29:
317:
300:
The issue before the
Supreme Court was the decision of the board was a question of jurisdiction, which would set a standard of review of correctness, and whether a different standard of review should be applied to external statutes such as the Canada Labour Code.
290:. The board considered the issue of whether Goldhawk's conduct was protected by the code. They found that it was and that the CBC violated the code. It was reasoned that the article was directed at the union and so was protected under the code.
120:
An administrative tribunal's decision that interprets external legislation does not automatically mean the standard of review becomes "correctness", if the decision is one that would otherwise be within the tribunal's
283:(CBC) found his conduct unacceptable as he was both a host and president. The CBC asked that he chose either to leave one of his two positions. He chose to step down as president and remain a host.
246:. The decision affirms the "pragmatic and functional approach" to labour relations and rules that the standard of review for interpreting external legislation should usually be one of
114:
272:
328:
286:
The union filed a complaint against the CBC for interference with the administration of the union's business which was prohibited under the
415:
410:
54:
Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation v. Canada Labour Relations Board and Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists
430:
425:
353:
276:
405:
280:
82:
374:
279:
and free trade. He wrote an article in the union's newspaper that was highly critical of free trade. The
387:
148:
370:
366:
294:
239:
86:
34:
420:
267:
8:
144:
287:
247:
164:
110:
60:
28:
156:
243:
168:
275:(ACTRA). During the federal election, Goldhawk was an outspoken opponent of the
297:
and found that on the facts the board decision was not patently unreasonable.
399:
258:
172:
137:
152:
316:
117:
decision regarding labour practices is one of "patent unreasonableness".
160:
262:
309:
Justice
Iacobucci, writing for the majority, dismissed the appeal.
293:
The
Federal Court of Appeal held that the standard of review was
235:
Canadian
Broadcasting Corp v Canada (Labour Relations Board)
22:
Canadian
Broadcasting Corp v Canada (Labour Relations Board)
273:
Alliance of
Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists
187:
Iacobucci (paras. 1–87), joined by Lamer, Cory, and Major
397:
238:, 1 S.C.R. 157 is a leading decision of the
304:
398:
354:List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
311:
388:SCC Case Information - Docket 23142
277:North American Free Trade Agreement
13:
14:
442:
416:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
359:
281:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
83:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
411:Canadian administrative case law
315:
27:
381:
1:
431:Canadian trade union case law
426:Supreme Court of Canada cases
253:
203:L'Heureux‑Dubé (paras. 89–93)
115:Canada Labour Relations Board
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
7:
347:
10:
447:
227:McLachlin (paras. 100–136)
45:Judgment: January 27, 1995
406:1995 in Canadian case law
223:
215:
207:
199:
191:
183:
178:
133:
128:
105:
100:
92:
77:
69:
59:
49:
42:
26:
21:
43:Hearing: March 14, 1994
390:Supreme Court of Canada
367:Supreme Court of Canada
295:patent unreasonableness
240:Supreme Court of Canada
87:Federal Court of Appeal
35:Supreme Court of Canada
211:Sopinka (paras. 94–98)
305:Decision of the court
271:and president of the
268:Cross Country Checkup
149:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
81:Judgment against the
195:La Forest (para. 88)
219:Gonthier (para. 99)
327:. You can help by
288:Canada Labour Code
165:Beverley McLachlin
111:standard of review
345:
344:
231:
230:
438:
391:
385:
340:
337:
319:
312:
157:Charles Gonthier
145:GĂ©rard La Forest
142:Puisne Justices:
129:Court membership
96:Appeal dismissed
31:
19:
18:
446:
445:
441:
440:
439:
437:
436:
435:
396:
395:
394:
386:
382:
362:
350:
341:
335:
332:
325:needs expansion
307:
256:
244:judicial review
169:Frank Iacobucci
140:
124:
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
444:
434:
433:
428:
423:
418:
413:
408:
393:
392:
379:
378:
377:
361:
360:External links
358:
357:
356:
349:
346:
343:
342:
322:
320:
306:
303:
261:was a host of
255:
252:
229:
228:
225:
221:
220:
217:
213:
212:
209:
205:
204:
201:
197:
196:
193:
189:
188:
185:
181:
180:
176:
175:
135:Chief Justice:
131:
130:
126:
125:
123:
122:
118:
106:
103:
102:
98:
97:
94:
90:
89:
79:
75:
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
443:
432:
429:
427:
424:
422:
419:
417:
414:
412:
409:
407:
404:
403:
401:
389:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:Full text of
364:
363:
355:
352:
351:
339:
330:
326:
323:This section
321:
318:
314:
313:
310:
302:
298:
296:
291:
289:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
264:
260:
259:Dale Goldhawk
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:Reasons given
177:
174:
173:John C. Major
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
139:
138:Antonio Lamer
136:
132:
127:
121:jurisdiction.
119:
116:
112:
108:
107:
104:
99:
95:
91:
88:
84:
80:
78:Prior history
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
421:Jurisdiction
383:
369:decision at
333:
329:adding to it
324:
308:
299:
292:
285:
266:
257:
234:
233:
232:
153:John Sopinka
141:
134:
65:1 S.C.R. 157
53:
33:
248:correctness
216:Concurrence
208:Concurrence
200:Concurrence
192:Concurrence
400:Categories
373: and
254:Background
161:Peter Cory
70:Docket No.
336:June 2008
263:CBC Radio
61:Citations
348:See also
184:Majority
224:Dissent
101:Holding
85:in the
375:CanLII
93:Ruling
73:23142
371:LexUM
113:of a
109:The
331:.
265:'s
242:on
402::
250:.
171:,
167:,
163:,
159:,
155:,
151:,
147:,
338:)
334:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
