1850:
just reading the web-site what the team really does. I represent a large number of ex-team members who would like to see a correct and onset entry about the team appear in this site. Unless we can work together and produce a neutral entry based on my evidence and you knowledge of
Knowledge then the whole entry should be deleted. As an example of the incorrect reporting that appears on the web-site, I shall quote a recent example. On the 15th November the team quoted that they were called to search in the vicinity of Throxenby Mere for a lady believed to be at risk after having been reported missing from home the previous day. The lady was found and transported to Scarborough Hospital via the RAF Seaking helicopter. The truth is that the coastguard team were tasked after being requested by the Police to search for a missing 70 year old female who had not been seen since the previous day. The team initially searched from the Sea Life Centre to Coffee pot corner including the Open Air Theatre and Peasholm Park. After new information was received a missing persons profile was able to be carried out and the team moved their search to Inland to Raincliffe Woods. The casualty was located in the woods and was found to have low levels of consciousness and hypothermia. The casualty was airlifted from the woods by Rescue Helicopter 128 and taken to Hospital. The team stood down at 1100 hrs after searching for 6 1/2 hours. This is from the following web-site
2188:
31:
1574:
Yorkshire articles with a few in West & South
Yorkshire. I think you can get a bot to go round tagging articles, but better to at least cast an eye over them and fix up a few basic things as you tag & assess them. I think the main problem of tagging is the movement of articles between categories, which has been happening a lot recently, and that causes articles to be missed or wastes time looking at an article you have already visited.
807:
of the day print. Although I can't help thinking that the vote concerning this policy was skewed by those of a younger online generation that have been fed a diet of post-1974 geography (me actually being one of them). I will endeavour to update the relevant text in the articles and add categories like "History of
Yorkshire (which is already listed in one article) etc instead.
780:, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at
364:, wouldn't you agree that, for example, Jennifer Connelly or Salma Hayek or similiar are "attractive", "gorgeous" etc, and that this is information about them which is pertinentĀ ? As opposed to Joan Hackett, Kathy Bates, Judi Dench or other "character" actressesĀ ? Somebody who'd never seen a picture of the person in question is
1095:
1668:
You are right; I came across the dab page doing short page patrolling and it was red link central, so I tried to create something rather than just have a dab among redlinks. So, grabbing my Ekwall a source from 1964 - found one in West Riding
Yorkshire. Alas, it went to Lancashire in 1974. So I'll do
1563:
page, but I probably missed some as that wasn't my focus. I suppose there must be a way to list all articles which are within
Yorkshire hierarchies of categories but not yet tagged for WPY? I was a bit surprised to find so many not tagged, though a lot of them, perhaps most, are pretty basic stubs.
1377:
Do you think we should ask him to desist? A lot of his edits seem to be doing more harm than good to the category structure. I mean surely visitor attractions in
Harrogate should only apply to things in the town of Harrogate, not everything within an undefined proximity of Harrogate, and the same for
1032:
Thanks - for letting me know, I spotted it from a change to the road list article. Looks like it could be a start now - but that means I will have to add some comments!! Struggling to get things tagged and rated as I appear to be the only one doing any rating. Decided to only tag an article if I rate
368:
of this fact by the use of these informative adjectives. They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but in reality, poll after poll of public opinion shows one can objectively state "This person is attractive". Secondly is there a guide for beginning
Editors to "The Rules" of KnowledgeĀ ? Thanks.
1234:
The reason for removing as vandalism is that the entry appears to be a list of non-notable people with no assertion of why they should be mentioned. If you think that the people are notable then provide citation as to how they are notable or create articles for them that pass the notability criteria
1204:
I am curious as to why you regard my attempts to inform others of interesting local trivia in the 'Modern
Kenilworth' portion of the article as test editing or vandalism. If citation is needed to stop my edits being removed, I will gladly provide it, although I am unsure of the kind of citation that
806:
Hi, I agree to remove the geo-stubs from the area, towns & villages that are now in
Lancashire following previous administrative county boundary changes. Having read a bit about Wiki policy on this, it seems that the consensus was to follow whatever the current Govt changes are and what the maps
242:
Had a good break, but all good things come to an end. This will be the first GA nomination I have done but will give it a go, I think it takes about a week to get someone to assess it. Hopefully they will not find too many problems with it! Thanks for all the work you have put in, like the interior
186:
I felt that the 2 sites were substantially the same thing. The idea of external links is to give more information about the subject of the article and not to promote groups that are based in the location. For example if the site gave a detailed history of Hessle or the features of the town then that
1887:
I have removed the reference to the incidents list, as I dispute the content of this list. As you can see from the example above they have listed an incident in which another organisation carried out the search and rescue. Therefore the incident list can not be trusted and I feel that it should not
1629:
Thanks for the note, I reverted their edits as they had just added links to each of the pubs mentioned which made it become a directory. Would be good if we can get some other editors to contribute as it seems like a 2 man band at the moment. Even the original person who ask about GA status has not
1618:
