Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Valereee

532:

a summary of all human knowledge, but I guess bios are what other editors are writing. Or at least that's what they're submitting to us. That doesn't seem to have changed much in the ten years since that guideline was written. And I’m fine with US-oriented articles, but again up to half seems very high; it looks like in 2015 we changed our guidelines from ‘roughly half’ to ‘up to half’ of hooks in a set could be US-related because US hooks had become less prevalent. I’d say that trend is continuing; I think we’re probably at two or three US-related hooks in most sets, depending on how you assess them. (For instance, a hook about three women, one of them American, being inducted into a Canadian hockey hall of fame, with the hall of fame being the target article...does that count as a US-related hook for purposes of setting a prep? Such are the things promoters at DYK think about.) But I love it when I see something really different come over the transom.

252:

if there’s any chance I was even slightly in the wrong, and if I lose a debate or a third opinion goes against me I can move on, though I might take the article off my watch list if it’s something that’s going to continue to bother me. I try really hard to understand others’ points of view, even when they’re behaving badly, and I’ve found that when I respond to someone who is behaving badly by not escalating, often they’ll rise to expectations. This isn’t to say I don’t engage often in vigorous debate on talk pages or make the occasional salty remark, or that I’ve never made a bad decision when dealing with conflict. But most often the conflict I’ve had with other editors tends to take the form of long discussions on talk pages. I’m aware that these tools would increase the likelihood of conflicts not easily resolved by simple discussion.

171:

category: things I’d be happy to do as long as figuring out how to do it without breaking anything seems likely. In general one of the things I love most about WP is its collaborative & generally collegial nature. I’d like to be able to help content contributors just trying to keep their heads down and get on with their work deal with disruption, or respond to other requests for assistance. I would genuinely enjoy being someone people could ask for help. To me this feels like collaboration. My primary goal is to contribute in ways that don’t cause more work for others but instead make others’ volunteer hours more effective.

2371:. Valereee is a good writer and has contributed some good articles. I like her calm temperament which I think is an important quality for an administrator. I also see good communications and a willingness to help others on her talk pages. I am impressed by her recent work at DYK and willingness to help in new areas. I have not had a DYK for more than a year but the last time I did I saw that there were backlogs and delays. More administrators (and others) helping out there always seem to be needed. I think she has done enough to show familiarity with policies. She has established trustworthiness and I support her candidacy. 5785:'s opposition and their rational above. However, I will admit that I find the timing to be inopportune given recent and ongoing events and I don't feel comfortable directly participating in an RfA in the present circumstances. These are difficult days for the community and we all have to act in obedience to our respective consciences. For now, mine is telling me to sit out RfAs until the current unpleasantness is resolved. That said, I bow in respect to all of my fellow editors regardless of where you stand and I particularly thank the candidate for stepping up. - 1457:- From my personal experience: Great with newbies, I mean really great; Goes above and beyond to assist; Pleasant to interact with. Therefore, have no reason to doubt when others attribute other correlative characteristics that I would want in all admins- good temperament, politeness, carefulness, kindness, (most of all) AGF. Nominated/supported by people I've come to know to have good judgement. More focused on making useful contributions than racking up edit counts, as far as I can tell. Commendable edit summary stats. Finally, I have come to appreciate 5928:). It now seems the strength, and integrity, of their gesture has been heard, and we all now await the rresponse. While waiting, I think giving my fellow Wikipedians my answer to a question they have spent years building up to (+decade in both cases), to be a good use of time; it shows that none of the craziness has lessened what it means to be a Wikipedian (something the WMF are still learning), and our respect for one another. For this project to have a future, it needs that respect imho; otherwise, let the machines/WMF run it. 2846:. I've seen Valereee around at the main-page and errors boards, and in various other places, and find them a very competent editor, who will make a great admin. I will also go on record that I find the comments below, from editors I like and trust, quite unfortunate. Everyone's entitled to their view. But to criticise Valereee, even in neutral terms, for stepping forward and offering to take on the mop, just because of a political situation entirely unrelated to them, is not a good thing in my view. Whatever the rights and wrongs of 2265:– Excellent candidate, and well-liked + recommended by other experienced users above. Seems to be reasonably active recently, and Valereee is clearly familiar enough with Knowledge policies to take the next step to adminship. I also like quality of work that Valereee has contributed to this site thus far, and this user seems to be experienced enough. I understand the periods of inactivity in the past - family and work can definitely take a toll on other activities. Concerning any "Oppose" votes because of 218:, but not because I created it. I heard a story on NPR about a new archeological discovery, and I just jumped off a cliff writing it, and it immediately got tagged for notability, and another editor who’d come in to add the subject’s name in Chinese started pulling up Chinese sources. To me, this is the part of Knowledge I love the most: I took a chance and moved to article space before I was 100% sure, and another editor followed the thread, and we ended up with an article. I love that. I took 598:

body language to help us interpret one another’s intent. And our rules are confusing; we include ‘rudeness’ in our list of incivilities, but we’ve separately decided “Fuck off” is not necessarily uncivil. Unfortunately I think the answer to ‘how would you determine if something is a violation or not?” for most of us is “I know it when I see it,” and while that’s never going to be really satisfactory, I don’t know how we fix it.

5897:- the admin has to be seen to be a neutral arbiter. In some cases, timing matters. Valereee did have the ability to determine the timing of the RfA. In view of the spate of admin resignations, an RfA, rightly or (very likely) wrongly, can give the impression of trying to replace the departed. Some time to settle matters down (especially since there is potentially a resolution in sight) I think would have been prudent. 5924:. I hear you and respect your point. We, and Valeree (and Kosack), don't know when this will get sorted, and in what form, so the choice of timing is impossible for them. Many great admins/crats have handed back the tools, however, I consider their gesture to be more significant than that of a "strike", it was to show WMF how serious the situation had become (even Jimbo recognised this now on his talk page saying: 5998: 5143: 3293:(as an understatement) and quite possibly in poor taste. I would frankly advise/urge avoidance on those grounds as they are not productive in determining whether a candidate would make a good administrator. I recognize the view that a successful RfA now would diminish the impact/message that all the resignations have on the project, but adminship is - by definition - supposed to be 1773:

unfailingly calm and helpful. Their content creation relating to women's biographies and food is of an excellent calibre. They have a very positive attitude towards working with other editors, and it's lovely to see someone who approaches DYK and AFD with collaboration in mind; I have no doubt that valereee will put the tools to good use and treat adminship responsibly.

2697:. Trusted nominators, clueful contributions, civil demeanor. On a side note: Despite the current unpleasantness, I don't think one should be withholding support for reasons that have nothing to do with the candidate herself. Valereee is not to blame for the Foundation's current rampage wrt community self-determination and should not be penalized for it. Regards 325:, I'm more likely to find funny than to be personally offended by. I’ve occasionally run across someone who, it seemed, was just itching for a fight, saying things that clearly seemed intended to upset me or rattle me. I feel a lot more protective of other people. I don’t expect anyone to put up with harassment or bullying; it should just plain not happen. 2850:, we're primarily here to build an encyclopedia, and chasing Valereee away is not the best way to achieve that. It doesn't look like it will make any numerical difference, but I nonetheless urge those in the sections below to reconsider, and support the candidacy, unless there's something about the candidate themselves that needs review. Thanks — 348:

guidance I’m confident I can deal with it competently, and if I think I can do it without breaking anything, deal with the situation. If I feel it’s unlikely I can manage it well, ask someone else to manage it. If I make a mistake that I can’t fix or that I suspect I’ll simply make worse by trying to fix, ask for help.

3281:-- After reading the discussion, answers to questions, and supports from the above, I am comfortable putting my support behind this candidate. The opposes (as of yet) have not convinced me otherwise and I disagree (with the utmost respect) that timing should be reason enough for oppose under any circumstances. Yes, 565:

evade the question; it’s just that without having investigated how something is accomplished, I’m not sure whether a look at the instructions would make me think, “Oh, sure! I can do that!” or “Back out slowly, don’t look it in the eye, and don’t make any sudden moves.” I literally had the DYK noms : -->

5680:

You do not care to review the logs of the candidate, but instead comment on your perceptions of the motives of the two nominators - who happen to be among the best regarded contributors currently editing? I am certain the 'crat will give your comments its due worth, which is why I have taken the time

531:

Thanks, Nosebagbear. I’d love to see the mix continue to expand, basically in any way you can think of. It’s not that I have any complaint with the mix we’re dishing up right now; it’s what other editors are nominating. I’m not averse to bios; half does seem like a lot when you consider we're writing

461:

Thanks, Dolotta! My biggest weakness is anything technical. I’m thrilled with some of the bots and scripts and gadgets and forms available and can just about follow the instructions to install/use them and report glitches, but anything beyond that is the point at which I become incompetent. I have no

185:

gets nominated and I think it has more promise than the nominator thought it did (no disrespect meant to good-faith nominators; I’ve researched multiple AfD’d articles and ended up ultimately in agreement with the nom, but it’s fun to see if I can find sources that will go to proving notability for a

5827:

Point taken, but as per my response to SN54129 above (and on the Kosack RfA), even in wartime, people get married and babies are born; I don't think it is fair to blame Valereee for the WMF's actions. Even if WMF tell us all to "get stuffed" post the ArbCom letter, and everybody leaves and Knowledge

1566:

well-qualified candidate. I have some burnout concerns due to the candidate's activity on-wiki being confined to two relatively short spurts of activity, however, the break in the middle is well explained, adminship is not a big deal, and I'd rather have this candidate available to help out with our

564:

Thanks, OlEnglish. Grunt work doesn’t scare me. Technical might, depending on exactly what it means/involves. I no longer consider myself a fast study. I can follow instructions, but I no longer am able to commit those instructions to memory in one go the way I could when I was 28. I’m not trying to

494:

Thanks, PBS. It's an accept I wouldn't make now, as I'm more familiar with that particular MOS issue and would have recognized it as an incorrect edit. The policy is that pending changes is to prevent vandalism, BLP vios, and copyright vios, not to prevent good-faith but incorrect edits, but I don't

293:

Between 2016 and 2018, we sold a house we’d been in for 17 years, moved to a rental, bought a small elderly house, put on an addition that doubled its size, moved from the rental into the new place, and renovated the rest of it while living there. I didn’t edit much; if I did see a gnomish edit that

251:

I actually think possibly my strongest qualification is temperament. I’m hard to offend (you have to be actively trying to offend me, and even then I’m more likely to find it funny than to become upset). I assume good faith probably to a fault, my patience might actually be 98th %ile, I’ll apologize

186:

subject.) In general assessing arguments to determine consensus/no consensus feels like collaboration to me, whether at AfD or other collaborative debate areas. I’d also like to help with refund to userspace for those who think they’d like to try to keep working on a deleted article without pressure.

2981:

very longterm experienced and uncontentious member of the community. Among other things i have checked her deleted contributions and am not concerned by them. I had advised people not to run during the current crisis, but am reassured that at least in this case the crisis is leading some to abstain

2780:

I understand the concern of the opposes and the neutrals, and to some degree share them. Is this really a good time to run for adminship? But on the other hand this is a good candidate, and, this being a large volunteer community, not everyone can be expected to be aware of everything that goes on.

