Knowledge

User talk:Peaceworld111/Archive 2

Source šŸ“

152:
ever you want as long as you make it clear to the readers that it is an ahmadiyya mosque or thing relating to it , not in such an ambiguous way as you did in the greater London article, as if you want to lead some readers intentionally towards the idea of ahmadiyya as being the authentic Islam . yes they proclaim islam but they are not approved by muslems in general, even if they are right in there claim ( which they are not ) they represent less than %0.005 among the muslem world. Hence by doing so your the one targeting muslems depriving them from their right to name themselves and name who ever share there believes as muslems and their places of worship as mosques . the realm of islam began more than 1400 years ago compared to 120 years the age of ahmadiyya . if this is a your way to invite people towards ahmadiyya then your deceiving them by taking advantage of the fastest growing religion in the world especially in the west, and it proves that you donā€™t have enough trust in your believes .
1327: 31: 1234: 218:. If any reader is interested about who the mosque belongs to all they have to do is click on the link and read the article. Simple as that. However should it be stated as the image caption... in my view there in no need whatsoever. It is not possible to include every little detail about the mosque as a caption... what about it's location in london? what about when it was constructed? etc. Minor details should remain in 91: 155:
You also take advantage of wikipedia. Yes wikipedia is neutral and doesnā€™t take sides, but that doesnā€™t mean it is unjust , wikipedea is about delivering knowledge to people around the world by providing them with accurate information .which you did not , and i hope your tricks will not pass on users
913:
Hey Peaceworld111, I know you're probably upset with the recent deletion of the List of Friday Sermons article. I just wanted to say that you're clearly a skilled editor, and even if this article wasn't up to standard your contributions are still appreciated. Please don't take any deletion votes as
444:
With list of mosques its not that an unfair coverage is given, its more like we need more representation from other communities. If one community is under represented, that does not mean that a mosque image that happens to belong to another smaller community should be penalised and removed. Anyway
151:
no i am not targeting ahmadiyya i am targeting the method of presenting misleading information to readers by sticking citations when ever you can about ahmadiyya and its places of worship showing them as muslems not as ahmadiyya in a lot of articles , I donā€™t care if you write about ahmadiyya what
803:
I for example am a member of 3 content oriented projects and have a list on my home page of 125 articles I created, plus major edits and other contributions. I listed both the projects and a link to the article creation section of my homepage. That's more than enough; either by itself would be
467:
Hello You edited my post about the largest mosques.Do you know that Al Azhar in Cairo and Mosque of Rome are much bigger than bait ul futuh in London.You may like to review what I stated but I request you to make amendments accordingly as there are 100s of mosques larger than this.
676:
Please can you explain why you would consider removing my factual update on the Mirza page. My family are direct decendents of the Mogul empire and I can trace our lineage back to Jhangir and Lahore in Punjab. I am both proud to be a Mirza and Pakistani British businessman.
1051:
relations between various nations/empires that happened to follow a certain faith. Now such articles also contain relationship between the teachings of the two faiths concerned. Here we have two very different topics which I think can be seperated into two articles titled
376:
I removed it because the point of talk pages is to help us to discuss ways to improve wikipedia articles, i.e. not about people's personal lives...but thanks for your suggestion - maybe you could apply this to yourself so not to waste your own time vandalizing pages
799:
If you are a member of content-oriented Wikiprojects, or can otherwise demonstrate creation and maintenance of article content, those qualify you as well. GA/FA participation isn't required, they're one of the options for the last criteria but not the only one.
1185:
in February, but you did not follow it through. Please advise if you are going to go through with the merge, or should the tags be removed. I understand that you are on a wikibreak so I am not expecting an answer soon. Have a nice break.
829:
I doubt your even a taoist.. what I wrote comes strait from lao tzu the founder of taoism.. And your data is inaccurate and incredibly hazy.. Lao Tzu didn't write the tao te ching, which was written thousands of years after his time...
556:#9. I've also removed the invalid rationale for template space, and tagged the image as missing a rationale and orphaned, as it is not used on Knowledge. This makes the image subject to deletion. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, -- 1030:, most page moves are not discussed before taking place, but that does not mean that moves cannot be reverted or discussed thereafter. Do you disagree with any of the page moves I initiated? If so, which ones and why? 914:
personal attacks on you or your work. There's still so much you can do and help out on, and article creation isn't the most important thing compared to helping out with editing and adding content. Thanks so much,
524:, there may be many mosques larger than Baitul Futuh or any other mosque. It is an incomplete list. If you could find a good reference about its approximate size of Al Azhar mosque, then why not add it yourself? 764: 766: 774: 726:
And once again on this page. Please refrain from removing information without first contacting the contributor. I find your actions extraordinary, especially when carried out anonymously.....
786: 245:. Here on wikipedia I am not trying hide anything or disguise any information. Ahmadis are considered to be non-Muslims by many Muslims and that is clearly written in the intro of the 549: 434:
With you're first question I guess that's the reason why I haven't reverted the last revert from an anonymous user - though I think here its more about the image than representation.
180:
Hi. I will only discuss the issues from a wikipedian perspective and so will ignore all outside issues. This is not for me to discuss here as a wikipedian nor should you be doing so.
610:
Why do you ask? I am no gateway to editing Knowledge. Except in a few cases, you and me like everyone else have the same right to editing Knowledge. I would encourage you to read
271:
Firstly, look at the london central mosque image. The image angle is utterly wrong. Half of the image is of grass and not the mosque, wheras baitul futuh's angle is near-perfect.
1093:
I like the idea of having two separate articles, one discussing relations between the two and one discussing how the two have been compared. How would you feel about making the
542: 509:. All I see is that you editing Baitul Futuh as the second or third largest after mosque of rome and paris - which is a disputed issue and has thus been accommodated for in the 1317: 372:
I hope i didnt touch a nerve by saying that, i really just want you to know that you are missing a lot in life when you confine your self to a small room for the whole day.
618:
as a starting guide to editing Knowledge...and on a final note provide references (preferably secondary sources) whenever you edit (facebook not accepted). Hope that helps.
1222: 1008: 731: 688: 958: 902: 192: 662: 861: 627: 758: 715: 984: 533: 580: 334: 286: 137: 479: 454: 1216: 647: 692: 318: 145: 1162: 1142: 1122: 1075: 936: 887: 191:. However, your edits do not support your statement. How else could you define these edits other than pure targeting of Ahmadiyya related material: 1178: 171: 1012: 565: 702:. But my actual motivation for removal was because it appears personal advertisement to me which is doesn't follow Knowledge guidelines per 819: 274:
Secondly, there is something distinctive about baitul futuh, it is the largest in western EU and in my opinion deserves to be there more.
1060:, the latter one discussing the relationship between two faith's teachings and the former the historical/political relations. Thoughts? 735: 233:. What's the religion of the Ahmadis? Islam, isn't it? not Ahmadiyya or qadiani as you've vandalised the page. It is you who is being 668: 143: 491: 1297: 1041: 873: 633: 386: 118: 426: 845: 615: 604: 541: 410: 277:
thirdly, if you click on the main article there is already a pic of london central mosque there. Best to have different pics.
893:
Hi, its listed as an Abrahamic religion and a monotheistic religion so doesn't make any sense listing it as an islamic sect.
1276: 837: 1004: 990: 947:
concealing the facts is a part of wikipedia policy as well? - you removed some words from "Dove World Outreach Center".
727: 684: 638:
Salam. Is there a reason first university Mirza Masroor Ahmad attended was removed from the Alma mater? I'm just curios.
413:
which also have ahmadiyya bias. I think you give ahmadiyyas an unfair disproportionate coverage which does not look like
954: 962: 1372: 1367: 1355: 1195: 487: 196: 76: 71: 59: 773:
When you have a chance, weigh-in on the discussion taking place on whether these pages should be deleted or not at
349:
Ahmadis consider themselves Muslims so Knowledge will also refer to Ahmadis as Muslims and their religion as Islam.
