Knowledge

Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph

Source 📝

337: 913:
needles in pairs and always in opposite directions since there was no common wire provided. Many more codes are theoretically possible with common return signalling, but not all of them can conveniently be used with a grid indication display. The numerals were worked in by marking them around the edge of the diamond grid. Needles 1 through 5 when energised to the right pointed to numerals 1 through 5 respectively, and to the left numerals 6 through 9 and 0 respectively. Two additional buttons were provided on the telegraph sets to enable the common return to be connected to either the positive or negative terminal of the battery according to the direction it was desired to move the needle.
22: 182:. Indeed, this was the first commercial telegraph in the world. This was a five-needle, six-wire system. The cables were originally installed underground in a steel conduit. However, the cables soon began to fail as a result of deteriorating insulation. As an interim measure, a two-needle system was used with three of the remaining working underground wires, which despite using only two needles had a greater number of codes. Since the new code had to be learned, not just read off the display, this was the first time in telegraph history that skilled telegraph operators were required. 186:
and which rapidly became the most common method. This extension was done at Cooke's own expense, as the railway company was unwilling to finance a system it still considered experimental. Up to this point, the Great Western had insisted on exclusive use and refused Cooke permission to open public telegraph offices. Cooke's new agreement gave the railway free use of the system in exchange for Cooke's right to open public offices, establishing a public telegraph service for the first time. A flat rate was charged (unlike all later telegraph services which charged per word) of one
123: 163: 91:. Their collaboration was not a happy one because their objectives differed. Cooke was an inventor and entrepreneur who wished to patent and commercially exploit his inventions. Wheatstone, on the other hand, was an academic with no interest in commercial ventures, and he intended to publish his results and allow others to freely make use of them. This difference in outlook eventually led to a bitter dispute between the two men over claims to priority for the invention. Their differences were taken to arbitration with 866: 955: 949: 895:
represent each letter), the one-needle system used a four-unit code but had enough codes to encode the entire alphabet. Like the preceding two-needle system, the code units consisted of rapid deflections of the needle to either left or right in quick succession. The needle struck a post when it moved, causing it to ring. Different tones were provided for the left and right movements so that the operator could hear the needle's direction without looking at it.
72: 1030: 1024: 937: 931: 159:. It was successfully demonstrated on 25 July 1837. This was a similar application to the Liverpool project. The carriages were detached at Camden Town and travelled under gravity into Euston. A system was needed to signal to an engine house at Camden Town to start hauling the carriages back up the incline to the waiting locomotive. As at Liverpool, the electric telegraph was in the end rejected in favour of a pneumatic system with whistles. 1000:
right (that is, from M onwards) should be read right-to-left, not left-to-right (but still observing short stroke first). Shaffner, who was alive when this telegraph was still in operation and observed it in use in England, is the source (page 221) for the principle of executing the short stroke first. Guillemin does not state the principle explicitly, but it can be inferred since he gives another code in both tick-mark glyphs and numbers.
904: 1018: 1012: 943: 925: 919: 275:
after receiving K-W-A which he assumed was a mistake. This continued until a small boy suggested the sending operator be allowed to complete the word, after which it was understood. After arriving, Tawell was followed to a nearby coffee shop by a detective and arrested there. Newspaper coverage of this incident gave a great deal of publicity to the electric telegraph and brought it firmly into public view.
246: 841:
wires and thence to one end of the coils at the receiving station. The other ends of the receiving coils, while in receive mode, were all commoned together. Thus the current flowed through the same two coils at both ends and energised the same two needles. With this system the needles were always energised in pairs and always rotated in opposite directions.
197:(another rope-hauled application) was equipped with the Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph when it opened in 1840, and many others followed. The distance involved on the Blackwall Railway (four miles) was too far for steam signalling and the engineer, Robert Stephenson, strongly supported the electric solution. In February 1845, an 88-mile line from 139:
a few simple signals such as an indication to the engine house to start hauling. Cooke was requested to build a simpler version with fewer codes, which he did by the end of April 1837. However, the railway decided to use instead a pneumatic telegraph equipped with whistles. Soon after this Cooke went into partnership with Wheatstone.