thanking him for his contribution and encouraging him to read the Hull article's talk page for the good article discussion and encouraging him to provide reliable sources for the material he's added, with pointers to the RS, OR, citing RS, citation template, and MoS pages, and asking him to respond
1988:
I visited the page after an vandal edit had been made and removed an external link that was irrelevant to the content of the article. If you check my hisotry you'll see that I've edited this article constructively in the past and discussed these changes with other editors. I checked the version to
1849:
Keith D, can you please stop changing the entry on the
Scarborough and Ryedale Mountain Rescue Team. The web-site you have used for the current version is incorrect and has been written from a biased point of view within the team As you live many miles away from the team you cannot understand from
1573:
Hi, I had spotted the newly tagged articles as the BOT has just run to update the statistics. I was trying to assess as I tagged, rather than tag all then have a large number to assess which I found was rather depressing. Currently I have tagged the East Riding of Yorkshire & most of the North
267:
Very good! I look forward to the result; seems a good collaborative effort on a worthy topic. :o) My concern is the large number of sources from the official stadium website. It really does seem the best source of information, but the stricture on "third-party" (unrelated) sources might blight the
1876:
for details. Please try to improve the article and maintain its structure from a neutral point of view, as I feel that it is something that is worthy of an article. All of the editors involved have to work together to produce an article that is worthy of a place here, hopefully we can all work to
1866:
I reverted the edits you made as they removed all of the wikification from the page and the work of other editors from the article. Apart from that I have had little actual input into the content, all I have done is the basic adding of categories and minor wikification. As you rightly point out I
1639:
That's very true, and I've not been able to contribute as much as I want to lately, but today should be another good day to give it a go. I saw your reversion of his first edit on the pub links and agree with that. He's since made what appears to be a good faith attempt to expand the section, but
517:
1562:
Hi Keith: As you'll have spotted, I spent some time today adding GENUKI ext links to all the places listed in the "Leeds environs" category, and a few other places which were in the same ancient parishes. When I noticed a page wasn't already tagged with WPYorks, I added the template to the talk
716:
article a bit too to incorporate the new source there. That article also covers the original theory. I ended up only citing the link you provided and its theory as it's a far better source than the first; let the reader follow the wiklink to the syphilis article to see the whole debate in better
1584:
I was thinking that the CAT scan tool could be used when we have got most of the articles tagged to pick up the missed ones. Though I do not know if it looks at talk pages to get templates so may not be usable. If it does not operate on talk page templates then will have to investigate how the
152:
Keith. I can understand why the forum link was deleted as its excluded under rule 10 of links to be avoided. However i do not understand why rule was used as justification for deleting the general website link? Hessle Community Action is a residents group which is run by residents and follows
985:
Keith D, I deleted the original thatcher image because i disagreed with it {black & white) to replace it with a more suitable. Upon realising the jpg was copyrighted and thus unable to upload, i left the article. I cannot replace the original thatcher because i dont know it's name.
673:
is given to it in the article on Hull; currently, about 14% of the history section by word count is about the syphilis issue. I'd think it's better suited to the syphilis article (which I've not yet checked, I must admit), with perhaps a passing mention in the Hull article.
833:
Thanks for that - I was going to suggest that you seek a wider consensus on that matter. I am just following what is the policy, I would probably go for pre 1974 counties as that is what I was brought up with, never liked the Humberside we slipped into for a short while!
2008:
that I had removed. Unsure what actions you have taken as I cannot come up with any thing that would have achieved that action. My best though was that you were comparing selected versions then did an undo which just removed the latest version rather than the set.
472:
Thanks for the copyediting: I hadn't realised there were redirects in place for all major roads, so that's particularly useful. I realise that it's probably too early to try for GA as the article can't be claimed to be "stable", but thought I'd give it a whirl!
932:
template and given some more detail in the reference. Unsure why the link from the page got back to the article but things appear to work with the URL I have put in. The quotes are from the Introduction text but looks like this was written by someone else.
1640:
he's not adding any sources. I hope the note on his talk page helps prompt him to do so; the last thing we need is more material that needs citation. Maybe he'll get the hang of it and help us out with the rest of the article too. Hope springs eternal...
1074:
I have left it as a stub for the moment - certainly better than before. I have left a couple of thoughts on the comments page but cannot think of what else can be said about it. I have added the caves wikiproject tag on to it as they may have some input.
575:
No problem - I was wondering about the Ofsted report comments as I could not find any reference for it and the Ofsted link on the page appears to be incorrect. I did locate a report and was going to put it in but have not got round to it as yet.
1918:
Hi Keith D. Just a note, but I mean what I said at your RfA. Assuming it passes I'd be happy to help in any areas you're unsure about with the tools. With your excellent experience in other areas there shouldn't be a problem for you. I'm from
1817:
No, your user page indicated that you are new around here and the blank talk page with only removes of image messages looked at first glance as you were newish. Sorry if I offended you looks like I got it wrong but then we all make mistakes.
