User talk:Nick Moyes/Archive 18

3036:

GA status. I don't desire to do that myself and I'd like some advice on how to proceed with it. All of those are things that are beyond teahouse status for me. I should emphasize that I am actually a very experienced writer and I am used to writing every single day. I don't have any "bottleneck" at that level--it is translating that experience into the very specific style of Knowledge that is difficult. For example, I have come across articles that are so poorly written that I want to just rewrite the entire thing--but I have to at least attempt to retain some of the aspects of the page that have been contributed by other users. This is not my encyclopedia but OUR encyclopedia, and I'm not used to being constrained in that way. Eventually, once I have cleaned out many of the gnome backlogs and I am only doing maintenance, I hope to be able to focus more on directly working on articles, perhaps improving one per day or so. I don't mind waiting on your responses at all--I have at least a month of heavy work (more than that at a slower pace) that I already know how to do, and I'm learning to do new things every day. There are probably 2-3 pages in my list that need attention very soon, but other than those nothing is really time-sensitive. I'd love to have some feedback on a few pieces of work I have already done, as well, but in due time. I would love to have a page to discuss all of this on. I never expected rapid responses--I assumed something more along the lines of you getting back to me when you aren't busy, more of a sort of within two weeks-ish time frame on average. The other question is, are we considering this adoption or something less formal? Thanks!

3001:

consider giving that a try. For example, there are a million red-linked species articles out there just ripe for creation, and I could guide you through that process if you wished to. I don't do a vast amount of repetitive maintenance tasks myself, despite these being immensely valuable. I have, however, found myself drawn towards some of the other administrative and support work here, and will probably put my name forward for consideration of being given admin rights later this year when I've a little more free and able. I can see that with c 2,200 edits, though less than 150 in mainspace, with no single article you've worked on in detail, you could learn a lot by focussing on just one subject and working to improve that over a period of time. I'm probably not the best person to advise you on some of the more gnomish tasks that you've done so far. In fact, you could probably teach me some of them...I've never tried Rater, for example.

3013:

are bit too long to tease out with a Teahouse question. If I can help you get the confidence to work on writing good, well-referenced article content - even if it's only stub or start level - and to understand where you can find some of the key resources for yourself to do that, I think my job is done. So let me know what you think. It might be nice to know your biological interests and current academic level (I'm more plants than animals). It would also be helpful (but not essential) to have some idea of your age so I can appreciate where you are within the education system (pre University/first year/post grad? etc). Gender is nice to know, but neither are things you should reveal publicly here if you're not OK doing that. Not revealing that is fine, too. Anyway, I must shoot. Apologies for any typos in this reply. Let me know what you think.

3028:

users by the end of this year or even earlier. It is sadly very underutilized. Really the main gnomish stuff I want to get into is categories, citations, and cleanup tags. What I would really like is help getting into editing articles. To me, FA/GA status is an unreasonable standard for most of the nearly 6 million articles on enwiki. Some subjects truly cannot be discussed at that length, and even if they are it is questionable whether it's worth that much time. I see B-class as a more achievable standard--I rarely complain when I look something up as a reader and find a B article. I don't expect myself to be pushing articles beyond B-class probably ever, except perhaps a few B-class articles I have found that seem worth a GA review to me. Even those I would want to be out of my hands.

3032:

have worked mainly outside the purview of Wikiproject Tree of Life so far. I enjoy neighboring topics such as geology and organic chemistry. I am male, but one of my top priorities with Rater is to ensure that all female biography articles are properly included in the appropriate wikiproject (usually WPWS but sometimes others are more relevant). I am feeling a little overwhelmed right now with the sciences but eventually I would like to work with Women in Red as well. After I complete my degree I will be seeking certification to teach high school (or maybe middle school) and I would love to use Knowledge as an educational tool in that far-flung future, especially with underrepresented students.

3070:(i.e. clearly committed and keen to improve across a number of areas in the medium to long term), and definitely not for brand new editors. Just as in real life, adoption does involve a commitment on both sides, and I didn't want to spend my time helping some POV-pusher learn to create one pet article about their company or favourite musician, but who then promptly leaves the project, never to be seen again. I see it as offering longer term support and gentle encouragement to improve - and definitely not instant answers - as you see by the tardiness of my reply to you! It has been my lack of time this last year or so which stopped me committing to try to improve and revive the AAU scheme. 3054:, thank you for that background explanation and information about yourself. On the basis of what you've said, and notwithstanding that I've not had much of a chance to look through your contributions thus far, I would be happy to support you as best I can. We clearly have some interests in common, and the idea that you might go into teaching and spread the word about the careful use of Knowledge in schools is a real positive. I don't personally regard Adoption here as a very formal process. (My approach would not be a very structured one) In fact, the Adopt-a-User project became moribund some years ago when 1983:, as an extremely valuable host. Funnily enough, a few weeks back I was doing some preparatory work, prior to suggesting an update to the displayed, and very out-of-date, list of images at the top of the TH page, and I did consider posting a list of the latest article that each of the most active hosts had created - purely to help new editors see what we each get up to. But it's actually a crude method of competence, especially as some very experienced TH hosts haven't created any yet, or at least for many years. So I dropped that thought. Nice work there, 4801: 2602: 3082:

actually know you've written there. We can each inform the other if we no longer wish to cooperate in this way together. And that might be simply because we have covered the basics you need and you or I now feel you're OK to go off on your own; or one or other of us might run out of free time, or we simply end up hating each other!!! Who knows? It's courteous and reasonable then just to agree ending things. Should you wish to copy over all or any content from the pages we work on, you're absolutely free to do that. If you wish, you may add

5117: 2669: 2569: 4774: 3431: 3405: 3359: 2613: 2579: 31: 4753: 3338: 4812: 4764: 3349: 2647: 2555: 2636: 4966: 3453: 2771: 4531:

in this state. It will undoubtedly be turned down at this first time around if it remains in this parlous state. So you've got some work to do before it crosses a reviewer's screen. Try to stand back and look at it from a distance, and in comparison with other equivalent articles, and maybe you will see what it needs to turn this into a well-written encyclopaedia article. Because sports is not my thing, I can't comment on notability, but take a look at

2922:

frustrated with my skills on multiple occasions, especially when I'm working with trickier aspects. Short-term goals would be learning more about formatting, infoboxes, useful templates/tags, and so on, while a good mid-term goal for me would be full proficiency in taking diverse articles (in my field) up to C quality, even from a stub. I'm not interested at this time in contributing to GA/FA-level articles--I feel that would be a waste of my time.

4406: 4334: 3907: 3688: 3624: 1731: 1715: 1692: 860: 1448: 4675: 4383: 3848: 3646: 1687: 1664: 855: 832: 4244: 449: 4909: 2741: 4194: 5031: 3488: 2825: 1293: 2350:, which appears to cater for "the education of children, young people and adults, including those with emotional and behavioural difficulties". I suspect that having set up his page he is helping out a fellow resident. That brings me to the main point, in the infoboxes for both of them are full names and email addresses. This worries me, particularly in light of the description of Novalis. Should they be redacted? Regards, 3420: 3394: 2658: 4823: 2687: 2544: 4745: 3386: 2628: 5155:: even as we build our first structured task, we have been thinking about the next one. "Add an image" is a structured task in which newcomers would be recommended images from Wikimedia Commons to add to unillustrated articles. This is an ambitious idea with many details to consider. We have already learned a lot from community members, and we encourage everyone to 590:

perfectly fine with recieving an answer or two and waiting for the others. I don't want to be overwhelming with all of my questions and I understand that you have a life and even other interests on Knowledge. I've also noticed that your other adoptee has asked for your advice on his draft. I'm fine with waiting my turn if you want to take a look at that first. :)

2476:

generally need access to quiet time and to a keyboard, rather than faff about on a tiny mobile screen at odd moments which I've been doing a lot of lately. (Daughter has been stealing my laptop for doing her exam revision, which doesn't make it easy) Also: thanks for your holding reply to another user re adoption, which I'm about to reply to. Did you know that

1250:

verifiability and reliable sources. Stuff that might once have been OK, probably isn't any more. I hope you can appreciate that's why you might be feeling criticised, when previously your weren't. What you've experienced isn't anything personal - just a reflection of the higher standards we've all set ourselves to work under. Best wishes,

2817:). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication. 3074:

a subpage here on my user page. We'd keep all conversations on adoption-related matters to that sub-page's Talk page, and my current approach with Clovermoss is to order the various shortcut links to policies, guidelines and help-pages on the user subpage so we both have a quick overview of what we've covered.