52:, and the first telegraph system to be put into commercial service. The receiver consisted of a number of needles that could be moved by electromagnetic coils to point to letters on a board. This feature was liked by early users who were unwilling to learn codes, and employers who did not want to invest in staff training. 63:. Once it was known that Tawell had boarded a train to London, the telegraph was used to signal ahead to the terminus at Paddington and have him arrested there. The novelty of this use of the telegraph in crime-fighting generated a great deal of publicity and led to increased public acceptance and use of the telegraph. 56:
which was related to the number of needles. The change became more urgent as the insulation of some of the early installations deteriorated, causing some of the original wires to be unusable. Cooke and Wheatstone's most successful system was eventually a one-needle system that continued in service into the 1930s.
840:
At the sending end there were two rows of buttons, a pair of buttons for each coil in each row. The operator selected one button from each row. This connected two of the coils to the positive and negative ends of the battery respectively. The other ends of the coils were connected to the telegraph
274:
The Cooke and Wheatstone system did not support punctuation, lower case, or some letters. Even the two-needle system omitted the letters J, Q, and Z; hence the misspellings of 'just' and 'Quaker'. This caused some difficulty for the receiving operator at Paddington who repeatedly requested a resend
236:
The Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph was largely confined to the United Kingdom and the British Empire. However, it was also used in Spain for a time. After nationalisation of the telegraph sector in the UK, the Post Office slowly replaced the diverse systems it had inherited, including the Cooke and
185:
When the line was extended to Slough in 1843, a one-needle, two-wire system was installed. Cooke also changed from running the cables in buried lead pipes to the less expensive and easier to maintain system of suspending uninsulated wires on poles from ceramic insulators, a system which he patented,
142:
In May 1837 Cooke and Wheatstone patented a telegraph system that used a number of needles on a board that could be moved to point to letters of the alphabet. The patent recommended a five-needle system, but any number of needles could be used depending on the number of characters it was required to
138:
and a rope-haulage engine house at the top of a steep incline through a long tunnel outside the station. Rope-haulage into main stations was common at this time to avoid noise and pollution, and in this case the gradient was too steep for the locomotive to ascend unaided. All that was required were
55:
In later systems, the letter board was dispensed with, and the code was read directly from the movement of the needles. This occurred because the number of needles was reduced, leading to more complex codes. The change was motivated by the economic need to reduce the number of telegraph wires used,
849:
The five-needle telegraph with twenty possible needle positions was six codes short of being able to encode the complete alphabet. The letters omitted were C, J, Q, U, X and Z. A great selling point of this telegraph was that it was simple to use and required little operator training. There is no
356:
The number of wires required by the Cooke and Wheatstone system is equal to the number of needles used. Cooke and Wheatstone's patent recommends five needles, and this was the number on their early demonstration models. The number of symbols that can be obtained using a code similar to the one the
269:
A MURDER HAS GUST BEEN COMMITTED AT SALT HILL AND THE SUSPECTED MURDERER WAS SEEN TO TAKE A FIRST CLASS TICKET TO LONDON BY THE TRAIN WHICH LEFT SLOUGH AT 742 PM HE IS IN THE GARB OF A KWAKER WITH A GREAT COAT ON WHICH REACHES NEARLY DOWN TO HIS FEET HE IS IN THE LAST COMPARTMENT OF THE SECOND CLASS
999:
Huurdeman (page 68) reads the glyph strokes in strict left-to-right order regardless of stroke length. This cannot be correct since it leads to ambiguous codes—for instance E and U would be identically left-left-right. Also, the mirror symmetry of the glyph markings suggests that the codes on the
907:
Original codes for the one-, two-, and five-needle telegraphs. A stroke leaning to the left indicates a needle rotated anti-clockwise, that is, with the top pointing to the left. A stroke leaning to the right indicates a needle pointing to the right. For multiple stroke codes, the first movement
352:
from an energising winding. The direction of movement was determined by the direction of the current in the telegraph wires. The board was marked with a diamond shaped grid with a letter at each grid intersection, and so arranged that when two needles were energised they would point to a specific
