1525:
1355:, which possesses numerous benefits over a single decision tree generated without randomness. In a random forest, each tree "votes" on whether or not to classify a sample as positive based on its features. The sample is then classified based on majority vote. An example of this is given in the diagram below, where the four trees in a random forest vote on whether or not a patient with mutations A, B, F, and G has cancer. Since three out of four trees vote yes, the patient is then classified as cancer positive.
1359:
1190:
2246:
1243:
1386:, as they are much easier to interpret and generally require less data for training. As an integral component of random forests, bootstrap aggregating is very important to classification algorithms, and provides a critical element of variability that allows for increased accuracy when analyzing new data, as discussed below.
1291:
1351:
means that each tree only knows about the data pertaining to a small constant number of features, and a variable number of samples that is less than or equal to that of the original dataset. Consequently, the trees are more likely to return a wider array of answers, derived from more diverse knowledge. This results in a
1381:
There are several important factors to consider when designing a random forest. If the trees in the random forests are too deep, overfitting can still occur due to over-specificity. If the forest is too large, the algorithm may become less efficient due to an increased runtime. Random forests also do
1453:
Random
Forests are more complex to implement than lone decision trees or other algorithms. This is because they take extra steps for bagging, as well as the need for recursion in order to produce an entire forest, which complicates implementation. Because of this, it requires much more computational
1476:
Much easier to interpret than a random forest. A single tree can be walked by hand (by a human) leading to a somewhat "explainable" understanding for the analyst of what the tree is actually doing. As the number of trees and schemes grow for ensembling those trees into predictions, this reviewing
1472:
Works well with non-linear data. As most tree based algorithms use linear splits, using an ensemble of a set of trees works better than using a single tree on data that has nonlinear properties (i.e. most real world distributions). Working well with non-linear data is a huge advantage because other
1341:
This process is repeated recursively for successive levels of the tree until the desired depth is reached. At the very bottom of the tree, samples that test positive for the final feature are generally classified as positive, while those that lack the feature are classified as negative. These trees
1935:
samples were drawn. Each sample is composed of a random subset of the original data and maintains a semblance of the master set's distribution and variability. For each bootstrap sample, a LOESS smoother was fit. Predictions from these 100 smoothers were then made across the range of the data. The
1350:
The next part of the algorithm involves introducing yet another element of variability amongst the bootstrapped trees. In addition to each tree only examining a bootstrapped set of samples, only a small but consistent number of unique features are considered when ranking them as classifiers. This
1301:
Creating the bootstrap and out-of-bag datasets is crucial since it is used to test the accuracy of a random forest algorithm. For example, a model that produces 50 trees using the bootstrap/out-of-bag datasets will have a better accuracy than if it produced 10 trees. Since the algorithm generates
1497:
To recreate specific results you need to keep track of the exact random seed used to generate the bootstrap sets. This may be important when collecting data for research or within a data mining class. Using random seeds is essential to the random forests, but can make it hard to support your
2015:). Breiman developed the concept of bagging in 1994 to improve classification by combining classifications of randomly generated training sets. He argued, "If perturbing the learning set can cause significant changes in the predictor constructed, then bagging can improve accuracy".
1466:
Requires much more time to train the data compared to decision trees. Having a large forest can quickly begin to decrease the speed in which one's program operates because it has to traverse much more data even though each tree is using a smaller set of samples and features.
1440:
The algorithm may change significantly if there is a slight change to the data being bootstrapped and used within the forests. In other words, random forests are incredibly dependent on their data sets, changing these can drastically change the individual trees' structures.
1330:
The diagram below shows a decision tree of depth two being used to classify data. For example, a data point that exhibits
Feature 1, but not Feature 2, will be given a "No". Another point that does not exhibit Feature 1, but does exhibit Feature 3, will be given a "Yes".
1418:
Decide on accuracy or speed: Depending on the desired results, increasing or decreasing the number of trees within the forest can help. Increasing the number of trees generally provides more accurate results while decreasing the number of trees will provide quicker
2259:
1402:(otherwise known as bootstrapping), there are certain techniques that can be used in order to improve their execution and voting time, their prediction accuracy, and their overall performance. The following are key steps in creating an efficient random forest:
1314:
from the bootstrapped dataset. To achieve this, the process examines each gene/feature and determines for how many samples the feature's presence or absence yields a positive or negative result. This information is then used to compute a
1946:
By taking the average of 100 smoothers, each corresponding to a subset of the original data set, we arrive at one bagged predictor (red line). The red line's flow is stable and does not overly conform to any data point(s).
2373:
1336:
1406:
Specify the maximum depth of trees: Instead of allowing your random forest to continue until all nodes are pure, it is better to cut it off at a certain point in order to further decrease chances of overfitting.
1377:
where it is important to be able to predict future results based on past data. One of their applications would be as a useful tool for predicting cancer based on genetic factors, as seen in the above example.
1302:
multiple trees and therefore multiple datasets the chance that an object is left out of the bootstrap dataset is low. The next few sections talk about how the random forest algorithm works in more detail.
1409:
Prune the dataset: Using an extremely large dataset may prove to create results that is less indicative of the data provided than a smaller set that more accurately represents what is being focused on.
1489:
Does not predict beyond the range of the training data. This is a con because while bagging is often effective, all of the data is not being considered, therefore it cannot predict an entire dataset.
1373:, which attempts to draw observed connections between statistical variables in a dataset. This makes random forests particularly useful in such fields as banking, healthcare, the stock market, and
1446:
Easy data preparation. Data is prepared by creating a bootstrap set and a certain number of decision trees to build a random forest that also utilizes feature selection, as mentioned in the
1323:
based on their confusion matrices. Some common metrics include estimate of positive correctness (calculated by subtracting false positives from true positives), measure of "goodness", and
1286:
Keep in mind that since both datasets are sets, when taking the difference the duplicate names are ignored in the bootstrap dataset. The illustration below shows how the math is done:
1319:, which lists the true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives of the feature when used as a classifier. These features are then ranked according to various
1904:
for i = 1 to m { D' = bootstrap sample from D (sample with replacement) Ci = I(D') } C*(x) = argmax #{i:Ci(x)=y} (most often predicted label y) yâY
2149:
1936:
black lines represent these initial predictions. The lines lack agreement in their predictions and tend to overfit their data points: evident by the wobbly flow of the lines.
1382:
not generally perform well when given sparse data with little variability. However, they still have numerous advantages over similar data classification algorithms such as
1940:
1238:
However, the difference is that the bootstrap dataset can have duplicate objects. Here is a simple example to demonstrate how it works along with the illustration below:
866:
1898:
1851:
1824:
1795:
1748:
1721:
1671:
1620:
1162:
1120:
1074:
904:
1927:
The relationship between temperature and ozone appears to be nonlinear in this data set, based on the scatter plot. To mathematically describe this relationship,
1871:
1768:
1691:
1644:
1593:
1573:
1553:
1178:
sample. Sampling with replacement ensures each bootstrap is independent from its peers, as it does not depend on previous chosen samples when sampling. Then,
1039:
1999:
The concept of bootstrap aggregating is derived from the concept of bootstrapping which was developed by
Bradley Efron. Bootstrap aggregating was proposed by
1494:
The random forest classifier operates with a high accuracy and speed. Random forests are much faster than decision trees because of using a smaller data set.
1282:
It can be calculated by taking the difference between the original and the bootstrap datasets. In this case, the remaining samples who were not selected are
861:
1209:. Bagging was shown to improve preimage learning. On the other hand, it can mildly degrade the performance of stable methods such as K-nearest neighbors.
851:
1486:
and runs efficiently on even large data sets. This is the result of the random forest's use of bagging in conjunction with random feature selection.
2617:
692:
1226:
Each section below will explain how each dataset is made except for the original dataset. The original dataset is whatever information is given.
2085:, Proceedings of the Electronic Voting Technology Workshop (EVT '07), Boston, MA, August 6, 2007. More generally, when drawing with replacement
899:
856:
707:
438:
2348:
939:
742:
2299:
2461:
818:
1369:
their data, and run quickly and efficiently even for large datasets. They are primarily useful for classification as opposed to
1327:. These features are then used to partition the samples into two sets: those who possess the top feature, and those who do not.
1365:
Because of their properties, random forests are considered one of the most accurate data mining algorithms, are less likely to
367:
1437:
There are overall less requirements involved for normalization and scaling, making the use of random forests more convenient.
2663:
2687:
1092:
876:
639:
174:
1270:
In this case, the bootstrap sample contained four duplicates for
Constantine, and two duplicates for Lexi, and Theodore.
894:
1324:
1202:
1088:
727:
702:
651:
2692:
775:
770:
423:
1268:
James, Ellie, Constantine, Lexi, John, Constantine, Theodore, Constantine, Anthony, Lexi, Constantine, and
Theodore.
433:
71:
2374:"Why Choose Random Forest and Not Decision Trees â Towards AI â The World's Leading AI and Technology Publication"
2393:
1931:
smoothers (with bandwidth 0.5) are used. Rather than building a single smoother for the complete data set, 100
932:
828:
592:
413:
2488:
1959:
Many weak learners aggregated typically outperform a single learner over the entire set, and have less overfit
2625:
Kotsiantis, Sotiris (2014). "Bagging and boosting variants for handling classifications problems: a survey".
2034:
803:
505:
281:
2055:
760:
697:
607:
585:
428:
418:
979:
911:
823:
808:
269:
91:
1186:
bootstrap samples and combined by averaging the output (for regression) or voting (for classification).
2682:
2549:
2169:
2029:
1198:
987:
871:
798:
548:
443:
231:
164:
124:
1335:
2024:
1166:
925:
531:
299:
169:
2610:
2096:
2563:
2511:
2272:
2183:
1921:
1258:
Emily, Jessie, George, Constantine, Lexi, Theodore, John, James, Rachel, Anthony, Ellie, and Jamal.
553:
473:
396:
314:
144:
106:
101:
61:
56:
1967:
500:
349:
249:
76:
1912:
To illustrate the basic principles of bagging, below is an analysis on the relationship between
1242:
2558:
2178:
2049:
1932:
1524:
1320:
1175:
1003:
680:
656:
558:
319:
294:
254:
66:
2419:"An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants"
2247:
Image denoising with a multi-phase kernel principal component approach and an ensemble version
1413:
Continue pruning the data at each node split rather than just in the original bagging process.
1290:
2597:
1081:
634:
456:
408:
179:
51:
2060:
1876:
1829:
1802:
1773:
1726:
1699:
1649:
1598:
1234:
The bootstrap dataset is made by randomly picking objects from the original dataset. Also,
1140:
1098:
1052:
563:
513:
8:
1370:
991:
666:
602:
573:
478:
304:
237:
223:
209:
184:
134:
86:
46:
2642:
2576:
2440:
2196:
1984:
For a weak learner with high bias, bagging will also carry high bias into its aggregate
1973:
1856:
1753:
1676:
1629:
1578:
1558:
1538:
1024:
644:
568:
354:
149:
2590:"adabag: An R package for classification with AdaBoost.M1, AdaBoost-SAMME and Bagging"
2659:
2323:
2218:
1963:
1206:
1197:
Bagging leads to "improvements for unstable procedures", which include, for example,
1007:
972:
737:
580:
493:
289:
259:
204:
199:
154:
96:
2646:
2580:
2200:
2080:
2634:
2568:
2520:
2444:
2430:
2188:
2039:
1928:
1358:
1316:
983:
765:
518:
468:
378:
362:
332:
194:
189:
139:
129:
27:
1006:
methods, it can be used with any type of method. Bagging is a special case of the
1917:
1473:
data mining techniques such as single decision trees do not handle this as well.
793:
597:
463:
403:
1508:
1383:
1125:
975:
813:
344:
81:
2638:
2435:
2418:
1511:, or by grouping values together to avoid values that are terribly far apart.
2676:
2525:
2506:
2502:
2044:
1460:
1399:
1395:
1352:
1311:
732:
661:
543:
274:
159:
2589:
1976:, as each separate bootstrap can be processed on its own before aggregation
1533:
1504:
1019:
1463:, forests are able to more accurately make predictions than single trees.
1222:
There are three types of datasets in bootstrap aggregating. These are the
1095:. By sampling with replacement, some observations may be repeated in each
2544:
2164:
2000:
1483:
1366:
999:
538:
32:
2572:
2192:
2093:(different and equally likely), the expected number of unique draws is
1498:
statements based on forests if there is a failure to record the seeds.
1374:
687:
383:
309:
1280:
represents the remaining people who were not in the bootstrap dataset.
846:
627:
1507:
and datasets with many outliers well. They deal with this by using
1189:
995:
2249:, IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, pp.1-7, 2011.
2228:(421). Department of Statistics, University of California Berkeley
1873:, the classification predicted most often by the sub-classifiers
622:
2079:
Aslam, Javed A.; Popa, Raluca A.; and Rivest, Ronald L. (2007);
1826:
is generated by using the previously created set of classifiers
1528:
Flow chart of the bagging algorithm when used for classification
2258:
Shinde, Amit, Anshuman Sahu, Daniel Apley, and George Runger. "
1174:, the rest being duplicates. This kind of sample is known as a
373:
1913:
617:
612:
339:
2260:
Preimages for
Variation Patterns from Kernel PCA and Bagging
2082:
On
Estimating the Size and Confidence of a Statistical Audit
1990:
Can be computationally expensive depending on the data set
1310:
The next step of the algorithm involves the generation of
2654:
Boehmke, Bradley; Greenwell, Brandon (2019). "Bagging".
2061:
Predictive analysis: Classification and regression trees
1939:
1193:
An illustration for the concept of bootstrap aggregating
905:
List of datasets in computer vision and image processing
1389:
2349:"Random Forest Algorithm Advantages and Disadvantages"
2099:
1879:
1859:
1832:
1805:
1776:
1756:
1729:
1702:
1679:
1652:
1632:
1601:
1581:
1561:
1541:
1143:
1101:
1055:
1027:
2300:"Introduction to Random Forest in Machine Learning"
2507:"Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife"
2143:
1892:
1865:
1845:
1818:
1789:
1762:
1742:
1715:
1685:
1665:
1638:
1614:
1587:
1567:
1547:
1342:are then used as predictors to classify new data.
1273:
1156:
1114:
1068:
1033:
1262:By randomly picking a group of names, let us say
1236:it must be the same size as the original dataset.
1229:
2674:
2653:
2003:who also coined the abbreviated term "bagging" (
2304:Engineering Education (EngEd) Program | Section
1950:
1477:becomes much more difficult if not impossible.
1013:
900:List of datasets for machine-learning research
2588:Alfaro, E., GĂĄmez, M. and GarcĂa, N. (2012).
2273:"Random forests - classification description"
1519:
1394:While the techniques described above utilize
1305:
1224:original, bootstrap, and out-of-bag datasets.
933:
1424:Pros and Cons of Random Forests and Bagging
1357:
2489:"Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating), Overview"
2416:
1212:
2624:
2462:"What is Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregation)?"
940:
926:
2616:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
2562:
2524:
2434:
2182:
1284:Emily, Jessie, George, Rachel, and Jamal.
2658:. Chapman & Hall. pp. 191â202.
2262:." IIE Transactions, Vol.46, Iss.5, 2014
1523:
1188:
1164:is expected to have the fraction (1 - 1/
2543:
2216:
2163:
1770:to determine the classification of set
16:Ensemble method within machine learning
2675:
2587:
2486:
1907:
2501:
2456:
2454:
2410:
1170:) (â63.2%) of the unique examples of
2294:
2292:
2212:
2210:
2159:
2157:
1987:Loss of interpretability of a model.
1575:and the number of bootstrap samples
1390:Improving Random Forests and Bagging
1002:. Although it is usually applied to
2487:Zoghni, Raouf (September 5, 2020).
1920:and Leroy (1986), analysis done in
1454:power and computational resources.
1203:classification and regression trees
895:Glossary of artificial intelligence
13:
2537:
2495:
2451:
1962:Reduces variance in high-variance
1938:
1182:models are fitted using the above
14:
2704:
2491:. The Startup – via Medium.
2417:Bauer, Eric; Kohavi, Ron (1999).
2346:
2289:
2245:Sahu, A., Runger, G., Apley, D.,
2207:
2154:
1345:
2656:Hands-On Machine Learning with R
2371:
1966:weak learner, which can improve
1595:as input. Generate a classifier
1334:
1289:
1241:
2480:
2386:
2365:
2324:"Random Forest Pros & Cons"
2217:Breiman, Leo (September 1994).
1274:Creating the out-of-bag dataset
2547:(1996). "Bagging predictors".
2340:
2316:
2265:
2252:
2239:
2167:(1996). "Bagging predictors".
2144:{\displaystyle n(1-e^{-n'/n})}
2138:
2103:
2073:
1230:Creating the bootstrap dataset
315:Relevance vector machine (RVM)
1:
2468:. Corporate Finance Institute
2066:
2035:Cross-validation (statistics)
1296:
804:Computational learning theory
368:Expectationâmaximization (EM)
2056:Resampled efficient frontier
1951:Advantages and disadvantages
1217:
1014:Description of the technique
761:Coefficient of determination
608:Convolutional neural network
320:Support vector machine (SVM)
7:
2688:Machine learning algorithms
2398:Corporate Finance Institute
2018:
1916:and temperature (data from
1900:is the final classification
912:Outline of machine learning
809:Empirical risk minimization
10:
2709:
2030:Bootstrapping (statistics)
1994:
1532:For classification, use a
1520:Algorithm (classification)
1306:Creation of Decision Trees
1205:, and subset selection in
1199:artificial neural networks
988:statistical classification
549:Feedforward neural network
300:Artificial neural networks
2639:10.1017/S0269888913000313
2025:Boosting (meta-algorithm)
1853:on the original data set
1482:There is a lower risk of
973:machine learning ensemble
532:Artificial neural network
2693:Computational statistics
2512:The Annals of Statistics
2347:K, Dhiraj (2020-11-22).
1213:Process of the algorithm
978:designed to improve the
841:Journals and conferences
788:Mathematical foundations
698:Temporal difference (TD)
554:Recurrent neural network
474:Conditional random field
397:Dimensionality reduction
145:Dimensionality reduction
107:Quantum machine learning
102:Neuromorphic engineering
62:Self-supervised learning
57:Semi-supervised learning
2436:10.1023/A:1007515423169
2089:values out of a set of
1968:efficiency (statistics)
1723:is built from each set
1459:Consisting of multiple
1278:The out-of-bag dataset
250:Apprenticeship learning
2605:Cite journal requires
2526:10.1214/aos/1176344552
2145:
2050:Random subspace method
1943:
1894:
1867:
1847:
1820:
1791:
1764:
1744:
1717:
1687:
1667:
1640:
1616:
1589:
1569:
1549:
1529:
1362:
1321:classification metrics
1194:
1158:
1116:
1070:
1035:
799:Biasâvariance tradeoff
681:Reinforcement learning
657:Spiking neural network
67:Reinforcement learning
2627:Knowledge Eng. Review
2146:
1942:
1895:
1893:{\displaystyle C_{i}}
1868:
1848:
1846:{\displaystyle C_{i}}
1821:
1819:{\displaystyle C^{*}}
1792:
1790:{\displaystyle D_{i}}
1765:
1745:
1743:{\displaystyle D_{i}}
1718:
1716:{\displaystyle C_{i}}
1688:
1668:
1666:{\displaystyle D_{i}}
1641:
1617:
1615:{\displaystyle C^{*}}
1590:
1570:
1550:
1527:
1361:
1264:our bootstrap dataset
1192:
1159:
1157:{\displaystyle D_{i}}
1117:
1115:{\displaystyle D_{i}}
1071:
1069:{\displaystyle D_{i}}
1036:
953:Bootstrap aggregating
635:Neural radiance field
457:Structured prediction
180:Structured prediction
52:Unsupervised learning
2219:"Bagging Predictors"
2097:
1972:Can be performed in
1877:
1857:
1830:
1803:
1774:
1754:
1727:
1700:
1677:
1650:
1630:
1599:
1579:
1559:
1539:
1141:
1099:
1053:
1045:, bagging generates
1025:
824:Statistical learning
722:Learning with humans
514:Local outlier factor
2052:(attribute bagging)
1908:Example: ozone data
1799:Finally classifier
1646:new training sets
1425:
1254:group of 12 people.
998:and helps to avoid
986:algorithms used in
667:Electrochemical RAM
574:reservoir computing
305:Logistic regression
224:Supervised learning
210:Multimodal learning
185:Feature engineering
130:Generative modeling
92:Rule-based learning
87:Curriculum learning
47:Supervised learning
22:Part of a series on
2573:10.1007/BF00058655
2372:Team, Towards AI.
2193:10.1007/BF00058655
2141:
1944:
1890:
1863:
1843:
1816:
1787:
1760:
1740:
1713:
1683:
1663:
1636:
1612:
1585:
1565:
1545:
1530:
1423:
1363:
1195:
1154:
1112:
1066:
1049:new training sets
1031:
994:. It also reduces
235: •
150:Density estimation
2683:Ensemble learning
2665:978-1-138-49568-5
2277:stat.berkeley.edu
1866:{\displaystyle D}
1763:{\displaystyle I}
1686:{\displaystyle D}
1639:{\displaystyle m}
1588:{\displaystyle m}
1568:{\displaystyle I}
1548:{\displaystyle D}
1517:
1516:
1207:linear regression
1133:, then for large
1034:{\displaystyle D}
1018:Given a standard
950:
949:
755:Model diagnostics
738:Human-in-the-loop
581:Boltzmann machine
494:Anomaly detection
290:Linear regression
205:Ontology learning
200:Grammar induction
175:Semantic analysis
170:Association rules
155:Anomaly detection
97:Neuro-symbolic AI
2700:
2669:
2650:
2621:
2614:
2608:
2603:
2601:
2593:
2584:
2566:
2550:Machine Learning
2531:
2530:
2528:
2499:
2493:
2492:
2484:
2478:
2477:
2475:
2473:
2458:
2449:
2448:
2438:
2423:Machine Learning
2414:
2408:
2407:
2405:
2404:
2390:
2384:
2383:
2381:
2380:
2369:
2363:
2362:
2360:
2359:
2344:
2338:
2337:
2335:
2334:
2320:
2314:
2313:
2311:
2310:
2296:
2287:
2286:
2284:
2283:
2269:
2263:
2256:
2250:
2243:
2237:
2236:
2234:
2233:
2226:Technical Report
2223:
2214:
2205:
2204:
2186:
2170:Machine Learning
2161:
2152:
2150:
2148:
2147:
2142:
2137:
2136:
2132:
2127:
2077:
2040:Out-of-bag error
1899:
1897:
1896:
1891:
1889:
1888:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1864:
1852:
1850:
1849:
1844:
1842:
1841:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1817:
1815:
1814:
1796:
1794:
1793:
1788:
1786:
1785:
1769:
1767:
1766:
1761:
1749:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1739:
1738:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1714:
1712:
1711:
1693:with replacement
1692:
1690:
1689:
1684:
1672:
1670:
1669:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1645:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1621:
1619:
1618:
1613:
1611:
1610:
1594:
1592:
1591:
1586:
1574:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1554:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1426:
1422:
1338:
1325:information gain
1317:confusion matrix
1293:
1256:Their names are
1250:original dataset
1245:
1163:
1161:
1160:
1155:
1153:
1152:
1121:
1119:
1118:
1113:
1111:
1110:
1093:with replacement
1075:
1073:
1072:
1067:
1065:
1064:
1040:
1038:
1037:
1032:
984:machine learning
982:and accuracy of
942:
935:
928:
889:Related articles
766:Confusion matrix
519:Isolation forest
464:Graphical models
243:
242:
195:Learning to rank
190:Feature learning
28:Machine learning
19:
18:
2708:
2707:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2673:
2672:
2666:
2615:
2606:
2604:
2595:
2594:
2540:
2538:Further reading
2535:
2534:
2500:
2496:
2485:
2481:
2471:
2469:
2460:
2459:
2452:
2415:
2411:
2402:
2400:
2394:"Random Forest"
2392:
2391:
2387:
2378:
2376:
2370:
2366:
2357:
2355:
2345:
2341:
2332:
2330:
2322:
2321:
2317:
2308:
2306:
2298:
2297:
2290:
2281:
2279:
2271:
2270:
2266:
2257:
2253:
2244:
2240:
2231:
2229:
2221:
2215:
2208:
2162:
2155:
2128:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2098:
2095:
2094:
2078:
2074:
2069:
2021:
1997:
1980:Disadvantages:
1953:
1910:
1905:
1884:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1874:
1858:
1855:
1854:
1837:
1833:
1831:
1828:
1827:
1810:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1781:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1771:
1755:
1752:
1751:
1734:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1707:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1678:
1675:
1674:
1657:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1631:
1628:
1627:
1606:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1596:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1560:
1557:
1556:
1540:
1537:
1536:
1522:
1392:
1384:neural networks
1348:
1308:
1299:
1276:
1232:
1220:
1215:
1148:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1106:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1076:, each of size
1060:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1016:
1008:model averaging
946:
917:
916:
890:
882:
881:
842:
834:
833:
794:Kernel machines
789:
781:
780:
756:
748:
747:
728:Active learning
723:
715:
714:
683:
673:
672:
598:Diffusion model
534:
524:
523:
496:
486:
485:
459:
449:
448:
404:Factor analysis
399:
389:
388:
372:
335:
325:
324:
245:
244:
228:
227:
226:
215:
214:
120:
112:
111:
77:Online learning
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
2706:
2696:
2695:
2690:
2685:
2671:
2670:
2664:
2651:
2622:
2607:|journal=
2585:
2564:10.1.1.32.9399
2557:(2): 123â140.
2539:
2536:
2533:
2532:
2494:
2479:
2450:
2409:
2385:
2364:
2339:
2328:HolyPython.com
2315:
2288:
2264:
2251:
2238:
2206:
2184:10.1.1.32.9399
2177:(2): 123â140.
2153:
2140:
2135:
2131:
2126:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2102:
2071:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2058:
2053:
2047:
2042:
2037:
2032:
2027:
2020:
2017:
1996:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1988:
1985:
1978:
1977:
1970:
1960:
1952:
1949:
1909:
1906:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1887:
1883:
1862:
1840:
1836:
1813:
1809:
1797:
1784:
1780:
1759:
1737:
1733:
1710:
1706:
1694:
1682:
1660:
1656:
1635:
1609:
1605:
1584:
1564:
1544:
1521:
1518:
1515:
1514:
1512:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1487:
1479:
1478:
1474:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1461:decision trees
1456:
1455:
1451:
1448:Random Forests
1443:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1430:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1407:
1396:random forests
1391:
1388:
1347:
1346:Random Forests
1344:
1312:decision trees
1307:
1304:
1298:
1295:
1275:
1272:
1231:
1228:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1151:
1147:
1109:
1105:
1063:
1059:
1030:
1015:
1012:
976:meta-algorithm
955:, also called
948:
947:
945:
944:
937:
930:
922:
919:
918:
915:
914:
909:
908:
907:
897:
891:
888:
887:
884:
883:
880:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
843:
840:
839:
836:
835:
832:
831:
826:
821:
816:
814:Occam learning
811:
806:
801:
796:
790:
787:
786:
783:
782:
779:
778:
773:
771:Learning curve
768:
763:
757:
754:
753:
750:
749:
746:
745:
740:
735:
730:
724:
721:
720:
717:
716:
713:
712:
711:
710:
700:
695:
690:
684:
679:
678:
675:
674:
671:
670:
664:
659:
654:
649:
648:
647:
637:
632:
631:
630:
625:
620:
615:
605:
600:
595:
590:
589:
588:
578:
577:
576:
571:
566:
561:
551:
546:
541:
535:
530:
529:
526:
525:
522:
521:
516:
511:
503:
497:
492:
491:
488:
487:
484:
483:
482:
481:
476:
471:
460:
455:
454:
451:
450:
447:
446:
441:
436:
431:
426:
421:
416:
411:
406:
400:
395:
394:
391:
390:
387:
386:
381:
376:
370:
365:
360:
352:
347:
342:
336:
331:
330:
327:
326:
323:
322:
317:
312:
307:
302:
297:
292:
287:
279:
278:
277:
272:
267:
257:
255:Decision trees
252:
246:
232:classification
222:
221:
220:
217:
216:
213:
212:
207:
202:
197:
192:
187:
182:
177:
172:
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
132:
127:
125:Classification
121:
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
104:
99:
94:
89:
84:
82:Batch learning
79:
74:
69:
64:
59:
54:
49:
43:
40:
39:
36:
35:
24:
23:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2705:
2694:
2691:
2689:
2686:
2684:
2681:
2680:
2678:
2667:
2661:
2657:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2633:(1): 78â100.
2632:
2628:
2623:
2619:
2612:
2599:
2591:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2551:
2546:
2542:
2541:
2527:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2513:
2508:
2504:
2498:
2490:
2483:
2467:
2463:
2457:
2455:
2446:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2413:
2399:
2395:
2389:
2375:
2368:
2354:
2350:
2343:
2329:
2325:
2319:
2305:
2301:
2295:
2293:
2278:
2274:
2268:
2261:
2255:
2248:
2242:
2227:
2220:
2213:
2211:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2171:
2166:
2160:
2158:
2133:
2129:
2124:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2106:
2100:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2076:
2072:
2062:
2059:
2057:
2054:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2045:Random forest
2043:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2028:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2016:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1989:
1986:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1975:
1971:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1948:
1941:
1937:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1885:
1881:
1860:
1838:
1834:
1811:
1807:
1798:
1782:
1778:
1757:
1735:
1731:
1708:
1704:
1695:
1680:
1658:
1654:
1633:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1607:
1603:
1582:
1562:
1542:
1535:
1526:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1475:
1471:
1470:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1452:
1449:
1445:
1444:
1439:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1417:
1412:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1401:
1397:
1387:
1385:
1379:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1360:
1356:
1354:
1353:random forest
1343:
1339:
1337:
1332:
1328:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1303:
1294:
1292:
1287:
1285:
1281:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1246:
1244:
1239:
1237:
1227:
1225:
1210:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1191:
1187:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1149:
1145:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1107:
1103:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1061:
1057:
1048:
1044:
1028:
1021:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1004:decision tree
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
943:
938:
936:
931:
929:
924:
923:
921:
920:
913:
910:
906:
903:
902:
901:
898:
896:
893:
892:
886:
885:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
845:
844:
838:
837:
830:
827:
825:
822:
820:
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
791:
785:
784:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
758:
752:
751:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
733:Crowdsourcing
731:
729:
726:
725:
719:
718:
709:
706:
705:
704:
701:
699:
696:
694:
691:
689:
686:
685:
682:
677:
676:
668:
665:
663:
662:Memtransistor
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
646:
643:
642:
641:
638:
636:
633:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
610:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
587:
584:
583:
582:
579:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
556:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
544:Deep learning
542:
540:
537:
536:
533:
528:
527:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
508:
504:
502:
499:
498:
495:
490:
489:
480:
479:Hidden Markov
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
466:
465:
462:
461:
458:
453:
452:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
402:
401:
398:
393:
392:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
357:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
337:
334:
329:
328:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
284:
280:
276:
275:Random forest
273:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
261:
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
247:
240:
239:
234:
233:
225:
219:
218:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
193:
191:
188:
186:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
160:Data cleaning
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
122:
116:
115:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
72:Meta-learning
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
44:
38:
37:
34:
29:
26:
25:
21:
20:
2655:
2630:
2626:
2598:cite journal
2554:
2548:
2545:Breiman, Leo
2516:
2510:
2497:
2482:
2470:. Retrieved
2465:
2426:
2422:
2412:
2401:. Retrieved
2397:
2388:
2377:. Retrieved
2367:
2356:. Retrieved
2352:
2342:
2331:. Retrieved
2327:
2318:
2307:. Retrieved
2303:
2280:. Retrieved
2276:
2267:
2254:
2241:
2230:. Retrieved
2225:
2174:
2168:
2165:Breiman, Leo
2090:
2086:
2081:
2075:
2012:
2008:
2004:
1998:
1979:
1955:Advantages:
1954:
1945:
1926:
1911:
1534:training set
1531:
1505:missing data
1447:
1393:
1380:
1364:
1349:
1340:
1333:
1329:
1309:
1300:
1288:
1283:
1279:
1277:
1267:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:Suppose the
1247:
1240:
1235:
1233:
1223:
1221:
1196:
1183:
1179:
1171:
1165:
1134:
1130:
1123:
1085:
1077:
1046:
1042:
1020:training set
1017:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
819:PAC learning
506:
355:
350:Hierarchical
282:
264:
236:
230:
2519:(1): 1â26.
2472:December 5,
2429:: 108â109.
2001:Leo Breiman
1696:Classifier
1503:Deals with
1484:overfitting
1000:overfitting
703:Multi-agent
640:Transformer
539:Autoencoder
295:Naive Bayes
33:data mining
2677:Categories
2403:2021-11-26
2379:2021-11-26
2358:2021-11-26
2333:2021-11-26
2309:2021-12-09
2282:2021-12-09
2232:2019-07-28
2067:References
1622:as output
1555:, Inducer
1375:e-commerce
1371:regression
1297:Importance
1010:approach.
992:regression
688:Q-learning
586:Restricted
384:Mean shift
333:Clustering
310:Perceptron
238:regression
140:Clustering
135:Regression
2559:CiteSeerX
2503:Efron, B.
2179:CiteSeerX
2118:−
2110:−
2007:ootstrap
1933:bootstrap
1918:Rousseeuw
1812:∗
1608:∗
1450:section.
1218:Key Terms
1176:bootstrap
1089:uniformly
980:stability
963:ootstrap
847:ECML PKDD
829:VC theory
776:ROC curve
708:Self-play
628:DeepDream
469:Bayes net
260:Ensembles
41:Paradigms
2647:27301684
2581:47328136
2505:(1979).
2201:47328136
2125:′
2019:See also
1974:parallel
1964:low-bias
1419:results.
1137:the set
1082:sampling
1041:of size
996:variance
971:), is a
270:Boosting
119:Problems
2445:1088806
1995:History
1673:, from
1626:Create
1509:binning
1400:bagging
1367:overfit
957:bagging
852:NeurIPS
669:(ECRAM)
623:AlexNet
265:Bagging
2662:
2645:
2579:
2561:
2443:
2353:Medium
2199:
2181:
1750:using
959:(from
645:Vision
501:RANSAC
379:OPTICS
374:DBSCAN
358:-means
165:AutoML
2643:S2CID
2577:S2CID
2441:S2CID
2222:(PDF)
2197:S2CID
2011:regat
1929:LOESS
1914:ozone
1432:Cons
1429:Pros
1252:is a
1122:. If
1084:from
1080:, by
967:regat
867:IJCAI
693:SARSA
652:Mamba
618:LeNet
613:U-Net
439:t-SNE
363:Fuzzy
340:BIRCH
2660:ISBN
2618:link
2611:help
2474:2020
1398:and
1266:had
1091:and
990:and
877:JMLR
862:ICLR
857:ICML
743:RLHF
559:LSTM
345:CURE
31:and
2635:doi
2569:doi
2521:doi
2466:CFI
2431:doi
2189:doi
2013:ing
2009:agg
1924:).
969:ing
965:agg
603:SOM
593:GAN
569:ESN
564:GRU
509:-NN
444:SDL
434:PGD
429:PCA
424:NMF
419:LDA
414:ICA
409:CCA
285:-NN
2679::
2641:.
2631:29
2629:.
2602::
2600:}}
2596:{{
2575:.
2567:.
2555:24
2553:.
2515:.
2509:.
2464:.
2453:^
2439:.
2427:36
2425:.
2421:.
2396:.
2351:.
2326:.
2302:.
2291:^
2275:.
2224:.
2209:^
2195:.
2187:.
2175:24
2173:.
2156:^
2087:nâ˛
1201:,
1078:nâ˛
872:ML
2668:.
2649:.
2637::
2620:)
2613:)
2609:(
2592:.
2583:.
2571::
2529:.
2523::
2517:7
2476:.
2447:.
2433::
2406:.
2382:.
2361:.
2336:.
2312:.
2285:.
2235:.
2203:.
2191::
2151:.
2139:)
2134:n
2130:/
2122:n
2114:e
2107:1
2104:(
2101:n
2091:n
2005:b
1922:R
1886:i
1882:C
1861:D
1839:i
1835:C
1808:C
1783:i
1779:D
1758:I
1736:i
1732:D
1709:i
1705:C
1681:D
1659:i
1655:D
1634:m
1604:C
1583:m
1563:I
1543:D
1184:m
1180:m
1172:D
1167:e
1150:i
1146:D
1135:n
1131:n
1129:=
1126:â˛
1124:n
1108:i
1104:D
1086:D
1062:i
1058:D
1047:m
1043:n
1029:D
961:b
941:e
934:t
927:v
507:k
356:k
283:k
241:)
229:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.