3035:

So to circle back, I have private lists of articles that I want to improve in various ways, some articles that need to be deleted/moved/merged/etc (which I REALLY need help understanding on a per-article basis), a few articles that I need to create, and a few articles that need further assessment for

2284:

Some of the features, such as navigation footers and links to sister projects are already included on article pages. And some already have interface counterparts (such as image slideshows). Some of the rest may be able to be integrated directly via script, but may need further development before they

2274:

Another approach would be to focus on implementing specific features independently, and provide them somewhere highly visible in a non-portal presentation context (that is, on a page that wasn't a portal that has lots of traffic, i.e., articles). Such as inserted directly into an article's HTML, as a

740:

Please advise how I would add a citation or reference? There are various websites mainly reddit.com that have this text “ They were first spotted by David Oddie, boss of Wakefield based Ambergris Records in a Bradford club, who passed his enthusiasm onto Dead Good Records in Lincoln, famous for their

3978:

Hello, Nick Moyes. I am really interested in this article and was wondering if you could take a look at it. I added reliable references to help it get published, so it should be good. but if you have any pointer,s please leave them on my talk page WaussusBeaver. (Note: please don't give me any broad

3766:

I have this bright idea that recruiting more female editors will no doubt translate to an increase in content about women, hence in 2021, i am focused on recruiting more women into Wiki. Challenge is, there is still a lot i have got to learn, thus i need the help of an experienced editor. So please

3081:

doesn't work on them. Thus, you would need to add that page to your Watchlist, and because I'm away from my PC so much, and don't want to be swamped with email notifications, I have currently inactivated my own Watchlist email notifications. Thus I'd need you to 'ping' me correctly if you want me to

3073:

So, if you're OK with it, I'm very happy to support you in learning to create articles from scratch. Providing you can get to a Start class level with most things you work on, and perhaps the odd C-class, I'd be very pleased. Going any further is just a bonus, not a target. I would propose to create

2303:

New encyclopedia program features will likely eventually render most portals obsolete. For example, the pop-up feature of MediaWiki provides much the same functionality as excerpts in portals already, and there is also a slideshow feature to view all the images on the current page (just click on any

589:

I've asked a lot of questions at the adoption page recently. I'm just writing here because I am aware that it is a lot of questions and that I'm okay with waiting for answers. I've noticed that sometimes you answer all my questions in one big wall of text and if you don't always want to do that, I'm

303:

Yes, I knew that, thanks. Am just investigating their other activities and the odd mendacious statement. I think it's a case of a fairly bright kid who seeks recognition and lots of fancy hats, but doesn't know enough to drive a big car yet. Hope we can sort them out before they have a head on crash

4530:

is a not very well-written lead paragraph which is quite confusing. There's some poor referencing, incomplete external links, sections without any text or citations, and not much additional content to demonstrate notability. I am quite disappointed you felt it was worthy of submitting to AFC review

4145:

Hello Nick, you wrote a wonderful response in the Teahouse to EpicCarnage12, who is a student in the information literacy course I am teaching this semester. Perhaps what he is learning in class and your enthusiasm and suggestions will encourage him to edit beyond the short span of the course. With

3031:

I'm a senior biology student, very eclectic. I have had less education in wildlife bio, plants, or computational biology, but I find those topics very interesting as well and I plan to educate myself. I think that I have a slight preference for "concept" articles over taxon articles, which is why I

2913:

using Rater as noted on my userpage. If you have used Rater, you will know that it is super easy. I consider it valuable work and I learned some really useful skills from it, but they don't transfer as well to the work areas that I want to break into and unfortunately it sort of pads my edit count.

678:

Yes, I saw that and also had concerns - though it sould be noted at this time that the IP and LH aren't necessarily the same person. I note the IP was swiftly blocked and good to see that an SPI will look into it further, though it could be a 'joe job' (a new phrase on me). I wonder what proportion

111:

article which in my opinion is over-referenced tripe. I do not intend to delete any of it (I know NOTHING about Adams), but thought you would be amused by part of Levent's edit explanation "Every single statement is well cited from reliable sources and is also checked by Nick Moyes who gave a green

3012:

for immediate assistance. But I can probably address some of the more complex and general questions you might have on the less gnomish work around her, and guide/steer you through some of them, or you can call me to invite me to look through work you've been preparing. i.e. the kind of things that

2506:

Well, at least your daughter isn't procastinating :). I have a lot on my plate too, but at least my exams are still a few weeks away. I was hoping for more time this weekend for Knowledge, but I still have a lot to do so I won't be around as much as I would like. As for the link, I forgot to check

3614:

Often editors use a "non-breaking space" to make a gap between two items when reading but still show them together. This can be used to avoid a line break. You will now be able to add new ones via the special character tool in the 2010, 2017, and visual editors. The character will be shown in the

3123: 3093:

Perhaps I can get you to kick off when you're ready by copy/pasting bits of the summary above about yourself over to an 'About me' post, and perhaps follow it up with a bullet pointed list of questions or just listing different elements of article creation or other editing matters you feel you're

2990:

thanks for coming over to my page to seek some support and guidance. Ironically, I was just thinking of temporarily removing my current offer for adoption as I'm finding I have very little spare time beyond my own faffing about on Knowledge, let alone rapidly assisting others. That said, if I can

2908:

I feel like I should explain my contribs, as well. I have nearly 2,000 edits on paper, but that is a poor representation of what kind of work I have done and I feel like it overestimates me. My first major project on Knowledge was to completely clear the backlog of over 800 unassessed articles at

2904:

although that's something of a stretch goal. At the moment I have very little interest in administrative tasks and I am generally most interested in learning to be a more effective editor. NPP is also something I would love to work on in the future when I feel like I really have my editing skills

2475:

Thank you. I did see you'd been busy and productive, which is really great. I also recognise I owe you some roplies to earlier questions, which I will get around to doing as soon as I can. You do absolutely the right hing by also posting at the Teahouse for immediate replies when you need them. I

256:

I just looked at his recent edits, and one of them had the edit summary of "Installing User:Nick Moyes/common.js (script-installer)". His edits that were adding things to your pages used the same summary as yours, which makes me wonder if one of your scripts does that. He could have believed that

134:

Ah, that'll be as a result of my god-like status finally being recognised (- if only by one person, thus far) About time, I say! I know nothing about Adams either - see post above for where my "green signal" came from. Likewise, I'm minded not to delete it, either, but it needs care not to overdo

3027:

Thanks for your reply! I don't so much feel that I need help with the gnomish work. I'm actually in the process of writing a guide for Rater right now, which I will be submitting to Evad37 when I'm finished--I'll be sure to ping you when I do. I would not be surprised if I am one of its heaviest

2995:

which I converted from a simple list, but burned myself out so that when it got to my FA submission, I took too long to resolve a couple of matters, and it was put on hold. Two years later I now need to find some mental space to sit down and take that final tiny step to get it reassessed, as I'm

2921:

of work, though--maintaining projects via assessment, management of categories, (tasteful) tagging, and working through cleanup listing. At the same time, I have my own personal backlog of many articles I have come across during my assessment spree that need direct, dedicated work. I have become

3000:

might be better, but I actually think you might find that simply aiming to improve one or two stubs to Start class is probably the most rewarding for some selected topic you're interested in. I see you've not yet created anything new yourself (which is fine - don't get me wrong), but you could

1135:

As I said, it is a very small sample size. One archive out of 900+ isn't really enough to make any generalizations or anything. If I'm bored, I might look at other archived threads and see how they compare to each other/if there are any signifigant trends. Also, I hope you enjoy your vacation!

2380:

I saw his explanation and your reply after I'd written the above. I think it best to let you run with this for the sake of a few hours, JJBullet seems to relate to you and trust you, I'd just be a stranger upsetting things. If you need to be away for days rather than hours I'll step in, but

2265:

An approach that has received some brainstorming is "quantum portals", meaning portals generated on-the-fly and presented directly on the view screen without any saved portal pages. This could be done by script or as a MediaWiki program feature, but would initially be done by script. The main

4584:

only mentions natural disasters, etc. Should this article be updated to include human action as a cause of extirpation/local extinction? (I don't know where to find sources for this scientific definition.) At this point, neither Wiktionary or WP provide the reader with a good explanation of

1249:

I can understand your frustration. But if you've returned after a long break away, you do have to realise that Knowledge has grown up considerably now. I think there's less concern to get articles created, and more concern to ensure that content now being added meets our high standards of

763:

Unfortunately, Reddit is a user-generate website and is not an acceptable, reliable source, and many sites copy one another's content. A music magazine, book or website under proper editorial/journalistic control would be fine, however, but not blogs or personal websites/social media. See

2100:

which appeared to me to go against consensus on the article's talk page. Sorry if I misunderstood, but I didn't think I had. Please discuss it there, not here, as I was only monitoring vandalism, and you, I'm afraid, appear to be on a one-person campaign to censor articles, as you did at

1592:

for Android now invites users to add Wikidata descriptions to Wikidata objects that have Knowledge articles but no Wikidata descriptions. It will only invite users who have added a number of Wikidata descriptions in the app without being reverted. This is to avoid spam and bad edits.

2365:

Thank you - that's good advice. You'll see I've just replied and await a reply, but am now away for a few hours. I'm happy to contact an admin later re revdel if you aren't able to. i.e. let me know if you do taken any action yourself, so as to avoid duplication of effort. In haste.

3670:

is the skin Wikimedia wikis use for mobile traffic. When a page is protected and you can't edit it you can normally read the source wikicode. This doesn't work on Minerva on mobile devices. This is being fixed. Some text might overlap. This is because your community needs to update

4168:

Doh! I hadn't made the connection at all there! Just saw it and felt an encouraging reply was in order at the start of someone's Knowledge journey. Hope it goes well... must get back to the renovation/redecoration work, or my wife will detect I've stopped! Will be in touch soon.

2925:

I went over your page on adoption and I want to assure you that I understand the basics of the concepts you listed. I can't say I have memorized them but I am aware of all those policies, I take them seriously, and I plan to review them regularly. In addition, I just completed

772:

for how to add an inline citation. The bottom line is that if you can't support a statement that is liable to be challenged by providing a proper reference to a reliable source - simply leave it out. Google Books can sometimes be a good place to search for sources, too.

3094:

still a bit unsure of and would like to get support with. If you can put them in a rough priority order, I can then work through that to get us started. By the way, during the summer the UK here works in UTC+1 hour, so I suspect we'll not be active at the same time.

340:

you will be fine. But you have been running before you can walk, and Knowledge is a serious place with 5.8 million articles that I don't want you messing with until you learn the basics of how to edit encyclopaedia articles (which is why we're all here). Cheers,

5258:: in most wikis, newcomers using the help panel ask questions to the help desk. On Czech Knowledge, we have experimented with sending these questions to mentors instead. This simplifies the newcomer experience, and only led to a increase in mentorship questions 1960:

Actually, embarrassing for me (David notMD) as I am not formally a Teahouse advisor, and also, this relatively recent fascination has taken time from my more skill-set appropriate role in improving articles related to health, nutrition and dietary supplements.

3762:

I'd like to humbly request admission into your adoption program. I've got interests in in History, Photography and Biographies. I recently participated in 2 Wiki programs -WikiGap and Decolonize the internet, both aimed at bridging the gender gap on here.

1191: 5172: 2405:

I just saw your message, and thank you so much to both of you for helping me, if you want to help at all Martin then im more than happy, just because i relate to Nick a bit more doesnt mean i wont take on board what you are saying, best wishes, -

2189:

However, after the purge/reversion is completed, some of the single-page portals might be left, due to having acceptable characteristics (their design varied some). If so, then those could possibly be used as a model to convert and/or build more,

2285:

are perfected. Fortunately, scripts are used on an opt-in basis, and therefore wouldn't affect readers-in-general and editors-at-large during the development process (except for those who wanted to be beta testers and installed the scripts).

1397:

that they reached out to you. I hope that contact helped. Just remember - if you need any support, we're always available at the Teahouse or you can contact us individually on talk pages if you need advice, and aren't in a rush. Best wishes,

1264:

Your explanation makes good sense but I shall probably not be creating any new articles in the future so some editors will need to do so. I have in fact not been away very much but I did change my user name a few years ago after operating as

662:

I had my suspicions based on writing style and a lot of postings at Teahouse, but Levent H. recently posted a not-logged-in screed at Teahouse (deleted by another editor), revealing to be same person as previously blocked for sockpuppetry.

5147:: the team is continuing to engineer on our first "structured task", which will break down the workflow of adding wikilinks to articles, and assist newcomers with an algorithm to identify words and phrases that could be made into links. 3758:

Hello Nick, I am a Nigerian based editor with a background in Media studies and Entrepreneurship. Got registered on Wiki in 2018. Still trying to find my way around really. Stumbled on your intro on WP:Adopt-a-user page and i am hooked.

5182:

We have started to contact more wikis to deploy the features, including Wikipedias of all sizes. Bengali Knowledge recently began using Growth features, and Danish, Thai, Indonesian, and Romanian Wikipedias will be coming soon. Please

2095:

of an editor's talk page, not some random point midway along, please. That's really unhelpful. Errm, no, I haven't used any such word myself. As you saw in the level 3 warning I left on your userpage, I simply reverted your edits to

2315:

The features of Knowledge and its articles will continue to evolve, even if Portals go by the wayside. Most, if not all of portals' functionality, or functions very similar, will likely be made available in some form or other.

2167:

Which puts us back to portals with manually selected content, that need to be maintained by hand, for the most part, for the time being, and back facing some of the same problems we had when we were at this crossroads before:

4464: 1112:

Thank you very much for this, and for previous posts on our adoption page. I'm currently on holiday in Spain, and will endeavour to digest and reply asap over the next few days or so. (Ping me again if I don't!) Meanwhile,

4839: 2699: 1269:

from 2008 and under the present name for a number of years. None of the articles to which I made major contributions has got any more than a B class for quality but it seems no-one else had tried to create them at the

2266:

benefits of this is that it would be opt-in (only those who wanted it would install it), and the resultant generated pages wouldn't be saved, so that there wouldn't be anything to maintain except the script itself.

2251:

And since such development isn't limited to editing, almost anything is possible. If we can't bring readers to portals, we could bring portal features, or even better features, to the readers (i.e., to articles)...

5156: 5151: 3008:. I.e. a dedicated on which we ping one another, keeping everything in one place, though I can't promise to give quick replies most of the time. I have absolutely no issues with anyone going to the Teahouse or to 5143: 2133:

Implementation of the new portal design has been culled back almost completely, and the cull is still ongoing. The cull has also affected portals that existed before the development of the automated design.

2991:

help you, I certainly will. I agree with you that working to get an article to GA or FA level takes tremendous commitment and effort, and it's definitely not something to start off with. (I managed it with

2304:

image, and that activates the slideshow). Future features could also overlap portal features, until there is nothing that portals provide that isn't provided elsewhere or as part of Knowledge's interface.

2244:

And while this isn't generally considered a good rationale for creation or deletion of articles, portals are not articles, and portal critics insist that traffic is a key factor in the utility of portals.

4572:

I had consulted three different sources, but none of them explained the "deliberate human action directed towards that species," connotation so clearly...two of the sources did not mention it at all.

1218:

Hello, Thank you for your message; most of the articles I have created were done in the early years under another user name. It seems that the occasional article I create nowadays gets criticized, e.g,

548:

Oops - blooming heck - yes, better now and I got sidetracked. I'm really sorry about that. I'll take a look tomorrow evening and reply as soon as I can after that. (am off to bed right now I'm afraid).

4527: 905: 2154:

portals are redundant with the corresponding articles, being based primarily on the corresponding navigation footer displayed on each of those articles, and therefore not worth separate pages to do so

4880: 4478: 3141:

and working to resolve a conflict between two new well-intentioned users. Many helpers at Teahouse wouldn't have been so diligent in making sure neither new editor ended up deciding to quit editing.

5293: 5013: 2755:, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: 336:

Thank you. However, I do see far too many apologies from you in the wake of all your activities here, and I don't want to see any more. Just so long as you read and digest the implications of

2900:

Hello, I found your listing on the adoption page and out of all the adopters, I was most interested in you. We share an interest in the sciences (particularly biology, it seems), and also to

2255: 4469:

Because I am not fully understanding any possible manufacturing technology i think it should be a article by a historian familiar but I want exeperts , no catch nothing I expect in return

3970: 4006:

FYI - On 4 Feb, IP 174.3.212.76 (who may be WaussusBeaver not logged in) had deleted all the AfC Declines and a Rejected. I restored those. Same IP had deleted Declines twice before that.

5160: 4632: 4390:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 February. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 February. It will be on all wikis from 25 February (

3855:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 February. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 February. It will be on all wikis from 11 February (

3680: 4580:

example: "The cougar was extirpated across nearly all of its eastern North American range in the two centuries after European colonization." implies that humans were responsible. But

3653:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 February. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 February. It will be on all wikis from 4 February (

1654: 643: 4990: 4861: 4484:

That's never going to happen. Knowledge is not for you to promote stuff, as I had warned you. And now you've gone and got all your accounts blocked. 'Fraid I have little sympathy.

3062:

were created. These both give users much faster responses to quick questions, and really are far better suited to new users. About a year ago I did start to work on a plan to turn

2023:

Yeah, but whilst considered against how many editors are active on Knowledge, that might sound impressive, the reality is I've only actually ever made 37 edits there! (only click

5131: 5009: 1722:

table will be dropped. This will affect some Wikidata tools. They need to be updated. The table has become too big which is causing problems. This will happen on 29 May. You can

1393:

I'm fine thanks - just back from a family holiday abroad. Lots of sun and not too much Knowledge - who could ask for more? LOL! I'm glad you've slowed down and I am grateful to

5212: 3999: 839:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 April. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 April. It will be on all wikis from 18 April (

563:

Ah, that's okay! Thanks for taking the time to reply. It's getting late for me too, I should probably start gettig ready to go to sleep soon as well. Besides, I got to talk to

2120: 4978: 4891: 2783: 4943: 4846: 4682:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 March. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 March. It will be on all wikis from 4 March (

3870: 708: 5196: 2806: 2275:

pop-up there, or as a temporary page. There are scripts that use these approaches (providing unrelated features), and so these approaches have been proven to be feasible.

3556: 2796:

the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions

2346:

Hi Nick. I see you've been keeping an eye on JJBullet. I think his editing on Jnr.void is innocent if misguided. I note that both boys are attached to the same trust,

1671:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 April. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 May. It will be on all wikis from 2 May (

2437:

It's been a while since we've actually talked with your vacation and all that, but I've been learning a lot of stuff on my own. Anyways, one of my drafts passed AFC and

4781: 4061:

THESE STATEMENTS ARE NOT TRUE/NOT GOOD ADVICE. ALWAYS FOLLOW THE POLICIES THAT WIKIPEDIA HAS. EVERYTHING LISTED HERE IN THIS SECTION IS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF HUMOUR

2295: 2161:

Most of the deletions have been made without prejudice to recreation of curated portals, so that approval does not need to be sought at Deletion Review in those cases.

1183: 5104: 4564: 4140: 5194:(it requires a different account that your Wikimedia one). Communities that already have the Growth features being deployed are invited to check on the translations. 4595: 5211:, we ran a test of two variants of the newcomer homepage, meant to find a version that increases users completing suggested edits. We have completed the experiment, 3979:

answers, as I need specific details, so highlight issues if there are any).17:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)17:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)17:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)~

3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3041: 2973: 2942: 2889: 2027:

if you really need proof). I always tell my daughters that I am actually the 71st best father in the world because, well, I'm happy to be that high up on that list!

4550:

No your alright in my books I hope it doesn’t get turned down Daniel Hand High School has been playing Hand Football also that’s why I put the links down there for

1434: 4994: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2453:(check out today's article for improvement for an example). I've been busy (and will remain so until the weekend) but I figured I should write an update of sorts. 2310: 1554: 882: 380:

I cannot do that as I am not an administrator, nor is that the right way to proceed. Just unplug the computer and only use it for key tasks - that's the best way.

2212:

There are currently around 100 curated portals. Based on the predominant reasoning at MfD, it seems likely that all the other portals may be subject to deletion.

5166: 5005: 3469: 3276: 1018: 2848: 2837: 5016: 4982: 3833:

extension will come to Meta on 11 February. There you can see entries on watched pages on different wikis on the same page. The new watchlist will be found on

2572: 4701: 4432: 4327:

to find images. You can search for images on Commons in the visual editor when you are looking for illustrations. This is to help editors find better images.

4155: 3938: 3721: 2616: 1751: 926: 4642:

is now available. It enables cropping, trimming, audio disabling, and rotating video content. It is being created as part of the developer outreach programs.

3473: 2558: 652: 4493: 4134: 3320: 2390: 2375: 4835: 3051: 3037: 2987: 2969: 2938: 2014: 1950: 4721: 4452: 3958: 3741: 2269: 2241:

default portals, was that portals simply do not get much traffic. Typically, they get a tiny fraction of what the corresponding like-titled articles get.

2114: 1771: 946: 817: 5055: 5051: 1394: 337: 3186: 715: 4015: 3776: 3269: 2710: 1118: 1011: 4793: 4733: 4369:

might have removed all text from it. This was because of a bug and has been fixed. You might need to edit the timeline again for it to show properly.

3200: 3168: 3103: 3045: 3022: 2977: 2963: 1350: 1279: 1259: 4206: 2930:

last night. I left the badges on my page as proof but I'll be deleting them soon for cleanliness. I also glanced at how you made a separate page for

2281:

The various components of the automated portal design are transcluded excerpts, news, did you know, image slideshows, excerpt slideshows, and so on.

5245: 2000: 1327: 987: 688: 506:

Thank you very much for your email. The information you provided was very interesting, and I will definitely monitor the situation from here on in.

144: 5047: 4785: 3682: 2516: 2499: 2128: 2006: 1536: 1159: 1145: 1130: 993: 758: 742: 576: 558: 4338: 4043: 3830: 3239: 2526: 1970: 782: 644:

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kashmir-newspapers-publish-blank-front-pages-to-protest-govts-decision-to-stop-ads-to-two-dailies-5619019/

637: 5081: 4815: 4559: 4544: 4513: 3533: 2866: 2235: 2148: 2036: 2018: 2010: 1984: 1946: 1426: 1407: 1049:

16 editors who had asked questions had edited since the start of 2019 (some were more active than others, but none of these editors were blocked)

971: 515: 414: 389: 368: 350: 331: 313: 279: 266: 251: 208: 190: 3245: 3233: 1954: 5063: 4178: 3251: 2650: 1007: 291: 222: 3889: 981: 5086: 5059: 4986: 3538: 3434: 3408: 3221: 2871: 1723: 1504: 1498: 1492: 1486: 1480: 1474: 890: 4628: 4366: 2954:

It might take a while for Nick to get back to you since he's been on a vacation. I just thought I should let you know since I was pinged :)

2141:

Portals receive insufficient traffic, making it a waste of editor resources to maintain them, especially for narrow-scope or "micro" portals

1629: 714:

When you add an edit summary the VisualEditor will search your recent edit summaries in case you want to re-use one. This works in both the

4639: 3265: 2937:

Anyway, thank you for your time in reading this and your consideration. I hope you are not too busy because we seem to be a very good fit!

2194:

the discussions on portal creation and design guidelines have reached a community consensus on what is and is not acceptable for a portal.

1028: 649: 5208: 4789: 3628: 3227: 2672: 1608: 355:

Im Probably going to stop editing on the wiki until i can get my personal issues sorted, can you block me from editing for 24 hours please

121: 4939: 4499: 4228: 3286: 2334: 999: 4777: 2288:

The development of such scripts falls under the scope of the Javascript-WikiProject/Userscript-department, and will likely be listed on

719: 672: 5076: 3753: 3528: 2861: 1783: 1341:- kittens are always welcomed here in this household...so long as they've been neutered and wear a bell to warn off birdlife. Regards, 4872:

userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at

4288: 2582: 2359: 2172:

Manually maintained portals are not scalable (they are labor intensive, and there aren't very many editors available to maintain them)

1695:

You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on

863:

You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on

4767: 4324: 4096: 3352: 3257: 3191:

Interstellarity, yeah, I was looking for "Barnstar of New-user Handholding and Encouragement" but that one strangely doesn't exist --

1099: 599: 5276: 5175:

the analysis of the impact of newcomer tasks. We announced that we found that the Growth features, and particularly newcomer tasks,

1311: 4885:

place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions

4504:

I would like to review the draft page if you see any mistakes I added References and stuff on there I think your going to like it.

2946: 2209:

A major theme in the deletion discussions was the need for portals to be curated, that is, each one having a dedicated maintainer.

1516: 1150:

Thanks. Jim might give you a link to a video of his, giving an interesting breakdown of Teahouse questions a couple of years back.

164: 5191: 4709: 4697: 4615: 4601: 4440: 4428: 4410: 4311: 4297: 3946: 3934: 3797: 3782: 3729: 3717: 3578: 3563: 1759: 1747: 1576: 1561: 1170: 1078:

In total, 2 articles that had failed AFC were resubmitted and failed again by 2 editors who had asked question(s) at the Teahouse.

1058:

3 additional threads were started by editors who had previously asked questions at the Teahouse (limited to this specific archive)

934: 922: 804: 789: 695: 4184: 3150: 1522: 4653: 1236: 2562: 2507:

whether or not it was the right one. This sounds like an interesting suggestion to prevent that from happening in the future.

318:

I am extremely sorry to everyone that has been offended by whats been going on, i have not meant to hurt anyone in the process

2078: 2064: 4738: 4705: 4436: 3942: 3725: 3438: 3412: 3325: 2841: 2531: 2164:

In addition to new portals being deleted, most of the portals that were converted to an automated design have been reverted.

1755: 1734:

Wikimedia wikis will soon use a token when you log out. This changes how the API works. Some tools might need to be updated.

930: 493: 282:, which also had your configuration. Instead of adding those pages to a page in his userspace, they were added to your page. 3810: 2462: 1589: 5100: 4873: 4585:"extirpated", unless we link to your cmts on Ddum5347's talkpage!! Thanks for your consideration, hope you are well! Best, 4130: 3972: 3552: 3315: 2885: 2427: 1038:

I saw your comment earlier about interest in a study what % of users at the Teahouse are blocked. Here's what I found in a

626: 535: 4999:

authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.

2260: 653:

https://www.newslaundry.com/2018/06/19/kashmir-woke-up-to-blank-editorials-in-newspapers-today-in-memory-of-shujaatbukhari

4066:

If you have a COI, and you don't want to declare it, don't! (For all we know, a dog could be writing this statement ;) )

4021: 3994: 2091:

Hi there. Thanks for coming over to my talk page to discuss any concerns you have, but please take care to post messages

181:

talk page in due course. In the meantime be advised that editing other users pages and subpages is taken very seriously.

5285: 3838: 750: 3888:

Some services will not work for a short period of time from 07:00 UTC on 17 February. There might be problems with new

1461: 1190:

now shows which namespaces you search in. The namespace field is collapsed by default on the search page. You can also

958: 741:

Hicks From The Sticks compilation, who in turn approached Polygram, the newly formed amalgam of Polydor and Phonogram”

4614: