User talk:Jayjg/Archive 27

158:

unlikely to be a sockpuppet, and John had indeed been working on them for some time. I saw no reason to consider him a sock of anyone, and was not aware that his current account had started off as an alternate account; even if I had been aware, I would have been more inclined to email him and ask quietly what the current situation was. I know there are other admins (and possibly even arbitrators) watching those pages, mainly because other admins have taken action on them from time to time, but I don't recall ever having an off-wiki discussion with anyone specifically about these pages. One or two editors, yes, but not John. Can we maybe let that thread close so that it doesn't continue to hang over his head?

359:

October 2008 were intended to tighten up the rambling, verbose style and to make the discussion more organized and concise. I think I have accomplished that without sacrificing truth or relevant encyclopedic information. I obviously would like the 22 October version to stand. Please take time to compare the two versions (11 October and 22 October) and tell me specifically what items of information should be carried over from 11 October to 22 October. This will enable us to produce a good encyclopedic version for this section. You can write to me here, on

3248:? Third, even if his opinions were worth noting, where does he say that "Israeli policies" caused "poverty... to the Palestinian citizens of Israel"? He just says that the Israeli farms were lush, and Arabs were not - he doesn't talk about "Israeli policies" at all. Finally, where does he discuss "why the Syrian had fought for the Palestinians cause"? He just says he understands why they took shots at Israelis. Shooting at Israeli farmers is not "fighting for the Palestinians cause". Please respond meaningfully to these questions. 3880: 4615:

allowed to upload them (the book is an English translation of a French book, copyrighted 1955. The book itself has been translated into English twice, and one translation was originally published by Atheneum, now by Penguin. The images of course are always the same). Second, if I am allowed to upload them (I want to use them to illustrate a section in the Culture article that discusses the author's theories), I do not know technically how to. If you can tell me what to do or where to look I would appreciate it.

2694:

of the traditions and ways of Rabbi Nachman, and Rabbi Israel Dov Odesser said: I Am Rabbi Nachman (obviously this needs explanation, but also obvious is that it deserves mention), and created a whole group of chasidim loyal to Rabbi Nachman - is that not relevant to Rabbi Nachman - thousands of followers that claim to have a unique understanding of Rabbi Nachman and who almost exclusively publish all Rabbi Nachman's teachings?!!!!!! Please note that today, 20 Kislev, is the birthday of Rabbi Israel Dov Odesser!

31: 5123:, who just surfaced for the first time last Thursday to edit the above article, has been resisting all attempts to conform with Knowledge policy on categorization. Three editors, including myself, have tried to explain to him/her that specific categories are preferred over general ones, but s/he has reverted all efforts to delete categories like "Jews," "Judaism," "Aliyah" and "Religion in Jerusalem" (where Noah Weinberg is the only person listed). Can you help us here? Thanks, 4760: 1416:

indefinitely semi-protected if it is the subject of persistent BLP or NPOV policy violations. A true point, but the POV edits appear to be coming from him as well. The version he reverts appears to be the better version, though it needs a source or a reworking of prose. Either way, at one point you removed these quotes, and another user questioned the source of the last sentence in the criticism section (the information is attributed to the ADL, but cited to another site).

4429: 246:

wikipedia page. Feel free to respond with any questions or comments. I welcome them. You may be interested to view the website, agudathmontgomery.com. This website makes no mention of the several sections you deem important. Finally, for the life of me, I do not understand how you, an administrator no less, can intervene on this page so many times. Please try and communicate to me why you do so and exactly what your credentials are to make such a decision.

4895: 3509: 1893: 3711: 2275:: "The first approach should be direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this guideline. If persuasion fails, consider whether you are involved in a content dispute. If so, an early recourse to dispute resolution may help. Another option is to initiate discussion at WP:COIN, where experienced editors may be able to help you resolve the matter without recourse to publishing assertions and accusations on Knowledge." 4067:"Six months ago Israel asked and received a cease-fire from Hamas. It unilaterally violated it when it blew up a tunnel, while still asking Egypt to get the Islamic group to hold its fire." Also, the way it is currently worded in the wiki article, it claims the ceasefire collapsed when Hamas shot rockets. The truth is the ceasefire already expired by then so how can Hamas cause the ceasefire to collapse? Please remove your undo. — 5074:

was to make the pages I annotated easier to locate by adding them to "American Jews" a - category that many other pages are subsumed into. I still profoundly disagree with the idea of preferring specific categories of generals ones (isn't Alan Dershowitz both an American Jew and a Jewish-American writer? Why can't he found in both categories?) but will respect the wishes of the editors. I thank the both of you for your time.

6241:. I particularly like 'Just because a reliable source makes an argument, it doesn't mean the "door is open" for Knowledge editors to construct counter-arguments (or even supporting arguments) on the same topic'. I thought that this (or something very like it) would make an excellent addition to NOR itself, as this kind of problem seems to come up over and over again, and your summary of policy is so clear and quoteable. 3750: 4954:(a topic on which I've recently been lectured in stern terms by one of the DAB "specialists"). I was considering deleting the POWdis template from this page. Since you have been involved in maintaining this page, and since I have very much appreciated your efforts to develop and maintain good synagogue articles, I wanted to ask your opinion on what you think would be best here. Thanks very much.-- 1165:, may now be used as sources about themselves and their own activities elsewhere too, albeit in a limited way. (This should not be confused with self-published expert sources being used as sources in their area of expertise, which is allowed -- the issue I'm talking about here is self-published and questionable sources with no expertise writing about themselves and their activities.) 4792:(Extra context for the above: The original addition was made under the subterfuge that "telling the story of The Forgotten Rachels" would indeed belong in "Artistic Tributes" in a perverse way, but Gross barely mentions them. Once the actual source was found and this was determined, there was strong consensus for removing it from that section (4-0). IronDuke recently came back and 3792: 3800: 2875: 1722: 4852:. There appears to be no way to communicate with this user whose activities have now become clear harassment and vandalism per Wiki's policies - what's worse he seems proud and gleeful of his display of arrogance and audacity in thumbing his nose at all guidelines. I'm hoping you can review this. This user is wasting a lot of my time and affecting numerous valuable bios. 112: 850:, citing 'undo edit by banned editor' as the reasoning. Could you please explain this? Perhaps I'm being dim, but looking through the contributors to that page since the version edited by RussBot that you reverted to, I don't see any banned editors. I have therefore restored the disambiguation page; if you simply feel it is inappropriate, please feel free to 3060:), unlike the blind reverters, who have basically just deleted, regardless of sourcing. There is no consensus to make this change to the lede, which has used this wording for almost two years. I'm hoping the RFC I started will achieve some sort of consensus around this, but that does not mean these non-consensual changes must stand pending a new consensus. 3906:(disapproving or contemptuous), or insulting manner . . . used to insult on the basis of race, ethnicity, or nationality." the term self-hating jew seems to meet all of these qualifications - the def. implies only one is necessary. thanks so much for your patience, i'm new here and not trying to step on toes, although it seems i have already. 537:

and I'd like to reiterate that request now. My words were, "This edit illustrates more of Jayjg's opinions on that." Apparently you dispute this, and this is the first I hear of it. If your opinion has changed, please direct me to the edit where you stated that your opinion has changed on that, or state now that you no longer agree with

593:, which contains guidance on editing/removal of other editors' comments. For the time being, I will be restoring my comment, along with a note that it is disputed and a link to this discussion. I believe it incivil for Jayjg to delete the comment in this case, as in my view it containing no rudeness, incivility, nor misrepresentation. 2683:

terminal or are they being processed and I will see the required corrections in the near future? If you are not prepared to make the necessary and obvious corrections (to anyone who saw the original hebrew source and was not drawing from some unreliable translation) please remove the original entry - it is disrespectful to Rabbi Nachman!

4873:

detail should be included in the lead section. I felt that the lead had gotten totally out of hand compared to other bios and reverted to the last stable version. I have proposed trying to rewrite the intro to meet in the middle and will work on that. The best place to continue this would be on the Brin talk page. Anyways. Thank you, --

6091:. Huh? Seems to me that the already-existing category, "Jewish Atheists," will take care of the small number of non-believing Jews compared to the large number of believing Jews, and the latter already has many sub-categories under Category:Jews. I'm not sure where to register my complaint, though, so I'm turning again to you. Thanks, 555:, I do not have reason to believe a view (virtually all medical organizations' on one hand, yours on the other) has changed unless a statement to that effect is made. Should you make a statement to that effect, I will strike the comment of mine that you deleted from Talk:Circumcision, and which I restored, and add a clarification. 3710: 2828:

by English- and French-speaking baalei teshuvah, most of whom were well-versed with the then-drug scene and were seeking a guru to teach them Rebbe Nachman. Today they dance on cars and block traffic in downtown Jerusalem, among other places; certainly not what Rebbe Nachman had in mind with his deep and erudite teachings.

5290:. It concerns a table comparing the accounts of Matthew and Luke. There are concerns over the use of primary sources, OR, novel synthesis, lack of explanation/context which would be afforded by prose, and even its necessity, given the section "The nativity as myth". The table can be seen at this version of the page: 1310:) claiming to keep it more streamlined (and before he edited his comment also less problematic), but he removed references Royal added in the process (which to me doesn't seem to be very constructive). Since he reverted to your edit, I figured it would be a good idea to ask you what you thought of Royal's edit. - 2499:

progress as I did. (And actual employment is the main COI I worry about in articles on several topic areas I work on.) But I do remain confused about how much you can question an editor's patterns of editing for POV. Quess I'll have to read that article separately!! Geez, can I get a law degree out of this? :-)

5760:. I have looked there and it seems that there was a long argument, but I could not see any conclusions (but maybe I did not look well enough). Since you were involved in that argument, can you please tell me if there was some policy emerging from that discussion regarding the omission of these names? Thank you. 5094:

Again, my suggestion to both of you: when you are one of the parties involved in a dispute, it's a bad time to act as judge and jury. I'm an admin, too, but when I'm involved in a dispute with anyone who has made substantive contributions - and sometimes when I am not a party to the dispute, but just

3609:

I see you've made some edits on this one in the not too distant past (of the reverting vandalism variety). I'm strongly leaning towards nominating this thing for deletion since I can find no reliable sources for it and it seems to mostly be fly paper for people who love/hate this non-notable, vaguely

3220:

Stop deleting a quote from the book...The book is RS. The quote comes from Yahiam archives...who he is is of no import it is an observation on the poverty caused through Israeli policies...Israel had the policy that the Palestinian citizens of Israel were under martial law and that all produce was to

2741:

Hi Jay. I know that you have some history with a couple of the editors on the I-P pages, and I try to stay out of back and forth discussions, as long as things stay relatively civil and focused more on the article than the other editors. A certain amount of vigorous debate is great. :) However, in

2693:

Please do get back to me, I am waiting to hear from you. Especially you should provide me with sufficient reason to deny the mention of Rabbi Israel Dov Odesser in an article about Rabbi Nachman. Rabbi Israel Dov Odesser OB"M was undisputed as one of the most reliabe, if not the most reliable, bearer

2362:

Hey, I even read and cleaned up a couple things on my user page. And I am realizing it's dumb to publicize things that don't really sell on CarolMoore.net when I could throw in some photos or videos. Hmmm, is it illegal to list wiki articles I've worked on NOT currently subject to debate? Thanks for

2166:

but he also is a wealthy business man with others stories past and future about him. There were at least six stories about him found through NEWS.GOOGLE just today (12/11/08) (and several hundred that may have mentioned him linked below one of them). One is about an ongoing investigation of him which

1101:

True. One of the problems with Knowledge is that political heat makes the encyclopedia look amateurish. Some articles are way out of proportion to their importance, because thery are somebody's hobbyhorse. Some that should be sections are articles. I think it is worth merging. It will keep human

810:

is regarding some actions of yours. Please present your views there if you can. I suspect that the user (or the other users mentioned) is not familiar with our policies. So I thought that if you gave the reasons for these actions yourself rather than someone else trying to explain to him, it would be

536:

My apologies, Jayjg, but I do not remember claiming that this is how you "really" (quotes in your text) feel. I don't know you well enough to say that. I also remember asking in the past to please refrain from using quotes in a context that might imply the words quoted were the actual words I used,

386:

I had a look around to see what on earth you were going on about when I referenced a bit of english translation of the Talmud to the come-and-hear site. I think now it must be because parts of the site were lifted from some anti-semitic writings so I can certainly agree with that. It would save a lot

147:

Jayjg, I read your question in the thread about John, and will respond to it here if you don't mind, because I am hoping someone will archive that thread so it is no longer an albatross for John. I've been keeping an eye on the Mantanmoreland related pages since shortly before the arbcom case closed,

3322:

I think that you are not ready for wiki...I think that the article does need development and I also think most of the development could have been done on Banias until it was ready for a split but the deletionist israelophile propagandists are not able to seek any form of consensus and only want full

3052:

And of course, the latest reverter is Nishidani, who has managed to revert the article today without bothering to comment on Talk: either - an amazing revert really, the first article edit he has made since November 22, when he claimed he was no longer editing Knowledge articles. In contrast, I have

2827:

the leading Breslovers of the previous generation totally rejected the "Na Nach" chant and presentation of Breslov teachings. The Na Nach movement came into being only in the early 1980s, when the “Saba” was in his 90s, speaking Hebrew and Yiddish and was taken out of an old-age home to be cared for

2230:

Carol Moore is a long-time very problematic editor and I think some sort of forum should be initiated regarding her editing habits and interaction with other editors. The problems start with her userpage, whose apparent purpose is to get visitors to her website and maybe buy some of her stuff and to

1796:

Go ahead and revert back if you haven't already. You say he's currently blocked? According to the block log I'm looking at no block ever occurred. Also, why do sockpuppet templates not link the checkuser request page the findings were published on? Quite often a checkuser is requested on the page of

1406:

racist". As someone familiar with the subject, perhaps you could give your opinion on the matter, or clarify what I am maybe misunderstanding. In my view, the two versions convey the same information, so no version is more or less racist than the other. The major difference is that RolandR's version

358:

Hi, you rolled back my version 16:08, 22 October 2008 to my previous version 06:56, 11 October 2008. There is nothing incorrect in the 11 October 2008 version, the only problem is the style: it is written more like a journalistic piece than an encyclopedic entry. My changes between 11 October and 22

157:

because I don't want to mark an editor unnecessarily with the taint of alleged sockpuppetry. Only once have I posted an on-wiki request for CU of an account related to these articles. I operated on the theory that anyone who had been editing the articles before the close of the arbcom case was very

5062:

is adding this to bios. Not sure what the deal is. I edited a few but sort of gave up. I am really tired of dealing with this "stuff" and trying to figure out what is the "right" thing to do so I will probably just defer to you in the future if you don't mind. Anyways, I give you alot of credit for

3993:

That particular sentence has been the subject of edit wars recently, and it's pretty clear that the "biblical" term is well sourced. I have no strong preference on whether or not it stays in the article or not, but if another editor re-adds the term, please do not remove it again unless there is a

2965:

the change, please stop with the reverts on this one thing? You are still welcome to make other changes to the article, and to continue to engage at the talkpage of course. Hopefully with additional opinions from uninvolved editors, we'll be able to find a proper consensus, and ensure long-lasting

2472:

Okay, I wasn't sure specifically what you were talking about since I didn't research who said what above. Obviously, it is against wikipedia policies to say "it would be good" if people revealed their nationalities - not to mention to demand they do - on an article talk page. I won't do that again!

2242:

in which she repeatedly accuses everyone who disagrees with her of working for either Rahm Emanuel, the American government, or the Israeli government. This is an encyclopedia built by the collaborative effort of volunteers. If there's one editor that's antithetical to what we are trying to do here

2010:

Just between you and me, there's a lot of ignorance about architeture in sources on synagogues. I've looked at Beth Israel pretty closely. It's not Mission revival. I saw the source you used. but, not everything covered with stucco is Mission revival. Beth Israel is a very simple Rundbogenstil

1782:

A banned editor involved? I didn't notice that at all. Royal Lineage could edit fine, could you - from the top of your head - remember the name of the banned editor so I can compare their edits? Even if one source is a school essay, it seems a bit overkill to nuke all the sources at once. (The edit

759:

Hi Jayjg! Thanks for the support on RfA, which passed yesterday :) I haven't seen you in a while in articles, glad to see you still take an interest! You might have been the first admin I have encountered on Knowledge (knowing that they were an admin), and will be sure to talk to you if I need help

685:

of you being involved, even if you are not really. It is probably best in situations like that to use ANI or RFPP to let another admin handle the dirty work. It keeps everyone's hands clean, and removes any appearance of impropriety, even if there is no actual problems. Its fine to say "the article

5538:

I took a few pictures of the front of the temple when I was in Scottsdale last month. Unfortunately the sun was behind the building and the front of it faces a very busy street so the pictures didn't come out great. I've got two that went merged together should show most of the front but I need to

5503:

was the thread of the above assertion at ShJ. On a completely separate topic, please note that your recent ShJ response was to a pretty-blatant mischaracterization of my position, as I laid out in the next section. Whether you want to address that topic is entirely up to you; this was just an FYI.

5073:

Hello Jayjg, and thank you for your message. Threeafterthree: This is my first time editing Knowledge; I was completely unaware of any preexisting issues with categorization and only edited in good faith- I had and still have no intention of furthering any of "this never ending nonsense." My goal

3346:

Wow Jayjg you make out as though you have never even heard of the actions of Israel in the DMZs...you almost make out as though you're incredulity is real, but since you are not new to IP conflict your protestations are, to put it in the least inoffensive manner, bizarre...and in 60 days I will be

2682:

Dear Yoninah: You have categorically deleted and removed all my input from the page Nachman of Breslov, the reason you gave does not pertain to all the damage you did. It is true that I am new to the Knowledge, so please explain to me if your removal of my clear, basic, and critical corrections is

2498:

Fyi I did with edit note: "strike per request since COI questions belong on individual talk pages or WP:COIN" And re-reading COI again, see you have to be careful when doing those that it isn't tied to a conflict dispute in a way to gain upper hand, i.e. esp. by tying question to a dispute post in

245:

Once again, please stop revising the wikipedia page on the montgomery synagogue. I have kindly asked several times. While you may feel several sections are relevant, others do not. Please try and respect the wishes of the actual members of that synagogue. I will say again, please stop revising our

5649:

You recently banned the above user for vandalism. This has continued (there are warnings with diffs on the talk page) and we now have . Also worth noting this statement "No, I think I'll just break the rules till they ban me forever" on his talk page on the 17th after the ban. Any chance you

2460:

Okay, I just explained to you how what you did -- asking editors to disclose Israeli nationality in order to comment on a talk page -- was wrong. Can you agree that that was wrong, and that you won't do it or anything like it again? I'm not looking for "If I did something wrong then I..." kind of

569:

Jayjg, re the quotation marks around "really": I think Blackworm is making a good point. I think it would make sense for you to provide a diff where Blackworm uses that word in a sense that you're quoting; or for you to explain that the quotation marks don't mean a quote of Blackworm and explain

466:

Thank you for the explanation. Now I understand why you consider it misleading. I agree that a comment from so long ago can't necessarily be assumed to represent your current position. I also agree that it's a personal comment not directly related to article content. May I suggest discussing it

152:

for some time before that. They're the only pages on my watchlist where AGF isn't the rule of thumb; given the history, the reason is obvious. During the intervening months, I have occasionally forwarded some usernames to either checkuser-L or directly to one or more checkusers for their review.

4872:

This is a content dispute, not really vandalism or harrassment. I have removed your notices from my talk page after reading them first. I am glad that you have gotten another editor involved and hope others can chime in as well. Basically there is a difference of opinion on how long and how much

2956:

You are not making any other changes to the article, and you do not appear to be making any attempt to find compromise wording, you just keep reverting and reinserting the same thing, over and over. Please, can you stop reverting, and just continue to engage in discussion at the talkpage? I've

2831:

I think someone needs to order this editor to cite references rather than opinions. However, if he chooses to cite his own writings on his website, I assure you that that site carries absolutely no weight with true Breslov scholars. I feel that we're looking at months of arguing and page-ruining

1237:

I'm sure Jayjg knows about the arbitration case. Whilst I think he would agree himself that he's not neutral enough to apply sanctions himself here, he did give his perspective in the AE thread. He really hasn't done anything that would warrent a sanction under discretionary sanctions of the P-I

4614:

Hey Jayjg, I am not sure whether this is a village pump inquiry or what - if you can't answer y questions I am hoping you know where I should go. I have never uploaded any images to Knowledge. I have images made from photocopies of pages from a book. First, I am not sure whether I legally am

3905:

seems like you're everywhere i am! care to join me on the list of ethnic slurs page and we can discuss there? ethnic slurs, according to wiki are "used as insinuations or allegations about members of a given ethnicity or to refer to them in a derogatory (critical or disrespectful), pejorative

1415:

leads to a download for an executable file. As far as the quotes are concerned, from reading the section, my understanding is that these quotes were determined to have been fabricated, thus I don't believe they should even be in the article. RolandR noted to me that because it's a BLP it can be

1168:

Although I do support this change and have argued for it before, I'm wary of it, because it has the potential to open the floodgates to nonsense. It also wasn't clear to me that the change to policy was intentional. I therefore changed it back to the long-standing "in articles about themselves"

680:

Indeed, I was just coming here to notify you that you were being talked about. For the record, its probably bad form to revert an editor repeatedly, and then tell them that you will personally protect the article yourself. I would agree that the article likely needs protecting if the edit wars

225:

I happen to have access to Messianic Judaism: A Rabbi's Journey Through Religious Change in America through a friend. Can you care to cite which exact page the quote you are posting is from since I do not find it on page 1 as is sourced in your cite. In fact, upon review of your "source" for

1513:

Username links in with the behavior of MG, which itself isn't anything special (it includes "guy", so what) but 3 accounts he's created from that account (bearing in mind that account creation is not something a new user would be familiar with) all share the same characteristics as MG;

5262:. He does not seem to read or participate in the discussion on the talk page before reverting anything someone does. Obviously it's ridiculous to take someone to arbitration when he's only been editing for a week, but I think someone needs to have a serious talk with him. Thank you, 3125:, so the best way to proceed at this point, is to put a freeze on further reverts to the lead, and instead try to both continue with discussions at the talkpage, and to also look towards finding compromise wording. To answer your most recent question, the 0RR restriction covers 3078:

I hear what you're saying, and acknowledge that the word "Samaria" was indeed in the lead from January 2007 to November 2008. I also agree that the concerns are not just with your editing, but also with other editors. It takes two to edit-war, and I do indeed see the edits of

2011:

building with the round arch doorway and the telltale inverted crenellation just below the roofline. Stuccoed Rundbogenstil, whit a gabel end to the street. Eclectic if you like, but undeniably more Rundbogenstil than anything else. There are no mission touches. Only stucco.

2823:, as he insists that the Na Nachs are the only true interpreters of Rebbe Nachman's teachings. In fact, "Na Nach" was and still is considered a very fringe element in Breslov circles, and one should be very wary of any of their interpretations of Rebbe Nachman’s teachings. 4290:

Jayjg, also please take a look at this Iranian content. It is located on the same talk page above the link I already provided above. It has been deleted from the article. Obviously, some editors don't like how this edit disturbs the Palestinian narrative orthodoxy.

3273:

I have a better idea. Why don't you a) Make sure the claims you make in articles are actually backed up by the citations you use. b) Make sure that you cite notable individuals, and c) When a couple of sentences in an article are brought to the Talk: page for discussion,

4733:. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. 3307:

Bringing one unsourced sentence, and one sentence that is unsupported by its citation, to a Talk: page is not "disruption of article development". If you think your article is not ready for Knowledge, then develop it in your user space. As for the rest, please review

3221:

be sold at a set price to Israel...previous RS citations within the article have that in...I will be putting a whole string of citations up to back that...If you want to develop the article fine but it is under construction and stop deleting, add by all means ....

2776:

Jay, in the poll you said you preferred option #1 but I believe it was an error since your argument seems opposite your 'vote'. The other "side" is claiming that you are "voting" with them. Would you please check it and see if it was what you intended? Thanks,

510:

I suggest that you try to see the situation from Blackworm's POV: to try to imagine what it was like going through the sequence of events from his perspective, and to see if you can imagine how he might have been feeling to react the way he did. See also

3133:

of the article. You are still free to make Samaria-related changes to the rest of the article, and you are also allowed to try different Samaria-related wording in the lead, that is not a revert, but is instead a bonafide attempt to find a compromise.

2818:

telling his friends how he has infiltrated Knowledge to fight against "biased" editors who keep taking the Na Nach philosophy off the Breslov pages (and — read the comments — to get more publicity for their website). Everything he contributes violates

2445:

I can promise not to break wikipedia policies, to the best of my ability to figure out what they are, including with help of people trying to be helpful. But if policies allow one to deal with issues I will try to figure out how to do them properly.

5361:

Yeah, a user just informed me of that. Didn't know, sorry. Anyways, he IS Jewish. It's a known fact. Anyways, since sourcing is such a huge issue I cleaned the article of all the non-sourced and relatively unimportant info like personal crap.

1643:

All these demands for blocks and the same appeals.....makes me wonder if a checkuser is worth it? IT is pretty blatantly two editors faking a fuss (I figure after all thevandalism and censorship bullshit, I don't have to bother with AGF with them)

4844:, who I noticed you worked with on a similar matter recently, has repeatedly ignored and deleted vandalism warning tags posted to his talk page without responding. On the contrary, he continues to repeat prior activities. He recently violated a 3714:

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. Mizu onna

1074:

each has a section on the application of the term apartheid to Saudi Arabia. It is also the case that attempts ot start pages on Saudi Arabia and Apartheid have been dealt with by reducing the sections on these two pages. It occurs to me that

456:

Blackworm claims that a comment I made a year and a half ago is how I "really" feel about a current issue. That's an abusive misuse of my statements, and in any event is a personal comment having nothing whatsoever to do with article content.

627:." If you wish to discuss this matter further, feel free to do so on your own Talk: page, or on the article Talk: page. Do not comment about this on my Talk: page again, do not presume to misrepresent me again, and do not re-add the comment. 121:, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. 3951:. Could I ask you to intervene with even a few words? In my limited experience, you're the only one I've seen him listen to. My thanks in advance for your time, even if you look and decide I'm being uncivil and have to rebuke me instead. 4816: 3925:

Thank you for alerting me to the vote on this important and valuable topic. I am glad that the truth and neutrality has prevailed. Majority has agreed in consensus, that Syria's illegal "presence" of Lebanon was indeed, an occupation.

3171:

No problem, you have enough to do without de-vandalizing your talk page as well. As for the big yellow box, it provides such an easy way to remove trolling without getting dragged into justifications that I couldn't pass it up. ;)

5550: 4672:

If I don't hear from you within the next 24 hours I will revert back to my introduction. I have no objection if you wat to correct my introduction but I object to it being summarily replaced with the inadequate earlier version.

781: 2377:

I won't actually have to forgive them. Being upset by JIDF doesn't give you leave to make what could easily be construed as bigoted remarks. There's no excuse for what you did; can you promise to never do any such thing again?

5316: 4787:

belongs in "Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie." (disagree) My understanding was that you only meant that PR was wrong in wanting to completely exclude Gross from the article. If I'm wrong, please say so and I'll retract my

1616:

If it wasn't for their editing times being so vastly different, I would say it looks suspicious when Single Purpose Accounts are joined by fresh Single Purpose Accounts with not dissimilar editing strategies and interests.

1184:

I think I support this wording, but my concern is whether the safeguards are strong enough to stop absurd sources (e.g. a self-published astrologer) from being used in articles where it would clearly be inappropriate (e.g.

4216:

Hi Jayjg, this article links to the Main Page so I would have thought that at least one admin would have shown up by now to address the problem. Could you take a look and try to fix it or suggest how to proceed? Thanks.

5321:

So you are can just delete infobox people for no reason and it is not vandalism. This is good to know for future reference. If anyone has a problem with deleting infobox's for no reason I will refer them to you. Thanks,

5953: 3633:

A concern was raised that the clause, "a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge" conflicts with

226:"Christian funded and organized movement," the source you cited does not state such at all - anywhere - at all. Please review your source, and post proof verifying the quote, or remove your unsourced edit. Thank you. 4062:

How is the edit for recent developments not justifiable? The article at guardian.co.uk article is a legit source. CNN has also reported this. Here is an Israeli news source confirming Israel breaking the ceasefire:

589:. I would appreciate it if Jayjg specifically addressed how this difflink to a comment of his, with the introduction, "This edit illustrates more of Jayjg's opinions on that," is a misrepresentation. Also, I note 1575:

Knowledge is not a place for you to state your own opinions. When dealing with questionable matters, like this one, I believe that Wiki should always rely on reputable sources (in this case, the United Nations).

1047:. It appears I inadvertently restored a previous edit by someone else, when I had only intended to correct a grammatical mistake. I think I must have been editing a page in the page history without realizing it. 3690:

Anyways, I have requested the redirect page speedy deleted as an attack, because that is the only thing it is under the circumstances, even after all this years. That's what happens when there is no deadline ;)

411:

edit: I don't understand how you think that's misleading. I don't think there's a consensus that it's a personal attack; and I don't think consensus supports deleting mild personal attacks against oneself. See

4380:

page , considering you are an administor and in doing so removing three facts with sources and only stateing `as per talk`. The comments which were only talked about on the ``talk page`` were this edit here

2605:

Thanks for alerting me to this. I think rather than inflame this editor, it may be better to see what (if anything) she does, and then go for large if it is out of order..... what do you think? Best regards

4668:

You reverted a lot of work I had done including reference corrections (at the moment this article is poorly referenced). Your comment was addressed to "Moze of Kabul" but its my work you were reverting.

2067:

If I enable my email, how private is it. I ask because I know that administrators can discover a user's IP address. I assume that email adresses are equally non-secret, if an administrator wants one.

6087:, has just created this category and is busy populating it with 106 Jewish personalities to date, saying that the category is needed to distinguish between these and Jews who don't keep Judaism, like 5965:'s Nazi history and swastika flag being systematically deleted/vandalized? This removes an important aspect of neutrality from the article. References from many reliable sources are provided. See its 4833: 3121:), and others. I've been having a word with some of them as well. As for reverting the article to the pre-November version, no, I think discussions on the talkpage have proceeded past that point. 3610:

christianish org in central PA. If you've given this any thought, particularly if you think deletion is a bad idea for some reason that's not apparent to me immediately, let me know. Happy new year.

1673:

And annother SPA, this one with similar arguments and undo style to other chaps on the article. Come on, so many random new SPA? I'm not even sure the Knowledge Review thread can cause this 'bump'.

6003: 5999: 1218:

where you made accusations concerning other editors without providing evidence is poor behavior. I'm not at this stage going to apply a remedy, however you should consider yourself notified of the

2986:'s campaign to remove the word "Samaria" from all Knowledge articles, or, failing that, deprecate its use, against consensus. My restoration of the word was initially in response to MeteorMaker's 5987: 2647:, whose very first edit was to dump all kinds of POV information into the above article. Nothing was written in an encyclopedic style and all of it sounded extremely partial to the camp of Rabbi 3069:

BTW, does this article restriction cover the entire article, or just the lede? Would have any objection to me moving it into the body of the article for now, so that the references aren't lost?

1158:

The section has been getting changed slightly over several months, I think mostly with a view to tweaking the writing, but the result (perhaps inadvertent) has been a significant policy change.

5893:, there is no consensus to remove either term from any article. MeteorMaker was, in fact, put on restrictions against doing exactly that, and I suspect Pedrito will be as well if he continues. 5568: 5519:

Jayjg, I appreciate your input and analysis of the problems at the Self-hating Jew article. When you look at the talk page next, you will see that Arimareiji has just kicked up a lot of dust.

493:

Having just offered to act in a mediator-like role I'm not sure if I should answer that. I'm not claiming to be in a state of total neutrality but may be able to exhibit a facsimile thereof.

5982: 5551: 4571:

contributions as far as adding categories to bios. If the bio does not mention ethnicity or religion, it seems the category should not be added. I will defer to your judgement. Thank you, --

2742:

my opinion, some of your comments are starting to get a bit too personally focused, and you also seem to be to the point of just copy/pasting more or less the same comment on multiple pages.

1605: 1594: 2196:

Uh, Carol? This is such an assumption of bad faith that it violates user behavior policy. Please refactor your complaint/concern in a manner that does not constitute a personal attack.

977:

left on his page. It was intended up as a follow up to your comment to him for you both to see. You're probably aware of the first half of what I said but may not be aware of the second.--

2130: 5720: 5331: 6120: 5920:

notice that this particular wording was that of a quoted source, how to indicate that this is the reason for the phrasing of the page text (and lede at that)? I'll put a note on the

4359:

Could you please have a look at these articles because what happens there seems to me not very wise and a little bit not in compliance with wp:npov but rather more with wp:soap. Thx.

2461:

statements. That's generic and meaningless. I'm looking for you to acknowledge what you did, admit it was wrong, and promise not to do it again. Can you do that? I won't ask again.

5995: 5988: 3031:, who reverted for almost two weeks before even deigning to comment on the Talk: page at all, and has since continued to revert while rarely commenting further - 10 times in all. 1396: 1392: 3201:

specified that I was wrong in indenting his response, because as you said it made it look like he was responding to me. Thank you for helping me learn more about Wikiquette. ^_^

2353:

having a page to attack wiki editors and the whole well known history of outside influence here. You'll have to forgive the dozens of editors who sometimes lose it on this issue.

2238:

But userpage violations and a general interest in propagating extremist POV's would not be that problematic if not for her way of interacting with other editors. See for example

4885: 4260:, as claimed here and on the article's talk page. They were merely engaging in good faith attempts to keep the talk page down to a reasonable size under difficult circumstances. 2582:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- 5966: 272:

the article on the synagogue, that the standards for the synagogue's website are not those of Knowledge, and that removing properly sourced, relevant information is considered

5585:

describe as "false flag" operations. You shouldn't be trying to find examples based on your own definition of the term, and how well you think various actions fit it - that's

5484:. Since all of this user's Third Opinion activity seems to have come after my Third Opinion request, you will understand if I view this as less than kosher. Any suggestions? 4864: 1883: 5916:

Thanks for the quick pickup! but now I have a question: since I -- a fairly well-informed and usually careful yet hasty reader as well as being an editor by vocation -- did

3323:

compliance in reproducing of the minority global POV and an wiki as an Israeli mouth-piece...I think that fair words are not a substitute for obscene actions...please review

1608:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 4968: 2797: 2749:

There's really no need to reply to everything that others say, is there? Also, telling someone that their opinion is "irrelevant", is not a good way to de-escalate disputes.

2702: 2644: 5813:

It's difficult to comment on that without commenting on individual editors, but FWIW, there are tons of reliable sources for the position that "J+S" are non-compliant with

5412:

Jay, a fellow editor who wishes to be anonymous at wiki has asked me if he activates his email can administrators or "elites" see it? I wasn't 100% sure so I was asking...

4200:-Vandalism to Talk Page- Unfortunately, the below links may not work as the Talk Page has been vandalized and evidence of a dispute removed from the article and Talk Page 1526:. I think the chances of 4 linked accounts who's names follow the conventions of a known LTA and sockpuppeteer being created as a coincidence are highly unlikely at best. 1219: 5524: 5489: 5456: 3499: 3434: 3419: 2688:

Please reinstate the reference I supplied to Na Nach Nachma Nachman Meuman - which is a page in the wikipedia itself pertaining to how Rabbi Nachman is understood today!

2561: 2552:

doesn't make it clear where to link ticket numbers and volunteers, so I'm going to ask the Volunteer Coordinator a second time. Unless Jayjg wants to tell me who it is.

2185: 1519: 964: 276:. If you continue to delete this information I will be forced to protect the page. If you have issues with article content, please raise them on the article Talk: page. 3683:

I agree with you on there not being any RS. I actually did a very thorough search for sources, because this would have been a keeper if there where sources. Like say, "

6018: 5974: 5366: 3966:

Thank you, very much - I keep getting caught between the two sides, and any reduction in the volume of screaming from one side tends to have a calming effect on both.

2259: 1810: 344: 296: 4247: 4241: 1752: 1391:

I saw your name in the history. The article was semi-protected for a couple of weeks because of sockpuppet vandalism. When the protection lifted, RolandR immediately

1178: 5346:

to verify ethnicity, even though it's painfully obvious. What I don't understand is, half the article is without sourcing, shall we delete those components as well?

2097: 257: 5533: 1061: 893:, which may be more appropriate.) If that edit was indeed made after he was banned, then you were fully justified in undoing it, and I apologise for reverting you. 4438: 4348: 1024:

I was impressed by your revert of your own edit. If there isn't enough turmoil at that page already, we now have editors having edit wars with themselves! :-)--

4935: 1937: 1540:

Excellent, thanks for your help. I'll keep an eye out for anything else along the same lines that turns up, but I'm pretty sure you've shut him down for a bit.

5520: 5485: 5452: 5297:, in the threads "The two narratives compared", "The two narratives compared, part 2", and at "Task List (January 15, 2009)". Your input on the issue would be 3430: 3415: 1972: 1763:, in which I attempted to improve that part and generally make the section clearer and easier to follow. I don't think I really changed the effective meaning. 960: 903: 686:

may be protected", but claiming that you will do it yourself only opens the door for spurious claims of "admin abuse". Anyhoo, cheers and later and stuff... --

4236:

does end up resolving the first of these issues. However, in the event it does not, I believe you should be made aware of another attempt to resolve it with

2957:

looked through the discussions thus far, and though there doesn't appear to be a clear consensus either way, the general feeling seems to be leaning towards

2901:

Jay, hi, it's me again. :) I know I've talked to you about what appears to be some frustration on your part at the Israeli settlement article (and others).

2579: 2568: 1874: 1155:

Jay, if you have time (and there's no rush), would you mind taking a look at the self-published section of WP:V? I've also posted this on Tim Vickers' page.

340: 5402: 5192:

Is in not accurate? Does it cormorm to WP standards? If not, please explain? Is is not vandalism to remove a Rosh yeshiva from the a Rosh yeshiva catagory?

3553: 3197:

Actually, we were both only partly right. The discussion needs to stay sequential, and his response was not timestamped to show that it occurred later. But

2670:, followed by an explanation of why his POV edits were more appropriate for the talk page than the article. I also moved all his edits to the talk pages of 2173:

A quick look at the article's history also shows little editing activity, so I doubt libelous vandalism is a problem and if it was, this is not a solution.

1841: 1092: 4181:

Since you have contributed to this page in the past, I thought you might be interested in the edits now being introduced by somebody or other from Kabul.--

4036: 3729: 1515: 1438: 911: 859: 4414: 2310:

Carol is taking, and her general pattern of editing, and her userpage... she's correct in bringing a problematic editor to light, just not the right one.

2205: 2003: 1988: 6146: 6107: 5693:

Having a disruptive editor follow me around and disagree with me for the sake of disagreeing with me and reverting my edits is not what I signed up for.

5018: 4601: 4364: 4240:. While doing research on the matters raised in that alert I discovered that even with the bot archiving idle time set to the ridiculously low value of 4019: 1495: 5545: 5099:

and, as dispassionately as I can, ask someone neutral to look into the situation in the rule-enforcing capacity instead of being the enforcer myself. -

4585: 3438: 1592: 5374: 5367: 5083: 4368: 4173: 2912:

article, and of your edits since early November, nearly every single one of your changes (18 out of 19) has been to re-insert the same thing, the word

2278:

I'd say that asking Jayjg if he has a conflict of interest would be "direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this guideline." No?

1498:; would you be able to checkuser him, find the underlying IP and block it? He uses a dynamic one, but it should keep him away for at least a few days. 978: 4918:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4233: 3579:

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

3536:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2091: 1920:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1249: 201:(beginning "You have..."): I've been asking Blackworm not to say things about other editors, so I feel that I must (hereby) give you the same message. 6164: 4877: 3331:. May I suggest that you go away and develop your own articles leaving those who do wish write to get on with it instead of practising disruption.... 3241: 3003: 3001: 2999: 2997: 2995: 2993: 2991: 1523: 6145:

I see that you are familiar with issues regarding the Middle East Quarterly. Can you take a look at an argument over a series of tags on the page

4190: 3945:

Congratulations, you're nominated to be the official I-P diplomat! I know you're thrilled, but you don't have to thank me quite so effusively... ;-)

1804: 986: 797: 5513: 4088: 4068: 2359:

Jayjg and I do have a long history, including times I asked him to delete WP:attack and he didn't. The important thing is trying to correct errors.

1870: 5250:), deleting a lot of extra information I've put into the article, just to enforce his idea of categorization. He doesn't understand the rules for 3639: 387:

of time and annoyance though if you could be more specific about an objection rather than just pointing to the Knowledge unreliable sources page.

4913: 2566: 907: 855: 6176: 5436: 2020: 1193: 1111: 6182: 6149:. the dispute revolves around cherrypicked and POV tags put up on the grounds that the article cites an article that appeared in MEQ. Thanks. 5842:

That is your opinion (and I respect that), however my question is was there a bottom line to the discussion? Was a policy decided upon? Thanks

5671:

I see you have edited this page before, and had dealings with the editor who is now launching a mini-edit war. If you have time, take a look.--

5465:

Jayjg, things were still hoplessly stuck yesterday on the question of it "self-hating Jew" is an antisemitic insult, so I took the question to

5014: 4360: 4279: 3767:

all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced.

1973: 1915: 834: 6205: 6023: 5229: 3975: 3374: 3316: 3286: 3252: 2595: 2508: 2493: 2482: 2467: 2384: 2372: 2220: 1790: 1479: 803: 5851: 5837: 5808: 5786: 4828: 3396: 2455: 2389:

Such a promise is the only thing I can foresee that will keep this from heading to ANI - this was slap-your-mama unacceptable and serious. -

1283: 602: 581: 300: 5880: 4305: 3023:. The reference to the four settlements in northern Samaria had existed quite peacefully in the lede since January 12, 2007, when an editor 1979:

If you're editing articles like this on old synagogues and want a little written on the architecture of their old buildings, drop me a note.

1549: 1535: 1327:

Hi! I came across your talk page and noticed that your yellow noticebox at the top of the page overlapped some of the posts. I have added a

1138: 846:

Hi there. You turned this page, which was formerly a disambiguation page listing articles with 'apartheid' in the title, into a redirect to

747: 702: 348: 280: 5271: 5163: 5147: 2710: 2212:"Using COI allegations to harass an editor or to gain the upper hand in a content dispute is prohibited, and can result in a block or ban." 1126: 6100: 5636: 2301: 2056: 1760: 915: 6268: 3651: 3531: 2750: 2714: 2404: 1772: 1601: 1033: 607:

You claimed that a comment I made 1.5 years ago "illustrates more of Jayjg's opinions" regarding a post I made a week ago. This violates

527: 505: 488: 479: 461: 4285: 3403: 2342: 2316: 631: 564: 6078: 5897: 4810: 4805: 4730: 4657: 3493: 3278:, rather than filling the Talk: page with comments which don't answer the questions asked, and which I can't even understand, and then 2487:

That's good, and I take you at your word. It would be also be good if you would strike that through on the Rahm Emmanuel page as well.

1435: 261: 6132: 6114: 5067: 4715: 4700: 4684: 4226: 4211: 2630: 1955: 1693: 1664: 1177:

Since then, there has been fiddling back and forth, with some changes clearly intentional, others clearly not. The current version is

5796: 5753: 3144: 3073: 3064: 1430:

that were all directed at RolandR. He's clearly being stalked, but I don't understand why this obvious sock of another user is being

1016: 118: 4521: 3619: 3279: 2976: 2812:), saying he has "no claim to leadership of Breslov." I believe this editor is running the nanach.net website, as I found his posts 2139: 2032:

Hi Jayjg. Well done on your recent FA's. Your hard work has paid off! Can you remind me how to find a user's email address? Thanks.

1231: 3723: 3363: 2864: 1777: 1746: 863: 4419: 1361: 1317: 792: 177:

I appreciate your support in my RfA. Hope you had a nice High Holiday season, and best of luck with your massive project. Kindly,

6158: 5680: 5601: 1967: 5311: 3935: 1462: 5528: 5493: 5460: 4554: 4195: 3187: 2786: 2544:(per his edit summary) and he was just being coy by not admitting it was him when he mentioned I should contact that person on 807: 3423: 2327:"the state of Israel, Rahm Emanuel, the Obama campaign, transition or administration, or their cohorts, lobbyists, or assigns, 2232: 1402:

In looking at the diffs closely today, I was reminded of RolandR's wording in the first request, which is that the edits are "

450: 6227: 4663: 4319: 4145: 2893: 1565:

I understand that the argument of "whether Taiwan is a country or not" has been going on forever and has never been settled.

902:

should redirect to... it was pointing to this page, which is how I found it in the first place. Your comments are welcome at

425: 334: 167: 5929: 5154:

Also, wholesale deletes of a dozen categories is also vandalism. Trimming a few us one thing, but mass deleting is another.

5022: 4640: 3662: 1710: 5308: 5107: 5075: 4770: 4540: 4393: 4390: 4385: 4382: 4300: 4274: 2887: 1878: 1587: 1507: 968: 930: 292: 6002:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 5716: 5138:

Why should the infbox people be deleted? Moshe Feinstein has one. Many people have them. I view the deletes as vandalism.

4575: 4343: 3385:

Hi Dispenser. Is PDFbot still active? I've always found it very useful, and was hoping it would go through some articles.

2731: 1170: 1044: 1011: 376: 5947: 5690: 5624: 5373:

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. In the case of a category like

5355: 4137: 4046: 3665: 3210: 2575: 2545: 2143: 2093: 1951: 1822: 1379: 1307: 1161:

The change is that self-published and questionable sources, previously only allowed to be used as a source on themselves

944: 782:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration#Category:Palestinian terrorists and Category:Israeli terrorists

253: 5659: 5201: 5182: 3915: 2101: 1441:. Perhaps it is all really obvious and I'm just having a blonde moment, so please let me know if I'm missing something. 235: 5500: 5472: 4963: 4901: 3597: 3414:

As far as I was aware, I reverted four words in a problematic statement added by an IP user. Was there something else?

3161: 2163: 2147: 839: 674: 545:, but which you admittedly made a long time ago and before your wiki-break. Similar to our differing opinions (mine: 512: 396: 215: 4237: 3673: 3356: 3340: 3301: 3267: 3230: 2041: 1455: 186: 5132: 4780: 4752: 4395:(which for the later the source is still there and not the comments about the execution of the soldiers in the Intro. 3473: 3090: 2841: 1273: 1209: 975: 769: 329: 240: 5421: 4815:

An article who voted on in the past concerning to delete it or not, has been recreated and nommed for deletion see

4623: 4168: 3700: 3566: 3021: 3007: 2615: 2077: 549: 546: 5871: 5769: 5482: 5480: 5478: 5476: 5474: 5470: 5220: 3960: 3058: 3056: 3054: 2987: 2954: 2951: 2949: 2947: 2945: 2943: 2941: 2939: 2937: 2935: 2933: 2931: 2929: 2927: 2925: 2923: 2921: 2919: 2917: 2752:

Please, if you disagree with something, and it's not related to the article, just let it go, or go through another

2745: 2706: 2667: 2250: 1729: 1322: 1056: 433: 5732: 3024: 2902: 2330: 1866: 1637: 1568:

However, please note that the UN, together with most of the governments in the world, have claimed that Taiwan is

1419:

Basically, I just seek your help. I'm further confused by the fact that he's tagged these users as sockpuppets of

408: 198: 5962: 5955: 5791:

Thanks for the info, however I still cannot see the bottom line. Was there any decision to remove all mention of

5664: 5612: 5597: 4740: 4499: 4401:

Further more Ceedjee it is against wikipedia policy to rally people to your ideas/cause on wikipedia, please see

4098: 4078: 4050: 3104: 2540:

backdent<----:::::By the way, I posted this whole thing because I thought Jayjg was the editor who originated

2356:

On that talk page I did strike other comments that others didn't like. Or maybe it was those. Will have to check.

2170:

What could the OTRS be? He's threatening to sue wikipedia because that's the "only" notable incident in his life?

1355: 131: 6250: 6238: 5390: 4102: 4082: 3863: 1994:

Added a little info to an old synagogue stub today, your name was there, as usual. I do admire the work you do.

726: 5469:. First Arimareiji refactored my request, them started to participated in responding to Third Opinion requests 5053: 5048: 4784: 4628: 4526: 3647: 3602: 3166: 2201: 1862: 1204: 697: 654: 139: 4793: 4004: 3991: 3050: 3048: 3046: 3044: 3042: 3040: 3038: 3036: 3034: 3032: 3015: 2766: 1431: 6140: 5978: 4175: 3118: 3019: 3017: 3013: 608: 587: 538: 5970: 4023: 3638:

by placing a higher duty of care with primary sourced claims than secondary or tertiary sourced claims. An

3389: 3182: 2124: 1741: 764: 6223: 6188: 5381: 5089: 4122: 4001: 3624: 3469: 3141: 2973: 2846: 2816: 2763: 1557: 1293: 1278: 1173: 847: 129: 2747: 2743: 5702: 4541:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Vandal.2Factivist.2Fanti-Semite

2908:

now, but there's one other thing I wanted to make you aware of. I was looking through your edits on the

2771: 1941: 401: 6216: 3011: 3009: 1572:

an independent country. How can Knowledge, or you, ignore the claim and state that Taiwan is a country?

780:

regarding this category? There is also an active discussion about its suitability for other articles at

5593: 5095:

find that one side really rubs me the wrong way - I avoid being the one to take action and bring it to

4919: 4597: 4377: 4353: 3537: 2636: 2231:

propagate her anti-Israel views and conspiracy theories. Indeed, her userpage violates numbers 1-10 of

1921: 1706: 992: 840: 381: 353: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 38: 3947:

Seriously, PalestineRemembered is building up a head of steam at the Rachel Corrie page; specifically

2214:

There can be no doubt that this is what you are doing. Would it take a block or ban to make you stop?

658: 6084: 5728: 5281: 4487: 3920: 3643: 3352: 3336: 3297: 3263: 3226: 3005: 2869: 2805: 2652: 2197: 1846: 1485: 770: 6215:

Just to keep things straight, and despite what the edit summary says, it wasn’t my edit you reverted

2112: 5756:

from the geographical location of this settlement and all others, saying that this is according to

5642: 5606: 5305: 5251: 5079: 4996: 4270: 3931: 3900: 2859: 2678:. Today, however, this user undid all my revisions and sent me the following note on my talk page: 1755:, do you think we should do an RfC regarding whether to change the "established experts" clause in 934: 899: 5539:

find somebody with Photoshop to do it. If you would like to see them I'll email you the pictures.

4980: 6219: 5776: 5757: 5665: 5466: 5442: 4776: 4384:. However the revert also include comments regarding the murder of british soldier which is FACT 4141: 4107: 4040: 3948: 3669: 3615: 3571: 2905: 2809: 1963: 1816: 1802: 1788: 1337:

template, which seems to have fixed it. However, I can revert this change if you'd like. Cheers!

1315: 1301: 1269: 1240: 364: 2813: 2651:(a controversial figure in Breslov) and the "Na Na Nachies" (who are not accepted by mainstream 1854: 413: 5911: 5351: 5294: 5291: 5242:

Jayjg, I have been working on Knowledge for 4 years and have never encountered a new user like

5210: 4860: 4620: 4340: 3770: 3557: 3444: 3409: 3192: 2557: 2504: 2478: 2451: 2368: 2325:). While Carol demands that editors who disgaree with her reveal their secret jobs working for 2181: 2090:

I invite your attention to this guy's article and what the times of India has to say about him.

1376: 475: 220: 182: 5998:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 5170:

He co-founded Ohr Somayach. Why delete that category? Why don't' you warn others of vandalism?

4894: 3508: 2659:, a pro-Odesser website. If you would like to see his edits, please look in the history under 1892: 6172: 6154: 5833: 5782: 5630:

Hope you don't mind me poking my nose in, but no, that's not acceptable. Not by a long shot.

5432: 5417: 5112: 4939: 4906: 4593: 4568: 4324: 3524: 3152: 3084: 2791: 2782: 2600: 2073: 2027: 2016: 1999: 1984: 1908: 1702: 1261: 1107: 1088: 999:

Hi, I just noticed that this entire article was lifted practically verbatim from this webpage

982: 5447:

Jayjg, I would like to get your opinion of the addition of the Antisemitism template to the

4156: 3879: 3764:

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,

6264: 5943: 5876: 5724: 5562: 5509: 5337: 5327: 5225: 5197: 5178: 5159: 5143: 5064: 4874: 4841: 4835: 4824: 4801: 4582: 4572: 4410: 4150: 3971: 3956: 3603: 3457: 3348: 3332: 3293: 3259: 3222: 3206: 2698: 2272: 2255: 1474: 1450: 1366: 1227: 940: 877: 870: 743: 670: 646: 577: 523: 501: 446: 309: 288: 249: 211: 191: 5029: 3395:

Yes, PDFbot is still active. It's just that I haven't finished coding in new features in

2162:

David Abrahams has been the subject of hundreds of articles because of his involvement in

1000: 8: 6210: 5921: 5676: 5573: 5398: 5302: 5255: 4959: 4746: 4720: 4265: 4186: 4092: 4072: 3927: 3678: 3098: 2883: 2853: 2675: 2648: 2243:

it's the one that goes around accusing everyone who disagrees with her of having COI's.--

1933: 1611: 1545: 1531: 1503: 1384: 1347: 1052: 951: 887: 647: 598: 560: 231: 149: 5026: 6232: 5890: 5847: 5804: 5765: 5737: 5620: 5259: 4931: 4711: 4696: 4680: 4654: 4562: 4550: 3987: 3696: 3611: 3592: 3549: 3179: 2909: 2895: 2801: 2671: 2660: 2637: 2271:(edit conflict) To quote the first three sentences of the paragraph IronDuke quoted on 2120: 2083: 2052: 2037: 1959: 1812: 1798: 1784: 1768: 1311: 1297: 1265: 993: 921: 832: 788: 732:

Please don't call it vandalism; it's a content dispute. I suggest discussing it at the

722: 691: 325: 102: 6106:

There doesn't seem to be much consensus for the Category, at least not where he asked:

6198: 6128: 6096: 6068: 6032: 5655: 5347: 5287: 5267: 5128: 5034: 4856: 4616: 4336: 4315: 4296: 4222: 4207: 4164: 4087:

Ok, I see how this conflict can be very tricky. Thank you for your fast response. —

3911: 3735: 3489: 3112: 2837: 2727: 2553: 2500: 2474: 2447: 2397: 2364: 2239: 2177: 1847: 1372: 1134: 1038: 1029: 1018: 1007: 467:

politely with Blackworm on his talk page? I'm willing to act as a sort-of mediator.

372: 360: 178: 172: 6237:

Hi Jayjg. I just wanted to express my appreciation of the clarity of expression in

5826: 4689:

So why not delete what you don't like? I at least know hwat I'm talking about...

2336:

That's extraordinarily offensive... does anyone have thoughts about how to proceed?

6168: 6150: 6054:. Since you have been involved in this debate, I have included you in the request. 6014: 5829: 5778: 5643: 5578:

Jaygh: I wanted to thank you for this sussint comment on the False Flag talk page:

5552:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_February_13#Category:Jewish_Christians

5428: 5413: 5407: 5293:

at section 1.3, "The narratives compared". Discussion on the issue can be found at

5104: 5007: 4951: 4796:, along with several other major reverts, and said that you were his second vote.) 4514: 4402: 4349: 4124:

where he puts in dubious Pakistani government propaganda sources to slander India (

4064: 3998: 3940: 3656: 3465: 3453:

deletes all mentions of any antisemitic activities by Russian historical figures.

3138: 3080: 2983: 2970: 2778: 2760: 2626: 2611: 2586: 2069: 2062: 2012: 1995: 1980: 1737: 1684: 1655: 1628: 1583: 1491: 1412: 1287: 1103: 1084: 273: 163: 127: 5860:

consensus it was that editors should not go around switching the terms, something

4950:

isn't really a disambiguation page anymore, at least not within the strictures of

3258:

Write the article yourself. And then I'll delete all that does not directly fit...

3240:. To begin with, the first sentence is entirely unsourced. Next, why do you quote 1371:

should I respond under the RFC lightbulb, or under the section below on "events?"

6260: 6246: 6039: 6024: 5939: 5866: 5822: 5505: 5448: 5323: 5243: 5215: 5193: 5174: 5155: 5139: 5120: 5044: 4820: 4797: 4609: 4406: 4119: 4108: 3981: 3967: 3952: 3481: 3450: 3324: 3309: 3245: 3202: 2736: 2245: 1947: 1466: 1442: 1255: 1223: 1197: 739: 708: 666: 590: 573: 519: 497: 471: 442: 207: 47: 17: 4636:

I've brought the edit in question to the Talk page for further comment. Cheers,

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5925: 5818: 5814: 5672: 5394: 5317:

So you are can just delete infobox people for no reason and it is not vandalism

5096: 4955: 4734: 4182: 4115: 4055: 3635: 3400: 3380: 3328: 3215: 3158: 3130: 3094: 2879: 2820: 2549: 2132: 1929: 1832: 1541: 1527: 1499: 1427: 1339: 1331: 1048: 662: 594: 556: 392: 227: 5059: 3687:". Not that I agree with the sentiments, but gallows humors holds my heart... 3292:

Your disruption of article development is typical of Israelophile stupidity...

3053:

been quite involved in the article Talk: page, have been adding sources (e.g.

2115:

report. The user who filed this report did not see fit to inform you of this.

1865:" and what not. And Infowars? Is that reliable? Could you also take a look at 5933: 5843: 5800: 5761: 5698: 5685: 5631: 5616: 5586: 5247: 5113: 4947: 4940: 4927: 4845: 4707: 4692: 4676: 4647: 4546: 4325: 4133: 3893: 3835: 3692: 3626: 3545: 3367: 3366:, which is the subject of the article. Otherwise I'll have to remove them as 3173: 3122: 2488: 2462: 2379: 2337: 2322: 2311: 2215: 2116: 2048: 2033: 1764: 1756: 1715: 1420: 1408: 851: 812: 784: 761: 718: 687: 616: 542: 321: 317: 269: 5886: 1829:

Hello. Could you comment on this request? What block is he evading? Thanks,

6194: 6124: 6092: 6088: 6060: 5861: 5745: 5651: 5540: 5263: 5124: 4992:"Jewish" is not a clear word that can both refer to religion and ethnicity. 4989:

some want to have the zionist dimension of the so-called "Jewish terrorism"

4759: 4311: 4292: 4218: 4203: 4160: 4125: 4015: 4009: 3907: 3586: 3485: 3399:(mostly the common fixes) so it hasn't done a run of the full wiki yet. — 3198: 3108: 3028: 2833: 2753: 2723: 2390: 1215: 1148: 1130: 1025: 1003: 733: 552: 368: 310: 141: 4310:

Also see this NPOV dispute regarding another element in the same article.

4157:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn#Accusations_of_Antisemitism

3874: 927: 430:

It is not normally appropriate to edit or remove another editor's comment.

6010: 6004:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop

6000:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence

5582: 5343: 5100: 5003: 4849: 4505: 4463: 4451: 4028: 3995: 3684: 3515: 3461: 3135: 2967: 2804:

talk page, and who today (22 Dec 2008) made some horrendous edits to the

2796:

Hi again. I am at a loss to figure out what to do about this new editor,

2757: 2622: 2607: 2583: 2279: 2106: 1858: 1733: 1676: 1647: 1620: 1579: 1385: 1149: 754: 159: 122: 5451:

article by Stevertigo. In my view, the antisemitism category is enough.

4781:

rebuking PR for wanting to exclude Tom Gross from the article altogether

4428: 3782: 1424: 1079:

could be treated in a more normal way if it was merged into the page on

6242: 6111: 5924:

and will hail you for further comment there, for the record. Excellent

5894: 5738: 5710: 5581:

This should be fairly straightforward; you should look for things that

5301:

appreciated, as very few persons have commented on it. Thank you, Jay.

5040: 4775:

Sorry to keep asking, but could you briefly weigh in on the subject of

4637: 3563: 3386: 3371: 3313: 3283: 3249: 3070: 3061: 2800:, who is busy putting his two cents into every discussion point on the 2334:"If you are an Israeli citizen it might be good to reveal that too...." 2084: 1899: 777: 628: 485: 458: 277: 4252:. The editors who were setting the time to low values were therefore 4246:

at some times in the past, the page size was still getting as high as

1732:

to pass this on. Now, DRINK! DRINK!!! (On second thought, don't.)--

957: 6043: 6028: 4646:

Ok Jay. I'd join you there later tomorrow as it is too late here. --

2990:

from the article, one of 16 such edits he made on November 4th alone.

2961:

including the word in the lead. So until there is a clear consensus

2832:

unless we put a stop to it now. Thank you for everything you can do.

1857:

acceptable? The cited source is an op/ed that seems to rant on about

1238:

case. Let's get the content issue sorted - that's the major problem.

1186: 1172:

and left a note on talk asking whether the change had been intended.

388: 6108:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)#Category:Practicing Jews Proposal

5885:

MeteorMaker's theories regarding the use of the term "Samaria" were

2851:

Is this an article that most admins won't touch with a barge pole?

2808:

page, including deleting the picture of a well-known Breslov rabbi (

717:

page. It seems a little strange. I'd be interested in your opinion.

285:

I have now raised such issues and your comments are most welcomed.

5694: 5039:

Did Meteormaker 'win' the argument? I must have missed that RFC. --

3238:

the quote doesn't back up the claims, and the source is non-notable

5994:

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located

5592:

It was so susscint and helpful, it has stuck with me ever since.

5377:, parent categories are provided automatically when you include a 3990:, I see that you reworded a section to remove the term "biblical". 6051: 4969: 2913: 1194:

Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Self-published_sources_on_themselves

714: 713:

Hi Jayjg - people keep putting "Docking" as gay sex slang on the

570:

what they do mean; or for you to strike out the quotation marks.

5989:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria

5775:

It's probably one of the most well-sourced facts in WP history.

4783:(agree), you were really arguing that Gross's Spectator article 3705: 2666:

In response to his edits, I posted a courteous "welcome" on his

869:

Thanks for the explanation. You're right, I hadn't noticed that

5719:, you may wish to comment at the related complaint I have made 4387:, unlike the original POV slant. BUT i further changed this to 4129: 4056: 3661:

I would like to get your opinion on this, if posible. THanks!

1797:

another username making such things incredibly hard to find. -

5246:. He is reverting all my edits wholesale (see history page of 4975:

_Neo-Zionist_political_violence-2009-02-07T10:41:00.000Z": -->

4970:

_Neo-Zionist_political_violence-2009-02-07T10:41:00.000Z": -->

4532: 3749: 1102:

rightw with human rights. If you know how to do it properly.

6047: 5792: 5749: 1411:, "alleged", and are referenced to a dead link which through 541:, which I claimed then and still claim now is a violation of 2621:

see also her comment on your comment on my talk-page .....--

1002:. I'm not sure what to do about it; could you help? Thanks, 661:. Since the poster already knows about administrator abuse, 4817:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ignatz Lichtenstein 3rd nom

3799: 3791: 3519: 2350: 2210:

I would echo GWH, and also quote from the page you link to

1903: 339:

Is a link to an author's column not an adequate reference?

5563: 4995:

terrorism is not neutral while political violence is (per

3642:

has been initiated to stimulate wider input on the issue.

3429:

Thanks for the explanation. I had missed that completely.

3236:

The quote may indeed be from the book, but, as explained,

2874: 2643:

Dear Jayjg, I am having an edit war with a new user named

760:

with admin-related work :) (hope you don't mind). Cheers,

6119:

Thanks for responding. In the meantime, someone opened a

4974: 4029: 1721: 1395:, after one edit. I declined the request and then it was 111: 4458:

enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Jayjg/Archive 27!

2656: 2233:

Knowledge:User page#What may I not have on my user page?

2158:

I have a big problem with this for a number of reasons:

5286:

Jay, would you mind commenting on a content dispute at

4886:

DYK for Congregation Beth Israel (Berkeley, California)

4456:

For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,

4332: 3663:

Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Precedent_for_inclusion_of_nicknames

3027:. Meteormaker has also been assisted in his efforts by 5928:, outstandingly sourced... and it truly came in handy 4848:

warning notice to his page by reverting a 3rd time to

2167:

may result in prosecution. So WP:BLP1E hardly applies.

1946:

Hi, I noticed that you have been involved in previous

1884:

DYK for Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona)

904:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 4

586:

I hadn't realized that Jayjg again removed my comment

4779:

again? IronDuke has come back, and is saying that by

3994:

clear consensus to do so at the talkpage. Thanks, --

3025:

noted that these settlements had been removed as well

2655:). I have the feeling that this user is connected to 2349:

Don't forget about my complaining at that diff about

320:. Please self-revert now, or you will be reported. 117:

Hello Jayjg. Thank you very much for your support in

4590:

I strongly encourage you to read up on this subject

4498:

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see

2321:

Wow... I just now read this (haven't been following

883:

on his userpage - perhaps that should be added? (Or

665:

comes to mind, but I have nothing specific in mind.

6147:

A land without a people for a people without a land

5961:Would you mind having a look at the problem of the 5063:

dealing with this never ending nonsense. Cheers! --

4834:Request for intervention re: apparent vandalism by 4376:Hello, Im very surprised to see the reverts on the 3500:

DYK for Temple House of Israel (Staunton, Virginia)

2982:I note your concern, but the issue has really been 1407:contains some really nasty quotes which follow the 5393:if you have questions about this. Best regards,-- 5368:Category:Knowledge sockpuppets of Henrywinklestein 4502:and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. 3347:placing lots of citations to back up the claims... 4725: 4450:and therefore, I've officially declared today as 4155:Would you lend a hand in settling an edit war in 2722:I greatly appreciate your assistance. Thank you, 2175:(Note: problematic material removed per request.) 418:"On other talk pages, especially where such text 5856:There was no consensus either way. If there was 5557:You might want to weigh in with your opinion. -- 5188:He was a Rosh yeshiva. Why delete that category? 4706:Thanks. I will keep try to keep improving this. 4065:http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1050460.html 1956:Knowledge talk:No original research#Insidious OR 1701:must be the geckos ... or are they dragons ? -- 1562:Concerns about the article "List of countries". 1062:Apartheid and Human Rights, Israel, Saudi Arabia 513:User:Coppertwig/NPOV#Respecting others' opinions 4914:Congregation Beth Israel (Berkeley, California) 4014:It's nice to see you back after your absence.— 2953:And your 19th edit was Samaria-related as well. 1490:I'm posting it here since it is fairly urgent. 776:Could you add your voice to the discussion at 5534:Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona) 4531:Seems you've had contact with this hater too: 4128:) and tendentiously quotes PBS etc to slander 3327:you use disruption to hinder development with 2135:ticket 2008030910010087 extremely questionable 1974:Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona) 1916:Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona) 434:Knowledge:Civility#Removal of uncivil comments 5615:edit summary? Is this acceptable commentary? 3397:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/PDFbot 3 1125:a propos, see my comments on this problem at 426:Knowledge:No personal attacks#Removal of text 5954:Nazi, Swastika References Being Purged from 4592:] before vandalizing my constructive edits. 4533:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Lapsed_Pacifist 2306:Well, following Brew's point above, and the 1127:User:Ravpapa/The_Politicization_of_Wikipedia 609:Knowledge:TALK#Behavior that is unacceptable 5828:and none at all for the opposing position. 3532:Temple House of Israel (Staunton, Virginia) 2878:Wishing you the very best for the season. 1954:. Would you care to comment on the section 4581:This is ramping up as I post. Thoughts? -- 5969:. The edits are being done by users with 4910:was updated with a fact from the article 4486:A record of your Day will always be kept 4389:]. Also you reverted these comments here 3862: 3796: 3747: 3528:was updated with a fact from the article 1912:was updated with a fact from the article 1867:Talk:Deccan_Mujahideen#Anti-Semitism_link 6009:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 5889:, and despite his incessant attempts at 3878: 3364:Water politics in the Jordan River basin 3362:Great. Make sure they all also refer to 2873: 6042:regarding the use of northern/southern 5932:, when I was having my morning dose of 1783:summary didn't mention any banning.) - 422:, removal should typically be limited." 14: 6183:When did the Khmelnytsky Uprising end? 5971:IP addresses from very similar domains 2904:I'm glad that you're trying an RfC at 1264:? about it's restrictions. regards. -- 898:Now I've just got to figure out where 798:Problem at new contributors' help page 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6195:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 5558: 5030:_Neo-Zionist_political_violence": --> 5027:_Neo-Zionist_political_violence": --> 5023:_Neo-Zionist_political_violence": --> 4981:_Neo-Zionist_political_violence": --> 3986:Hiya, regarding your recent edits to 808:Knowledge:New contributors' help page 6187:Comments needed to stop edit war at 5748:has been removing all references to 3562:Hope 2009 is a great year for you!-- 2663:, 16 December, from 14:57 to 17:46. 2111:Your actions are being discussed at 681:continue, but the situation has the 25: 3840: 2546:David Abrahams (Labour party donor) 2273:How to handle conflicts of interest 2144:David Abrahams (Labour party donor) 1952:Knowledge talk:No original research 1606:User:Aaronshavit/Zionism and racism 1595:User:Aaronshavit/Zionism and racism 1072:Freedom of religion in Saudi Arabia 974:Hi there. Malcolm didn't want this 23: 6079:New category: Adherents of Judaism 5799:from settlement locations? Thanks 4811:Messianic Judaism related deletion 4427: 3837: 3771: 3709: 2966:changes to the article. Thanks, -- 2164:2007 Labour party donation scandal 2148:2007 Labour party donation scandal 1720: 1192:Any input would be appreciated at 268:Please understand that you do not 24: 6281: 5013:what would you think of a move ? 4567:Hi Jayjg, Can you please look at 3843: 2142:User:Jayjg created a REDIRECT of 873:was banned, because I didn't see 4893: 4758: 3864: 3798: 3790: 3748: 3507: 1891: 1778:Assemblies of Yahweh (follow-up) 1747:Policy on self-published sources 1077:Israel and the apartheid analogy 659:WP:HD#Report Administrator Abuse 613:Do not misrepresent other people 110: 29: 6189:Talk:Khmelnytsky_Uprising#Dates 5963:Syrian Social Nationalist Party 5956:Syrian Social Nationalist Party 4500:User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! 3736: 3730: 3724: 3722: 3129:Samaria-related reverts to the 2589: 2542:WP:OTRS ticket 2008030910010087 2154:WP:OTRS ticket 2008030910010087 1066:I noticed that the articles on 484:Do you agree with its removal? 119:my recent Request for Adminship 5650:could have a look? Thanks -- 4973:Neo-Zionist political violence 4196:2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict 3858: 3855: 3836: 3758:The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar 3484:is still on the edit-war path. 3246:can you tell me more about him 1068:Women's rights in Saudi Arabia 655:Talk:Agudath Israel Etz Ahayem 13: 1: 6256:I second Jakew's suggestion. 5983:20:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 5948:06:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 5898:01:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 5881:22:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5852:20:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5838:20:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5809:20:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5787:18:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5770:17:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5733:01:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 5703:22:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5681:09:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 5660:07:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 5637:04:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 5625:04:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 5602:20:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 5569:17:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 5546:19:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 5529:15:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 5514:05:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 5494:20:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5461:13:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 5437:06:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 5422:03:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 5403:20:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5356:06:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5332:03:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5312:20:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 5272:09:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5230:03:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5202:03:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5183:03:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5164:03:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5148:02:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5133:16:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 5119:Dear Jayjg, A new user named 5108:20:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 5084:10:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 5068:18:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 4664:Jewish exodus from Arab lands 4420:Happy Jayjg/Archive 27's Day! 4176:Jewish exodus from Arab lands 3554:03:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 3494:14:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 3474:18:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 3439:18:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3424:18:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3404:17:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3390:05:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 3375:17:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3357:12:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3341:10:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3317:10:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3302:10:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3287:10:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3268:10:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3253:10:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3231:10:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3211:21:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 3188:14:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 3162:19:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 3145:21:03, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 3074:20:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 3065:20:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 2977:19:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 2916:into the lead of the article. 2888:07:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 2865:21:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 2842:21:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 2787:20:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 2767:16:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 2732:19:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 2715:15:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 2631:07:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 2616:21:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC) 2596:19:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC) 2562:16:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2509:13:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2494:02:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2483:01:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2468:01:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2456:01:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2405:00:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2385:00:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2373:00:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2343:23:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2317:23:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2302:23:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2260:23:09, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2221:22:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2206:22:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2186:21:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2125:16:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 1989:22:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 1879:19:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 1842:15:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 1805:08:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1791:19:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1773:01:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 1742:02:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1711:04:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1694:20:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1588:08:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1550:03:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1536:03:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1508:03:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1480:03:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1456:17:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1380:14:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1362:18:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1318:18:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1274:13:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1250:23:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1232:19:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1205:22:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1139:11:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1112:03:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1093:03:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1057:03:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 1034:14:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 987:17:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 6110:. You could take it to CfD. 6069: 6061: 5691:I don't need krep like this. 5049:00:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5024:10:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 5002:there are only examples of " 4964:23:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 4946:Greetings, Jayjg. Arguably 4936:15:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 4878:00:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 4865:23:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4829:21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4806:15:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4777:Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Tom_Gross 4771:Again and again and again... 4753:08:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4716:08:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4701:05:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4685:05:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4658:04:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4641:04:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4624:17:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 4602:03:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4586:18:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 4576:15:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 4555:09:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 4522:03:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 4415:09:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 4369:18:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 4344:22:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 4320:09:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 4301:09:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 4280:11:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 4227:08:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 4212:05:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 4191:07:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 4169:19:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 4146:06:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 4103:05:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 4083:05:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 4051:02:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 4024:02:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 4005:21:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 3976:04:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 3961:21:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 3949:Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Tom_Gross 3936:21:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 3849: 3846: 3789: 2102:09:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 2078:23:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2057:23:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2042:23:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 2021:22:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2004:21:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 1968:11:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1938:02:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1855:Deccan Mujahideen#False_flag 1753:this now archived discussion 1665:10:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 1638:07:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 1163:in articles about themselves 1012:21:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 969:17:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 945:07:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 929:thats disgusting. thank you 916:02:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC) 864:02:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC) 848:South Africa under apartheid 835:13:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 793:22:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 765:22:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 748:20:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 727:21:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 703:21:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 675:16:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 632:00:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 603:21:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 582:20:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 565:07:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 528:15:45, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 506:02:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 489:01:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 480:01:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 462:01:24, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 451:01:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 397:10:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 377:03:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 365:Dushanbe synagogue talk page 349:02:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 330:21:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 316:You are in violation of the 301:03:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 281:00:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 262:01:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 236:05:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 216:14:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 187:00:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 168:03:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 132:01:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 7: 4855:Hope you can help. Thanks. 3916:00:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 3861: 3701:15:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 3674:01:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 3652:06:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 3620:22:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 3598:21:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 3567:15:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2308:shouty, aggressive approach 1759:? I made an edit, reverted 811:better. Cheers and thanks. 10: 6286: 6269:21:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 6251:19:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 6228:06:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 6206:01:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 6177:13:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 5744:Hello. I have a question. 4442:has been identified as an 4378:zionist political violence 4354:zionist political violence 2574:An editor has asked for a 1600:An editor has asked for a 841:Apartheid (disambiguation) 6167:has now violated the 3RR. 6159:13:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 6133:18:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6115:01:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6101:08:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 6019:04:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 5864:has decided to ignore. -- 4756: 4728: 4114:Hey Jayjg take a look at 3822: 3816: 3810: 3754: 2806:Breslov (Hasidic dynasty) 1210:Israel-Palestine articles 771:Category:Jewish terrorism 241:Agudath Israel Etz Ahayem 4731:passed today at 150/48/6 1520:User:Timidity's Glowball 1323:Overlap on Your Talkpage 1214:Jayjg, your comments at 900:Allegations of apartheid 852:nominate it for deletion 414:WP:Talk#Others' comments 6040:Request for Arbitration 5758:Talk:Israeli settlement 5666:Park Hotel seder attack 5467:Knowledge:Third opinion 5006:political violence" in 4972:Jewish terrorism -: --> 4920:Did you know? talk page 4785:"Dead Jews Aren't News" 4335:merit its own article? 3538:Did you know? talk page 2906:Talk:Israeli settlement 2810:Elazar Mordechai Koenig 2363:your helpful comments. 1922:Did you know? talk page 1494:has turned up again as 1393:re-requested protection 1296:) reverted the edit by 1260:Hi, can take a look to 1169:version on November 5, 420:is directed against you 5887:conclusively disproven 5295:Talk:Nativity of Jesus 5211:Category:Rosh yeshivas 5209:Look closely, he's in 5054:Category American Jews 4629:Passover Massacre edit 4527:For your consideration 4452:Jayjg/Archive 27's day 4432: 3897: 3716: 3167:Re: Thank you, and wow 2890: 2798:Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun 2703:Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun 2645:Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun 2156:. Take both seriously) 1725: 1081:Human rights in Israel 657:has been mentioned at 6141:Middle East Quarterly 5594:A Quest For Knowledge 4569:User:MichelleSBernard 4439:User:Jayjg/Archive 27 4431: 4306:Gaza Massacre in lead 4238:this Wikiquette alert 3882: 3713: 2877: 1724: 1262:Talk:Arabic Knowledge 943:comment was added at 42:of past discussions. 5611:What do you make of 5342:Added new source to 5090:The Shahak talk page 4842:User:Threeafterthree 4788:mischaracterization. 3887:and Ring in the new. 3865:File:Sufganiyah.jpeg 3644:Professor marginalia 3604:Assemblies of Yahweh 3280:blanking the article 3276:respond meaningfully 3123:Consensus can change 2847:USS Liberty Incident 2567:Deletion review for 2198:Georgewilliamherbert 1593:Deletion review for 1558:Taiwan is a country? 1279:Assemblies of Yahweh 871:User:Reginald Perrin 197:Re the 6th sentence 5975:Histopher Critchens 5427:Thanks very much. 5382:Sockpuppet category 4286:No Iranians Allowed 4118:'s edit-warring on 3157:Vaya pues. Thanks, 2772:Israeli settlements 2676:Yisroel Ber Odesser 2649:Yisroel Ber Odesser 2580:Benjamin M. Emanuel 2569:Benjamin M. Emanuel 1942:Request for comment 1811:Unblock request of 956:Have you seen this 402:Comment on deletion 335:"Poorly referenced" 150:Naked short selling 6074:- 25.02.2009 09:32 5891:proof by assertion 4768: 4763: 4537:Please see below: 4445:Awesome Wikipedian 4433: 4126:unreliable sources 3988:Israeli settlement 3898: 3896: 3742: 3717: 2910:Israeli settlement 2896:Israeli settlement 2891: 2802:Nachman of Breslov 2672:Nachman of Breslov 2661:Nachman of Breslov 2638:Nachman of Breslov 2152:(per WP:BLP1E and 1853:Is this paragraph 1726: 1516:User:All-Star 5000 994:Union Fire Company 926:can we stop this. 653:The discussion at 382:Unreliable sources 354:Dushanbe synagogue 6220:CasualObserver'48 6075: 6038:I have started a 6033:Judea and Samaria 5587:original research 5544: 5288:Nativity of Jesus 5282:Nativity of Jesus 5252:WP:Categorization 4997:wp:words to avoid 4926: 4925: 4767: 4766: 4757: 4724: 4656: 4496: 4495: 4491: 4278: 3921:Syrian occupation 3885:Ring out the old, 3883: 3872: 3871: 3779: 3778: 3772:Mizu onna sango15 3741: 3720: 3719: 3544: 3543: 3477: 3460:comment added by 3186: 2870:Seasons Greetings 2863: 2718: 2701:comment added by 2402: 2240:Talk:Rahm Emanuel 1928: 1927: 1861:conspiracies of " 1848:Deccan Mujahideen 1840: 1496:User:Almighty Guy 1486:Checkuser request 1203: 1019:Passover massacre 734:article talk page 700: 694: 437: 291:comment added by 252:comment added by 202: 140:Your question on 137: 136: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6277: 6259: 6203: 6201: 6083:Hi, A new user, 6071: 6063: 6058: 5874: 5869: 5644:User:Stevewunder 5634: 5607:Personal Attacks 5583:reliable sources 5565: 5560: 5543: 5386: 5380: 5223: 5218: 5031: 5028: 5008:Jewish terrorism 4982: 4976: 4971: 4902:February 4, 2009 4897: 4890: 4889: 4762: 4749: 4743: 4737: 4726: 4653: 4650: 4594:MichelleSBernard 4520: 4517: 4485: 4478: 4476: 4471: 4468: 4424: 4423: 4350:jewish terrorism 4268: 3901:hi from untwirl! 3868: 3866: 3859: 3856: 3852: 3851: 3848: 3845: 3842: 3839: 3826: 3825: 3820: 3819: 3814: 3813: 3802: 3794: 3787: 3786: 3773: 3752: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3738: 3732: 3726: 3721: 3718: 3595: 3589: 3511: 3504: 3503: 3476: 3454: 3176: 2984:User:MeteorMaker 2857: 2717: 2695: 2591: 2491: 2465: 2401: 2398: 2395: 2382: 2340: 2314: 2298: 2295: 2292: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2253: 2248: 2218: 1895: 1888: 1887: 1839: 1837: 1830: 1703:Henrywinklestein 1692: 1689: 1681: 1663: 1660: 1652: 1636: 1633: 1625: 1492:Knowledge:LTA/MG 1477: 1472: 1453: 1448: 1413:Internet Archive 1358: 1350: 1342: 1336: 1330: 1246: 1243: 1220:arbitration case 1202: 1200: 1017:Your reverts of 948: 892: 886: 882: 876: 829: 826: 823: 820: 816: 750: 698: 692: 638: 551:) on an edit to 518: 496: 470: 441: 406: 303: 264: 206: 196: 125: 114: 107: 106: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6285: 6284: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6257: 6235: 6213: 6204: 6199: 6193: 6185: 6165:User:Annonymous 6143: 6085:Parthian Scribe 6081: 6036: 5992: 5959: 5914: 5872: 5867: 5742: 5725:Canadian Monkey 5713: 5688: 5669: 5647: 5632: 5609: 5576: 5555: 5536: 5521:Malcolm Schosha 5486:Malcolm Schosha 5453:Malcolm Schosha 5449:Self-hating Jew 5445: 5443:Self-hating Jew 5410: 5384: 5378: 5371: 5340: 5319: 5309:(contributions) 5284: 5221: 5216: 5117: 5092: 5056: 5037: 4978: 4944: 4888: 4839: 4836:Threeafterthree 4813: 4773: 4747: 4741: 4735: 4723: 4666: 4648: 4631: 4612: 4565: 4529: 4515: 4503: 4474: 4472: 4469: 4466: 4422: 4357: 4329: 4308: 4288: 4198: 4179: 4153: 4120:State terrorism 4112: 4109:State terrorism 4060: 4033: 4012: 3984: 3943: 3923: 3903: 3890: 3889:Happy New Year! 3877: 3854: 3828: 3823: 3817: 3811: 3807: 3785: 3783:Happy Hannukah! 3708: 3681: 3659: 3631: 3607: 3593: 3587: 3574: 3572:Happy New Year! 3560: 3502: 3482:User:DonaldDuck 3455: 3451:User:DonaldDuck 3447: 3431:Malcolm Schosha 3416:Malcolm Schosha 3412: 3383: 3349:Ashley kennedy3 3333:Ashley kennedy3 3294:Ashley kennedy3 3260:Ashley kennedy3 3242:Rafi Rubenstein 3223:Ashley kennedy3 3218: 3195: 3185: 3169: 3155: 2899: 2872: 2849: 2794: 2774: 2739: 2696: 2653:Breslov Hasidut 2641: 2603: 2592: 2576:deletion review 2572: 2489: 2463: 2399: 2391: 2380: 2338: 2312: 2296: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2251: 2246: 2216: 2137: 2109: 2088: 2065: 2030: 1977: 1958:? Thank you. -- 1950:discussions at 1944: 1886: 1851: 1833: 1831: 1827: 1780: 1749: 1718: 1685: 1677: 1674: 1656: 1648: 1645: 1629: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1602:deletion review 1598: 1560: 1524:User:Blurry Guy 1488: 1475: 1467: 1451: 1443: 1389: 1369: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1340: 1334: 1328: 1325: 1281: 1258: 1244: 1241: 1212: 1198: 1153: 1064: 1041: 1022: 997: 961:Malcolm Schosha 954: 938: 924: 890: 884: 880: 874: 844: 827: 824: 821: 818: 814: 804:This discussion 800: 774: 757: 737: 711: 651: 571: 516: 494: 468: 439: 404: 384: 367:. Thank you. -- 356: 337: 314: 286: 247: 243: 223: 204: 194: 175: 153:I've done that 145: 123: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Jayjg 12: 11: 5: 6283: 6272: 6271: 6234: 6231: 6212: 6209: 6192: 6184: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6142: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6136: 6135: 6080: 6077: 6035: 6022: 5991: 5986: 5958: 5952: 5913: 5912:Zionist entity 5910: 5909: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5883: 5741: 5736: 5712: 5709: 5707: 5687: 5684: 5668: 5663: 5646: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5608: 5605: 5575: 5572: 5554: 5549: 5535: 5532: 5517: 5516: 5444: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5409: 5406: 5370: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5339: 5336: 5318: 5315: 5303:carl bunderson 5283: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5190: 5189: 5172: 5171: 5167: 5166: 5151: 5150: 5116: 5111: 5091: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5076:99.175.102.100 5055: 5052: 5036: 5033: 5011: 5010: 5000: 4993: 4990: 4984: 4977: 4967: 4943: 4938: 4924: 4923: 4898: 4887: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4838: 4832: 4812: 4809: 4789: 4772: 4769: 4765: 4764: 4755: 4722: 4719: 4705: 4665: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4630: 4627: 4611: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4564: 4561: 4559: 4528: 4525: 4494: 4493: 4481: 4462: 4457: 4455: 4449: 4434: 4421: 4418: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4356: 4347: 4328: 4323: 4307: 4304: 4287: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4262: 4261: 4197: 4194: 4178: 4172: 4152: 4149: 4116:User:Steve3849 4111: 4106: 4059: 4054: 4032: 4027: 4011: 4008: 3983: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3946: 3942: 3939: 3928:Eternalsleeper 3922: 3919: 3902: 3899: 3891: 3888: 3886: 3884: 3876: 3875:Happy New Year 3873: 3870: 3869: 3860: 3833: 3832: 3829: 3809: 3805: 3803: 3797: 3795: 3784: 3781: 3780: 3777: 3776: 3768: 3765: 3761: 3760: 3755: 3753: 3743: 3707: 3704: 3680: 3677: 3658: 3655: 3630: 3623: 3606: 3601: 3582:Kind regards, 3573: 3570: 3559: 3558:Happy New Year 3556: 3542: 3541: 3512: 3501: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3446: 3445:Help needed... 3443: 3442: 3441: 3411: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3382: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3345: 3320: 3319: 3290: 3289: 3256: 3255: 3217: 3214: 3194: 3193:Talk threading 3191: 3178: 3168: 3165: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3067: 2898: 2892: 2871: 2868: 2848: 2845: 2793: 2790: 2773: 2770: 2738: 2735: 2720: 2719: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2640: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2602: 2599: 2588: 2571: 2565: 2550:Knowledge:OTRS 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2331:goes on to say 2319: 2276: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2208: 2189: 2188: 2171: 2168: 2136: 2129: 2108: 2105: 2087: 2082: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1976: 1971: 1943: 1940: 1926: 1925: 1896: 1885: 1882: 1850: 1845: 1826: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1779: 1776: 1748: 1745: 1719: 1717: 1714: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1668: 1667: 1613: 1610: 1597: 1591: 1559: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1388: 1383: 1368: 1365: 1346: 1345: 1324: 1321: 1280: 1277: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1211: 1208: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1063: 1060: 1040: 1037: 1021: 1015: 996: 991: 990: 989: 953: 950: 931:96.232.251.177 923: 920: 919: 918: 895: 894: 843: 838: 799: 796: 773: 768: 756: 753: 752: 751: 710: 707: 706: 705: 650: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 637: 636: 635: 634: 619:: "Comment on 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 508: 403: 400: 383: 380: 355: 352: 336: 333: 313: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 293:164.111.225.48 242: 239: 222: 221:Shapiro Source 219: 193: 190: 174: 171: 144: 138: 135: 134: 115: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6282: 6270: 6266: 6262: 6255: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6248: 6244: 6240: 6230: 6229: 6225: 6221: 6217: 6208: 6207: 6202: 6196: 6190: 6178: 6174: 6170: 6166: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6156: 6152: 6148: 6134: 6130: 6126: 6122: 6118: 6117: 6116: 6113: 6109: 6105: 6104: 6103: 6102: 6098: 6094: 6090: 6086: 6076: 6073: 6072: 6065: 6064: 6055: 6053: 6049: 6045: 6041: 6034: 6030: 6026: 6021: 6020: 6016: 6012: 6007: 6005: 6001: 5997: 5990: 5985: 5984: 5980: 5976: 5972: 5968: 5964: 5957: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5945: 5941: 5935: 5931: 5927: 5923: 5919: 5899: 5896: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5882: 5879: 5878: 5875: 5870: 5863: 5859: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5824: 5820: 5816: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5806: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5777: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5767: 5763: 5759: 5755: 5751: 5747: 5740: 5735: 5734: 5730: 5726: 5722: 5718: 5708: 5705: 5704: 5700: 5696: 5692: 5683: 5682: 5678: 5674: 5667: 5662: 5661: 5657: 5653: 5645: 5638: 5635: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5622: 5618: 5614: 5604: 5603: 5599: 5595: 5590: 5588: 5584: 5579: 5571: 5570: 5567: 5566: 5553: 5548: 5547: 5542: 5531: 5530: 5526: 5522: 5515: 5511: 5507: 5502: 5499:If you care, 5498: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5481: 5479: 5477: 5475: 5473: 5471: 5468: 5463: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5438: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5405: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5383: 5376: 5369: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5345: 5335: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5314: 5313: 5310: 5307: 5304: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5289: 5273: 5269: 5265: 5261: 5257: 5253: 5249: 5248:Noah Weinberg 5245: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5231: 5228: 5227: 5224: 5219: 5212: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5199: 5195: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5180: 5176: 5169: 5168: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5152: 5149: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5115: 5114:Noah Weinberg 5110: 5109: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5085: 5081: 5077: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5066: 5061: 5058:Hi Jayjg, an 5051: 5050: 5046: 5042: 5032: 5025: 5020: 5016: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4998: 4994: 4991: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4966: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4948:Temple Israel 4942: 4941:Temple Israel 4937: 4933: 4929: 4921: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4909: 4908: 4907:Did you know? 4903: 4899: 4896: 4892: 4891: 4879: 4876: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4853: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4837: 4831: 4830: 4826: 4822: 4818: 4808: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4795: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4761: 4754: 4750: 4744: 4738: 4732: 4727: 4718: 4717: 4713: 4709: 4703: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4690: 4687: 4686: 4682: 4678: 4674: 4670: 4659: 4655: 4651: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4639: 4634: 4626: 4625: 4622: 4618: 4603: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4584: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4574: 4570: 4560: 4557: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4543: 4542: 4538: 4535: 4534: 4524: 4523: 4518: 4512: 4511: 4509: 4501: 4492: 4489: 4483: 4480: 4479: 4459: 4453: 4447: 4446: 4441: 4440: 4435: 4430: 4426: 4425: 4417: 4416: 4412: 4408: 4404: 4394: 4391: 4388: 4386: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4355: 4351: 4346: 4345: 4342: 4338: 4334: 4327: 4326:Yehudi (name) 4322: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4303: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4281: 4276: 4272: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4256:indulging in 4255: 4251: 4250: 4249:460 kilobytes 4245: 4244: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4214: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4177: 4174:POV edits on 4171: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4148: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4138:72.179.45.108 4135: 4131: 4127: 4123: 4121: 4117: 4110: 4105: 4104: 4100: 4097: 4094: 4090: 4085: 4084: 4080: 4077: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4058: 4053: 4052: 4048: 4045: 4042: 4038: 4037:Malik Shabazz 4031: 4026: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4007: 4006: 4003: 4000: 3997: 3992: 3989: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3938: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3918: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3895: 3881: 3867: 3857: 3853: 3830: 3806: 3801: 3793: 3788: 3775: 3774: 3763: 3762: 3759: 3756: 3751: 3746: 3739: 3733: 3727: 3712: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3688: 3686: 3676: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3666:24.21.105.252 3664: 3654: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3628: 3622: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3612:Bali ultimate 3605: 3600: 3599: 3596: 3591: 3590: 3583: 3580: 3577: 3569: 3568: 3565: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3539: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3527: 3526: 3525:Did you know? 3521: 3517: 3513: 3510: 3506: 3505: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3452: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3405: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3388: 3376: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3343: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3288: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3254: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3213: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3190: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3175: 3164: 3163: 3160: 3153:Feliz Navidad 3146: 3143: 3140: 3137: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3117: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3103: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3089: 3086: 3082: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3072: 3068: 3066: 3063: 3059: 3057: 3055: 3051: 3049: 3047: 3045: 3043: 3041: 3039: 3037: 3035: 3033: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3020: 3018: 3016: 3014: 3012: 3010: 3008: 3006: 3004: 3002: 3000: 2998: 2996: 2994: 2992: 2989: 2988:removal of it 2985: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2964: 2960: 2955: 2952: 2950: 2948: 2946: 2944: 2942: 2940: 2938: 2936: 2934: 2932: 2930: 2928: 2926: 2924: 2922: 2920: 2918: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2897: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2876: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2829: 2826: 2822: 2817: 2814: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2792:Breslov pages 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2769: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2755: 2754:step in WP:DR 2751: 2748: 2746: 2744: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2664: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2639: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2601:Oh, Carol.... 2598: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2570: 2564: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2406: 2403: 2396: 2394: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2383: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2323:Rahm Emmanuel 2320: 2318: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2300: 2299: 2277: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2249: 2241: 2236: 2234: 2222: 2219: 2213: 2209: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2157: 2155: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2134: 2128: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2094:70.112.79.217 2092: 2086: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2028:email request 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1992: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1975: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960:Thermoproteus 1957: 1953: 1949: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1911: 1910: 1909:Did you know? 1905: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1849: 1844: 1843: 1838: 1836: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1813:Bill Chadwell 1806: 1803: 1800: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1786: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1723: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1695: 1690: 1688: 1682: 1680: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1661: 1659: 1653: 1651: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1634: 1632: 1626: 1624: 1609: 1607: 1603: 1596: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1571: 1566: 1563: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1481: 1478: 1473: 1470: 1464: 1461:I replied on 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1449: 1446: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1409:word to avoid 1405: 1400: 1398: 1394: 1387: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1351: 1343: 1333: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1298:Royal Lineage 1295: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266:Riyadi.asmawi 1263: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1245:Postlethwaite 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1207: 1206: 1201: 1195: 1190: 1188: 1182: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1171: 1166: 1164: 1159: 1156: 1151: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1069: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1036: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1020: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 995: 988: 984: 980: 976: 973: 972: 971: 970: 966: 962: 958: 949: 946: 942: 936: 932: 928: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 896: 889: 879: 872: 868: 867: 866: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 842: 837: 836: 833: 831: 830: 809: 805: 795: 794: 790: 786: 783: 779: 772: 767: 766: 763: 749: 745: 741: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 704: 701: 695: 689: 684: 679: 678: 677: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 649: 633: 630: 626: 623:, not on the 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 568: 567: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 547: 544: 540: 535: 529: 525: 521: 514: 509: 507: 503: 499: 492: 491: 490: 487: 483: 482: 481: 477: 473: 465: 464: 463: 460: 455: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 410: 399: 398: 394: 390: 379: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 351: 350: 346: 342: 332: 331: 327: 323: 319: 312: 302: 298: 294: 290: 284: 283: 282: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 263: 259: 255: 254:75.76.187.142 251: 238: 237: 233: 229: 218: 217: 213: 209: 200: 189: 188: 184: 180: 170: 169: 165: 161: 156: 151: 143: 133: 130: 128: 126: 120: 116: 113: 109: 108: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6236: 6214: 6191:. Thanks, -- 6186: 6144: 6089:Noam Chomsky 6082: 6067: 6059: 6056: 6037: 6008: 5993: 5960: 5937: 5917: 5915: 5877:(yada, yada) 5865: 5862:User:Pedrito 5857: 5743: 5714: 5706: 5689: 5670: 5648: 5610: 5591: 5580: 5577: 5561: 5556: 5537: 5518: 5464: 5446: 5411: 5389: 5372: 5348:Wikifan12345 5341: 5338:Added source 5320: 5298: 5285: 5256:WP:Consensus 5226:(yada, yada) 5214: 5191: 5173: 5118: 5093: 5057: 5038: 5012: 4979: 4945: 4912: 4911: 4905: 4857:Wikiwatcher1 4854: 4840: 4814: 4791: 4774: 4704: 4691: 4688: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4635: 4633:Hi Fayssal, 4632: 4617:Slrubenstein 4613: 4566: 4558: 4544: 4539: 4536: 4530: 4507: 4506: 4497: 4484: 4464: 4460: 4444: 4443: 4437: 4436: 4400: 4358: 4337:Slrubenstein 4330: 4309: 4289: 4266:David Wilson 4257: 4253: 4248: 4242: 4232:I hope that 4215: 4199: 4180: 4154: 4151:Solzhenitsyn 4113: 4095: 4086: 4075: 4061: 4043: 4034: 4013: 3985: 3944: 3924: 3904: 3831: 3808: 3804: 3766: 3757: 3734:| Design by 3725:The Barnstar 3689: 3682: 3660: 3632: 3608: 3585: 3584: 3581: 3578: 3576:Dear Jayjg, 3575: 3561: 3530: 3529: 3523: 3448: 3413: 3410:Anti-Zionism 3384: 3344: 3321: 3291: 3275: 3257: 3237: 3219: 3196: 3170: 3156: 3131:lead section 3126: 3115: 3101: 3087: 3029:User:Pedrito 2962: 2958: 2900: 2858: 2852: 2850: 2830: 2824: 2795: 2775: 2740: 2721: 2665: 2642: 2604: 2587: 2573: 2554:CarolMooreDC 2541: 2539: 2501:CarolMooreDC 2475:CarolMooreDC 2473:How's that! 2448:CarolMooreDC 2392: 2365:CarolMooreDC 2333: 2326: 2307: 2280: 2256:(yada, yada) 2244: 2237: 2229: 2211: 2178:CarolMooreDC 2174: 2153: 2151: 2140:At this diff 2138: 2110: 2089: 2080:Historicist 2066: 2031: 2006:Historicist 1993: 1991:Historicist 1978: 1945: 1914: 1913: 1907: 1863:Jewish power 1852: 1834: 1828: 1819: 1781: 1750: 1727: 1700: 1686: 1678: 1657: 1649: 1630: 1622: 1615: 1599: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1489: 1468: 1463:my talk page 1444: 1439:puppetmaster 1418: 1403: 1401: 1390: 1373:Slrubenstein 1370: 1367:2nd intafada 1338: 1326: 1304: 1290: 1282: 1259: 1239: 1213: 1191: 1183: 1176: 1167: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1095:Historicist 1080: 1076: 1071: 1067: 1065: 1042: 1023: 998: 955: 925: 845: 813: 801: 775: 758: 712: 682: 652: 648:WP:Help desk 624: 620: 612: 553:circumcision 429: 421: 417: 405: 385: 361:my talk page 357: 338: 315: 311:Anti-Zionism 244: 224: 195: 192:Circumcision 179:Lazulilasher 176: 154: 146: 78: 43: 37: 6211:Not my edit 6169:Historicist 6151:Historicist 5830:MeteorMaker 5779:MeteorMaker 5429:Tundrabuggy 5414:Tundrabuggy 5344:Brad Delson 5334:Treesheads 5260:WP:Civility 5004:Neo-Zionist 4850:Sergey Brin 4794:re-added it 3737:L'Aquatique 3685:Comical Ali 3679:St. Pancake 3516:30 December 3456:—Preceding 3081:MeteorMaker 2894:Reverts at 2779:Tundrabuggy 2697:—Preceding 2548:talk page. 2070:Historicist 2023:Historicist 2013:Historicist 1996:Historicist 1981:Historicist 1859:antisemitic 1728:A good egg 1612:USS Liberty 1397:resubmitted 1386:David Bukay 1114:Historicist 1104:Historicist 1085:Historicist 979:Peter cohen 952:Censorship? 939:—Preceding 878:Banned user 802:Hi, Jayjg! 625:contributor 287:—Preceding 248:—Preceding 36:This is an 6261:Coppertwig 6233:Nicely put 6027:regarding 5973:. Thanks, 5940:Deborahjay 5934:good faith 5739:Alon Shvut 5715:Regarding 5506:arimareiji 5391:Contact me 5387:template. 5324:Treesheads 5244:Treesheads 5194:Treesheads 5175:Treesheads 5156:Treesheads 5140:Treesheads 5121:Treesheads 4821:Joseph3333 4798:arimareiji 4563:Categories 4407:Rockybiggs 4035:Thanks. — 3968:arimareiji 3953:arimareiji 3203:arimareiji 2657:nanach.net 2085:Zaid Hamid 1900:3 December 1835:Sandstein 1423:with only 1224:PhilKnight 1199:SlimVirgin 922:a bad user 888:Sockpuppet 778:Talk:Irgun 740:Coppertwig 683:appearence 667:EdJohnston 574:Coppertwig 520:Coppertwig 498:Coppertwig 472:Coppertwig 443:Coppertwig 208:Coppertwig 103:RfA thanks 95:Archive 30 90:Archive 29 85:Archive 28 79:Archive 27 73:Archive 26 68:Archive 25 60:Archive 20 6239:this post 6044:West Bank 6029:West Bank 5967:talk page 5922:Talk page 5673:Gilabrand 5574:Thank you 5564:Shankbone 5395:Stepheng3 4983:Hi JayJg, 4956:Arxiloxos 4952:WP:MOSDAB 4736:rootology 4721:thank you 4403:WP:CANVAS 4258:vandalism 4234:this edit 4183:Gilabrand 4089:Illxchild 4069:Illxchild 3706:Thank you 3691:Thanks!-- 3401:Dispenser 3159:SqueakBox 3095:Nishidani 2880:Guettarda 2668:talk page 1930:BorgQueen 1871:Neverfake 1869:? Thanks. 1542:Ironholds 1528:Ironholds 1500:Ironholds 1421:an editor 1187:Astronomy 1049:Gatoclass 1045:this edit 1039:Apologies 595:Blackworm 557:Blackworm 548:, yours: 539:this edit 274:vandalism 228:inigmatus 203:Regards, 173:Thank you 6057:Cheers, 6025:WP:RfArb 5930:just now 5844:Tkalisky 5823:WP:UNDUE 5801:Tkalisky 5762:Tkalisky 5633:IronDuke 5617:NoCal100 5408:Re email 5375:this one 4985:Given : 4928:Dravecky 4708:Telaviv1 4693:Telaviv1 4677:Telaviv1 4649:FayssalF 4547:Bounce78 4099:contribs 4079:contribs 4047:contribs 3941:PR again 3894:FloNight 3693:Cerejota 3657:Opinion? 3546:Dravecky 3470:contribs 3458:unsigned 3325:WP:CIVIL 3310:WP:CIVIL 3119:contribs 3105:contribs 3091:contribs 2711:contribs 2699:unsigned 2490:IronDuke 2464:IronDuke 2381:IronDuke 2339:IronDuke 2313:IronDuke 2217:IronDuke 2117:NoCal100 2063:Question 2049:Chesdovi 2047:Thanks! 2034:Chesdovi 1948:WP:SYNTH 1823:contribs 1765:PSWG1920 1436:prolific 1404:arguably 1308:contribs 1294:contribs 908:Terraxos 856:Terraxos 785:NoCal100 762:Ynhockey 719:Zargulon 699:contribs 688:Jayron32 591:WP:CIVIL 438:Cheers, 363:, or on 322:CJCurrie 289:unsigned 250:unsigned 155:sub rosa 6125:Yoninah 6093:Yoninah 6062:pedrito 6052:Samaria 5819:WP:NCGN 5815:WP:NPOV 5797:Samarea 5754:Samarea 5746:Pedrito 5652:Snowded 5299:greatly 5264:Yoninah 5125:Yoninah 5097:WP:AN/I 5035:Samaria 5015:Ceedjee 4729:My RFA 4610:advice? 4545:Yours, 4361:Ceedjee 4312:Doright 4293:Doright 4243:6 hours 4219:Doright 4204:Doright 4161:Galassi 4016:Sandahl 3982:Samaria 3908:Untwirl 3715:sango15 3636:WP:NPOV 3629:-notice 3625:RFC at 3588:Majorly 3486:Galassi 3329:WP:Tend 3109:Pedrito 2914:Samaria 2834:Yoninah 2821:WP:SOAP 2737:Request 2724:Yoninah 2393:Arcayne 2150:noting 2133:WP:OTRS 2113:an AN/I 1730:told me 1399:today. 1256:Ar wiki 1131:Ravpapa 1043:...for 1026:Ravpapa 1004:Yoninah 941:undated 806:at the 715:Docking 709:Docking 663:WP:DUCK 621:content 369:Zlerman 341:Eustace 39:archive 6112:Jayjg 6011:Tznkai 5895:Jayjg 5873:crewer 5306:(talk) 5222:crewer 5101:Jmabel 4846:WP:3RR 4638:Jayjg 4461:Peace, 4392:& 4134:WP:SYN 4130:Israel 4057:Israel 3731:My RFA 3627:WP:NOR 3462:Lute88 3387:Jayjg 3381:PDFbot 3372:Jayjg 3368:WP:NOR 3314:Jayjg 3284:Jayjg 3250:Jayjg 3216:Enough 3174:Daniel 3071:Jayjg 3062:Jayjg 2854:Justin 2623:Smerus 2608:Smerus 2584:Suntag 2329:" she 2252:crewer 2131:Jayjg 1757:WP:SPS 1734:G-Dett 1679:Narson 1650:Narson 1623:Narson 1580:TensaZ 1284:Fctedt 629:Jayjg 617:WP:NPA 543:WP:AGF 486:Jayjg 459:Jayjg 278:Jayjg 270:WP:OWN 160:Risker 124:Thingg 6243:Jakew 6200:talk 6048:Judea 5793:Judea 5750:Judea 5686:Help? 5559:David 5041:Shuki 4510:levse 4331:Does 3892:From 3834:From 3564:MONGO 3449:User 3199:WP:TP 1716:Smile 1476:vecia 1452:vecia 1434:as a 1432:noted 1428:edits 1332:clear 1216:WP:AE 959:edit 142:WP:AE 16:< 6265:talk 6247:talk 6224:talk 6173:talk 6155:talk 6129:talk 6097:talk 6070:talk 6050:and 6046:vs. 6031:vs. 6015:talk 5996:here 5979:talk 5944:talk 5926:page 5868:brew 5848:talk 5834:talk 5821:and 5805:talk 5795:and 5783:talk 5766:talk 5752:and 5729:talk 5721:here 5717:this 5699:talk 5677:talk 5656:talk 5621:talk 5613:this 5598:talk 5525:talk 5510:talk 5501:this 5490:talk 5457:talk 5433:talk 5418:talk 5399:talk 5362:Meh. 5352:talk 5328:talk 5268:talk 5217:brew 5213:. -- 5198:talk 5179:talk 5160:talk 5144:talk 5129:talk 5105:Talk 5080:talk 5045:talk 5019:talk 4960:talk 4932:talk 4861:talk 4825:talk 4802:talk 4712:talk 4697:talk 4681:talk 4621:Talk 4598:talk 4551:talk 4516:Talk 4488:here 4411:talk 4365:talk 4352:and 4341:Talk 4333:this 4316:talk 4297:talk 4275:cont 4271:talk 4223:talk 4208:talk 4187:talk 4165:talk 4142:talk 4093:talk 4073:talk 4041:talk 4020:talk 4010:Back 3972:talk 3957:talk 3932:talk 3912:talk 3697:talk 3670:talk 3648:talk 3616:talk 3594:talk 3550:talk 3520:2008 3490:talk 3466:talk 3435:talk 3420:talk 3353:talk 3337:talk 3298:talk 3264:talk 3227:talk 3207:talk 3127:only 3113:talk 3099:talk 3085:talk 2884:talk 2860:talk 2838:talk 2815:and 2783:talk 2728:talk 2707:talk 2674:and 2627:talk 2612:talk 2558:talk 2505:talk 2479:talk 2452:talk 2369:talk 2351:JIDF 2247:brew 2202:talk 2182:talk 2121:talk 2098:talk 2074:talk 2053:talk 2038:talk 2017:talk 2000:talk 1985:talk 1964:talk 1934:talk 1904:2008 1875:talk 1817:talk 1769:talk 1761:here 1751:Per 1738:talk 1707:talk 1687:Talk 1658:Talk 1631:Talk 1584:talk 1546:talk 1532:talk 1522:and 1504:talk 1471:enna 1447:enna 1425:five 1377:Talk 1302:talk 1288:talk 1270:talk 1242:Ryan 1228:talk 1179:here 1150:WP:V 1135:talk 1129:. -- 1108:talk 1089:talk 1070:and 1053:talk 1030:talk 1008:talk 983:talk 965:talk 935:talk 912:talk 860:talk 789:talk 744:talk 723:talk 693:talk 671:talk 615:and 599:talk 578:talk 561:talk 524:talk 502:talk 476:talk 447:talk 409:this 393:talk 389:Dmcq 373:talk 345:talk 326:talk 297:talk 258:talk 232:talk 212:talk 199:here 183:talk 164:talk 148:and 6218:. 6121:CfD 5938:-- 5936:!. 5918:not 5858:any 5695:THF 5258:or 5065:Tom 4900:On 4875:Tom 4619:| 4583:Tom 4573:Tom 4339:| 4254:not 4030:Jew 3827:‎ 3640:RFC 3514:On 3107:), 3093:), 2963:for 2959:not 2825:All 2756:?-- 2578:of 2146:to 2107:ANI 1898:On 1799:Mgm 1785:Mgm 1604:of 1570:not 1375:| 1357:Man 1312:Mgm 1189:)? 937:) 755:RfA 428:); 407:Re 318:3RR 6267:) 6249:) 6226:) 6175:) 6157:) 6131:) 6123:. 6099:) 6066:- 6017:) 6006:. 5981:) 5946:) 5850:) 5836:) 5825:, 5817:, 5807:) 5785:) 5768:) 5731:) 5723:. 5711:AE 5701:) 5679:) 5658:) 5623:) 5600:) 5589:. 5541:BJ 5527:) 5512:) 5492:) 5459:) 5435:) 5420:) 5401:) 5385:}} 5379:{{ 5354:) 5330:) 5270:) 5254:, 5200:) 5181:) 5162:) 5146:) 5131:) 5103:| 5082:) 5060:ip 5047:) 5021:) 4962:) 4934:) 4922:. 4904:, 4863:) 4827:) 4819:-- 4804:) 4751:) 4745:)( 4714:) 4699:) 4683:) 4652:- 4600:) 4553:) 4519:• 4513:• 4504:— 4482:~ 4413:) 4405:-- 4367:) 4318:) 4299:) 4273:· 4225:) 4210:) 4189:) 4167:) 4159:? 4144:) 4136:). 4101:) 4081:) 4049:) 4022:) 4002:ka 3999:on 3996:El 3974:) 3959:) 3934:) 3926:-- 3914:) 3844:do 3841:es 3838:Ch 3824:ח! 3812:שׂ 3728:| 3699:) 3672:) 3650:) 3618:) 3552:) 3540:. 3522:, 3518:, 3492:) 3472:) 3468:• 3437:) 3422:) 3370:. 3355:) 3339:) 3312:. 3300:) 3282:. 3266:) 3244:: 3229:) 3209:) 3142:ka 3139:on 3136:El 3134:-- 2974:ka 2971:on 2968:El 2886:) 2840:) 2785:) 2764:ka 2761:on 2758:El 2730:) 2713:) 2709:• 2629:) 2614:) 2606:-- 2560:) 2507:) 2481:) 2454:) 2400:() 2371:) 2235:. 2204:) 2184:) 2127:i 2123:) 2100:) 2076:) 2055:) 2040:) 2019:) 2002:) 1987:) 1966:) 1936:) 1924:. 1906:, 1902:, 1877:) 1771:) 1740:) 1709:) 1691:• 1683:~ 1675:-- 1662:• 1654:~ 1646:-- 1635:• 1627:~ 1619:-- 1586:) 1548:) 1534:) 1518:, 1506:) 1465:. 1341:TN 1335:}} 1329:{{ 1272:) 1230:) 1222:. 1196:. 1181:. 1137:) 1110:) 1091:) 1055:) 1032:) 1010:) 985:) 967:) 914:) 906:. 891:}} 885:{{ 881:}} 875:{{ 862:) 854:. 791:) 746:) 738:☺ 736:. 725:) 673:) 611:: 601:) 580:) 572:☺ 563:) 526:) 515:. 504:) 478:) 449:) 436:). 416:; 395:) 375:) 347:) 328:) 299:) 260:) 234:) 214:) 185:) 166:) 64:← 6263:( 6258:☺ 6245:( 6222:( 6197:| 6171:( 6153:( 6127:( 6095:( 6013:( 5977:( 5942:( 5846:( 5832:( 5803:( 5781:( 5764:( 5727:( 5697:( 5675:( 5654:( 5619:( 5596:( 5523:( 5508:( 5488:( 5455:( 5431:( 5416:( 5397:( 5350:( 5326:( 5266:( 5196:( 5177:( 5158:( 5142:( 5127:( 5078:( 5043:( 5017:( 4999:) 4958:( 4930:( 4859:( 4823:( 4800:( 4748:T 4742:C 4739:( 4710:( 4695:( 4679:( 4596:( 4549:( 4508:R 4490:. 4477:e 4475:s 4473:v 4470:e 4467:l 4465:R 4454:! 4448:, 4409:( 4363:( 4314:( 4295:( 4277:) 4269:( 4264:— 4221:( 4206:( 4202:] 4185:( 4163:( 4140:( 4132:( 4096:· 4091:( 4076:· 4071:( 4044:· 4039:( 4018:( 3970:( 3955:( 3930:( 3910:( 3850:i 3847:v 3821:‎ 3818:מ 3815:‎ 3769:— 3695:( 3668:( 3646:( 3614:( 3548:( 3488:( 3464:( 3433:( 3418:( 3351:( 3335:( 3296:( 3262:( 3225:( 3205:( 3183:+ 3180:T 3177:/ 3116:· 3111:( 3102:· 3097:( 3088:· 3083:( 2882:( 2836:( 2781:( 2726:( 2705:( 2625:( 2610:( 2590:☼ 2556:( 2503:( 2477:( 2450:( 2367:( 2297:t 2294:u 2291:m 2288:a 2285:i 2282:T 2200:( 2180:( 2119:( 2096:( 2072:( 2051:( 2036:( 2015:( 1998:( 1983:( 1962:( 1932:( 1873:( 1825:) 1820:· 1815:( 1801:| 1787:| 1767:( 1736:( 1705:( 1582:( 1544:( 1530:( 1502:( 1469:ل 1445:ل 1354:- 1349:X 1344:‑ 1314:| 1305:· 1300:( 1291:· 1286:( 1268:( 1226:( 1133:( 1106:( 1087:( 1083:. 1051:( 1028:( 1006:( 981:( 963:( 947:. 933:( 910:( 858:( 828:l 825:a 822:m 819:a 817:h 815:C 787:( 742:( 721:( 696:. 690:. 669:( 597:( 576:( 559:( 522:( 517:☺ 500:( 495:☺ 474:( 469:☺ 445:( 440:☺ 432:( 424:( 391:( 371:( 343:( 324:( 295:( 256:( 230:( 210:( 205:☺ 181:( 162:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index