User talk:Nick Moyes

302:

and annoyance than helpful comments). BUT (and it's a very big 'but'): I believe you made it in good faith because of your views, and that I don't think you deserved one of our low level templated notices left by one of my fellow administrators. It's very easy to be irritated by these impersonal templated messages, but please appreciate that it's a huge task ensuring that this encyclopaedia is kept running smoothly and sometimes we make mistakes. I know I do - even after 11+ years here. So, my advice is to try to see it from the other person's viewpoint, whilst considering how useful any particular comment is to take forward any debate. I might probably also have removed it with an edit summary saying 'not really very helpful', but wouldn't have left a message on your talk page. However, it could be argued that explaining to you (via a templated message) what I had done, it would at least have communicated clearly what my actions were and why. You might otherwise have wondered what happened to your edit. So, it's a balance thing.

635: 1617:. This will categorize the page into Category:Commons protected edit requests, which administrators regularly check. If this does not work, please post a request at the Administrators' noticeboard. You may also contact any administrator on their talk page or by email. Be sure to specify the exact title of the page you are trying to create or edit, and if it might be misunderstood (for example a page with an unusual name), consider explaining briefly what you want to do. If you wrote any text, save it temporarily on your computer until you can edit it. If you think it is an error that you cannot edit, move or create this page, please report the page title (and the entry on the title blacklist) to the Administrators' noticeboard. Thank you. 417: 12117:, I can see she was a main character. But I think you're asking whether you could create a whole new article about that fictional character? If so, it would only really be OK to do that if that character had been written about in detail and in depth by numerous independent sources analysing the character, its cultural impact and so on. Somehow I doubt this applies to your examples, but you could ask on the talk page of each article and suggest the content and sources you would wish to use. What we don't accept here (ever) is people's person opinions of observations of what a character did in a programme. The only exception is when summarising Plot elements of a programme. 5952: 1678:

another image with the same title may well exist. That's why it's sensible to upload well-named images. Secondly, it looks like that title is a default numbering taken from Whatsapp. So an automatic filter will have stopped the upload to prevent the likelihood of images taken directly from social media (without the photographer's permission) being uploaded to Knowledge or to Wikimedia Commons. If you are the copyright owner, then I suggest you retitle the image and try again. If you were not the original photographer, then you have no legal right to release it for free commercial use on Knowledge, and should revert to the original photo in the article.

7288: 12156:. But, as you've made the effort to approach me, I'd be happy to answer a batch of questions that you might have if you care to post them below. Or give me some idea of the areas of interest or concern that you might have in which you'd seek support. It may take me a few days to reply as I'm about to go on a trip for a week. Other editors do take on very new users, but I prefer to see and support editors who seek a better understanding of policies and procedures, having already invested the effort in gaining the basics for themselves. Sorry if this isn't quite what you wanted, but do feel free to ask away! Regards from the UK, 403: 682: 5960: 7740:

it's OK to say "according to". But that would enable you to then add, "However, other academics believe that xxxx is the case", and to offer appropriate citations (one citation if one person published their disagreement, or multiple citations if you can show the original quoted source may well be viewed as incorrect by multiple experts. That then gives two different interpretations of which mathematicians were the last to have a full grasp of the entire branch of mathematics (which I assume was the intended meaning of the statement.

9033: 396: 389: 9773:, due to a June 24 decision by the Wikimedia Foundation to support software development on both platforms. Gerrit and GitLab are both code repositories used by developers to write, review, and deploy the software code that supports the MediaWiki software that the wiki projects are built on, as well as the tools used by editors to create and improve content. This decision will safeguard the productivity of our developers and prevent problems in code review from affecting our users. More details are available in the 2243: 10363: 6856: 10065: 5665: 11311: 10676: 10643: 8481: 7087: 7023: 1710: 1228: 1154: 1061: 2738: 11916: 11904: 11883: 11871: 10697: 10653: 9490: 8551: 8519: 8491: 7099: 7066: 7033: 5760: 4468: 4411: 3119: 3107: 3086: 3033: 1238: 1164: 1071: 11160:(PTAC) has been extended to September 16. Members will help by providing advice to Foundation Product and Technology leadership on short and long term plans, on complex strategic problems, and help to get feedback from more contributors and technical communities. Selected members should expect to spend roughly 5 hours per month for the Council, during the one year pilot. Please consider applying, and spread the word to volunteers you think would make a positive contribution to the committee. 43: 9464: 4390: 3012: 1192: 1108: 1051: 1882:. Thanks for asking. It's important to point out that we do not permit editors to alter their own Knowledge articles, unless it relates to removing uncited/unsubstantiated statements which might be false or libellous. Only content sourced from independent publications should ever be added (e.g. books, magazines, newspapers and news websites etc) User-generated content such as IMDb, personal blogs or websites, social media, interviews with the subject, etc are not accepted. 529: 25: 2278: 411: 706: 12482: 12466: 12388: 11457: 11113: 11085: 10535: 10454: 9839: 9762: 9258:

junior school. Went on national TV news the other week, being interviewed about a peregrine falcon conservation and webcam project I've been involved with for the last 15 years. And recently ran an online Knowledge training session of international astronomers involved in education, but haven't had much time for any other Knowledge activities or admin work. So, keeping busy and trying to keep fit! There's never enough time in the day! Cheers,

11505:, which are groups of wishes that share a problem. Focus Areas were created for the newly reopened Community Wishlist, which is now open year-round for submissions. The first batch of focus areas are specific to moderator workflows, around welcoming newcomers, minimizing repetitive tasks, and prioritizing tasks. Once volunteers have reviewed and voted on focus areas, the Foundation will then review and select focus areas for prioritization. 12340: 11498: 713: 7869: 8860: 8767: 8708: 8688: 8271: 8255: 8046: 7527: 7500: 7338: 7320: 5394: 5381: 4765: 4083: 3788: 18: 8985: 8882: 8747: 8441: 8315: 8026: 7480: 7353: 6440: 6120: 6066: 5902: 5433: 5181: 4804: 4061: 3768: 5489:

end, it's down to any consensus being determined on an article's talk page. I wouldn't want to see such a section added just to get around a consensus view that one extra, obscure name isn't needed. Such a section might look at etymology - and Grigson's 'Dictionary of English plant Names' - would be a brilliant source for a section on non-scientific names. Maybe there's something equivalent in the animal world, I don't know?

8110: 362:, someone will eventually want to take well-written properly published newspapers, journals or books that talk about you and your life and use them to create a page about you. If you can show that you have been "worthy of notice" by the world at large (and not just by you, your friends and your family), then you may well merit a Knowledge entry here. Feel free to give me links or references to three such 11252: 6292: 557: 9784:(PTAC). This group will bring technical contributors and Wikimedia Foundation together to co-define a more resilient, future-proof technological platform. Council members will evaluate and consult on the movement's product and technical activities, so that we develop multi-generational projects. We are looking for a range of technical contributors across the globe, from a variety of Wikimedia projects. 965:

edit space, the submit button is not there. If I go back to the read space after adding the new code, it does not show the new version but the old version of the article. I apologise, but I still need more instructions on how to edit the draft you created and still get to click on the submit button. It was more straightforward on the Finnish Knowledge, so I am really struggling with this technically.

11895: 10688: 9455: 8542: 7078: 5751: 4459: 3098: 1099: 3810: 2319:). So, do please look at those two pages and assess whether or not you feel your musical fame has reached the point where you merit an article about you here. If you think you do, please point me to the sources that talk about you, your life and your achievements. Bear in mind that personal websites, social media pages, IMdB and other user-generated content is not accepted as a 4682:

this sounds like a relatively minor fact, we would normally accept a reference to the school's own website or other publications where it is clear that "academisation" has taken place, and when. If you can't find a source, then do not add stuff that you "happen to know", as we need all articles to be verifiable by other people with access to those publications or websites.

1433:. No, I'm afraid not. Not unless the celebrity is dead and there are no other freely licenced images available. You cannot simply take (=steal) a copyrighted image from the internet and add it to an article about a living person. We take copyright theft very seriously. I assume you didn't take the images yourself? If you had, then there would be no issue. Does that help? 7975:, and you are free to contribute to these. But you must NOT add your personal opinions to any article. That is not how we work. All factual statements liable to be challenged must be supported with citations to reliably published sources such as books, research journals and mainstream news websites. Blogs and privately published websites are not accepted here as sources. 12603:

really who is behind this agenda. It must be super powerful to stand up to such a strange occurance. If there is no identifiable source, how about your personable opinion. Do you as an individual not find this entire scene questionable? Are you allowed to have a personal opinion? Inquiring minds want to know. Is there an inimitable danger of life or death for asking.

11538: 9295:, and you will learn how to add citations to support new content. Writing new articles is very very hard, especially for a new editor. So start slowly and learn the basics of editing and improving articles. You have a 'Homepage' tab which offers you an opportunity to make small improvements in one of several different areas to get you off to a good start. 2099:

take it slowly and carefully. Print out a copy of the article. Read it line by line (out loud). Does the English flow? Is every factual statement cited to a reliable source? Have you been able to find some of the key books on the subject from your local library and to use them to guide you? Match every GA criterion to every single sentence and reference.

6510:. Simply 'existing' isn't sufficient. Everything written here must be based upon properly published sources that are not user-generated. i.e. we don't accept IMDB, blogs, personal websites etc. Unless you can find this series has been covered in mainstream media, then I'm afraid you would be wasting your time trying to promote it here. Do please read 5421: 849:). In other words, he either must evidently meet the sports notability criteria, OR he must have had a number of in depth and detailed articles in newspapers, magazines etc that have independently written about him and his life and achievements. I might have expected to see a page on Finnish Knowledge, but I see there is not one as yet. 5011:, then the answer is your draft article will not be published. It's as simple as that. Everything you add to Knowledge must be based upon what published sources say, albeit written in your own words. You cannot simply add content based upon either your personal knowledge or your imagination, nor what the topic says about itself. See 1970:- is this the one you mean? You can edit an article yourself, though not simply from things you personally happen to know about it. You must first find reliable, published sources (not personal blogs, personal websites opr social media). So, books, old newspapers, jopurnals or online news outlets are required. Make the improvements 2184:. If you're a brand new Knowledge editor, that's a pretty good spot! I took a look and it's mostly unsourced promotional content about a company's products, without any evidence that other, independent sources have taken note of the company and have written about it. I did a quick Google search and couldn't find much to support our 6987:. Welcome to Knowledge. It's not appropriate to add a photo of yourself to Knowledge. As a new user, please focus instead on improving this encyclopaedia of notable subjects, rather than trying to create a 'profile page' about yourself. It would probably be deleted if you were to try, as your userpage is there just for you to say 2073:. If you had asked at the Teahouse, I'd probably be just as likely to have answered you there! It looks a meaty article, and you should be aware that these things take a lot of preparation, time and commitment. I do have experience of spending 6 months or more getting one shortish list article up to a full-blown GA article (see 2884:). I would expect there to be mainstream media reporting of the series, in the form of reviews, behind the scenes stories, magazine articles about it, etc. Be aware that IMdB consists of user-generated content and is not regarded as especially reliable - certainly not as the main source. BTW: Ref seems especially irrelevant. 9554: 347:. Thanks for your question. We would never advise anyone to attempt to create a Knowledge encyclopaedia article about themselves. It stands to reason that anyone who wants to write about themselves is never independent of the subject and, despite knowing an awful lot about themselves, they are inevitably 6191:, you will see that it should simply summarise the reasons for notability without getting too technical. If you could simplify the lead, whilst emphasising reasons for notability, I think you may stand a chance of seeing this through into the main encyclopaedia. I hope this helps. Regards from the UK, 11677:

So, I think by now you appreciate your edits weren't acceptable to this encyclopaedia. But, if you were the inventor of these games, simply take pleasure in knowing that others enjoy them, too. But I'm afraid without independent sources to verify your claim, it simply can't go in - no matter how true

11053:

Editors using tracking categories to identify which pages use specific extensions may notice that six of the categories have been renamed to make them more easily understood and consistent. These categories are automatically added to pages that use specialized MediaWiki extensions. The affected names

10613:

to understand why we discourage even notable people from writing articles about themselves - they are rarely ever likely to be neutral in what they choose to present, even if there are independent mainstream sources available (books, news media, journals etc) which do talk about them in detail and in

10259:

Editors using the Visual Editor in languages that use non-Latin characters for numbers, such as Hindi, Manipuri and Eastern Arabic, may notice some changes in the formatting of reference numbers. This is a side effect of preparing a new sub-referencing feature, and will also allow fixing some general

9795:

features. These features include a new feed of Recent Changes, related links such as Undo and Rollback, and the ability to create and save a personal library of user talk messages to use while patrolling. If your wiki wants to make these features available to users who do not have rollback rights but

9411:

I'm sorry - I hope I haven't put you off. But, yes, I do appreciate that Knowledge can take some getting used to. I mentored an Emeritus Professor in marine geophysics a couple of years ago, helping him understand the difference in approach between academic publishing and Knowledge editing so that he

8080:

Good question. A quick skim made me feel you could be justified in doing that. I feel the lead is too short and could be written in plain English before getting technical later on. I suggest you also leave a note on the talk page explaining your reasons and making suitable suggestions for improvement

7982:

for creating your first article. Be aware that making a new page is extremely challenging - especially for a new editor with no experience. So my advice is to gain a fair bit of editing experience by working to improve existing articles first. I will leave you a welcome message with some useful links

7757:

in that particular field, we would need to see links to good sources which demonstrate they've publish nonsense in a discredited work. You personal opinions of that author are not relevant of of interest to Knowledge (good published sources are) even if you are the world's expert in that field. There

7739:

Now, when I see any sentence that begins "According to person X...", I would expect to see an exact quote from person X and a citation to let me verify that statement. It needs to be letter perfect, including any typos in the original source. Of course, it might not be a mainstream view (which is why

6618:

for more details. But, in this instance, simply do not attempt to develop this any further, as it will then be liable for deletion as we're not a free hosting service, and editors who try to use Knowledge for their own purposes (rather than helping to build an encyclopaedia of notable things) tend to

4681:

The term " academisation" suggest a process your school has gone through to convert it from one operating sytem to another. Is that right? Well, the answer is that you can add a statement to a Knowledge article, providing you can support it with a citation (inline reference) to a published source. As

1784:

If you don't own the image, you cannot simply take other people's pictures and upload them as if they were yours. Unless the person is deceased, all images must on Knowledge must have either been released into the public domain, or be licenced with a Creative Commons Commercial Re-use (CC-BY-SA). Do

1747:

Thank you. Your news caught me unawares -I've been extremely busy IRL recently, and hadn't even seen your RFA (though I did have words about recommending you quite some while ago). I am so, so pleased to see you've 'got the mop'. You've been amazing to watch over the years, and I know you're going to

856:

All your sources seem to be just short results pages. We would prefer to see factual statements about him and his life/achievements cited to longer newspaper articles, etc. I see you've linked to some as External Links", but these are best used as proper sources and citations. Every factual statement

12553:

You might therefore prefer first to use the article's 'Talk Page' to first suggest the edit you propose to make and to wait for a few days to get feedback from other editors. Or you could let me know exactly what text you want to add or remove and I can advise you whether it looks ok, or not (that's