347:

Thanks, JMW! I’d deal with an unfamiliar situation entailing admin tools the same way I deal with an unfamiliar situation that doesn’t involve them now: Do the reading, if necessary ask for guidance from someone I know to be well-intentioned and experienced, assess whether after the reading and the

4881:

and has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with this editor's competence or trustworthiness to take up the mop; the honourable approach would have been for dissenting editors to have made them in the 'neutral' section, in my view. I have had a number of contacts with this editor, and they have my

597:

Hey, RoySmith! I think civility and what violates the civility policy might be the hardest of our policies to really define and to deal with. It varies by culture, it’s often contextual, and it’s complicated by the fact that when we’re interacting online we can’t use vocal tone, facial expression,

406:

ditto, and anywhere any of those pointed at, looking for advice specific to or generalizable to ANI. There are likely others I’d find with more time and research. Once I’d exhausted all of that, I’d likely be asking one the regular closers there to point me at other reading, and once I’d exhausted

226:

and took it to GA, and I’ve created quite a few articles that I’ve taken to DYK. I’m also quite proud of all the gnomish work I’ve done over many years now. I’ve fixed a lot of typos and grammatical errors and made a lot of small rewordings to improve clarity or reduce awkwardness, and I feel this

129:

highly enough. She has excellent skills writing and researching articles. She stays calm and cool when making her arguments on Knowledge and she communicates well with other editors. I've been so impressed with her research! There are times that I'm going to look for a reference for an article and

6135:

pretty much per Ad Orientem - Valereee sounds like an excellent candidate however due to the FRAM issues right now I cannot support any RFA, It's a shame these weren't held off a few months once the dust had settled, If it helps in any way if the FRAM thing didn't exist I would've 110% supported,

4352:

is a wonderful thing to see (not merely technical, but picking up new areas). I'm barely DYK-initiated, so I can't ask any hard-pitched questions on the area. Other activity looks fine - clear net positive in lieu of evidence to the contrary. Specifically - if you think Admin activity/recruitment

2622:

I have conducted a thorough review of the candidate's recent-ish DYK work. I have misgivings about the DYK process. But if we are to retain the process we need a strong coterie of capable main-page editors, read administrators, to deal with it. On my review of contributions I saw the occasional

170:

One of the areas that often makes me think "wish I could help" is DYK. I’ve often watched the hours tick by with five or six full preps and zero full queues and wished I could help; simple nagging doesn’t feel at all helpful. There are likely other tasks at Admin backlogs that fall into the same

5871:

Getting married and having babies wasn't an issue in any war I can recall. What's going on now, directly touches on how we operate and the relationship between the community and the WMF, which in turn touches on adminship. If it's over by next Friday, assuming a positive outcome, then I will be

4421:

Amakuru. Oh, good choice, random number generator! I agree that the opposition based on what unrelated third parties are up to is, to put it mildly, stupid. Candidate has good answers to the questions, demonstrated history of dedication to the project, no significant drama, and knows their weak

1772:

and this really did strike me when looking through some of their contributions. An excellent temperament is, in my opinion, far and away the most important quality an admin can have. Looking at their discussions with editors—some hostile, some impolite and some co-operative—it seems valereee is

607:

If I saw something that looked to me like incivility, my first step would be to post to user talk with a diff and an opening bid. Depending on the level of incivility and whether it’s a habit with that editor, that might be anything from, “Hey, EditorX, I'm wondering if maybe you might not have

4603:

Support - Out of good faith, I reviewed the handful of Oppose votes provided so far and they seemed like relatively minor issues that I personally do not see as rising to the level of not being admin-worthy. I understand that there are some important political issues going on with the platform

414:

Perfectly satisfactory thanks. I would just urge caution on which of the regular closers you take advice from. There is a tendency to shutdown valid discussion prematurely, in particular those related to Admin. actions or those of long-established editors. In the Giant Snowman Arbcom case, AC

180:

I’d like to be able to help more at AfD, which actually feels very collaborative to me. Sometimes I think for a poorly-sourced article with promise, an AfD nomination can be very productive for that article, and if handled well can also be really helpful for newer editors who have an article

5319:

In my limited interactions with the candidate, they have shown poise and good temperament. My research of their contributions shows the same result and great content contributions/collaborative efforts. I think this all-around editor would be a net positive to the encyclopedia. No concerns.

5968:. I know the candidate. If this was in different circumstances, i would have supported/will support. But currently, i cant. It is my humble suggestion to withdraw nomination, and run the RfA after current issues are resolved. But thats just my opinion. Still, i am firmly neutral though. — 2925:

In tumultuous times, leaders emerge through adversity. I have the utmost respect for those that have chosen to give up their added duties recently. But, I believe that the saying "Next one up!" rings true here. This candidate checks all of the boxes as a net+ for the project.

608:

realized this was a very new editor you were talking to here, can you tell me what’s going on?” to “You’re calling names in this edit summary again. You’ve been asked to stop doing this on five separate occasions. Each time, you’ve agreed you would stop. What’s going on?”

5802:

I entirely agree with Ad Orientem - I don't feel comfortable supporting RfAs given the current crisis. Especially since one of the major symptoms of that crisis is adminstrator resignations. I don't think that it's worthy of an oppose, but the timing is inopportune.

566:

preps instructions hanging on the wall above my screen the first few times I did it because they wanted me to be working in two windows at the same time. If you’ve got a particular backlog in mind, or just want to suggest one, I’d be happy to take a look at those

4441:. The candidate seems to be one of the most competent out there. Not only does she participate in article creation (like DYK), but also is genuinely interested in helping out with more behind-the-scenes tasks as well. Even within this RFA, the fact that Valereee 104:

Having had more spare time recently to commit to the project, Valereee feels she's now in a position to be able to make use of the tools. We need some more sensible and compassionate admins who are good communicators, and hopefully this is a good example of one.

5510: 393:

Thanks, Leaky. ANI’s an area in which I have almost no experience, so I’d be starting from scratch. If for some reason I was needed for a closing at ANI I’d start by reading whatever I could find. I’d be reading through recent ANI archives and looking at

3297:

and to think that an RfX passing now would diminish the impact/message that all resignations have into perpetuity blows things way out of proportion. I also recognize that this comment will probably receive objections, but it has to be said somewhere.

4178:. Answers to questions sensible, has some audited content under their belt, and their participation in AfDs and WP-space discussions looks reasoned and thorough. I don't see drama in another part of the project as a reason to disqualify candidates. 261: 4393:: I can't find much of anything to justify opposition at this point, and admitting that one doesn't know is genuinely heartening to see (if only more persons would say so!). Setting aside the ongoing debate, I'm happy to support the candidate. 4131:

I fully understand the perspective of some in the Neutral section, in particular Ad Orientem and Fish and karate, i just happen to disagree; the opposes are just not convincing; and we can always use editors with a clue as admins. Happy days,

5401:

nyone seriously thinking of running for RFA or RFB would do well to wait a little while longer. I doubt anyone could run now without some questions relating to current events, and I suspect that there may be no answer that wouldn't lose some

97:. Looking through her talkpage, I can see plenty of examples of her being polite and welcome to anyone wanting to ask questions, and her general standard of conduct is excellent. More recently, I've seen her taking an active interest in the 5893:, I'm going to expand on my rationale a bit. Primarily, I'm not current ready to put in the time required to review an RfA, due to the WMF. However, there is more. Adminship is a role where appearances matter. That's the prime reason for 1160:, I trust Valereee and agree with a lot of the reasons mentioned in other support votes. In addition, I've noticed that DYK is often part of the admin backlog, so I see no reason to keep someone who clearly wants to help from doing so. 5872:

asking for the bit back next weekend. If it's still going on months from now, I will be long gone. In any event I don't want this to become a distraction so I think this is a situation where we are going to have to agree to disagree. -

3820:

Another candidate who seems refreshingly free of drama, and with a solid record of contributions. The oppose comment about "anyone associated with WiR is equally culpable for any of their comments" is irrelevant and deeply unwelcome.

2982:

rather than to oppose. So I'm with the candidate re the RFA, but emotionally and with respect to the WMF, I'm in the neutral section. I was tempted to describe this support as "moral neutral" but thought that might be confusing.

5655:. No judgement on merits and demerits of the candidate. Timing of the RFA suggests it has currrent crisis has been exploited with expectation that fears of losing admins will help. They did indeed and this RFA is going to pass. 214:, three not-even-redlinked women who were quite notable and influential in their field, women’s page journalism, which has really only been recognized as important by academics in the past eight or ten years. I’m thrilled with 5856:

Thanks AO, but that was what I meant about "even in wartime, people get married and babies are born". This affair may go one for months, or conclude by next Friday; regardless, I think we should give the candidates our views?

4298:– I am acquainted with your contributions at DYK and like your answers to the questions. I waited for a while before adding my support in order to see what the "opposers" would dig up, and I find their reasoning uncompelling! 4209:

adminds need the trust of the community and this candidate has it, unlike the ironically named T&S. I am not going to withold support for a worthy candidate just because I disagree with the actions of wanna-be autocrats.

86:) – Valereee is a stalwart of the encyclopedia. She's a no-nonsense, get on with the job type of editor and it shows in her work. She's interested in food and drink and has written several articles on the topic including the 3404:– I have to disagree with the opposing points. The Fram kerfuffle is one thing; this RfA is another. Regardless of who runs Knowledge, we need administrators, and I can't see anything wrong with Valereee becoming one. 5828:

becomes a version of Reddit, Valereee still deserves to know after their years of long service, whether they made the grade or not. That is all Valereee is asking, and I think we owe it to Valereee to give an answer.

3855:

after review. The candidate should be judged on her individual merits, for which she excels, and should not have to deal with oppose or neutral votes just because of an unrelated controversy elsewhere on Knowledge.

2802:- delighted to. I've had the privilege of working with the candidate a some, would gladly do lots more. Lots of CLUE, and from the get-go has shown exemplary dedication towards making this a better encyclopedia. 4997:

of FRAMBAN and its fallout. If longtime admins really feel the best thing they can do is resign their tools over this, then I say the sooner the better we get someone the mop who's willing to put that job first.

4163:

Specifically a candidate who is unfamiliar with the bearpit that is WP:ANI, and whose major concern seems to be allowing editors efforts to be properly and promptly promoted within the encyclopedia remit. Yes.

2247:, a clear yes. Good temperament, as others have stated, a look at her talk page shows clear and concise communication with other editors, and a levelheaded approach even if she doesn't agree with someone else. 5709:

I have no trouble with the "Timing of the RFA" nor do I agree with the comment on perceptions of the motives of the two nominators. We need good admins! I am thankful that these candiates have come forward. -

5114:

candidate! I don't think we've crossed paths before, but her articulateness and good judgment are very evident on this page, and a willingness to recognize one's own limitations is exactly what I want to see.

5110:. As I said at the other concurrent RfA, I have concerns about this myself, but I also realize that life goes on, so it's a real pleasure to see the candidate show clue about the situation. But anyway, what a 411:, I’d likely still be wondering if I really understood ANI closings well enough to meddle there and thinking there had to be someone more qualified. I’m sorry, does that even get at the gist of your question? 1461:'s viewpoint a bit more, since the last RfA. Am 100% certain that candidate is not a jerk/dick, has a clue and would not abuse their tools (to the point of over-caution). Total, unreserved, emphatic support. 682: 370:

Actually it’s related to the above: I hate it when other editors have to fix my mistakes. It’s made me cautious with learning curves and very appreciative of the kind patience of other editors when it does

676: 310:

I have seen you around, primarily at DYK, and will probably support regardless of the answer to this question and I hope that you don't take offense by it. One thing that gave me pause was when you said,

6115:

though not through specific fault of the candidate. It's just that now is not a good time to run for adminship, until the air clears. Be that as it may, it looks like this RFA will be passing anyway. --

524:

Within DYK there seem some perennial/ongoing discussions about should there be more/fewer biographical DYKs, a better geographical split etc etc. How would you like to see the "mix" change (if at all)?

4507:

and appreciate you sharing it with the world. :-) Also appreciate the work that you do moving the needle to have more biographies of women. Thank you for volunteering to do extra work. Sydney Poore/

6223:

I see that question 4 came "via email" but there is no indication of who asked it. We don't typically entertain anonymous submissions to RfAs. Could you elaborate on the source of this question?

5611:

unless and until FRAMGATE is sorted out. This is not the time to be discussing new prospects for adminship when it is evident the WMF clearly does not trust and is willing to star-chamber them. —

4767:– Like Orville, I have seen Valeree around in the Teahouse and the Help Desk, and have been impressed by her level-headed responses and her willingness to help – both great traits for an admin. – 3096:

Big yes from me. I've seen this candidate's collaboration with other users and I have no hesitations. Judging by the votes above, I have no reason to believe this candidate will abuse the tools.

4978:

this top-notch candidate whose nominators presented well-reasoned arguments in support of an experienced editor who will undoubtedly do the job with integrity, level-headedness, and panache. –

3418:

This should be judged on its own merits, not by other matters which have no relationship to the candidate. There's no evidence ofany problems with thecandidate, and much evidence of good work.

268:

per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

5542: 3285:

is big and unprecedented, but I would hope that the community would not let it impact any RfX nominations made in good faith and totally unrelated the events at hand. As has been said at

1618:– This is clearly a qualified candidate, and a review of her user talk page makes it eminent that she is a pleasure to work with and will be a pleasure to work with as an administrator. 415:

attempted to make a point, rather poorly, of cautioning against early close of ANI discussions where Admin. actions are concerned. As with many AC edicts, this has been largely ignored.

3289:, the majority of the community is probably entirely unawares and I imagine that not all admins know either (nor may ever). Questions related to the Fram controversy/incident would be 4043:- Changing my mind, struck out my neutral vote. Upon self-introspection, everyone else is right; there is nothing wrong with this candidate, and we need more good admins, not fewer.-- 2082:

I'm a newbie and not sure my support counts for much, but I'm bookmarking @valeree's interactions with Lee Siegel as a shining example of how to deal with an angry interaction on WP.

4873:(which I believe should be seen as of increasing importance in today's welcome and shifting climate of improving new editor interaction, retention and respect); and a contributor to 4641:

Great contributor and communicator, and I see no issues in regards to the areas they wish to apply the admin tools (and I appreciate the nominee's open recognition of their limits).

6161:

Uh, I understand how that feels, but something about that comes off as a bit arrogant, and I generally have difficulty supporting people if they come off as trying to be perfect.