163: 1301: 1241: 1227: 921: 883: 867: 309:
if needed. Remember, nobody is right in an edit war, you are both automatically wrong for having engaged in one.
200: 103: 1313: 815: 95: 592: 402: 241:. But you don't follow your own statements and mislead people into reading that the religion of Ahmadis is 398: 1289: 1245: 1223: 698:
There is no article, nor any reference in support of your edit, hence I did not find any notability per
1334: 1293: 879: 782: 721: 643: 264:, so that it is easily accepted by editors. However there are several reasons for keeping Baitul Futuh. 230: 204: 38: 1309: 1147:
Look's like this has already been dealt with. I don't think there will be any need to discus further.
1018: 932: 898: 857: 811: 754: 711: 658: 623: 576: 529: 450: 406: 382: 354: 330: 282: 133: 1182: 841: 600: 365:
SecondĀ ; dont you have any thing else to do other than staying on the internet for the whole day ,
1343: 1209: 1155: 1135: 1068: 977: 239:
about delivering knowledge to people around the world by providing them with accurate information
47: 17: 807:
My advice is, assuming you meet either one of those criteria, document it and move yourself up.
1253:
The chap is notable, but a list of books by him isn't. The text can be folded into his article.
791: 611: 397:
I noticed some of your edits indicate a POV in favor of ahmadiyyas. Its obvious edits such as
345:
FirstĀ : do not refer to any thing that is related to Ahmadiyya as islamic because it is not .
305:
the both of you. Please do continue discussion and please do not continue to edit war. Pursue
778: 680:
I think your interception and associated comments wholly inappropriate and indeed offensive.
639: 521: 483: 462: 392: 261: 84: 746: 703: 1000: 950: 833: 561: 475: 314: 167: 159: 125: 114: 1047:
As far as I understand, the reason why you moved the articles was probably because of the
229:
In addition to the unambiguity to my reverts, you are the one who makes it unclear... see
8: 1305: 596: 422: 256:
article? From your previous edits, it is evident that your effort has been to remove the
1204: 1191: 1150: 1130: 1063: 972: 928: 894: 853: 750: 707: 654: 619: 572: 525: 446: 378: 350: 340: 326: 278: 129: 1272: 1027: 298: 1259: 1118: 1037: 918: 591:
can i give summary of this prophecy on hazrat Messiah Maood (as) prophecy section
301:
across multiple articles. As it stands right now I would be perfectly justified in
1258:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
824: 586: 557: 405:
where you order an ahmadiyya paragraph above sunni and sufi. or articles such as
310: 302: 110: 1342:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
553: 514: 438: 418: 414: 253: 1282:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
1187: 1172: 505:, you editing something concerning Al Azhar mosque nor about your edit about 775:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Friday Sermons (Mirza Masroor Ahmad)
593:
http://zh-cn.connect.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=29574945973&topic=17282
510: 502: 306: 257: 1114: 1033: 915: 908: 852:
You got that right...but that's irrelevant. Please follow the guidelines.
742: 699: 942: 552:
because we do not permit the use of non-free images on templates, per
207:. It is obvious you are targeting Ahmadiyya and it is untrue that you 106:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
246: 99: 437:
Second - I ordered the sections alphabetically - if you think that
108:
I can see no justification for removing the categories you removed.
445:
this is list of mosques, its not about one community or another.
401:
where you replace a sunni picture with an ahmadiyya picture. Or
653:
Nope, I didn't remove any, there wasn't one in the first place.
325:
you're mistaken the discussion above is with a different user.
249:
article, and that's the only place where it should be stated.
297:
Hi guys. Looks like you the two of you are engaged in an
189:
targeting the method of presenting misleading information
995: 368:
go and get a life cause i really feel sorry for you .''
