User talk:JoeLoeb - Knowledge

2110:'How interesting is it that the writer based the character on his college experiences reading Don Quixote in the original 17th century spanish!' We should be focused o nthe real- world content, providing enough plot context to understand it. Really, we could say 'The scarecrow was introduced in this year, by these creators. He usually appears as an antagonist in batman comics, where he uses the exploitation of fears through manipulation of circumstances and a hallucinogenic 'fear drug' to commit crimes and fight the Batman.' and be done. That's about as much of an entry as you'd get from Encyc Brit on a good, kind day. We give much more, and we want to do it well. That's not achieved by describing the plots in detail, but by finding more from Finger and Kane explaining how they created him, what he's about to them, and so on, and finding the same in other creative teams working with the character. 1069:

Nicol). I've seen Charlie's Angels 1 & 2 (don't ask, okay for Drew Barrymore only) and they are to stupid, and over the top. Bale was good except for the Batvoice, Worthington and Yelchin (see above), Carter was so cold as the Dr. Korgen, Common was decent, etc. It's a shame that it "flopped" thanks to Fox's evil NATM2, and Ben Stiller, and he's still the same blasted guy from 5-10 yrs. ago! I also think that Fox pulled strings on RT (Rotten Tomatoes) to derail the movie. As you can see I'm trying to defend this solid film against crazed fanboys and IMDB users. FYI, I'm a Terminator fan from 1991. Oh, and he chose to call himself McG, and i never trust a one name director like

5062: 10037: 2700: 10137: 9977: 9921: 9865: 9635: 5370: 2134: 9685: 1567:

considered the possibility of it being, covertly, the enemy of truth, historicity, or indeed mankind's progression out of the swamps of religion/superstition. And yet therein lies WP's uniqueness and appeal. I suggest devotees of WP cease and desist all such lofty pretensions of "accuracy" and "unbiased-ness", since the very nature of WP's openness goes hand-in-hand with its inevitable penchant for charming, silly, fact-based idiocy.

5659: 3334: 9792: 4850: 1796: 1699: 1618: 1437: 157: 422: 4427: 9450: 9382: 8503: 4006: 3242: 1040:. If you have a problem with the story, then blame the writers, because he didn't write the story. As for his name, how can you criticize someone for a name that was basically given to them at birth because there were too many people with the same name in his family? It isn't like it's a "stage name" or something, it's what everyone has known him by since he was a child. It's like criticizing " 10240: 2776: 2520: 1395: 238: 197: 7888:

Canary, but I won't add them to Arrow, b/c I've been run over by you several times, Jack. And how come Helena is the only one besides Oliver linked to the DC character, don't you mean Helena Bertinelli (Arrow)?? Look I just wanna improve the article, I don't wanna destroy it and I think that if they have characters IN THE BOOKS in the show, THEY SHOULD have it linked their. That's all. (

650:; I go there all the time when I'm wondering something, or have something to tell a larger group of people. I suspect most people would agree with me on this subject, but you never know so give it a shot! :) It's also a good way to get acquainted with the other editors who work on the same sorts of articles that you do, and share information and discuss things in general. 3938:. The sourced cited at the end of that passage does not mention Carrigan's given name. If there is indeed a source in that passage that I've overlooked, please let me know. If you know of a reliable source for this information, please add it to the article if you want to re-add that information, as per the 7595:

I have reverted your wikilinking of various characters int he series to comic book characters in the series. Please stop adding these wikilinks, as we do not have a shred of reliable sources connecting any of them to their comic book counterparts. The tv series takes a great many liberties with comic

5266:

Sorry for opening up the discussion about whether Marcus is the director or not wider than it needed to be. I probably should have asked you first before asking everyone. I incorrectly assumed you were positive he was the new director and I thought we'd need outside opinions since I thought we'd both

858:

I'm not sure what scene you initially saw (I didn't know what she looked like at all before I saw the film), but there is a small piece where she is talking to Marcus on the holograph screen where, as she's changing faces to show him that Skynet is not really Serena but that her face was one he would

393:

No problem. To answer your question, I've basically been a fan since the X-Men Animated Series came out back in the early 90s. The first comic I bought was Wolverine #75 in November 1993. I'm answering here because it's probably best if I remove your response in the Wolverine discussion page. I'm not

2109:

It doesn't 'blow'... believe me, I know on-wiki situations that blow. This is an easy one. Fiction articles are easy to fix, techinically speaking, but hard to do when you're a fan of the work. Remember, the wiki articles aren't about 'how cool it was when character did this thing or that thing' but