11673:

from your current IPv6 address. Not only was it reverted because it linked to a private website (which is unacceptable, as explained above), but it was also wholly unencyclopaedic in its tone. We don't ever ask chatty questions and answer them in articles: we present facts in a neutral tone of voice

11512:

is a twice a year program for people to participate in a paid internship that will start in December 2024 and end in early March 2025, and they need mentors and projects to work on. Projects can be focused on coding or non-coding (design, documentation, translation, research). See the Outreachy page

11464:

feature on test2wiki. This was done to allow cross-wiki testing of temporary accounts, for when temporary accounts switch between projects. The feature was enabled on testwiki a few weeks ago. No further temporary account deployments are scheduled yet. Temporary Accounts is a project to create a new

10617:

In future, please avoid asking the same question in two venues in the space of a couple of hours. This wastes volunteer time. I have deleted your userpage as it is not intended to be a place for you to promote your CV, and your sandbox has also been removed for the same reason. Should you ever prove

10294:

There are new features and improvements to Phabricator from the Release Engineering and Collaboration Services teams, and some volunteers, including: the search systems, the new task creation system, the login systems, the translation setup which has resulted in support for more languages (thanks to

10236:

Sorry to sound negative. But only when the world at large has taken notice of something - by publishing major mainstream media articles about them (and I don't mean via personal blogs or social media posts) - does Knowledge generally have any interest in seeing an article about them. If and when you

9855:

Editors who upload files cross-wiki, or teach other people how to do so, may wish to join a Wikimedia Commons discussion. The Commons community is discussing limiting who can upload files through the cross-wiki upload/Upload dialog feature to users auto-confirmed on Wikimedia Commons. This is due to

7761:

If you still believe this important article contains an error, I would advise posting your concerns on the article talk page and letting a discussion ensue. We work by reasoned arguments and consensus here, so I am confident you will be able to win over editors if you explain your concerns and offer

7715:

It is, however, very common for new editors to have the 'good faith' edits reverted if they didn't go about things as well as they might - especially when made to very popular pages with high visitor numbers. But don't be dismayed. What I would advise here on en.wiki (and also for you on fr.wiki) is

6935:

Whichever way you do it, the important thing to appreciate is that you add each citation ‘’within’’ the article text (immediately after the statement you want to support), but a special template in the 'References' section then displays all the citations together within that section, and with just a

4901:

It is extremely hard for a total newcomer to successfully create a new article, so please spend a few weeks learning how to edit, how to add citations, and how Knowledge works in general before you dive into article creation. I will leave a link on your talk page to our pages teaching you the basics

2217:

which may also count somewhat towards notability. But, yes, a severe trim down and introduction of good sources would help a lot. If you want to give it a go and let me know when you're done, I'll happily take another look. Meanwhile, I've left a welcome message and some useful links for you on your

2098:

I like your commitment and note you've made 29 edits to the article, thus far, and 92 edits here in total. That's not to denigrate your efforts, but I wonder how familiar you are as yet with all our key policies. It looks like you do know what you're doing. But my advice is not to rush at it, but to

924:

Hi Nick, it took a bit longer but now I have tried to address all the points you raised, and in the meantime, the page on the Finnish Knowledge has been published. However, I am having problems with submitting the draft. When I start to edit the drat that you kindly created for me, the submit button

886:

helpful feedback if a draft isn't yet suitable so that you can understand what further work or fixing might be needed. Unfortunately, there is a huge backlog (many thousands) so it may take up to a three months for a volunteer to review if. Should that not happen, it will then automatically be moved

11587:

If it doesn't exist on two language wikipedia, it does suggest to me that it was not regarded as notable as a stand alone article by Knowledge's definition of the word. Do you have any independent sources that talk about it in detail and in depth - not just a set of rules on a website? There is of

9992:

Have you ever wondered how Wikimedia software works across over 300 languages? This is 253 languages more than the Google Chrome interface, and it's no accident. The Language and Product Localization Team at the Wikimedia Foundation supports your work by adapting all the tools and interfaces in the

9975:

analytics dashboard. The dashboard offers organizations analytics on things like monthly edits in a category, the most viewed files, and which Wikimedia articles are using Commons images. As a result of these new data dumps, GLAM organisation can more reliably measure their return on investment for

7769:

Please bear in mind that the approach outlined above is based on my experience as an administrator here on English Knowledge. And the policies and pages I have linked to relate to en.wiki. Ways of doing things could be different on French Knowledge - but somehow I doubt it. We all care about making

7752:

was. So you could, if you wished, go first to their talk page and apologise for causing apparent harm to the page, but then explain your intentions were well-meaning and expand upon your concerns and recommendations for improved wording and additions. Support everything with recommended wording and

7723:

even when it's not. A far better way is to attempt to reword and improve upon the cited statement, plus offering a counter interpretation if there is one. Bear in mind that, whilst we really welcome experts in their field, Wikipedias of all language don't want edits based on what individuals know,

6183:

you may have) that you focus on showing, in simple terms, the contribution he has made to medical science. Maybe as author of key textbooks used in teaching; media coverage of his medical achievements; biographies written by other people in prestigious magazines etc; winner of notable awards (i.e.

3623:

What you would do is create a Draft article, work on it until it's of encyclopaedic quality, and you're confident you've demonstrated 'Notability'. Then you'd submit it for review and get useful feedback from a reviewer. There's a huge backlog at present, so it could take up anything up to a couple

2126:

I support what you're wanting to do, and I hope my suggestions don't in any way put you off. You might want to consider saying a little bit about your editing interests or background by creating your userpage. I always tend to take those editors more seriously who have taken the time to explain why

2022:

where someone intentionally makes a wikilink to a page title that has never existed. The rationale is that they believe the topic is sufficiently notable to deserve a page here, even though nobody has yet to create it. These redlinks are useful in guiding other editors to consider whether to create

12545:

TBH: Your nine edits here so far don't lead me to feel totally confident in your ability to write in good English and spelling, or that you don't yet fully understand how Knowledge works. But, providing you can meet these requirements, you are permitted to edit it once you have 10 edits under your

9257:

Hello, my old friend. Good to hear from you. I've just checked your contributions and, boy, you have been busy! Likewise, I'm keeping good and active. Lots of mountain hiking and building work in the garden. One kid is about to head off to Japan for a year doing TEFL work; another is teaching in a

9003:

Starting 26 June, all talk pages messages' timestamps will become a link at English Knowledge, making this feature available for you to use at all wikis. This link is a permanent link to the comment. It allows users to find the comment they were linked to, even if this comment has since been moved

6354:

I see the user has deleted previous warnings about adding commentary or non-neutral content. That makes no difference, so any future warning can be given at the next level up, even though they've curiously just left one low-level warning notice on their page. Crafty! I always look through a user's

6167:

The content appears to be factually correct, though written as if it were more of a CV or LinkedIn profile, than a biographical encyclopaedia article based on sources unrelated to the subject. I sense you may well have a connection to the subject. This is not an issue in itself, unless you fail to

5488:

Sorry - I overlooked replying to this post from you. In general, and providing you can demonstrate that a 'common English name' is genuinely in common use by being able to show a number of high quality sources that haven't simply misinterpreted a name, then I don't have a problem with that. In the

3948:

You can create a short userpage which explains your interests in editing Knowledge, and a little bit about you, by clicking the "Create" tab, typing your text, then clicking 'publish'. But don't create a CV or Profile page about yourself as you might do on LinkedIn, or it will be disallowed. Every

2689:

For annoying legal reasons, what used to be labelled “Save” was renamed “Publish” because you are still putting your draft edits online. But that’s not the same as “publishing an article on Knowledge” - you can still work on your draft and save edits to it until you reach the point where you think

2120:

formatting that I don't have time to look at for you right now. Then, when you've addressed everything flagged up, consider the GA nomination, but not before. You'd be advised to time any nomination for a point in your life when you're sufficiently free to commit to addressing any GA issues raised

1677:

Now, you've given me the image filename you tried to upload. I'm no expert on Wikimedia Commons messaging, but it looks like you failed to give the image an informative title, and simply uploaded one with an automatically-generated year and image number. Firstly, that's not always possible because

301:

you made to the Vector 2022 discussion. I do know that page has attracted a huge amount of heated debate - sometimes from very new users who've just come to complain, so it's important to have contributions that take the discussions forward. I don't think yours was especially helpful (more hot air

12283:

Users of all Wikis will have access to Wikimedia sites as read-only for a few minutes on September 25, starting at 15:00 UTC. This is a planned datacenter switchover for maintenance purposes. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming

10799:. I'm fine, thank you very much. Just spent a glorious day with my family down at Kew Gardens in London, and am enjoying my retirement. However, I do seem to have less and less time for Knowledge at the moment. But I see you've been very busy working on the Fescues. Keep up the good work! Cheers, 9672:

extension is now available on Meta-wiki, Igbo Knowledge, and Swahili Knowledge, and can be requested on your wiki. This extension helps in managing and making events more visible, giving Event organizers the ability to use tools like the Event registration tool. To learn more about the deployment

3915:

Finally, I'd say it is advisable to prepare a 'draft' article before putting it into the encyclopaedia. That way, you can work on it and improve it until it meets our notability criteria and other requirements for formatting, sourcing etc. It is best to use the article creation process, available

3550:

Errm, I need to point out a problem with your username. Unfortunately, we prohibit anyone using a name that could suggest it is an automated bot account (unless it is actually a functioning bot - orf which there are many doing useful service on Knowledge). Please consider requesting a name change

3349:

No - you actually added a promotional external link to you business, which was reverted for good reason! Do not do that again, please. You may use articles in reliable media to support a factual statement, but you will be blocked from editing if you try to abuse Knowledge be linking to commercial

2607:

The first step is to find properly published sources that you can cite that demonstrate that this person is notable. Archives and personal papers are not suitable- they need to be in a form that anyone with access to the internet, a lending library or a bookshop on the other side of the world can

2104:

I suggest you post your aspiration on the article's Talk page and invite comments or suggestions for anything you feel still needs work. You could ping any past users who are still active -especially those who worked on past GA nominations. User: Merbaru is certainly still around, and was editing

1006:

As an aside: we were forced by legal requirements from the Wikimedia Foundation about 2 years ago to accept a name change from 'Save changes' to 'Publish changes' and it has not helped new users. But there is literally nothing we can do about the confusion this occasionally causes. The reality is

964:

Hi again, I am sorry for being so helpless with this, but I do not understand how I can not be editing...? I mean when I go to the draft you created, I need to click on edit, so that I can actually import the corrections and amendments you pointed out, right? When I have put the right code in the

366:

and I will give you a quick opinion on whether you would merit such an article. Please don't supply links to your own social media pages, personal blogs, LinkedIn page or your own website - just offer those which you are completely unconnected to who have felt it worthwhile to write about you and

305:

I don't mean to be rude, but I suspect that English may not be your first language, and so it can be hard for people like me to see past the unintended blunt words to the intended contribution behind them (I know when I go to German speaking countries I must sound terribly rude at times because I

12602:

A or simple question, sir. Would your answer be the came if the 95% referred to Chinese or Aleutions in Alaska or a pygmy tribe in South America or a couple of hundred Albinos from all over the world? I see it as an anomaly of one distinct race monopolizing the advertising world. My question is

9369:

So, I must apologise for not being able to give you a better answer, but do welcome your desire to see an improvement to an article. Let me know if I can be of further help. Oh, and I've left a welcome message on your user talk page with some helpful links about editing and getting started here.

6683:

Whichever way you do it, the important thing to appreciate is that you add each citation within the article text (immediately after the statement you want to support), but a special template in the 'References' section then displays all the citations together within that section, and with just a

6385:

or two, as this helps you and them understand what you're concerned about, and why. Add their userpage to your Watchlist for a month or two and keep half an eye open for other warnings they may have been left. You can simply revert uncited additions if they're contentious (and say 'citations are

5220:

will no longer ask whether you want to leave the page without saving. This will prevent the “information you’ve entered may not be saved” popups from appearing when no information have been entered. It will also make file pages on Commons load faster in certain cases. However, the popups will be

4685:

Nobody is going to 'block' you from editing for making an edit in all good faith, even if it ends up being reverted. We only block editors who are either acting as a vandal by intentionally disrupting articles, or who refuse to listen to the advice or follow policies they have had pointed out to

8014:

New changes have been made to the UploadWizard in Wikimedia Commons: the overall layout has been improved, by following new styling and spacing for the form and its fields; the headers and helper text for each of the fields was changed; the Caption field is now a required field, and there is an

5492:

However, Knowledge, because of its popularity, does have the ability to promulgate false information if what's added is taken from poor sources. So, it's a case of being sensible, and not trying to disrupt a page to make a point because one happens to have found an unusual name used in a single

11595:

What more would you be hoping to add, and what sources would you expect to be using? Your own website would NOT be acceptable as a source for your claim of having invented it - or for anything else. It would need to be sourced to a book or professional website or magazine which has independent

11116:

Your help is needed to check if any pages need to be moved or deleted. A maintenance script was run to clean up unreachable pages (due to Unicode issues or introduction of new namespaces/namespace aliases). The script tried to find appropriate names for the pages (e.g. by following the Unicode

9365:

The best approach to make any suggestion for change is to clearly identify the text and equally clearly offer an alternative wording. I appreciate that it's much harder to do that when equations are involved, as it takes some understanding of our wikimarkup for maths symbols (something I'm not

7711:

did attempt to resolve poor grammar and possibly an incorrect statement. But my French (and use of Google Translate) may not give me the best view of the subject, and I did think the message left for you sounded rather harsh. (We get similar complaints about our templated messages here too, of

6605:

As far as I'm concerned, you can keep what's in your sandbox as I would simply regard it as a place where you can learn and experiment with editing techniques. It's not an article, and is not indexed by Google. However, abandoned drafts are deleted after 6 months, and my firm advice is not to

3953:

for creating an article in English, here. But, be aware: it's a very difficult task for any newcomer to successfully create an article from scratch without first learning the basics of editing and improving existing articles. You wouldn't get into a car for the very first time and set off up a

9801: 7666:

Everything added here must be based on published books, magazines, newspapers, scientific journals or reliably published online websites or mainstream news outlets. There is no place for content based on personal blogs, private websites, self-published vanity books or social media, nor are we

8951:

Editors will notice that there have been some changes to the background color of text in the diff view, and the color of the byte-change numbers, last week. These changes are intended to make text more readable in both light mode and dark mode, and are part of a larger effort to increase

10224:

So, simply doing something (such as writing a book, producing a music album, staging an art exhibition, building an office block, or becoming filthy rich) is never going to justify that person trying to create a Knowledge article about themselves - sorry. Knowledge is not to be used for

3992:

Welcome to Knowledge! I have left a welcome message for you on your talk page. It contains a link to getting started with editing. It’s a huge learning curve at the start - so take it slowly to begin with and practice making small edits to gain a better understanding of how things work

5080:

The downwards/upwards-pointing arrows are "expand this thread" or "collapse this thread" button. I'm not sure why you're unable to activate them. As suggested before, switch to "Desktop mode" and life on a mobile gets easier. (Tiny link at the very, very bottom of each page). Regards,

12411:. This database contains information about all queries that are being run and starred by users in Quarry. This information was already public through the web interface, but you can now query it using SQL. You can read more about that, and 20 other community-submitted tasks that were 8796:

system, there is a feature that shows potentially-outdated translations with a pink background until they are updated or confirmed. From this week, confirming translations will be logged, and there is a new user-right that can be required for confirming translations if the community

634: 12370:

is a feature that encourages editors to add a citation when they add a new paragraph to a Knowledge article. For a short time, the corresponding tag "Edit Check (references) activated" was erroneously being applied to some edits outside of the main namespace. This has been fixed.