912:
The codes were refined and adapted as they were used. By 1867 numerals had been added to the five-needle code. This was achieved through the provision of a sixth wire for common return making it possible to move just a single needle. With the original five wires it was only possible to move the
894:
This system was developed to replace the failing multi-wire telegraph on the Paddington to West Drayton line. It required only two wires but a more complex code and slower transmission speed. Whereas the two-needle system needed a three-unit code (that is, up to three movements of the needles to
881:
The two-needle telegraph required three wires, one for each needle and a common return. The coding was somewhat different from the five-needle telegraph and needed to be learned, rather than read from a display. The needles could move to the left or right either one, two, or three times in quick
861:
available, but using arbitrary codes would have required more extensive operator training since the display could not be read on sight from the grid as the simple alphabetic codes were. Because of this, the additional functionality was only used to add numerals by pointing a needle to the numeral
882:
succession, or a single time in both directions in quick succession. Either needle, or both together, could be moved. This gave a total of 24 codes, one of which was taken up by the stop code. Thus, three letters were omitted: J, Q and Z, which were substituted with G, K and S respectively.
989:
Shaffner (page 221) has the 1-needle codes for K and L swapped to those shown in the table. This appears to be an error. Both Huurdeman (page 68) and Guillemin (page 551) give these codes as per table, as do examples of surviving instruments. Also, the glyphs are marked on the face of the
885:
Originally, the telegraph was fitted with a bell that rang when another operator wanted attention. This proved so annoying that it was removed. It was found that the clicking of the needle against its endstop was sufficient to draw attention.
278:
The widely publicised arrest of Tawell was one of two events which brought the telegraph to greater public attention and led to its widespread use beyond railway signalling. The other event was the announcement by telegraph of the birth of
862:
required marked around the edge of the board. The economic need to reduce the number of wires in the end proved a stronger incentive than simplicity of use and led Cooke and Wheatstone to develop the two-needle and one-needle telegraphs.
303:
is a train safety system that divides the track into blocks and uses signals to prevent another train entering a block until a train already in the block has left. The system was proposed by Cooke in 1842 in
324:. Instruments specific to block working were installed in 1841. Block working became the norm and remains so to the present day, except that modern technology has allowed fixed blocks to be replaced with 974:
where the two characters are run together without a character gap. The two-needle number shift and letter shift codes are also compounds, which is the reason they have been written with an overbar.
1117: 233:. The one-needle telegraph proved highly successful on British railways, and 15,000 sets were still in use at the end of the nineteenth century. Some remained in service in the 1930s. 312:. Previously, separation of trains had relied on strict timetabling only, which was unable to allow for unforeseen events. The first use of block working was probably in 1839 when 1672: 425: 229:. This company bought out the Cooke and Wheatstone patents and solidly established the telegraph business. In 1869 the company was nationalised and became part of the 833: 812: 789: 745: 701: 657: 613: 569: 853:
At some point, the ability to move a single needle independently was added. This required an additional conductor for a common return, possibly by means of an
768: 724: 680: 636: 592: 548: 525: 504: 481: 460: 375: 348:
The Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph consisted of a number of magnetic needles which could be made to turn a short distance either clockwise or anti-clockwise by
134:
a design for a 60-code mechanical telegraph. This was too complicated for their purposes; the immediate need was for a simple signal communication between the
1021:
should be read. He says that "each of these letters are composed of two deflections each way" (pages 221–222), which suggests that they are equivalent to
114:. However, much of the scientific knowledge for the model actually put into practice came from Wheatstone. Cooke's earlier ideas were largely abandoned. 908:
is in the direction of the short stroke. For example, in the one-needle code, E is left-right-left, L is right-left-right-left, and U is left-left-right.