5757:

arguing that Knowledge has a "sports problem" due to the gender gap existing in part as a result of sports biographies, which I find a completely misguided approach to content. --

2829:

After reviewing some recent discussions I can confirm that she is one of the nicest editors I’ve seen here. This is exactly the kind of person we want to represent the community.

3803:

I don't usually pile on supports when the outcome looks almost certian, but at present I'd like to see as many new admins as possible, and I see no reason not to support here. —

5392: 488:(June 2015). Do you still hold the opinion: "My understanding of pendings is that I'm not responsible for making sure good faith information is correct as to content or style"? 1362: 3722: 1141: 313:

I’m hard to offend (you have to be actively trying to offend me, and even then I’m more likely to find it funny than to become upset). I assume good faith probably to a fault

3995:- great candidate who would be an absolute net positive with a mop in hand, - adept enough so to just about overcome my hesitation to promote admins amidst present turmoil. 315:. Do you think that you will be able to effectively enforce our policies against bullying and harassment, if you are prone to finding things that attempt to offend funny? 5951: 3600:. But this is not a deal breaker since the candidate has indicated that these are not the areas she is interested in. overall, seems like a good candidate for the mop.-- 3229:

I'm surprised my mild comment has prompted such an aggrieved response, and yet I fail to see you engage in any tut-tutting about the misogynistic comments. Funny that.

5842:

Hi BF. I'm not objecting to the RfA. Just its timing. And unless I am seriously misreading their comment, I believe the same is true of Bellezzasolo. Best regards... -

5167:

I meant to do this days ago but it slipped my mind. You show good judgement, excellent communication skills, competence, and a level head. You'll make a great admin. —

245:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

5700: 5584: 5416:

I think it would be more difficult than usual for an RFA to succeed right now. At least some would vote against to keep faith with those who have given up their tools

5462: 3471:

Excellent candidate for the position... I fundamentally disagree with the opposes related to the Fram issue. This is about the CANDIDATE, not Fram and not the WMF.

6015: 5937: 5916: 5837: 5881: 5866: 5851: 796: 1041:'s oppose, in my opinion, the English Knowledge currently has an increased need for new administrators, and the candidate seems to be trustworthy and competent. 5719: 791: 5497: 5690: 130:

Valereee has already found and added the reference herself! I'm really glad that Valereee will have more time to devote to Knowledge and is ready to step up.

5555: 5536: 4755:, as I can't really see why you weren't an administrator ages ago. Helpful, kind, smart, and never afraid of being wrong. This is what we need in an admin. 5926:

making it clear (through strikes/retirements) that something is unacceptable is a totally respectable and useful way to move the needle in an important way

5781:

No opinion on the candidate though I am almost always favorably disposed to candidates supported by the nom. And I respectfully disagree with my colleague

5449: 3609: 2891:

it is always a pleasure to support a thoughtful editor who will can be trusted to use the extra buttons of the sysop toolset with wisdom and grace. Best,

554:

You've mentioned you'd like to help out at various collaborative areas of admin work, which is commendable. I'm curious which, if any, other areas of the

5108: 3710: 1007: 6124: 652: 434: 5755: 5565: 3244: 3224: 3207: 3180: 6262: 6244: 1304:: Clearly focused on content and with a great temperament. We must take every opportunity to recruit editors like Valereee as admins. More, please, 6196: 1144:

is satisfactorily resolved, I will support adminship for any editor in good standing who is nominated by an experienced editor in good standing. -

1006:- Experienced in a needed area (DYK), content contributor, always courteous, and has gained the respect of fellow Wikipedians. This will be great. 504: 157:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

3532: 3603: 6277: 1885: 2269:, I absolutely understand that this crisis is likely to affect RfAs at this time more negatively, but I think that any reason for opposing on 945: 1281: 6063:

Candidates can control the timing of their RfAs and in my opinion they should have waited. I cannot support in the current circumstances.--

1354: 139: 2624: 2526: 6234: 5329: 4939: 4579: 4536: 3704: 278: 5442: 2594: 2195: 1403:

Excellent long-time contributor, plus she's a knitter. Knitters are stable, sensible, creative, lovely people. MOAR KNITTERS FOUR ADMINZ

395: 235:, and I try to treat them with kindness and patience while still making sure their COI doesn’t affect the article, and I’m proud of that. 5248:. Not sure if I ever had a chance to directly interact with this user but giving them the tools would appear to be a net positive. Also 4877:. So what's not to like? I note that every single 'oppose' thus far (apart from one SPA which can be ignored) is related to the current 2998: 1449: 6295: 4861: 3396: 3077: 2492: 2294: 1760: 1247:. Know well from AfD. Has the technical competency and the even-temperment to be a good admin; and is also good fun to interact with. 6040: 5645: 4716: 4699: 3515: 2917: 2657: 1830: 1558: 924: 5753: 5751: 5430: 4970: 4930: 4106: 3479: 3358: 3341: 3273: 2794: 2411: 1998: 1728: 1256: 227:

kind of work is extremely valuable, and I’m proud of doing it. I’ve worked with a lot of COI editors, including hostile ones like at

6072: 5981: 5622: 5376: 4252: 4004: 3865: 3812: 3307: 2883: 2543: 2394: 2257: 2043: 2019: 1409: 1222: 998: 115: 5822: 5488:

Could you elaborate on how being a Women in Red member shows poor judgement? (Or tell me if I’ve just misinterpreted your comment)

5082: 4787: 4665: 4474: 3967: 3936: 3903: 3830: 3666: 3066: 2939: 2577: 2476: 2450: 1901:

From what I have seen (admittedly no that much - not my neighbourhood), candidate is knowledgeable, level-minded, and committed. --

1876: 1472: 1374: 1296: 1239: 1015: 876: 6055: 5794: 5483: 5345: 5240: 5007: 4905: 4385: 4370: 4184: 3886: 3496: 3379: 2636: 2617: 2091: 1688: 1665: 1601:

I've encountered this editor before and came away thinking she might already be an admin. No concerns about giving her the mop. –

1480:- I thought you already were an admin!! Your efforts at DYK have been a bonus to the project. Thank you for your service there. 1335: 1195: 932:

Is competent, has a clue and can be trusted. Have seen some of her DYK contributions and it's quite unlike the regular offenders.

152: 6089: 5124: 4891: 4759: 4730: 4454: 4433: 4409: 4324: 4307: 4219: 3637: 3048: 2838: 1943: 1546: 1432: 1169: 862: 403: 6204: 6170: 6149: 5742: 5294: 5212:. The timing could have been better but with the crisis over that's all water under the bridge. Qualified candidate. Good luck! 5159: 4985: 4804: 4771: 4613: 4595: 4442: 4340: 4201: 4035: 3987: 3950: 3847: 3775: 3687: 3584: 3091: 3014: 2900: 2772: 2509: 2363: 2315: 2074: 1743: 1648: 1032: 981: 62: 6187: 6106: 5359: 5311: 5221: 5180: 4682: 4633: 4562: 4514: 4155: 4138: 3758: 3741: 3649: 3618: 3446: 3163: 2689: 2673: 2560: 2380: 2239: 2140: 1811: 1711: 1610: 1073: 1050: 5099: 4821: 4747: 4495: 4290: 4081: 4052: 3920: 3795: 3140: 3031: 2956: 2859: 2741: 2725: 2159: 2123: 2057: 1918: 1893: 1841: 1593: 1489: 1115: 5675: 5277: 4953: 4236: 4123: 3555: 3528: 3463: 3410: 3085:: Solid, long-term contributor. A net positive to the project and we need more admins with common sense and thoughtfulness. 2758: 2332: 2220: 1792: 1529: 1506: 1132: 1096: 734: 639: 148:

Thank you, Ritchie333 and Megalibrarygirl, I accept the nomination. I have never edited for pay, and this is my only account.

5603: 5065: 4276: 3324: 2973: 2821: 2708: 1395: 1317: 5766: 5041: 4021: 3269: 3192:, if the community is forced to endure this kind of misogynistic trolling, then a little pettiness is entirely called for. 1987: 1964: 1867:- Very good contributor, particularly at DYK. I am satisfied by the answer to my question and fully support the candidate. 1859: 1576: 1104:. A competent, even-tempered editor with a clear need for the tools and strong content experience. Exactly what we need. – 844: 5947: 5261: 5204: 5049:; all indications show a competent and dedicated editor who would do further useful things for the project as an admin. ~ 4914: 4844: 3429: 2590: 2428: 2273:

are just ridiculous. Anyone qualified for this position deserves our support. If anything, we need more qualified admins.

1627: 1152: 964: 907: 3123: 2323:

Very level headed, good editing history. Basic qualification for any admin is would you trust them with the tools. I do.

2179: 2038: 1217: 430: 4934: 4869:

Reasonable AfD and Admin scores; a steady head and good temperament; has experience of supporting other editors at the

4661: 3437:

Solid candidate. Regarding the opposes (and even some of the neutrals), not everything has to revolve around Framgate.

2627:). But the overall evidence leads me to believe that the candidate will be a net-positive in that area of wikipedia. -- 2469: 1469: 94: 1673:. Looks good, and I don't think a controversy elsewhere on-wiki, unrelated to this candidate, is a reason to oppose. — 3375: 2607: 1684: 1191: 943: 341:

If you were placed in an unfamiliar situation that entailed the use of your admin tools, how would you deal with it?

228: 4738:

without any reservations or concerns for the candidate. I do sympathise with Ad Orientem's neutral position though.

646: 6229: 5553: 4428: 4404: 4227:

as meeting my minimum criteria and nothing put forth in opposition that appears directly related to the candidate.

3524: 1277: 860: 113: 33: 17: 5528: 3684: 3576: 3022:. Experienced and trusted candidate and hoping that she will support our bid to improve relations with the WMF. 2456: 2355: 1023:

While I don't know Valereee, they seem like a fine editor and make a compelling case for needing to be an Admin.

555: 5943: 2586: 786: 5325: 2522: 1707: 706: 632: 83: 6210: 5617: 5437: 4924: 4575: 4063:(But seriously, good responses to the questions. Seems level-headed and dedicated to promoting inclusivity.) 3792: 3718: 3700: 1913: 670: 399: 5418:"). Basically, let WP:FRAM blow over first; nothing personal of course. As the feller said, "it's business, 5568:

I think you might find her the sort of WiR participant who wants notable Women to be covered on Knowledge.

2290: 2192: 1635:

A highly qualified candidate. I have no problem with the timing. Thank you for stepping forward, Valereee.

1092: 933: 812: 5019:

brave enough to accept a nomination for adminship during the FRAMBAN incident would make a great admin. -

222:

from a pretty rough article to GA, and I’m working on taking it to FA; it’s at peer review now. I created

5575: 3580: 2989: 2816: 1444: 1382:- comes to the table with excellent references, and we certainly need good, level-headed administrators. 1273: 6276:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

5637: 4857: 3392: 2488: 1756: 1351: 6026:

Knowledge needs more admins. The WMF deserves fewer admins. Not voting but I wish the candidate well.

120: 6034: 5697: 5321: 4712: 4695: 3510: 2913: 2875: 2653: 2518: 1825: 1555: 989:

I find that whenever I see this candidate's edits on my watch pages ~ they have been edited properly

920: 822: 727: 426: 135: 5472:. The candidate shows poor judgement in the timing of this nomination and in her membership of WiR. 4690:

after checking logs, deleted content, this user is versed in the tools, and appears to be sensible.

4012:

I'm left with little choice but to do as vetting checks out and the opposes are best left untouched.

5994:, and Addy, I fixed the indents to make my vote #2. No violation of editing other's comment policy 5933: 5862: 5833: 5782: 5686: 5612: 5423: 4966: 4920: 4571: 4523: 4169: 4097: 3714: 3696: 3354: 3337: 3265: 3113: 2790: 2517:

Seems to be a net positive to the project as an editor, will likely be a net positive as an admin.

2473: 1993: 1724: 1252: 1038: 664: 101:

area of the main page, which is an area of the project where we're frequently starved for admins.

6068: 6006: 5972: 5372: 4000: 3861: 3809: 2539: 2188: 2033: 2014: 1819:. Solid long-term content contributor, calm temperament and good communication with new editors. 1392: 1209: 994: 760: 691: 614: 68: 5911: 5817: 5570: 5478: 5411: 5396: 5078: 4658: 3934: 3899: 3826: 3662: 3215:, I am happy to support Valereee for proper reasons. Trolling in response to trolling--sheesh. 3062: 2984: 2573: 2500:- Fine writer. Collaborative and level-headed over a long period of time. Ready for the mop. -- 2465: 2445: 1936: 1872: 1441: 1370: 1293: 1269: 1235: 1011: 872: 207: 4031: 781: 6052: 5877: 5847: 5790: 5633: 5235: 5003: 4853: 4591: 4445:

is a good sign of her level-headed demeanor, something that a lot of us don't have nowadays.

