2113:
19:
349:
set up spike strips along the route, Mullenix decided to shoot at Leija's car as an alternative attempt to disable it. He radioed his superior officer as to his plans, but took his shooting position before receiving a response. His superior told
Mullenix to "stand by" and wait to see if the spike strips work, but he claimed that he did not hear this order. Mullenix ended up killing Leija instead, and it was later found that the suspect was actually unarmed. Beatrice Luna, representing Leija's family and estate, then sued Mullenix on grounds that he violated Leija's
224:(CBLA), a technique that was generally accepted at the time, was used as evidence against him. By the time the Maryland Court of Appeals heard his case, CBLA had been discredited and abandoned. The Court ruled that it found no support for the lower court's conclusion that Kulbicki's defense attorneys were constitutionally required to predict the demise of CBLA: "Counsel did not perform deficiently by dedicating their time and focus to elements of the defense that did not involve poking methodological holes in a then-uncontroversial mode of ballistics analysis."
368:, citing the fact that Mullenix was not properly trained to use a rifle in this type of situation, he fired less than a second before the car hit the spike strip, and did not follow the order to "stand by." She wrote, "by sanctioning a 'shoot first, think later' approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow."
348:
trooper
Chadrin Mullenix, who killed suspect Israel Leija, Jr. as he was fleeing officers during a high-speed chase. During the pursuit which reached up to 110 miles per hour, Leija twice called police stating that he had a gun and threatened to shoot anyone who tried to stop him. As several officers
353:
right by using excessive force. The Court however ruled that
Mullenix is entitled to qualified immunity, stating that the Court has "never found the use of deadly force in connection with a dangerous car chase to violate the Fourth Amendment, let alone to be a basis for denying qualified immunity."
1557:
Bar" (which states that a defendant procedurally defaults a claim raised for the first time on state collateral review if he could have raised it earlier on direct appeal) is inadequate to bar federal habeas review. The Court reversed the Ninth
Circuit on grounds that this procedural bar "is
830:
Alito filed a dissent, joined by Thomas, arguing that the majority should not have made the unusual step of deciding this case without hearing oral arguments or even allowing the parties to file briefs. Alito wrote "that the prosecution should have disclosed this information, but whether the
42:
decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on the Court at the time the decision was handed down are assumed to have participated and concurred unless otherwise noted.
361:, arguing that any use of force that eventually kills a suspect should not automatically be classified as "deadly force". He stated that in this case, "though it was force sufficient to kill, it was not applied with the object of harming the body of the felon."
482:. The juror in question was excused on the basis that he could not provide sufficient answers as to whether he could be neutral or impartial in considering the death penalty in the case. The Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Circuit unreasonably applied
1449:
that states that if a state court order denies a habeas petition without explanation, it is presumed that the order agrees with the "last reasoned state court opinion" in the case unless there is "strong evidence" to the contrary.
600:
It, like any other state or federal court, is bound by the
Supreme Court's interpretation of federal law. In this case, the Idaho Supreme Court concluded that it was not bound by the Supreme Court's interpretation in
1670:(1994), which states "where a capital defendant's future dangerousness is at issue, and the only sentencing alternative to death available to the jury is life imprisonment without possibility of parole," the
365:
2300:
358:
2305:
1317:
Third, Fifth, Tenth, and
District of Columbia Circuits vacated and remanded for reconsideration, in light of the "positions asserted by the parties in their supplemental briefs," on whether
2017:
1941:
1248:
1789:
1772:
1755:
1738:
1496:
1367:
642:
2360:
2350:
2315:
1956:
1936:
1931:
1117:
407:
2422:
2095:
1946:
1925:
2427:
2023:
269:
2101:
1951:
1919:
1886:
220:
right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. James
Kulbicki was arrested for murdering his 22-year old mistress. At the time of his initial trial, a
2089:
2083:
2077:
2065:
2047:
1961:
966:, the State of Alabama must recognize the adoption decree granted by a Georgia state court in 2007, regardless of how that court came to its conclusion granting the decree.
717:
2340:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2071:
2053:
2041:
2035:
2029:
1892:
1867:
1862:
2345:
2059:
1767:
764:
1681:, and then stated that "today’s decision imposes a magic-words requirement" and "is a remarkably aggressive use of our power to review the States' highest courts".
