1299:
1244:. When I read the article, I actually didn't think it read like a "star struck adoration," but if you point me to passages where the language is a problem, I'd be happy to give them a copy edit from my non-fan perspective. I do assure you that I'm not a Murphy fangirl ;) I also have fixed a lot of the sourcing. Please let me know what else I can do to help get this over the line. I'm not quite as attached to the article as its nominator (or as exhausted from looking at it for weeks), so hopefully I can help us find the middle ground. Thanks for your patience. Cheers! --
1263:
1840:
1013:
31:
810:
2341:
479:
668:. I deleted it as soon as I saw it. Also, the info that was moved was not limited to that section alone though. He also copied the "Kafir women" section and others... I'm gonna start pressing on him there -- just wanted to let you know cause this might turn into a similar issue as before. Only difference: as far as I can tell, the rest of the article (minus his/her changes) is fine.
2465:
2434:
171:
series of paintings spanning practically a whole decade. . ." Then, I see you asking me to remove many images and have even removed one yourself that I believe are important. I think the article would optimally have about 35 images in the gallery including all 25 1890 harvest images and all 5 1888 harvest images. Note the
2250:
Thanks for voting in my Rfa, which I withdrew from yesterday. Though I did not get promoted, I see this Rfa as being a success nonetheless. What I got out of this Rfa will help me to be a better, all around editor. Because of this Rfa I have decided to become better in other areas of editing. I'm not
2044:
article. Although you addressed the issue with the synopsis in the context of the GA review, your suggestion has left me with a question still, so I wondered if you'd be able to point me in the right direction? You wrote that you'd prefer to see citations for synopses, but recognised that the project
155:
Several reasons: 1. I do a better job of reviewing subjects I am interested in or have some prior knowledge. 2. I figured that since you made your request, someone had or will shortly take it up. 3. I usually only take up reviews for backlog reasons when they appear in the backlog template, since if
2320:
I removed the see also links you inserted. While I think you inserted them in good faith, there's no connection between Craig and Curtis at all, other than that they're both involved in sex scandals - and we don't "see also" list everyone who's ever been in one. The article's in the category for sex
963:
Ack, got tangled in a ton of edit conflicts. Only completed processes are added to the template; if it's on hold, it's not failed, and shouldn't be added at all. Only failed or listed are added; right now, it's showing as failed. Is that what you intend, or is it on hold? If you're going to do a
891:
It does not look right to me to emphasize on the wooden bowl in another image. - The wooden bowl is already shown in the
Japanese equipment image. - Wooden bowl is nothing special between all types of equipments - Chinese / Korean / Japanese are more or less the same. - The key difference to mention
170:
I am having a problem with your review. The third sentence of the article says. "The title refers primarily to a twenty-five canvas series (Wildenstein Index Number 1266-1290) begun in the summer of 1890, using that year's grain harvest.". Then, in section three of your review you say ". . . for a
2090:
I just want to say thanks again for the review. I really am sorry if you were offended by my overeagerness. I'd been having a bit of a rough day, and we'd been working on the article together for going on a couple months. It all built up, and I guess you had to pay for it. It was probably a bit out
2070:
might need a cite, but rather, suppose we've got an air-tight, painfully objective, non-interpretive description for our summary of the events of the play (or novel or whatever): and you wanted to provide a citation for that, in deference to the most minute guidelines, etc. What would you cite? Are
756:
Yes, Yomangani is gone; he never clearly stated why, but I've got my ideas. Several of us split up his 30-plus featured articles and lists to add them to our watchlists so they won't deteriorate. I took Beagle and Laika and a few others, but I'm not a Beagle or Laika expert. I know there's a big
636:
Please take another look if you would. I've made changes to the article to address some of your concerns. Another user, who has well over a dozen FAs to his credit, so would presumably know a bit about what makes articles good, also did some work and gave his views. Thanks. I still feel it will not
2281:
Thank you for your recent comments and vote at my
Request for Adminship. It was not successful. I don't believe this is unfortunate as it leaves me with much to ponder and a fresh slate from which I can better myself as an editor in order to be more compliant with the policies that are expected by
871:
Just mentioning this here because, well, I don't think it's sensible to expect you to watch the Peer review page in the hope I'll reply. I've tried to punch up the lead a bit and I think it's a bit more exciting now. I'm not sure about the popular culture section myself - it only appeared a couple
175:
says "The series is known for its thematic use of repetition to show differences in perception of light across various times of day, seasons, and types of weather." Remvoing images makes the juxtapposition unclear. For example, the image you removed is quite important in contrast to the adjacent
2116:
Sorry I didn't get back to you before, but thanks for getting the review done. I know most of the articles put up for GA are bad. I think I've done 5-7 reviews and failed everyone, most quick fail. To avoid that with articles I nominate I have Katr67 copyedit them first and give feedback. As to a
573:
Sir, I see you are very strong in your convictions. If you honestly believe I am a vandal, then explain to me the precise nature of my vandalism instead of leaving harsh comments on my talk page. To date, I have not said a single unkind thing to you or any other user and yet you persist in being
2059:
Thanks for your response. Sorry if it seems like I'm pressing a point--not for an argument, truly, but to understand your position. I do follow you in the distinction between description and interpretation; though there aren't really objective criteria upon which we might draw the line, since a
2365:
The current queue for sportspersons is about 5 weeks and the election is 3 days away. The time sensitive information will be cleared up by the time the article is going to be seriously evaluated. If you like I will wait until after next
Tuesday's election, but was anxious to get this in the
2223:
article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very
682:
Sir, relating to my edits from the other day that seemed to cause you dissatisfaction, I would just like to express my regret that these have caused you grief. I sensed a degree of cynicism in your reply to me. I feel further remorse to have elicited such a negative reaction. As a token of my
544:
Sir, I take exception to your suggestion that my good faith edits are vandalism. Troll my user page if it pleases you, but do not presume to sully my good name with such slurs. I offer you no harm nor inconvenience, and yet, you have taken it upon yourself to scold me like a small child for
921:
Of course I know Bush hasn't directly amended the text of the constitution, he just ignored it with the
Patriot Act (which is what is pointed by the user box) and overturned constitutional rights. There is at least one decision where federal courts declared parts of the act uncostitutional
360:
Were you to read edits before reverting them, you would notice that no information was deleted, only consolidated and made more precise. Your comment that Asana is a promotional catalogue for Yoga is absurd. The simple fact is that it a poorly written, misinformed and agenda-driven
898:
The reason I change the original image is that it is NOT showing a hollow+flat stone. It is not a Yunzi (maybe a very special variation produced by the Yunzi factory, in fact I own one myself but I do not like it). Putting it here is not a good representation of the topic.
964:
lot of these, you should get Dr pda's article history script, so you can get the oldids, etc. The old events like peer reviews and AFDs have to be added in order. If it's on hold, you should delete event3 and leave current status blank so it doesn't show as failed. Best,
737:
since
Yomangani's gone? I'm watching five of his articles to make sure they don't deteriorate, but I don't know much about beagles. Someone just made a lot of edits, and I restored most to Yomangani's version, since I know how careful he was about the caps issue.
757:
deal about capitalization of species, and I've followed those debates, so when someone changed all the caps, I changed them back. And I know
Yomangani was careful to set up the section headings in a way that wouldn't be a POV magnet, so I also changed them back.
948:
is the version that needs to be sourced. If you look at it, it may change your mind on the AFD. What has happened here is that Merle (and/or someone sympathetic to him) is trying to cover up some of the dumber things he has done in the past.
2091:
of line, and I think what I wrote came off worse than I intended. I meant it to be a kind of friendly nudge. Anyway, thanks for helping with the process and feel free to continue to comment anytime, of course. It's wikipedia, after all.
1757:
Thanks VT! I'm playing catch-up trying to get interviews I transcribed posted; I'm only about five behind now. Glad you liked it. Some
Spanish magazine is going to translate it and publish it, so that's good news for Wikinews. Dave
902:
Lastly, the image does not violates any copyright rules here. I just link this to the original image shown in the
Chinese version, it which it says explicitly that the photo is taken by the author whom does give up the copyright of it.
1779:
Thanks for taking the Hamlet review! I was wondering if you could do it soon. We're aiming for FA, and are eager to move through the Ga process to pick up loose ends on the way to FA. Thanks again! Usually you have to wait for weeks.
368:
You seem to take both yourself and
Knowledge very seriously. Do you want to be associated with an article on philosphy that spells it filosofy...or misrepresents the names and applications of postures so completely? I'd think not.
1627:
I have added some lines and citations in the alternative treatmens section on tai chi, yoga and exercise following your advise. I have also nominated the article as FA. If you feel is good enough you will be welcomed to vote it.
1486:
I'm really sorry, I was kind of worked up. I am finding it difficult to understand all of Lara's arguments but I don't want to inflame the situation. Struck and revised. Thanks. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 06:43, 28 September 2007
591:
You're wasting your time. You've already vandalized after your 4th warning, so you're toast. And don't act coy, adding a picture of a porn shop to a church article isn't helpful, and neither were any of your other edits.
545:
endeavoring to contribute to the body of human knowledge in no different manner than yourself. I disagree with you sir, but I would dearly advocate for your right to say it were the tables reversed. Respectfully yours,
697:
Hi, VanTucky; just a note, because it doesn't seem like the GA Project informs editors passing GAs how to update article history, so they frequently show up in the error category. When you pass a GA and update the
2449:, which passed with 54 supports, 2 opposes and 3 neutrals. Thanks for your support, I really appreciate it. I hope to exceed expectations, If you have any advice please feel free to let me know. Thanks again!. --
2066:, the synopsis went through a long process of just that kind, to banish every instance that wasn't absolutely factual and supported by the text, as much as we could hope to.) But my question wasn't so much about
2049:, what kind of thing would you expect to see cited? Maybe I'm just being a little slow... could you point me to an example or indicate what kind of work you would have cited if you had written it? Many thanks,
611:
304:
falsely indicated a redundancy in grammatical construction. However, the addition is important because it establishes the point that the very existence of the phenomenon has no basis in scientific consensus.
655:
1370:
2071:
you thinking of a note that points to the relevant part of the original work? Or are you saying that we'd have to go, say, to the Cliff Notes, look at its copyrighted summary, compare and cite
1442:
My point was to inform you that it was rude. You could think about it, then apologize. I have seen this happening before. For example, there was the following dialogue on the talk page of
2284:
If you feel that there is anything that was not covered by the RfA that I need improvement in, I would implore your input and feedback as I hope and intend to improve as best I'm guided.
1506:
I just read your latest comment. I'm glad you're not mad at me, but saying that you don't want to hear what I have to say and that my opinion is superfluous makes it look like you are.
2202:
672:
1386:
630:
2117:
heads up, I'll see, though I have a general aversion to preferential treatment, it just looks kinda bad. Also, thanks for the vandalism barnstar, and watch out for the
Zorcons!
156:
I'm going to expend my energies on subjects which I would not normally review for reasons of clearing the backlog, it's only logical to start with the most dire areas of need.
2187:
1379:
708:
template, if you scroll to the bottom of the talk page, the error category will be highlighted in red if the articlehistory is incomplete. I fixed and removed the errors at
2209:
2197:
1311:
This is a much better article now than if you'd passed it when I first thought you should have. Thanks for your high standards, and thanks for the image reorganization. ++
441:
1929:
1147:
1094:
1361:
apparingly seems not to be that happy about the page protection. I am monitoring the article, in any case. Feel free to ask me for any kind of help in case you need. --
1941:
1924:
1900:
1159:
1142:
466:
1936:
1154:
1111:
319:
Thanks for the deletion nom on Hindukush Kafir people! It was sorely needed! Interestingly enough, Sze_cavalry01 has already started offering up personal attacks on
1240:
Hi VanTucky, for some reason I've decided to help on the Cillian Murphy FAC. Regarding the blue eyes, I'd ask you to consider the evidence from my research here:
1118:
1074:
2079:
442:
2293:
1917:
1130:
1082:
320:
506:
383:
1905:
1533:
1087:
907:
380:
370:
1540:. After reading that, I'm sure that I won't have to tell you to watch for it being put up for deletion again, if this deletion review doesn't come out as
1099:
684:
575:
546:
2418:
1614:
1597:
994:
750:
687:
227:
2298:
2060:
report by its nature selects and that selection involves interpretation of a kind; but there's probably a common-sense, consensus approach to that. (Re:
1135:
1341:
2225:
2021:
1229:
1106:
601:
578:
564:
612:
309:
199:
165:
2288:
2053:
1971:
1912:
1189:
1123:
350:
334:
1602:
Well, I'm glad you took the time to cite policy instead of send me to AN/I or something. Haha. If you need your coffee warmed feel free to stop by.
531:
500:
2446:
1827:
1328:
1000:
939:
858:
1382:
of the article in response to the points you made – let's continue this discussion there. Can I persuade you to reconsider your decision? Cheers,
1632:
1529:
881:
2274:
1646:, copied it for discussion. Sounds extremely interesting but I cannot find any sources that Catahoulas are in South America. No need to reply.
788:
787:, and he appears to be edit warring with a floating ISP, who is actually making some sincere difference in the article. D7 is way past 3RR. --
406:
314:
1808:
1799:
1713:
2389:
256:
1747:
1537:
815:
677:
290:
2240:
2168:
2105:
1817:
1548:
1510:
1429:
1416:
549:
436:
2011:
1507:
1426:
1413:
1400:
1353:
I am the admin who protected the article. As you are the user who asked for fully protecting it, I'd suggest you to discuss the issue on
1219:
2251:
going to just be a vandalfighter. Though vandalfighting is good, being active in all areas of editing is even better. Have a nice day.--
976:
649:
400:
409:
1365:
769:
727:
373:
2335:
1975:
1298:
1193:
286:
Randi demonstrated that magic tricks can be used to do many things reported as psychic phenomena. There's nothing non-NPOV about it.
149:
1650:
1622:
1337:
article due to being uncited and having POV issues was returned by its author. Looks like we need to address this user about this.
1248:
933:
276:
1665:
1579:
1274:
892:
is that there are 2 species of Go stones - both side hollow and one hollow and one flat (the most representative on is Yunzi).
796:
953:
801:
Thanks for your interactive efforts in the review process and your editorial tweaks. You may want to display this somewhere.
2325:
2027:
1967:
1963:
1769:
1396:
1185:
1181:
713:
295:
1520:
683:
sincerity, please note that I have refrained from further controversial edits so as not to offend. Thank you for being you.
176:
image. I think you are missing several point. I have never done this, but do you think I could request another reviewer?--
2182:
448:
Thank you for reviewing it. We've addressed all of your suggestions. Feel free to review it again whenever you're ready. --
2121:
791:
2352:
863:
97:
89:
84:
2095:
618:
Please see same, where I have replied. I think summary failure is unwarranted, and a hold would be a better approach. ++
2405:
2376:
2155:
1883:
1684:
1056:
845:
214:
186:
136:
72:
67:
59:
1585:
You know I was just giving you grief. I actually thought the addition was funny, but it of course OR :) Or is it....?