990:
instrument with those on the right being the mirror image of the corresponding glyph on the left. Shaffner's arrangement breaks this mirror symmetry.
1114: 336: 1316: 280: 213:
paid half the capital cost and £1,500 per annum for a private two-needle telegraph on this line to connect it to its base in
135: 193:
From this point on, the use of the electric telegraph started to grow on the new railways being built from London. The
102:
Cooke had had some ideas for building a telegraph prior to his partnership with Wheatstone and had consulted scientist
1580: 206: 131: 1642: 1612: 1550: 1535: 1520: 1505: 265:
on 1 January 1845. This is thought to be the first use of the telegraph to catch a murderer. The message was:
21: 156: 194: 850:
code to learn, as the letter being sent was visibly displayed to both the sending and receiving operator.
1649: 226: 946:) are marked on the plates of later needle telegraphs, together with six-unit codes for number shift ( 349: 99:
acting for Wheatstone. Cooke eventually bought out Wheatstone's interest in exchange for royalties.
80: 41: 170:
Cooke and Wheatstone had their first commercial success with a telegraph installed in 1838 on the
380: 300: 1587: 357:
five needle system used depends on the number of needles available; generalizing, with a number
854: 144: 321: 171: 96: 26: 92: 37: 122: 110:
system and a mechanical telegraph involving a clockwork mechanism with an electromagnetic
8: 1667: 1472: 309: 230: 928:) were added to the one-needle code, but not, apparently, for J. However, codes for Q ( 818: 797: 774: 730: 686: 642: 598: 554: 858: 753: 709: 665: 621: 577: 533: 510: 489: 466: 445: 360: 222: 175: 162: 84: 45: 1638: 1623: 1608: 1593: 1576: 1561: 1546: 1531: 1516: 1501: 1386: 1312: 317: 313: 218: 210: 152: 88: 1378: 59:
Cooke and Wheatstone's telegraph played a part in the apprehension of the murderer
49: 1121: 214: 103: 284: 1661: 1390: 1597: 1124:
BT Group Connected Earth Online Museum. Accessed December 2010, 10 Feb 2013
325: 179: 107: 1627: 1565: 1475:, Musée des Arts et Métiers, Paris, stkone, Flickr, retrieved 16 Feb 2013. 954: 948: 865: 254: 148: 60: 869:
Circuit diagram of the five-needle telegraph transmitting the character
971: 262: 71: 958:). Numerous compound codes were added for operator controls such as 257:
was apprehended following the use of a needle telegraph message from
198: 187: 1382: 1029: 1023: 936: 930: 967: 291:
at the unprecedented speed of 40 minutes after the announcement.
202: 1543:
Communications: An International History of the Formative Years
1017: 1011: 942: 924: 918: 258: 190:, but many people paid this just to see the strange equipment. 111: 903: 245: 166:
Cooke and Wheatstone 5-wire telegraph cable in a wooden spacer
106:
for expert advice. In 1836, Cooke built both an experimental
1009:
Shaffner does not give a clear explanation of how the glyphs
1366: 25:
Cooke and Wheatstone's two-needle telegraph as used on the
40:
system dating from the 1830s invented by English inventor
1275: 1273: 130:
In January 1837, Cooke proposed to the directors of the
1313:"John Tawell, The Man Hanged by the Electric Telegraph" 237:
Wheatstone telegraph, with the Morse telegraph system.
