379:"Another bright spot for the team during this time was defenceman Robyn Regehr, who became the youngest nominee ever for the Bill Masterton Memorial Trophy, which recognizes perseverance, sportsmanship and dedication to hockey, in his rookie year, despite suffering two broken legs in a car accident the previous summer" --: -->
98:
Great article, but there are a few rather dramatic statements that aren't strictly supported, like "the deal is widely believed to have been the beginning of the Flames' long decline" and "The Flames stunned the hockey world". I'm not necessarily saying the prose should be watered down, but perhaps a
484:
All links are working. The three links showing "connection refused" by the tool linked above are all pointing to legendsofhockey.net and are all currently working. It seems that the tool is being denied access, but the site is live. Please let me know if this is not what you are referring to.
375:
There appears to be quite a number of statements regarding scorelines (or series scores) but it's not immediately obvious where a reference/citation for those are. I think this verfiability aspect is important. I don't doubt the truth is presented by the editors here, but the lay reader should be
545:
seems to be an issue with the socket library in python. They have there own classification (blue) since there's nothing editors can do about these links. The timeouts length are longer for the cached (180 sec) than web version (60 sec), but it would say
376:
able to know what he/she is reading is verifiable. I can cite examples if you want but I think it's fairly clear. In the long term, erring on the side of too many inline citations would avoid silly problems like FA review by anal-rententive editors.
459:
Thanks SandyGeorgia that you took the time to comment, I always highly appreciate your feedback. But, what's an unresolved external link?? I thought it was a synonym for dead links, but I checked and there are no dead links.
241:
I've fixed the awkward dot. About the scores, I think all of them are en dashes. Should they be hyphens; I was under the impression that scores should use endashes. I will give the references more time.
82:. After spending the last day or so tightening up the references and performing one final copyedit, I believe this article is ready for Featured status. Looking forward to all feedback.
309:
513:
492:
454:
537:
479:
389:
288:
198:
148:
108:
364:
347:
330:
578:
554:
427:
415:
276:
236:
184:
172:
136:
153:
From my limited experience in FAC, just changing both statements isn't usually enough. You've gotta comb through the article for all or almost of such things.
261:
396:
Just to clarify, do you feel that more citations are needed for the scores? As for the second one, splitting it into two sentences might help. I'll fix it.
223:
Check the reference list carefully; spot check revealed, for example, missing author's name at ref. 33. Ref 29 doesn't have the site owner listed.
89:
70:
Over the past year or so, I've slowly re-written and cited this article, looking to bring it up to a similar standard of another ice hockey FA,
75:
603:
40:
420:
Checked all scores and season records. They should all be cited now. Also reworked the statement regarding Regehr a little more.
30:
17:
79:
498:
64:
266:
Checked references, will double check in the morning. Will double check the dashes as well once I have a chance.
220:
Check the hyphens in scores, such as 26-0 (26–0). Double hyphens in the table at the bottom better as en dashes.
300:
Good article, another quality piece by
Resolute. Good to see another ice hockey article going for FA status.
562:
521:
463:
399:
245:
213:
dubbed the Flames "Canada's team."—it would be eccentric for the dot to be part of the title. See MOS on
156:
120:
177:
Yeah, I caught most of it before, but did another pass-over and reworded a few more minor usage issues.
281:
Doublechecked references, they should be consistent now. Ensured all scores and records are endashes.
305:
509:
450:
56:
8:
385:
489:
424:
301:
285:
273:
194:
181:
145:
104:
86:
518:
There were three "unresponsive" links, but the webpages looked perfectly fine to me.
502:
443:
360:
343:
326:
114:
71:
501:; if you've checked them all, that's good (the tool seems to time out sometimes).
569:
528:
470:
406:
252:
231:
163:
127:
551:
381:
57:
355:
Very detailed, well cited. This one deserves a promotion to featured status.--
486:
421:
282:
270:
190:
178:
142:
100:
83:
356:
339:
322:
189:
Well, I haven't pored over every sentence, but it certainly looks good!
224:
602:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
74:. Following a final push, this article has recently completed a
321:
section was restored. Overall, this article is flaming hot.
99:
different presentation or better sources are in order.
596:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
141:I've revised both statements to be more neutral.
606:. No further edits should be made to this page.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
268:For scores, which type of dash is preferable?
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
604:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
14:
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
380:any way to make this more readable?
23:
559:Hmm, so are the links okay, then?
24:
618:
13:
1:
579:16:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
555:03:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
538:23:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
514:22:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
493:03:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
480:02:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
455:01:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
428:16:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
416:16:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
390:16:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
365:02:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
348:20:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
331:22:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
310:21:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
7:
338:: Great job on this one. -
289:17:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
277:03:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
262:02:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
237:02:20, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
199:21:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
185:18:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
173:18:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
149:17:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
137:13:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
109:06:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
90:22:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
31:featured article nomination
10:
623:
550:if that were the case. —
439:unresolved external links
78:, during which it gained
599:Please do not modify it.
548:110 Connection timed out
497:Yes, I was referring to
52:18:19, 26 January 2008.
36:Please do not modify it.
217:within quotation marks.
543:111 Connection refused
499:Check external links
65:Check external links
215:logical punctuation
80:good article status
437:Please review the
317:though I wish the
574:
533:
475:
411:
257:
168:
132:
72:New Jersey Devils
614:
601:
576:
572:
568:
565:
535:
531:
527:
524:
506:
477:
473:
469:
466:
447:
413:
409:
405:
402:
259:
255:
251:
248:
234:
229:
170:
166:
162:
159:
134:
130:
126:
123:
48:The article was
38:
622:
621:
617:
616:
615:
613:
612:
611:
610:
597:
575:
570:
563:
561:
534:
529:
522:
520:
504:
476:
471:
464:
462:
445:
412:
407:
400:
398:
258:
253:
246:
244:
232:
225:
169:
164:
157:
155:
133:
128:
121:
119:
61:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
620:
609:
608:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
567:
549:
544:
526:
482:
468:
433:
432:
431:
430:
404:
394:
393:
392:
377:
367:
350:
333:
312:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
264:
250:
221:
218:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
161:
139:
125:
115:peacock tearms
68:
67:
60:
58:Calgary Flames
55:
54:
46:
45:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
619:
607:
605:
600:
594:
593:
580:
577:
573:
566:
558:
557:
556:
553:
547:
542:
541:
540:
539:
536:
532:
525:
517:
516:
515:
511:
507:
500:
496:
495:
494:
491:
488:
483:
481:
478:
474:
467:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
442:
440:
435:
434:
429:
426:
423:
419:
418:
417:
414:
410:
403:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
374:
373:
371:
368:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:team captains
316:
313:
311:
307:
303:
302:Kaiser matias
299:
296:
290:
287:
284:
280:
279:
278:
275:
272:
269:
265:
263:
260:
256:
249:
240:
239:
238:
235:
230:
228:
222:
219:
216:
212:
211:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
186:
183:
180:
176:
175:
174:
171:
167:
160:
152:
151:
150:
147:
144:
140:
138:
135:
131:
124:
116:
112:
111:
110:
106:
102:
97:
94:
93:
92:
91:
88:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
62:
59:
53:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
598:
595:
560:
519:
461:
438:
436:
397:
369:
352:
335:
318:
314:
297:
267:
243:
226:
214:
154:
118:
95:
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
76:peer review
552:Dispenser
382:Manderiko
485:Thanks,
191:Melchoir
113:Such as
101:Melchoir
50:promoted
505:Georgia
446:Georgia
370:Comment
357:Hokeman
353:Support
340:Rjd0060
336:Support
323:GoodDay
315:Support
298:Support
96:Comment
571:(talk)
530:(talk)
472:(talk)
408:(talk)
254:(talk)
233:(talk)
165:(talk)
129:(talk)
564:Maxim
523:Maxim
503:Sandy
465:Maxim
444:Sandy
401:Maxim
247:Maxim
158:Maxim
122:Maxim
16:<
510:Talk
490:lute
487:Reso
451:Talk
425:lute
422:Reso
386:talk
361:talk
344:talk
327:talk
306:talk
286:lute
283:Reso
274:lute
271:Reso
227:Tony
195:talk
182:lute
179:Reso
146:lute
143:Reso
105:talk
87:lute
84:Reso
512:)
453:)
388:)
372::
363:)
346:)
329:)
308:)
242:--
197:)
117:?
107:)
33:.
508:(
449:(
441:.
384:(
359:(
342:(
325:(
304:(
193:(
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.