:June 26, 1992 456: 452: 448: 441: 435: 423: 420:by President 419: 416: 413: 410: 407: 403: 400: 398: 394: 391: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 368: 365: 361: 356: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 312: 308: 303: 300: 296: 292: 290: 284: 281: 274: 269: 265: 260: 257: 253: 249: 245: 240: 234: 229: 221: 218: 203: 200: 192: 189:December 2017 181: 178: 174: 171: 167: 164: 160: 157: 153: 150: â€“  149: 145: 144:Find sources: 138: 134: 128: 127: 122:This article 120: 116: 111: 110: 101: 98:December 2017 91: 85: 83: 79: 75: 70:This article 68: 59: 58: 53: 51: 44: 43: 38: 37: 32: 27: 18: 17: 2033: 1993: 1985: 1977: 1969: 1961: 1953: 1945: 1937: 1929: 1921: 1913: 1907:Lower courts 1894: 1886: 1878: 1870: 1862: 1854: 1846: 1838: 1830: 1822: 1814: 1806: 1798: 1790: 1782: 1774: 1766: 1758: 1750: 1742: 1734: 1726: 1718: 1710: 1702: 1694: 1686: 1678: 1670: 1662: 1654: 1646: 1638: 1630: 1611: 1603: 1595: 1587: 1579: 1571: 1563: 1555: 1547: 1539: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1507: 1499: 1491: 1483: 1475: 1467: 1459: 1451: 1443: 1435: 1427: 1292: 1146: 1082: 1053:. Retrieved 1049:Congress.gov 1048: 1024:. Retrieved 1020: 1010: 997: 978: 973: 961:. Retrieved 958:Ars Technica 957: 947: 942:Ars Technica 934: 903: 890: 878:. Retrieved 865: 853: 849: 837:. Retrieved 833:Congress.gov 832: 823: 787: 786: 754: 752: 731: 724: 716:orphan works 701: 683: 667: 665: 653: 628: 611: 596: 587: 576:Please help 571:verification 568: 544: 524: 515: 511: 504: 462: 433: 432: 417: 411: 401: 392: 370: 310:Acts amended 305:Codification 233: 228: 213: 195: 186: 176: 169: 162: 155: 143: 131:Please help 126:verification 123: 95: 82:unverifiable 74:weasel words 71: 47: 40: 34: 33:Please help 30: 1412:and rulings 1055:December 4, 992: 2007). 858:61801-61806 839:December 4, 449:, 106  375:S. 756 84:information 2058:Categories 1410:Precedents 815:References 505:Under the 457:, enacted 406:voice vote 371:Introduced 352:§ 409 348:§ 408 344:§ 304 340:§ 108 336:§ 101 267:Public law 159:newspapers 36:improve it 1132:17 U.S.C. 1026:August 5, 963:August 5, 912:Billboard 669:Billboard 489:with the 483:copyright 293:106  262:Citations 72:contains 42:talk page 1396:CASE Act 1201:Pre-1976 1194:Statutes 990:9th Cir. 880:June 11, 798:See also 767:and the 471:Title 17 1329:(1998) 1021:Reuters 1005:Reuters 771:of the 706:in the 473:of the 447:102–307 439:Pub. L. 280:102–307 272:Pub. L. 173:scholar 1616:(2023) 1608:(2021) 1600:(2020) 1592:(2019) 1584:(2017) 1576:(2014) 1568:(2013) 1560:(2012) 1552:(2010) 1544:(2005) 1536:(2003) 1528:(1998) 1520:(1994) 1512:(1991) 1504:(1984) 1496:(1975) 1488:(1908) 1480:(1908) 1472:(1888) 1464:(1888) 1456:(1884) 1448:(1879) 1440:(1879) 1432:(1834) 1398:(2020) 1381:(2018) 1375:(2014) 1358:(2005) 1318:(1998) 1312:(1994) 1306:(1994) 1300:(1992) 1289:(1990) 1283:(1990) 988: ( 984:, 732:Eldred 692:, and 453:  445:  334:  297:  278:  175:  168:  161:  154:  146:  78:biased 1389:2020s 1366:2010s 1349:2000s 1274:1990s 1258:1980s 1242:1970s 875:(PDF) 535:year. 451:Stat. 295:Stat. 180:JSTOR 166:books 1154:CARP 1057:2017 1028:2017 965:2017 882:2018 841:2017 753:The 734:case 525:The 254:the 152:news 1158:CRB 580:by 455:264 395:by 377:by 299:264 135:by 80:or 2060:: 1047:. 1036:^ 1019:. 956:. 919:^ 831:. 779:. 740:. 666:A 497:. 436:, 387:AZ 350:, 346:, 342:, 338:, 45:. 2044:" 2040:" 1113:e 1106:t 1099:v 1059:. 1030:. 967:. 884:. 843:. 645:. 603:) 597:( 592:) 588:( 574:. 408:) 385:- 383:D 381:( 220:) 214:( 202:) 196:( 191:) 187:( 177:· 170:· 163:· 156:· 129:. 100:) 96:( 92:. 86:. 52:) 48:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
weasel words
biased
unverifiable
clarified or removed

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Copyright Renewal Act of 1992"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Learn how and when to remove this message
Great Seal of the United States
102nd United States Congress
Pub. L.
102–307
Statutes at Large
Stat.
264
Copyright Act of 1976
17 U.S.C.
§ 101
§ 108

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