209:, far longer than any other line up to that time. The 16:
Early electrical telegraph system dating from the 1830s
316:
had a Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph installed in the
126:
Cooke and Wheatstone's five-needle, six-wire telegraph
1620:
The Electric Telegraph: A Social and Economic History
1270: 821: 800: 777: 756: 733: 712: 689: 668: 645: 624: 601: 580: 557: 536: 513: 492: 469: 448: 383: 363: 1673:
History of telecommunications in the United Kingdom
827: 806: 783: 762: 739: 718: 695: 674: 651: 630: 607: 586: 563: 542: 519: 498: 475: 454: 419: 369: 143:code. A four-needle system was installed between 87:, best known to schoolchildren from the eponymous 79:The telegraph arose from a collaboration between 1659: 1490: 151:in London on a rail line being constructed by 1635:The Telephone: The Life Story of a Technology 1134: 1132: 1130: 1605:The Worldwide History of Telecommunications 1173: 1171: 340:Five-needle telegraph receiving the letter 1528:Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey 1473:"Single needle telegraph - Zeigertelegraf" 1307: 1305: 1303: 1127: 1560:, Simpkin, Marshall & Company, 1842 1168: 902: 864: 844: 335: 294: 244: 161: 121: 70: 20: 1371:The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 1300: 1033:respectively, and not a different code. 889: 876: 1660: 1558:Telegraphic Railways or the Single Way 1451:Huurdeman, page 68 (one-needle, early) 1364: 1315:. University of Salford. 10 Feb 2013. 966:. These compounds are similar to the 306:Telegraphic Railways or the Single Way 1448:Shaffner, page 221 (one-needle, late) 1530:, University of Chicago Press, 2010 1526:Bowler, Peter J.; Morus, Iwan Rhys, 1445:Shaffner, pages 226–229 (two-needle) 1442:Shaffner, page 204–205 (five-needle) 977: 377:of needles it is possible to encode 221:. In September 1845, the financier 174:over the 13 miles (21 km) from 1637:, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006 1589:The Applications of Physical Forces 857:. This dramatically increased the 75:Wheatstone (left) and Cooke (right) 13: 14: 1684: 1513:Sir Charles Wheatstone: 1802–1875 1060:Bowler & Morus, pages 403–404 1319:from the original on 13 May 2013 1028: 1022: 1016: 1010: 953: 947: 941: 935: 929: 923: 917: 240: 207:London and South Western Railway 132:Liverpool and Manchester Railway 1478: 1466: 1457: 1433: 1424: 1415: 1406: 1397: 1365:Sloane, N. J. A. (1994-04-13). 1358: 1349: 1340: 1331: 1291: 1282: 1261: 1252: 1243: 1234: 1225: 1216: 1207: 1198: 1189: 1180: 1150: 1141: 1003: 993: 983: 1648:Shaffner, Taliaferro Preston, 1607:, John Wiley & Sons, 2003 1592:, Macmillan and Company, 1877 1108: 1099: 1090: 1081: 1072: 1063: 1054: 1045: 414: 402: 393: 387: 34:Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph 1: 1654:, Pudney & Russell, 1859. 308:as a safer way of working on 287:. The news was published in 1573:Electric Railways: 1880-1990 1491:General and cited references 1039: 331: 195:London and Blackwall Railway 66: 7: 916:Also by 1867, codes for Q ( 420:{\displaystyle f(x)=x(x-1)} 10: 1689: 1622:, David and Charles, 1973 227:Electric Telegraph Company 117: 1115:The telegraphic age dawns 350:electromagnetic induction 328:on the busiest railways. 1367:""Sequence A002378 OEIS" 898: 249:John Tawell at his trial 217:, finally replacing the 205:was completed along the 81:William Fothergill Cooke 42:William Fothergill Cooke 1463:Shaffner, pages 204–206 1421:Shaffner, pages 204–207 301:signalling block system 1279:Huurdeman, pages 67–69 1159:Huurdeman, pages 67–68 909: 873: 829: 808: 785: 764: 741: 720: 697: 676: 653: 632: 609: 588: 565: 544: 521: 500: 477: 456: 421: 371: 345: 272: 250: 167: 127: 76: 44:and English scientist 29: 1603:Huurdeman, Anton A., 1498:History of Telegraphy 1105:Bowers, pages 124–125 906: 868: 845:Five-needle telegraph 830: 809: 786: 765: 742: 721: 698: 677: 654: 633: 610: 589: 566: 545: 522: 501: 478: 457: 422: 372: 339: 322:North Midland Railway 295:Railway block working 267: 248: 225:and Cooke formed the 172:Great Western Railway 165: 157:London and Birmingham 125: 97:John Frederic Daniell 95:acting for Cooke and 74: 27:Great Western Railway 24: 1651:The Telegraph Manual 952:) and letter shift ( 890:One-needle telegraph 877:Two-needle telegraph 819: 798: 775: 754: 731: 710: 687: 666: 643: 622: 599: 578: 555: 534: 511: 490: 467: 446: 381: 361: 281:Alfred Ernest Albert 93:Marc Isambard Brunel 48:. It was a form of 38:electrical telegraph 1618:Kieve, Jeffrey L., 1586:Guillemin, Amédée, 1571:Duffy, Michael C., 1556:Cooke, William F., 431: 231:General Post Office 1541:Burns, Russel W., 1484:Shaffner, page 221 1412:Shaffner, page 201 1403:Burns, pages 75–77 1346:Kieve, pages 33-34 1337:Burns, pages 78–79 1258:Kieve, pages 37–38 1240:Beauchamp, page 35 1222:Kieve, pages 31-32 1195:Huurdeman, page 69 1186:Kieve, pages 32-33 1162:Beauchamp, page 35 1147:Huurdeman, page 67 1120:2013-02-19 at the 1069:Shaffner, page 185 910: 874: 828:{\displaystyle 90} 825: 807:{\displaystyle 10} 804: 784:{\displaystyle 72} 781: 760: 740:{\displaystyle 56} 737: 716: 696:{\displaystyle 42} 693: 672: 652:{\displaystyle 30} 649: 628: 608:{\displaystyle 20} 605: 584: 564:{\displaystyle 12} 561: 540: 517: 496: 473: 452: 435:Number of needles 430: 417: 367: 346: 251: 223:John Lewis Ricardo 176:Paddington station 168: 128: 85:Charles Wheatstone 77: 46:Charles Wheatstone 30: 1288:Huurdeman, p. 107 1249:Kieve pages 30-31 1078:Schaffner, p. 190 978:Explanatory notes 838: 837: 763:{\displaystyle 9} 719:{\displaystyle 8} 675:{\displaystyle 7} 631:{\displaystyle 6} 587:{\displaystyle 5} 543:{\displaystyle 4} 520:{\displaystyle 6} 499:{\displaystyle 3} 476:{\displaystyle 2} 455:{\displaystyle 2} 438:Possible symbols 370:{\displaystyle x} 318:Clay Cross Tunnel 314:George Stephenson 219:optical telegraph 153:Robert Stephenson 136:Liverpool station 89:Wheatstone bridge 1680: 1496:Beauchamp, Ken, 1485: 1482: 1476: 1470: 1464: 1461: 1455: 1437: 1431: 1428: 1422: 1419: 1413: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1395: 1394: 1362: 1356: 1353: 1347: 1344: 1338: 1335: 1329: 1328: 1326: 1324: 1309: 1298: 1295: 1289: 1286: 1280: 1277: 1268: 1265: 1259: 1256: 1250: 1247: 1241: 1238: 1232: 1229: 1223: 1220: 1214: 1211: 1205: 1202: 1196: 1193: 1187: 1184: 1178: 1175: 1166: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1139: 1138:Bowers, page 129 1136: 1125: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1097: 1094: 1088: 1087:Bowers, page 123 1085: 1079: 1076: 1070: 1067: 1061: 1058: 1052: 1051:Bowers, page 119 1049: 1034: 1032: 1026: 1020: 1014: 1007: 1001: 997: 991: 987: 957: 951: 945: 939: 933: 927: 921: 834: 832: 831: 826: 813: 811: 810: 805: 790: 788: 787: 782: 769: 767: 766: 761: 746: 744: 743: 738: 725: 723: 722: 717: 702: 700: 699: 694: 681: 679: 678: 673: 658: 656: 655: 650: 637: 635: 634: 629: 614: 612: 611: 606: 593: 591: 590: 585: 570: 568: 567: 562: 549: 547: 546: 541: 526: 524: 523: 518: 505: 503: 502: 497: 482: 480: 479: 474: 461: 459: 458: 453: 432: 429: 426: 424: 423: 418: 376: 374: 373: 368: 283:, second son of 50:needle telegraph 1688: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1658: 1657: 1633:Mercer, David, 1511:Bowers, Brian, 1493: 1488: 1483: 1479: 1471: 1467: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1407: 1402: 1398: 1363: 1359: 1355:Duffy, page 378 1354: 1350: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1332: 1322: 1320: 1311: 1310: 1301: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1235: 1230: 1226: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1194: 1190: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1169: 1165: 1155: 1151: 1146: 1142: 1137: 1128: 1122:Wayback Machine 1113: 1109: 1104: 1100: 1095: 1091: 1086: 1082: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1037: 1008: 1004: 998: 994: 988: 984: 980: 901: 892: 879: 847: 820: 817: 816: 799: 796: 795: 776: 773: 772: 755: 752: 751: 732: 729: 728: 711: 708: 707: 688: 685: 684: 667: 664: 663: 644: 641: 640: 623: 620: 619: 600: 597: 596: 579: 576: 575: 556: 553: 552: 535: 532: 531: 512: 509: 508: 491: 488: 487: 468: 465: 464: 447: 444: 443: 382: 379: 378: 362: 359: 358: 334: 297: 253:Murder suspect 243: 120: 104:Michael Faraday 69: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1686: 1676: 1675: 1670: 1656: 1655: 1646: 1631: 1616: 1601: 1584: 1569: 1554: 1539: 1524: 1509: 1492: 1489: 1487: 1486: 1477: 1465: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1432: 1430:Kieve, page 81 1423: 1414: 1405: 1396: 1357: 1348: 1339: 1330: 1299: 1290: 1281: 1269: 1267:Mercer, page 8 1260: 1251: 1242: 1233: 1231:Kieve, page 33 1224: 1215: 1206: 1204:Kieve, page 32 1197: 1188: 1179: 1177:Mercer, page 7 1167: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1149: 1140: 1126: 1107: 1098: 1096:Burns, page 72 1089: 1080: 1071: 1062: 1053: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1002: 992: 981: 979: 976: 900: 897: 891: 888: 878: 875: 846: 843: 836: 835: 824: 814: 803: 792: 791: 780: 770: 759: 748: 747: 736: 726: 715: 704: 703: 692: 682: 671: 660: 659: 648: 638: 627: 616: 615: 604: 594: 583: 572: 571: 560: 550: 539: 528: 527: 516: 506: 495: 484: 483: 472: 462: 451: 440: 439: 436: 416: 413: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 366: 333: 330: 296: 293: 285:Queen Victoria 242: 239: 119: 116: 68: 65: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1685: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1663: 1653: 1652: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1582: 1581:9780852968055 1578: 1575:, IEE, 2003, 1574: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1481: 1474: 1469: 1460: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1427: 1418: 1409: 1400: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383:10.37236/1194 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1361: 1352: 1343: 1334: 1318: 1314: 1308: 1306: 1304: 1297:Kieve, p. 176 1294: 1285: 1276: 1274: 1264: 1255: 1246: 1237: 1228: 1219: 1213:Duffy, page 5 1210: 1201: 1192: 1183: 1174: 1172: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1144: 1135: 1133: 1131: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1111: 1102: 1093: 1084: 