11206:

if it is to be accepted. Knowledge can take a while to master, with lots of policies and guidelines to follow. So, we always suggest users gain general editing experience for a few weeks or months before embarking on the hardest of all tasks here - creating a new article from the

7662:

falls way outside what's acceptable for an encyclopaedia, so please don't try that again as that's not what Knowledge is for. I think someone has already explained that article talk pages are about discussing ways of improving an article, not just random observations or unrelated

1665:

Even then, you cannot just add stuff that you happen to know - everything must be verifiable by anyone in the world. So you must cite reliably-published, independent sources - at least one per paragraph - that anyone with access to a library, bookshop or internet could check. See

6421: 4968:

Your deleted contributions suggests to me that you are, and yet you have not declared any connection to these companies you are trying to promote here. Our policy is that undeclared paid editing is not permitted, and editing rights may be withdrawn until clarity is provided. You

2557:

will use this account, as an administrator here, I will have to remove your account's editing privileges and force each person to make their own account. We don't object to collaboration - just not account sharing. If you're all connected, each person also needs to declare their

8333:

When you visit a wiki where you don't yet have a local account, local rules such as edit filters can sometimes prevent your account from being created. Starting this week, MediaWiki takes your global rights into account when evaluating whether you can override such local rules.

6235:

You are right. But the user appears to have a very rudimentary command of English. It should really only be the Review Decline notice that needs to be left in place for the duration of the block. But I wanted to keep it extremely simple for them to understand, as they ignored

11596:

editorial control of its content. We never accept personal websites as sources, because people are free to make whatever unsubstantiated claims they like and present them as fact. It's not personal - just a way of ensuring accuracy in everything we present here. Best wishes,

5617:

that you should read. There would need to be detailed, in-depth, and independent coverage of the business/website - not advertising copy. Perhaps you could supply me with links to the best three sources that you would consider using. I can give you feedback on them if they're

11528: 3604:. Creating a new page is an extremely hard task - especially for a brand new editor like yourself. It's always best to learn a biut more about Knowledge by making small improvements to existing articles first. Maybe fix grammar and spelling, add the odd citation or wikilink. 2326:

But even then, it would not be for you to write about yourself! We expect unconnected people to find detailed independent sources that talk about you to create those pages. Someone writing about themselves is never going to be neutral on the topic, and therefore has a huge

2026:

So, my answer is to use one of careful judgement. Is the link to the non-existent page likely to be notable? Can you find online sources that mention it? If so, leave it in place. If you genuinely think it's a pointless redlink, then remove the link and add an explanatory

9298:

We may point users to various guidance, help or policy pages, and we expect they will take the time to read and understand these. So, I'll leave leave you a welcome message on your talk page with a number of important links. But you may also like to visit this help page:

2553:. You may not share or give access to your account to other people. Each person who edits Knowledge MUST have their own account. If you cannot assure me that you will immediately change your password to this account and not share it, and that from this point forward only 484:. Thanks for your question. It's a very sensible thing to start slowly on Knowledge - often by making small edits at first to familiarise yourself with the process. Have you seen your 'Homepage' Tab, which offers you a range of easy editing suggestions to get you started? 2861:

After that, you may add a very brief mention of you and your interests in editing Knowledge by creating you Userpage. But don’t mention or link to your business website as this would be deemed promotional, and render it liable to deletion. We do not allow LinkedIn-style

1852:

that are independent of the subject you're writing about. Thus, we do not accept sources such as personal blogs, social media accounts, personal websites etc. I hope this helps. I'll leave a welcome message with a couple of useful links on your talk page. Best wishes,

1007:

that every single thing that anyone saves (even to their own user page) is literally 'published' online, and potentially viewable by anyone, anywhere. That applies whether it's edits to a draft, this talk page of mine, or edits to an already published article, such as

7743:

Now, you can go about addressing this on fr.wiki in one or more ways. Firstly, it's quite possible that the editor {{User:Ariel Provost]] leaving you the warning did not see your response as you did not directly 'ping' them. I assume French wiki has the equivalent of

4215:, then there cannot be an article about that business, and you would be wasting your time trying. Press releases, company websites and insider business newsletters are not counted, whereas mainstream national media and properly published books are acceptable sources. 2618:

There is no shortcut to creating a new article. You must be willing to follow and spend time to read the links I’ve provided in my answers above. But you could look at existing articles about other notable judges to appreciate what a biographical article should look

1748:

put that mop to good use. I still feel I've an awful lot to learn about being an admin, and find it much harder now to ask simple questions (as I feel I should somehow already know the answers). I hope you feel really proud - you certainly should be! Happy New Year!

487:

The most important thing to say is that everything you add to Knowledge must be derived from properly published sources (books, journals, mainstream newspapers etc), and nothing should come from your own personal knowledge. By all means use that knowledge to unearth

7840:

from French into English? Because this is English Knowledge we do really expect all content to be in English. I assume it would be fine to have what your wrote about your first experience of an Editathon on your user page on French Knowledge, too, though. Regards,

7796:. So now, DocLara, you know which are the many appropriate places where to discuss this matter. In fact, this complain placed here seems to me very unusual. So I'd rather not comment any more. See you on french pages, with appropriate pings. Cordialement, et Hop ! 2588:

Apologies, the rule breaking was not intentional, there was just a lot of info at once. Can you please send step by step instructions on what I should do next to start the Judge John J. Merrick page to honor the first Judge of Malibu. I really appreciate the help!

609:

Hi Nick! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. Your work welcoming newcomers at the Teahouse is always invaluable. Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Knowledge

12491:(45 mins) - 19 short presentations by some of the Hackathon participants, describing some of the projects they worked on, such as automated testing of maintenance scripts, a video-cutting command line tool, and interface improvements for various tools. There are 9343:, meaning it has been reviewed, refined and regarded as pretty high quality for our encyclopaedia. That doesn't mean we don't welcome ways to improve it further. But making suggestions for changes are best discussed first on the talk page of the article (i.e. at 5542:

My apologies, I meant to say vernacular name. I believe that both scientific names and common names should be mentioned in the articles since some names (Iranian leopard, Turkish leopard) are occasionally used by some sources (such sources are even listed in the

6910:. Now that you’ve found some, you can choose to use either of our two editing tools to add citations. Each works slightly differently, butvyou can easily switch back and forth between them. So here are two shortcut links to instructions for adding references: 2494:

and pasting it on Knowledge and releasing it as if the words were your own. I have no idea why you thought the text on its own would make an encylopaedia entry, but now I am going to have to delete it for copyright violation and warn you not to do that again,

10552: 2014:

Good question! Had you asked about a dead link in a citation to an external site, I would have advised against removing it. That's because, usually, it's a case that the url has been modified by the target website, and it can easily be re-found with a bit of

1912:

If you need further help, let me know the article and the type of info and sources that you'd like to use. I'm no expert on music articles, but I can give you a good steer as to what's the best approach to take with the edits you'd like to see made. Regards,

1546:

that allow anyone in the world to verify whatever factual statement you have added. It's no reflection on any individual, but we never trust stuff that someone happens to know - even if they are the subject of an article themselves. Hope this helps. Regards,

9153: 12145:. Thanks you for asking for support. Unfortunately, I don't really take on very new users like yourself, as I prefer to see evidence of a long-term commitment to editing before I invest the time to support people on a one to one basis, and you've only made 10284:

to get information about IP addresses. This tool is available as a Beta Feature in your preferences. The tool was not available for a few days last week, but is now working again. Thank you to Shizhao for filing the bug report. You can read about that, and

7731:

My concerns over the original statement you removed would have been that there was statement taken as a direct quote from the source, and little understanding imparted by the numbers at the end of the sentence. There were how many qualified mathematicians

5923: 1908:

based on the source zzzzz that you must also supply with your edit request. This will draw the attention of an editor who will assesss and make/reject the edit request, as necessary. Unsusbtantiated statements will not be added, unless they're very minor

6762:

Do remember to preview any edits you make before you publish them, or maybe even try adding a citation on a less well-monitored page, or perhaps even in your sandbox. But it sounds like you may have a good source for whatever you want to add. Good luck.

2524:

Nick I'm so sorry, my assistants were helping me and they were rushing and wanted to get the process started and were going to edit and revise once the page got approved. We know now that we can not copy content from articles. We will write all original

6077:. Once you enable it, your in-progress edits will be stored in your web browser, and if you accidentally close an editing window or your browser or computer crashes, you will be prompted to recover the unpublished text. Please leave any feedback on the 9987:. The Community Wishlist is Wikimedia’s forum for volunteers to share ideas (called wishes) to improve how the wikis work. The new version of the wishlist is always open, works with both wikitext and Visual Editor, and allows wishes in any language. 6370:

their editing. I tend to find poor editing comes to my attention in one place that I especially care about, but that I when I investigate their other edits I often then find a pattern of edits that are (shall we say...) not as good as they ought to

1643:, which was 'soft-blocked' as a promotional and corporate username, which could theoretically be used by any member of staff. Both are against our rules. So you then, as is permitted, created your new account that you're now using. Is that correct?. 5792: 8461:

Next week, on wikis with the Vector 2022 skin as the default, logged-out desktop users will be able to choose between different font sizes. The default font size will also be increased for them. This is to make Wikimedia projects easier to read.

5601:

As you are intimately connected with the company, you have what we call a ], so should not really be the person trying to create this article. If you were to try, you would need to make an obligatory declaration on your userpage. Instructions at

4789:

user right were reserved for an experiment in 2015, but were never used. These were visible on Special:Search and Special:ListGroupRights. The unused namespaces and user rights are now removed. No pages are moved, and no changes need to be made.

4312:. It’s not like LinkedIn, which lets anyone create a profile page about themselves. In essence, we need evidence that the world at large has taken notice of you. Our Notability Criteria have to be met before a page about someone is accepted. See 7136:

Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Knowledge. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks.

3306:

that you prepare a Draft article and work on it until it is in good shape before submitting it. It's not an easy task for a new editor to get everything right, and creating a new article from scratch is the hardest task anyone can do here. See

9291:, and everything said here must be based on already published, high quality sources. So no personal opinions, personal blogs or social media acocunts, or stuff that you simply happen to know. Everything here that could be challenged must be 6684:

number appearing inline within the article text. Both of our editing tools also let you reuse the same citation more than once within an article, yet the entry for that citation is only shown once in the Reference section. Clever stuff! See

2043:

If you'd care to link to the page you're talking about, I can give you a more considered opinion. It's good to ask questions like this when starting out - that way you get to know how the process of improving Knowledge pages works. Regards,

11980: 3315:

for a Wizard tool that helps you prepare a draft article for review. If you put a poor article directly into the encyclopaedia, it stands a very good chance of being immediately deleted if it doesn't meet our basic article requirements of

12376:

It is now possible for a wiki community to change the order in which a page’s categories are displayed on their wiki. By default, categories are displayed in the order they appear in the wikitext. Now, wikis with a consensus to do so can

11131:

instead. Your community should check if any pages are listed there, and move them to the correct titles, or delete them if they are no longer needed. A full log (including pages for which appropriate names could be found) is available in

3472:

It is advisable for all newcomers to spend time learning the basics of editing before rushing in to try to create a new article. It’s the hardest task anyone can perform here, and few new editors are successful first time. But please see

2506:. I earnestly recommend you spend some time learning how to make minor edits and improvements to Knowledge before ever attempting anything like creating a new article.I'm afraid you've really exceeded my driving metaphor by both crashing 11845:

I have given you a 'soft block' and a chance to create a new account which does not advertise your website or organisation. Note that if you are here purely to promote your website, you will be permanently blocked from editing. Regards,

9869: 9713:

with as little disruption to tools and workflows as possible. Volunteer developers, including gadget and user-script maintainers, are kindly asked to update the code of their tools and features to handle temporary accounts. The team has

8868:

Last week, styling updates were made to the Vector 2022 skin. This caused unforeseen issues with templates, hatnotes, and images. Changes to templates and hatnotes were reverted. Most issues with images were fixed. If you still see any,

7716:

to raise your concerns on the article's Talk Page. Here you can expand your concerns about the statement, suggest better wording, and suggest alternative or additional citations especially if they provide a counter view of the statement.

852:

The lead paragraph should clearly state why he is notable. i.e. not just that he is a professional badminton player, but what his biggest achievement is. That way he can quickly be assessed for 'notability' against the sports notability

9719: 6163:

Thank you for your question. I see your draft is currently in the review process for a second time, so there is nothing I need to do in that regard other than let our volunteers do their work in reviewing articles. This can take 2 or 3

10212:

Nor are either of our books ever going to have Knowledge articles written about them until the same criteria are met. i.e. when the world at large, via mainstream sources, takes notice of them (and not just a short entry on GoodReads,

4876:, it’s only possible to create an article if you can base it on the content of independent, published sources. That means books, magazine articles, newspapers or quality news websites. Can you find these? Anything else would be purely 10237:

do get mainstream cover in the media, do pop back and ask again as we might then be able to guide you further. In the meantime, you might want to think about building your own website about yourself on another platform. Kind regards,

10035:

Because you have not yet edited from this account, there is no point asking an administrator to change your account name. So, simply abandon this account, don’t use it again, and just create a new one with the name you want. Regards,

9828:, both desktop and mobile, for logged-in and logged-out users. Interface admins and user script maintainers are encouraged to check gadgets and user scripts in the dark mode, to find any hard-coded colors and fix them. There are some 9785: 6470: 6362:

Asking a user politely on their talk page is a good, non-inflammatory way of engaging with concerns. Asking them to leave better edit summaries may also be worthwhile, as this helps others to understand the reasoning behind a content

3619:

for the important way of handling factual statements about living or recently deceased people. If you can't find independent sources that talk about this person in some detail, then you are stuck, and there can't be an article about

2569:

The process for creating and developing any article about a notable person (as Knowledge defines it) doesn't need to be rushed, and just results in rejection. Please read and follow the learning guide I left on your talk page and see

6514:

about creating your first article. It is always best to spend time learning how Knowledge works by making many smaller edits to existing articles than rushing in trying to create a new page straight away. I hope this helps. Regards,

7828:

Oh, @Kikuyu3, I should add that the question came about as a result of our Mentorship program, in which every editor on en.wiki is assigned an experienced editor to whom they can directly ask questions and seek advice. That was the

5384: 3425:

I’ve left you a welcome message on your talk page, with a link to our Getting Started tutorial. Don’t be too ambitious to start with; just find articles (maybe about your home area) and look for typos, poor English etc that you can

2382: 1518:

The history of that page shows that you did not create it. And, because many others have since edited it, it is now too late to request deletion of the page even if you had created it. If you believe the subject is not notable (see

5493:

publication if it's not actually used anywhere else. (I think, from memory, the example of "Eurasian marten" might be one such) Equally, we don't want unnecessary sections listing non-English names, either. Hope this helps a bit.

9165:, thanks to a combined effort across Foundation teams. This allows Wikimedians using multiple wikis to set up a consistent reading experience easily, for example by switching between light and dark mode only once for all wikis. 3206:. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found 11519: 7182: 2036:

is an example of a section I wrote some while ago. It contains many redlinks to plant names, every one of which deserves an article here, but as yet they don't exist. Meanwhile, many do exist in other language versions of this

9825: 8463: 7515:

In the Vector 2022 skin, main pages will be displayed at full width (like special pages). The goal is to keep the number of characters per line large enough. This is related to the coming changes to typography in Vector 2022.

4040:

Newly auto-created accounts (the accounts you get when you visit a new wiki) now have the same local notification preferences as users who freshly register on that wiki. It is effected in four notification types listed in the

2031:

to justify your change. The clue is often that there are lots of redlinks in one article to people who played a very minor role in something, and the article creators is trying to push their importance more than is justified.

6666:. You can choose either of our two editing tools to add citations. Each works slightly differently, and you can easily switch back and forth between them. So here are two shortcut links to instructions for adding references: 6613:

I assume you created these little videos yourself as a bit of fun? Be aware that whenever an editor tries to write about something they are connected with, they need to declare a 'conflict of interest' before proceeding. See

5698:. You can choose either of our two editing tools to add citations. Each works slightly differently, and you can easily switch back and forth between them. So here are two shortcut links to instructions for adding references: 4018:

If you have the "Email me when a page or a file on my watchlist is changed" option enabled, edits by bot accounts no longer trigger notification emails. Previously, only minor edits would not trigger the notification emails.

309:

I hope this explains things. Bottom line: don't take this issue to heart. Knowledge can seem like a harsh environment for new editors. My view is that new users are best advised to stay away from contentious areas like using

10566: 4656: 6460:

This is the last warning that by the end of May 2024 the Vector 2022 skin will no longer share site and user scripts/styles with old Vector. For user-scripts that you want to keep using on Vector 2022, copy the contents of

4032:

as the default skin, Wikivoyage, and Wikibooks. Other wikis will be affected over the course of the next three months. Gadgets are not impacted. If you have been affected or want to minimize the impact on your project, see

2483:. It looks more like a footnote on page 16 of a local history newsletter. It doesn't even start (as all encyclopaedia entries should) by saying John Merrick was a ...., and then continuing to tell us about why he meets our 1596:

Something went wrong The page title "File:IMG-20240104-WA0001.jpg" is restricted from editing or creation because it matches the following entry on the local or global blacklist: File:IMG-\d{8}-WA\d{4}.jpg # WhatsApp, e.g.

9829: 9170:

If you use a very old web browser some features might not work on the Wikimedia wikis. This affects Internet Explorer 11 and versions of Chrome, Firefox and Safari older than 2016. This change makes it possible to use new

4132:

Does this business meet our Notability Criteria for companies? It would need to have been written about in detail and in depth by at least three independent sources, such as books, magazines our mainstream newspapers. See

10485:

from the "what links here" database. Editors at any wiki that use these templates, can help by replacing the templates with these new functions. The templates at Commons will be updated during the Hackathon at Wikimania.

6060:

which you can use to see if an online statement is supported by a Knowledge article. This is a small experiment to see if Knowledge can be used this way. Because it is a small experiment, it can only be used in Chrome in

3676: 7178: 3555:) before an admin like me comes along and 'soft-blocks your account, which will simply force your hand. If that happens, please don't take it personally, but it is a policy that we need to avoid confusing usernames. see 2974:

If you’re viewing Knowledge in ‘Mobile view’, just look for the dark sloping pencil icon to start editing either a whole page or a section within it. (You can tell if you’re in mobile view if the url contains .m. -as in

10973:

Hey - that's absolutely brilliant news. Congratulations. You've come such a long way. (Oh, and btw I never acknowledged the link you sent me about your employment. I won't mention it here, but that sounds awesome, too.

1542:., as you evidently have a conflict of interest. In future, please do not add 'facts' that the subject of an article has told you are true. This is not how we work. You must provide citations to independently published 11566:. I can find no Knowledge article that has been deleted after a deletion discussion that contains the word 'Killer' and that is linked to darts. (Only Killer the card game which was deleted as non-notable back in 2011) 2565:

I feel I need to ask: who is we? Who are these assistants who are trying to get this article created, and why the unseemly rush? Please reinsert the COI notice that you put on your account's userpage and subsequently

2111:

Because of the two previous, failed nominations, I'd suggest you get the article to a point when you're really happy with, and have exhausted all improvements you think you can make, and and seek input from editors at

11704: 11638: 4140:

bear in mind that Knowledge is not here to help you promote your business. If the world at large hasn’t taken notice of this business then, along with millions of others, it will not deserve its own article. Regards,

12344: 9332:. Thanks for your question, and welcome to Knowledge. Oh dear: I fear I'm the very worst mentor to ask on this topic, as I've not done that sort of maths for 50 years! I simply can't comment on what makes most sense. 7116: 1322: 857:

should be supported by a reference - it doesn't matter if you use the same source more than once, or if it is not in English. I see you've used Visual Editor, so please follow the guidance pages that you can find at

11692:

Thank You for your time. I guess You are right- my comment on ref list did not have the form or tone it supposed to have : " Who invented Killer? Read more: www.routing.se I seems I need some other source to quote

4258: 12273: 1974:, then add an inline citation at the end of the factual statement (sentence or paragraph). Simply adding things you know is not the way we work, as we need anyone with access to a library or bookshop to be able to 12608: 9970:

Wikimedia contributors and GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives, and museums) organisations can now learn and measure the impact Wikimedia Commons is having towards creating quality encyclopedic content using the

8780:

wrapper for both named and unnamed references for better compatibility with the legacy parser. Interface administrators should verify that gadgets that interact with citations are compatible with the new markup.

1981:

I have left a welcome message for you on your talk page, with a link to getting started. It can be quite a learning curve to begin with, so make small changes and then save (=publish) them before making further

7507:

results page will now use CSS flex attributes, for better accessibility, instead of a table. If you have a gadget or script that adjusts search results, you should update your script to the new HTML structure.

6078: 5927: 3697:

Anyway, I will give you two links on how to do this, depending on which of our two editing tools you’ve opted to use. (But you can easily switch back and forth between them by clicking the dark, slanted pencil

2304:, it cannot be used for promoting personal biographies. I'm afarid you may have a misconception about how things work here. Sites like LinkedIn, Facebook and other social media platforms are available for that. 11573:, or do you know the IP address that you were using at the time? If you're prepared to let me know that, I can check for all contributions made by it, whether or not they've subsequently been deleted, and why. 878:

Finally - and most importantly - at the moment, your article is just a draft in your sandbox. There it will remain, unseen and unassessed unless you submit it for review for inclusion in the main body of our

10341: 7124: 12587:

Hello. Sorry, but your question is not appropriate to Knowledge or related to the support mentors can give new editors. If you need to know about the practicalities of editing Knowledge articles, ask away!

3207: 2418:

I should say that for a complete beginner to create a brand new page is very difficult - a bit like driving up the motorway at full speed the very first time you get behind the wheel of a car. It's easy to

10327: 7766:, ensuring your edit summary clearly referred to the talk page discussion you had earlier posted. Something like "Rewording paragraph per tlak page discussion which elicited no response (or per consensus)" 6480: 1002:

Once you have completed all your edits, and saved them (i.e. publish changes), then you will still see the blue "Submit the draft for review" button again. Only when you click that will your submission be

12248:

will receive new colors that make them compatible in dark mode. This is the first of many changes to come as part of a major upgrade to syntax highlighting. You can learn more about what's to come on the

10817:

in months. I just came back, and I just recollected all the nostalgic (and rather humourous for me in present day) times I contributed here. I encourage users to reply only at their most leisure. Cheers!

9958:. This feature is used when a contributor wishes to stop editing forever. It helps you hide your past association and edit to protect your privacy. Once processed, the account will be locked and renamed. 8908:. This feature is intended to help newcomers and to assist edit-patrollers by inviting people who are adding new content to a Knowledge article to add a citation when they do not do so themselves. During 5715:

I hope this helps. Do let me know if you need any further support! I will also leave a welcome message on your talk page with a useful link to follow to getting started with editing. Regards from the UK,

12488: 12010: 10521:

Editors who help to organize WikiProjects and similar on-wiki collaborations, are invited to share ideas and examples of successful collaborations with the Campaigns and Programs teams. You can fill out

7912:. I'm very happy to hear from you, but it will be a while before I can reply. I have easily a week's worth of messages and commitments I need to catch up on right now. Please bear with me. Best wishes, 7127:(2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the 6709:

Thank you Nick. I would like to use the official Coroner's Report and one of the online newspapers which has a picture of most of the first page of the report so I should be able to use the citation on

6529:

I find everything to be struggling at this point, and if you wanna know this source, It's ONLY on YouTube. I know It may be some kind of un-scorce, but this little, big franchise could work someday. :)

6240:'s more detailed - and correct - advice. The link you provided above is certainly correct, and a useful reminder for me, too. I appreciate you taking the time and trouble to question my notice. Cheers, 5228:

All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on March 20. This is planned at 14:00 UTC. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming weeks.

4824:

495:

After a while, you may feel more confident at starting a new page about a person. But, once again, make sure you base everything off good sources. This lets anyone in the world with access to a library

12498: 12120:

I think you made were acceptable, but beware not falling into the trap of extending or expanding plot summaries into long-winded, rambling accounts full of trivial detail. I hope this helps. Regards,

11097: 11012:

my own daughter starts her year of teaching English in Tokyo today. All very exciting times for you youngsters! Looking forward to hearing how things are going once you hit the high seas. Best wishes,

10870: 11039: 9688: 7468: 4841: 2214: 2209:

which expects the editor proposing deletion to have tried to find sources that can be used to improve an article. There's little on a general or 'news' search on Google, but Google Books came up with

10334: 4279:

I noticed on the page you mentioned a whole section of unsourced biographical information about his early life. Finding published evidence to support these statements would be very helpful. Regards,

4196:

Secondly, Knowledge is an encyclopaedia of notable things, not a place to promote one's favourite local business (of which there are millions around the planet, very few of which are 'notable'). See

3496: 2210: 1763: 5022:

As you seem to be writing a string of rapidly-deleted articles about businesses, I must ask you once again to state categorically whether or not you are being paid to create them? If so, please see

500:

what it is that you've added. I'd encourage you to work on any female physicists, as there is a bias towards male biographies here. We even have a project to encourage more pages about women - see

11993: 9993:

MediaWiki software so that contributors in our movement who translate pages and strings can translate them and have the sites in all languages. Read more about the team and their upcoming work on

6991:

about yourself, your experience and interests in editing Knowledge. Anything else is not appropriate. You may use LinkedIn to promote yourself, but not Knowledge. More information can be found at

5282:

on your userpage. You are also advised to learn the basics of editing existing articles before rushing in with the incredibly difficult task of creating a brand new article as a complete newcomer.

3164:, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas. 3238: 3224: 2876:

needs every episode listing. Just stating there were 47 episodes and giving a link or citation to where those titles can be found is the right approach. The article also needs better citation to

11802:

Finally, it is not easy to create an encyclopaedia article here with no previous editing experience. So we advise new editors spend time learning how to edit and improve existing articles first.

3168: 7762:

well-written alternative text. Gaining consensus can take a few weeks. On en.wiki it might be OK if your concerns gained no response to then make the edit your proposed after about 10 days per

2158: 11157: 9967:

highlights some of the new capabilities of the feature, including swiping through a feed of recent changes and a personal library of user talk messages for use when patrolling from your phone.

9781: 9149: 6939:

Both of our editing tools also let you reuse the same citation more than once within an article, yet the entry for that citation is only shown once in the Reference section. Clever stuff! See

6822:

On another matter, on the WikiAlpha page there is something on my daughter's death, but the title is Laura Vanessa Sykes. How can I change it to her correct name which is Laura Vanessa Nunes?

7344:

has added article body sections in JSON format and a curated short description field to the existing parsed Infobox. This expansion to the API is also available via Wikimedia Cloud Services.

650: 7238:

I recognize that the last several questions I've asked you are variants of the same thing— I just don't feel experienced enough to escalate an issue without checking with someone else first

7069: 7054: 3949:

single edit we make here is viewable online, so that's why it's called 'Publish, but that's not the same as actually publishing an encyclopaedia article into the main part of Knowledge. See

12053: 11476:(also known as "Pending Changes") may notice that the indicators at the top of articles have changed. This change makes the system more consistent with the rest of the MediaWiki interface. 11277: 6969: 12470: 6355:

talk page for blanking, and take a look at any past warnings. Although that's permitted, it does indicate to me the level of problems they might be causing, and my response to them. I use

3741:

is working and loaded onto 3 test servers. The team in charge is testing the split's impact and requires feedback from WDQS users through the UI or programmatically in different channels.

3645:- so please see that link for details how to do this. We don't mind anyone having a COI, but we do need openness so that we are aware of it. Undeclared paid editing is not allowed, so see 3429:

On your Userpage, you are permitted to say a few words about yourself and your interest in editing Knowledge. But we don’t allow people to promote themselves by creating detailed profiles.

8274:

Some CSS in the Minerva skin has been removed to enable easier community configuration. Interface editors should check the rendering on mobile devices for aspects related to the classes:

6254:

Okay, whew, thank you! I was worried I'd gotten mixed up. Agreed that keeping it simple in that case is better, and thank you for helping me check my assumptions; I really appreciate it!

7517: 3217:. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. 11169:

were awarded at Wikimania, in seven categories. For example, one award went to the ISA Tool, used for adding structured data to files on Commons, which was recently improved during the

9387:

This procedure is now way too cumbersome for me. If others want to follow-up with this suggestion however they wish, that's fine with me. They certainly do not need to mention my name.

7147: 5818: 4845: 4068:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 20 February. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 21 February. It will be on all wikis from 22 February (

3775:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 February. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 February. It will be on all wikis from 15 February (

1354: 582: 448:

No worries. I'm here if I can help you. But if I don't reply in good time, do feel free to ask anything at our help forum for new editors. It's called the Teahouse, and you can find it

12617:

I really don’t have a clue what you’re getting at, nor do I have the time or inclination to seek clarification. Talk pages are for matters relating to improving Knowledge. End of. See

11666:). I've searched the edit history of the Darts article for any sign of the addition of your personal website, and could find nothing. So, I'm at a loss to identify the particular edit. 10580: 8961:

The text colors that are used for visited-links, hovered-links, and active-links, were also slightly changed last week to improve their accessibility in both light mode and dark mode.

8815:

People who attempt to add an external link in the visual editor will now receive immediate feedback if they attempt to link to a domain that a project has decided to block. Please see

7120: 6473:

available. Interface administrators who foresee this leading to lots of technical support questions may wish to send a mass message to your community, as was done on French Knowledge.

