Knowledge

2013 Regina wastewater plant financing referendum

Source đź“ť

222: 19: 209:
On the night the Results were posted, Regina Mayor Michael Fougere said ""I'll just say that the people have spoken and the people are always right. I'm very proud of the campaign we ran. I'm proud that people came out in large numbers to express their opinion on a very important issue for our city.
133:
During the campaign period, neither CUPE nor the Regina Chamber of Commerce disclosed how much they were spending on the campaign. After the campaign was over, it was revealed that CUPE had spent $ 180,000 on the "Yes" campaign while the Chamber had spent between $ 125,000 and $ 130,000 on the "No"
58:
was created in opposition to this move, and started collecting signatures to force a referendum on the issue. According to the Saskatchewan Cities Act, a referendum must be held if 10% of the municipality's population sign a petition to hold it. By the end of June 2013, the group had amassed 24,000
129:
The Canadian Union of Public Employees gave significant funds to Regina Water Watch, including registering their domain name reginawaterwatch.com, and paying for the report "Flushing money away: Why the Privatization of Wastewater Treatment Plant is a bad idea", which estimates that a P3 funding
59:
signatures, above the 19,310 required by law. However, the city clerk's report judged the petition was insufficient to force the referendum after ruling that over 4000 of the signatures were invalid. The city council decided to vote for the referendum to be held anyway.
83:
The "Yes" side was led by Regina Water Watch, group which self-described as "a citizens’ coalition who are concerned about the privatization of Regina's water and wastewater system". Their coalition "includes community activists, the
114:
expressed support for the goal of the campaign in an op-ed entitled "Why I’m giving Regina $ 58.5 million", in reference to his government's promise of funding part of the costs of the plant if the P3 option was selected.
213:
Jim Holmes reacted to the results by saying "I think we were more optimistic than that going into it. We were up against very tough competition. We were outspent and vilified and everything else."
71:"Be it resolved that the council of the City of Regina publicly finance, operate and maintain the new wastewater treatment plant for Regina through a traditional Design, Bid, Build (DBB) approach." 492: 130:
scheme would cost the city $ 61 million more than a DBB. The Regina Chamber of Commerce also participated in the campaign by paying for numerous newspaper and TV ads advocating for the "No side".
126:
The City of Regina spent a total of $ 408,594.96 towards the "No" campaign. Other campaigns and third party groups were not required by law to reveal their campaign expenditures.
423: 54:
The campaign to call this referendum started in response of a vote by the city council to finance the new $ 224-million Wastewater plant through a P3. A group called
384: 516: 357: 284: 445: 466: 575: 633: 560: 39: 253: 618: 398: 93: 236:
By 2016, the facility was nearly built, at a lower than forecasted cost, and it was deemed fully operational by 2018.
46:(DBB) approach. The result was 57% against the DBB approach, and the treatment plant ended up being financed by a P3. 623: 229:
A P3 model funded the construction of the city's new wastewater treatment plant. In 2015, the Edmonton-based company
376: 324: 27: 493:"Wastewater Treatment Plant Referendum September 25, 2013: Official Summary of Results and % Turnout by poll" 302: 221: 628: 603: 534: 38:
on September 25, 2013. The issue of the referendum was whether the facility would be financed through a
108: 96:(CUPE), which helped organize the group's first meeting. The leader of the campaign was Jim Holmes. 43: 92:
21, Making Peace Vigil and Clean Green Regina". The campaign was also supported by the national
118:
A debate on the referendum issue was held between Fougere and Holmes on September 18, 2013.
85: 31: 8: 100: 446:"Flushing money away: Why the Privatization of Wastewater Treatment Plant is a bad idea" 18: 254:"Le collectif Regina Water Watch dépose sa pétition à l'hôtel de ville de Regina" 230: 104: 612: 107:. The campaign was also supported by the Regina Chamber of Commerce. Federal 75:
The question used the same wording that the original petition had proposed.
111: 35: 310: 576:"Construction troubles plagued Regina's wastewater treatment plant" 561:"Cost of Regina wastewater plant comes in $ 6M less than expected" 517:"Referendum results in: P3 model to fund Regina sewage plant" 225:
Sign at the entrance of the Regina Wastewater Treatment Plant
89: 358:"Union, Chamber mum on Regina referendum spending details" 233:
was selected to design, build and operate the facility.
399:"Few fireworks in waste water treatment plant debate" 285:"Regina to hold referendum on sewage treatment plant" 325:"L'indépendance de Regina Water Watch mise en doute" 143:2013 Regina Referendum on Wastewater Plant Results 610: 467:"Campaign costs revealed in Regina referendum" 535:"Epcor to operate Regina's wastewater system" 604:Behind the numbers: P3 or No Federal Funding 67:The Referendum question was the following: 443: 374: 220: 17: 611: 377:"Why I'm giving Regina $ 58.5 million" 511: 509: 387:from the original on August 31, 2013. 352: 350: 348: 346: 279: 277: 275: 331:(in Canadian French). July 24, 2013 260:(in Canadian French). June 20, 2013 121: 13: 573: 506: 94:Canadian Union of Public Employees 14: 645: 597: 375:Flaherty, Jim (August 16, 2013). 343: 272: 99:The "No" campaign was run by the 22:Regina wastewater treatment plant 210:I'm very proud of the results." 103:, and its main leader was Mayor 26:A city-wide referendum on a new 634:September 2013 events in Canada 567: 553: 527: 485: 459: 444:Mackenzie, Hugh (May 6, 2013). 437: 416: 391: 368: 317: 295: 246: 28:waste water treatment facility 1: 239: 216: 7: 619:Referendums in Saskatchewan 204: 78: 62: 49: 10: 650: 137: 40:Public-private partnership 624:2013 elections in Canada 539:The Council of Canadians 226: 73: 23: 523:. September 25, 2013. 502:. September 25, 2013. 364:. September 24, 2013. 224: 69: 21: 629:2013 in Saskatchewan 563:. December 20, 2016. 473:. September 27, 2013 86:Council of Canadians 42:(P3) or through the 329:ICI.Radio-Canada.ca 258:ICI.Radio-Canada.ca 144: 307:Regina Water Watch 227: 142: 56:Regina Water Watch 24: 313:on July 31, 2013. 202: 201: 641: 591: 590: 588: 586: 571: 565: 564: 557: 551: 550: 548: 546: 531: 525: 524: 513: 504: 503: 497: 489: 483: 482: 480: 478: 463: 457: 456: 450: 441: 435: 434: 428: 420: 414: 413: 411: 409: 395: 389: 388: 372: 366: 365: 354: 341: 340: 338: 336: 321: 315: 314: 309:. Archived from 299: 293: 292: 291:. July 22, 2013. 281: 270: 269: 267: 265: 250: 145: 141: 122:Campaign finance 109:finance minister 88:Regina Chapter, 44:design-bid-build 649: 648: 644: 643: 642: 640: 639: 638: 609: 608: 600: 595: 594: 584: 582: 572: 568: 559: 558: 554: 544: 542: 533: 532: 528: 515: 514: 507: 495: 491: 490: 486: 476: 474: 465: 464: 460: 448: 442: 438: 426: 422: 421: 417: 407: 405: 397: 396: 392: 381:The Leader-Post 373: 369: 356: 355: 344: 334: 332: 323: 322: 318: 301: 300: 296: 283: 282: 273: 263: 261: 252: 251: 247: 242: 219: 207: 140: 124: 105:Michael Fougere 81: 65: 52: 12: 11: 5: 647: 637: 636: 631: 626: 621: 607: 606: 599: 598:External links 596: 593: 592: 574:Schick, Lisa. 566: 552: 541:. May 30, 2014 526: 505: 484: 458: 436: 424:"Expenditures" 415: 390: 367: 342: 316: 294: 271: 244: 243: 241: 238: 218: 215: 206: 203: 200: 199: 196: 193: 189: 188: 185: 182: 178: 177: 174: 171: 167: 166: 163: 160: 156: 155: 152: 149: 139: 136: 123: 120: 101:City of Regina 80: 77: 64: 61: 51: 48: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 646: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 616: 614: 605: 602: 601: 581: 577: 570: 562: 556: 540: 536: 530: 522: 518: 512: 510: 501: 494: 488: 472: 468: 462: 454: 447: 440: 432: 425: 419: 404: 400: 394: 386: 382: 378: 371: 363: 359: 353: 351: 349: 347: 330: 326: 320: 312: 308: 304: 298: 290: 286: 280: 278: 276: 259: 255: 249: 245: 237: 234: 232: 223: 214: 211: 197: 194: 191: 190: 186: 183: 180: 179: 175: 172: 169: 168: 164: 161: 158: 157: 153: 150: 147: 146: 135: 131: 127: 119: 116: 113: 110: 106: 102: 97: 95: 91: 87: 76: 72: 68: 60: 57: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 20: 16: 585:November 12, 583:. Retrieved 579: 569: 555: 543:. Retrieved 538: 529: 520: 499: 487: 477:September 1, 475:. Retrieved 470: 461: 452: 439: 430: 418: 406:. Retrieved 402: 393: 380: 370: 361: 333:. Retrieved 328: 319: 311:the original 306: 297: 288: 262:. Retrieved 257: 248: 235: 228: 212: 208: 132: 128: 125: 117: 112:Jim Flaherty 98: 82: 74: 70: 66: 55: 53: 36:Saskatchewan 30:was held in 25: 15: 403:Global News 154:Percentage 613:Categories 303:"About us" 240:References 134:campaign. 500:Regina.ca 431:Regina.ca 217:Aftermath 580:980 CJME 545:April 4, 521:CBC News 471:CBC News 408:April 4, 385:Archived 362:CBC News 335:April 4, 289:CBC news 264:April 3, 205:Reaction 181:Invalid 79:Campaign 63:Question 50:Petition 453:cupe.ca 195:49,033 176:57.08% 173:27,988 165:42.88% 162:21,025 148:Answer 138:Results 192:Total 187:0,04% 151:Votes 32:Regina 496:(PDF) 449:(PDF) 427:(PDF) 231:Epcor 198:100% 587:2023 547:2020 479:2020 410:2020 337:2020 266:2020 159:Yes 90:CUPE 184:20 170:No 615:: 578:. 537:. 519:. 508:^ 498:. 469:. 451:. 429:. 401:. 383:. 379:. 360:. 345:^ 327:. 305:. 287:. 274:^ 256:. 34:, 589:. 549:. 481:. 455:. 433:. 412:. 339:. 268:.

Index


waste water treatment facility
Regina
Saskatchewan
Public-private partnership
design-bid-build
Council of Canadians
CUPE
Canadian Union of Public Employees
City of Regina
Michael Fougere
finance minister
Jim Flaherty

Epcor
"Le collectif Regina Water Watch dépose sa pétition à l'hôtel de ville de Regina"



"Regina to hold referendum on sewage treatment plant"
"About us"
the original
"L'indépendance de Regina Water Watch mise en doute"




"Union, Chamber mum on Regina referendum spending details"
"Why I'm giving Regina $ 58.5 million"
Archived

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