Knowledge

:Peer review/Guidelines - Knowledge

Source 📝

279: 595:
Check if your review is appearing on the unanswered list. It won't if more than a single edit has been made. If you've received minimal feedback, or have edited your review more than once, you can manually add it to the backlog list (see Step 2: Requesting a review, step 6). This ensures reviewers
610:
Your review may be more successful if you politely request feedback on the discussion pages of related articles; send messages to Wikipedians who have contributed to the same or a related field; and also request peer review at appropriate
697:
If the review is to determine whether an article can be nominated for GA, FA or FL status, and a reviewer believes it has a reasonable chance of passing these, they may close the review and encourage a direct nomination
315:
Anyone can request peer review. Editors submitting a new request are encouraged to review an article from those already listed, and encourage reviewers by replying promptly and appreciatively to comments.
599:
Please be patient! Consider working on some other article while the review is open and remember to watch it until it is formally closed. It may take weeks before an interested volunteer spots your review.
571:
nomination. These reviews often wait longer than others, because the type of review they need is more detailed and specialised than normal. There are some things you should know before doing this:
734:
When you view a review, click on the tab that says "More" and then "Close peer review". The tab can be found near the "History" tab. This should update the article's talk page and the review page.
304:
before asking for a peer review). Follow the directions below to open a peer review. After that, the most effective way to receive review comments is by posting a request on the talk page of a
438:
Complete the new page as instructed. Remember to say what kind of comments or contributions you want, and/or the sections of the article you think need reviewing.
699: 454: 297: 301: 450: 142: 42: 240: 709: 400: 152: 188: 618:
Note that requests still may be closed if left unanswered for more than a month and once no more contributions seem likely. See Step 4.
607:
for assistance. An excellent way to get reviews is to review a few other requests without responses and ask for reviews in return.
459: 679:
If you are the nominator, you can close the review at any time, although this is discouraged if a discussion is still active.
293: 738: 333: 233: 209: 116: 77: 604: 583: 305: 214: 173: 147: 776: 360: 157: 590: 468: 337: 329: 204: 137: 111: 70: 407: 319: 288:
is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential
226: 453:, resulting in delays in it being picked up by a reviewer. If this has happened, add your peer review to 183: 63: 641: 178: 56: 567:
All types of article can be peer reviewed. Sometimes, a nominator wants a peer review before making a
445:) at the end of your request to sign it. Your peer review will be automatically listed within an hour. 771:
For easier navigation, a list of peer reviews, without the reviews themselves included, can be found
621: 729: 269: 106: 757:
If you think something is wrong, or could be improved, post a comment on the peer review page.
612: 92: 35: 17: 8: 464: 262: 254: 449:
Avoid re-editing your own nomination. This makes your nomination disappear from the
458: 764: 772: 751: 705:
If a review is answered and the nominator is inactive for more than one week.
561: 471:), so that you won't have to wait too long before someone comments on yours. 393: 389: 385: 378: 374: 370: 289: 121: 763:
Interested in reviewing articles of your subject area? Add your name to the
721:
There is a script to help automate closing peer reviews. To use the script:
691: 687: 683: 576: 568: 325: 369:
Articles may not be listed for a peer review while they are nominated for
422: 467:
and every time you nominate a review, respond or add to another review (
775:. A chronological peer reviews list (not sorted by topic) can be found 579:, and contact some active reviewers there to contribute to your review 615:. Please do not spam many users or projects with identical requests. 435:
Click within the notice to create a new peer review discussion page.
366:
14 days must have passed since the last peer review of that article.
556:
If no topic is chosen, the article is listed with General topics.
310: 726:
importScript('User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/peerReviewCloser.js');
650:
is the number of the peer review discussion page above (e.g.
586:, and remove when you think you have received enough feedback 744: 479:
The topic parameter can be changed by altering the template
278: 300:" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read 351:
Nominations are limited to one open request per editor.
489:) on the template can be set as one of the following: 638:
tag on the article's talk page and replace this with
455:
Template:Peer review/Unanswered peer reviews sidebar
359:Content or neutrality disputes should be listed at 384:Please address issues raised in an unsuccessful 356:Articles must be free of major cleanup banners 234: 710:Knowledge:Peer review/Request removal policy 760:Feel free to improve the article yourself! 739:Knowledge:Peer review/Tools#Closure script 682:If the article has become a candidate for 241: 227: 399:For more information on these limits see 632:On the article's talk page, remove the 582:Please add your article to the sidebar 14: 485:on an article's talk page. The topic ( 550:(natural sciences & mathematics) 441:Save the page with the four tildes ( 29: 23: 575:Have a look at advice provided at 277: 24: 794: 657:On the peer review page, remove 584:Template:FAC peer review sidebar 524:(social sciences & society) 324:For general editing advice see 542:(engineering & technology) 13: 1: 596:don't overlook your request. 752:current list of peer reviews 708:A full list is available at 674:When can a review be closed? 660:{{Peer review page|topic=X}} 591:Step 3: Waiting for a review 482:{{Peer review page|topic=X}} 428:to the top of the article's 7: 666:{{Closed peer review page}} 511:(philosophy & religion) 503:(language & literature) 408:Step 2: Requesting a review 320:Step 1: Prepare the article 294:featured article candidates 10: 799: 562:featured article candidacy 451:List of unanswered reviews 252: 750:Select an article on the 363:, and not at peer review. 730:Special:MyPage/common.js 622:Step 4: Closing a review 296:, or an article of any " 290:good article nominations 28: 642:subst:Close peer review 375:featured article status 334:writing better articles 326:introduction to editing 117:Writing better articles 663:and replace this with 282: 737:For more details see 338:"The perfect article" 330:developing an article 281: 18:Knowledge:Peer review 413:To add a nomination: 396:before opening a PR. 379:featured list status 361:requests for comment 463:. Please consider 371:good article status 166:Peer review process 112:Develop the article 107:Start a new article 627:To close a review: 283: 270:WP:PR/Instructions 786: 785: 577:featured articles 551: 543: 525: 512: 504: 475:To change a topic 469:current list here 251: 250: 85: 84: 790: 727: 688:featured article 668: 667: 662: 661: 653: 649: 645: 637: 636: 569:featured article 549: 541: 523: 510: 502: 488: 484: 483: 462: 444: 426: 352: 272: 265: 243: 236: 229: 99:Editing articles 89: 88: 30: 26: 25: 798: 797: 793: 792: 791: 789: 788: 787: 782: 781: 747: 725: 665: 664: 659: 658: 654:for /archive1). 651: 647: 639: 635:{{Peer review}} 634: 633: 624: 605:volunteers list 593: 560:Reviews before 554: 486: 481: 480: 442: 420: 410: 350: 322: 313: 276: 275: 268: 261: 257: 247: 215:Volunteers list 148:FAC preparation 130:Current reviews 122:Manual of style 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 796: 784: 783: 769: 768: 765:volunteer list 761: 758: 755: 746: 743: 742: 741: 735: 732: 722: 716:Closure script 713: 712: 706: 703: 695: 680: 671: 670: 655: 644:|archive = N}} 623: 620: 592: 589: 588: 587: 580: 553: 552: 544: 536: 531: 526: 518: 513: 505: 497: 491: 447: 446: 439: 436: 433: 409: 406: 405: 404: 397: 382: 367: 364: 357: 354: 321: 318: 312: 309: 274: 273: 266: 258: 253: 249: 248: 246: 245: 238: 231: 223: 220: 219: 218: 217: 212: 207: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 189:Closure policy 186: 181: 176: 168: 167: 163: 162: 161: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 132: 131: 127: 126: 125: 124: 119: 114: 109: 101: 100: 96: 95: 87: 86: 83: 82: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 59: 54: 52: 47: 45: 40: 38: 33: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 795: 780: 778: 774: 766: 762: 759: 756: 753: 749: 748: 740: 736: 733: 731: 723: 720: 719: 718: 717: 711: 707: 704: 701: 696: 693: 692:featured list 689: 685: 681: 678: 677: 676: 675: 656: 643: 631: 630: 629: 628: 619: 616: 614: 608: 606: 601: 597: 585: 581: 578: 574: 573: 572: 570: 565: 564: 563: 557: 548: 545: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 522: 519: 517: 514: 509: 506: 501: 498: 496: 493: 492: 490: 477: 476: 472: 470: 466: 461: 456: 452: 440: 437: 434: 431: 427: 424: 417: 416: 415: 414: 402: 398: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 376: 372: 368: 365: 362: 358: 355: 353: 348: 347: 346: 345: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 317: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 280: 271: 267: 264: 260: 259: 256: 244: 239: 237: 232: 230: 225: 224: 222: 221: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 202: 201: 200: 196: 195: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 165: 164: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 135: 134: 133: 129: 128: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 104: 103: 102: 98: 97: 94: 91: 90: 81: 79: 76: 74: 72: 69: 67: 65: 62: 60: 58: 55: 53: 51: 48: 46: 44: 41: 39: 37: 34: 32: 31: 27: 19: 770: 715: 714: 684:good article 673: 672: 626: 625: 617: 613:Wikiprojects 609: 603:Consult the 602: 598: 594: 566: 559: 558: 555: 546: 538: 533: 528: 520: 516:everydaylife 515: 507: 499: 494: 478: 474: 473: 457:by clicking 448: 432:and save it. 429: 419: 412: 411: 349: 344:Please note: 343: 342: 323: 314: 292:, potential 285: 284:Knowledge's 174:Instructions 50:Instructions 49: 465:reciprocity 286:peer review 210:WikiProject 93:Peer review 728:into your 652:|archive=1 648:|archive=N 311:Nominating 179:Discussion 143:Unanswered 57:Discussion 43:Unanswered 745:Reviewing 529:geography 508:philrelig 430:talk page 306:volunteer 255:Shortcuts 700:see here 646:, where 487:|topic=X 423:subst:PR 694:status. 539:engtech 534:history 500:langlit 205:Archive 78:Project 71:Archive 547:natsci 521:socsci 336:, and 263:WP:PRG 724:Copy 377:, or 298:grade 197:Other 184:Tools 64:Tools 16:< 777:here 773:here 495:arts 460:here 443:~~~~ 418:Add 401:here 302:here 153:List 138:Full 36:Main 690:or 394:FLC 392:or 390:FAC 386:GAN 340:. 308:. 158:Log 779:. 702:). 686:, 640:{{ 425:}} 421:{{ 388:, 373:, 332:, 328:, 767:. 754:. 698:( 669:. 403:. 381:. 242:e 235:t 228:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Main
Unanswered
Instructions
Discussion
Tools
Archive
Project
Peer review
Start a new article
Develop the article
Writing better articles
Manual of style
Full
Unanswered
FAC preparation
List
Log
Instructions
Discussion
Tools
Closure policy
Archive
WikiProject
Volunteers list
v
t
e
Shortcuts
WP:PRG

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.