Knowledge

AGARD-B wind tunnel model

Source 📝

25: 369: 357: 74:, when it was decided to define two standard wind tunnel model configurations (AGARD-A and AGARD-B) to be used for exchange of test data and comparison of test results of same models tested in different wind tunnels. The idea was to establish standards of comparison between wind tunnels and improve the validity of wind tunnel tests. Among the standard wind tunnel models, AGARD model configuration B (AGARD-B) has become by far the most popular. Initially intended for the supersonic wind tunnels, the AGARD-B configuration has since been tested in many wind tunnels at a wide range of 393: 381: 281: 17: 40: 289: 152:
transition on the model. In order to reduce the scatter of results, in some wind tunnel facilities the model was tested with boundary layer transition trips near the leading edges of the wing and the nose of the body. On the other hand, a number of wind tunnel tests was made without fixed transition.
117:, or large deformations in the plan form of the wing would occur. In the past, this part of the specification was interpreted in different ways by model designers which led to small differences in shapes of the tested models. The recommended solution is to have the leading- and trailing-edge radii of 159:
Some free-flight tests of the AGARD-B model were performed. For these tests, the standard geometry was modified by adding, at the rear end of the body, two triangular vertical stabilisers, one on the ventral and one on the dorsal side of the body. Size of the vertical stabilizers was 50% of the wing
315:
configuration. The horizontal tail has an area equal to 1/6 of the wing area. Sections of the vertical and horizontal tail are circular arc profiles defined identically to the profile of the wing. Forward of the 1.5 D body extension, the geometry of the AGARD-C model is identical to that of the
334:
The longer body of the AGARD-C model and the existence of the tail make it easier to detect (from anomalies in the wind tunnel test results) if the shock waves reflected from the walls of the wind tunnel test section are passing too close to the rear end of the model. The existence of the tail
341:
In order to reduce cost and produce more versatile wind tunnel models, actual designs of AGARD-B and AGARD-C are sometimes realized as an AGARD-B configuration to which a body segment with the T-tail can be attached at the rear end to form the AGARD-C configuration.
81:
AGARD-B is a body-wing configuration. All its dimensions are given in terms of the body diameter "D" so that the model can be produced in any scale, as appropriate for a particular wind tunnel. The body is an 8.5 diameters long
140:
in order to reduce sting interference, but at that moment a number of wind tunnel tests had already been made. Therefore, published test results for the AGARD-B models do not all correspond to theoretical model configuration.
240:. Moments are reduced to a point in the plane of symmetry of the model, at the longitudinal position of 50% of the m.a.c. (however, in some published results, moments were reduced to a point at 25% of the m.a.c.). 368: 311:, in 1954, it was agreed to add a third model configuration to the family of AGARD calibration models, by extending the body of the AGARD-B by 1.5 diameters and by adding a horizontal and a vertical tail in the 356: 502:
Piland, R.O., "The Zero-Lift Drag of a 60 Delta-Wing-Body Combination (AGARD Model 2) Obtained from Free-Flight Tests Between Mach Numbers 0.8 and 1.7", NACA TN-3081, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, NACA,
31:, left, is joined by Air Force and NASA officials while inspecting two of the models used in the high velocity, high altitude wind tunnels at Arnold Air Force Base. The missiles are Agard-B and 512:
Anderson C.F., An Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of the AGARD Model B for Mach Numbers from 0.1 to 1.0, AEDC-TR-70-100, Arnold Engineering Development Center, 1970
292:
An AGARD-C model with a body diameter of 115.7 mm. This configuration was assembled by attaching a 1.5-diameters-long body section to the rear end of the AGARD-B model shown in the
153:
Drag results with and without the fixed boundary layer transition differ, which should not be neglected when comparing test results from different wind tunnel laboratories.
78:, from low subsonic (Mach 0.1), through transonic (Mach 0.7 to 1.4) to hypersonic (up to Mach 8 and above). Therefore, a considerable database of test results is available. 167:
AGARD-B standard model is intended primarily for the measurement of aerodynamic forces and moments. Test results are most often presented in the form of nondimensional
392: 380: 20:
A drawing defining the geometry of the AGARD-B standard model and its sting fixture; all dimensions are relative to body diameter D (dimensions according to )
464: 101:
in the form of an equilateral triangle with a span of four body diameters. Wing section is a symmetric cylindrical arc with a relative thickness t/c of 4%.
338:
AGARD-C is primarily used in the transonic wind tunnels and the database of published test results is somewhat smaller than the one for the AGARD-B model.
168: 86:
consisting of a 5.5 diameters long cylindrical segment and a nose with a length of 3 diameters and having a local radius defined by the equation
272:
Some laboratories have selected to test the AGARD-B standard model for periodic checkouts of the quality of measurements in their wind tunnels.
172: 66:
standard wind tunnel models. Its origin dates to the year 1952, and the Second Meeting of the AGARD Wind Tunnel and Model Testing Panel in
374:
An AGARD-B model installed on a sting is shown in the test section of Supersonic Wind Tunnel A in the von Kármán Gas Dynamics Facility
128:
to be used with the AGARD-B model was defined as well. The initial specification of the model called for a sting having a diameter of
54:(calibration model) that is used to verify, by comparison of test results with previously published data, the measurement chain in a 362:
An AGARD-B model installed on a sting is shown in the tank below Supersonic Wind Tunnel A in the von Kármán Gas Dynamics Facility
156:
In some wind tunnel laboratories, AGARD-B was tested in non-standard configurations, e.g. as a half-model (half-span model).
546: 461: 293: 121:
at the theoretical root chord and to decrease the radii towards the wing tips proportionally to the local chord.
316:
AGARD-B. Also, the position of the moments reduction point (the aerodynamic centre) is the same as on AGARD-B.
24: 113:. However, this specification is unclear. It is obvious that the specified radius can not be applied near the 335:
generally makes this model more sensitive than AGARD-B to flow curvature in the wind tunnel test section.
414: 51: 591: 28: 491:"AGARD-B Standard Model Tests in JAXA 0.8 m by 0.45 m High Reynolds Number Transonic Wind Tunnel" 490: 201: 586: 191: 539: 323:
for the AGARD-C model is identical to the sting for the AGARD-B model, having a length of
8: 83: 398:
The AGARD model in the B configuration is installed in the 16-foot transonic wind tunnel
386:
The AGARD model in the C configuration is installed in the 16-foot transonic wind tunnel
563: 175:. Reference area for the calculation of the coefficients is the theoretical wing area 480:
Specification for AGARD Wind Tunnel Calibration Models, AGARD memorandum, AGARD, 1955
564:"Observations on Some Transonic Wind Tunnel Tests of a Standard Model with a T-Tail" 493:, JAXA-SP-09-005, Proceedings of the Wind Technology Association 81st meeting, 2009 284:
A drawing defining the geometry of the AGARD-C standard model and its sting fixture
266: 241: 280: 16: 550: 468: 320: 125: 522: 148:
characteristics of the AGARD-B model were found to be somewhat sensitive to the
149: 145: 523:"T-38 Wind-Tunnel Data Quality Assurance Based on Testing of a Standard Model" 580: 106: 102: 489:
Aoki Y., Kanda H., Sato M., Nagai S., Itabashi Y., Nishijima H., Kimura T.
215:
while the reference length for the yawing and rolling moment coefficients
567: 543: 409: 288: 75: 55: 39: 32: 540:"Testing of AGARD-B calibration model in the T-38 Trisonic Wind Tunnel" 98: 471:, AGARDograph 64, Aircraft Research Association Bedford, England, 1961 136:. In the revised specification the length of the sting was changed to 230: 442:
Wind Tunnel Calibration Models, AGARD Specification 2, AGARD, 1958
114: 562:
Damljanovic D., Vukovic Ð., Vitic A., Isakovic J., Ocokoljic G.
265:
computed from the measured base pressure on the model. Likewise,
312: 308: 529:, Vol. 50, No. 4 (2013), pp. 1141-1149. doi: 10.2514/1.C032081 526: 304: 300: 71: 63: 94: 67: 462:"A Review of Measurements on AGARD Calibration Models" 251:
obtained by subtracting, from the total measured drag
351:
AGARD models used at Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee
109:
of the wing should be rounded with a radius equal to
538:Damljanovic D., Vitic A., Vukovic Ð., Isakovic J., 43:An AGARD-B model with a body diameter of 115.7 mm 578: 303:Wind Tunnel and Model Testing Panel meeting in 438: 436: 434: 432: 430: 515: 521:Damljanovic D, Isakovic J. and Rašuo B., 474: 427: 287: 279: 38: 23: 15: 556: 456: 454: 452: 450: 448: 244:is presented in terms of forebody drag 579: 532: 506: 445: 327:aft of model base and a diameter of 483: 13: 14: 603: 391: 379: 367: 355: 58:. Together with its derivative 496: 1: 420: 59: 7: 568:Scientific Technical Review 544:Scientific Technical Review 415:Standard wind tunnel models 403: 192:pitching moment coefficient 190:. Reference length for the 10: 608: 345: 275: 269:represents forebody lift. 160:size, i.e. their span was 62:it belongs to a family of 52:standard wind tunnel model 169:aerodynamic coefficients 570:66 (4), 2016, pp. 34-39 553:56 (2), 2006, pp. 52-62 296: 285: 202:mean aerodynamic chord 44: 36: 21: 291: 283: 42: 27: 19: 527:Journal of Aircraft 84:solid of revolution 29:Theodore von Kármán 549:2014-07-14 at the 467:2014-07-14 at the 297: 286: 204:(m.a.c.) equal to 45: 37: 22: 599: 571: 560: 554: 536: 530: 519: 513: 510: 504: 500: 494: 487: 481: 478: 472: 458: 443: 440: 395: 383: 371: 359: 330: 326: 267:Lift coefficient 264: 258:, the base drag 257: 250: 242:Drag coefficient 239: 228: 221: 214: 212: 211: 199: 189: 187: 186: 173:wind axes system 163: 139: 135: 132:and a length of 131: 120: 112: 89: 607: 606: 602: 601: 600: 598: 597: 596: 592:Physical models 577: 576: 575: 574: 561: 557: 551:Wayback Machine 537: 533: 520: 516: 511: 507: 501: 497: 488: 484: 479: 475: 469:Wayback Machine 459: 446: 441: 428: 423: 406: 399: 396: 387: 384: 375: 372: 363: 360: 348: 328: 324: 278: 263: 259: 256: 252: 249: 245: 237: 233: 227: 223: 220: 216: 209: 207: 205: 198: 194: 184: 182: 180: 176: 161: 137: 133: 129: 118: 110: 87: 12: 11: 5: 605: 595: 594: 589: 573: 572: 555: 531: 514: 505: 495: 482: 473: 444: 425: 424: 422: 419: 418: 417: 412: 405: 402: 401: 400: 397: 390: 388: 385: 378: 376: 373: 366: 364: 361: 354: 352: 347: 344: 277: 274: 261: 254: 247: 235: 225: 218: 196: 178: 150:boundary layer 107:trailing edges 33:Atlas Series B 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 604: 593: 590: 588: 585: 584: 582: 569: 565: 559: 552: 548: 545: 541: 535: 528: 524: 518: 509: 499: 492: 486: 477: 470: 466: 463: 457: 455: 453: 451: 449: 439: 437: 435: 433: 431: 426: 416: 413: 411: 408: 407: 394: 389: 382: 377: 370: 365: 358: 353: 350: 349: 343: 339: 336: 332: 322: 317: 314: 310: 306: 302: 295: 290: 282: 273: 270: 268: 243: 232: 203: 193: 174: 170: 165: 157: 154: 151: 147: 142: 127: 122: 116: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 85: 79: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 41: 34: 30: 26: 18: 587:Wind tunnels 558: 534: 517: 508: 498: 485: 476: 340: 337: 333: 319:The support 318: 298: 294:figure above 271: 166: 158: 155: 143: 123: 92: 80: 76:Mach numbers 47: 46: 410:Wind tunnel 56:wind tunnel 581:Categories 460:Hills R., 421:References 124:A support 88:y = x/3 · 231:wing span 547:Archived 465:Archived 404:See also 229:is the 115:wingtips 35:. (1959) 346:Gallery 299:At the 276:AGARD-C 208:√ 200:is the 183:√ 171:in the 119:0.002 D 111:0.002 D 103:Leading 60:AGARD-C 48:AGARD-B 313:T-tail 309:France 238:= 4 D) 329:0.5 D 321:sting 305:Paris 301:AGARD 162:2.5 D 134:1.5 D 130:0.5 D 126:sting 99:delta 97:is a 72:Italy 64:AGARD 50:is a 503:1954 222:and 146:drag 144:The 105:and 95:wing 93:The 68:Rome 325:3 D 236:ref 213:D/3 181:= 4 179:ref 138:3 D 583:: 566:, 542:, 525:, 447:^ 429:^ 331:. 307:, 262:xb 248:xf 234:(B 164:. 90:. 70:, 260:C 255:x 253:C 246:C 226:l 224:C 219:n 217:C 210:3 206:4 197:m 195:C 188:D 185:3 177:S

Index



Theodore von Kármán
Atlas Series B

standard wind tunnel model
wind tunnel
AGARD-C
AGARD
Rome
Italy
Mach numbers
solid of revolution
wing
delta
Leading
trailing edges
wingtips
sting
drag
boundary layer
aerodynamic coefficients
wind axes system
pitching moment coefficient
mean aerodynamic chord
wing span
Drag coefficient
Lift coefficient

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.