1068:

I didn't say I hated the film. It's alot better then that shit Fox TV show, and tame T3, because this actually tries something different. 2 things are off: Nichol and Writers (Not Jonathan Nolan). The writers are from Catwoman, enough said and McG (sorry about the name, he could have been called Joe

7625:

Solid references?? You're joking right?? Do you know any other Roy Harper in the DCU, how about any other Dinah Lance, it's ludicrous, they are the characters. Liberties taken mind you but still the characters, hence Merlyn is completely re-invented for the show, but I digress But I know you have a

5676:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

1916:

It was sloppy to begin with. What do you mean by downplay? Knowledge is not a fansite. Scarecrow's other appearances are still there, in the publication section; and the images I removed because they don't really add anything. And no, I have not edited Deadpool (yet), but that article is an example

1842:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

1761:

1664:

721:

Most likely all the videos were requested to be removed by Linkin Park's label (Warner Bros. Records) because they didn't want anyone having access to the music of one of their best-selling artists without paying for it. YouTube takes copyright seriously, even if they never notice the vast majority

642:

Hi JoeLoeb! :) Thanks for asking. Actually, it's my opinion that it would be best not to include categories which apply only to the film version of the character (or alternate reality versions of the character, or TV versions, or anything outside the mainstream version), and that it's best to stick

9833:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1570:

Rather like a cute blonde that just saw part of a documentary and then, full of confidence, assumes a matter-of-fact, educated voice and attempts to hold sway on the freshly gleaned topic with other life-long scholars at a dinner party. Like the "cute blonde", Wikipedians and Wikipedestrians alike

1534:

JoeLoeb, I would ask that you take a moment to consider your entries in this project. Knowledge is not a toy, nor a joke. Creating false/useless articles would be like taking the Encyclopedia Britannica, writing an article in crayon on every blank page, then trying to sell it as new and useful.

7914:

If you have a problem with this basic rule, confine your arguments to the Arrow article, where it appears you have yet to contribute any discussion. I am not trying to 'run you over,' Joe; I know you want to improve the article, which is why I am not escalating the matter, but you need to talk to

6131:

animated series, as it runs into two distinct problems. First of all, you need a citable reference that takes note of Jason Todd being mentioned in the episode - your personal observation of a fleeting glance isn't suitable enough for inclusion. Secondly, the fact that the mention was oblique and

3416:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

697:

Hey Joe, what happened to bringing up on the WikiProject talk page, the idea of including categories based only on the movie versions of characters? Did that sound like a bad idea? That would introduce a third (or fourth, or fifth, or however many) opinion into the mix, and I might even be wrong.

7887:

And I will continue to tell you, that they are versions of the characters in the DCU, Jack. Anyone who knows comics knows that Malcolm and/or Tommy = Merlyn, Roy Harper IS Roy Harper, Quentin Lance IS Kurt or Lawrence Lance, Laurel Lance IS Black Canary, and Dinah Drake-Lance is Golden Age Black

1097:

started calling him McG to distinguish him from his elders. He explains that he doesn't go by any other name because it would basically be an insult to his family by selling out on his own name. Plus, you cannot compare him to Pitof...that man hasn't done anything hardly in Hollywood, except for

964:

claims that it's "Approved", yet they won't list who released it or approved it and it doesn't appear in that video with McG. That, or it's probably just some preliminary stuff that was never really intended to be in the film. She only worked on the movie for 10 days, and it takes awhile to do a

2078:

Ok, number one, it's ThuranX, not ThuRex. And I get the personal attack there, don't worry. Number two, a tantrum's not going to help you out. Using the talk page will. Start with why you're so insistent we use a character history which is in universe writing with lots of plot instead of out of

1566:

Bad use of euphemism, User:Bwilkins. Knowledge should never pretend to be, even in the minds of its most fervent editors/administrators, a publication comparable to the Encyclopedia Britannica or the like. Knowledge is a hybrid, a veritable "Marcus Burger", half fact, half fancy, that has never

2562:, previously named another actress in the role, and your change to the article was reverted. This leaves the two articles inconsistent. Could you add a source to the latter article (or preferably to both) to make clear which actress is playing the part, or if both do so, please explain that.- 900:

What promo image are you referring to? I don't recall one being released with her. As far as the movie goes, it's never stated that she became a Terminator, or even insinuated as such. Skynet merely chose her likeness for Marcus's benefit. P.S. The stuff with Arnold's Terminator was awesome.

7871:

article discussion page; I urge you to avail yourself of it. I've reverted the wikilinking you have made to the cast list, as well as removing the redirects from Malcolm Merlyn to the DC character. I am going to reserve judgement as to what is driving your commentless edits, but if they are

1031:

Well, the line was still there. They just decided to focus on a different aspect. You have to remember that trailers and films are not the same, and often the people cutting the trailer will use footage that was never intended for the big screen. As for McG, I think this was far better than

353:

Also, please note that wikilinks should not be Easter Eggs. that is you should generally not need to mouse over to see where the link goes. In the cases where the link and the text are justifiable different, the link should be a reasonable alternate name for the text. (Example: ])

880:

I went to the bathroom to call my girlfriend, and when I came back, Wright was in a surgery room, and "Dr. Serena Korgen"/Skynet was explaining to Marcus about his infiltration. I was wondering about if Helena Carter's "Two Face" cyborg promo picture was in the film. I guess not.

4045:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use

2423:

Please do not create talk pages whose contents are the words "talk (article name)". These are worse than useless, and have to be either replaced with genuine talkpages, or simply deleted. There are generic talkpage templates that can be used, but you have not been using them.

533:

They mentioned that those evil Fox bastards changed Nord / North's ethnicity from German-American to North Korean. I thought that FAA would be appropriate since someone like you erased various categories. Also maybe Stryker found North/ Agent Zero/ Maverick/ Nord in 'Nam.

3427:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines.

787:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 10161:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

10003:

9947:

9891:

7933:

I don't understand what you mean, Joe. Btw, I've yet again removed your wikilinking Merlyn and Laurel Lance. Please stop doing that. Until you have reliable citation connecting them, we cannot include it. Every time they are added, they will be removed. -

999:

Yeah, maybe....maybe you're right, but like I said in my Director's Cut section in T4, there was alot of missing footage like Connor talking to Darkseid about the T-800's, the "My name is Marcus Wright" closeup, etc. Maybe it was deleted, trimmed or cut

9475: 9407: 8527: 6881:

Thought I will just let you know. No matter what universe the version of the character he is in. Navboxes should be used only for articles, not for sections. Welcome to Knowledge though. It's good to have more comic book fans. If you haven't joined

4035:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit 965:

plaster cast of a head, and then apply all that make-up for scenes later...then, if you don't use that it's all a waste of money. This was probably, at the most, just some concept work down by the storyboard artist that was leaked to the press.

5396:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

596:

Okay, that's all I wanted to hear. Sorry, J Greb. Oh, you're right about the film versions being contradictory to the New Earth/ 616 versions of comics characters. See you around, dude. The Agent Zero stuff was just some speculation I saw on

3370:

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of

1092:

Fox didn't pull strings at RT; they cannot rewrite what critics say about the film and neither can RT. As for his name, he didn't choose to be called McG. He's explained that there were 2 or 3 other Josephs in his immediate family, so

5683:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

2151:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

2647: 7952:

as "Some clean up, involving Moira involved with Merlyn Sr., and plan for Glades" is going to be clearly seen as less than honest. Use the talk page and stop working your way into a corner you are not going to want to be in. -

2371:

I have no idea about Snake Eyes. He speaks as a child, and since they've never said he lost the ability to speak, it's assumed that he's selectively mute. The same with Jason. He speaks as a child too, but not as an adult.

1134:, which I heard was very good. So maybe T4 is not his worst flick, but fans of Terminator won't ever give him the time of day again. The name isn't even an issue to me, but we need either some Sci-Fi veteran director or 2079:

universe publication history with more real world content and minimal plot, that which is needed to explain the article. Number three, cool off for the night before replying, so that we can work together. Thanks, Joe.

5400:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

10165:

10007:

9951:

9895:

9591:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 9536:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2659: 280:

Categories that you add to article on fictional characters must be appropriate to and supported by the article. Looking over your category adds for the past couple of days you may not be reviewing the articles.

128: 7977:

Fine, do whatever you want Jack, this is nuts. And I will point out that I don't need reliable sources that ROY HARPER IS ROY HARPER, the links to the articles are clearing the mystery that he is Roy Harper.