1046:
Spotted you had used the convert template in article - not sure about the use of that one, a bot has been running round recently removing it indicating that it was a bloated template. Though there is no note on the template or its talk page.
1783:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
452:
A gripe of mine is people rating articles above a stub and not leaving any comments as to what they think needs doing. If they have rated it then they must know what needs doing to move it forward. But then that is another can of worms.
1350:
Just for info the same user has been doing similar in West Yorkshire with Leeds, Bradford etc. and its driving me crazy trying to tag articles as I keep hitting the same articles as they have changed category since I last looked.
656:
May be it should remain but the source looks like it could be questioned. I have had a look round and found similar material by the Independent newspaper which could be used as a more reliable source. Take a look at
646:, as it's simply an essay with no author and no sources of its own listed (I'm also suspicious of the "powered by Knowledge" notice at the bottom of the page). What do you think? Should this material remain? Thanks.
1744:
Do not know if I know enough about all of the policies but from the side of helping out with vandalism then I think I would give it a go. Thanks for the vote of confidence, will have to see what other people think.
1302:
901:
the web page offers "Table of Contents for this work" but the link takes one to wikipedia not to contents. Also noticed is that the long quotes referred to seem to be in the author's introduction not the preface.
1170:
On the award - pretty much every time I check a settlement's edit history I see your name as a vandalism reverter! Great to know we still have some guardians out there! You really earned the award. Thanks again,
192:
The spam in the summary line is just a quick way of indicating that the links were not acceptable. The summary line is just that a quick summary so people can note what has happened. It was not an attack on the
1156:
No problem - if there are any issues with the map, or you feel an article could be improved with a different map do please let me know. There are just 15 counties of England left to map out now for the
1314:
1306:
885:
I used the parenthetical in text citation of (Bartlett) thinking it would help the flow but after seeing that you kept the reference it seems better. Thanks for your quality help. I used the site:
596:
I have also changed the link at the bottom as the original one pointed to something unrelated to the school but I could not work out what it was for, possibly a nursery attached to the school.
1989:
which you refer, somehow those vandal edits were attributed to me. I did not make them, and don't know how I was signed to them. If you have any idea how this might happen please let me know!
216:
article a bit today. I am ready to try for GA if you are. Have you done this before? I'm sure I can research it and do it, but if you're more familiar with the process, feel free. Cheers.
1347:
Unsure on this one but seems you have to have some knowledge of the area to navigate round the category tree and looks a bit of overkill. What do other counties do for their settlements?
492:
Good to see that some articles are moving forward - I have come across far to many stubs tagging/rating the Yorkshire articles and have only done East so far, North is now in progress.
586:
Yes, I have noticedthat. The link at the bottom of the page appears to be the actual report itself, whereas the number you posted is for the same report, but a different section
1872:
If you wish to correct the article then you are free to improve it but you must be aware of the potential conflict of interest that edits you make to the article may have, see
1528:
153:
residents wishes via a voting procedure and has a full consituation as well as been supported by Alan Johnson MP. I beleive therefore that it is relevant to the towns page.
1507:
You could include that comment but would need to find a current citation as the link you quote is 2005 so cannot be used to substantiate something that happened this year.
1579:
Just for information I have not been tagging railway stations, schools or people articles on this pass as there are too many of them and are covered by other projects.
1462:
1338:
738:
Thank you for yoru tireless work in clearing up the elaborate vandalism to the Kings College of the Arts and Technology page and reverting it to an accurate version.
380:
170:
114:
100:
Its a community group assisting local people with issues including the recent flooding and is a very helpful resource for people, yet you labelled it as "spam". Why?
1524:
1022:
Keith - you got there before I'd finished (I was going to give it a WPYorks template, of course!). You might like to look again - I reckon it's no longer a stub.
1679:
Thanks for confirming that, I will have a look at it some time when I get back to tag it as it should probably come under the History of Yorkshire category now.
207:
2005:
1898:
Thanks for the note - I think that it is best not to use the reference as it is disputed, but to find other more reliable references to support the article.
1215:
166:
110:
1726:
Thanks I will have a look at that. I will be away next week so not a good time to have ask. Give me a prod when I am back and I will have a think about it.
563:'s page. Knowledge is public-edited, and as such, I tend to think of you as the police, dealing with those idiotic vandalsĀ :) Well thats all, thanks again,
440:
It just gets to me to see how many articles I randomly checked in the UK and english project area havent been tagged at all - either articles or categories
1945:
Many thanks for the offer. We all have to start as the new boy on the block at some point and assistance would be appreciated certainly in the early days.
1844:
1294:
268:
effort. I guess we'll see. Thanks though, whatever the outcome, I learned a few things about style and the Knowledge process working with you on this. :o)
236:
1867:
have no personal knowledge of the organisation but am just keeping an eye on all Yorkshire articles to ensure they are being improved and not vandalised.
1601:
1487:
997:
Thanks for letting me know - I spotted the image had gone and restored it back. If you can locate a better free image then you are welcome to upload it.
814:
1424:
1399:
1355:
784:- please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first!
776:, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Knowledge, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at
384:
1892:
1860:
1551:
1001:
1536:
2122:
826:
2136:
1683:
1243:
974:
407:
201:
146:
1368:
Think this is going over the top as it is making things much more difficult to locate and making lots of categories with few articles in them.
1298:
1511:
1287:
838:
1499:
324:
156:
Also why was any of the links labeled as "spam"? HCARA is a regonised organisation and I object to the idea that we were "spamming" anybody.
600:
580:
1990:
1889:
1857:
1653:
1644:
1634:
1458:
1395:
1334:
1283:
937:
777:
721:
695:
678:
664:
355:
320:
Done those that are obvious which one is meant. Left rest for someone who knows the subject matter to determine which article to point to.
288:
249:
457:
447:
435:
2079:
1749:
1739:
1730:
1721:
1708:
1372:
1051:
855:
801:
349:
262:
1822:
97:
Keith. Why did you remove the Hessle Community Action Residents Association links in the external links section of the Hessle article?
2174:
2057:
2013:
1907:
1881:
1476:
However some people still experience poor after sales service from Comet. See the link below "Don't Buy from Comet" for more details.
1186:
1137:
1589:
1079:
1037:
796:
501:
1972:
963:
2104:
1420:
Would be a good idea to drop him a note and to set up a discussion about the categorisation before we end-up too far down the road.
1064:
This has moved on from "stub" - you might like to reassess? (I followed a link from Yorkshire Museum and got a bit carried away...)
1011:
990:
669:
Cheers, definitely a better quality source. I'll use that, but I believe I'm going to trim down the discussion a bit. I do believe
1779:
691:
A trim would be best as we are staying in the one article and not doing a subsidiary article on the History of Hull at the moment.
1227:
610:
590:
569:
2032:
2026:
1532:
1468:
1802:
i just like to know why would you put a welcome message on my talk page would i've been edit this thing for about 2 years now..
868:
Thanks Keith, its all a bit beyond me if i'm honest!! The station launched yesterday and has gone on air with a different name.
483:
Good idea to nominate early as it can take up to a couple of weeks to get through the review process - as I found out with the
1673:
753:
650:
634:
Keith, I've been working on sourcing the history section of the Hull article, and I'm up to a section that might be putting
2019:
1438:
1223:
955:
759:
745:
376:
178:
174:
122:
118:
1623:
1604:
606:
How odd, there is no nursery attached to the school, it is a secondary school. I guess that mystery will remain unsolved
1495:
906:
892:
822:
477:
1567:
535:
339:
1998:
1649:
I had not spotted the more recent edits but they look OK, its going to be a difficult section to write & source.
872:
763:
1791:
425:
1770:
1714:
1454:
1391:
1330:
1279:
1068:
624:
314:
1939:
1255:
1254:
Hi, I've seen your efforts at improving North Yorkshire related articles, and I was wondering what you think of
1517:
The date on the top of the link is when the page was started - there are multiple entries from 2006 and 2007.
1249:
554:
487:
review. But it can take as little as 20 minutes as it did for 1 article that I spotted while watching the page.
2159:
1698:
712:
Upon further reading, the new source advanced a theory a bit different from the first. I ended up editing the
360:
Hi Keith D. I see you removed my "gorgeous" adjective from the page. As the purpose of an encyclopaedia is to
2024:
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the
943:
848:
1124:
670:
345:
Looks like they are just disruptive edits - heading for a ban from what I have seen of the POV on articles.
1839:
1811:
1473:
You removed my original comment as you said that it was too personal, would the following be acceptableĀ ?
1026:
2238:
2233:
2228:
2216:
1856:
I can quote many other incidents reported by the team, in which the rescue or search was done by others.
1694:
Hi. I'd like to nominate you as an admin, as I think you're qualified. Let me know if you're interested.
1442:
1379:
1318:
1267:
81:
76:
71:
59:
2195:
2038:
1196:
399:
and linked documents. See also welcome message at top of this page for other links which may be useful.
38:
1109:
Awarded for your tireless efforts to remove nonsense and vandalism from British settlement articles!
980:
629:
467:
559:
Well hello there Keith, once again, thank you for your tireless efforts removing petty vandalism on
531:
To Keith D, for your tireless work creating, editing and improving Knowledge's coverage of Britain.
1557:
1219:
959:
749:
1258:, most of the things in there have been just taken out of Geography of North Yorks. The same guy (
2118:
2004:
I can see the link you intended to remove but what ever you did reintroduced the vandalism from
2132:
1980:
1609:
1491:
1008:
987:
818:
1142:
Also thanks for the East Riding of Yorkshire map that has appeared in the infoboxes recently.
1663:
1059:
733:
330:
309:
1717:, and you'd then have to answer various questions and address any concerns users may have.
1520:
1483:
1211:
951:
877:
810:
741:
372:
162:
106:
418:
was that the uk project and any of its subsidiary projects could do with a bit of tagging
8:
2170:
2089:
2053:
2043:
1913:
1670:
1595:
658:
280:
228:
92:
2084:
Thanks for letting me know - I will be taking things slowly, mop & bucket on order!
2114:
2036:
if you haven't read those already. Also, some have found the practice exercises at the
1851:
1788:
1263:
926:
863:
790:
639:
621:
444:
422:
413:
431:
Thanks - for information I am working on the Yorkshire project tagging at the moment.
2204:
2128:
1950:
1903:
1774:
1615:
916:
560:
532:
392:
47:
17:
1777:
to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at
1835:
507:
306:
2143:
2072:
1994:
1965:
1932:
1310:
781:
772:
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at
607:
587:
566:
2203:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
620:
Thanks for your support, and I've added a link to the main article to the lead.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2100:
2048:
1641:
1620:
903:
889:
869:
773:
718:
675:
647:
298:
270:
218:
1873:
1689:
1236:
1085:
785:
635:
441:
419:
396:
1669:
a little clean up but please check to see if I've got it right. Good catch!
258:
That was easy - it is in the list - just have to wait and see what happens.
2166:
2085:
2010:
1946:
1899:
1878:
1819:
1764:
1746:
1736:
1727:
1718:
1705:
1695:
1680:
1650:
1631:
1586:
1548:
1544:
1508:
1421:
1369:
1352:
1259:
1240:
1143:
1134:
1076:
1048:
1034:
1017:
998:
971:
934:
898:
852:
835:
692:
661:
643:
615:
597:
577:
545:
498:
454:
432:
404:
346:
336:
321:
259:
246:
198:
143:
135:
1831:
1828:
no i was not upset just thought you might have meant it for someone else
1808:
1094:
2149:
2066:
1959:
1926:
1797:
1262:)has been nicking things out of other categories and putting them into
1181:
1174:
1119:
1112:
886:
484:
213:
2096:
1920:
1735:
Hi. Just a quick note to say the offer's still open if you're ready.
1564:
1065:
1023:
474:
130:
The links were removed as they fail on several counts of the section
1956:
You're welcome. Let me know. I certainly hope the RfA passes. Best.
1543:
But they are only user added comments and are thus discounted under
516:
970:
You are going to have to explain that one it makes no sense to me.
713:
897:
Hi again just wanted you to look at reference links 2, 3, & 4
395:. For information on the rules for structure, layout etc see the
638:
on syphilis. Even if the weight is not undue, I'm not sure that
1547:
as anyone can write anything there and are in no way reliable.
299:
1787:
Go for it!! Knowledge needs level headed people like you!!!--
391:
The word falls into the category of the words to avoid see
1619:
on his talk page, my talk page, or the article talk page.
212:
Hello Keith, hope you enjoyed your hols. I worked on the
2042:
useful. If you have any questions drop me a message at
1033:
it now so we do not get swamped with articles to rate.
948:
and thus the Norrington Table is *bound* to be wrong!
2165:
No problem - looks like the block button in a minute.
1767:
would like to nominate you to become an administrator.
1852:
http://www.scarboroughcoastguard.co.uk/Incidents.htm
1295:
Category:Buildings and structures in North Yorkshire
2148:For reverting the vandalism on my user page. --
1303:Category:Visitor attractions in North Yorkshire
208:KC Stadium: Ready to nominate for Good Article?
2063:Well done. Offer stands if you need any help.
1923:so we're in the same time zone. Best of luck!
1299:Category:Buildings and structures in Harrogate
1845:Scarborough and Ryedale Mountain Rescue Team
778:Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals
1773:to see what this process entails, and then
1600:I apologise for my useless contribution.
1315:Category:Visitor attractions in Harrogate
1307:Category:Visitor attractions in Harrogate
1092:
514:
1780:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Keith D
1437:See my comments on his userpage and on
1205:would suffice in this particular case.
335:What do you reckon about this user? --
14:
2201:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1309:. I'm really not sure that stuff like
660:to see if that could be used instead.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2182:
1439:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Yorkshire
356:Wakefield Trivia section POV removal
25:
1378:the other categories he's filling.
802:North Yorkshire/Yorkshire-geo-stubs
305:You'll have to fix incoming links!
23:
1479:(The link is already on the page)
24:
2252:
1103:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
2186:
1771:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1715:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1093:
515:
497:Thanks for all the work put in.
29:
1805:was it meant for someone else.
1469:Comet Group after sales service
1256:Category:Geography of Harrogate
1713:I'd set up your nomination at
797:01:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
754:12:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
722:21:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
696:20:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
679:20:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
665:20:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
651:19:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
625:22:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
611:17:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
601:13:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
591:11:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
581:15:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
570:15:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
536:13:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
502:10:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
478:10:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
458:15:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
448:12:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
436:12:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
426:12:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
408:09:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
385:00:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
13:
1:
2175:23:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
2160:23:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
2137:17:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
2123:08:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
2105:00:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
2080:23:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
2058:23:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1731:22:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
1722:15:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
1709:15:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
1699:14:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
1684:10:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
1674:00:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
849:Category:History of Yorkshire
350:14:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
340:13:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
325:21:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
315:21:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
289:22:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
263:21:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
250:20:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
237:20:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
2033:administrators' reading list
2027:administrators' how-to guide
2020:You are now an administrator
2014:15:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
1999:14:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
1973:14:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
1940:13:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
1908:21:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1893:16:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1882:00:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1861:23:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
1840:22:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1823:22:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
1812:21:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
1792:15:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1750:14:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1740:14:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1654:14:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
1645:14:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
1635:14:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
1624:14:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
1605:18:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
1590:22:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
1568:22:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
1552:22:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
1537:21:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
1512:18:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
1500:16:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
1463:00:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
1425:23:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1400:23:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1373:23:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1356:23:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1339:23:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1288:23:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1266:. What do you think? Regards
1244:18:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1228:16:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1187:15:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1138:12:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1125:11:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1080:19:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1069:14:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1052:13:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
1038:13:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
1027:13:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
1012:14:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1002:14:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
991:14:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
132:Links normally to be avoided
7:
1235:for entry in the wiki. See
975:20:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
964:20:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
938:18:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
907:16:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
893:15:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
873:15:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
856:19:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
839:18:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
827:15:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
202:08:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
179:09:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
147:11:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
123:12:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
10:
2257:
847:I had forgotten about the
243:photo you mannaged to get.
187:link would normally be OK.
2113:Great stuff. Well done!--
1704:What would this involve?
1239:for criteria for people.
1099:
521:
764:Warwickshire-school-stub
1762:
1630:contributed any thing.
1614:I've left a message on
1250:Geography of Harrogate
555:I despair, I really do
2199:of past discussions.
1585:tagging bot does it.
944:The House Always Wins
525:The Original Barnstar
42:of past discussions.
1317:its just confusing.
1293:He is also emptying
912:I have replaced the
1264:Category:Harrogate
1197:Kenilworth Article
2244:
2243:
2211:
2210:
2205:current talk page
2127:Congratulations.
2095:Congratulations!
2078:
1971:
1938:
1539:
1525:Duncan of Enfield
1523:comment added by
1503:
1486:comment added by
1230:
1214:comment added by
1130:
1129:
1009:Willieboyisaloser
988:Willieboyisaloser
981:Margaret Thatcher
966:
954:comment added by
829:
813:comment added by
793:
756:
744:comment added by
671:too much emphasis
630:Hull and syphilis
561:Hall Cross School
544:Thanks for that.
541:
540:
468:Leeds Country Way
387:
375:comment added by
182:
165:comment added by
126:
109:comment added by
87:
86:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Keith D
2248:
2225:
2213:
2212:
2190:
2189:
2183:
2156:
2155:
2077:
2075:
2064:
2056:
2039:new admin school
1970:
1968:
1957:
1937:
1935:
1924:
1558:Yorkshire places
1518:
1502:
1480:
1451:
1448:
1445:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1276:
1273:
1270:
1209:
1185:
1133:Thanks for that
1123:
1097:
1090:
1089:
949:
931:
925:
922:template with a
921:
915:
808:
791:
768:
762:
739:
519:
512:
511:
370:
312:
287:
284:
279:
274:
235:
232:
227:
222:
181:
159:
125:
103:
68:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2256:
2255:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2221:
2187:
2153:
2151:
2146:
2073:
2065:
2047:
2046:. Best wishes,
2022:
2006:147.252.234.153
1983:
1966:
1958:
1933:
1925:
1916:
1888:be referenced.
1847:
1800:
1784:
1775:contact Epbr123
1692:
1666:
1612:
1598:
1560:
1481:
1471:
1449:
1446:
1443:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1325:
1322:
1319:
1311:Ripon Cathedral
1274:
1271:
1268:
1252:
1199:
1172:
1110:
1088:
1062:
1020:
983:
946:
929:
923:
919:
913:
880:
866:
804:
770:
766:
760:
736:
632:
618:
557:
510:
470:
416:
397:Manual of Style
358:
333:
310:
303:
282:
277:
272:
269:
230:
225:
220:
217:
210:
160:
104:
95:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2254:
2242:
2241:
2236:
2231:
2226:
2219:
2209:
2208:
2191:
2180:
2178:
2177:
2145:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2125:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2016:
1982:
1981:Blackrock page
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1915:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1885:
1884:
1869:
1868:
1846:
1843:
1826:
1825:
1799:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1671:Carlossuarez46
1665:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1611:
1610:Editor Swldxer
1608:
1597:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1575:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1515:
1514:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1348:
1342:
1341:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1216:Colloids quass
1198:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1128:
1127:
1106:
1105:
1100:
1098:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1041:
1040:
1019:
1016:
1005:
1004:
982:
979:
978:
977:
956:129.67.120.144
945:
942:
941:
940:
879:
876:
865:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
842:
841:
803:
800:
774:Knowledge:Stub
769:
758:
746:82.110.222.242
735:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
684:
683:
682:
681:
631:
628:
617:
614:
604:
603:
584:
583:
556:
553:
551:
549:
548:
539:
538:
528:
527:
522:
520:
509:
506:
505:
504:
494:
493:
489:
488:
469:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
415:
412:
411:
410:
401:
400:
377:213.202.139.96
357:
354:
353:
352:
332:
329:
328:
327:
302:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
253:
252:
244:
209:
206:
205:
204:
195:
194:
189:
188:
167:ClarkRobHessle
150:
149:
140:
139:
111:ClarkRobHessle
94:
91:
89:
85:
84:
79:
74:
69:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2253:
2240:
2237:
2235:
2232:
2230:
2227:
2224:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2214:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2192:
2185:
2184:
2181:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2158:
2157:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2115:Harkey Lodger
2112:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2093:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2076:
2070:
2069:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2055:
2052:
2051:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2029:
2028:
2015:
2012:
2007:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1986:
1974:
1969:
1963:
1962:
1955:
1954:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1936:
1930:
1929:
1922:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1891:
1883:
1880:
1875:
1871:
1870:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1859:
1854:
1853:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1824:
1821:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1806:
1803:
1793:
1790:
1789:Harkey Lodger
1786:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1776:
1772:
1769:Please visit
1768:
1766:
1751:
1748:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1707:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1664:West Bradford
1655:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1633:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1617:
1616:his talk page
1607:
1606:
1603:
1591:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1566:
1553:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1477:
1474:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1440:
1436:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1357:
1354:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1245:
1242:
1238:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1206:
1202:
1188:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1060:Kirkdale Cave
1053:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1003:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
992:
989:
976:
973:
969:
968:
967:
965:
961:
957:
953:
939:
936:
928:
918:
911:
910:
909:
908:
905:
900:
895:
894:
891:
887:
883:
875:
874:
871:
857:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
837:
832:
831:
830:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
799:
798:
795:
794:
787:
783:
779:
775:
765:
757:
755:
751:
747:
743:
734:Kings College
723:
720:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
697:
694:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
680:
677:
672:
668:
667:
666:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
652:
649:
645:
641:
637:
627:
626:
623:
622:Mattythewhite
613:
612:
609:
602:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
582:
579:
574:
573:
572:
571:
568:
564:
562:
552:
547:
543:
542:
537:
534:
530:
529:
526:
523:
518:
513:
503:
500:
496:
495:
491:
490:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
459:
456:
451:
450:
449:
446:
443:
439:
438:
437:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
424:
421:
409:
406:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
382:
378:
374:
367:
363:
351:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
331:User:Humberbr
326:
323:
319:
318:
317:
316:
313:
308:
301:
290:
286:
285:
276:
275:
266:
265:
264:
261:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
248:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
233:
224:
223:
215:
203:
200:
197:
196:
191:
190:
185:
184:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
157:
154:
148:
145:
142:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
101:
98:
90:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2222:
2200:
2194:
2179:
2150:
2147:
2067:
2049:
2044:My talk page
2037:
2031:
2025:
2023:
1987:
1984:
1960:
1927:
1917:
1886:
1855:
1848:
1830:
1827:
1807:
1804:
1801:
1778:
1763:
1693:
1667:
1613:
1602:86.142.64.63
1599:
1561:
1516:
1488:82.35.146.78
1478:
1475:
1472:
1253:
1207:
1203:
1201:Hi Keith D,
1200:
1177:
1115:
1102:
1063:
1021:
1006:
984:
947:
899:Mary Shelley
896:
884:
882:Hi Keith D,
881:
878:Mary Shelley
867:
815:Northernpeak
805:
789:
771:
737:
636:undue weight
633:
619:
605:
585:
565:
558:
550:
524:
471:
417:
365:
361:
359:
334:
304:
281:
271:
229:
219:
211:
158:
155:
151:
131:
102:
99:
96:
88:
65:
43:
37:
2193:This is an
1914:RfA Comment
1596:West Felton
1519:āPreceding
1482:āPreceding
1444:King of the
1381:King of the
1320:King of the
1313:belongs in
1269:King of the
1210:āPreceding
950:āPreceding
809:āPreceding
740:āPreceding
640:this source
371:āPreceding
307:Computerjoe
161:āPreceding
105:āPreceding
93:Hessle CARA
36:This is an
1985:Hi Keith,
864:Seaside FM
608:Mrjingjing
588:Mrjingjing
567:Mrjingjing
485:KC Stadium
414:assumption
393:WP:PEACOCK
273:Doonhamer
221:Doonhamer
214:KC Stadium
2239:ArchiveĀ 5
2234:ArchiveĀ 4
2229:ArchiveĀ 3
2223:ArchiveĀ 2
2217:ArchiveĀ 1
1921:Hampshire
1877:that end.
1642:Doonhamer
1621:Doonhamer
927:Cite book
904:Daytrivia
890:Daytrivia
870:Hullonian
719:Doonhamer
676:Doonhamer
648:Doonhamer
82:ArchiveĀ 5
77:ArchiveĀ 4
72:ArchiveĀ 3
66:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
2030:and the
1533:contribs
1521:unsigned
1496:contribs
1484:unsigned
1224:contribs
1212:unsigned
1208:Thanks
1157:infobox!
1007:Thanks (
952:unsigned
917:cite web
823:contribs
811:unsigned
786:Grutness
782:WP:WSS/D
742:unsigned
717:detail.
714:syphilis
644:reliable
508:Barnstar
373:unsigned
366:informed
175:contribs
163:unsigned
119:contribs
107:unsigned
2196:archive
2167:Keith D
2144:Thanks!
2129:Snowman
2086:Keith D
2011:Keith D
1947:Keith D
1900:Keith D
1879:Keith D
1820:Keith D
1765:Epbr123
1747:Keith D
1737:Epbr123
1728:Keith D
1719:Epbr123
1706:Keith D
1696:Epbr123
1681:Keith D
1651:Keith D
1632:Keith D
1587:Keith D
1549:Keith D
1509:Keith D
1422:Keith D
1370:Keith D
1353:Keith D
1260:DShamen
1241:Keith D
1144:Keith D
1135:Keith D
1077:Keith D
1049:Keith D
1035:Keith D
999:Keith D
972:Keith D
935:Keith D
853:Keith D
836:Keith D
693:Keith D
662:Keith D
598:Keith D
578:Keith D
546:Keith D
533:Snowman
499:Keith D
455:Keith D
433:Keith D
405:Keith D
347:Keith D
337:Rrburke
322:Keith D
311:'s talk
260:Keith D
247:Keith D
199:Keith D
144:Keith D
39:archive
2054:scribe
1874:WP:COI
1832:Nez202
1809:Nez202
1237:WP:BIO
362:inform
300:Marske
283:Banter
231:Banter
193:sites.
2074:Chat
2068:Pedro
1991:AleXd
1967:Chat
1961:Pedro
1934:Chat
1928:Pedro
1890:Sdsrt
1858:Sdsrt
1690:Admin
1545:WP:RS
1447:North
1384:North
1323:North
1305:into
1297:into
1272:North
1175:Jza84
1113:Jza84
1086:Award
136:WP:EL
16:<
2171:talk
2152:Neil
2133:talk
2119:talk
2101:talk
2097:PamD
2090:talk
1995:talk
1951:talk
1904:talk
1836:talk
1565:PamD
1529:talk
1492:talk
1450:East
1387:East
1326:East
1301:and
1275:East
1220:talk
1182:talk
1120:talk
1066:PamD
1024:PamD
1018:A660
960:talk
819:talk
792:wha?
750:talk
616:York
475:PamD
445:Suro
442:Satu
423:Suro
420:Satu
381:talk
171:talk
115:talk
2050:WjB
1173:--
1111:--
888:.
788:...
642:is
134:of
2173:)
2135:)
2121:)
2103:)
2092:)
2071::
1997:)
1964::
1953:)
1931::
1906:)
1838:)
1798:Hi
1535:)
1531:ā¢
1498:)
1494:ā¢
1461:)
1441:,
1398:)
1337:)
1286:)
1226:)
1222:ā¢
1014:)
993:)
962:)
930:}}
924:{{
920:}}
914:{{
851:.
825:)
821:ā¢
767:}}
761:{{
752:)
383:)
177:)
173:ā¢
121:)
117:ā¢
2207:.
2169:(
2154:N
2139:.
2131:(
2117:(
2099:(
2088:(
1993:(
1949:(
1902:(
1834:(
1527:(
1490:(
1459:C
1457:/
1455:T
1453:(
1396:C
1394:/
1392:T
1390:(
1335:C
1333:/
1331:T
1329:(
1284:C
1282:/
1280:T
1278:(
1218:(
1184:)
1180:(
1178:Ā·
1122:)
1118:(
1116:Ā·
986:(
958:(
817:(
748:(
379:(
278:|
226:|
169:(
138:.
113:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.