Knowledge

User talk:Osarius/Archive 7

Source 📝

367: 632: 576: 65: 47: 465:, the project is divided into two chunks: the "list view" (essentially an updated version of Special:NewPages) and the "article view", a view you'll be presented with when you open up individual articles that contains a toolbar with lots of options to interact with the page - patrolling it, adding maintenance tags, nominating it for deletion, so on. 548:! Note that as a prototype it will inevitably have bugs - if you find one not already mentioned at the talkpage, bring it up and I'm happy to carry it through to the devs. The same is true of any additions you can think of to the software, or any questions you might have - let me know and I'll respond. 148:
I certainly hope it wasn't my question that made you throw in the towel: I was legitimately questioning your nomination, as it did not appear to me that the user was purely vandalizing. I thought maybe you had dealt with this user as a sock before, so I wanted to hear your reasoning. It was meant to
228:
My reasoning for the AIV report: The user has a last warning template on their usertalk. I don't know if the user had deleted previous warnings without going through their talkpage history (something I'm not gonna do for every trouble user I come across). My warning was placed after the final
193:
So there's my reasoning. Right or wrong, the article was deleted under those criteria. Even if 2 were incorrect, G10 was, and the deleting admin didn't have to delete it under G2 or G3. I am not shifting blame, just pointing this out. But as I say, I'm ready for a break anyway apart from the
472:
on Wednesday, but ran into bugs and had to reschedule - the same happened on Thursday :(. We've queued a new deployment for Monday PST, and hopefully that one will go better. If it does, the software will be ready to play around with and test by the following week! :).
480:. A stripped-down version of this should be ready to deploy fairly soon after the list view is; I'm afraid I don't have precise dates yet. When I have more info, or can unleash everyone to test the list view, I'll let you know :). As always, any questions to the 208:
I was definitely not questioning the CSD tag, those were clearly justified. It was more the instant vandalism report; seemed to me the user hadn't demonstrated malice enough to be blocked. Anyways, best of luck, hope to see you back minus any troubles.
507:
Hey Osarius! We've finally finished the NPT prototype and deployed it on enwiki. We'll be holding an office hours session on the 16th at 21:00 in #wikimedia-office to show it off, get feedback and plot future developments - hope to see you there!
656:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
600:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
660:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
604:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
373: 621: 653: 102: 325: 321: 665: 110: 531:
is now live on enwiki! We had to briefly take it down after an unfortunate bug started showing up, but it's now live and we will continue developing it on-site.
307: 109:, but for the foreseeable future, that's it. Got any questions? Email me. Got nothing nice to say? I don't want to hear your crap. Simple as. Got a problem? 476:
On the article view front, the developers are doing some fantastic work designing the toolbar, which we're calling the "curation bar"; you can see a mockup
355: 366: 616: 565: 238: 223: 203: 517: 582: 567: 436: 273: 560: 597: 469: 380: 101:
or vandalising tactic, I've been fighting it for so long I know not to stoop so low. I'll still be around in the background working on the
229:
warning, so I report to AIV as in my mind and in the evidence I can see on my screen, it was after a final. Thanks for your wellwishing.
502: 643: 587: 335: 477: 444: 522: 497: 328:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 331: 269: 184:
Again, probably not the most kosher of taggings, but G2 because it was a new article by a new user who probably hasn't read
248: 32:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
688:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
163: 106: 300: 461:
Hey Osarius/Archive 7 :). A quick update on how things are going with the New Page Triage/New Pages Feed project. As
138: 125: 393: 422: 614: 638: 623: 545: 481: 313: 647: 591: 265: 86: 456: 290: 468:
On the list view front, we're pretty much done! We tried deploying it to enwiki, in line with our
89:. I read the policies we have on here, take action with them in mind on pages that obviously are 556: 513: 493: 485: 432: 390: 536: 296: 261: 257: 211: 151: 8: 677: 405: 286: 113:. I may be back. I doubt my disappearance for a while is really that great a loss anyway. 75: 37: 413:
Thanks! It's been fun and I've learnt a lot through it. I should be back properly soon.
609: 181:
The page was an attack page, towards the people listed at the bottom of it, hence G10.
552: 509: 489: 428: 419: 351: 342:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
235: 200: 143: 135: 122: 17: 178:. It had no real purpose. Therefore perhaps not the most kosher of taggings, but G3. 398: 360: 280: 149:
come off as an inquiry and gentle admonishment for quick warning, nothing more. -
78:. Anyone who wants me (but I highly doubt it), or would like to take the time to 662: 387: 188:, or the new article guidelines set out on the wizard, because again it was CB. 82: 606: 528: 462: 450: 185: 98: 414: 347: 343: 230: 195: 175: 130: 117: 90: 79: 169:
My reasoning for tagging that page with the criteria I did was as follows:
94: 64: 46: 317: 53: 670: 57: 654:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/American Airlines Flight 1340
383:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
52:
This page contains words and phrases that may be considered
636:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
580:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
316:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 527:
Hey all :). A notification that the prototype for the
642:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
586:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
379:Message added 10:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC). You can 80:teach me on how not to screw things up around here 374:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/AmandaParker 598:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rhia charles 308:Disambiguation link notification for April 24 285:Enjoying the welcome sound you got there ;) 445:TUSC token 66daf54c31bb03940b0098079dcf39ca 372:Hello, Osarius. You have new messages at 194:background hand-coding with the WMF team. 14: 41: 28:The following discussion is closed. 644:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 588:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 23: 503:New Page Triage prototype released 365: 253:TParis no see, just edit I make? 24: 698: 652:The article will be discussed at 596:The article will be discussed at 83:without taking the effin' biscuit 684:The discussion above is closed. 630: 574: 63: 45: 97:for it. I'm not gonna play the 523:New Page Triage/New Pages Feed 13: 1: 639:American Airlines Flight 1340 624:American Airlines Flight 1340 312:Hi. When you recently edited 111:I really couldn't give a fuck 249:Giving reply I did to TParis 7: 10: 703: 449:I am now proud owner of a 437:12:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 423:11:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 394:10:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 356:10:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC) 314:Darwin Forest Country Park 301:19:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 274:14:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 239:01:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 224:00:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 204:00:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 164:00:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 139:12:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 126:00:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 666:17:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 617:20:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 534:The page can be found at 686:Please do not modify it. 646:or whether it should be 590:or whether it should be 561:13:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 518:03:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 482:talkpage for the project 30:Please do not modify it. 498:23:26, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 546:tell us what you think 427:Sweet! Can't wait :). 370: 463:the enwiki page notes 369: 537:Special:NewPagesFeed 344:opt-out instructions 470:Engagement Strategy 326:fix with Dab solver 540:. Please, please, 381:remove this notice 371: 334:• Join us at the 85:, can reach me by 31: 404:Thanks! Moved to 339: 277: 260:comment added by 176:complete bollocks 91:complete bollocks 71: 70: 29: 18:User talk:Osarius 694: 634: 633: 578: 577: 457:New Pages update 417: 384: 329: 322:check to confirm 304: 276: 254: 233: 220: 217: 214: 198: 160: 157: 154: 133: 120: 67: 49: 42: 702: 701: 697: 696: 695: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 673: 635: 631: 628: 612: 579: 575: 572: 525: 505: 459: 447: 415: 401: 385: 378: 363: 336:DPL WikiProject 310: 294: 283: 262:Fuzzy butternut 255: 251: 231: 218: 215: 212: 196: 158: 155: 152: 146: 131: 118: 40: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 700: 683: 672: 669: 629: 627: 622:Nomination of 620: 610: 573: 571: 566:Nomination of 564: 529:New Pages Feed 524: 521: 504: 501: 458: 455: 446: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 400: 397: 377: 364: 362: 359: 309: 306: 299:comment added 287:Littledanno159 282: 279: 250: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 190: 189: 182: 179: 171: 170: 145: 142: 69: 68: 61: 50: 39: 36: 35: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 699: 687: 682: 681: 679: 671:Barnstar time 668: 667: 664: 658: 655: 649: 645: 641: 640: 625: 619: 618: 615: 613: 608: 602: 599: 593: 589: 585: 584: 569: 563: 562: 558: 554: 549: 547: 543: 539: 538: 532: 530: 520: 519: 515: 511: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 474: 471: 466: 464: 454: 452: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 421: 418: 412: 411: 410: 409: 407: 396: 395: 392: 389: 382: 375: 368: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 340: 337: 333: 327: 323: 319: 315: 305: 302: 298: 292: 288: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 240: 237: 234: 227: 226: 225: 222: 221: 207: 206: 205: 202: 199: 192: 191: 187: 183: 180: 177: 174:The page was 173: 172: 168: 167: 166: 165: 162: 161: 141: 140: 137: 134: 128: 127: 124: 121: 115: 114: 112: 108: 105:and possibly 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 81: 77: 66: 62: 59: 55: 51: 48: 44: 43: 33: 19: 685: 680:. Thank you! 675: 674: 659: 651: 637: 626:for deletion 603: 595: 583:Rhia charles 581: 570:for deletion 568:Rhia charles 553:Okeyes (WMF) 550: 544:test it and 541: 535: 533: 526: 510:Okeyes (WMF) 506: 490:Okeyes (WMF) 475: 467: 460: 448: 429:Okeyes (WMF) 403: 402: 386: 341: 311: 284: 256:— Preceding 252: 210: 150: 147: 129: 116: 95:doggy-styled 73: 72: 27: 295:—Preceding 87:emailing me 38:Break Time. 663:...William 488:. Thanks! 346:. Thanks, 676:Moved to 453:account! 416:Osarius 330:Read the 318:Ashbourne 232:Osarius 197:Osarius 144:Wikibreak 132:Osarius 119:Osarius 74:I'm on a 54:offensive 607:Ubelowme 551:Thanks! 399:Barnstar 361:Talkback 281:Welcome! 270:contribs 258:unsigned 93:and get 648:deleted 592:deleted 348:DPL bot 297:undated 213:Running 153:Running 107:WP:RA/I 542:please 219:Brains 186:WP:MOS 159:Brains 99:WP:IAR 58:vulgar 391:Ghost 76:break 16:< 678:here 557:talk 514:talk 494:talk 486:mine 478:here 451:TUSC 433:talk 420:Talk 406:here 388:Sudo 352:talk 291:talk 266:talk 236:Talk 201:Talk 136:Talk 123:Talk 484:or 332:FAQ 293:) 103:FES 56:or 650:. 594:. 559:) 516:) 496:) 435:) 354:) 324:| 272:) 268:• 216:On 156:On 611:U 555:( 512:( 492:( 431:( 408:. 376:. 350:( 338:. 320:( 303:. 289:( 264:( 209:- 60:.

Index

User talk:Osarius

offensive
vulgar

break
teach me on how not to screw things up around here
without taking the effin' biscuit
emailing me
complete bollocks
doggy-styled
WP:IAR
FES
WP:RA/I
I really couldn't give a fuck
Osarius
Talk
00:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Osarius
Talk
12:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
RunningOnBrains
00:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
complete bollocks
WP:MOS
Osarius
Talk
00:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
RunningOnBrains
00:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.