1075: 1066: 1057: 1048: 1044: 1031: 1025: 1019: 1013: 1006: 996: 986: 982: 975: 973: 969: 965: 961: 956: 950: 944: 938: 932: 926: 920: 914: 905: 896: 887: 883: 872: 867: 863: 860: 856: 851: 842: 822: 815: 801: 794: 793: 778: 771: 757: 750: 749: 734: 727: 713: 706: 705: 690: 683: 669: 662: 661: 646: 639: 625: 618: 617: 602: 595: 581: 574: 573: 558: 551: 537: 530: 529: 514: 507: 493: 486: 485: 470: 463: 449: 442: 441: 437: 434: 433: 428: 427:symbols. So: 411: 408: 405: 399: 396: 390: 384: 364: 354: 351: 343: 338: 329: 327: 326:moving blocks 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 302: 292: 290: 286: 282: 276: 271: 266: 264: 260: 256: 247: 241:Tawell arrest 238: 234: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 191: 189: 183: 181: 177: 173: 164: 160: 158: 154: 150: 146: 140: 137: 133: 124: 115: 113: 109: 105: 100: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 73: 64: 62: 57: 53: 51: 47: 43: 39: 36:was an early 35: 28: 23: 19: 1650: 1634: 1619: 1604: 1588: 1572: 1557: 1545:, IEE, 2004 1542: 1527: 1515:, IET, 2001 1512: 1500:, IET, 2001 1497: 1480: 1468: 1459: 1435: 1426: 1417: 1408: 1399: 1374: 1370: 1360: 1351: 1342: 1333: 1321:. Retrieved 1293: 1284: 1263: 1254: 1245: 1236: 1227: 1218: 1209: 1200: 1191: 1182: 1152: 1143: 1110: 1101: 1092: 1083: 1074: 1065: 1056: 1047: 1005: 995: 985: 963: 959: 915: 911: 893: 884: 880: 870: 855:earth return 852: 848: 839: 355: 347: 341: 310:single lines 305: 298: 288: 277: 273: 268: 252: 235: 192: 184: 180:West Drayton 169: 141: 129: 108:electrometer 101: 78: 58: 54: 33: 31: 18: 270:COMPARTMENT 255:John Tawell 149:Camden Town 61:John Tawell 1668:Telegraphy 1662:Categories 1643:031333207X 1613:0471205052 1598:5894380237 1551:0863413277 1536:0226068625 1521:0852961030 1506:0852967926 1323:11 January 972:Morse code 940:), and J ( 263:Paddington 215:Portsmouth 1628:655205099 1566:213732219 1391:1077-8926 1040:Citations 970:found in 922:) and Z ( 859:codespace 409:− 332:Operation 289:The Times 211:Admiralty 199:Nine Elms 67:Inventors 1317:Archived 1118:Archived 968:prosigns 353:letter. 188:shilling 155:between 320:of the 203:Gosport 118:History 1641:  1626:  1611:  1596:  1579:  1564:  1549:  1534:  1519:  1504:  1389:  964:repeat 934:), Z ( 259:Slough 145:Euston 112:detent 1377:(1). 899:Codes 1639:ISBN 1624:OCLC 1609:ISBN 1594:OCLC 1577:ISBN 1562:OCLC 1547:ISBN 1532:ISBN 1517:ISBN 1502:ISBN 1387:ISSN 1325:2009 1027:and 1015:and 962:and 960:wait 299:The 147:and 83:and 32:The 1379:doi 261:to 201:to 178:to 1664:: 1385:. 1373:. 1369:. 1302:^ 1272:^ 1170:^ 1129:^ 823:90 802:10 779:72 735:56 691:42 647:30 603:20 559:12 1645:. 1630:. 1615:. 1600:. 1583:. 1568:. 1553:. 1538:. 1523:. 1508:. 1393:. 1381:: 1375:1 1327:. 871:A 758:9 714:8 670:7 626:6 582:5 538:4 515:6 494:3 471:2 450:2 415:) 412:1 406:x 403:( 400:x 397:= 394:) 391:x 388:( 385:f 365:x 344:. 342:G

Index


Great Western Railway
electrical telegraph
William Fothergill Cooke
Charles Wheatstone
needle telegraph
John Tawell

William Fothergill Cooke
Charles Wheatstone
Wheatstone bridge
Marc Isambard Brunel
John Frederic Daniell
Michael Faraday
electrometer
detent

Liverpool and Manchester Railway
Liverpool station
Euston
Camden Town
Robert Stephenson
London and Birmingham

Great Western Railway
Paddington station
West Drayton
shilling
London and Blackwall Railway
Nine Elms

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.