Knowledge

Commission v United Kingdom (C-484/04)

Source 📝

112:
The European Court of Justice held that the UK government's guidance advocated a breach of the Directive, article 4. There is a duty to guarantee that the right to rest is in fact observed. It also declared the 1999 amendment to be contrary to art 17, though the UK government had already backtracked
103:
that ‘Employers must make sure that workers can take their rest, but are not required to make sure that they do take their rest.’ Also, Statutory Instrument 1999/3372 had amended regulation 20 to exempt workers whose work was but partly unmeasured, so working time and night work control applied only
182: 367: 375: 704: 328: 313: 432: 96: 714: 709: 242: 699: 462: 662: 142: 679: 437: 345: 212: 586: 543: 259: 409: 197: 68: 41: 616: 476: 274: 486: 471: 167: 100: 84: 289: 279: 264: 249: 232: 217: 202: 187: 467: 300: 646: 481: 418: 626: 539: 135: 591: 447: 361: 227: 80: 54: 719: 570: 566: 548: 171: 552: 520: 402: 158: 8: 667: 128: 72: 621: 601: 561: 525: 516: 507: 334: 303: 534: 379:
IRLR 102, Peter Gibson LJ, a rest break must be fixed in advance of its commencement
606: 557: 529: 511: 319: 631: 491: 395: 693: 596: 356: 76: 387: 641: 611: 120: 442: 636: 457: 452: 330:
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009
95:The UK Department of Trade and Industry (now the 691: 368:Corps of Commissionaires Management Ltd v Hughes 315:Russell v Transocean International Resources Ltd 705:Court of Justice of the European Union case law 417: 403: 136: 97:Department of Business, Innovation and Skills 150: 410: 396: 143: 129: 99:) stated in guideline to employers on the 16:European labour law and UK labour law case 244:Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd 376:Gallagher v Alpha Catering Services Ltd 692: 391: 124: 104:to unmeasured or predetermined time. 663:Legal services in the United Kingdom 13: 346:Working time in the United Kingdom 14: 731: 260:HM Revenue and Customs v Stringer 198:Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz 715:2006 in European Union case law 710:2006 in United Kingdom case law 700:United Kingdom labour case law 275:Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Jaeger 113:with SI 2006/99 regulation 2. 1: 168:Working Time Regulations 1998 101:Working Time Regulations 1998 85:Working Time Regulations 1998 290:Barber v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd 83:, which is relevant for the 7: 680:United Kingdom law category 213:Commission v United Kingdom 116: 107: 64:Commission v United Kingdom 24:Commission v United Kingdom 10: 736: 544:English administrative law 301:Employment Rights Act 1996 676: 655: 579: 500: 433:Parliamentary sovereignty 425: 419:Law of the United Kingdom 342: 326: 310: 298: 286: 271: 256: 239: 224: 209: 194: 179: 165: 156: 53: 48: 36: 32:European Court of Justice 28: 23: 383: 90: 571:English civil procedure 448:Law of Northern Ireland 151:Sources on working time 587:British Virgin Islands 371:IRLR 122, also on rest 362:Working Time Directive 228:R v DTI ex parte BECTU 81:Working Time Directive 55:Working Time Directive 553:English criminal law 521:English contract law 159:Directive 2003/88/EC 79:case concerning the 73:European labour law 562:English family law 438:Constitutional law 687: 686: 668:British penal law 352: 351: 60: 59: 727: 647:English case law 530:English land law 512:English tort law 412: 405: 398: 389: 388: 331: 316: 245: 145: 138: 131: 122: 121: 21: 20: 735: 734: 730: 729: 728: 726: 725: 724: 690: 689: 688: 683: 672: 651: 632:Anglo-Saxon law 580:Related systems 575: 501:Parallel fields 496: 492:Retained EU law 477:Competition law 463:Civil liberties 421: 416: 386: 353: 348: 338: 329: 322: 314: 306: 294: 282: 267: 252: 243: 235: 220: 205: 190: 175: 161: 152: 149: 119: 110: 93: 17: 12: 11: 5: 733: 723: 722: 717: 712: 707: 702: 685: 684: 677: 674: 673: 671: 670: 665: 659: 657: 653: 652: 650: 649: 644: 639: 634: 629: 624: 619: 614: 609: 604: 602:European Union 599: 594: 589: 583: 581: 577: 576: 574: 573: 564: 555: 546: 537: 532: 523: 514: 504: 502: 498: 497: 495: 494: 489: 487:Commercial law 484: 479: 474: 472:insolvency law 465: 460: 455: 450: 445: 440: 435: 429: 427: 423: 422: 415: 414: 407: 400: 392: 385: 382: 381: 380: 372: 364: 359: 350: 349: 343: 340: 339: 327: 324: 323: 311: 308: 307: 299: 296: 295: 287: 284: 283: 272: 269: 268: 257: 254: 253: 240: 237: 236: 225: 222: 221: 210: 207: 206: 195: 192: 191: 180: 177: 176: 166: 163: 162: 157: 154: 153: 148: 147: 140: 133: 125: 118: 115: 109: 106: 92: 89: 58: 57: 51: 50: 46: 45: 38: 34: 33: 30: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 732: 721: 718: 716: 713: 711: 708: 706: 703: 701: 698: 697: 695: 682: 681: 675: 669: 666: 664: 661: 660: 658: 654: 648: 645: 643: 640: 638: 635: 633: 630: 628: 627:United States 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 584: 582: 578: 572: 568: 565: 563: 559: 556: 554: 550: 547: 545: 541: 538: 536: 533: 531: 527: 524: 522: 518: 515: 513: 509: 506: 505: 503: 499: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 473: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 431: 430: 428: 426:Common fields 424: 420: 413: 408: 406: 401: 399: 394: 393: 390: 378: 377: 373: 370: 369: 365: 363: 360: 358: 357:UK labour law 355: 354: 347: 341: 336: 332: 325: 321: 318: 317: 309: 305: 302: 297: 292: 291: 285: 281: 277: 276: 270: 266: 262: 261: 255: 251: 247: 246: 238: 234: 230: 229: 223: 219: 215: 214: 208: 204: 200: 199: 193: 189: 185: 184: 183:SIMAP v CSCGV 178: 173: 169: 164: 160: 155: 146: 141: 139: 134: 132: 127: 126: 123: 114: 105: 102: 98: 88: 86: 82: 78: 77:UK labour law 74: 70: 66: 65: 56: 52: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 22: 19: 720:Working time 678: 508:Scots delict 374: 366: 312: 288: 273: 258: 241: 226: 211: 196: 181: 172:SI 1998/1833 111: 94: 63: 62: 61: 18: 622:New Zealand 443:English law 44:, IRLR 888 694:Categories 637:Common law 482:Labour law 607:Hong Kong 592:Australia 458:Welsh law 453:Scots law 37:Citations 656:See also 304:ss 50-70 280:C-151/02 265:C-520/06 250:C-131/04 233:C-173/99 218:C-484/04 203:C-397/01 188:C-303/98 117:See also 108:Judgment 69:C-484/04 49:Keywords 42:C-484/04 617:Ireland 468:Company 320:UKSC 57 293:ICR 679 278:(2003) 263:(2009) 248:(2006) 231:(2001) 216:(2006) 201:(2005) 186:(2000) 67:(2006) 40:(2006) 642:Equity 597:Canada 535:Trusts 612:India 567:Scots 558:Scots 549:Scots 540:Scots 526:Scots 517:Scots 384:Notes 91:Facts 71:is a 29:Court 569:and 560:and 551:and 542:and 528:and 519:and 510:and 470:and 344:see 335:c 22 75:and 696:: 87:. 411:e 404:t 397:v 337:) 333:( 174:) 170:( 144:e 137:t 130:v

Index

C-484/04
Working Time Directive
C-484/04
European labour law
UK labour law
Working Time Directive
Working Time Regulations 1998
Department of Business, Innovation and Skills
Working Time Regulations 1998
v
t
e
Directive 2003/88/EC
Working Time Regulations 1998
SI 1998/1833
SIMAP v CSCGV
C-303/98
Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
C-397/01
Commission v United Kingdom
C-484/04
R v DTI ex parte BECTU
C-173/99
Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd
C-131/04
HM Revenue and Customs v Stringer
C-520/06
Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Jaeger
C-151/02
Barber v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