313:
a little more than a dictionary definition; unfortunately, what it adds to the definition is not encyclopedia material. We get an argument-from-etymology fallacy, a bit of personal opinion, and a paragraph of "I, too, majored in
Western Lit". It's all unsourced (tagged as such since 2012!), and if
384:), but "erudition" isn't exactly any one of them, while the vague place in between is not a real standalone topic. The page views as well as the unhelpfulness of most search results suggest that it's worth keeping around as a redirect.
339:. Sure needs some attention and sources, but other than that a perfectly valid and relevant article to exist. I also disagree with the sentiment that none of the current content is usable. Why exactly not? --
198:
372:, considering the alternatives to deletion. It's a word whose meaning has some interesting nuances, good for a dictionary, but not an article. There are various related topics (
192:
418:
per XOR'easter. Soft redirects are appropriate only if they are useful to users of the encyclopedia, which I see no evidence for, otherwise this is a case wher
159:
393:
362:
331:
410:
348:
294:
262:
437:
282:
274:
123:
86:
115:
106:
67:
91:
237:. It's not readily apparent to me that either the term "erudition" or the concept of erudition itself are notable topics passing
254:
213:
180:
61:
100:
79:
17:
132:
127:
353:
Because it's meandering, unsourced, personal opinion. Not a line of it lives up to encyclopedic standards.
174:
136:
96:
52:. Clear consensus not to retain article, no consensus and a level of disagreement about a soft redirect.
141:
119:
170:
454:
40:
75:
153:
220:
389:
381:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
450:
449:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
358:
327:
36:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
8:
149:
230:
186:
406:
385:
344:
66:
229:
Article discusses only the term "erudition", not the topic of erudition itself. See
145:
433:
354:
323:
57:
206:
315:
290:
270:
250:
423:
241:. Even if such a case can be made, none of the current content is useable, so
419:
319:
306:
242:
238:
402:
377:
340:
234:
427:
53:
286:
266:
246:
373:
445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
314:
sources for the claims of fact were dug up, it would be
205:
233:. Article is entirely unreferenced and seems to be
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
457:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions
283:list of Education-related deletion discussions
219:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
322:would amount to rewriting it from scratch.
318:. Improving the article to the point where
14:
23:
24:
469:
422:specifically does not apply: see
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
13:
1:
7:
399:Soft redirect to Wiktionary
370:Soft redirect to Wiktionary
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
10:
474:
349:07:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
332:15:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
320:it would be worth keeping
295:14:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
275:14:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
255:14:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
447:Please do not modify it.
438:11:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
411:05:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
394:10:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
363:17:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
62:01:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
382:Liberal arts education
80:Articles for deletion
436:
297:
277:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
465:
432:
280:
260:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
473:
472:
468:
467:
466:
464:
463:
462:
461:
455:deletion review
429:Charles Stewart
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
471:
460:
459:
441:
440:
413:
396:
367:
366:
365:
334:
299:
298:
278:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
470:
458:
456:
452:
448:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
430:
425:
421:
417:
414:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
308:
304:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
446:
444:
428:
415:
398:
386:Adumbrativus
378:Intellectual
369:
336:
310:
302:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
424:WP:R#DELETE
231:WP:NOTADICT
193:free images
355:XOR'easter
324:XOR'easter
451:talk page
374:Education
245:applies.
116:Erudition
68:Erudition
37:talk page
453:or in a
316:WP:SYNTH
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
403:4meter4
341:Gharren
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
434:(talk)
420:WP:ATD
416:Delete
307:WP:TNT
303:Delete
243:WP:TNT
239:WP:GNG
171:Google
137:delete
54:Daniel
50:delete
309:. It
287:Daask
267:Daask
247:Daask
235:WP:OR
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
426:. —
407:talk
390:talk
359:talk
345:talk
337:Keep
328:talk
305:per
291:talk
271:talk
251:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
221:TWL
158:– (
409:)
392:)
380:,
376:,
361:)
347:)
330:)
311:is
293:)
285:.
273:)
265:.
253:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
405:(
401:.
388:(
357:(
343:(
326:(
289:(
269:(
249:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.