2417:
2310:
872:
2295:
2396:
2333:
2323:
1620:
783:
533:
2376:
2355:
1695:
1690:
1398:
1200:
1154:
495:
430:
2128:
1504:
1445:
1379:
1256:
1131:
650:
415:
277:
2328:
1829:
1030:
350:
296:
2381:
1142:
479:
426:
217:
166:
827:
Louisiana prosecutors violated
Michael Wearry's due process rights when they failed to disclose evidence supporting his innocence in a murder case.
603:
1332:
Sotomayor filed a concurrence, joined by
Ginsburg, cautioning lower courts not to read any signals in the Supreme Court's actions in this case.
1750:
2112:
2003:
2290:
1994:
2285:
1851:
2391:
2386:
722:
670:
1674:
entitles the defendant 'to inform the jury of parole ineligibility, either by a jury instruction or in arguments by counsel.'"
1019:
1859:
1814:
1723:
1390:
1267:
1146:
552:
26:
1275:
345:
139:
247:
Chadrin Lee
Mullenix v. Beatrice Luna, individually and as representative of the Estate of Israel Leija, Jr., et al.
221:
884:
1987:
1784:
1259:
2015); rehearing en banc denied, No. 14-1377, 3d Cir. April 6, 2015; certiorari granted, 577 U.S. ___ (2015)
1844:
1011:
963:
911:
768:
658:
1349:
Scott Kernan, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Antonio A. Hinojosa
1034:
411:
131:
1609:
1666:
880:
876:
151:
1508:
354:
Furthermore, it was not clearly established the Mullenix " one dangerous alternative over another."
1980:
1597:
977:
474:
The Sixth Circuit overturned a death sentence in Kentucky, ruling that excusing "Juror 638" during
281:
212:
321:
1837:
772:
581:
484:
127:
1052:
800:
1637:
1593:
1318:
1293:
1015:
447:
313:
1526:
1416:
1172:
1079:
The Massachusetts court erred in upholding a law that prohibited the possession of stun guns.
935:
688:
573:
183:
2133:
1972:
1605:
1322:
900:
654:
831:
information was sufficient to warrant reversing petitioner's conviction is another matter."
1645:
1394:
1301:
1534:
1424:
1180:
1122:
35:
opinions during its 2015 term, which began October 5, 2015 and concluded October 2, 2016.
18:
8:
1677:
Thomas filed a dissent, joined by Alito. Thomas repeated what he wrote in his dissent in
1326:
541:
70:
1226:
David A. Zubik, et al. v. Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
1150:
1810:
1671:
1244:
1060:
943:
808:
696:
490:
341:
455:
155:
1608:
2010); defendant resentenced, No. 2001-092032, Ariz. Sup. Ct., Maricopa Cty.; aff'd,
191:
147:
1271:
1601:
1500:
1375:
1252:
1214:
1127:
1014:
April 29, 2013); defendant convicted, No. 1149-CR-2522, Mass. Dist. Ct.; aff'd, 26
646:
537:
273:
235:
556:
82:
66:
62:
475:
135:
74:
58:
2411:
916:
842:
78:
52:
1199:
The Sixth Circuit did not properly apply the standard of review under the
1558:
longstanding, oft-cited, and shared by habeas courts across the nation".
1453:
Sotomayor filed a dissent, joined by Ginsburg, arguing that applying the
86:
824:
District Court of Louisiana, Livingston Parish, reversed and remanded.
143:
31:
1082:
Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, joined by Thomas.
715:
The Ninth Circuit did not properly apply the standard established in
494:, and should have instead applied the Court's interpretations of the
1507:
2010); on remand, petition denied, No. 01-10751, C.D. Cal.; rev'd,
895:
836916 (Ala. Ct. Civ. App. Feb. 27, 2015); rev., No. 1140595, 2015
1722:, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari
896:
892:
285:
265:
607:, regarding awarding attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant.
2002:
1076:
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts vacated and remanded.
1768:
Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
2423:
Lists of 2015 term United States Supreme Court opinions
871:
Judgment for petitioner, No. CS-13-719 (April 15, 2014
2428:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
887:
Oct. 24, 2014); on rehearing, aff'd in part, sub nom.
1714:
The descriptions of five opinions have been omitted:
1696:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 578
1691:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 577
1553:
The Ninth Circuit previously held that California's "
1399:
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
1201:
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
1155:
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
496:
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
431:
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
1592:
Defendant convicted and sentenced, No. 2001-092032,
1457:
test should have affirmed the Ninth Circuit ruling.
1788:, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), noted that the judgment was
1771:, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), noted that the judgment was
1754:, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), noted that the judgment was
1737:, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), noted that the judgment was
771:August 14, 2013); review denied, No. 13-KP-2422 (
280:2014); opinion withdrawn, substituted opinion at
2409:
1661:Supreme Court of Arizona reversed and remanded.
959:Supreme Court of Alabama reversed and remanded.
2418:United States Supreme Court per curiam opinions
1321:other than churches should be exempt from the
597:Supreme Court of Idaho reversed and remanded.
2397:Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted
1988:
1872:Supreme Court of the United States 2015 term
1845:
657:___ (2014); rev'd, rehearing en banc denied,
216:test to determine if a criminal defendant's
1474:Deborah K. Johnson, Warden v. Donna Kay Lee
969:
2004:Lists of United States Supreme Court cases
1995:
1981:
1852:
1838:
624:Amgen Inc., et al. v. Steve Harris, et al.
1664:The Arizona court misapplied the test in
1099:Jeffrey Woods, Warden v. Timothy Etherton
532:Summary judgment granted to defendants,
2116:Seal of the United States Supreme Court
1751:Friedrichs v. California Teachers Assn.
1443:The lower court misapplied the test in
723:Employee Retirement Income Security Act
671:Employee Retirement Income Security Act
610:
385:Randy White, Warden v. Roger L. Wheeler
207:Court of Appeals of Maryland reversed.
91:
2410:
1976:
1833:
1550:Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.
1335:
712:Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.
471:Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded.
1887:Notable cases from the Roberts Court
1790:affirmed by an equally divided Court
1773:affirmed by an equally divided Court
1756:affirmed by an equally divided Court
1739:affirmed by an equally divided Court
1085:
515:Melene James v. City of Boise, Idaho
2018:Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth Courts
1875:(October 5, 2015 – October 2, 2016)
1561:
1206:
1006:Motion to dismiss denied, sub nom.
742:Michael Wearry v. Burl Cain, Warden
371:
227:
46:
13:
2111:
1815:Supreme Court of the United States
27:Supreme Court of the United States
17:
14:
2439:
1811:"2015 Term Opinions of the Court"
1460:
1276:Religious Freedom Restoration Act
728:
501:
346:Texas Department of Public Safety
1120:Feb. 26, 2014); rev'd, sub nom.
222:comparative bullet-lead analysis
122:Postconviction petition denied,
1893:Complete table of 2015 opinions
1116:Petition denied, No. 11-11958,
834:
210:The lower court misapplied the
1708:
1575:Shawn Patrick Lynch v. Arizona
989:Jaime Caetano v. Massachusetts
264:Summary judgment denied, 2013
1:
1802:
1366:Petition denied, No. 12-965,
1243:Judgment for plaintiffs, 983
1499:; aff'd in part, rev'd, 406
964:Full Faith and Credit Clause
721:regarding provisions of the
272:, Aug. 7, 2013); aff'd, 773
7:
1684:
718:Fifth Third v. Dudenhoeffer
288:denied, 77 F. 3d 221 (2014)
284:(5th Cir. 2014); rehearing
154:2013); rev'd and remanded,
10:
2444:
2392:Certiorari before judgment
1491:Petition denied, sub nom.
1212:
975:
840:
759:Petition denied, sub nom.
468:Decided December 14, 2015.
402:Petition denied, sub nom.
233:
134:, January 2, 2008; aff'd,
105:Maryland v. James Kulbicki
61:(died February 13, 2016),
2369:
2278:
2142:
2123:
2109:
2010:
1911:
1882:
1735:Hawkins v. Community Bank
1667:Simmons v. South Carolina
1633:Full text of the opinion:
1631:
1626:
1616:
1588:
1580:
1570:
1522:Full text of the opinion:
1520:
1515:
1487:
1479:
1469:
1412:Full text of the opinion:
1410:
1405:
1386:
1362:
1354:
1344:
1289:Full text of the opinion:
1287:
1282:
1263:
1239:
1231:
1221:
1168:Full text of the opinion:
1166:
1161:
1138:
1112:
1104:
1094:
1048:Full text of the opinion:
1046:
1041:
1026:
1002:
994:
984:
931:Full text of the opinion:
929:
924:
907:
867:
859:
849:
796:Full text of the opinion:
794:
789:
779:
755:
747:
737:
709:Decided January 25, 2016.
684:Full text of the opinion:
682:
677:
665:
641:Dismissed, No. 07-05442,
637:
629:
619:
594:Decided January 25, 2016.
569:Full text of the opinion:
567:
562:
548:
528:
520:
510:
443:Full text of the opinion:
441:
436:
422:
398:
390:
380:
334:Decided November 9, 2015.
309:Full text of the opinion:
307:
302:
292:
260:
252:
242:
179:Full text of the opinion:
177:
172:
162:
118:
110:
100:
1928:(died February 13, 2016)
1724:as improvidently granted
1701:
1440:Ninth Circuit reversed.
1196:Sixth Circuit reversed.
978:Caetano v. Massachusetts
971:Caetano v. Massachusetts
912:U.S. Const., Art. IV, §1
337:Fifth Circuit reversed.
213:Strickland v. Washington
204:Decided October 5, 2015.
2129:List of cases by volume
1073:Decided March 21, 2016.
1037:, ch. 140, §131J (2014)
1008:Commonwealth v. Caetano
485:Witherspoon v. Illinois
2320:Intellectual property
2117:
2011:List of cases by Court
1785:United States v. Texas
1621:U.S. Const. amend. XIV
1319:religious institutions
1193:Decided April 4, 2016.
956:Decided March 7, 2016.
854:V. L. v. E. L., et al.
821:Decided March 7, 2016.
784:U.S. Const. amend. XIV
763:, No. 01–FELN–015992 (
22:
2134:United States Reports
2115:
1658:Decided May 31, 2016.
1638:official slip opinion
1547:Decided May 31, 2016.
1527:official slip opinion
1437:Decided May 16, 2016.
1417:official slip opinion
1323:contraceptive mandate
1314:Decided May 16, 2016.
1294:official slip opinion
1173:official slip opinion
1143:U.S. Const. amend. VI
1053:official slip opinion
1031:U.S. Const. amend. II
936:official slip opinion
801:official slip opinion
689:official slip opinion
574:official slip opinion
448:official slip opinion
427:U.S. Const. amend. VI
406:, No. 3:09-cv-00336,
314:official slip opinion
297:U.S. Const. amend. IV
184:official slip opinion
167:U.S. const. amend. VI
29:handed down eighteen
21:
2387:In-chambers opinions
1395:§ 2254(b)(1)(A)
1010:, No. 1149-CR-2522 (
891:, No. 2130683, 2015
653:2013); vacated, 576
612:Amgen Inc. v. Harris
93:Maryland v. Kulbicki
57:Associate Justices:
1924:Associate Justices
1915:Opinions by justice
1327:Affordable Care Act
903:September 18, 2015)
71:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
2377:Landmark decisions
2301:Capital punishment
2118:
1672:Due Process Clause
1446:Ylst v. Nunnemaker
1370:; rev'd, sub nom.
1337:Kernan v. Hinojosa
1251:2013); rev'd, 778
1123:Etherton v. Rivard
885:Ala. Ct. Civ. App.
775:February 27, 2015)
669:29 U.S.C. § 1104 (
491:Wainwright v. Witt
404:Wheeler v. Simpson
342:qualified immunity
340:The Court granted
140:Md. Ct. Spec. App.
23:
2405:
2404:
2279:By subject matter
1970:
1969:
1651:
1650:
1540:
1539:
1430:
1429:
1372:Hinojosa v. Davey
1307:
1306:
1186:
1185:
1151:§ 2254(d)(1)
1087:Woods v. Etherton
1066:
1065:
949:
948:
814:
813:
769:Livingston Parish
702:
701:
587:
586:
461:
460:
327:
326:
197:
196:
124:Kulbicki v. State
2435:
1997:
1990:
1983:
1974:
1973:
1877:
1876:
1854:
1847:
1840:
1831:
1830:
1825:
1823:
1821:
1796:
1712:
1568:
1567:
1563:Lynch v. Arizona
1495:, No. 01-10751,
1467:
1466:
1342:
1341:
1219:
1218:
1215:Zubik v. Burwell
1208:Zubik v. Burwell
1092:
1091:
982:
981:
920:
847:
846:
735:
734:
617:
616:
508:
507:
378:
377:
373:White v. Wheeler
364:Sotomayor filed
351:Fourth Amendment
240:
239:
236:Mullenix v. Luna
229:Mullenix v. Luna
126:, No. K-93-530,
98:
97:
47:Court membership
2443:
2442:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2401:
2365:
2306:First Amendment
2274:
2138:
2119:
2107:
2096:Rehnquist Court
2006:
2001:
1971:
1966:
1907:
1878:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1865:
1858:
1828:
1819:
1817:
1809:
1805:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1720:Duncan v. Owens
1713:
1709:
1704:
1687:
1660:
1656:
1566:
1549:
1545:
1511:(9th Cir. 2015)
1465:
1439:
1435:
1340:
1316:
1312:
1217:
1211:
1195:
1191:
1090:
1075:
1071:
1035:Mass. Gen. Laws
1012:Mass. Dist. Ct.
980:
974:
958:
954:
915:
845:
839:
823:
819:
761:State v. Wearry
733:
711:
707:
661:(9th Cir. 2014)
615:
596:
592:
534:Idaho Dist. Ct.
506:
480:Sixth Amendment
470:
466:
376:
336:
332:
238:
232:
218:Sixth Amendment
206:
202:
96:
83:Sonia Sotomayor
67:Clarence Thomas
63:Anthony Kennedy
51:Chief Justice:
49:
12:
11:
5:
2441:
2431:
2430:
2425:
2420:
2403:
2402:
2400:
2399:
2394:
2389:
2384:
2379:
2373:
2371:
2367:
2366:
2364:
2363:
2358:
2353:
2348:
2343:
2341:Legal standing
2338:
2337:
2336:
2331:
2326:
2318:
2313:
2308:
2303:
2298:
2293:
2288:
2282:
2280:
2276:
2275:
2273:
2272:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2222:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2192:
2187:
2182:
2177:
2172:
2167:
2162:
2157:
2152:
2146:
2144:
2143:By recent term
2140:
2139:
2127:
2125:
2121:
2120:
2110:
2108:
2106:
2105:
2104:(2005–present)
2099:
2093:
2087:
2081:
2075:
2069:
2063:
2057:
2051:
2045:
2039:
2033:
2027:
2024:Marshall Court
2021:
2014:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2000:
1999:
1992:
1985:
1977:
1968:
1967:
1965:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1922:
1918:Chief Justice
1916:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1906:
1905:
1896:
1889:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1866:
1860:
1857:
1856:
1849:
1842:
1834:
1827:
1826:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1776:
1759:
1742:
1727:
1715:
1706:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1693:
1686:
1683:
1649:
1648:
1635:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1594:Ariz. Sup. Ct.
1590:
1589:Prior history:
1586:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1572:
1565:
1560:
1538:
1537:
1524:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1493:Lee v. Jacquez
1489:
1488:Prior history:
1485:
1484:
1481:
1477:
1476:
1471:
1464:
1462:Johnson v. Lee
1459:
1428:
1427:
1414:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1391:28 U.S.C.
1388:
1384:
1383:
1364:
1363:Prior history:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1346:
1339:
1334:
1305:
1304:
1291:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1268:42 U.S.C.
1265:
1261:
1260:
1241:
1240:Prior history:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1223:
1213:Main article:
1210:
1205:
1184:
1183:
1170:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1147:28 U.S.C.
1140:
1136:
1135:
1114:
1113:Prior history:
1110:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1096:
1089:
1084:
1064:
1063:
1050:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1004:
1003:Prior history:
1000:
999:
996:
992:
991:
986:
976:Main article:
973:
968:
947:
946:
933:
927:
926:
922:
921:
909:
905:
904:
877:Jefferson Cty.
873:Ala. Dist. Ct.
869:
868:Prior history:
865:
864:
861:
857:
856:
851:
841:Main article:
838:
833:
812:
811:
798:
792:
791:
787:
786:
781:
777:
776:
757:
756:Prior history:
753:
752:
749:
745:
744:
739:
732:
730:Wearry v. Cain
727:
700:
699:
686:
680:
679:
675:
674:
667:
663:
662:
639:
638:Prior history:
635:
634:
631:
627:
626:
621:
614:
609:
604:Hughes v. Rowe
585:
584:
571:
565:
564:
560:
559:
553:42 U.S.C.
550:
546:
545:
530:
529:Prior history:
526:
525:
522:
518:
517:
512:
505:
503:James v. Boise
500:
476:jury selection
459:
458:
445:
439:
438:
434:
433:
424:
420:
419:
400:
399:Prior history:
396:
395:
392:
388:
387:
382:
375:
370:
325:
324:
311:
305:
304:
300:
299:
294:
290:
289:
262:
261:Prior history:
258:
257:
254:
250:
249:
244:
234:Main article:
231:
226:
195:
194:
181:
175:
174:
170:
169:
164:
160:
159:
132:Baltimore Cty.
120:
119:Prior history:
116:
115:
112:
108:
107:
102:
95:
90:
75:Stephen Breyer
59:Antonin Scalia
48:
45:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2440:
2429:
2426:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2415:
2413:
2398:
2395:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2385:
2383:
2382:Pending cases
2380:
2378:
2375:
2374:
2372:
2368:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2354:
2352:
2351:Mental health
2349:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2339:
2335:
2332:
2330:
2327:
2325:
2322:
2321:
2319:
2317:
2316:Indian tribes
2314:
2312:
2309:
2307:
2304:
2302:
2299:
2297:
2294:
2292:
2289:
2287:
2284:
2283:
2281:
2277:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2263:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2181:
2178:
2176:
2173:
2171:
2168:
2166:
2163:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2153:
2151:
2148:
2147:
2145:
2141:
2136:
2135:
2130:
2126:
2124:Complete list
2122:
2114:
2103:
2102:Roberts Court
2100:
2097:
2094:
2091:
2088:
2085:
2082:
2079:
2076:
2073:
2070:
2067:
2064:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2037:
2034:
2031:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2016:
2015:
2013:
2009:
2005:
1998:
1993:
1991:
1986:
1984:
1979:
1978:
1975:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1921:
1917:
1914:
1913:
1910:
1904:
1902:
1897:
1895:
1894:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1884:
1881:
1869:
1864:
1855:
1850:
1848:
1843:
1841:
1836:
1835:
1832:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1781:
1777:
1774:
1770:
1769:
1764:
1760:
1757:
1753:
1752:
1747:
1743:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1711:
1707:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1689:
1688:
1682:
1680:
1675:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1662:
1659:
1655:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1630:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1617:Laws applied:
1615:
1611:
1610:357 P. 3d 119
1607:
1603:
1600:; rev'd, 234
1599:
1598:Maricopa Cty.
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1573:
1571:Full caption:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1556:
1551:
1548:
1544:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1519:
1514:
1510:
1509:788 F.3d 1124
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1470:Full caption:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1456:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1441:
1438:
1434:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1409:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1387:Laws applied:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1345:Full caption:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1315:
1311:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1286:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1272:§ 2000bb
1269:
1266:
1264:Laws applied:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1224:
1222:Full caption:
1220:
1216:
1209:
1204:
1202:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1165:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1139:Laws applied:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1095:Full caption:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1027:Laws applied:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
987:
985:Full caption:
983:
979:
972:
967:
965:
960:
957:
953:
945:
941:
937:
934:
932:
928:
923:
918:
917:Ga. Code Ann.
913:
910:
908:Laws applied:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
889:Ex parte E.L.
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
855:
852:
850:Full caption:
848:
844:
837:
832:
828:
825:
822:
818:
810:
806:
802:
799:
797:
793:
788:
785:
782:
780:Laws applied:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:La. Dist. Ct.
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
743:
740:
738:Full caption:
736:
731:
726:
724:
720:
719:
713:
710:
706:
698:
694:
690:
687:
685:
681:
676:
672:
668:
666:Laws applied:
664:
660:
659:788 F. 3d 916
656:
652:
648:
645:; rev'd, 738
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
622:
620:Full caption:
618:
613:
608:
606:
605:
598:
595:
591:
583:
579:
575:
572:
570:
566:
561:
558:
554:
551:
549:Laws applied:
547:
543:
539:
536:; aff'd, 351
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
513:
511:Full caption:
509:
504:
499:
497:
493:
492:
487:
486:
481:
478:violated the
477:
472:
469:
465:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
435:
432:
428:
425:
423:Laws applied:
421:
417:
413:
412:779 F. 3d 366
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
383:
381:Full caption:
379:
374:
369:
367:
362:
360:
359:a concurrence
357:Scalia filed
355:
352:
347:
343:
338:
335:
331:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
301:
298:
295:
293:Laws applied:
291:
287:
283:
282:777 F. 3d 221
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
245:
243:Full caption:
241:
237:
230:
225:
223:
219:
215:
214:
208:
205:
201:
193:
189:
185:
182:
180:
176:
171:
168:
165:
163:Laws applied:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
106:
103:
101:Full caption:
99:
94:
89:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
54:
44:
41:
36:
34:
33:
28:
20:
16:
2346:LGBTQ rights
2132:
2090:Burger Court
2084:Warren Court
2078:Vinson Court
2066:Hughes Court
2048:Fuller Court
1900:
1898:
1891:
1818:. Retrieved
1783:
1779:
1778:The Court's
1766:
1762:
1761:The Court's
1749:
1745:
1744:The Court's
1734:
1730:
1729:The Court's
1719:
1710:
1678:
1676:
1665:
1663:
1657:
1654:578 U.S. ___
1653:
1652:
1641:
1632:
1612:(Ariz. 2015)
1584:578 U.S. ___
1574:
1562:
1554:
1552:
1546:
1543:578 U.S. ___
1542:
1541:
1530:
1521:
1492:
1483:578 U.S. ___
1473:
1461:
1454:
1452:
1444:
1442:
1436:
1433:578 U.S. ___
1432:
1431:
1420:
1411:
1371:
1358:578 U.S. ___
1348:
1336:
1331:
1313:
1310:578 U.S. ___
1309:
1308:
1297:
1288:
1235:578 U.S. ___
1225:
1207:
1198:
1192:
1189:578 U.S. ___
1188:
1187:
1176:
1167:
1121:
1108:578 U.S. ___
1098:
1086:
1081:
1078:
1072:
1069:577 U.S. ___
1068:
1067:
1056:
1047:
1007:
998:577 U.S. ___
988:
970:
961:
955:
952:577 U.S. ___
951:
950:
939:
930:
888:
863:577 U.S. ___
853:
843:V.L. v. E.L.
836:V.L. v. E.L.
835:
829:
826:
820:
817:577 U.S. ___
816:
815:
804:
795:
760:
751:577 U.S. ___
741:
729:
716:
714:
708:
705:577 U.S. ___
704:
703:
692:
683:
633:577 U.S. ___
623:
611:
602:
599:
593:
590:577 U.S. ___
589:
588:
577:
568:
524:577 U.S. ___
514:
502:
489:
483:
473:
467:
464:577 U.S. ___
463:
462:
451:
442:
403:
394:577 U.S. ___
384:
372:
363:
356:
339:
333:
330:577 U.S. ___
329:
328:
317:
308:
256:577 U.S. ___
246:
228:
211:
209:
203:
200:577 U.S. ___
199:
198:
187:
178:
156:99 A. 3d 730
146:granted, 61
123:
114:577 U.S. ___
104:
92:
79:Samuel Alito
56:
53:John Roberts
50:
39:
37:
30:
24:
15:
2370:Other lists
2311:Immigration
2291:Arbitration
2098:(1986–2005)
2092:(1969–1986)
2086:(1953–1969)
2080:(1946–1953)
2074:(1941–1946)
2072:Stone Court
2068:(1930–1941)
2062:(1921–1930)
2056:(1910–1921)
2054:White Court
2050:(1888–1910)
2044:(1874–1888)
2042:Waite Court
2038:(1864–1873)
2036:Chase Court
2032:(1836–1864)
2030:Taney Court
2026:(1801–1835)
2020:(1789–1800)
1782:opinion in
1765:opinion in
1748:opinion in
1733:opinion in
1245:F. Supp. 2d
881:No. 2130683
557:§ 1988
136:53 A.3d 361
128:Md. Cir. Ct
87:Elena Kagan
2412:Categories
2334:Trademarks
2296:Bankruptcy
2060:Taft Court
1901:per curiam
1899:2015 term
1820:October 3,
1803:References
1780:per curiam
1763:per curiam
1746:per curiam
1731:per curiam
1581:Citations:
1501:Fed. Appx.
1480:Citations:
1355:Citations:
1249:W.D. Penn.
1232:Citations:
1118:E.D. Mich.
1105:Citations:
995:Citations:
962:Under the
919:§19–8–5(a)
879:); rev'd,
860:Citations:
748:Citations:
630:Citations:
521:Citations:
391:Citations:
253:Citations:
158:(Md. 2014)
111:Citations:
40:per curiam
32:per curiam
2324:Copyright
1957:Sotomayor
1868:2016 term
1863:2014 term
1497:C.D. Cal.
1368:C.D. Cal.
899:5511249 (
643:C.D. Cal.
410:; rev'd,
366:a dissent
270:N.D. Tex.
268:4017124 (
2361:Taxation
2356:Military
2286:Abortion
1942:Ginsburg
1903:opinions
1685:See also
1505:9th Cir.
1380:9th Cir.
1132:6th Cir.
1016:N. E. 3d
651:9th Cir.
416:6th Cir.
408:W.D. Ky.
278:5th Cir.
38:Because
2329:Patents
1932:Kennedy
1920:Roberts
1870: →
1861:←
1679:Simmons
1325:of the
1257:3d Cir.
582:FindLaw
322:FindLaw
286:en banc
192:Jusstia
142:2012);
1947:Breyer
1937:Thomas
1926:Scalia
1646:Justia
1642:·
1640:
1535:Justia
1531:·
1529:
1425:Justia
1421:·
1419:
1393:
1374:, 803
1302:Justia
1298:·
1296:
1270:
1181:Justia
1177:·
1175:
1149:
1126:, 800
1061:Justia
1057:·
1055:
944:Justia
940:·
938:
809:Justia
805:·
803:
697:Justia
693:·
691:
649:1026 (
578:·
576:
555:
540:1171 (
456:Justia
452:·
450:
318:·
316:
188:·
186:
1962:Kagan
1952:Alito
1702:Notes
1644:
1604:595 (
1602:P. 3d
1555:Dixon
1533:
1503:148 (
1423:
1382:2015)
1378:412 (
1376:F. 3d
1300:
1255:422 (
1253:F. 3d
1247:576 (
1179:
1134:2015)
1130:737 (
1128:F. 3d
1059:
1022:2015)
1020:Mass.
1018:688 (
942:
807:
695:
647:F. 3d
580:
544:2015)
542:Idaho
538:P. 3d
454:
418:2015)
320:
276:712 (
274:F. 3d
190:
144:cert.
2270:2024
2265:2023
2260:2022
2255:2021
2250:2020
2245:2019
2240:2018
2235:2017
2230:2016
2225:2015
2220:2014
2215:2013
2210:2012
2205:2011
2200:2010
2195:2009
2190:2008
2185:2007
2180:2006
2175:2005
2170:2004
2165:2003
2160:2002
2155:2001
2150:2000
1822:2016
1627:----
1606:Ariz
1516:----
1455:Ylst
1406:----
1283:----
1162:----
1042:----
925:----
901:Ala.
790:----
678:----
655:U.S.
563:----
488:and
437:----
303:----
173:----
150:18 (
148:A.3d
25:The
1718:In
773:La.
344:to
152:Md.
2414::
1813:.
1596:,
1329:.
1203:.
1145:;
1033:;
914:;
897:WL
893:WL
875:,
767:,
725:.
498:.
429:,
266:WL
130:,
85:,
81:,
77:,
73:,
69:,
65:,
2137:)
2131:(
1996:e
1989:t
1982:v
1853:e
1846:t
1839:v
1824:.
1792:.
1775:.
1758:.
1741:.
1726:.
1401:)
1397:(
1278:)
1274:(
1157:)
1153:(
883:(
673:)
414:(
138:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