5528:

What do you mean a "binomial name section"? Are you referring to synonyms of scientific names? If so, these are best included in the species infobox. Any reason why they shouldn't be?

12508: 9871: 2426:

about creating your first article. I'll also leave a welcome message on your talk page with links you should work through to learn how the editing process works. Regards from the UK,

12501:(40 mins) - a roundtable discussion for tool-maintainers, users, and supporters of Toolforge about how to make the platform sustainable and how to evaluate the tools available there. 11461: 9927: 9843: 9710: 3957:

Because this is English Knowledge, you cannot create articles or communicate in any other language than English. But your account will also work when you go to Telugu Knowledge. See

2865:

I can see why you wanted to remove the wikilink that implied you were a convicted necrophile! That’s fine. We expect factual statements to be properly cited to reliable sources (see

455:

I'll leave you some helpful links on your talk page, too. Good luck getting started. This encyclopaedia needs all the helpful input and good sources it can get. Regards from the UK,

11487:

experience problems with the buttons adding content into the edit-summary instead of the edit-window. You can read more about that, and 26 other community-submitted tasks that were

4675: 4662: 3667: 12457:

The previous switchover took 3 minutes, and the Site Reliability Engineering teams use many tools to make sure that this essential maintenance work happens as quickly as possible.

12347:, and share your feedback on the talkpage. This input helps the Community Tech team to decide the right technical approach to build. Everyone is also encouraged to continue adding 11143:

to newcomers on their wiki are once again able to access lists of potential mentees who they can connect with to offer help and guidance. This functionality was restored thanks to

9792: 8832:. This extension allows communities to customize specific features to meet their local needs. Currently only Growth features are configurable, but the extension will support other 6498:

Hi Tim, and thanks for your question. Unfortunately, that's not how Knowledge operates. It isn't here to help things get well-known; it's only interested in covering subjects that

6366:

It's your choice whether you concern yourself only with articles you're directly interested in, or whether you worry more about ensuring an editor follow Knowledge's norms across a

4090:

as we prepare to shut down the grid on March 14th, 2024. The tool's code and data have not been deleted. If you are a maintainer and you want your tool re-enabled reach out to the

2668: 5672: 5583:

I'm just about to head out to listen to a talk about using insects to determine the time of death of murder suspects (!). I'll probably have to answer you tomorrow, now. Cheers,

9681: 9186:. Community Configuration was created to allow communities to customize how some features work, because each language wiki has unique needs. At the moment, admins can configure 9005: 7170: 6317: 3938: 3218: 2408:

criteria? Anything you write must be based of properly published sources, not personal knowledge, private websites etc. So newspapers, books, magazines, TV documentaries are OK.

882:

I will shortly move the page into a 'Draft' and will add a big blue 'submit' button which you can hit when you've addressed the points I've raised above. Our review process at

298: 11781:. What is the company, and are you connected with it in any way? All businesses must be ‘Notable’ by Knowledge’s definition. You can read the notability criteria for companies 11177: 10559: 9692: 9152:, and improves low-contrast reading and usage in low-light settings. As part of these changes, dark mode will also work on User-pages and Portals. There is more information in 6447:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 April. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 April. It will be on all wikis from 25 April (

5440:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 March. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 March. It will be on all wikis from 21 March (

5188:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 March. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 March. It will be on all wikis from 14 March (

11047: 6386:

needed'); revert and warn them about leaving commentaries in articles; warn and report for vandalism, or collate evidence of bad edits and eventually you could report them to

6127:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 April. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 April. It will be on all wikis from 11 April (

1598: 273:

It's more the case that you're welcome to just drop by with any question about how to edit. I'll help you if I can. If I'm not around, you're also welcome to seek help at the

10009: 9715: 8262:

API was added to allow gadgets to create new portlets (menus) in the skin. In certain skins this can be used to create dropdowns. Gadget developers are invited to try it and

2636:

Ok no problem, I will take the time to do it properly. I just changed the password in settings although I'm not sure if it went through, but I will make sure not to share it.

12099: 11700: 11634: 11185: 8992:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 June. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 June. It will be on all wikis from 27 June (

8889:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 June. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 June. It will be on all wikis from 20 June (

8754:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 June. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 June. It will be on all wikis from 13 June (

5909:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 April. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 April. It will be on all wikis from 4 April (

4811:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 March. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 March. It will be on all wikis from 7 March (

3669: 2401: 1640: 1465:

Fine. It's a small, but importna t matter, but they will need to create their own account and upload it themselves. Your account is not in a position to release an image of

55: 11976: 10618:

to be truly notable by Knowledge's standards, someone will inevitably wish to write about you. Please leave that task to them, and not try to do it yourself. Kind regards,

9204: 5275:

Everything must be written in your own words (not copy pasted), and must be neutral in tone. This is an encyclopedia, after all, not a promotional website for people's CVs.

12485:

To learn more about the technology behind the Wikimedia projects, you can now watch sessions from the technology track at Wikimania 2024 on Commons. This week, check out:

11525:

To learn more about the technology behind the Wikimedia projects, you can now watch sessions from the technology track at Wikimania 2024 on Commons. This week, check out:

10733: 10032: 10023: 10021: 7633: 7471:" feature has been removed. It was created in 2017 to show people with older accounts how the interface had changed, and has now been seen by most of the intended people. 2960: 2836: 2286: 868:

to another Knowledge page, and add a citation at the end of the sentence that allows anyone to verify the statement you have added. If it can't be verified - don't add it!

12378: 11043: 8798: 8601: 8448:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 June. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 June. It will be on all wikis from 6 June (

8322:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 May. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 May. It will be on all wikis from 30 May (

8033:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 May. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 May. It will be on all wikis from 23 May (

7487:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 May. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 May. It will be on all wikis from 16 May (

5890: 3161: 12604: 11196: 11187: 10846: 5319: 3940: 2354: 1868: 1504: 1267: 7328: 6413: 5417: 4442: 4432: 4417: 1087: 11824: 9178: 9148:

Over the next three weeks, dark mode will become available for all users, both logged-in and logged-out, starting with the mobile web version. This fulfils one of the

7792:. First, many thanks to you, Nick, for your ping, and very clear and wise comments. @DocLara, I assume you are complaining about my revert of your removal on the page 7360:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 May. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 May. It will be on all wikis from 9 May (

5333:

You can choose either of our two editing tools to add citations. Each works slightly differently. So here are two shortcut links to instructions for adding references:

5330: 5321: 3064: 3059: 1334: 5926:

for the Product and Technology department. They are suggestions for what results the Foundation wants from big technical changes from July 2024 to June 2025. You can

3143: 12110: 12101: 9861: 9846:

feature on testwiki. Temporary accounts is a feature that will help improve privacy on the wikis. No further temporary account deployments are scheduled yet. Please

7044: 7039: 5771: 5766: 3794:

tools on the grid engine will be stopped starting on February 14th, 2024. If you have tools actively migrating you can ask for an extension so they are not stopped.

2971: 2962: 2847: 2838: 2297: 2288: 1879: 1870: 1778: 1765: 1622: 1515: 1506: 11940: 11788:

We are not here to help people promote their business, so meeting notability criteria is absolutely essential, or you will be wasting your time and ours if you try.

10729: 10659: 9964: 9521: 9506: 9501: 9496: 4358:. . . and if you ever use offensive words, slang or acronyms against other editors again, you could find yourself being blocked from editing! You have been warned! 4185:. Paid editors are not permitted to take payment without making such a statement, or their editing rights will be withdrawn. Even if not paid, you may still have a 12573: 12043: 12017: 11244: 8502: 8497: 7301: 5546:

Also, I used the name "European marten", not "Eurasian marten". But I understand that the European pine marten page will not have its common name changed for now.

4294: 4273: 4260: 3447: 3411: 11173:. You can see video demonstrations of each tool at the awards page. Congratulations to this year's recipients, and thank you to all tool creators and maintainers. 1607:

Any administrator can create or move this page for you. If the page you tried to edit or create is not a talk page, suggest your changes at its talk page and add

1139: 1129: 12407:

user, but they are now more broadly accessible, as Quarry can be accessed by anyone with a Wikimedia account. In addition, Quarry's internal database can now be

10905: 9797: 8593: 7102: 7090: 6390:

for others to look into their editing. But engaging in a friendly way first is always a very mature approach. I hope this waffly answer is of some use. Regards,

4671: 4658: 2160: 2059: 2000: 10281: 9674: 9009: 8969: 8825: 3125: 2105:

earlier today. I'm sure they'd appreciate knowing what you're doing. You could add a link to the talk page discussion by posting a further request for input at

11552: 8554: 5470:

I just want to check with you because another wikipedian suggested that I could name a common name section in the article, if you get this please let me know.

4591: 4091: 3978: 2906: 1611: 1562: 1344: 1082: 10303: 9700:

A problem with the color of the talkpage tabs always showing as blue, even for non-existent pages which should have been red, affecting the Vector 2022 skin,

8976:

did not always work when the topic title was very long and the link was used as a wikitext link. This has been fixed. Thanks to Lofhi for submitting the bug.

7371:

When you look at the Special:Log page, the first view is labelled "All public logs", but it only shows some logs. This label will now say "Main public logs".

5387:

displays data from Spur, an IP addresses database. Previously, the only data source for this feature was MaxMind. Now, IP info is more useful for patrollers.

5221:

hidden even if information has indeed been entered. If you accidentally close the page before saving the structured data you entered, that data will be lost.

12408: 12225: 11997: 11738: 10907: 10874: 9480: 9431: 9284: 9275: 8563: 8530: 6646: 4118: 3601: 3458: 3449: 3422: 3413: 3395: 3053: 2170: 925:

disappears. I tried clicking on "Publish the changes", but I am not sure if the draft is now waiting to to be reviewed or not. Can you please help me again?

333: 11502: 9751:. The goal is to better meet the needs of the various types of people who read Tech News. The survey will be open for 3 more days. The survey is covered by 9731:. The goal is to better meet the needs of the various types of people who read Tech News. The survey will be open for 1 more week. The survey is covered by 9347:). It looks like you're a maths lecturer, so I suggest you introduce yourself as that. (Indeed, I've just spotted that we even have an article about you at 7398: 6179:. Clearly, he is an eminent physician, but there may be some uncertainty about whether he meets Knowledge's notability. I would advise (after declaring any 4746: 3049: 12184: 11648: 11563: 11554: 11289: 10286: 9273: 9207:, and the coordination group can collaboratively review the issues discussed and, where appropriate, bring them to the attention of the Unicode Consortium. 8571: 7128: 6823: 6806: 6778: 6742: 6728: 6714: 6659: 6648: 6417: 6329: 5983: 5569: 5238: 5054: 4483: 4352: 4338: 4305: 4296: 2932: 2011: 2002: 1952: 1632: 1618: 1573: 1564: 858: 657: 594: 11959: 11466: 10296: 9847: 4834:

for details. The new markup will be the same as in the new Parsoid wikitext parser. You can test your gadget or stylesheet with the new markup if you add

3198: 12584: 12575: 11839: 11767: 10588: 5735: 5598: 5580: 5571: 5249: 5240: 4603: 3694:. A citation is another word for a reference that supports a factual statement. So, I’m unclear why you linked to the images page of our Manual of Style. 3529: 1800: 431: 12530:. That means it's up there amongst the very top quality articles in this encyclopaedia. The page is popular and prone to vandalism and bad edits, so is 10865:

Team, all global blocks would prevent account creation. This will allow stewards to reduce the unintended side-effects of global blocks on IP addresses.

9238:. The goal is to better meet the needs of the various types of people who read Tech News. The survey will be open for 2 weeks. The survey is covered by 8833: 8191: 7390: 4498: 11075: 10599: 10590: 10569:

is available. It includes: New design previews for Translatable pages; Updates about MinT for Wiki Readers; the release of Translation dumps; and more.

9609: 9600: 8053:. It will change on 22 May in some skins (Timeless, Modern, CologneBlue, Nostalgia, and Monobook). Please test gadgets on your wiki on these skins and 7667:

interested in what any subject says about themselves. People should look to other social media platforms if they simply want to write about themselves.

7160: 4927: 4866: 4857: 4855: 4427: 3989: 3980: 3335: 2476:. Not only can you simply carry on editing that page; you absolutely should if it is to stand more than an ice cube's chance in hell of being accepted! 2181: 2172: 1963: 1954: 470: 12093: 910:

Thank you so much, Nick! All very good points and instructions. I will work on them the best I can in the coming days and submit the page for review.

11749: 11740: 10646: 10390: 10195: 10186: 10184: 9889: 9857: 9598: 9526: 9162: 8629: 8614: 6602: 6588: 6574: 6545: 6531: 6495: 6482: 6374:

It's acceptable to have your attention drawn to an editor's activities by one problem and for you to then look into other edits. But be aware of not

6003: 5994: 5992: 4587: 4422: 4156: 4129: 4120: 3820: 3511: 3498: 3278: 2202:, and that just because its products are in planetary rovers it doesn't mean that every manufacturer thaqt NASA uses should have an article about it. 2077:). It was hard work, but very satisfying. I've just checked, and it took over 300 edits to get it there. That involves very careful understanding of 1811: 1802: 1419: 824: 344: 335: 11861: 11059: 8782: 8728: 4973:

respond to the post on your user talk page asking you to declare one way or the other, please, before you make any further edits to draft articles.

3738: 2116:, explaining your aspiration for a GA nomination. That could give you some quick pointers of any major, but overlooked issues to address, including 1394: 11422: 11229: 10783: 10664: 10401: 10392: 10158: 9616: 9115: 8484: 8209: 8066: 7957: 7948: 6149: 4401: 3540: 3531: 3284: 3018: 2810: 798: 12250: 9515: 6168:

disclose it on your userpage. If you do know, or are related to this person, please read how to make clear your connection by reading guidance at

5876: 4742: 4738: 4721:

has been removed from all Wikisource wikis, as it was broken. This does not affect the ability to download normal books, which is provided by the

4650: 3002: 2686:. Don’t worry - you were on the right track. Just use the big blue ‘publish’ button to save your edits in Draft (or anywhere else for that matter) 2205:

Generally, I'm reluctant to immediately push articles towards a deletion discussion. Before rushing to suggest deletion, we have a process called

1326: 12070: 11778: 11769: 11722: 11708: 11687: 11642: 11166: 10760: 9592: 9569: 9408: 9394: 9329: 9320: 8668: 8645: 8525: 8351:

Any answer must depend entirely upon the quality of your source(s). I’m away on holiday at the moment; did I not answer your question earlier at

7946: 7203: 6209: 6160: 6151: 5853: 5680: 5217: 5132: 4627: 4087: 3379: 3365: 3346: 3337: 3255: 2090: 1371: 445: 433: 12412: 11927: 11922: 11907: 11488: 11170: 11148: 10862: 10513: 9994: 9816: 9662: 9200: 8917: 7256:

I’m really sorry, I’m away on holiday all week and am unable to look at this in enough detail to be helpful. You could either seek input at the

7226: 6819:

Hi Nick. I'm battling to add the Coroner's Report and news article to the Burj Khalifa page but hopefully by the end of the day it will be done.