4382: 4366: 3881: 3492: 3388: 3371: 3073: 2632: 2612: 2484: 2274: 2087: 1752: 1678: 1661: 1187: 223: 5772: 5594:

I think we should hold off on all new RfAs until the WMF resolves the current FRAMBAN case.

3873:- displays competence and a suitable temperament for being an administrator. No concerns. -- 2568:

looks like a net positive to me, nothing sticks out that would cause me to think otherwise.

834: 776: 6085: 6028: 5738: 5641: 5551: 5493: 5120: 4887: 4726: 4708: 4691: 4503:

All around good contributor. Especially appreciate the work that you do at DYK. And I love

4450: 4400: 4320: 4303: 4215: 3732:

based on candidate's excellent editing and communication history. Thanks for volunteering.

3632: 3505: 3044: 2909: 2834: 2649: 1820: 1606: 1542: 1440:

an excellent contributor with an admirable approach to working with inexperienced editors.

1427: 1265: 1165: 916: 858: 720: 418: 364:

What is your biggest regret from your time on Knowledge, and how have you learned from it?

182: 131: 111: 5382: 3387:

great contributor, no issues at all as far as I can see, net benefit checkbox is ticked.

8: 6200: 6166: 5989: 5929: 5890: 5858: 5829: 5682: 5522: 5290: 5249: 4982: 4962: 4800: 4609: 4338: 4197: 4165: 4091: 3983: 3975: 3843: 3771: 3680: 3592:

would have liked to see more edits from the user. She is not an all rounder since only 4

3572: 3472: 3350: 3333: 3294: 3261: 2896: 2786: 2505: 2404: 2349: 2311: 2303: 2070: 1982: 1740: 1720: 1641: 1417: 1248: 1028: 977: 545: 356: 333: 6183: 6102: 6064: 5894: 5715: 5696:

Difficult to ignore the signature, teal and turquoise, thought I was getting glaucoma.

5458: 5368: 5307: 5217: 5174: 5131: 5073:

Always a calm, helpful, level-headed editor in AfD discussions, will be a great admin.

4678: 4628: 4558: 4511: 4246: 4151: 3996: 3857: 3805: 3754: 3737: 3442: 3299: 3237: 3200: 3156: 2869: 2687: 2669: 2556: 2535: 2389: 2376: 2266: 2249: 2234: 2136: 2108: 2104: 2028: 2009: 1701: 1405: 1204: 1066: 1046: 990: 887: 755: 702: 658: 626: 500: 422: 379: 232: 77: 58: 5395:(which your nominators should, frankly have noted and prepared you for); particularly 2203:- writes good articles, and I love the attitude that she doesn't take offense easily. 6120: 5921: 5898: 5804: 5667: 5473: 5095: 5074: 4878: 4816: 4780: 4743: 4651: 4645: 4604:

leadership but I don't think that they are necessarily relevant to an individual AFD

4489: 4465: 4071: 4048: 3959: 3927: 3916: 3895: 3822: 3788: 3658: 3454:-- solid candidate, with good contribution history and committment to the community, 3136: 3058: 3027: 2952: 2927: 2855: 2782: 2721: 2569: 2461: 2437: 2149: 2052: 1973: 1909: 1889: 1868: 1838: 1589: 1485: 1463: 1458: 1366: 1290: 1231: 1110: 868: 302: 4544:

Happy to support. Answers are satisfactory, contributions are good, --jerk, ++clue.

4027: 455:

What area or areas of the English Knowledge do you find yourself to be the weakest?

6049: 5965: 5873: 5843: 5786: 5599: 5339: 5302:

A solid candidate. Thanks for making yourself available; you make a great admin! -

5269:

No concerns. The timing of this nomination raises a few eyebrows but nothing more.

5231: 5154: 4999: 4949: 4900: 4874: 4504: 4379: 4362: 4232: 4179: 4119: 3874: 3550: 3488: 3459: 3408: 3367: 3366:

Can't really find a reason to oppose. Seems worthy enough to have the admin tools.

3332:

Not a perfect candidate, but looks completely worthy of some community investment.

3220: 3176: 2754: 2628: 2602: 2328: 2216: 2083: 1783: 1674: 1657: 1520: 1502: 1328: 1178: 1128: 1088: 915:

They have thousands of edits and have never been blocked, so they seem good to me.

514: 219: 90: 45: 5543:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Appeals_and_modifications

2947:

Went through her contributions and it did not take long for me to get convinced.--

817: 495:

think I worded my response to you particularly well, and I'm cringing a little. --

6224: 6218: 6081: 5762: 5734: 5546: 5504: 5489: 5337:

Don't have true reasons to oppose and Knowledge is in bad need of fresh admins.--

5116: 4883: 4838: 4756: 4722: 4446: 4423: 4396: 4316: 4299: 4271: 4211: 3626: 3320: 3040: 2969: 2830: 2812: 2703: 1929: 1538: 1421: 1386: 1313: 1305: 1161: 853: 588: 584: 485: 274: 203: 106: 2131:

demonstrates a calm, mature and levelheaded approach, and will use the tools. --

387:

What guidance is available to you as an Admin. in closing issues raised at ANI?

6162: 6137: 5515: 5419: 5286: 5148: 5028: 4979: 4796: 4768: 4605: 4587: 4354: 4334: 4193: 4016: 3979: 3945: 3839: 3767: 3676: 3597: 3564: 3286: 3282: 3086: 3005: 2892: 2847: 2768: 2501: 2342: 2307: 2066: 1957: 1854: 1737: 1636: 1572: 1515: 1024: 973: 541: 211: 6289: 6270:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

6254: 6179: 6098: 5711: 5454: 5354: 5303: 5257: 5213: 5198: 5168: 4993:

Beyond all the other respected contributors' arguments here, I am supporting

4911: 4674: 4624: 4545: 4508: 4147: 4134: 3750: 3733: 3657:

per above, and the opposition appears to be entirely for querulous reasons -

3646: 3593: 3438: 3425: 3230: 3212: 3193: 3168: 3149: 2682: 2665: 2645: 2552: 2424: 2372: 2229: 2132: 1804: 1697: 1623: 1602: 1148: 1059: 1042: 899: 622: 575: 496: 126: 98: 73: 54: 2340:. Might have not been the best time to run, but you'll do fine nonetheless. 6116: 5658: 5091: 4870: 4813: 4739: 4483: 4285: 4065: 4044: 3912: 3784: 3132: 3104: 3023: 2948: 2851: 2735: 2717: 2716:. I've reviewed her record and I believe she is more than fit for the job. 2173: 2117: 1903: 1835: 1585: 1481: 1105: 481: 447: 215: 87: 4361:

an admin - you should have resigned or stop pestering the new candidates.

5595: 5270: 4945: 4228: 4115: 3541: 3455: 3405: 3216: 3185: 3172: 2750: 2324: 2212: 1977: 1777: 1498: 1124: 1083: 4260:– a competent, pleasant, trustworthy editor. She'll be a great admin. – 3349:

Opposition is wholly unconvincing, and my review found nothing serious.

2733:

Trustworthy, well-rounded candidate who will be useful in needed areas.

5758: 5050: 4261: 3316: 2965: 2803: 2698: 2623:

case of a DYK article that I don't think should have been promoted (eg

1383: 1309: 6097:

She sounds great but now is not the time, as per User:Fish and Karate.

1926:. Excellent article contributions, and strong communication skills. — 6280:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

5020: 4707:

per Megalibrarygirl, strong in both content creation and discussion.

4013: 1952: 1849: 1568: 841: 5509:

WiR tweeted something controversial about Fram. See mid-way through

1203:

Glad someone qualified has put their hand up. No qualms whatsoever.

884:

Has pretty great AfD stats, and I don't see any immediate problems.

6249: 5253: 5190: 4831: 4114:. Valereee is a good and helpful editor in whose judgment I trust. 3420: 2644:

I'm liking her good-natured take on whimsical food topics like the

2420: 2388:, a check of edits looks good and nothing stands out as a problem. 1770:

I actually think possibly my strongest qualification is temperament

1619: 1518:

related oppose is concerned; something about babies and bathwater.

1145: 955: 894: 705:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 558:

you'd try to tackle that involve more technical 'grunt' type work?

470: 2749:

Some metrics I'd like to see are low but no red flags, NETPOS. --

712: 587:

problems? How would you determine if something is a violation of

5367:

Stellar candidate and there’s nothing substantial to object too.

3097: 2170: 2785:

issues will not be sorted out, I'll retire to make it even... --

1081:

Level-headed, polite, and reasonable. Definite admin material. —

5541:

Eric cannot reply here as he is topic banned from doing so per

3523:. Very good temperament and attitude. Should be a great admin. 3315:

No evidence they will misuse the tools or abuse the position.--

1554:

based on endorsements by several users who I think trustworthy

591:

or not, and if you decided it was, how would you deal with it?

181:

nominated. I actually get a nerdy thrill when an article like

6245:

Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Anonymous Questions in RFA

4462:-- a fine all-around editor with great communication skills. 2436:

per me learned colleagues above - I see no reason to oppose.

146:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

2551:- I can't see any reason not to trust them with admin tools. 1584:

very glad to see new volunteers coming forward at this time.

1346:

Much respect for Valereee for throwing her hat in the ring,

5564:

Dear Eric, if you look at the candidate's edits such as to

4795:- no concerns, seems helpful, would be an asset for DYK. -- 2115:

with fellow editors there, regardless of their experience.

2681:. Have seen her work, have consistently appreciated it. — 321:

Thanks, StudiesWorld, sorry, I meant an attempt to offend

6136:

Regardless of my vote I wish you the best of luck here. –

3695:

I see no reason to oppose, certainly not the Fram thing.

1951:- solid, tenured candidate; even-tempered and competent. 29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

196:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

164:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

6159:"I hate it when other editors have to fix my mistakes." 3487:: a trusted contributor; thank you for volunteering. -- 1497:

No reason to think this user would abuse the tools. --

5406: 4284:

excellent editor who will do a great job as an admin.

3131:-- I feel comfortable throwing my support her way. -- 1719:: a quality contributor who will make a quality admin. 1567:

backlogs. Frankly baffling oppose from Serial Number.

484:

and then looked up our interaction, of which there is

6195:- per Foxnpichu. Wishing the user the best of luck, 3171:, come on now. There is no need for this pettiness. 2419:- Haven't come across her but she looks fine to me. 287:

Can you explain why you were inactive in 2016-2017?

6080:Because of present circumstances onwiki & off. 4812:- seems like an excellent candidate for adminship. 2766:Great candidate, trustworthy, no reason to oppose. 5566:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Cornbleet 5545:, so there's no point prolonging this discussion. 1514:. A fine, mop-deserving editor. And as far as the 1058:Experienced and competent, is helpful and civil. 260:You may ask optional questions below. There is a 6287: 4899:Experienced; no major issues. It's a clear yes. 4852:. Seems to be a prolific and civil contributor. 4146:Definitely a solid candidate. Deserves the mop. 2006:and look forward to her joining the admin corps. 3260:per her satisfactory answer to my questions. – 1268:and has been in project since 2006 and a clear 4378:. Good history of contributions; no concerns. 728: 689:Edit summary usage for Valereee can be found 4443:is able to take negative judgment positively 2625:Template:Did you know nominations/Hu Peizhao 5995: 4089:- Make a friend when you don't need one.___ 2534:, no issues, the more moppers the better. 2065:- good candidate, competent and civil. -- 2027:Not a jerk, has clue, sounds good enough. 1800:Well qualified, always nice to work with. 735: 721: 396:Knowledge talk:Administrators' noticeboard 53:Final (231/8/12); Closed as successful by 4348:- the candidate's awareness of what they 1140:per my new criteria for adminship: Until 4522:Solid contributor with good judgment. – 2111:and have been impressed with Valereee's 701:Please keep discussion constructive and 404:Knowledge:Advice on closing discussions 231:and very well-intentioned ones like at 14: 6288: 4673:without any reservations or concerns. 3925:I endorse the nomination statement. – 4829:Experienced candidate; no concerns. 4570:No concerns, and DYK needs the help. 716: 462:aspirations to move into those areas. 5393:this discussion on the RFA talk page 5140: 1696:. good chance of being net positive 5399:from {{noping|WereSpielChequers) (" 2964:, a very good editor and candidate. 2187:, I don't see any reason why not. ♠ 1177:. We need more (qualified) admins — 742: 294:needed to be made, I didn’t log in. 23: 480:I came across this nomination via 24: 6307: 6296:Successful requests for adminship 5139:I don't see anything wrong here. 1537:Competent with good temperament. 1123:- per Ritchie333's nomination. -- 1037:For the same reasons that led to 840:Yes to this excellent candidate. 229:Talk:Lee Siegel (cultural critic) 5996: 5141: 2402:- seems like a good candidate — 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3766:experienced, qualified editor. 3713:is one more reason to support. 4078:needs to be running more often 953:Based on nominators' support. 13: 1: 2113:patience and good temperament 1656:. Fully qualified candidate. 400:Knowledge:Closing discussions 2867:net positive to the project. 2205:And I really don't like the 1751:Highly qualified candidate. 972:, do not see any red flags-- 7: 6048:per Fish and Karate. · · · 153:Questions for the candidate 10: 6312: 4244:a trustworthy Wikipedian. 2271:those grounds specifically 2228:- Writes tasty articles. 6235:23:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 6016:23:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5982:23:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5882:22:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5867:21:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5852:20:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5838:19:59, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5823:19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5795:18:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5463:20:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 5443:17:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 4961:with no concerns at all. 4422:spots. Happy to support. 4192:. Trustworthy candidate. 4181:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 3540:. No qualms or concerns. 1944:23:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1919:23:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1894:23:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1877:23:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1860:23:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1842:23:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1831:23:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1812:22:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1793:22:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1761:22:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1744:22:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1729:22:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1712:21:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1689:21:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1666:21:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1649:21:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1628:21:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1611:20:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1594:20:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1577:20:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1559:20:30, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1547:20:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1530:20:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1507:20:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1490:19:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1473:19:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1450:19:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1433:19:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1410:19:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1396:19:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1375:19:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1355:19:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1336:19:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1318:18:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1297:18:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1282:18:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1257:18:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1240:18:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1223:18:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1196:18:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1170:18:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1153:17:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1133:17:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1116:17:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1097:17:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1074:17:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1051:17:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1033:17:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1016:17:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 999:17:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 982:17:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 965:17:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 946:17:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 925:17:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 908:17:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 877:17:06, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 863:17:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 845:17:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 805: 769: 748: 574:Additional question from 539:Additional question from 513:Additional question from 469:Additional question from 446:Additional question from 378:Additional question from 355:Additional question from 332:Additional question from 301:Additional question from 273:Additional question from 140:22:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 116:21:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 6273:Please do not modify it. 6263:06:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 6205:08:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 6188:16:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 6171:14:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 6150:12:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 6125:19:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 6107:19:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 6090:18:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 6073:12:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 6056:11:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 6041:06:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5952:10:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 5938:22:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5917:21:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5767:23:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5743:18:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5720:13:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5701:14:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5691:21:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 5676:13:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 5646:07:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 5623:03:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 5604:21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5585:16:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5556:16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5537:15:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5498:15:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5484:14:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 5377:16:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5360:15:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5346:15:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5330:14:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5312:13:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5295:11:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5278:07:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5262:06:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5241:03:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5222:00:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5205:00:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5181:23:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5160:23:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5125:23:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5100:21:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5083:11:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5066:02:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 5042:22:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 5008:20:48, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4986:12:41, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4971:12:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4954:12:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4940:12:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4915:07:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4906:03:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4892:02:17, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4862:02:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4845:00:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 4822:22:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4805:18:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4788:18:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4772:18:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4760:16:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4748:15:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4731:13:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4717:13:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4700:13:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4683:10:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4666:07:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4634:04:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4614:03:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4596:01:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4580:01:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4563:01:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4537:01:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4515:00:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 4496:22:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4475:20:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4455:18:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4434:17:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4410:17:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4386:13:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4371:13:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4341:12:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4325:12:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4308:09:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4291:04:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4277:02:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4253:02:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4237:00:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 4220:23:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4202:22:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4185:22:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4156:19:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4139:19:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4124:18:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4107:18:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4082:17:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4053:17:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4036:17:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4022:16:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 4005:16:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3988:16:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3968:15:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3951:15:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3937:13:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3921:13:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3904:13:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3887:13:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3866:12:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3848:12:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3831:10:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3813:10:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3796:09:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3776:08:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3759:08:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3742:08:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3723:10:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 3705:08:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3688:07:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3674:I see no reason not to. 3667:07:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3650:06:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3638:05:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3619:05:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3596:edits and a few more to 3585:03:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3556:02:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3533:01:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3516:01:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3497:00:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3480:00:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3464:23:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3447:23:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3430:22:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3411:22:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3397:22:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3380:21:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3359:21:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3342:20:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3325:20:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3308:19:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3274:19:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3245:01:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 3225:00:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 3208:20:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3181:18:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3164:19:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3141:18:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3124:18:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3092:18:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3078:18:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3067:18:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3049:17:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3032:17:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 3015:16:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2999:16:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2974:16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2957:16:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2940:15:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2918:15:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2901:15:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2884:14:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2860:14:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2839:13:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2822:13:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2795:13:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2773:13:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2759:13:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2742:13:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2726:13:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2709:12:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2690:11:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2674:10:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2658:10:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2637:09:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2618:09:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2595:09:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2578:09:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2561:09:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2544:08:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2527:08:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2510:08:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2493:08:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2477:08:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2451:08:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2429:07:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2412:06:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2395:05:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2381:04:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2364:04:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2333:03:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2316:03:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2295:03:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2258:03:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2240:03:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2221:02:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2196:02:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2180:02:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2167:Thorough + thoughtful ~ 2160:01:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2141:01:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2124:01:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2092:01:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2075:01:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2058:00:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2044:00:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 2020:00:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1999:00:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1965:00:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1344:per Serial Number 54129. 867:Not a jerk, has a clue. 505:11:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 435:20:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 63:16:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 5188:and don’t F it up :) ! 4332:. Welcome aboard :) -- 583:How would you approach 38:Please do not modify it 6178:- per Fish+Karate. -- 5750:per recent statements 4779:– An excellent editor. 4757:IceKey8297 is awesome. 4621:per everything above. 3039:- trustworthy editor. 1274:Pharaoh of the Wizards 208:Dorothy Misener Jurney 206:(awaiting GA review), 93:, and is a regular at 5644:comment was added at 4315:Calm and coolheaded. 1884:no reason to oppose. 1768:: the candidate says 1325:Excellent candidate. 224:The Tempestry Project 34:request for adminship 5733:– Not the best fit. 5681:to respond instead. 5448:Discussion moved to 4944:per all of above. ‐‐ 2519:GreenLipstickLesbian 1266:User:Megalibrarygirl 818:Global contributions 620:Links for Valereee: 183:Yongfeng chili sauce 5783:Serial Number 54129 5391:unfortunately, per 5322:HickoryOughtShirt?4 5107:, partly per this: 5090:Seems well-suited. 4721:Yes, per Ritchie. 4572:Suffusion of Yellow 4353:should stop during 3715:Boing! said Zebedee 3697:Boing! said Zebedee 3148:per Eric Corbett. 2574:click to talk to me 1039:Serial Number 54129 782:Non-automated edits 202:I’m quite proud of 5944:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 5614:A little blue Bori 3838:no reason not to. 2587:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 2585:per TonyBallioni. 1230:per TonyBallioni. 1142:SanFranJanBansFram 1086: 761:Edit summary usage 709:before commenting. 398:and its archives, 233:Talk:Vegan studies 125:I can't recommend 39: 6018: 5914: 5820: 5649: 5534: 5422:, not personal". 5285:Solid candidate. 5203: 5135: 4938: 4882:full confidence. 4664: 4420: 4104: 4061:We need the dues! 4019: 3964: 3911:based on review. 3243: 3206: 3162: 3122: 3102: 3013: 2881: 2393: 2361: 2255: 2210: 1941: 1917: 1829: 1389: 1272:.See no concerns. 1114: 1082: 891: 831: 830: 707:her contributions 437: 421:comment added by 37: 6303: 6275: 6261: 6252: 6222: 6211:General comments 6147: 6142: 6014: 6013: 6011: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5993: 5986: 5980: 5979: 5977: 5912: 5909: 5906: 5901: 5818: 5815: 5812: 5807: 5703: 5674: 5672: 5663: 5634:Sachinthonakkara 5631: 5620: 5582: 5578: 5573: 5531: 5525: 5520: 5518: 5508: 5481: 5476: 5440: 5435: 5428: 5409: 5357: 5275: 5239: 5201: 5196: 5177: 5171: 5158: 5151: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5129: 5063: 5040: 5033: 5025: 4928: 4854:BernardoSulzbach 4843: 4841: 4836: 4819: 4785: 4675:Roger (Dodger67) 4657: 4654: 4648: 4632: 4631: 4553: 4551: 4534: 4527: 4505:Cincinnati chili 4473: 4471: 4468: 4418: 4408: 4337: 4288: 4274: 4269: 4249: 4182: 4096: 4079: 4074: 4068: 4017: 3962: 3944:Good candidate. 3930: 3884: 3879: 3808: 3616: 3613: 3607: 3569: 3548: 3513: 3508: 3477: 3389:The Rambling Man 3305: 3302: 3240: 3235: 3233: 3203: 3198: 3196: 3159: 3154: 3152: 3120: 3118: 3109: 3100: 3089: 3076: 3074:Compassionate727 3053:Very pleased to 3012: 3010: 3003: 2996: 2992: 2987: 2937: 2932: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2872: 2808: 2771: 2738: 2706: 2701: 2685: 2615: 2610: 2605: 2485:Opabinia regalis 2443: 2440: 2409: 2407: 2392: 2358: 2352: 2347: 2345: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2256: 2254: 2252: 2237: 2232: 2204: 2178: 2176: 2157: 2156: 2153: 2120: 2055: 2017: 2012: 1990: 1985: 1962: 1955: 1939: 1935: 1932: 1907: 1906: 1857: 1852: 1823: 1791: 1753:I am One of Many 1646: 1644:Let's discuss it 1526: 1523: 1468: 1466: 1447: 1430: 1424: 1408: 1387: 1333: 1331: 1220: 1212: 1184: 1181: 1108: 1071: 1064: 963: 941: 936: 906: 897: 885: 777:Articles created 737: 730: 723: 714: 713: 694: 686: 645: 544: 416: 402:and essays like 269: 220:Cincinnati chili 91:Cincinnati chili 6311: 6310: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6302: 6301: 6300: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6278:this nomination 6271: 6250: 6248: 6232: 6216: 6213: 6143: 6138: 6050:Peter Southwood 6007: 6004: 6003: 5997: 5987: 5973: 5970: 5969: 5907: 5902: 5899: 5813: 5808: 5805: 5775: 5698:cygnis insignis 5695: 5668: 5659: 5656: 5618: 5580: 5576: 5571: 5529: 5523: 5516: 5511:this discussion 5502: 5479: 5474: 5438: 5431: 5424: 5405: 5385: 5355: 5271: 5230: 5199: 5175: 5169: 5149: 5147: 5142: 5051: 5036: 5035: 5029: 5021: 4839: 4832: 4830: 4817: 4781: 4709:ComplexRational 4692:Graeme Bartlett 4652: 4646: 4627: 4622: 4549: 4548: 4530: 4525: 4469: 4466: 4463: 4431: 4394: 4333: 4286: 4272: 4262: 4247: 4180: 4077: 4076: 4072: 4066: 4018:◊distænt write◊ 3965: 3958:no concerns. -- 3928: 3882: 3875: 3804: 3611: 3605: 3602: 3565: 3563:Hey why not... 3542: 3511: 3507:Nova Crystallis 3506: 3473: 3303: 3300: 3238: 3231: 3201: 3194: 3157: 3150: 3114: 3111: 3105: 3087: 3071: 3024:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3006: 3004: 2994: 2990: 2985: 2933: 2928: 2910:Megalibrarygirl 2876: 2871:« Gonzo fan2007 2870: 2868: 2820: 2804: 2767: 2736: 2704: 2699: 2683: 2613: 2608: 2603: 2448: 2441: 2438: 2405: 2403: 2356: 2350: 2343: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2250: 2248: 2235: 2230: 2174: 2168: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2118: 2053: 2015: 2010: 1988: 1983: 1958: 1953: 1937: 1930: 1902: 1855: 1850: 1821:Espresso Addict 1803: 1790: 1774: 1642: 1556:cygnis insignis 1524: 1521: 1464: 1462: 1445: 1428: 1422: 1404: 1391: 1329: 1327: 1289:- no concerns. 1216: 1208: 1182: 1179: 1067: 1060: 954: 937: 934: 895: 893: 837: 832: 827: 801: 765: 744: 743:RfA/RfB toolbox 741: 690: 638: 621: 617: 540: 259: 204:Marjorie Paxson 155: 132:Megalibrarygirl 123: 71: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6309: 6299: 6298: 6283: 6282: 6267: 6266: 6265: 6238: 6237: 6228: 6212: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6190: 6173: 6152: 6130: 6129: 6128: 6092: 6075: 6058: 6043: 6021: 6020: 6019: 5990:Britishfinance 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5930:Britishfinance 5891:Britishfinance 5888: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5884: 5859:Britishfinance 5830:Britishfinance 5797: 5774: 5771: 5770: 5769: 5745: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5683:LessHeard vanU 5650: 5640:The preceding 5625: 5606: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5384: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5362: 5348: 5332: 5314: 5297: 5280: 5264: 5243: 5224: 5207: 5193: 5183: 5162: 5127: 5102: 5085: 5068: 5044: 5027: 5015:anyone who is 5010: 4988: 4973: 4963:Cordless Larry 4956: 4942: 4917: 4910:Absolutely. — 4908: 4894: 4864: 4847: 4824: 4807: 4790: 4774: 4762: 4750: 4733: 4719: 4702: 4685: 4668: 4636: 4616: 4598: 4582: 4565: 4539: 4517: 4498: 4477: 4457: 4436: 4427: 4412: 4388: 4373: 4343: 4327: 4310: 4293: 4279: 4255: 4239: 4222: 4204: 4187: 4173: 4166:LessHeard vanU 4158: 4141: 4126: 4109: 4101: 4094: 4093:CAPTAIN MEDUSA 4084: 4070: 4055: 4038: 4024: 4007: 3990: 3970: 3961: 3953: 3939: 3923: 3906: 3889: 3868: 3850: 3833: 3815: 3798: 3778: 3761: 3744: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3690: 3669: 3652: 3640: 3621: 3587: 3558: 3535: 3518: 3504:Net positive. 3499: 3482: 3466: 3449: 3432: 3413: 3399: 3382: 3361: 3351:Reaper Eternal 3344: 3334:Martinevans123 3327: 3310: 3276: 3262:John M Wolfson 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3143: 3126: 3103: 3094: 3080: 3069: 3051: 3034: 3017: 3001: 2976: 2959: 2942: 2920: 2903: 2886: 2862: 2841: 2824: 2810: 2797: 2787:Stephan Schulz 2775: 2761: 2744: 2728: 2711: 2692: 2676: 2660: 2639: 2620: 2597: 2580: 2563: 2546: 2529: 2512: 2495: 2479: 2453: 2446: 2431: 2414: 2406:Rhododendrites 2397: 2383: 2366: 2335: 2318: 2297: 2260: 2242: 2223: 2198: 2182: 2162: 2143: 2126: 2094: 2077: 2060: 2046: 2022: 2007: 2001: 1967: 1946: 1921: 1896: 1879: 1862: 1844: 1833: 1814: 1801: 1795: 1782: 1766:Strong support 1763: 1746: 1731: 1721:ThatMontrealIP 1714: 1691: 1668: 1651: 1630: 1613: 1596: 1579: 1561: 1549: 1532: 1509: 1492: 1475: 1452: 1435: 1412: 1398: 1385: 1377: 1357: 1341:Strong support 1338: 1320: 1299: 1284: 1259: 1249:Britishfinance 1242: 1225: 1198: 1172: 1155: 1135: 1118: 1099: 1076: 1053: 1035: 1018: 1001: 984: 967: 948: 927: 910: 879: 865: 847: 836: 833: 829: 828: 826: 825: 820: 815: 809: 807: 803: 802: 800: 799: 794: 789: 784: 779: 773: 771: 767: 766: 764: 763: 758: 752: 750: 746: 745: 740: 739: 732: 725: 717: 698: 697: 696: 687: 616: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 602: 601: 600: 599: 578: 571: 570: 569: 568: 549: 547: 536: 535: 534: 533: 519: 517: 510: 509: 508: 507: 475: 473: 466: 465: 464: 463: 450: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 382: 375: 374: 373: 372: 359: 357:John M Wolfson 352: 351: 350: 349: 336: 334:John M Wolfson 329: 328: 327: 326: 305: 298: 297: 296: 295: 282: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 239: 238: 237: 236: 212:Marie Anderson 190: 189: 188: 187: 175: 174: 173: 172: 154: 151: 150: 149: 122: 119: 70: 67: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6308: 6297: 6294: 6293: 6291: 6281: 6279: 6274: 6268: 6264: 6260: 6258: 6253: 6246: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6236: 6231: 6226: 6220: 6215: 6214: 6206: 6202: 6198: 6194: 6191: 6189: 6185: 6181: 6177: 6174: 6172: 6168: 6164: 6160: 6156: 6153: 6151: 6148: 6146: 6141: 6134: 6131: 6127: 6126: 6122: 6118: 6114: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6104: 6100: 6096: 6093: 6091: 6087: 6083: 6079: 6076: 6074: 6070: 6066: 6065:Pawnkingthree 6062: 6059: 6057: 6053: 6051: 6047: 6044: 6042: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6032: 6031: 6025: 6022: 6017: 6012: 6010: 6005:usernamekiran 5991: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5978: 5976: 5971:usernamekiran 5967: 5963: 5953: 5949: 5945: 5941: 5940: 5939: 5935: 5931: 5927: 5923: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5915: 5910: 5905: 5896: 5892: 5889: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5821: 5816: 5811: 5801: 5798: 5796: 5792: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5777: 5776: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5756: 5754: 5752: 5749: 5746: 5744: 5740: 5736: 5732: 5729: 5721: 5717: 5713: 5708: 5705: 5704: 5702: 5699: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5673: 5671: 5665: 5664: 5662: 5654: 5651: 5647: 5643: 5639: 5635: 5629: 5626: 5624: 5621: 5616: 5615: 5610: 5607: 5605: 5601: 5597: 5593: 5590: 5586: 5583: 5579: 5574: 5567: 5563: 5557: 5554: 5552: 5550: 5549: 5544: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5535: 5532: 5526: 5519: 5512: 5506: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5486: 5485: 5482: 5477: 5471: 5468: 5464: 5460: 5456: 5453: 5451: 5450:the talk page 5446: 5445: 5444: 5441: 5436: 5434: 5429: 5427: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5408: 5403: 5398: 5394: 5390: 5387: 5386: 5378: 5374: 5370: 5369:Grey Wanderer 5366: 5363: 5361: 5358: 5352: 5349: 5347: 5344: 5342: 5341: 5336: 5333: 5331: 5327: 5323: 5318: 5315: 5313: 5309: 5305: 5301: 5298: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5284: 5281: 5279: 5276: 5274: 5268: 5265: 5263: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5244: 5242: 5237: 5233: 5228: 5225: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5208: 5206: 5202: 5195: 5194: 5191: 5187: 5184: 5182: 5178: 5172: 5166: 5163: 5161: 5156: 5152: 5138: 5133: 5132:edit conflict 5128: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5113: 5109: 5106: 5103: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5086: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5069: 5067: 5064: 5062: 5058: 5054: 5048: 5045: 5043: 5039: 5034: 5032: 5026: 5024: 5018: 5014: 5011: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4996: 4992: 4989: 4987: 4984: 4981: 4977: 4974: 4972: 4968: 4964: 4960: 4957: 4955: 4951: 4947: 4943: 4941: 4936: 4932: 4926: 4922: 4918: 4916: 4913: 4909: 4907: 4904: 4903: 4898: 4895: 4893: 4889: 4885: 4880: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4865: 4863: 4859: 4855: 4851: 4848: 4846: 4842: 4837: 4835: 4828: 4825: 4823: 4820: 4815: 4811: 4808: 4806: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4791: 4789: 4786: 4784: 4778: 4775: 4773: 4770: 4766: 4763: 4761: 4758: 4754: 4751: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4737: 4734: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4718: 4714: 4710: 4706: 4703: 4701: 4697: 4693: 4689: 4686: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4669: 4667: 4663: 4660: 4656: 4655: 4650: 4649: 4640: 4637: 4635: 4630: 4626: 4620: 4617: 4615: 4611: 4607: 4602: 4599: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4586: 4583: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4569: 4566: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4543: 4540: 4538: 4535: 4533: 4528: 4521: 4518: 4516: 4513: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4499: 4497: 4493: 4492: 4487: 4486: 4481: 4478: 4476: 4472: 4461: 4458: 4456: 4452: 4448: 4444: 4440: 4437: 4435: 4430: 4425: 4416: 4413: 4411: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4392: 4389: 4387: 4384: 4381: 4377: 4374: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4351: 4347: 4344: 4342: 4339: 4336: 4331: 4328: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4311: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4294: 4292: 4289: 4283: 4280: 4278: 4275: 4270: 4268: 4267: 4259: 4256: 4254: 4251: 4250: 4243: 4240: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4223: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4208: 4205: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4188: 4186: 4183: 4177: 4174: 4171: 4167: 4162: 4159: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4142: 4140: 4137: 4136: 4130: 4127: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4110: 4108: 4105: 4103: 4102: 4099: 4095: 4092: 4088: 4085: 4083: 4080: 4075: 4069: 4062: 4059: 4056: 4054: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4039: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4026:No concerns. 4025: 4023: 4020: 4015: 4011: 4008: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3997:Stormy clouds 3994: 3991: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3974: 3971: 3969: 3966: 3957: 3954: 3952: 3949: 3948: 3943: 3940: 3938: 3935: 3932: 3931: 3924: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3907: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3890: 3888: 3885: 3880: 3878: 3872: 3869: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3858:ZettaComposer 3854: 3851: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3834: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3819: 3816: 3814: 3811: 3810:Voice of Clam 3807: 3806:O Still Small 3802: 3799: 3797: 3794: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3779: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3762: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3745: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3691: 3689: 3686: 3682: 3679: 3678: 3673: 3670: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3653: 3651: 3648: 3645: 3641: 3639: 3636: 3635: 3630: 3629: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3617: 3615: 3608: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3588: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3568: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3554: 3553: 3549: 3547: 3546: 3539: 3536: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3519: 3517: 3514: 3509: 3503: 3500: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3483: 3481: 3478: 3476: 3470: 3467: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3450: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3433: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3417: 3414: 3412: 3409: 3407: 3403: 3400: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3383: 3381: 3377: 3376:contributions 3373: 3369: 3365: 3362: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3311: 3309: 3306: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3277: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3256: 3246: 3241: 3234: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3213:User:Gamaliel 3211: 3210: 3209: 3204: 3197: 3191: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3169:User:Gamaliel 3167: 3166: 3165: 3160: 3153: 3147: 3144: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3127: 3125: 3119: 3117: 3110: 3108: 3099: 3095: 3093: 3090: 3084: 3081: 3079: 3075: 3070: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3018: 3016: 3011: 3009: 3002: 3000: 2997: 2993: 2988: 2980: 2977: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2960: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2943: 2941: 2938: 2936: 2931: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2904: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2887: 2885: 2879: 2873: 2866: 2863: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2842: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2807: 2801: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2779: 2776: 2774: 2770: 2765: 2762: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2745: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2707: 2702: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2688: 2686: 2680: 2677: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2664: 2661: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646:haggis pakora 2643: 2640: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2619: 2616: 2611: 2606: 2601: 2598: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2564: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536:Coolabahapple 2533: 2530: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2513: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2496: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2478: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2452: 2449: 2444: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2408: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2391: 2390:Seraphimblade 2387: 2384: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2353: 2346: 2339: 2336: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2253: 2251:QueerFilmNerd 2246: 2243: 2241: 2238: 2233: 2227: 2224: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2208: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2172: 2166: 2163: 2161: 2158: 2147: 2144: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2122: 2121: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101:too much time 2098: 2095: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2051:Per Ritchie. 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2026: 2023: 2021: 2018: 2013: 2011:Berean Hunter 2005: 2002: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1956: 1950: 1947: 1945: 1942: 1940: 1934: 1933: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1915: 1911: 1905: 1900: 1897: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1863: 1861: 1858: 1853: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1818: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1789: 1787: 1780: 1779: 1771: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1652: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1640: 1639: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1460: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1425: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1407: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1332: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1300: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1213: 1211: 1206: 1205:SportingFlyer 1202: 1199: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1065: 1063: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1002: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 985: 983: 979: 975: 971: 968: 966: 962: 960: 959: 952: 949: 947: 944: 942: 940: 931: 928: 926: 922: 918: 917:Bill Williams 914: 911: 909: 905: 903: 898: 889: 888:edit conflict 883: 880: 878: 874: 870: 866: 864: 861: 859: 857: 856: 852:as nominator 851: 848: 846: 843: 839: 838: 824: 821: 819: 816: 814: 811: 810: 808: 804: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 774: 772: 768: 762: 759: 757: 754: 753: 751: 747: 738: 733: 731: 726: 724: 719: 718: 715: 711: 710: 708: 704: 693: 688: 684: 681: 678: 675: 672: 669: 666: 663: 660: 657: 654: 651: 648: 644: 641: 637: 634: 631: 628: 624: 619: 618: 606: 605: 604: 603: 596: 593: 592: 590: 586: 582: 579: 577: 573: 572: 567:instructions. 563: 560: 559: 557: 556:admin backlog 553: 550: 548: 546: 543: 538: 537: 530: 527: 526: 523: 520: 518: 516: 512: 511: 506: 502: 498: 493: 490: 489: 487: 483: 479: 476: 474: 472: 468: 467: 460: 457: 456: 454: 451: 449: 445: 444: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423:Leaky caldron 420: 413: 412: 410: 405: 401: 397: 392: 389: 388: 386: 383: 381: 377: 376: 369: 366: 365: 363: 360: 358: 354: 353: 346: 343: 342: 340: 337: 335: 331: 330: 324: 320: 317: 316: 314: 309: 306: 304: 300: 299: 292: 289: 288: 286: 283: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 267: 266:two questions 263: 250: 247: 246: 244: 241: 240: 234: 230: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 198: 197: 195: 192: 191: 184: 179: 178: 177: 176: 169: 166: 165: 163: 160: 159: 158: 147: 144: 143: 142: 141: 137: 133: 128: 121:Co-nomination 118: 117: 114: 112: 110: 109: 102: 100: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 79: 75: 66: 65: 64: 60: 56: 48: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 6272: 6269: 6256: 6192: 6175: 6158: 6154: 6144: 6139: 6132: 6112: 6111: 6094: 6077: 6060: 6045: 6035: 6029: 6027: 6023: 6008: 5974: 5925: 5922:Bellezzasolo 5904:Bellezzasolo 5903: 5810:Bellezzasolo 5809: 5799: 5778: 5747: 5730: 5706: 5669: 5660: 5657: 5652: 5627: 5613: 5608: 5591: 5569: 5547: 5514: 5469: 5447: 5433:SerialNumber 5432: 5425: 5415: 5400: 5388: 5364: 5350: 5343: 5338: 5334: 5316: 5299: 5282: 5272: 5266: 5250:WP:NOBIGDEAL 5245: 5229:, per noms. 5226: 5209: 5189: 5185: 5164: 5136: 5111: 5104: 5087: 5075:RebeccaGreen 5070: 5060: 5056: 5052: 5046: 5037: 5030: 5022: 5016: 5012: 4994: 4990: 4975: 4958: 4901: 4896: 4866: 4849: 4833: 4826: 4809: 4792: 4783:CAPTAIN RAJU 4782: 4776: 4764: 4752: 4735: 4704: 4687: 4670: 4644: 4642: 4638: 4618: 4600: 4584: 4567: 4547: 4546: 4541: 4531: 4524: 4519: 4500: 4490: 4484: 4479: 4459: 4438: 4419:(rolls dice) 4414: 4390: 4375: 4358: 4349: 4345: 4329: 4312: 4295: 4281: 4265: 4263: 4257: 4245: 4241: 4224: 4206: 4189: 4175: 4160: 4143: 4133: 4128: 4111: 4098: 4090: 4086: 4064: 4060: 4057: 4040: 4009: 3992: 3976:WP:NOBIGDEAL 3972: 3955: 3946: 3941: 3929:Juliancolton 3926: 3908: 3896:Double sharp 3891: 3876: 3870: 3852: 3835: 3823:Andy Dingley 3817: 3800: 3787: 3780: 3763: 3746: 3729: 3692: 3675: 3671: 3659:David Gerard 3654: 3643: 3633: 3627: 3623: 3601: 3589: 3566: 3560: 3551: 3544: 3543: 3537: 3520: 3501: 3484: 3474: 3468: 3451: 3434: 3419: 3415: 3401: 3384: 3363: 3346: 3329: 3312: 3290: 3278: 3257: 3190:au contraire 3189: 3145: 3128: 3115: 3106: 3082: 3059:Innisfree987 3054: 3036: 3019: 3007: 2983: 2978: 2961: 2944: 2934: 2929: 2922: 2905: 2888: 2864: 2843: 2826: 2805: 2799: 2777: 2763: 2746: 2734: 2730: 2713: 2694: 2678: 2662: 2641: 2599: 2582: 2570:Peacemaker67 2565: 2548: 2531: 2514: 2497: 2481: 2462:filelakeshoe 2455: 2433: 2416: 2399: 2385: 2368: 2341: 2337: 2320: 2304:WP:NOBIGDEAL 2299: 2276: 2275: 2270: 2262: 2244: 2225: 2206: 2200: 2184: 2164: 2145: 2128: 2116: 2112: 2100: 2096: 2079: 2062: 2048: 2039: 2034: 2029: 2024: 2003: 1981: 1974:Usedtobecool 1969: 1959: 1948: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1898: 1881: 1869:StudiesWorld 1864: 1846: 1816: 1806: 1805: 1797: 1785: 1776: 1769: 1765: 1748: 1733: 1716: 1704: 1693: 1681: 1670: 1653: 1643: 1637: 1632: 1615: 1598: 1581: 1563: 1551: 1534: 1519: 1511: 1494: 1477: 1465:Usedtobecool 1459:TonyBallioni 1454: 1437: 1414: 1400: 1379: 1367:Gerda Arendt 1359: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1326: 1322: 1301: 1286: 1261: 1244: 1232:Gog the Mild 1227: 1215: 1207: 1200: 1174: 1157: 1137: 1120: 1101: 1078: 1068: 1061: 1055: 1020: 1008:MarginalCost 1003: 986: 969: 957: 956: 950: 938: 929: 912: 901: 881: 869:TonyBallioni 854: 849: 700: 699: 679: 673: 667: 661: 655: 649: 642: 635: 629: 594: 580: 561: 551: 528: 521: 491: 477: 458: 452: 417:— Preceding 408: 390: 384: 367: 361: 344: 338: 322: 318: 312: 307: 303:StudiesWorld 290: 284: 265: 258: 248: 242: 216:Zhang Dongju 199: 193: 167: 161: 156: 145: 124: 107: 103: 99:Did you know 95:Women in Red 88:good article 80: 72: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 5942:Well said. 5895:WP:INVOLVED 5874:Ad Orientem 5844:Ad Orientem 5787:Ad Orientem 5670:)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 5353:- Why not. 5340:Jetstreamer 5000:Daniel Case 4902:William2001 4363:Nosebagbear 4350:didn't know 3894:. Why not? 3877:Laser brain 3783:why not? – 3749:per DGG. – 3489:K.e.coffman 3368:VibeScepter 3295:no big deal 3186:User:Drmies 2908:as co-nom. 2817:revolutions 2629:Mkativerata 2267:WP:FRAMGATE 2109:WP:Teahouse 2105:WP:Helpdesk 2084:Logophile59 1658:Newyorkbrad 1330:scope_creep 1270:Net Postive 823:User rights 813:CentralAuth 515:Nosebagbear 6225:Ivanvector 6219:Ritchie333 6082:Shearonink 5735:CLCStudent 5548:Ritchie333 5505:Trialpears 5490:Trialpears 5117:Tryptofish 4884:Nick Moyes 4879:WP:FRAMBAN 4723:GoldenRing 4447:epicgenius 4424:Ivanvector 4397:Javert2113 4357:, and you 4317:Malcolmxl5 4300:Cwmhiraeth 4212:Find bruce 3978:. Thanks. 3304:SandDoctor 3041:PhilKnight 3008:Sandstein 2831:Trialpears 2783:WP:FRAMBAN 2148:Why not? - 1931:Newslinger 1539:JohnThorne 1429:Parlez Moi 1423:Guerillero 1348:especially 1162:Clovermoss 1043:~ ToBeFree 855:Ritchie333 806:Cross-wiki 797:AfD closes 615:Discussion 275:Ritchie333 108:Ritchie333 69:Nomination 31:successful 6243:Also see 6197:Willbb234 6163:Foxnpichu 5517:Anarchyte 5287:Shellwood 5232:Vanamonde 5112:wonderful 4980:Athaenara 4875:WP:WOMRED 4797:DannyS712 4769:FlyingAce 4606:Michepman 4588:Antrocent 4194:Vexations 4028:Mélencron 3980:Mike Peel 3947:Jianhui67 3840:Danski454 3768:GermanJoe 3677:Sasquatch 3567:Doc James 3088:Montanabw 2893:Barkeep49 2769:EggRoll97 2650:Andrew D. 2502:Rosiestep 2447:(blether) 2344:Anarchyte 2308:Guettarda 2236:(discuss) 2067:Ajraddatz 1972:- citing 1781:(he/him) 1738:Mackensen 1698:Cas Liber 1025:Chetsford 974:Ymblanter 792:AfD votes 787:BLP edits 665:block log 279:via email 6290:Category 6180:CptViraj 6099:Ingratis 5712:Ret.Prof 5707:Comment: 5642:unsigned 5581:Chequers 5455:Primefac 5404:"), and 5356:FitIndia 5351:Support: 5317:Support: 5304:Ret.Prof 5300:Support: 5254:Aoi (青い) 5170:Rutebega 4935:Articles 4931:Contribs 4921:Johannes 4871:Teahouse 4827:Support. 4671:Suppport 4662:Contribs 4526:Broccoli 4509:FloNight 4148:Rollidan 3909:Support. 3751:Ammarpad 3734:Bakazaka 3693:Support. 3672:Support. 3647:Armbrust 3642:Pile-on 3577:contribs 3439:Pichpich 3435:Support' 3270:contribs 3232:Gamaliel 3195:Gamaliel 3151:Gamaliel 2995:Chequers 2684:kashmīrī 2666:Lectonar 2553:Hugsyrup 2373:Donner60 2284:Dark2000 2231:Hawkeye7 2133:Tom (LT) 2099:I spend 1984:starship 1914:contribs 1807:Rosguill 1802:signed, 1736:. Sure. 1708:contribs 1685:contribs 1603:Muboshgu 1482:— Maile 1418:Why not? 1363:precious 1192:contribs 1093:contribs 1079:Support. 1062:Schazjmd 930:Support. 913:Support. 882:Support. 770:Analysis 749:Counters 633:contribs 623:Valereee 589:WP:CIVIL 585:WP:CIVIL 576:RoySmith 497:valereee 486:only one 431:contribs 419:unsigned 127:Valereee 84:contribs 74:Valereee 55:Primefac 47:Valereee 6193:Neutral 6176:Neutral 6155:Neutral 6133:Neutral 6117:WaltCip 6113:Neutral 6095:Neutral 6078:Neutral 6061:Neutral 6046:Neutral 6024:Neutral 5913:Discuss 5819:Discuss 5800:Neutral 5779:Neutral 5773:Neutral 5661:AhmadLX 5480:Corbett 5407:Wehwalt 5365:Support 5335:Support 5283:Support 5267:Support 5246:Support 5227:Support 5210:Support 5186:Support 5165:Support 5150:Invalid 5137:Support 5105:Support 5092:Collect 5088:Support 5071:Support 5047:Support 5017:foolish 5013:Support 4995:because 4991:Support 4976:Support 4959:Support 4897:Support 4867:Support 4850:Support 4814:the wub 4810:Support 4793:Support 4777:Support 4765:Support 4753:Support 4740:Loopy30 4736:Support 4705:Support 4688:Support 4653:Hamster 4639:Support 4619:Support 4601:Support 4585:Support 4568:Support 4542:Support 4520:Support 4501:Support 4485:MRD2014 4480:Support 4470:Writer 4460:Support 4439:Support 4415:Support 4401:Siarad. 4391:Support 4376:Support 4355:WP:FRAM 4346:Support 4330:Support 4313:Support 4296:Support 4282:Support 4258:Support 4242:Support 4225:Support 4207:Support 4190:Support 4176:Support 4161:Support 4144:Support 4135:Lindsay 4129:Support 4112:Support 4087:Support 4067:caknuck 4058:Support 4045:WaltCip 4041:Support 4010:Support 3993:Support 3973:Support 3960:Cameron 3956:Support 3942:Support 3913:Kierzek 3892:Support 3871:Support 3853:Support 3836:Support 3818:Support 3801:Support 3781:Support 3764:Support 3747:Support 3730:Support 3655:Support 3644:support 3624:Support 3598:WP:RFPP 3590:Support 3561:Support 3538:Support 3521:Support 3502:Support 3485:Support 3469:Support 3452:Support 3416:Support 3402:Support 3385:Support 3364:Support 3347:Support 3330:Support 3313:Support 3287:WP:FRAM 3283:WP:FRAM 3279:Support 3258:Support 3146:Support 3133:Dolotta 3129:Support 3083:Support 3055:support 3037:Support 3020:Support 2979:Support 2962:Support 2949:Snaevar 2945:Support 2930:Striker 2923:Support 2906:Support 2889:Support 2865:Support 2852:Amakuru 2848:WP:FRAM 2844:Support 2827:Support 2813:spin me 2800:Support 2781:If the 2778:Support 2764:Support 2747:Support 2737:Spencer 2731:Support 2718:agucova 2714:Support 2695:Support 2679:Support 2663:Support 2642:Support 2600:Support 2583:Support 2566:Support 2549:Support 2532:Support 2515:Support 2498:Support 2482:Support 2457:Support 2434:Support 2417:Support 2400:Support 2386:Support 2369:Support 2338:Support 2321:Support 2300:Support 2263:Support 2245:Support 2226:Support 2209:oppose. 2201:Support 2185:Support 2165:Support 2146:Support 2129:Support 2119:Orville 2103:at the 2097:Support 2080:Support 2063:Support 2054:Lourdes 2049:Support 2025:Support 2004:Support 1970:Support 1949:Support 1924:Support 1904:Elmidae 1899:Support 1886:Banedon 1882:Support 1865:Support 1847:Support 1817:Support 1798:Support 1749:Support 1734:Support 1717:Support 1694:Support 1675:Granger 1671:Support 1654:Support 1633:Support 1616:Support 1599:Support 1586:Mccapra 1582:Support 1564:Support 1552:Support 1535:Support 1516:WP:FRAM 1512:Support 1495:Support 1478:Support 1455:Support 1438:Support 1415:Support 1401:Support 1380:Support 1360:Support 1323:Support 1306:Ritchie 1302:Support 1294:Snowman 1287:Support 1262:Support 1245:Support 1228:Support 1201:Support 1175:Support 1158:Support 1138:Support 1121:Support 1102:Support 1056:Support 1021:Support 1004:Support 991:~mitch~ 987:Support 970:Support 951:Support 850:Support 835:Support 640:deleted 448:Dolotta 371:happen. 6036:Karate 6009:(talk) 5975:(talk) 5748:Oppose 5731:Oppose 5653:Oppose 5648:(UTC). 5628:Oppose 5609:Oppose 5596:Hlevy2 5592:Oppose 5470:Oppose 5389:Oppose 5383:Oppose 5273:Nihlus 5214:Haukur 5192:N.J.A. 4946:1997kB 4552:Thomas 4532:Coffee 4529:& 4467:Cactus 4380:Deryck 4229:Ifnord 4116:Drmies 3883:(talk) 3594:WP:AIV 3545:bd2412 3512:(Talk) 3456:Sadads 3406:Kurtis 3291:loaded 3217:Drmies 3173:Drmies 2877:(talk) 2751:ferret 2442:Summit 2325:SusunW 2213:GRuban 2207:timing 2193:(talk) 2155:ASTILY 2016:(talk) 1989:.paint 1978:Bilorv 1960:(talk) 1856:{talk} 1851:~SS49~ 1778:Bilorv 1741:(talk) 1638:Cullen 1499:rogerd 1180:python 1125:MrClog 1084:Aranya 1069:(talk) 756:XTools 210:, and 6230:Edits 6140:Davey 5759:Pudeo 5619:v^_^v 5577:Spiel 5439:54129 5420:Sonny 5402:votes 4647:Super 4625:Leviv 4429:Edits 4287:Gizza 3963:11598 3628:Seren 3581:email 3426:talk 3317:MONGO 2991:Spiel 2966:14GTR 2935:force 2806:78.26 2614:bolly 2604:Tolly 2439:Girth 2278:Light 2035:Hyper 1525:intan 1406:Katie 1350:now. 1310:RexxS 1291:Giant 1183:coder 703:civil 647:count 482:WP:AE 380:Leaky 262:limit 61:) at 16:< 6257:Talk 6201:talk 6167:talk 6145:2010 6121:talk 6103:talk 6086:talk 6069:talk 6030:Fish 5966:Addy 5964:per 5948:talk 5934:talk 5878:talk 5863:talk 5848:talk 5834:talk 5791:talk 5763:talk 5739:talk 5716:talk 5687:talk 5638:talk 5600:talk 5572:Ϣere 5530:work 5524:talk 5494:talk 5475:Eric 5459:talk 5412:said 5410:who 5397:this 5373:talk 5326:talk 5308:talk 5291:talk 5258:talk 5236:Talk 5218:talk 5200:talk 5176:talk 5155:talk 5121:talk 5096:talk 5079:talk 5023:ZLEA 5004:talk 4967:talk 4950:talk 4925:Talk 4888:talk 4858:talk 4818:"?!" 4801:talk 4744:talk 4727:talk 4713:talk 4696:talk 4679:talk 4659:Talk 4610:talk 4576:talk 4559:talk 4512:♥♥♥♥ 4491:talk 4451:talk 4417:per 4367:talk 4321:talk 4304:talk 4264:brad 4233:talk 4216:talk 4198:talk 4170:talk 4152:talk 4120:talk 4100:talk 4049:talk 4032:talk 4014:L3X1 4001:talk 3984:talk 3917:talk 3900:talk 3862:talk 3844:talk 3827:talk 3785:Tera 3772:talk 3755:talk 3738:talk 3719:talk 3711:this 3709:And 3701:talk 3663:talk 3634:Dept 3573:talk 3529:talk 3525:WOPR 3493:talk 3475:Noah 3460:talk 3443:talk 3393:talk 3372:talk 3355:talk 3338:talk 3321:talk 3266:talk 3239:talk 3221:talk 3202:talk 3177:talk 3158:talk 3137:talk 3063:talk 3045:talk 3028:talk 2986:Ϣere 2970:talk 2953:talk 2914:talk 2897:talk 2856:talk 2835:talk 2791:talk 2755:talk 2722:talk 2670:talk 2654:talk 2633:talk 2591:talk 2557:talk 2540:talk 2523:talk 2506:talk 2489:talk 2425:talk 2377:talk 2357:work 2351:talk 2329:talk 2312:talk 2302:per 2291:talk 2289:🌀 ( 2217:talk 2137:talk 2107:and 2088:talk 2071:talk 2040:cube 2030:Semi 1994:talk 1976:and 1954:Kuru 1938:talk 1910:talk 1890:talk 1873:talk 1836:Step 1826:talk 1786:talk 1757:talk 1725:talk 1702:talk 1679:talk 1662:talk 1624:talk 1607:talk 1590:talk 1573:talk 1569:ST47 1543:talk 1503:talk 1486:talk 1388:Talk 1371:talk 1314:talk 1308:. -- 1278:talk 1264:Per 1253:talk 1236:talk 1188:talk 1166:talk 1129:talk 1111:talk 1089:talk 1047:talk 1029:talk 1012:talk 995:talk 978:talk 921:talk 902:Talk 873:talk 842:El_C 692:here 677:rfar 659:logs 627:talk 501:talk 427:talk 409:that 136:talk 78:talk 59:talk 6251:MJL 6247:. – 5414:, " 4933:) ( 4834:AGK 4629:ich 4359:are 4248:JTP 3789:tix 3612:ray 3606:Big 3421:DGG 3374:) ( 3301:The 2705:Why 2421:Deb 2410:\\ 2281:and 2189:PMC 1839:hen 1620:Mz7 1442:gnu 1352:GAB 1151:🖋 1106:Joe 939:WBG 896:MJL 683:spi 653:AfD 581:13. 552:12. 522:11. 478:10. 471:PBS 264:of 6292:: 6233:) 6227:(/ 6203:) 6186:) 6184:📧 6169:) 6157:- 6123:) 6105:) 6088:) 6071:) 6054:: 5950:) 5936:) 5880:) 5865:) 5850:) 5836:) 5793:) 5765:) 5741:) 5718:) 5689:) 5632:— 5630:- 5602:) 5527:| 5513:. 5496:) 5461:) 5426:—— 5375:) 5328:) 5310:) 5293:) 5260:) 5252:. 5220:) 5197:| 5179:) 5123:) 5115:-- 5098:) 5081:) 5006:) 4983:✉ 4969:) 4952:) 4927:) 4919:-- 4912:🦊 4890:) 4860:) 4803:) 4746:) 4729:) 4715:) 4698:) 4681:) 4623:– 4612:) 4594:) 4592:♫♬ 4578:) 4561:) 4494:) 4482:— 4464:— 4453:) 4432:) 4426:(/ 4383:C. 4369:) 4323:) 4306:) 4273:🍁 4235:) 4218:) 4200:) 4154:) 4122:) 4051:) 4034:) 4003:) 3986:) 3933:| 3919:) 3902:) 3864:) 3846:) 3829:) 3774:) 3757:) 3740:) 3721:) 3703:) 3665:) 3583:) 3579:· 3575:· 3531:) 3495:) 3462:) 3445:) 3428:) 3395:) 3378:) 3357:) 3340:) 3323:) 3298:-- 3272:) 3268:• 3223:) 3188:, 3179:) 3139:) 3112:• 3098:MX 3065:) 3057:. 3047:) 3030:) 2972:) 2955:) 2916:) 2899:) 2880:@ 2858:) 2837:) 2815:/ 2793:) 2757:) 2724:) 2700:So 2672:) 2656:) 2648:. 2635:) 2593:) 2576:) 2559:) 2542:) 2525:) 2508:) 2491:) 2474:🐱 2472:) 2468:/ 2460:– 2427:) 2379:) 2354:| 2331:) 2314:) 2306:. 2293:) 2219:) 2211:-- 2191:♠ 2171:SJ 2169:– 2139:) 2090:) 2073:) 2008:— 1980:. 1912:· 1892:) 1875:) 1775:— 1759:) 1727:) 1710:) 1687:) 1664:) 1626:) 1609:) 1592:) 1575:) 1545:) 1505:) 1488:) 1446:57 1426:| 1420:-- 1393:📧 1373:) 1365:-- 1316:) 1280:) 1255:) 1238:) 1194:) 1190:| 1168:) 1146:Mr 1131:) 1095:) 1091:| 1049:) 1031:) 1014:) 997:) 980:) 961:iz 923:) 875:) 671:lu 595:A: 562:A: 529:A: 503:) 492:A: 459:A: 453:9. 433:) 429:• 391:A. 385:8. 368:A: 362:7. 345:A: 339:6. 323:me 319:A: 308:5. 291:A: 285:4. 249:A: 243:3. 200:A: 194:2. 168:A: 162:1. 138:) 36:. 6259:‐ 6255:‐ 6221:: 6217:@ 6199:( 6182:( 6165:( 6119:( 6101:( 6084:( 6067:( 6033:+ 6002:— 5992:: 5988:@ 5946:( 5932:( 5908:✡ 5900:∰ 5876:( 5861:( 5846:( 5832:( 5814:✡ 5806:∰ 5789:( 5761:( 5737:( 5714:( 5685:( 5666:- 5636:( 5598:( 5533:) 5521:( 5507:: 5503:@ 5492:( 5457:( 5452:. 5371:( 5324:( 5306:( 5289:( 5256:( 5238:) 5234:( 5216:( 5173:( 5157:) 5153:( 5134:) 5130:( 5119:( 5094:( 5077:( 5061:a 5059:c 5057:z 5055:a 5053:m 5038:\ 5031:T 5002:( 4965:( 4948:( 4937:) 4929:( 4923:( 4886:( 4856:( 4840:■ 4799:( 4742:( 4725:( 4711:( 4694:( 4677:( 4643:~ 4608:( 4590:( 4574:( 4557:( 4550:C 4488:( 4449:( 4407:) 4405:¤ 4403:| 4399:( 4395:— 4365:( 4335:œ 4319:( 4302:( 4266:v 4231:( 4214:( 4196:( 4172:) 4168:( 4150:( 4118:( 4073:° 4047:( 4030:( 3999:( 3982:( 3915:( 3898:( 3860:( 3842:( 3825:( 3793:₵ 3770:( 3753:( 3736:( 3717:( 3699:( 3685:c 3683:| 3681:t 3661:( 3631:_ 3614:ᗙ 3610:X 3604:D 3571:( 3552:T 3527:( 3491:( 3458:( 3441:( 3424:( 3391:( 3370:( 3353:( 3336:( 3319:( 3264:( 3242:) 3236:( 3219:( 3205:) 3199:( 3175:( 3161:) 3155:( 3135:( 3121:) 3116:✎ 3107:✉ 3101:( 3072:— 3061:( 3043:( 3026:( 2968:( 2951:( 2912:( 2895:( 2854:( 2833:( 2819:) 2811:( 2789:( 2753:( 2720:( 2668:( 2652:( 2631:( 2609:4 2589:( 2572:( 2555:( 2538:( 2521:( 2504:( 2487:( 2470:c 2466:t 2464:( 2423:( 2375:( 2360:) 2348:( 2327:( 2310:( 2215:( 2175:+ 2152:F 2135:( 2086:( 2069:( 1996:) 1992:( 1916:) 1908:( 1888:( 1871:( 1828:) 1824:( 1788:) 1784:( 1755:( 1723:( 1705:· 1700:( 1682:· 1677:( 1660:( 1622:( 1605:( 1588:( 1571:( 1541:( 1522:Y 1501:( 1484:( 1470:✨ 1369:( 1312:( 1276:( 1251:( 1234:( 1218:C 1214:· 1210:T 1186:( 1164:( 1149:X 1127:( 1113:) 1109:( 1087:( 1045:( 1027:( 1010:( 993:( 976:( 958:L 935:∯ 919:( 904:‐ 900:‐ 892:– 890:) 886:( 871:( 736:e 729:t 722:v 695:. 685:) 680:· 674:· 668:· 662:· 656:· 650:· 643:· 636:· 630:· 625:( 542:œ 499:( 425:( 281:) 277:( 134:( 81:· 76:( 57:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Valereee - Knowledge

Index