246:
1721:
1403:
1262:
417:
2409:
2380:
2357:
2159:
1784:
1323:
849:
218:
190:
140:
115:
2255:
2413:
2384:
2163:
1409:
982:
ah, caught up, read the talk page, see it was previously failed, so it looks good now, should be all set. Best,
853:
520:
489:
455:
389:
222:
194:
144:
1241:
664:
has moved the info that was in the "Kafir Characteristics" section of "Hindukush Kafir people" to the article,
2424:
1463:
I think that saying that her English is terrible was rude and unnecessary. A.Z. 06:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
2126:
1371:
1958:
1567:
Man, the deletionist in you really is quick with that undo button. Have you ever been on a space station!?
1176:
539:
1664:. He's a pretty famous dude but given his surname is offensive in its entirety, shouldn't someone contact
958:
405:
yeah, I do know about the signature, but I forgot that one time. Sorry, and thanks for the other tips. --
1839:
1012:
281:
38:
1726:
Hey, thanks for all your help. When you get the chance do you think you could look at my question at
1637:
1320:
1235:
692:
646:
627:
418:
262:
733:
No problem, I make the same mistake often, so I check the error category :-) Hey, are you watching
204:
It seems you have not been on WP much of the day. I have asked for a 2nd opinion on the GAC page.--
2224:
grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at
1346:
913:
105:
47:
17:
2229:
2214:
2205:
are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue.
1279:
872:
hours ago - so I've added a request that reviewers give their opinion on it in the peer review.
825:
702:
355:
2401:
2372:
2151:
1608:
1591:
1573:
1536:. I felt that you may want to lend your voice about this topic in its deletion review as well.
990:
972:
938:
841:
765:
746:
723:
709:
210:
182:
132:
2287:
All the best in your own endeavours in the real world, and also when you're not on Knowledge.
2330:
2139:
1643:
1354:
306:
287:
945:
2453:
2076:
2050:
926:). So, at least one court has reverted part of his edits (vandalisms?), which is good. ;-)
510:
8:
2315:
2085:
2017:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
1763:
1740:
1378:
Hi, thanks for taking the time to review the above article. I've posted a message in the
1225:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
923:
515:
509:, you're right; "yanki" is just the Latin American way of spelling "yankee". Please read
484:
450:
2206:
1981:
1553:
1362:
1358:
1199:
774:
661:
2396:
2367:
2178:
Thanks for the Barnstar! I'm pleased to know that my work at RFPP is appreciated! :)
2173:
2146:
1804:
Thanks. I think we've responded to everything already. Have a look at the talk page.
1603:
1586:
1568:
983:
965:
878:
836:
820:
758:
739:
716:
637:
be a problem to get the concerns you have with the article resolved within a week. ++
205:
177:
127:
123:
111:
2132:
918:
Yes, I agree, it's an amusing user box! Feel free to copy it just like I copied it!
267:
I am VanTucky on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/VanTucky. Thanks. --
2118:
1655:
1391:
1347:
665:
345:
329:
237:
119:
1253:
864:
242:
Thanks for your message. I see that my leniency toward Frikkers was in vain --
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2358:
2322:
2245:
2179:
2111:
1985:
1774:
1752:
1731:
1697:
travesty of a disambig page. Ok, I guess you can see what I'm saying here ;) -
1661:
1647:
1561:
1203:
930:
525:
494:
460:
301:
172:
1727:
2188:
1791:
1629:
1316:
1245:
642:
623:
593:
556:
433:
397:
268:
157:
2220:
1545:
1383:
1338:
1283:
950:
427:
It has been outstanding on the GA nomination page since 12 September 2007.
379:
Thanks for the clarification and validation. It was still a blind edit. --
252:
Thanks very much for the barnstar. It was very kind of you. Take care --
394:
I'll make sure I do that. Sorry, I just started reviewing articles today.
2018:
2004:
1698:
1669:
1226:
784:
779:
Hey...I'm guessing you're an admin. How do I get an article protected?
669:
574:
unkind to me. I don't understand. All I ask is that you please be civil.
362:
340:
339:
The delete went through! Thanks for your help in dealing with that pill!
324:
2145:
template. What do you think of my change to the picture arrangement.--
1873:
1046:
472:
Thank you for your time. BTW, thanks for the compliments on the table;
253:
243:
809:
2102:
2101:
Yep, now that I read it gain it really didn't come off right. Sorry.
2092:
1814:
1805:
1781:
2345:
2252:
1334:
1312:
638:
619:
2010:
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
1218:
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
1443:
2201:
of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published.
2062:
2040:
2030:
1538:
More on what may happen concerning this topic is discussed here
734:
1813:
I've responded to your concerns. Please see my comments soon.
1333:
The Anal sex and evolution section that you got rid of in the
2270:
1694:
780:
613:
Talk:SS_Christopher_Columbus#Failed "good_article" nomination
2464:
2433:
2340:
1896:
1131:
News and notes: Historian dies, Wiki Wednesdays, milestones
1069:
886:
656:"Hindukush Kafir people" information moved to a new article.
478:
1948:
1876:
1858:
1834:
1166:
1049:
1031:
1007:
1560:
There are proposals to use guinea pig meat as a staple on
1119:
License edits under consideration to accommodate Knowledge
1642:
Knowing you have an interest... I removed a paragraph on
1528:, I'm alerting all of the editors that took part in the
895:
And your reasoning seems changing from time to time...
365:, among others) article which needs some serious work.
2395:
P.S. Should this be in sportspersons or politicians?--
1906:
Biographies of living people grow into "status symbol"
2075:? Or something else? Sorry to pester you with this.
443:
Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional (Puerto Rico)
1530:
the deletion debate for the article Adult-child sex
2226:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta
323:. They are all unfounded - just frustrating! Ugh!
1918:News and notes: Wikipedian Robert Braunwart dies
1095:Wikimedia Commons reaches two million media files
555:Nonsense and joke edits are vandalism. period.
2228:. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable.
1532:that it is now a deletion review, as seen in
1564:, but as of 2007 this has not been attempted.
1937:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
1155:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
1913:WikiWorld comic: "George Stroumboulopoulos"
783:appeears to be under constant onslaught by
424:Would you review this film for GA status ?
2038:Hello. Many thanks for your review of the
2438:
2321:scandals already. I think that's enough.
1925:WikiProject Report: League of Copyeditors
1242:Talk:Cillian Murphy#Cillian.27s blue eyes
1890:
1790:No problem, it was next in line anyway.
1329:An unsourced section that was deemed POV
1072:
1063:
2275:What is meant to be and what is not...
1999:Sorry for the tardiness in sending the
1374:: Quick-fail of Good Article nomination
1075:From the editor: Brion Vibber interview
513:for more information. Happy editing! --
14:
2445:Thank you for voicing your opinion in
315:Thanks for the nomination for deletion
300:Your revert of my edit to the lead of
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2414:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
2385:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
2164:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
1290:without everyone's help, it's really
1107:Community sanction noticeboard closed
854:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
346:
330:
223:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
195:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
145:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
2045:doesn't require them. Well, if they
1728:Durham School of the Art's talk page
1143:WikiProject Report: Military history
1100:San Francisco job openings published
1083:Wikimania 2008 awarded to Alexandria
906:I am open for further discussion.
804:
678:Please accept my sincerest apologies
25:
2131:I see you have moved some images.
1425:Are you mad at me for some reason?
1112:Bot is approved to delete redirects
1088:Board meeting held, budget approved
114:GA review. I was curious why when
23:
2425:Knowledge has a new administrator!
1838:
1011:
511:Yankee#In other parts of the world
24:
2479:
1901:Fundraiser opens, budget released
1124:WikiWorld comic: "Soramimi Kashi"
2463:
2432:
2339:
2135:does not say anything about the
1942:The Report on Lengthy Litigation
1623:Therapies for multiple sclerosis
1297:
1261:
1160:The Report on Lengthy Litigation
808:
477:
29:
2264:Click "show" to see my message.
1831:updated for October 22nd, 2007.
1004:updated for October 15th, 2007.
910:13:44, 14 October 2007 (GMT+8)
122:reviewed, you instead reviewed
1399:was rude. That's all, really.
797:Haystacks (Monet) - GA finally
110:Hey! Thanks for starting the
13:
1:
2266:
296:Phenomenonology vs. existence
126:. Is it expertise related?--
2431:
2419:04:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
2390:04:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
2353:14:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
2326:00:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
2299:14:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
2256:22:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
2241:10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
2210:01:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
2191:Newsletter for November 2007
2183:23:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2169:22:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2122:02:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2106:01:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2096:01:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2080:00:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2054:23:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2022:15:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
1871:
1818:23:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
1809:23:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1800:22:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1785:21:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1770:04:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1748:23:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1714:04:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1685:04:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1651:15:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1633:13:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1615:18:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1598:18:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1580:05:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1549:20:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1511:04:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
1430:04:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
1417:04:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
1404:04:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
1387:23:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
1372:Matthew Bourne's The Car Man
1366:19:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
1342:18:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1324:23:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
1294:how we all pulled together.
1249:04:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
1230:10:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
1044:
995:02:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
977:02:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
954:05:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
934:11:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
882:21:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
859:14:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
792:10:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
770:19:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
751:19:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
728:03:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
688:01:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
673:21:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
650:00:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
631:15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
602:04:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
579:04:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
565:04:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
550:04:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
532:23:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
501:23:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
467:21:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
437:08:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
410:00:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
351:15:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
7:
2462:
2262:
1979:
1881:
1197:
1054:
401:23:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
384:20:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
374:19:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
335:14:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
310:02:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
291:02:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
277:02:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
257:00:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
247:02:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
228:20:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
200:15:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
166:19:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
150:14:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
10:
2484:
2280:
1956:
1866:
1668:and have him change it? -
1521:It's now a deletion review
1174:
1039:
2189:WikiProject Good Articles
1992:
1951:
1940:
1935:
1928:
1923:
1916:
1911:
1904:
1899:
1861:
1722:Durham School of the Arts
1210:
1169:
1158:
1153:
1146:
1141:
1134:
1129:
1122:
1117:
1110:
1105:
1098:
1093:
1086:
1081:
1034:
419:Casino Royale (1967 film)
1272:Thanks for your help in
18:User talk:Steven Walling
1544:. I'll see you around.
1280:SS Christopher Columbus
924:USA_PATRIOT_Act#_note-2
390:Thanks for your message
1844:
1843:The Knowledge Signpost
1489:
1465:
1286:. She would have been
1017:
1016:The Knowledge Signpost
710:Talk:Haystacks (Monet)
2127:Man Enters the Cosmos
1842:
1644:Catahoula Leopard Dog
1484:
1461:
1355:Talk:Nuristani people
1136:Wikimedia in the News
1015:
875:Thanks for the help!
42:of past discussions.
540:With all due respect
2455:¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤
2344:. Hope this helps,
2198:November 2007 issue
1930:Features and admins
1542:Overturn and delete
1284:Good Article status
1148:Features and admins
826:good article status
1884:About the Signpost
1868:Volume 3, Issue 43
1845:
1359:User:Sze cavalry01
1057:About the Signpost
1041:Volume 3, Issue 42
1018:
505:Oh, and regarding
282:Randi demonstrated
2471:
2470:
2460:
2417:
2388:
2313:
2312:
2309:
2308:
2305:
2304:
2167:
2024:
1997:
1996:
1988:
1947:
1946:
1895:
1894:
1854:
1853:
1745:
1693:And there's also
1638:Catahoula Leopard
1611:
1594:
1576:
1348:Nuristani people
1309:
1308:
1305:
1269:
1236:re Cillian Murphy
1232:
1215:
1214:
1206:
1165:
1164:
1068:
1067:
1027:
1026:
959:GA articlehistory
857:
832:
831:
821:Haystacks (Monet)
693:GA ArticleHistory
321:the deletion page
263:IRC cloak request
226:
198:
148:
124:Haystacks (Monet)
112:Haystacks (Monet)
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2475:
2467:
2458:
2456:
2450:
2436:
2429:
2428:
2399:
2370:
2350:
2343:
2296:
2291:
2271:
2267:
2265:
2260:
2259:
2238:
2237:
2149:
2144:
2138:
2009:
1980:
1976:Single-Page View
1949:
1897:
1859:
1850:
1835:
1796:
1766:
1761:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1612:
1610:
1595:
1593:
1577:
1575:
1412:was quite rude.
1303:
1301:
1277:
1267:
1265:
1258:
1257:
1217:
1198:
1194:Single-Page View
1167:
1070:
1032:
1023:
1008:
987:
969:
914:Bush userbox....
839:
812:
805:
762:
743:
720:
707:
701:
666:Nuristani people
598:
561:
528:
523:
518:
497:
492:
487:
481:
463:
458:
453:
348:
343:
332:
327:
307:ScienceApologist
288:ScienceApologist
273:
208:
180:
162:
130:
120:Chicago Marathon
116:I asked for help
106:GA review choice
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2454:
2452:
2443:
2427:
2363:
2346:
2333:
2318:
2294:
2289:
2263:
2248:
2234:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
2231:
2230:
2217:
2215:Preity Zinta FA
2193:
2176:
2142:
2136:
2129:
2114:
2088:
2077:DionysosProteus
2051:DionysosProteus
2036:
1848:Weekly Delivery
1846:
1833:
1794:
1777:
1764:
1759:
1755:
1741:
1732:
1724:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1658:
1640:
1625:
1609:
1592:
1574:
1556:
1523:
1394:
1376:
1351:
1331:
1304:anchors aweigh!
1273:
1256:
1238:
1021:Weekly Delivery
1019:
1006:
985:
967:
961:
943:
916:
889:
869:
865:Thespis (opera)
833:
818:helped promote
799:
777:
760:
741:
718:
705:
699:
695:
680:
660:Unfortunately,
658:
616:
596:
559:
542:
526:
521:
516:
495:
490:
485:
461:
456:
451:
446:
422:
392:
358:
356:Blind reversion
341:
325:
317:
298:
284:
271:
265:
240:
160:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2481:
2469:
2468:
2461:
2444:
2439:
2437:
2426:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2362:
2359:Greg Skrepenak
2356:
2332:
2329:
2317:
2314:
2311:
2310:
2307:
2306:
2303:
2302:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2247:
2244:
2219:Hi there. The
2216:
2213:
2192:
2186:
2175:
2172:
2128:
2125:
2113:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2087:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2035:
2026:
2003:this week. --
1995:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1989:
1978:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1945:
1944:
1939:
1933:
1932:
1927:
1921:
1920:
1915:
1909:
1908:
1903:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1888:
1887:
1880:
1870:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1856:
1852:
1851:
1832:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1776:
1773:
1754:
1751:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1688:
1687:
1657:
1654:
1639:
1636:
1624:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1562:space stations
1555:
1552:
1522:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1420:
1419:
1393:
1390:
1375:
1369:
1350:
1345:
1330:
1327:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1295:
1278:the good ship
1270:
1266:
1255:
1252:
1237:
1234:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1196:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1151:
1150:
1145:
1139:
1138:
1133:
1127:
1126:
1121:
1115:
1114:
1109:
1103:
1102:
1097:
1091:
1090:
1085:
1079:
1078:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1053:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1005:
999:
998:
997:
960:
957:
942:
940:Merle Terlesky
937:
915:
912:
908:Horace.wk.chan
888:
885:
868:
862:
830:
829:
813:
803:
798:
795:
776:
773:
754:
753:
703:articlehistory
694:
691:
679:
676:
657:
654:
653:
652:
615:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
584:
583:
582:
581:
568:
567:
541:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
445:
440:
421:
416:
414:
391:
388:
387:
386:
381:75.195.130.190
371:75.195.130.190
357:
354:
316:
313:
302:parapsychology
297:
294:
283:
280:
264:
261:
260:
259:
239:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2480:
2466:
2459:
2457:
2448:
2442:
2435:
2430:
2420:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2398:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2369:
2360:
2355:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2342:
2337:
2331:Your question
2328:
2327:
2324:
2301:
2300:
2297:
2292:
2285:
2279:
2273:
2272:
2269:
2268:
2261:
2258:
2257:
2254:
2243:
2242:
2239:
2236:
2235:
2227:
2222:
2212:
2211:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2190:
2185:
2184:
2181:
2171:
2170:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2148:
2141:
2134:
2133:WP:MOS#Images
2124:
2123:
2120:
2107:
2104:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2094:
2081:
2078:
2074:
2069:
2065:
2064:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2033:
2032:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2016:
2014:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1955:
1950:
1943:
1938:
1934:
1931:
1926:
1922:
1919:
1914:
1910:
1907:
1902:
1898:
1889:
1886:
1885:
1879:
1878:
1875:
1869:
1865:
1860:
1857:
1849:
1841:
1837:
1836:
1830:
1819:
1816:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1807:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1783:
1772:
1771:
1768:
1767:
1750:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1737:
1735:
1729:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1667:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1653:
1652:
1649:
1645:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1616:
1613:
1607:
1606:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1590:
1589:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1563:
1551:
1550:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1512:
1509:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1488:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1431:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1398:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1222:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1161:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1113:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1030:
1022:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1003:
996:
992:
988:
981:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
956:
955:
952:
947:
941:
936:
935:
932:
927:
925:
919:
911:
909:
904:
900:
896:
893:
884:
883:
880:
876:
873:
866:
861:
860:
855:
851:
847:
843:
838:
827:
823:
822:
817:
814:
811:
807:
806:
802:
794:
793:
790:
786:
782:
772:
771:
767:
763:
752:
748:
744:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
714:
711:
704:
690:
689:
686:
685:72.225.36.158
675:
674:
671:
667:
663:
662:Sze_cavalry01
651:
648:
644:
640:
635:
634:
633:
632:
629:
625:
621:
614:
603:
600:
599:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
580:
577:
576:72.225.36.158
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
563:
562:
554:
553:
552:
551:
548:
547:72.225.36.158
533:
530:
529:
524:
519:
512:
508:
504:
503:
502:
499:
498:
493:
488:
480:
475:
471:
470:
469:
468:
465:
464:
459:
454:
444:
439:
438:
435:
431:
428:
425:
420:
415:
412:
411:
408:
403:
402:
399:
395:
385:
382:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
366:
364:
353:
352:
349:
344:
337:
336:
333:
328:
322:
312:
311:
308:
303:
293:
292:
289:
279:
278:
275:
274:
258:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
229:
224:
220:
216:
212:
207:
203:
202:
201:
196:
192:
188:
184:
179:
174:
169:
168:
167:
164:
163:
154:
153:
152:
151:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2451:
2440:
2397:TonyTheTiger
2368:TonyTheTiger
2364:
2347:
2336:Ding dong...
2334:
2319:
2286:
2283:
2249:
2233:
2232:
2221:Preity Zinta
2218:
2196:
2194:
2177:
2147:TonyTheTiger
2140:double image
2130:
2115:
2089:
2072:
2067:
2061:
2046:
2039:
2037:
2029:
2028:Synopses in
2012:
2008:
2000:
1998:
1957:
1882:
1872:
1867:
1855:
1847:
1828:
1792:
1778:
1762:
1756:
1738:
1733:
1730:? Thanks! --
1725:
1700:
1671:
1641:
1626:
1605:the_undertow
1604:
1588:the_undertow
1587:
1570:the_undertow
1569:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1541:
1525:
1524:
1485:
1462:
1395:
1377:
1352:
1332:
1310:
1291:
1287:
1239:
1220:
1216:
1175:
1073:
1055:
1045:
1040:
1028:
1020:
1001:
962:
944:
928:
920:
917:
905:
901:
897:
894:
890:
879:Adam Cuerden
877:
874:
870:
837:TonyTheTiger
834:
819:
800:
778:
755:
696:
681:
659:
617:
594:
557:
543:
514:
483:
473:
449:
447:
432:
429:
426:
423:
413:
404:
396:
393:
367:
359:
338:
318:
299:
285:
269:
266:
241:
206:TonyTheTiger
178:TonyTheTiger
158:
128:TonyTheTiger
109:
78:
43:
37:
2316:Larry Craig
2282:Knowledge.