1300:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
222:
article. Hope that makes sense to you. Hence it is not
1265:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1026:
Thank you for contacting me about the page moves. Per
361:
why did you remove my second advice to you which was;
216:
clear to the readers that it is an ahmadiyya mosque
260:mosque. Your second attempt is to replace it with 183:First of all you start by stating that you are 969:Hi!your edit did not seem encyclopedic at all. 520:Secondly of course if you are refering to the 237:. You are correct in saying that wikipedia is 767:List of Friday Sermons (Mirza Masroor Ahmad) 94:Please do not add commentary or your own 571:didn't realize policy #9. Thanks anyway. 1271:notice, but please explain why in your 1097:titles disambiguation pages linking to 441:rules here over order its fine with me. 14: 1340:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1127:I'll reply when I come back. SorryĀ :) 996:http://en.wikipedia.org/Anti_Ahmadiyya 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1028:Knowledge's guidelines about boldness 411:List of mosques in the United Kingdom 98:to Knowledge articles, as you did to 1321: 214:next you mention that I should make 209:donā€™t care if write about ahmadiyya 25: 23: 1260:deleted for any of several reasons 1248:because of the following concern: 1232: 24: 1386: 1325: 1201:Responded on articles talk page. 669:Removal of my edit on Mirza page 550:Template:Portal/Images/Ahmadiyya 102:. Doing so violates Knowledge's 89: 29: 1242:Mirza Ghulam Ahmad bibliography 1228:Mirza Ghulam Ahmad bibliography 634:Mirza Masroor Ahmad/University 13: 1: 543:File:Amc logo white minar.jpg 287:18:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC) 172:17:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC) 138:16:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 119:21:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 628:22:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 605:10:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 581:01:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 566:20:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 534:02:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 492:01:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 455:09:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC) 427:08:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC) 104:neutral point of view policy 7: 1304:allows discussion to reach 1285:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1268:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 991:New Article: Anti Ahmadiyya 872:Why did you remove it here: 387:17:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 357:) 23:45, 5 January 2011 (UT 335:22:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 319:22:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 10: 1391: 1143:15:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC) 1123:12:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 1076:20:48, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1042:16:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 937:20:26, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 927:Thankyou for that message. 922:17:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 903:09:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC) 888:22:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 862:19:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 846:19:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 820:23:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 787:15:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 759:02:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 736:21:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 716:02:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 693:21:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 548:I removed this image from 501:Hi, I don't see in any of 1290:proposed deletion process 1103:Comparison of Islam and X 1013:20:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 985:21:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 963:06:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 663:01:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 648:01:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 407:List of mosques in Canada 1318:15:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 1217:17:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 1196:14:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1183:Khatm-e-Nubuwwat Academy 1177:You proposed a merge of 1163:17:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 683:Yours Ammar Yusuf Mirza 1277:the article's talk page 868:Category: Islamic sects 185:not targeting ahmadiyya 18:User talk:Peaceworld111 1237: 741:Same applies here per 124:further discussion at 1338:of past discussions. 1302:articles for deletion 1246:proposed for deletion 1236: 1099:Islamic - X relations 1054:Islamic - X relations 880:Supreme Deliciousness 747:WP:COI#Self-promotion 706:#5. Hope that helps. 704:WP:COI#Self-promotion 522:List of large mosques 262:London Central Mosque 42:of past discussions. 1310:William M. Connolley 812:Georgewilliamherbert 471:Thanks in advance. 1294:deletion processes 1238: 722:Notable Pakistanis 503:your contributions 307:dispute resolution 1378: 1377: 1350: 1349: 1344:current talk page 1224:Proposed deletion 1019:Islamic relations 1003:comment added by 953:comment added by 836:comment added by 612:this introduction 495: 478:comment added by 162:comment added by 96:personal analysis 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1382: 1364: 1352: 1351: 1329: 1328: 1322: 1287: 1286: 1270: 1269: 1235: 1212: 1207: 1158: 1153: 1138: 1133: 1071: 1066: 1015: 980: 975: 965: 848: 779:Khurramchaudhary 640:Khurramchaudhary 616:policies section 494: 472: 226:(as you stated). 174: 144:discussion with 93: 92: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1360: 1326: 1298:speedy deletion 1284: 1283: 1267: 1266: 1233: 1231: 1210: 1205: 1175: 1156: 1151: 1136: 1131: 1069: 1064: 1023:Hi Peaceworld, 1021: 998: 993: 978: 973: 948: 945: 911: 878:Answer here. -- 870: 831: 827: 794: 771: 724: 671: 636: 589: 546: 507:largest mosques 473: 465: 395: 343: 252:What about the 157: 149: 146:User:65.49.26.2 90: 87: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1388: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1358: 1348: 1347: 1330: 1308:for deletion. 1288:will stop the 1256: 1255: 1230: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1179:Akber Choudhry 1174: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1145: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084:Hi Peaceworld, 1079: 1078: 1020: 1017: 992: 989: 988: 987: 944: 941: 940: 939: 910: 907: 906: 905: 869: 866: 865: 864: 838:97.126.218.240 826: 823: 793: 792:CREDO accounts 790: 770: 765:Nomination of 763: 762: 761: 723: 720: 719: 718: 670: 667: 666: 665: 635: 632: 631: 630: 597:Khalidnawaz123 588: 585: 584: 583: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 518: 515:Mosque of Rome 464: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 442: 435: 394: 391: 390: 389: 359: 358: 342: 339: 338: 337: 322: 321: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 275: 272: 266: 265: 254:Greater London 250: 227: 212: 181: 156:of Knowledge 148: 142: 141: 140: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1387: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1331: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1280: 1278: 1274: 1263: 1261: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1247: 1243: 1229: 1225: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1208: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1154: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1134: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1029: 1024: 1016: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005:78.149.23.147 1002: 997: 986: 983: 982: 981: 976: 968: 967: 966: 964: 960: 956: 952: 938: 934: 930: 929:Peaceworld111 926: 925: 924: 923: 920: 917: 904: 900: 896: 895:Peaceworld111 892: 891: 890: 889: 885: 881: 876: 874: 863: 859: 855: 854:Peaceworld111 851: 850: 849: 847: 843: 839: 835: 822: 821: 817: 813: 808: 805: 801: 797: 789: 788: 784: 780: 776: 768: 760: 756: 752: 751:Peaceworld111 748: 744: 740: 739: 738: 737: 733: 729: 728:80.46.131.251 717: 713: 709: 708:Peaceworld111 705: 701: 697: 696: 695: 694: 690: 686: 685:80.46.131.251 681: 678: 674: 664: 660: 656: 655:Peaceworld111 652: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 629: 625: 621: 620:Peaceworld111 617: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 598: 594: 582: 578: 574: 573:Peaceworld111 570: 569: 568: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 544: 535: 531: 527: 526:Peaceworld111 523: 519: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 469: 463:large mosques 456: 452: 448: 447:Peaceworld111 443: 440: 436: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 393:Ahmadiyya POV 388: 384: 380: 379:Peaceworld111 375: 374: 373: 370: 369: 366: 362: 356: 352: 351:Peaceworld111 348: 347: 346: 336: 332: 328: 327:Peaceworld111 324: 323: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295: 288: 284: 280: 279:Peaceworld111 276: 273: 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 173: 169: 165: 161: 153: 147: 139: 135: 131: 130:Peaceworld111 127: 123: 122: 121: 120: 116: 112: 109: 105: 101: 97: 85:December 2010 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1361: 1339: 1333: 1292:, but other 1281: 1273:edit summary 1264: 1257: 1252: 1240:The article 1239: 1203: 1202: 1176: 1149: 1148: 1129: 1128: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1048: 1032: 1025: 1022: 994: 971: 970: 955:202.59.89.56 946: 919:(let's chat) 912: 877: 871: 828: 810:Good luck! 809: 806: 802: 798: 795: 772: 769:for deletion 725: 682: 679: 675: 672: 637: 590: 547: 511:Baitul Futuh 506: 474:ā€” Preceding 470: 466: 396: 371: 367: 364: 363: 360: 344: 258:Baitul Futuh 242: 238: 234: 223: 219: 215: 208: 188: 184: 154: 150: 107: 88: 65: 43: 37: 1332:This is an 1296:exist. The 1095:Islam and X 1058:Islam and X 999:ā€”Preceding 949:ā€”Preceding 832:ā€”Preceding 480:Iamahumanok 377:repeatedly. 158:ā€”Preceding 36:This is an 1049:historical 673:Dear sir, 558:Hammersoft 341:5 Jan 2011 311:Beeblebrox 164:65.49.26.2 111:Dougweller 1373:ArchiveĀ 4 1368:ArchiveĀ 3 1362:ArchiveĀ 2 1356:ArchiveĀ 1 1306:consensus 1244:has been 419:Someone65 247:Ahmadiyya 224:ambiguous 100:Ahmadiyya 77:ArchiveĀ 4 72:ArchiveĀ 3 66:ArchiveĀ 2 60:ArchiveĀ 1 1188:Muhandes 1001:unsigned 951:unsigned 834:unsigned 804:enough. 614:and the 517:article. 513:and the 488:contribs 476:unsigned 303:blocking 299:edit war 243:qadianis 187:you are 160:unsigned 1335:archive 1206:--Peace 1152:--Peace 1132:--Peace 1065:--Peace 974:--Peace 825:Dude... 587:salam , 554:WP:NFCC 439:WP:NPOV 415:WP:NPOV 220:its own 39:archive 1275:or on 1115:Neelix 1034:Neelix 916:Yaksar 796:FYI - 235:unjust 1211:world 1181:into 1173:Merge 1157:world 1137:world 1070:world 979:world 16:< 1314:talk 1192:talk 1119:talk 1101:and 1056:and 1038:talk 1009:talk 959:talk 933:talk 899:talk 884:talk 858:talk 842:talk 816:talk 783:talk 755:talk 749:#5. 745:and 743:WP:N 732:talk 712:talk 700:WP:N 689:talk 659:talk 644:talk 624:talk 601:talk 577:talk 562:talk 530:talk 484:talk 451:talk 423:talk 409:and 403:here 399:this 383:talk 355:talk 331:talk 315:talk 283:talk 168:talk 134:talk 126:talk 115:talk 1226:of 909:Hey 595:?? 417:. 1316:) 1279:. 1262:. 1194:) 1186:-- 1121:) 1040:) 1011:) 961:) 943:Hi 935:) 901:) 886:) 875:? 860:) 844:) 818:) 785:) 777:. 757:) 734:) 714:) 691:) 661:) 646:) 626:) 603:) 579:) 564:) 532:) 490:) 486:ā€¢ 453:) 425:) 385:) 333:) 317:) 285:) 203:, 199:, 195:, 170:) 136:) 128:. 117:) 1346:. 1312:( 1190:( 1117:( 1105:? 1036:( 1007:( 957:( 931:( 897:( 882:( 856:( 840:( 814:( 781:( 753:( 730:( 710:( 687:( 657:( 642:( 622:( 599:( 575:( 560:( 528:( 482:( 449:( 421:( 381:( 353:( 329:( 313:( 281:( 231:4 211:. 205:4 201:3 197:2 193:1 166:( 132:( 113:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Peaceworld111
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 1
ArchiveĀ 2
ArchiveĀ 3
ArchiveĀ 4
personal analysis
Ahmadiyya
neutral point of view policy
Dougweller
talk
21:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
talk
Peaceworld111
talk
16:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
User:65.49.26.2
unsigned
65.49.26.2
talk
17:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
1
2
3
4
4
Ahmadiyya
Greater London
Baitul Futuh

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