2917: 2890: 2866: 9780: 5689: 5570:

that you yourself have made. We cannot use them at all. If you have specific, explicit sources connecting the Black Spider to Spider-Man, please feel free to provide them at the time of article editing. -

1844: 1763: 1666: 4993:. What you did was add uncited information and tried to hide it with a ref to an image file. At best that's "See here, doesn't it look like Starro." It's OR. "It dose not belong in a Knowledge article. 2961:

saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge. Happy editing!

783:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

5647: 9830: 9799: 9785: 5086:

and, if you do not self-revert immediately, you could be reported and blocked. Please use the talk page to discuss, as I can assure you that simply reverting isn't going to change anyone's mind. -

8969: 323: 9403: 8965: 4028: 5753:

It's the first apperences of him, so maybe he may be a huge character, but idk that. And adding him to Toyman makes no sense, it's the character's son, and it involves him and his father... (

5679: 5652: 1606: 8523: 1656: 135:

for no reason. Aside from it being a red link, there is apparently no mention of this ability anywhere on the character's page. Seriously, provide a reference for your edits the next time.

643:

with just what the mainstream comics version of the character is about. Otherwise, we could get kind of crazy with the categories, and some character articles have quite a plenty already!

2064:) 16:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC) FInally, if you would use edit summaries, others might be able to figure out why you're doing what you're doing each edit, and see your ieas coming through. 1221:

towards your fellow Wikipedians. It's not cool to go around calling people "Jackass" who were probably not aware of your earlier debates (as seen by my talk page where they said they did

9471: 5161:, used to house exhaustive, up-to-date, all-inclusive, every-character-likely-to-have-been-a-member lists. Just the, more or less, initial line-up. Beyond that we have list articles. 283:

If another editor points out that the category is not for or is not supported by the article, don't just add it back. Try explaining on the talk page why the category should be added.

2859:

a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Knowledge, then you should do one of the following:

4615: 4623: 4532: 1650: 1611: 8875: 2641: 4619: 3656: 1535:

Most editors are here to both improve the project, and prevent damage to it. If you're not for one or both of those reasons, then this might not be a good past-time for you. (

370:

linked immediately following "...Batman: Master of the Future...", there is no need for the double link. And there is no need for the "(1991)" the way that paragraph is set up.

9651: 2331:

is when one chooses not to speak, and we do not have a category for that. We cannot put him in a category of people who do not have the ability to speak when it's his choice.

394:

doing it to be a dick or anything, it's just that a lot of editors are just almost superhumanly devoted to policy. Someone will probably see it and start quoting Knowledge's

9625: 5603:

Because you want to add something of value which will stand the test of time? Or..heck, I've got nothing in the way of motivation for you, bub. Maybe you can find something

1871: 3652: 2352:

I thought everybody put that under his page. Sorry. But I say he's a mute. I won't add it, even though some may disagree. Isn't Snake Eyes capable to speak, but dosen't. (

1784: 8391: 7676: 4671: 4260: 2988:

all about? I see you reverted it two edits later, but that orange banner still stays around. And that just makes me want to find out more. I won't what, exactly? Thanks.

9910: 9057: 1004:

lingo). But maybe Korgen was involved with the same project that Marcus was conned into. A Terminator with her organs, brain,etc. Time will tell in T5, oh and say no to

8326: 1209:

The moniker should be directed to the Smallville page, because it's associated with the show, not the comic book character. Even if Clark one day becomes "Superman" on

10226: 5203:

No, there isn't. At least not in the navbox. There may be a reason to split the roster lists out of the main article and link the 'box to that, But that's about it. -

4088: 8387: 8044: 7672: 6087: 4667: 4256: 4096: 3107:

be included in a navigation box. "Minor characters" tends to include those like: Free Spirit (comics), Jack Flag, Bernie Rosenthal, Bernie Rosenthal, and Flag-Smasher

9004: 6203: 6150: 6069: 1576: 8322: 7557: 429:

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Knowledge's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining

10200: 9944: 9322: 9269: 8951: 7315: 7198: 7109: 6897: 6787: 6628: 6575: 5980: 800: 435:? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Knowledge's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the 10259: 8040: 7765: 6699: 6083: 4092: 3110:

Characters that are not central to the topic covered by the 'box should not be included. This includes those like: Baron Strucker, MODOK, and Viper (Madame Hydra)

2729:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 1893:

But you made I look sloppy and downplayed. Without the other appearances and pictures it looks not right. Can't we compromise? Did you do that to Deadpool, too? (

9216: 9163: 7056: 7003: 6734: 6681: 6486: 6433: 2573: 1687: 1571:

should learn to discern "respectful" applause from "indulgent". And embrace whatever applause it can get to its vast, ample-terabyted (but alas, false) bosoms.