2119:Aboutmovies
2086:Sorry again
2068:which parts
1357:; in fact,
867:Peer review
36:This is an
2034:and beyond
1874:22 October
1554:Guinea Pig
1047:15 October
775:Protection
118:] getting
98:Archive 15
90:Archive 11
85:Archive 10
2361:quickfail
2323:FCYTravis
2180:Acalamari
2174:Thank you
1765:Shankbone
1734:Mr.crabby
1648:Noles1984
1534:this link
1380:talk page
931:Lou Crazy
887:Go stones
816:This user
715:Regards,
476:did that
342:₪ ask123
326:₪ ask123
79:Archive 9
73:Archive 8
68:Archive 7
60:Archive 5
2366:queue.--
2338:. NEXT!
2207:Dr. Cash
2203:Comments
2015:spamlist
2013:Signpost
2001:Signpost
1982:Shortcut
1972:Tip Line
1968:Newsroom
1964:Archives
1829:Signpost
1662:This one
1656:Clifford
1630:Garrondo
1526:VanTucky
1392:Rudeness
1335:anal sex
1246:JayHenry
1223:spamlist
1221:Signpost
1200:Shortcut
1190:Tip Line
1186:Newsroom
1182:Archives
1002:Signpost
434:Tovojolo
430:Thanks,
398:Tovojolo
238:Boerboel
2441:Thanks!
1986:WP:POST
1546:Flyer22
1444:Shemale
1384:Jacklee
1339:Flyer22
1275:getting
1254:Thanks!
1204:WP:POST
986:Georgia
968:Georgia
951:Mista-X
789:Sadhaka
761:Georgia
742:Georgia
719:Georgia
407:Fabiopl
173:WP:LEAD
39:archive
2447:my RfA
2246:My Rfa
2112:McNary
2063:Hamlet
2041:Hamlet
2031:Hamlet
2019:Ralbot
2005:Ral315
1775:Thanks
1753:Talese
1742:(Talk)
1363:Angelo
1227:Ralbot
785:Davin7
735:Beagle
670:ask123
527:eybaná
496:eybaná
462:eybaná
363:Davin7
2295:linca
2290:linca
1795:Tucky
1760:David
1487:(UTC)
1292:swell
1268:pull!
984:Sandy
966:Sandy
781:Asana
759:Sandy
740:Sandy
717:Sandy
597:Tucky
560:Tucky
272:Tucky
254:Samir
244:Samir
161:Tucky
16:<
2195:The
2103:Wrad
2093:Wrad
2073:that
1959:Home
1877:2007
1815:Wrad
1806:Wrad
1782:Wrad
1695:this
1666:GCHQ
1508:A.Z.
1427:A.Z.
1414:A.Z.
1410:This
1401:A.Z.
1397:This
1288:sunk
1177:Home
1050:2007
991:Talk
973:Talk
946:This
766:Talk
747:Talk
724:Talk
507:this
2410:bio
2381:bio
2348:Qst
2253:SJP
2160:bio
2047:did
1974:|
1970:|
1966:|
1962:|
1793:Van
1313:Lar
1282:to
1192:|
1188:|
1184:|
1180:|
850:bio
824:to
712:.
639:Lar
620:Lar
595:Van
558:Van
347:{t}
331:{t}
270:Van
219:bio
191:bio
159:Van
141:bio
2416:)
2387:)
2166:)
2143:}}
2137:{{
1984::
1758:--
1705:is
1676:is
1315::
1202::
993:)
975:)
949:--
929:--
856:)
835:--
768:)
749:)
726:)
706:}}
700:{{
641::
622::
517:Ag
486:Ag
482:--
452:Ag
369:--
225:)
197:)
147:)
94:→
64:←
2412:/
2408:/
2406:c
2404:/
2402:t
2400:(
2383:/
2379:/
2377:c
2375:/
2373:t
2371:(
2162:/
2158:/
2156:c
2154:/
2152:t
2150:(
1709:n
1707:o
1703:l
1701:A
1680:n
1678:o
1674:l
1672:A
1446::
1321:c
1319:/
1317:t
989:(
971:(
922:(
852:/
848:/
846:c
844:/
842:t
840:(
828:.
764:(
745:(
722:(
647:c
645:/
643:t
628:c
626:/
624:t
522:ü
491:ü
474:I
457:ü
361:(
221:/
217:/
215:c
213:/
211:t
209:(
193:/
189:/
187:c
185:/
183:t
181:(
143:/
139:/
137:c
135:/
133:t
131:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.