6057: 4437: 3069: 1041: 12630: 12612: 11418: 10502: 10154: 9318: 9111: 8937: 8935: 8507: 8205: 8016: 6022:. You can switch between them using the sloping grey pencil icon - usually on the upper right of the editing screen. Hope this helps. Regards, 5143: 5134: 5077:

I've also lost phone edits when my phone has been inactive for a while and has shut down. It doesn't seem to cache content like a desktop does.

4993: 4599: 3298:

You can post an edit to an article immediately. However you need to have made ten edits and have an account at least 4 days old before you are

2806: 794: 536: 481: 472: 12534:. This means that, providing a user has already made 10 edits and their account is over 4 days old, they may edit it, providing what is added 12367: 11532: 11063: 10633: 10261: 9658: 9183: 8953: 8848: 7553: 3151:

Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (

1254: 1249: 1244: 1231: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1203: 1198: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1157: 1144: 1134: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1077: 1064: 12260:

Editors of wikis using Wikidata will now be notified of only relevant Wikidata changes in their watchlist. This is because the Lua functions

12075: 11624:

hi! Thanks for feed back. What I did was to add my website URL as reference. So no surprise its gone. BUt why is the prev. version page gone?

11367: 11358: 11352: 11341: 11335: 11038:

Editors who want to re-use references but with different details such as page numbers, will be able to do so by the end of 2024, using a new

10882: 10765: 10128: 10119: 10109: 10103: 10095: 10089: 9926:(a similar tool logging the user out of their account) are unaffected by this change. The new global account block feature is related to the 9574: 9511: 9475: 9080: 9074: 9066: 9060: 9054: 8909: 8738:

There was a bug with the Content Translation interface that caused the tools menus to appear in the wrong location. This has now been fixed.

8650: 8167: 8157: 8151: 8143: 8137: 8131: 7693: 7208: 7026: 6892: 5858: 5004: 4995: 4954: 4945: 4943: 4632: 4611: 4607: 4167: 4158: 4049: 3831: 3822: 3757:

There was a bug that affected the appearance of visited links when using mobile device to access wiki sites. It made the links appear black;

3295: 3286: 3260: 3130: 2786: 2775: 2771: 2763: 2759: 2674: 1376: 980: 966: 940: 926: 911: 835: 826: 771: 763: 757: 749: 743: 734: 11886: 11874: 11140: 10523: 10206:

write about you or me in detail and in depth, are either of us are ever going qualify for having an article about us here on Knowledge. See

9922:

only IP addresses and IP ranges could be blocked globally. Global account blocks are useful when the blocked user should not be logged out.

9187: 8928:

will be unavailable for roughly two hours on Tuesday 10:00–12:00 UTC. This is to enable migration to a new server and upgrade its software.

7533: 7439: 5745: 5203:

will be increased to its previous value of 1.65. Different options for typography can also be set using the options in the menu, as needed.

4377: 3110: 1654:

on how to do this. And, if you're being paid to do this, you have an obligation to declare who is paying you, so please see instructions at

1590:

I received the below message when trying to update the Knowledge page image for Dione Joseph. I am using this account. It is my own account.

11541:(30 mins) - an overview for both technical and non technical audiences, covering some of the challenges and open questions, related to the 11067: 11055: 10878: 9358:

to a properly published book, if at all possible. But you might like to look at the 'Simple English' language version of this article (see

8567: 7112: 6903: 6894: 5067: 4595: 4487: 2978:

If you’re viewing Knowledge in ‘Desktop’ mode, look either for the ‘Edit’ tab towards the top of each page, or beside each section heading.

11791:

If you are connected to the business or its owner in any way, you should declare your ‘conflict of interest’ by following instructions at

11473: 10842: 10679: 10573: 10348: 10274: 9934: 9808: 9449: 8471: 7383: 5781: 8397: 6347:

Interesting question! People always bring their own biases and interests when editing. That's why it's important that a balance of good,

3044: 2887:

Finally, if you propose to make further edits to that article, we do require you to declare you connection with it in you userpage. (See

1054: 995:

button. But that merely publishes those edits to the online Draft. It is not yet a published article (which would be found eventually at

12245: 11071: 10723:. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked. 10506: 10306:. The team has decided which visualization library to use, which chart types to start focusing on, and where to store chart definitions. 9412:

could contribute effectively to a suite of article on oceanic and Antarctic topics. But it does take commitment, and I'm not the person

7658:

with the topic have not written about it in detail and in depth, then there can never be an article about it here. So, your creation of

7464: 7341: 7013: 5776: 4831: 4722: 4718: 4447: 12065: 10952:

I should thank you too. I appreciate you taking me through CVUA even if I haven't actually done that much countervandalism since then.

10755: 9564: 8640: 7198: 5848: 4622: 3250: 3023: 2574:

on how to start and grow a draft article to submit for review only when it's suitable for this encyclopaedia (and not before). Thanks,

2018:

It's less of a concern if a link to another Knowledge page has changed. But, once again, there are many, many cases here (we call them

1366: 10468: 10013: 8057:

so that they can be resolved before this change is made in all other skins. The developers are also considering the introduction of a

5256:

be notable, as defined by Knowledge. i.e. the world at large has taken notice of them. Our criteria for notable people can be read at

4795:

A usability improvement to the "Add a citation" in Knowledge workflow has been made, the insert button was moved to the popup header.

2349:

thanks very much for your help, I will comply to what you have told and am glad that the earth still has such good people as you are.

1469:

photograph. So just get them to create an account for themselves - please don't share one account between two or more people. Cheers,

12477:

handlers to help simplify development, research about performance improvements, work to improve the REST API for end-users, and more.

11078:. Wikis that have created the category locally should rename their local creation to match. Thanks to Pppery for these improvements. 7960:

Thank you for your question. Could you tell me what sort of page you want to create? This is an encyclopaedia of notable topics (see

7049: 6271: 5976: 5935: 12454: 12348: 11180:

is available, and includes some highlights from Wikimania, an upcoming Language community meeting, and other news from the movement.

10460: 10404:

Only people who meet Knowledge’s definition of ‘Notable’ can have an article about them here. Please read these carefully at either

9984: 8847:

is now available on category and help pages, as well as more special pages. There may be contrast issues. Please report bugs on the

7670:

So, having said that, could I ask you what sort of article you might hope to publish in this Encyclopaedia? And can you link to any

6998:

I have left you a welcome message on your talk page with useful links to help you learn the basics of editing. Regards from the UK,

6430: 6070: 3954:

motorway at top speed. So please don't do the equivalent on Knowledge without first learning the controls and the rules of the road!

3847:

about Notable subjects (as defined by Knowledge). They MUST meet our notability criteria, or they will be liable for deletion. (see

1413: 11434: 10538:

The new parser is being rolled out on Wikivoyage wikis over the next few months. The English Wikivoyage and Hebrew Wikivoyage were

10170: 9127: 8699:

so that they can be resolved before this change is made in Vector-2022. The developers are still considering the introduction of a

8221: 7415:

On Wikisource there is a special page listing pages of works without corresponding scan images. Now you can use the new magic word

6506:, and means that we can only have articles on Wikiepdia about topics already described and written about in detail and in depth by 5033:

I am at the point of removing your editing rights if you fail to answer this question, either here on my talk page, or on your own.

3543:. I'm not quite sure what "points" you're referring to. Do you mean the numbers in red and green that you see when looking at your 3089: 3074: 2822: 810: 10700: 10493:

Communities can request the activation of the visual editor on entire namespaces where discussions sometimes happen (for instance

8901: 7297: 6108: 5922:

The Wikimedia Foundation has an annual plan. The annual plan decides what the Wikimedia Foundation will work on. You can now read

5209: 5200: 4768: 3837:

If you're thinking of creating a brand new article (a very hard task - especially for a brand new editor), there's good advice at

11428: 10164: 9121: 8863:

Cloud Services tools were not available for 25 minutes last week. This was caused by a faulty hardware cable in the data center.

8816: 8215: 6089: 4181:

to declare who is paying you, and what they're wanting you to write about. Instructions for making that declaration are found at

2816: 2479:

May I be blunt? It is totally unacceptable as it stands! You've not created an encyclopaedia entry about John Merrick, based on

804: 12567: 9942: 7968:). For that reason, your second post to may talk page called "Why men abuse women" is way outside the realms of what we do here. 7687: 5371: 4025: 2648: 2631: 2598: 2583: 2540: 2519: 2467: 2435: 10045: 9930:

project, which is a new type of user account that replaces IP addresses of unregistered editors that are no longer made public.

9622: 9287:, and welcome to Knowledge! The most important thing to un=derstand is that this is an encyclopaedia. The topics must meet our 8583:

feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title.

8242:

Several bugs related to the latest updates to the UploadWizard on Wikimedia Commons have been fixed. For more information, see

8009:

feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title.

3958: 3652:

To learn how to edit, follow the link in the blue button in the welcome message I see has been left on your userpage. Regards,

3594: 1674:

on how to add citations. So please address this, or remove the unverifiable information added by your earlier, blocked account.

12396: 12359: 11223: 7379: 4471: 3972: 3888:

have factual statements with citations that can be verified by anyone, anywhere in the world with access to good library (see

2891:

for how to do this.) I’m sorry if all this sounds rather negative and I hope you are able to act on these concerns. Regards,

12198:

Yes. You can use sources such as books, journals, newspapers, etc in ‘‘any’’ language. In all cases they must be regarded as

12026: 9470: 8829: 7455: 5357: 4396: 3547:? If so, these are just the number of bytes your saved edit either added (green text) or removed (red text) from the article. 2981:

We offer a choice of two editing tools. Depending which one you used last, it’ll either say “Edit source” or, simply, “Edit”.

2350: 1325:, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were 12129: 11147:. Thank you to Mbch331 for filing the bug report. You can read about that, and 18 other community-submitted tasks that were 11102:. This enables wikis to configure workflows such as category-specific edit notices. Thanks to SD001 for these improvements. 9669: 9227:

Editors can once again click on links within the visual editor's citation-preview, thanks to a bug fix by the Editing Team.

9190:

on their home wikis, in order to better recruit and retain new editors. More options will be provided in the coming months.

8580: 8006: 2996: 2900: 2344: 1922: 1794: 1556: 1447:

okay, thanks for clearing this up! my friend has a photo they personally took of a celebrity so we'll use that one instead.

12089: 10914: 10779: 9588: 8664: 8259: 7222: 5872: 4646: 4288: 3274: 3039: 1390: 11288:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

10988:

Well there's still a few classes I need to take first but hopefully I'll have a seafaring job within the next few months.

10924:. All attempts to link to it from within Knowledge would be regarded as spam. It should remain Blacklisted in my opinion. 9915: 8925: 8695:. It was changed last week in some skins (Vector legacy and Minerva). Please test gadgets on your wiki on these skins and 7247: 6831: 6745:

You're nearly able to. Your account is old enough, but needs to have made 10 or more edits. You've made nine so far! (See

6328:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

5808:

The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (

5264:

published sources that talk about that person, there can be no article about them. Templates are not essential items, but

4698: 3749: 2315:

would be able to have an article (unless they happened to already meet our general notability criteria for living people,

593:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

11855: 11408: 8681:

The software used to render SVG files has been updated to a new version, fixing many longstanding bugs in SVG rendering.

6263: 6249: 5407: 5397:

The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes.

3432:

In desktop mode, your Homepage tab offers you easy edits to improve articles. You may find this helpful, too. Good luck!

2372: 2358: 31: 12474: 10827: 10808: 9923: 9439: 9312: 7323:

Interface admins now have greater control over the styling of article components on mobile with the introduction of the

6139: 3661: 3490: 3441: 3403: 838:. That's certainly a pretty good first effort -well done. But I should point out a few things that will need addressing. 12036: 11752:. Welcome to Knowledge. Do you need help with editing something? Let me know if you need support. Regards from the Uk, 11605: 11318: 11088:

Technical volunteers who edit modules and want to get a list of the categories used on a page, can now do so using the

10933: 10072: 9875: 9040: 8117: 7273: 6814: 6800: 6786: 6772: 6736: 6722: 6704: 6399: 5828: 4502: 4367: 4346: 4332: 4252: 2745: 2271: 2164: 2150: 2136: 2053: 1690: 1626: 1585: 785: 720: 12597: 9977: 8396:

It is now possible for local administrators to add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without JavaScript.

8173: 7719:

We see a lot of removal of cited paragrpahs when someone believes it is incorreect. That can esaily be interpreted as

5646: 5592: 5313: 4029: 3715:

I‘ll also leave a welcome message on your own talk page with some very useful links about learning to edit. Regards ,

2954: 12392: 11297: 10627: 10005: 9644: 8844: 8358:

Try and engage with other editors if they revert you and see if you can justify your proposed edit to them. Regards,

6573:

It's okay at least I've tried having fun with the page I've used. :) but Thanks for telling me for some information.

5285:

Then, once you're ready, and know how to add citations to the sources you base your article on, you can read more at

4935: 4918: 4005: 2227: 1994: 306:

only have a tiny vocabulary and limited knowledge of how to say things correctly. I certainly can't write in German.)

11761: 11619: 11021: 11000: 10983: 10964: 10246: 10000:

How can Wikimedia build innovative and experimental products while maintaining such heavily used websites? A recent

9901: 9267: 8973: 8090: 7938: 7921: 7850: 7007: 6632: 6596: 6582: 6568: 6539: 6524: 6085: 6031: 4150: 3586: 3523: 2141:

I hadn't even considered that as a reason to make a user page! I'll get on it, and do as you suggest. Thanks again!

1944: 1862: 1757: 376: 12229: 12215: 11610:

PS: Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been away from my computer rather a lot recently. in this fine weather.

10439: 10369: 8381: 8367: 7992: 5555: 5537: 5519: 5502: 5122: 5104: 5090: 4233: 3724: 3682: 3568: 2644: 2594: 2536: 2463: 11818: 11509: 11269:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

10419:

You draft about yourself was deleted because it was not based on any independent, published sources, and was pure

9425: 9379: 6309:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

6217: 6200: 5479: 5304:

Let me know how you get on. (I've left a welcome message with some useful links on your user talk page). Regards,

3373: 3359: 2850:

unfortunately the account name you’ve chosen is not ok as it can imply more than one person has access to it. See

2447:

Thank you we were able to submit the Judge John J Merrick page for review, however we were wondering if we could:

1492: 1478: 1456: 1442: 574:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

464: 12085: 11670: 11518:

If you're curious about the product and technology improvements made by the Wikimedia Foundation last year, read

10775: 9584: 8660: 7823: 7805: 7779: 7232: 7218: 5868: 5725: 5510:

I will keep that in mind. But I was told by Chidgk1 that I could make a binomial name section as an alternative.

5166: 4830:

The HTML markup of headings and section edit links will be changed later this year to improve accessibility. See

4642: 3270: 2716: 2702: 2450:

continue adding to the existing page while it is being reviewed because we have many other sources & articles

2233: 2106: 2086: 1386: 516: 440:

I don't have a question now but I will soon have some, Glad to know that you will be there to answer. Thank You.

327: 286: 220: 215: 208: 203: 198: 191: 186: 181: 174: 169: 164: 157: 152: 147: 140: 135: 130: 123: 118: 113: 12425: 12362:

exist on each wiki, and some details about how they are configured. Thanks to DannyS712 for these improvements.

11785:. In essence, you will need to be able to base any new article on at least THREE, detailed, independent sources. 11465:

type of user account that replaces IP addresses of unregistered editors which are no longer made public. Please

10854: 10527: 10260:

numbering issues in Visual Editor. If you notice any related problems on your wiki, please share details at the

9955: 9402: 7427: 7308: 7187: 6862: 6074: 5048: 4982: 4227: 3932: 3387: 3329: 3203: 1646:

Before commenting on the image issue, I must point out that, if correct, you still have an obvious, undeclared

1027: 974: 959: 934: 919: 905: 11963: 9842:

Next week, functionaries, volunteers maintaining tools, and software development teams are invited to test the

9628: 7708: 6963: 3748:

Users' feedback will validate the impact of various use cases and workflows around the Wikidata Query service.

2388: 106: 101: 96: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 11542: 10543: 9972: 9354:

We would prefer not to use what appears as an online university course note as a source, preferring instead a

8771: 8712: 7647:. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia of 'Notable Topics'. Not everything in this world is regarded by Knowledge as 5739: 4734: 4678:) to this question? You are not permitted to operate two accounts at once, except under special circumstances. 3844:

Just always remember that this is an encyclopaedia, not an advertising site, and as such all articles should:

1734: 12176: 12165: 10609:, you stand no chance here. In that case, please go and use a social media platform to promote yourself. See 10145: 10051: 9102: 6466: 5821:

to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

3801: 3795: 2724: 12272:

will have their logic unified for tracking different aspects of sitelinks to reduce junk notifications from

11795:. And if you are accepting payment to do so, you are obliged to declare who is paying you, per our rules at 11580:, so it could well have been deleted under one of our processes (either a WP:AFD|Deletion Discussion]] or a 9770: 9766: 9550: 7431: 7430:"Show preview without reloading the page", then the template-page feature "Preview page with this template ( 5146:

Can you link to both the article and the source you'd like to add? I might then be able to guide you better.

5015:

to understand what Reliable Sources mean. Those sources must be sufficient to demonstrate that the topic is

4276:

I have left a Welcome message on your talk page, containing a valuable link to getting started with editing.

3214: 12152:

For instant help with a particular problem, you will find it a lot more helpful to ask single questions at

11539:

Future of MediaWiki. A sustainable platform to support a collaborative user base and billions of page views

11127: 10713: 9612:. Thanks for your question. I think you should find all the answers to your question in these three links: 7659: 6225: 5893:

beta feature will notice that the default line height for the standard and large text options has changed.

5629:, and submitted for review and feedback when it's ready. You can find details of how a draft is started at 5301:

for guidance on how to use either of out two editing tools to add references to support any article text.

4583: 3641:

Should you know or are being paid by this person to create an article, then you would need to declare your

3181: 2498:

If you think this person is notable, tell me what sources you would base it upon that demonstrate he meets

2411:

If you're related, add a note on your userpage to declare that connection. Instructions are to be found at

2255: 692: 425: 12146: 11953:

applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past

10512:

The tracking category "Pages using Timeline" has been renamed to "Pages using the EasyTimeline extension"

9946: 9938: 9937:(also known as "Pending Changes") is improved and consistent with the rest of the MediaWiki interface and 9537: 9536:

Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript.

7753:

citations to support it, and ask them what they feel is best. If you feel the cited author is actually an

6142:

as their default editor on mobile. This deployment is made at all wikis except for the English Knowledge.

4490:

is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the

2490:...Grrr: and now I've just followed the sole link and discovered you've abused one of our golden rules by 12519: 12510: 12439: 12435: 10720: 9019: 7644: 7635: 5037:

We require clarity, one way or another, and you should stop editing until you have answered this question

4189:

that you may need to declare if you know the owners, once worked for them, or are a client etc etc). See

2640: 2604: 2590: 2546: 2532: 2473: 2459: 2397: 2384: 9774: 5951: 943:

The Submit for Review button works, but is only visible and works only when you’re NOT editing the page!

507:

I will leave a welcome message on your Talk Page with a few useful links to get you started. Good luck!

416: 12449:

Next week, all Wikimedia wikis will be read-only for a few minutes. This will start on September 25 at

11662:? If so, you can view all past edits (even deleted or reverted ones) by clicking the View History tab ( 11238: 10214: 9247: 6111:

on mobile will notice there has been an improvement in the line height across all typography settings.

5833: 3577:

has just this second 'soft-blocked' you. Don't panic - just follow the instructions on your talk page.

3185: 1985:

Let me know how you get on, and I can check and give you feedback, if you'd like. Regards from the UK,

12424:

need to be updated. These old classes will be removed next week or soon afterwards. Editors can use a

10530:. The teams are particularly looking for details about successful collaborations on non-English wikis. 8993: 8890: 8755: 8449: 8323: 8034: 7488: 7361: 7296:

The appearance of talk pages changed for all wikis, except for Commons, Wikidata and most Wikipedias (

6867: 6448: 6128: 5910: 5441: 5189: 4812: 4177:

Firstly, If you are being paid to create an article (i.e. you're an employee or a freelancer) you are

4069: 3776: 402: 12404: 12306: 11402: 10939: 8096: 7887: 6280: 6259: 2549:

OK, but you've broken another of our golden rules! We hold a strict one person per account rule. See

1967: 545: 8989: 8886: 7115:

has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including

6124: 5906: 5437: 5185: 4808: 4737:

wikitext parser by default to generate all pages in the Talk namespace. Report any problems on the

4065: 3772: 11987: 10823: 9435: 9344: 8621: 7877:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

7707:

Whilst I don't frequent fr.wiki, nor understand its processes, I would tend to agree with you that

7458:. An exception for this feature is wikis like Wikivoyage where the miniature maps are interactive. 6462: 6037: 5837: 3399: 9752: 9732: 9239: 8751: 8692: 8445: 8319: 8050: 8030: 7484: 7357: 6444: 5374:

main menu has been removed now that users have learned the new location of the Language switcher.

4524: 11651:. I've looked at the contributions for that IPv4 address, and it has never edited Knowledge (see 10610: 10413: 10230: 7964:). It is not a place for you to promote your views or campaign on issues dear to your heart (see 7311:("Show discussion activity"). The deployment will happen at remaining wikis in the coming weeks. 7243: 6827: 6810: 6782: 6732: 6718: 6486: 6381:

Always try to base any discussion over your concerns by including a link on their talk page to a

6019: 6015: 5652: 5267: 4342: 4323:

New users are far better off learning how Knowledge operates by editing existing pages. Regards,

4211:. If you cannot demonstrate that three or more independent sources have written about a business 3302:(See that link to see what it permits you to do). This includes creating new articles, but it is 3299: 2925: 2332: 2146: 1928: 352: 12048:

is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the

7156:

This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.

6587:

I also took pictures and video just in case it's removed, but please DON'T Remove the articles.

6548:

With a paltry 300 views per episode in a year, you're simply wasting your time here. Maybe it's

3859:

for companies. There are other notability criteria for various other topics, of course, such as

3742: 2323:. National newspapers, magazines and book and TV broadcasts with editorial oversight are needed. 10277:

rules which led to caching problems. Fixes have been applied and investigations are continuing.

7972: 2199: 1885:

So, to get corrections or additions made to an article about you, you will need to first find

1700: 602: 12052:. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. 11210:

That said,the best overall advice I can give you for creating your first article can be found

10551:

There will be more than 200 sessions at Wikimania this week. Here is a summary of some of the

7879: 7389:

Starting May 21, English Knowledge and German Knowledge will get the possibility to activate "

3146:

about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

12355: 12331: 12237: 12203: 11508:

Do you have a project and are willing to provide a three (3) month mentorship for an intern?

11448: 11031: 10835: 10445: 10252: 9907: 9740: 9684:

feature. This feature presents opportunities for small but useful contributions to Knowledge.

9650: 9141: 8944: 8808: 8674: 8418: 8389: 8235: 7998: 7408: 7281: 6879:

The number of edits they make during their first two weeks on the wiki (+21.8% over baseline)

6873:

The likelihood that mobile web newcomers make their first article edit (+17.0% over baseline)

6405: 6045: 5882: 5625:(we block editors who abuse Knowledge for their own interests!), and should be prepared as a 5363: 5172: 4931: 4704: 4011: 3730: 3556: 3231: 2945:

Let me know if you have any specific problems after trying one of those two routes. Regards,

2028: 1897: 1842: 10675: 10642: 9748: 9728: 9235: 8770:

The new version of MediaWiki includes another change to the HTML markup used for citations:

8480: 8405:

The message name for the definition of the tracking category of WikiHiero has changed from "

7086: 7022: 5424:

languages reported RevisionSlider reacting wrong to mouse clicks. This should be fixed now.

4520: 3378:

HI Nick. Ive now re-added the information but removed the external link. I hope that is OK

2259: 1227: 1153: 1060: 492:, and add them as an 'inline citation' at the end of each factual addition you want to make. 12290: 12171: 12142: 12049: 11915: 11903: 11882: 11870: 11835: 11826: 10997: 10961: 10696: 10652: 10516:. Wikis that have created the category locally should rename their local creation to match. 10384: 10379: 9693:

percentage of authors contributing more than 5 patches has increased by 25% since last year

9657:

At the Wikimedia Foundation a new task force was formed to replace the disabled Graph with

9489: 9300: 8703:

if that would be helpful to tool creators, and would appreciate any input you have on that.

8550: 8518: 8490: 8061:

if that would be helpful to tool creators, and would appreciate any input you have on that.

7965: 7935: 7770:

improvements to articles - so go for it, and don't be down-heartened. Regards from the UK,

7345: 7166: 7098: 7065: 7032: 6918: 6670: 6607: 6592: 6578: 6559:. There are plenty of places where that can happen, but not here. (Please read the links). 6535: 6503: 6255: 6232: 5759: 5702: 5337: 5298: 5154: 5095:

I will switch from now on, but meanwhile what do I do to get out of this frozen situation?

4467: 4410: 3751: 3709: 3171:

for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at

3118: 3106: 3085: 3032: 2615:

If you can’t show that he’s Notable, then you’d simply be wasting your time trying further.

2267: 2113: 1781:

Do you have a photo that you own the copyright of? If so, do you need help in uploading it?

1731: 1410: 1350: 1237: 1163: 1070: 988: 846: 522: 10813:

Completely understandable, I didn't expect you to reply right away. I too haven't been on

10412:. If you meet these criteria then please leave it to someone else to write about you. See 10001: 7678:

for guidance on creating your first article. Come back if you need further help. Regards,

6093: 5026:

to understand your obligations to declare that you are receiving money or have some other

4552: 4532: 4100: 3184:

will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The

8: 12114: 10819: 10796: 10420: 10374: 10226: 9336: 8377: 7748:

which would send them an alert notification. However, they were not the reverting editor

7720: 6556: 5809: 5622: 5551: 5515: 5475: 5400: 5212:

will be changed to provide more consistency with our other platforms and best practices.

5100: 5063: 4877: 4511: 4197: 3792: 3708:

For our simpler, more ‘WISYWYG’ Visual Editor, please follow guidance via this shortcut:

3152: 2873: 2550: 1838: 12299:

namespace added to their Wikipedias. This improvement ensures that links beginning with

11627:

My IP address was 78.68.39.103 (only a few days ago I edited the apge- not a new article

9892:

No, not a problem. We aim to make the Teahouse a warm and welcoming place for everyone.

9856:

the large amount of copyright violations uploaded this way. There is a short summary at

9791:

Editors with rollback user-rights who use the Knowledge App for Android can use the new

7793: 7736:? Without knowing that, the sentence is quite meaningless. So it's ripe for improvement. 6886: 6849: 6097: 5402: 4548: 887:

and indexed by Google. The latter doesn't happen until the review process has completed.

12618: 12523: 10709: 9398: 9355: 7789: 7287: 7253: 7239: 6992: 6948:

I hope this helps. Do let me know if you need any further support! Regards from the UK.

6924: 6691:

I hope this helps. Do let me know if you need any further support! Regards from the UK.

6676: 6433:

for the fifth edition of the Coolest Tool Award. Nominations will be open until May 10.

6375: 6344: 6213: 6169: 6011: 5708: 5343: 5294: 5150: 4264: 4240: 3702: 3502: 3383: 3369: 2938: 2866: 2851: 2142: 2070: 2061: 2019: 1932: 1671: 1488: 1452: 865: 674: 382: 10356: 9463: 5113:

All I can suggest is turning your device off and starting from a fresh reboot. Sorry.

4556: 4389: 3394:

Got it... I will get started with other pages. Thanks, I wasn't sure how that worked.

3011: 1837:

So, what you want to write about must meet at least on of those criteria. It can't be

1191: 1107: 1050: 12555: 12400: 11483:

Editors who use the 2010 wikitext editor, and use the Character Insert buttons, will

11396: 11272:

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

10947: 10199: 10008:, where the goal is not to build polished products but test out new ideas, such as a 9541: 7801: 7648: 7421:

to exclude certain pages (list of editions or translations of works) from that list.

6940: 6685: 6620: 6549: 6356: 6337: 6053: 4317: 3864: 2917: 2908: 2712: 2491: 2191:

So, yes, I think it merits a severe trim or, more probably, a deletion discussion at

2074: 1831: 1827: 1650:

and should not be editing her article without declaring your connection to her. See

1524: 12343:

Editors interested in templates can help by reading the latest Wishlist focus area,

12149:

to articles so far. But don't let that put you off - we all have to start somewhere!

11655:). But IP addresses are dynamic, and can change over time, so maybe that wasn't it. 9032: 5959: 5458: 5406:

Communities can now customize the default reasons for undeleting a page by creating

5232: 5009:"what if I don't have any references to cite as sources for what I want to publish?" 4572: 4536: 1353:. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. 12020:

is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

10409: 9695:, which helps ensure the sustainability of the platform for the Wikimedia projects. 8605: 7763: 6882:

A lower probability of the newcomers' edits will be reverted (-3.3% over baseline).

4717:

page (as well as the associated "Create a book" functionality) provided by the old

4510:

The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (

3996:

Was there something in particular that you wanted to work on? Regards from the UK.

3898:

connected to the subject. If they are connected, this fact must be made clear (see

3860: 3552: 2928:, you will find guidance on adding citations (=references) at the following pages: 2855: 2503: 2312: 2206: 1896:

Then follow the instructions to make an 'edit request' on the article's talk page (

1604:

If you receive this message when you try to edit, create, or move an existing page:

970: 930: 915: 681: 501: 497: 253: 12492: 11663: 11484: 11266:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

11144: 10539: 10482: 10270: 9963:

Have you tried monitoring and addressing vandalism in Knowledge using your phone?

9812: 9811:

can once again use non-open access content in SpringerLinks, after the Foundation

9701: 8905: 8870: 8700: 8305: 8263: 8247: 8243: 8058: 7618: 7394: 7300:

have already received this design change). You can read the detail of the changes

7138: 6906:

As you know, it's important to support any factual statement with a citation to a

6727:

The Burj Khalifa page is semi-protected. Would I be able to make these additions?

4757: 4576: 4564: 4560: 4042: 4034: 3758: 12622: 12589: 12559: 12207: 12157: 12121: 11847: 11810: 11782: 11753: 11714: 11679: 11611: 11597: 11215: 11013: 11006: 10989: 10975: 10970: 10953: 10925: 10800: 10619: 10431: 10238: 10218: 10064: 10037: 9893: 9636: 9417: 9371: 9304: 9259: 9254: 9099:

A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Knowledge.

8864: 8359: 8082: 8077: 8068: 7984: 7927: 7913: 7909: 7842: 7815: 7771: 7679: 7265: 6999: 6984: 6975: 6971: 6955: 6792: 6764: 6696: 6624: 6560: 6516: 6391: 6241: 6192: 6176: 6039: 6023: 5796: 5717: 5638: 5626: 5614: 5584: 5529: 5494: 5349: 5305: 5158: 5114: 5082: 5040: 4974: 4924: 4910: 4881: 4690: 4544: 4359: 4324: 4280: 4244: 4219: 4218:

I hope this gives some clarity on what's allowed here, and what is not. Regards,

4208: 4142: 4134: 3997: 3964: 3924: 3856: 3716: 3653: 3578: 3560: 3515: 3482: 3433: 3351: 3321: 2988: 2946: 2892: 2694: 2623: 2575: 2511: 2427: 2364: 2336: 2263: 2219: 2185: 2128: 2045: 1986: 1936: 1914: 1854: 1786: 1749: 1744: 1723: 1682: 1577: 1548: 1470: 1434: 1402: 1019: 991:, and then you will need to save those edits into the draft (by hitting the blue 951: 897: 864:

Also on citations: don't use other Knowledge pages as a source for facts. Simply

508: 456: 368: 319: 278: 11948: 11133: 10858: 9919: 9691:

who have contributed to MediaWiki Core. As a result of these contributions, the

9680:

Editors using the iOS Knowledge app who have more than 50 edits can now use the

8696: 8584: 8054: 5664: 5621:

Any attempt to make an article must be encyclopedic in nature, and not done for

4905:

Finally, if you are connected in any way with this topic, you must declare your

4674:

Before answering you, could you explain why you're linking in a second account (

4568: 4540: 1534:

If you plan to continue editing her page, you should declare your connection to

12531: 12221: 12195: 12186: 11796: 11393:

when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply:

11379: 11263:

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

10606: 10405: 10362: 10207: 8373: 8348: 7745: 7504: 7261: 6855: 6746: 6382: 6188: 5800: 5603: 5547: 5525: 5511: 5485: 5471: 5257: 5110: 5096: 5074: 5059: 5023: 4313: 4182: 4028:

on specific wikis. The changes impacted the following Wikis: all projects with

3903: 3882: 3852: 3691: 3678: 3646: 3612: 2737: 2499: 2484: 2405: 2316: 2040:

But, when in doubt, just leave it as it is and let someone else ponder over it!

1823: 1709: 1655: 1520: 996: 842: 359: 315: 11310: 8999: 8896: 8761: 8455: 8329: 8040: 7494: 7367: 6454: 6134: 5916: 5451:

All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on March 20. This is planned at

5447: 5199:

After consulting with various communities, the line height of the text on the

5195: 4818: 4771:

allow interface admins to create custom features with CSS and JavaScript. The

4075: 3782: 2622:

Can you confirm you have changed your password and will not share it, please?

1576:

Which account were you using? I can't help you without knowing more. Regards,

395: 388: 232: 12326: 11967: 11944: 11806: 11792: 11674:

suitable for an encyclopaedia, and all based upon {{WP:RS|Reliable Sources]].

11581: 11570: 11211: 11202:

Can I ask what topic you would like to write about? It will need to meet our

11199:. Sorry for the delay in replying to you-I’ve been away for a couple of days. 10427: 9288: 9182:

Knowledge Admins can customize local wiki configuration options easily using

7979: 7961: 7675: 6615: 6511: 6387: 6180: 5634: 5630: 5290: 5286: 5279: 5027: 4906: 4895: 4888: 4491: 4309: 4190: 4186: 3950: 3917: 3907: 3899: 3848: 3838: 3642: 3635: 3628: 3616: 3574: 3466: 3312: 3308: 2888: 2880:

to demonstrate that it actually meets Knowledge’s Notability Guidelines (See

2571: 2559: 2423: 2412: 2328: 2308: 2192: 2117: 1814:. Not any topic, no. We can only have topics in this encyclopaedia which are 1722:

For being someone I've always looked up to and continue to hope to emulate.

1651: 1647: 1539: 1528: 1484: 1462: 1448: 1430: 1421: 947: 883: 872: 841:

First off, I know little about sports, but your nephew will need to meet our

363: 348: 311: 42: 11658:

I am unclear on which existing article you now say you were editing. Was it

11652: 10849:. This allows communities to quickly respond to spamming by automated bots. 10269:

Some logged-in editors were briefly unable to edit or load pages last week.

7165:

is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the

3227:

is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with

2213:, and other pages within the same book talk about Maxon, too. Then there's 656:

Note: The vibes are winter solsticey. If you're in the southern hemisphere,

568:

On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

12558:

and be prepared to justify your edit if challenged or reverted. Good luck!

12539: 12527: 12199: 12153: 12031: 11569:

Do you remember the article title; whether you submitted it as a draft for

10921: 10885:

among other duties. Nominations will remain open until at least 2024-08-26.

10203: 9348: 9340: 8182: 7897: 7837: 7833: 7811: 7797: 7785: 7749: 7725: 7704: 7695: 7671: 7257: 6907: 6663: 6507: 6348: 6007: 5731: 5695: 5691: 5682: 5370:

The notice "Language links are at the top of the page" that appears in the

5012: 4961:". I am not familiar with that word as either a term or as an article page. 3871: 3462: 3213:

Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the

3172: 2921: 2877: 2708: 2690:

it’s ready to be reviewed and put into the main part of this encyclopaedia.

2683: 2670: 2480: 2320: 2311:

There are millions of musicians in the worlds, and only those who meet our

2082: 1886: 1849: 1636: 1543: 1015: 893: 875:

notice to your userpage. See the instructions on that link on how to do it.

489: 449: 294: 274: 270: 236: 10602:

This platform if not intended for you to create an article about yourself!

7758:

is no rush on Knowledge, so wait some while for a reply (days not hours!).

6205:

Thank you for your advice! I will make the proper changes and disclosures.

5398: 4730: 4528: 3870:

be based up reliable, published sources not connected to the subject (see

2242: 1270:, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: 1014:

I'm away for a few days now, so if you still have problems, do ask at the

12135: 11577: 11203: 11009:

Well, good luck with that. It sounds like the start of a great adventure.

10857:

can now specify if global blocks should prevent account creation. Before

9882: 9817:

this and 21 other community-submitted tasks that were completed last week

9292: 7169:. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. 6876:

The likelihood that they are retained as newcomers (+24.3% over baseline)

6378:

them by checking and criticising every they then make for no good reason.

6237: 5610: 5016: 4873: 4204: 4094:. Only tools that have asked for extension are still running on the grid. 3889: 3608: 3544: 3317: 3237:. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. 2881: 2609: 2301: 2195:

which is our community's way of deciding if an article should stay or go.

1975: 1890: 1819: 1815: 1769: 1667: 10889: 10202:

in the eyes of Knowledge. Only when two or three major, independent and

10198:

Hi there. I published my first book ten years ago! That doesn't make me

9933:

Later this week, Wikimedia site users will notice that the Interface of

9211: 8423: 6303:

On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

5969: 3923:

Please let me know if you find this reply helpful. Regards from the UK,

644: 528: 238: 12428:

to determine what needs to be changed. It is possible to use the newer

8341: 7724:

but instead want to see edits based on reliably published sources. See

6662:. It's important to support any factual statement with a citation to a 6100:

if you want your wiki to be part of the next deployment of Edit check.

5836:, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve 5694:. It's important to support any factual statement with a citation to a 3627:

You can find a 'wizard' tool to help you create a draft article at our

9635:

I hope these help. Let mw know if you need anything further. Regards,

8168:

Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time

1349:

is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the

705: 410: 10814: 10789: 10229:. Nor is it ever a good idea to try to crate one about yourself. See 10081:

August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315

9665:

to get notified about new project updates and other news about Chart.

5609:

But, most important, is the need for every topic to meet Knowledge's

3188:

of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically

2796: 2404:? If so, do you have published sources that demonstrate he meets our 2300:. Thanks for your question. Because Knowledge is an encyclopaedia of 712: 617: 263: 12453:. This is a planned datacenter switchover for maintenance purposes. 11589: 9983:

Come share your ideas for improving the wikis on the newly reopened

9366:

familiar with myself, despite 13 years of editing experience here!).

9359: 9172: 9090: 8997: 8894: 8759: 8453: 8327: 8038: 7971:

There will be many pages here already about abuse of women, such as

7492: 7365: 6452: 6306:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

6132: 5914: 5445: 5193: 4816: 4073: 3780: 3189: 871:

As you are closely connected to him as a relative, you should add a

571:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

11390: 11327:

September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317

10719:

Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via

9954:

Wikimedia site users can now submit account vanishing requests via

8015:

option for users to copy their caption into the media description.

5464: 5420:

is an interface to interactively browse a page's history. Users in

4988: 234: 12473:

is available. This edition includes details about: research about

12310: 10310: 9673:

status and how to request this extension for your wiki, visit the

1978:

what is stated is actually correct, according to the cited source.

12113:. I don't know either series. But looking at Tess in the article 12039:

reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.

10744: 10314: 9196: 8109: 7862: 3701:

For adding citations with our powerful Source Editor, please see

2277: 2033: 1535: 892:

I hope this helps. Feel free to ask further questions, or ask at

729:

January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296

24: 11529:

Community Configuration - Shaping On-Wiki Functionality Together

11117:

changes or by moving pages whose titles on Knowledge start with

8715:

changed last week. In places where Parsoid previously added the

7550:) are being dropped soon. Users must use two columns of the new 6777:

Thank you for all your assistance Nick. It is much appreciated.

2858:. I will leave a corresponding notice for you on your talk page. 12550:, as we take this encyclopaedia and its content very seriously. 11251: 10297:

read details about these and other improvements in this summary

6291: 3746: 3478: 3474: 556: 12450: 12381:

a configuration change to display them in alphabetical order.

9049:

July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313

8126:

June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310

7327:. More information on how styles can be disabled can be found 5452: 4756:

is completed. If you encounter any issues, please indicate in

239: 12458: 12443: 12382: 12372: 12363: 12320: 12285: 12277: 12256: 12254: 11659: 11477: 11079: 10899: 10489: 10487: 10320: 9959: 9950: 9851: 9765:

Wikimedia developers can now officially continue to use both

9228: 9221: 9191: 9176: 9166: 9157: 9013: 8977: 8962: 8957: 8929: 8921: 8916:

when Reference Check was shown to people. Reference Check is

8874: 8852: 8839: 8837: 8820: 8739: 8682: 8433: 8335: 8018: 7874:

Hello, Nick Moyes. Please check your email; you've got mail!

7625: 7623: 7521: 7509: 7472: 7459: 7435: 7422: 7402: 7372: 7332: 7314: 7312: 6606:

attempt to develop it as it would be liable for deletion per

6474: 6425: 6143: 6112: 6103: 6101: 6081:. This was the #8 wish in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. 5894: 5456: 5425: 5411: 5388: 5375: 5230: 5222: 5213: 5204: 4826: 4796: 4726: 4308:

No, absolutely not - sorry. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia of

4112: 4053: 4020: 3744: 3634:

You should read and work through any links to other pages at

2754:

February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298

12546:

belt. Be prepared to have any nonsense or poor quality edit

12499:

Co-Creating a Sustainable Future for the Toolforge Ecosystem

12005: 11894: 11125:), but it may have failed for some pages, and moved them to 11105: 11103: 10850: 10712:

may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may

10687: 9454: 8802: 8570:

has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in

8541: 8010: 7123:(13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as 7077: 6791:...and that's your tenth edit. You are now 'autoconfirmed'! 5750: 4791: 4458: 3097: 1098: 12442:), but using locally defined onwiki classes would be best. 12418:

Any pages or tools that still use the very old CSS classes

11805:

Further advice on creating your first article can be found

10893: 9215: 8427: 8401: 5507:

No worries, I just wanted to make sure you got the message.

2854:. You will need to request a name change - instructions at 2528:

Thank you so much for you help. We will re-do the page now.

1008: 11467:

share your opinions and questions on the project talk page

9848:

share your opinions and questions on the project talk page

9195:

Editors interested in language issues that are related to

8786: 8732: 2800:

can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

1900:). Your request should be clear and explicit. i.e. change 1845:, or be about yourself (unless you're notable, of course!) 1681:

Does this make sense, or have I missed anything? Regards,

1290: 11543:

platform evolution, stewardship and developer experiences

11513:

for more details, and a list of past projects since 2013.

9965:

A Diff blog post on Patrolling features in the Mobile App

5278:

If you know the person in some way, you must declare any

4586:, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 2258:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your 9749:

help us to improve Tech News by taking this short survey

9729:

help us to improve Tech News by taking this short survey

9236:

help us to improve Tech News by taking this short survey

8952:

accessibility. You can share your comments or questions

8913: 4869:. Sorry for the delay in replying. Welcome to Knowledge. 4024:

There are changes to how user and site scripts load for

845:, or notability criteria for this particular sport (see 12403:. Those databases have always been accessible to every 10920:

No, sorry. That domain is a website with no value as a

10553:

key sessions related to the product and technology area

8727:

class for better compatibility with the legacy parser.

4957:

Sorry, but I do not understand your question. What is "

1308: 11842:

for ideas on improving articles related to this topic.

10457:

Two new parser functions will be available this week:

10330:

in São Paulo, Brazil which helps to reduce load times.

10295:

Pppery), and fixes for many edge-case errors. You can

10004:

by WMF staff Johan Jönsson highlights the work of the

7291:

Example of a talk page with the new design, in French.

7179:

Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C)

6943:

for naming and reusing a citation with Source Editor.

6175:

Our notability criteria for academics can be found at

5982:

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself

4880:, which we do not permit. It absolutely must meet our 4844:) or turn on Parsoid read views in your user options ( 3877:

be written in a neutral tone of voice, and written in

3199:

Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C)

2984:

You can switch back and forth between the two editors.

2785:

Please let other wikiprojects know about our February

2415:. Just let me know if you need anything more specific. 2307:

Every single topic that is on Knowledge must meet our

1284: 12455:

This maintenance process also targets other services.

9941:. The FlaggedRevs interface experience on mobile and 9826:

dark mode will be available on a number of Wikipedias

9709:

The Trust and Safety Product team wants to introduce

7395:

progressive deployment of this tool to all Wikipedias

6688:

for naming and reusing a citation with Source Editor.

6555:

Put simply: Knowledge is not here for advertising or

6184:

those which already have coverage here on Knowledge.)

6092:. Edit Check is now deployed as a default feature at 3607:

Any new article must be about a topic that meets our

1302: 1278: 318:

until they have more experience of creating content.

11437: