145:, unlikely to have occurred purely by chance. However, not all of those statistically significant differences are clinically significant, in that they do not either explain existing information about the client, or provide useful direction for intervention. Differences that are small in magnitude typically lack practical relevance and are unlikely to be clinically significant. Differences that are common in the population are also unlikely to be clinically significant, because they may simply reflect a level of normal human variation. Additionally, clinicians look for information in the assessment data and the client's history that corroborates the relevance of the statistical difference, to establish the connection between performance on the specific test and the individual's more general functioning.
74:= 0.05, it means that there is only a 5% probability of obtaining the observed results under the assumption that the difference is entirely due to chance (i.e., the null hypothesis is true); it gives no indication of the magnitude or clinical importance of the difference. When statistically significant results are achieved, they favor rejection of the null hypothesis, but they do not prove that the null hypothesis is false. Likewise, non-significant results do not prove that the null hypothesis is true; they also give no evidence of the truth or falsity of the hypothesis the researcher has generated. Statistical significance relates only to the compatibility between observed data and what would be expected under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.
153:
Just as there are many ways to calculate statistical significance and practical significance, there are a variety of ways to calculate clinical significance. Five common methods are the
Jacobson-Truax method, the Gulliksen-Lord-Novick method, the Edwards-Nunnally method, the Hageman-Arrindell method,
108:
Effect size is one type of practical significance. It quantifies the extent to which a sample diverges from expectations. Effect size can provide important information about the results of a study, and are recommended for inclusion in addition to statistical significance. Effect sizes have their own
125:
For example, a treatment might significantly change depressive symptoms (statistical significance), the change could be a large decrease in depressive symptoms (practical significance- effect size), and 40% of the patients no longer met the diagnostic criteria for depression (clinical significance).
112:
Although clinical significance and practical significance are often used synonymously, a more technical restrictive usage denotes this as erroneous. This technical use within psychology and psychotherapy not only results from a carefully drawn precision and particularity of language, but it enables
212:
HLM involves growth curve analysis instead of pre-test post-test comparisons, so three data points are needed from each patient, instead of only two data points (pre-test and post-test). A computer program, such as
Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling is used to calculate change estimates for
197:
The
Hageman-Arrindell calculation of clinical significance involves indices of group change and of individual change. The reliability of change indicates whether a patient has improved, stayed the same, or deteriorated. A second index, the clinical significance of change, indicates four categories
133:
was first proposed by
Jacobson, Follette, and Revenstorf as a way to answer the question, is a therapy or treatment effective enough such that a client does not meet the criteria for a diagnosis? Jacobson and Truax later defined clinical significance as "the extent to which therapy moves someone
121:
In contrast, when used as a technical term within psychology and psychotherapy, clinical significance yields information on whether a treatment was effective enough to change a patient's diagnostic label. In terms of clinical treatment studies, clinical significance answers the question "Is a
188:
The
Edwards-Nunnally method of calculating clinical significance is a more stringent alternative to the Jacobson-Truax method. Reliability scores are used to bring the pre-test scores closer to the mean, and then a confidence interval is developed for this adjusted pre-test score. Confidence
134:
outside the range of the dysfunctional population or within the range of the functional population." They proposed two components of this index of change: the status of a patient or client after therapy has been completed, and "how much change has occurred during the course of therapy."
92:
is the intervention or treatment, or how much change does the treatment cause. In terms of testing clinical treatments, practical significance optimally yields quantified information about the importance of a finding, using metrics such as
167:
of the difference. Cutoff scores are established for placing participants into one of four categories: recovered, improved, unchanged, or deteriorated, depending on the directionality of the RCI and whether the cutoff score was met.
162:
Jacobson-Truax is common method of calculating clinical significance. It involves calculating a
Reliability Change Index (RCI). The RCI equals the difference between a participant's pre-test and post-test scores, divided by the
255:
189:
intervals are used when calculating the change from pre-test to post-test, so greater actual change in scores is necessary to show clinical significance, compared to the
Jacobson-Truax method.
739:
Hageman WJ, Arrindell WA (December 1999). "Establishing clinically significant change: increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis".
704:
Speer DC, Greenbaum PE (December 1995). "Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: support for an individual growth curve approach".
126:
It is very possible to have a treatment that yields a significant difference and medium or large effect sizes, but does not move a patient from dysfunctional to functional.
460:
Vacha-Haase T, Nilsson JE, Reetz DR, Lance TS, Thompson B (June 2000). "Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size".
296:
541:
Jacobson NS, Follette WC, Revenstorf D (September 1984). "Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance".
669:
Hsu LM (December 1999). "A comparison of three methods of identifying reliable and clinically significant client changes: commentary on
Hageman and Arrindell".
109:
sources of bias, are subject to change based on population variability of the dependent variable, and tend to focus on group effects, not individual changes.
70:= 0.05 or 0.01), which signifies the probability of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis. If there is a significant difference between two groups at
180:. This is done by subtracting the pre-test and post-test scores from a population mean, and dividing by the standard deviation of the population.
573:
Jacobson NS, Truax P (February 1991). "Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research".
235:
17:
653:
625:
335:
31:
is the practical importance of a treatment effectβwhether it has a real genuine, palpable, noticeable effect on daily life.
59:
198:
similar to those used by
Jacobson-Truax: deteriorated, not reliably changed, improved but not recovered, and recovered.
774:
105:. Practical significance may also convey semi-quantitative, comparative, or feasibility assessments of utility.
351:
Haase RF, Ellis MV, Ladany N (1989). "Multiple
Criteria for Evaluating the Magnitude of Experimental Effects".
207:
807:
447:
Clinical" Significance: "Clinical" Significance and "Practical" Significance are NOT the Same Things
275:
812:
142:
138:
45:
176:
The Gulliksen-Lord-Novick method is similar to Jacobson-Truax, except that it takes into account
817:
514:
Wilkinson L (1999). "Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations".
270:
177:
98:
113:
a shift in perspective from group effects to the specifics of change(s) within an individual.
63:
213:
each participant. HLM also allows for analysis of growth curve models of dyads and groups.
8:
102:
409:
382:
141:
of an individual. Frequently, there will be a difference of scores or subscores that is
598:
230:
51:
752:
682:
554:
756:
721:
686:
649:
621:
590:
414:
331:
288:
602:
449:. Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
748:
713:
678:
582:
550:
523:
496:
469:
404:
394:
360:
280:
137:
Clinical significance is also a consideration when interpreting the results of the
641:
55:
717:
500:
330:(9th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Klower/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
527:
364:
284:
164:
586:
801:
473:
399:
88:
In broad usage, the "practical clinical significance" answers the question,
778:
760:
690:
418:
292:
222:
725:
594:
94:
83:
383:"Clinical significance in dementia research: a review of the literature"
122:
treatment effective enough to cause the patient to be normal ?"
459:
387:
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias
540:
328:
Nursing Research: Generating Evidence for Nursing Practice
256:"The meanings and measurement of clinical significance"
148:
201:
640:
487:
Cohen J (1997). "The earth is round (p < 0.05)".
321:
319:
317:
620:(5th ed.). San Diego: Sattler Publications.
799:
738:
568:
566:
564:
350:
440:
438:
436:
434:
432:
430:
428:
314:
775:"SSI - Scientific Software International, Inc"
703:
380:
706:Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
618:Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations
575:Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
572:
561:
263:Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
425:
376:
374:
646:Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence
39:
513:
408:
398:
381:Shabbir SH, Sanders AE (September 2014).
371:
325:
274:
77:
444:
171:
34:
615:
236:Minimal clinically important difference
58:(that there is no relationship between
14:
800:
253:
648:(3rd ed.). Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
486:
129:Within psychology and psychotherapy,
677:(12): 1195β202, discussion 1219β33.
480:
192:
149:Calculation of clinical significance
50:Statistical significance is used in
668:
183:
24:
202:Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM)
154:and hierarchical linear modeling.
25:
829:
157:
116:
353:Journal of Counseling Psychology
767:
732:
697:
662:
634:
609:
741:Behaviour Research and Therapy
671:Behaviour Research and Therapy
534:
507:
453:
445:Peterson L (7 February 2008).
344:
247:
13:
1:
753:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00032-7
683:10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00033-9
555:10.1016/S0005-7894(84)80002-7
241:
208:Hierarchical linear modeling
27:In medicine and psychology,
7:
718:10.1037/0022-006x.63.6.1044
501:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
216:
66:is selected (most commonly
10:
834:
644:, Lichtenberger E (2006).
528:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594
365:10.1037/0022-0167.36.4.511
326:Polit DF, Beck CT (2012).
285:10.1037/0022-006x.67.3.332
205:
81:
43:
587:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12
489:The American Psychologist
143:statistically significant
474:10.1177/0959354300103006
400:10.1177/1533317514522539
139:psychological assessment
46:statistical significance
40:Statistical significance
462:Theory & Psychology
254:Kazdin AE (June 1999).
178:regression to the mean
99:number needed to treat
78:Practical significance
18:Clinically significant
516:American Psychologist
172:Gulliksen-Lord-Novick
131:clinical significance
64:level of significance
35:Types of significance
29:clinical significance
616:Sattler JM (2008).
103:preventive fraction
302:on 6 November 2013
231:Medical statistics
52:hypothesis testing
808:Clinical research
655:978-0-471-73553-3
627:978-0-9702671-6-0
337:978-1-60547-782-4
193:Hageman-Arrindell
16:(Redirected from
825:
791:
790:
788:
786:
777:. Archived from
771:
765:
764:
736:
730:
729:
701:
695:
694:
666:
660:
659:
638:
632:
631:
613:
607:
606:
570:
559:
558:
543:Behavior Therapy
538:
532:
531:
511:
505:
504:
495:(12): 997β1003.
484:
478:
477:
457:
451:
450:
442:
423:
422:
412:
402:
378:
369:
368:
348:
342:
341:
323:
312:
311:
309:
307:
301:
295:. Archived from
278:
260:
251:
184:Edwards-Nunnally
21:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
813:Clinical trials
798:
797:
794:
784:
782:
773:
772:
768:
747:(12): 1169β93.
737:
733:
702:
698:
667:
663:
656:
639:
635:
628:
614:
610:
571:
562:
539:
535:
512:
508:
485:
481:
458:
454:
443:
426:
379:
372:
349:
345:
338:
324:
315:
305:
303:
299:
276:10.1.1.595.9231
258:
252:
248:
244:
219:
210:
204:
195:
186:
174:
160:
151:
119:
86:
80:
62:) is tested. A
56:null hypothesis
48:
42:
37:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
831:
821:
820:
815:
810:
793:
792:
781:on 2 June 2009
766:
731:
696:
661:
654:
633:
626:
608:
560:
533:
522:(8): 594β604.
506:
479:
468:(3): 413β425.
452:
424:
370:
359:(4): 511β516.
343:
336:
313:
245:
243:
240:
239:
238:
233:
228:
218:
215:
206:Main article:
203:
200:
194:
191:
185:
182:
173:
170:
165:standard error
159:
158:Jacobson-Truax
156:
150:
147:
118:
117:Specific usage
115:
82:Main article:
79:
76:
54:, whereby the
44:Main article:
41:
38:
36:
33:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
819:
818:Biostatistics
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
805:
803:
796:
780:
776:
770:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
735:
727:
723:
719:
715:
712:(6): 1044β8.
711:
707:
700:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
665:
657:
651:
647:
643:
637:
629:
623:
619:
612:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
569:
567:
565:
556:
552:
549:(4): 336β52.
548:
544:
537:
529:
525:
521:
517:
510:
502:
498:
494:
490:
483:
475:
471:
467:
463:
456:
448:
441:
439:
437:
435:
433:
431:
429:
420:
416:
411:
406:
401:
396:
392:
388:
384:
377:
375:
366:
362:
358:
354:
347:
339:
333:
329:
322:
320:
318:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:
272:
268:
264:
257:
250:
246:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
226:
221:
220:
214:
209:
199:
190:
181:
179:
169:
166:
155:
146:
144:
140:
135:
132:
127:
123:
114:
110:
106:
104:
100:
96:
91:
90:how effective
85:
75:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
47:
32:
30:
19:
795:
783:. Retrieved
779:the original
769:
744:
740:
734:
709:
705:
699:
674:
670:
664:
645:
636:
617:
611:
578:
574:
546:
542:
536:
519:
515:
509:
492:
488:
482:
465:
461:
455:
446:
393:(6): 492β7.
390:
386:
356:
352:
346:
327:
304:. Retrieved
297:the original
269:(3): 332β9.
266:
262:
249:
224:
211:
196:
187:
175:
161:
152:
136:
130:
128:
124:
120:
111:
107:
89:
87:
71:
67:
49:
28:
26:
581:(1): 12β9.
101:(NNT), and
95:effect size
84:effect size
802:Categories
642:Kaufman AS
306:3 November
242:References
271:CiteSeerX
60:variables
761:10596464
691:10596465
603:28125243
419:24526758
410:10852744
293:10369053
223:Cohen's
217:See also
785:19 July
726:8543708
595:2002127
759:
724:
689:
652:
624:
601:
593:
417:
407:
334:
291:
273:
599:S2CID
300:(PDF)
259:(PDF)
787:2009
757:PMID
722:PMID
687:PMID
650:ISBN
622:ISBN
591:PMID
415:PMID
332:ISBN
308:2013
289:PMID
749:doi
714:doi
679:doi
583:doi
551:doi
524:doi
497:doi
470:doi
405:PMC
395:doi
361:doi
281:doi
804::
755:.
745:37
743:.
720:.
710:63
708:.
685:.
675:37
673:.
597:.
589:.
579:59
577:.
563:^
547:15
545:.
520:54
518:.
493:49
491:.
466:10
464:.
427:^
413:.
403:.
391:29
389:.
385:.
373:^
357:36
355:.
316:^
287:.
279:.
267:67
265:.
261:.
97:,
789:.
763:.
751::
728:.
716::
693:.
681::
658:.
630:.
605:.
585::
557:.
553::
530:.
526::
503:.
499::
476:.
472::
421:.
397::
367:.
363::
340:.
310:.
283::
225:h
72:Ξ±
68:Ξ±
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.