9849: 7553: 6915: 6843: 5705: 3875: 9110: 6950: 6316: 5891: 5838: 5665:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the

3064: 2844:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our 1682: 7761: 7390: 7230: 6695: 4736: 2459:

Joe, I noticed that - a few weeks ago (yes, I know, there's a backlog, gimme a break) - you created some more talkpages that just said "Talk:<pagename: -->

1939:

My god, power has gone to your head, you need to be stopped. Can't we talk. Okay , I keep the old stuff, the pics and summary's, while you edit other ones. (

8898: 8181: 8012: 7644: 7425: 4931: 4878: 4704: 4563: 4295: 2464:. If you want to create a generic talkpage, do {{Talk header}}. Okay? (and the reason I'm not imposing disciplinary measures is because you weren't doing it 8124: 7700: 6911: 6839: 3935: 3916: 3871: 1876:

Do you know how Knowledge works? The article needed a clean up. It had overly detailed plot summaries of comic book issues and cartoon episodes and movies.

1322:

said in an interview that his Superman lives script described Superman flying as a "red and blue blur" if that's what you mean. The redirect still leads to

9966: 8822: 8769: 7733: 7368: 5504: 5415: 4469: 4242: 773: 764: 7386: 7226: 6646: 6168: 5522: 4732: 1866: 8716: 8579: 8359: 7911:'this is Merlyn, or Black Canary or whoever' we cannot say so in the article. Helena is linked to Huntress because a reliable source made the connection. 2906:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org

2836:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from 9668: 8439: 8120: 8076: 7696: 6752: 6372: 4647: 1885: 8270: 2672: 2477: 2452: 8893: 6968: 6642: 6164: 5518: 5106: 1353:. (In brief, Knowledge is not an internet forum for long discussions of the topic as fans, but for discussion to improve the article about the topic. 10000: 3322: 2823: 930: 757: 9075: 9022: 8734: 8463: 8435: 8100: 8072: 7457: 6748: 6368: 6012: 5334:

about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

4643: 4313: 4025:. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 3822: 3393:

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

2088: 2073: 2011: 8881: 5359: 2921: 9620: 9181: 9105: 8916: 8840: 7817: 6964: 6819: 6593: 5856: 4784: 4209: 3747: 1779: 2975: 2303:

I think an apology on his talk would sort this problem out, then we can all meet at the article's talk and fix this problem. See you both there.

9565: 9071: 9052: 9018: 8730: 8459: 8237: 8213: 8096: 7793: 7533: 7509: 7453: 6348: 6311: 6259: 6235: 6198: 6117: 6008: 5947: 5471: 5447: 4949: 4896: 4595: 4487: 4309: 4120: 3818: 9645:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 9370: 9317: 8999: 7363: 7310: 7193: 6945: 6871: 6676: 6623: 6064: 2954: 2401: 9961: 9775: 9264: 9234: 9211: 9177: 8912: 8836: 8302: 7813: 7104: 7074: 7051: 6815: 6782: 6729: 6589: 6570: 6481: 5852: 4780: 4205: 3771: 3743: 3723: 788: 10272: 9854: 9815: 9811: 9158: 6998: 6400: 5975: 5886: 5393: 5238: 3996: 2970: 2602: 961: 804: 9340: 8946: 8787: 8611: 8265: 8233: 8209: 8176: 7789: 7728: 7585: 7529: 7505: 7282: 7258: 7021: 6344: 6255: 6231: 6036: 5943: 5467: 5443: 5410: 5188:

Fair enough, but what about addition members/the 2nd incarnation of the DA? Surely there must be some way to include them, must there...?? (

4979: 4945: 4926: 4892: 4812: 4760: 4699: 4591: 4483: 4343: 4116: 4059: 3089: 10020: 8870: 8817: 7845: 7420: 6451: 5552: 5499: 4517: 4290: 3591: 9230: 8764: 8711: 8683: 8491: 8298: 8148: 7333: 7070: 6518: 3767: 3719: 3603: 3460: 933:) Helena was so evil and beautiful as Bellatrix :) Also, Arnold's cameo had the whole theater clapping. Yelchin and Worthington was gr8. ( 10125: 8354: 5327: 5109:

about whether or not Villains should be included in the 'Marvel Cinematic Universe' template. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated.

3437: 2873:

and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name,

2266:

Knock it off, Joe. He's not being a dick, there's no need for you to be one either. Take it to the article talk, I've started a section.

1802:

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use

1624:

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use

9336: 9128: 8783: 8607: 8415: 7278: 7254: 7165: 7017: 6542: 6032: 4756: 4185: 3513: 10228: 9888: 7881: 6447: 5100: 4153: 4064: 3959: 3857: 3804: 3691: 3638: 3585: 3495: 777: 9287: 8679: 8659: 8635: 8144: 7987: 7962: 7943: 7897: 7635: 7329: 7141: 6514: 6283: 5638: 5616: 5597: 3599: 3456: 10148: 9989: 9933: 9877: 9350: 9297: 9244: 9191: 9138: 9085: 9032: 8979: 8926: 8850: 8797: 8744: 8595: 8375: 8286: 8197: 8028: 7850: 7749: 7660: 7441: 7400: 7343: 7214: 7125: 7084: 7031: 6978: 6925: 6803: 6762: 6709: 6656: 6603: 6502: 6461: 6332: 6219: 6178: 6097: 5996: 5907: 5866: 5532: 5431: 5382: 4959: 4906: 4720: 4579: 4497: 4323: 4270: 4169: 4080: 3885: 3832: 3707: 3666: 3613: 3523: 3470: 3402: 3123:

appropriate to place an article on a real person into section labeled for characters in works of fiction as you did with Adolf Hitler

2880: 1597: 1496: 9124: 8411: 7161: 6538: 5923: 5562:

I've reverted them bck out. Again. As has been pointed out to you before, Knowledge is composed solely of the content referenced to

4181: 3509: 2997: 1443:

Oh, yea I remember you now. I don't know why you like creating utter nonsense talk pages for articles that don't exist, but please,

10158: 9570: 5286: 5124: 5095: 4460: 3985: 3928: 3910: 3442: 3398: 2932: 2248: 2226: 1993: 1971: 1948: 1926: 1902: 1306: 1244: 846: 568: 436: 10181: 9283: 8655: 8631: 7137: 6279: 3053: 3031: 3012: 1516: 1473: 9673: 8957: 8584:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

8364:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

8275:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

8186:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

8017:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

7738:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

7649:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

7617: 7430:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

7203:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

7114:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

6792:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

6491:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

6321:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

6208:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

5985:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

5896:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

5306: 5141: 4835: 4237: 4148: 3905: 3852: 3799: 3686: 3633: 3543: 960:

That's the image I thought you were referring to. Yeah, I have a hard time believing that's an official image. It looks fanmade.

772:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

350:

All of these can be seen as adding false information to the articles. Please, read through the article before adding a category.

10120: 9905: 7608:

series. Until/unless we have solid references connecting any character to a comic book character, we cannot do so, as per OR. -

7485: 5919: 5330:. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out 2687: 1554: 750: 10100: 9781: 9756: 9515: 7927: 5693: 5648: 4817: 4014: 3490: 3323: 3279: 2387: 2361: 2312: 2275: 2207: 2119: 2103: 2045: 2026: 1848: 1785: 1767: 1688: 1670: 1607: 1379: 1335: 1258: 1151: 1121: 1082: 1059: 1017: 984: 942: 916: 890: 9343:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9290:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9237:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9184:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9131:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9078:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9025:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8972:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8919:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8843:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8790:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8737:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7393:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7336:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7077:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7024:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6971:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6918:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6755:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6702:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6649:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6596:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6454:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6171:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6090:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5859:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5825: 5776:

Then it's a one liner - if that in the Toyman FCB - not a full blown plot dump of that "one appearance" in a separate section.

5762: 5525:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5212: 5197: 4952:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4899:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4490:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4412: 4316:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4263:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3878:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3825:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3659:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3606:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3516:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3463:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3203: 831: 629: 610: 560: 543: 524: 505: 10025: 9346: 9293: 9240: 9187: 9134: 9081: 9028: 8975: 8922: 8846: 8793: 8740: 8591: 8588:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8371: 8368:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8282: 8279:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8193: 8190:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8024: 8021:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7745: 7742:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7656: 7653:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7437: 7434:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7396: 7339: 7210: 7207:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7121: 7118:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7080: 7027: 6974: 6921: 6799: 6796:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6758: 6705: 6652: 6599: 6498: 6495:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6457: 6328: 6325:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6215: 6212:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6174: 6093: 5992: 5989:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5903: 5900:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5862: 5809: 5528: 5427: 5424:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5055: 5049: 4955: 4902: 4716: 4713:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4575: 4572:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4493: 4319: 4266: 4165: 4162:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4076: 4073:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3881: 3828: 3703: 3700:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3662: 3609: 3519: 3466: 3189: 3175: 7481: 5580: 3317: 2779:

Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without

837:

Not much of a FF fan. BOZ, Odin's Bead, and J.Greb could help you, but I'll see what I could do. What exactly do you need? (

9616: 9561: 2413: 689: 674: 6145: 5260: 1281:

when I searched more carefully. I doubt that's enough to justify a redirect there, but at least it supports your position.

9819: 9656: 7590: 1572: 809: 792: 6892: 2053: 10250: 10232: 9807: 9603:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

9548:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5722: 5075: 3261:. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for 3258: 3222: 796: 574:

The above was a concern about sources since what you were adding looked like it was coming from the leaked work print.

3136: 1484: 929:

Its a promo picture of Serena/Helena with blond hair and having a quarter of her face exposed with terminator parts. (

5222: 4555: 4547: 4435: 3406: 2947: 2443:

impose disciplinary measures. Seriously, this isn't hard for you to do. Just... don't create blanks like that, okay?

2433: 1298: 1195: 699: 647: 440: 8884:

etc; this will also make it easier to check for articles in 2013/2014 and copy the category forward when required.

5347: 2613: 1203: 4861: 4823: 4037: 3094: 2395: 446: 263: 226: 185: 145: 110: 4869: 2764: 931:

http://terminator.wikia.com/Serena_Kogen/http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/terminator/images/1/15/Serena_Kogen.jpg

731: 10104: 9760: 9612: 9557: 5180: 3579: 1714: 590: 490: 478:

Given the current problems with information about the film, do you have a cite for your changes in this article?

395: 3565: 2439:

Joe, I asked you to not do that again, but you did it again anyway. If I find you doing it a third time, I will

5557: 4022: 2841: 2544: 2157: 2017:

I'm not, he won't respond . So I decided to fix the article, but someone always reverts it. I'll try to talk. (

1548: 242: 2508: 1580: 1278: 268: 231: 212:

to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the

190: 160:

Welcome to Knowledge. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the

150: 9327:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9274:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9221:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9168:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9115:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9062:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9009:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8956:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8903:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8827:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8774:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8721:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7949: 7373:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7320:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7061:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7008:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6955:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6902:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6739:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6686:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6633:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6580:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6438:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6155:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6074:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5454: 5317: 4443: 3644: 3246: 3220: 2568: 2527:, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the 2473: 2448: 2429: 2346: 784: 464: 407: 314: 53: 31: 9474:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

9406:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

8526:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

5793:

Your bold inclusion has been reverted, so it needs discussion and a show of consensus before you put it back

5164:

I'm sorry if you feel this isn't "fan friendly", but the articles and the navigation templates are aimed at

4395: 3274: 2660:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 July 19#Category:Fictional characters who can change their size

10194: 9768: 6883: 6122: 5670: 4374: 4365:

does not seem to qualify as a Thor villain, as he has had no significant interactions with the character.--

3343: 2829: 1807: 1629: 1456: 1431: 1415: 383: 343: 48: 10209:

I saw you on Abominations talk page. (I know it was in 2009), but here!! Have this cool Hulk themed Award

9510: 9443: 8574: 5082:

Additionally, you might want to count the number of reverts you have made in the article; you've violated

2296: 2192: 2036:

It's not just about HIM responding, I am leaving you notes on the article talk, and you refuse to use it.

1362: 665:

Sigh, okay, you win this time. BWAHAHAHA. Kidding. :). See the film and you're probably change your mind.(

296: 10092: 10048: 10026: 9748: 9696: 9674: 9608: 9553: 9395: 6876: 5150: 4010: 3998: 2958: 2926: 2900: 2870: 2745: 2153: 2148: 473: 430: 117: 9649:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

5352: 2818: 2582: 2575: 10096: 9835: 9752: 8383: 7668: 6428: 5685: 4826:

was an online source, right? If so, can you add the url to the cite if you wish to restore it? Thanks.

4663: 4522: 4248: 3548: 3230: 2784: 2714:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

1722: 1403: 1370:

Well, nobody ever answers some of my reports, so i decided to delete them. Why do you care to answer? (

716: 460: 346:

is in no way correct since the character is a cyborg - a human brain in a mechanical body in this case.

250: 2636: 2616: 2493: 10152: 9993: 9937: 9881: 8318: 7872:

reinstated again without discussion, they will be reverted immediately. Use the talk page, please. -

5386: 4055: 4047: 3386: 2943: 2849: 2749: 2715: 2175: 1407: 1158: 711: 659: 412: 170: 58: 5745: 5323: 5005: 2755:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

1717:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

1098:

Catwoman and some no-name films. At least McG has done some real films, and varied his experiences (

10214: 9928: 9912: 9646: 8585: 8365: 8276: 8187: 8036: 8018: 7958: 7939: 7877: 7739: 7650: 7613: 7431: 7204: 7115: 6793: 6492: 6322: 6209: 6141: 6075: 5986: 5897: 5717:

If you really think Dollmaker should be on Knowledge either start a non-plot-only article or tag a

5612: 5576: 5421: 5091: 4840: 4710: 4569: 4370: 4159: 4070: 3697: 3350: 2806: 2780: 2694: 2487: 2469: 2444: 2425: 1859: 9426:, releases Electro and forms an alliance with him. With Electro's help, Harry breaks into Oscorp, 7549: 5231: 2985: 2981: 2848:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be 2798: 2722: 1726: 1323: 1168: 874: 403: 164:

if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered

132: 34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 10218: 3113:

Stand alone characters, like Nick Fury, are rarely proper for a "Supporting characters" section.

8515: 7757: 6687: 5406: 4379: 3226: 2966: 2833: 2802: 2730: 2590: 2549: 2318: 1834: 1828: 1813:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1789: 1753: 1732:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1678: 1635:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1419: 966: 209: 161: 80:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 38: 27: 1713:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 1217:

s version of Clark Kent and no other. That's why it should be redirected there. Also, try and

1138:

back (which I think he'll never do). To be honest, the whole series should have stopped after

10116: 9664: 9420:

Hardy|Felicia]]) that Ravencroft holds people at the orders of OsCorp and experiments on them

6903: 6835: 5331: 5279: 5253: 5117: 4831: 4551: 4439: 3955: 3924: 3863: 2942:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

2540: 2409: 2222: 1967: 1922: 1881: 1775: 1290: 1187: 827: 301: 245:

or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to

65: 9498: 9431: 8553:

Invasion" Pt. 2, the Makluan Overlord sends an upgraded version of Ultimo against Iron Man,

3401:. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see 2615:) unless you have addressed the issue or "other uses" that include reasonable misspellings ( 10268: 9599:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9544:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9506: 9439: 8570: 7864: 7374: 7325: 7222: 4865: 4728: 4051: 3367: 3270: 3027: 2993: 2845: 2760: 2559: 2513: 1718: 1492: 1452: 1427: 259: 222: 181: 141: 122: 104: 85: 69: 5068: 5061: 5017:

Using an image is an appeal to "I'm a fan I know what this is because it looks like that."

8: 10210: 10108: 9764: 9641: 9626: 9604: 9549: 8116: 7954: 7935: 7873: 7692: 7609: 6266: 6137: 5608: 5572: 5087: 4366: 3410: 3262: 2726: 2711: 2161: 2127: 1852: 1344: 205: 165: 81: 73: 3919:. The source cited at the end of that passage does not mention Danny's surname. Thanks. 3152:

Characters that are not central to the topic covered by the 'box should not be included.

1507:

Sorry, just got carried away. :( For God's sake, take a chill pill, brah!-Eric Cartman.(

578:

you don't add that type of stuff. Hence the question to clarify your source. That's it.

10254: 9709: 6887: 6634: 6525: 6156: 5816:

Just discovered that their is a Dollmake section of Knowledge, so i didn't know that. (

5510: 4421: 3433: 3235: 2670: 2418: 2144: 2139: 1536: 859:

positively associate with, you could see a cyborg endoskeleton in between transitions.

769: 727: 637: 399: 310: 43: 7903:

Unfortunately, we cannot utilize your deductions within any article within Knowledge.

3288:

bit, either point to where in the episode the team name is used or find a source that

2980:

Okay, when I got up this morning Knowledge kindly announced (in the form of the usual

2911: 2323:

I keep removing the category "Fictional mute characters" because Michael is not mute.

10175: 10075: 10014: 9984: 9968: 9731: 9580: 9571: 9525: 9516: 9366: 9357: