Knowledge

One-repetition maximum

Source đź“ť

105: 89:
between this weight and the next highest attempted weight. This type of assessment is considered the most accurate way to determine 1RM, and is considered safe when performed correctly. However, as adequate rest must be given between attempts, proper 1RM assessment may be very time-consuming if the initial weight is far from the 1RM.
993:
Compared to a formal 1RM test, the submaximal estimation method is safer and quicker. The estimate may not be accurate, but can be used as the starting point for a 1RM test. The formulas can also be used the other way, to calculate what weight is needed for a given repetition maximum, as a percent of
112:
The 1RM can also be estimated indirectly using repetition testing on submaximal loads, as popularized by the use of 1RM calculators. Although in many cases the estimate is reasonable, in other cases the estimate may vary by 10% or more from the actual 1RM. Using a specialized formula for the specific
986:
Of the formulas, the Epley and the Brzycki formulas are most commonly used. Epley and Brzycki return identical results for 10 repetitions. However, for fewer than 10 reps, Epley returns a slightly higher estimated maximum. For example, if a person can lift 100 pounds on a given exercise for 10 reps,
88:
Most commonly, 1RM is determined directly using trial and error testing. The participant lifts progressively heavier free weights, resting for several minutes between each attempt, until the maximum weight for which the participant can complete one full repetition is determined. The 1RM then lies
71:
One repetition maximum can also be used as an upper limit, in order to determine the desired "load" for an exercise (as a percentage of the 1RM). Weight training protocols often use 1RM when programming to ensure the exerciser reaches resistance overload, especially when the exercise objective is
117:
variables such as gender, age, height, weight, body fat percentage, and girth does not improve accuracy. Also, most formulas are for experienced weightlifters, and novices may find their actual one rep maximum is much lower because their nervous system cannot handle the stress of a high weight.
1172: 385: 987:
the estimated one rep max would be 133 pounds for both formulae. However, if the person were to complete only 6 reps, then Epley would estimate a one rep maximum of approximately 120 pounds, while Brzycki would return an estimate of approximately 116 pounds.
659: 979: 808: 539: 865: 709: 287: 52:
is the maximum amount of weight that a person can possibly lift for one repetition. It may also be considered as the maximum amount of force that can be generated in one maximal contraction.
916: 435: 250: 92:
Novices may find the procedure intimidating and unnerving, and be reluctant to add weight. There is also a risk of injury if a participant is unfamiliar with the proper form. A
583: 482: 1476:
Lesuer, DA, Mccormick, JH, Mayhew, JL; et al. (1997). "The accuracy of prediction equations for estimating 1-RM performance in the bench press, squat, and deadlift".
1405:
McNair, P.J.; Colvin, M.; Reid, D. (February 2011). "Predicting maximal strength of quadriceps from submaximal performance in individuals with knee joint osteoarthritis".
745: 276: 179: 159: 139: 77: 1503:
Campanholi Neto, José; Cedin, Luísa; Dato, Carla Cristina; Rodrigues Bertucci, Danilo; de Andrade Perez, Sérgio Eduardo; Baldissera, Vilmar (Jun 2015).
990:
Several more complex formulae have been proposed which use different coefficients for different rep numbers and sometimes even for different exercises.
1495: 60:
One repetition maximum can be used for determining an individual's maximum strength and is the method for determining the winner in events such as
1100: 1052:"Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Determining One Repetition Maximum Bench Press in Women Before and After Resistance Training" 594: 927: 756: 1245: 493: 380:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {36}{37-r}}={\frac {w}{{\frac {37}{36}}-{\frac {1}{36}}r}}\approx {\frac {w}{1.0278-0.0278r}}} 819: 670: 1132:"The 225–1b Reps-to-Fatigue Test as a Submaximal Estimate of 1-RM Bench Press Performance in College Football Players" 1457: 1031: 1349:
LeSuer, Dale A.; McCormick, James H.; Mayhew, Jerry L.; Wasserstein, Ronald L.; Arnold, Michael D. (November 1997).
876: 396: 1351:"The Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Estimating 1-RM Performance in the Bench Press, Squat, and Deadlift" 203: 1173:"Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry" 1050:
Mayhew, Jerry L; Johnson, Blair D; LaMonte, Michael J; Lauber, Dirk; Kemmler, Wolfgang (September 2008).
550: 446: 93: 1536: 1505:"A Single Session of Testing for One Repetition Maximum (1RM) with Eight Exercises is Trustworthy" 1316:
Naclerio Ayllón, Fernando; Jiménez Gutiérrez, Alfonso; Alvar, Brent A.; Peterson, Mark D. (2009).
121:
There are many formulas used to estimate 1RM using the submaximal method. In the formulas below,
720: 1489: 255: 108:
This chart compares the different formulas. The formulas greatly diverge after about 10 reps.
65: 1504: 31: 8: 17: 1430: 1372: 1298: 1261:
Kemmler, Wolfgang K.; Lauber, Dirk; Wassermann, Alfred; Mayhew, Jerry L. (2006-11-01).
1203: 1153: 1081: 164: 144: 124: 73: 1515: 1453: 1434: 1422: 1376: 1367: 1350: 1290: 1282: 1241: 1195: 1157: 1148: 1131: 1073: 1027: 1302: 1207: 1085: 1414: 1362: 1329: 1274: 1187: 1143: 1063: 1068: 1051: 1003: 49: 76:. By understanding the maximal potential of the muscle, it is possible to reach 104: 1530: 1519: 1315: 1286: 114: 1334: 1317: 1262: 1426: 1294: 1199: 1130:
Chapman, Paul P.; Whitehead, James R.; Binkert, Ronald H. (November 1998).
1077: 61: 1502: 181:
is a factor of each formula, so the unit of measurement doesn't matter).
1418: 1278: 1191: 1475: 1099:
Knutzen, Kathleen; Brilla, Lorraine; Caine, Dennis (August 1999).
1348: 1392:
Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, 2nd edition
1263:"Predicting maximal strength in trained postmenopausal woman" 1260: 654:{\displaystyle w(0.988+0.0104r+0.00190r^{2}-0.0000584r^{3})} 974:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{0.4880+0.538e^{-0.075r}}}} 1450:
The essential guide to fitness: for the fitness instructor
1049: 1024:
The essential guide to fitness: for the fitness instructor
803:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{0.522+0.419e^{-0.055r}}}} 80:
by increasing the number of repetitions for an exercise.
1129: 1101:"Validity of 1RM Prediction Equations for Older Adults" 534:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{1.0261e^{-0.0262r}}}} 1318:"Assessing strength and power in resistance training" 1171:
Reynolds, JM; Gordon, TJ; Robergs, RA (August 2006).
1170: 930: 879: 822: 759: 723: 673: 597: 553: 496: 449: 399: 290: 258: 206: 167: 147: 127: 1452:. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Australia. pp. 158–159. 860:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{0.951e^{-0.021r}}}} 704:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{1.013-0.0267123r}}} 1105:
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
1098: 973: 910: 859: 802: 739: 703: 653: 577: 533: 476: 429: 379: 270: 244: 173: 153: 133: 1394:. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. p. 395-425. 1528: 1404: 1441: 1026:. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Australia. p. 135. 30:"1RM" redirects here. Not to be confused with 1355:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1267:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1235: 1180:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1136:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1056:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1015: 1494:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 1447: 1389: 1225:. Lincoln, NE: Body Enterprises. p. 86. 1045: 1043: 1021: 911:{\displaystyle w\cdot \left(1+0.025r\right)} 430:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{1-0.02r}}} 141:is the number of repetitions performed and 1448:Marchese, Rosemary; Hill, Andrew (2011). 1366: 1333: 1238:A Practical Approach To Strength Training 1147: 1067: 1040: 1022:Marchese, Rosemary; Hill, Andrew (2011). 27:Maximum weight that can be lifted at once 161:is the amount of weight used (note that 103: 245:{\displaystyle w\left(1+r/{30}\right),} 113:exercise improves accuracy. The use of 14: 1529: 1221:Epley, Boyd (1985). "Poundage Chart". 1512:Journal of Exercise Physiology Online 1220: 1322:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise 24: 1469: 1111:(3): Vol 13, Issue 3, Page 242–246 25: 1548: 578:{\displaystyle w(0.9849+0.0328r)} 477:{\displaystyle w\cdot (1+0.033r)} 99: 1368:10.1519/00124278-199711000-00001 1149:10.1519/00124278-199811000-00010 83: 72:muscular strength, endurance or 1398: 1383: 1342: 1309: 1254: 1229: 1214: 1164: 1123: 1092: 648: 601: 572: 557: 471: 456: 96:can alleviate these concerns. 13: 1: 1407:Arthritis Care & Research 1390:Earle; Baechle, eds. (2000). 1009: 994:the estimated or actual 1RM. 1069:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b02ad 185:Formulas for estimating 1RM 7: 997: 10: 1553: 29: 740:{\displaystyle wr^{0.10}} 55: 1335:10.4100/jhse.2009.42.04 271:{\displaystyle r>1.} 1236:Brzycki, Matt (1998). 975: 912: 861: 804: 741: 705: 655: 579: 535: 478: 431: 381: 272: 246: 175: 155: 135: 109: 38:One-repetition maximum 976: 913: 862: 805: 742: 706: 656: 580: 536: 479: 432: 382: 273: 247: 176: 156: 136: 107: 928: 877: 820: 757: 721: 671: 595: 551: 494: 447: 397: 288: 256: 204: 165: 145: 125: 1478:J Strength Cond Res 186: 78:resistance overload 1223:Boyd Epley Workout 971: 908: 857: 800: 737: 701: 651: 575: 531: 474: 427: 377: 268: 242: 184: 171: 151: 131: 110: 1419:10.1002/acr.20368 1279:10.1519/R-18905.1 1247:978-1-57028-018-4 1192:10.1519/R-15304.1 984: 983: 969: 855: 798: 699: 529: 425: 375: 351: 345: 332: 313: 174:{\displaystyle w} 154:{\displaystyle w} 134:{\displaystyle r} 16:(Redirected from 1544: 1523: 1509: 1499: 1493: 1485: 1464: 1463: 1445: 1439: 1438: 1402: 1396: 1395: 1387: 1381: 1380: 1370: 1346: 1340: 1339: 1337: 1313: 1307: 1306: 1258: 1252: 1251: 1233: 1227: 1226: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1177: 1168: 1162: 1161: 1151: 1127: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1116: 1096: 1090: 1089: 1071: 1062:(5): 1570–1577. 1047: 1038: 1037: 1019: 980: 978: 977: 972: 970: 968: 967: 966: 938: 917: 915: 914: 909: 907: 903: 866: 864: 863: 858: 856: 854: 853: 852: 830: 809: 807: 806: 801: 799: 797: 796: 795: 767: 746: 744: 743: 738: 736: 735: 710: 708: 707: 702: 700: 698: 681: 660: 658: 657: 652: 647: 646: 631: 630: 584: 582: 581: 576: 540: 538: 537: 532: 530: 528: 527: 526: 504: 483: 481: 480: 475: 436: 434: 433: 428: 426: 424: 407: 386: 384: 383: 378: 376: 374: 357: 352: 350: 346: 338: 333: 325: 319: 314: 312: 298: 277: 275: 274: 269: 251: 249: 248: 243: 238: 234: 233: 228: 187: 183: 180: 178: 177: 172: 160: 158: 157: 152: 140: 138: 137: 132: 21: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537:Weight training 1527: 1526: 1507: 1487: 1486: 1472: 1470:Further reading 1467: 1460: 1446: 1442: 1403: 1399: 1388: 1384: 1347: 1343: 1314: 1310: 1259: 1255: 1248: 1240:. McGraw-Hill. 1234: 1230: 1219: 1215: 1175: 1169: 1165: 1128: 1124: 1114: 1112: 1097: 1093: 1048: 1041: 1034: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1004:Weight training 1000: 956: 952: 942: 937: 929: 926: 925: 890: 886: 878: 875: 874: 871:O'Conner et al. 842: 838: 834: 829: 821: 818: 817: 814:Naclerio et al. 785: 781: 771: 766: 758: 755: 754: 731: 727: 722: 719: 718: 685: 680: 672: 669: 668: 642: 638: 626: 622: 596: 593: 592: 589:Kemmler et al. 552: 549: 548: 516: 512: 508: 503: 495: 492: 491: 448: 445: 444: 411: 406: 398: 395: 394: 361: 356: 337: 324: 323: 318: 302: 297: 289: 286: 285: 257: 254: 253: 229: 224: 214: 210: 205: 202: 201: 166: 163: 162: 146: 143: 142: 126: 123: 122: 102: 86: 68:competitions. 58: 50:weight training 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1550: 1540: 1539: 1525: 1524: 1500: 1471: 1468: 1466: 1465: 1458: 1440: 1413:(2): 216–222. 1397: 1382: 1361:(4): 211–213. 1341: 1328:(2): 100–113. 1308: 1273:(4): 838–842. 1253: 1246: 1228: 1213: 1163: 1142:(4): 258–261. 1122: 1091: 1039: 1032: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 999: 996: 982: 981: 965: 962: 959: 955: 951: 948: 945: 941: 936: 933: 923: 919: 918: 906: 902: 899: 896: 893: 889: 885: 882: 872: 868: 867: 851: 848: 845: 841: 837: 833: 828: 825: 815: 811: 810: 794: 791: 788: 784: 780: 777: 774: 770: 765: 762: 752: 748: 747: 734: 730: 726: 716: 712: 711: 697: 694: 691: 688: 684: 679: 676: 666: 662: 661: 650: 645: 641: 637: 634: 629: 625: 621: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 603: 600: 590: 586: 585: 574: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 546: 542: 541: 525: 522: 519: 515: 511: 507: 502: 499: 489: 485: 484: 473: 470: 467: 464: 461: 458: 455: 452: 442: 438: 437: 423: 420: 417: 414: 410: 405: 402: 392: 388: 387: 373: 370: 367: 364: 360: 355: 349: 344: 341: 336: 331: 328: 322: 317: 311: 308: 305: 301: 296: 293: 283: 279: 278: 267: 264: 261: 241: 237: 232: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 199: 195: 194: 191: 170: 150: 130: 115:anthropometric 101: 100:Estimating 1RM 98: 85: 82: 57: 54: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1549: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1532: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1506: 1501: 1497: 1491: 1483: 1479: 1474: 1473: 1461: 1459:9781442510203 1455: 1451: 1444: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1401: 1393: 1386: 1378: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1345: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1312: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1257: 1249: 1243: 1239: 1232: 1224: 1217: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1186:(3): 584–92. 1185: 1181: 1174: 1167: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1126: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1095: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1046: 1044: 1035: 1033:9781442510203 1029: 1025: 1018: 1014: 1005: 1002: 1001: 995: 991: 988: 963: 960: 957: 953: 949: 946: 943: 939: 934: 931: 924: 921: 920: 904: 900: 897: 894: 891: 887: 883: 880: 873: 870: 869: 849: 846: 843: 839: 835: 831: 826: 823: 816: 813: 812: 792: 789: 786: 782: 778: 775: 772: 768: 763: 760: 753: 751:Mayhew et al. 750: 749: 732: 728: 724: 717: 714: 713: 695: 692: 689: 686: 682: 677: 674: 667: 664: 663: 643: 639: 635: 632: 627: 623: 619: 616: 613: 610: 607: 604: 598: 591: 588: 587: 569: 566: 563: 560: 554: 547: 544: 543: 523: 520: 517: 513: 509: 505: 500: 497: 490: 487: 486: 468: 465: 462: 459: 453: 450: 443: 440: 439: 421: 418: 415: 412: 408: 403: 400: 393: 390: 389: 371: 368: 365: 362: 358: 353: 347: 342: 339: 334: 329: 326: 320: 315: 309: 306: 303: 299: 294: 291: 284: 281: 280: 265: 262: 259: 239: 235: 230: 225: 221: 218: 215: 211: 207: 200: 197: 196: 192: 189: 188: 182: 168: 148: 128: 119: 116: 106: 97: 95: 90: 84:Measuring 1RM 81: 79: 75: 69: 67: 66:weightlifting 63: 53: 51: 47: 43: 39: 33: 19: 1511: 1490:cite journal 1481: 1477: 1449: 1443: 1410: 1406: 1400: 1391: 1385: 1358: 1354: 1344: 1325: 1321: 1311: 1270: 1266: 1256: 1237: 1231: 1222: 1216: 1183: 1179: 1166: 1139: 1135: 1125: 1113:. Retrieved 1108: 1104: 1094: 1059: 1055: 1023: 1017: 992: 989: 985: 193:1RM Formula 120: 111: 91: 87: 70: 62:powerlifting 59: 45: 41: 37: 36: 74:hypertrophy 42:one-rep max 1484:: 211–213. 1010:References 1520:1097-9751 1435:205221382 1377:144001941 1287:1064-8011 1158:220562559 958:− 935:⋅ 884:⋅ 844:− 827:⋅ 787:− 764:⋅ 693:0.0267123 690:− 678:⋅ 636:0.0000584 633:− 518:− 501:⋅ 454:⋅ 416:− 404:⋅ 366:− 354:≈ 335:− 307:− 295:⋅ 252:assuming 1531:Category 1427:20890972 1303:12769411 1295:17194251 1208:17050039 1200:16937972 1086:22631870 1078:18714230 998:See also 715:Lombardi 1115:11 July 665:Landers 620:0.00190 441:Baechle 282:Brzycki 94:spotter 1518:  1456:  1433:  1425:  1375:  1301:  1293:  1285:  1244:  1206:  1198:  1156:  1084:  1076:  1030:  944:0.4880 922:Wathen 611:0.0104 567:0.0328 561:0.9849 521:0.0262 510:1.0261 488:Berger 369:0.0278 363:1.0278 1508:(PDF) 1431:S2CID 1373:S2CID 1299:S2CID 1204:S2CID 1176:(PDF) 1154:S2CID 1082:S2CID 961:0.075 950:0.538 898:0.025 847:0.021 836:0.951 790:0.055 779:0.419 773:0.522 687:1.013 605:0.988 545:Brown 466:0.033 391:Adams 198:Epley 56:Usage 48:) in 1516:ISSN 1496:link 1454:ISBN 1423:PMID 1291:PMID 1283:ISSN 1242:ISBN 1196:PMID 1117:2014 1074:PMID 1028:ISBN 733:0.10 419:0.02 263:> 190:Name 64:and 1415:doi 1363:doi 1330:doi 1275:doi 1188:doi 1144:doi 1064:doi 46:1RM 44:or 32:RM1 18:1RM 1533:: 1514:. 1510:. 1492:}} 1488:{{ 1482:11 1480:. 1429:. 1421:. 1411:63 1409:. 1371:. 1359:11 1357:. 1353:. 1324:. 1320:. 1297:. 1289:. 1281:. 1271:20 1269:. 1265:. 1202:. 1194:. 1184:20 1182:. 1178:. 1152:. 1140:12 1138:. 1134:. 1109:13 1107:. 1103:. 1080:. 1072:. 1060:22 1058:. 1054:. 1042:^ 343:36 330:36 327:37 304:37 300:36 266:1. 231:30 1522:. 1498:) 1462:. 1437:. 1417:: 1379:. 1365:: 1338:. 1332:: 1326:4 1305:. 1277:: 1250:. 1210:. 1190:: 1160:. 1146:: 1119:. 1088:. 1066:: 1036:. 964:r 954:e 947:+ 940:1 932:w 905:) 901:r 895:+ 892:1 888:( 881:w 850:r 840:e 832:1 824:w 793:r 783:e 776:+ 769:1 761:w 729:r 725:w 696:r 683:1 675:w 649:) 644:3 640:r 628:2 624:r 617:+ 614:r 608:+ 602:( 599:w 573:) 570:r 564:+ 558:( 555:w 524:r 514:e 506:1 498:w 472:) 469:r 463:+ 460:1 457:( 451:w 422:r 413:1 409:1 401:w 372:r 359:w 348:r 340:1 321:w 316:= 310:r 292:w 260:r 240:, 236:) 226:/ 222:r 219:+ 216:1 212:( 208:w 169:w 149:w 129:r 40:( 34:. 20:)

Index

1RM
RM1
weight training
powerlifting
weightlifting
hypertrophy
resistance overload
spotter

anthropometric
Weight training
ISBN
9781442510203


"Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Determining One Repetition Maximum Bench Press in Women Before and After Resistance Training"
doi
10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b02ad
PMID
18714230
S2CID
22631870
"Validity of 1RM Prediction Equations for Older Adults"
"The 225–1b Reps-to-Fatigue Test as a Submaximal Estimate of 1-RM Bench Press Performance in College Football Players"
doi
10.1519/00124278-199811000-00010
S2CID
220562559
"Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry"
doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