3469:
31:
1805:. I'm not particularly well-versed with IPv6 yet, but I can tell you this rule of thumb: Comcast, Time-Warner RoadRunner, AT&T U-verse and many other residential ISPs allocate a /64 block of IPv6 addresses to each customer. Since this is RoadRunner, it is probably safe to say that the customer's IP address is 2605:e000:96c0:af00::/64, so it can be blocked without affecting anyone outside their household. For some basics of IPv6, you might want to take a look at
3416:
1517:
officiousness that was going on in that thread may not have been germane to this RfA, but it would have been worth dealing with anyway. All you said was that it isn't a block reason. That's true, but an editor who objects to a user's real name because one of its syllables coincides with a nasty word in
English (not the language of the real name) needs dealing with. That's a bit more important than keeping the RfA pristine, isn't it? Cheers, --
1087:
850:
390:
547:. That's not constructive. that is you making a personal attack. That's your personal opinion about conduct, not a discussion about a specific edit as it pertains to a policy. Then you come here and use words like "douchbaggery" and "jerk". I'm sure DoRD will be able to explain to you why you've handled this wrong from the start. On top of all of this, I haven't edited that article since Sept. Breezing into my page
1996:
1782:
1828:
that many. BTW, according to the WHOIS, Time Warner allocated 2605:E000::/32, which is an even higher number. I started reading Jasper's page, and, as usual, I followed it in the beginning and then get lost because most of these kinds of pages skip steps they assume you already know. It seems to say that a range block of /64 is okay at one point, but then I lost the thread when I plowed on.--
3754:
That's
Elizabeth Grey and Josh. As to my account page I did copy some of the template from another user and I'm happy to update, I thought I was following a standard. Happy to arrange a call or Skype or to write a letter to prove I am indeed a real person... Im a Monthy Python fan too! Especially meaning of life. Thank you for your consideration,
2880:. Can we please have his current IP Range blocked for 1-2 months? Even if it takes multiple rangeblocks to cover his current IP Range, his history of editing and his current pattern of vandalism/sockpuppeteering certainly warrants this. If a rangeblock wouldn't work, then we need to take this to the Wikimedia Stewards.
3891:
position to block those who do not agree with him. This might have something I see on his Talk page - he is employed by the
European Comission - which should make him more careful when editing critics of the European Comission? Can I report this abuse of an administrator's position please? AyreSmith1
3045:
Heh, I didn't even see that, so should I still stick with the Soap account or make Keep the master on everything? And while I'm waiting your response, forgive me for asking sort of the same question I asked earlier, but as the report is now archived, can I just move the report and the archive will go
2026:
My apologies for the frivolous Sock Puppet report. I am sorry to have wasted everyone's time, I truly am. It was not my intention. I seem to have misunderstood the process. If somebody would be so kind as to visit my talk page and suggest how I should best proceed about this IP editor, I would really
1976:
People know the sockmaster as "Doctorlaw", so that's why I said that, but I'm not able to dig into the case at the moment (I'm stuck on my iPad for the weekend) so I could be giving less than optimal advice. ;) As for the move, yes, I suppose the move subpages option would work. You'd want to leave a
1842:
Yes, the IPv6 address space is so large (2) that it is inconsequential to allocate a /64 to one customer, and when I see a need to block an IPv6 address like I mentioned above, I almost always nuke the entire /64 because blocking a single address (out of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 available) is bound
751:
Yes, that's all very nice, but I'm here to ask questions about what is acceptable behaviour or not. So what does it have to do with anything? You're responding to every last message defensively, as if you think I'm here to complain to the Head Master. Kindly stop. I'm just looking for my answers, and
609:
If the attitude and the language he used there are perfectly acceptable on wikipedia I can accept that as an answer and I can adjust my expectations of wikipedia accordingly. I just wanted to run it by an admin to check, rather than to just assume things. I appreciate the time you're taking to clear
153:
Well, after going back over the evidence, I have had to change my conclusions in the case. I'm not very familiar with Sinbad Barron, either, but I did see one possible connection from Cannot be detected. However, the account's contributions and some other technical evidence point squarely at
Evlekis,
4408:
Ahh...yes, your SPI link would have been useful in that situation. I have made a couple of slight modifications to your idea and left it in the sandbox. I know I've solved this problem before, but the answer is escaping me at the moment - your version leaves a space before the closing parenthesis if
4089:
Sorry about your keyboard. Way back in ancient times, a computer operator spilled a cup of coffee that he had set down on the top of a mainframe computer belonging to a large company. The shit (coffee grounds) hit the (computer) fan and caused $ 1M in damage, which included downtime of the computer.
2961:
Sucks for us. But if the vandalism continues, or even worsens, this sort of action would need to be taken if it truly is the only way to make him stop. By the way, is this guy rangeblocked right now? If he is, we might not see him again for a while. PS, the IP Range 192.0.0.0/3 had been rangeblocked
2498:
Without evidence that blocks have been evaded, simply threatening to change IP addresses isn't sockpuppetry. There are hundreds or thousands of editors using that ISP, so there is no way we can sift through all their contributions to find out if the threat has been carried out. If you find evidence,
2299:
Okay, I'm pretty sure that X96lee15 is aware that you object to the edits by
Dragonron and their socks, but it is also clear that X96lee15 objects to you removing the edits from their talk page. My suggestion to you is to stop watching X96lee15's talk page. Dragonron is posting there simply to annoy
2054:
apology really wasn't necessary. Looking through the anon's contributions, it is pretty clear that they are not new to the project, but beyond that, I have no idea who it might be. By logging out to edit, the editors you mentioned in your report would have little to gain, but much to lose if caught.
1827:
When I use 2605:E000::/64 in your calculator, it says the number of IPs affected is 18446744073709551616. Is that to be read as a "normal" number? If so, it's staggering. Am I missing something, or it just that there are so many IP addresses available, it's not that big a deal for an ISP to allocate
1063:
I've listed the accounts from oldest to newest. The only support I have for possible sock puppetry is the SPA-like behavior in the article, the edit warring, and the fact that accounts keep popping up as the article gets more and more push-back from experienced editors. I can't act on my own because
770:
You've heard a couple of answers: Two admins have told you that your conduct is out of line. One of them directly said he didn't see anything wrong with what I did on that talk page. And why would I be defensive? It's not like you've engaged in personal attacks. Oh wait, you DID, more than once. Put
3661:
Eh... I'm not saying that I don't. There weren't any blocks that last time I checked (February 6), and the Active
Rangeblock list was outdated, so I really had no way of knowing. I just wanted to make sure, because I was very concerned I saw that some of the last few rangeblocks expired on the 5th,
1961:
Hmm, I'm happy not to change the master - less work for me - but I'm curious why you think it should remain as is. Rschen has now archved the report, but I'd like a little more explanation for the future. Are you saying I would have done two separate moves, archives first? I remember when I started
2653:
we can do to stop him? Are rangeblocks (or global blocks for that matter) actually useless against his current IP Range? There has to be something else we can do besides sitting there and waiting for him to make his next move. From his history of editing, it has taken long-term
Rangeblocks to stop
3753:
Hi there, apparently I was flagged as a sock puppet. Please can you investigate and look me up anywhere including tens of mentions of me attending conferences and being a real person? I'm not sure why someone tried to edit my account page, and I did notice my coworkers indeed using the same IP.
2987:
as the master. Yet, there is no report for
Soapamalkanmaime and thus there's no link to the correct report on the user pages. I'd like to move the report to Soapamalkanmaime as the master and then change the few tags there are for Mr Yoke Llully to Soapamalkanmaime so everything is consistent. In
3890:
I see you blocked my account AyreSmith on the instigation of
Peregrine981. He claimed there had been no discussion of changes to Open Europe. On the contrary there is a whole discussion including me and others on teh Talk page but Peregrine981 has consistently reversed the edits and abused his
3361:
were both marked as confirmed by
Tiptoety and I blocked them. They have each posted unblock requests claiming that it is a false positive as they are coworkers and share the same IP for that reason. I'm hesitant to unblock at this point since I can't verify whether their explanations match the
990:
command, and that their edit summaries are almost the same as the ones from you when you moved the page. I'll say it again: Just because two editors disagree with you doesn't mean that there is sockpuppetry involved. However, if you still feel like pursuing this, you must file a case as I have
3593:
Could we please have a rangeblock enforced on this guy's IP Range (if possible)? Even if we have to resort to using multiple separate blocks to cover his current IP Range, I believe that it would be well worth the effort if it could be done, because he isn't letting up, and because he is also
1769:
There has been a fair amount of block evasion from IPs of the master. I haven't yet blocked the latest IP, although I'm prepared to do that as it's obvious. However, I'm trying to determine whether a range block is justified, what it should be if so, and what the impact would be. According to
1865:
do you issue a range block. None of the pages I've looked at tells you the mechanics for administrators. From looking at your log, I'm guessing that in the address to be blocked I stick in "2605:e000:96c0:af00::/64" without the quotation marks. Is that right? Is there anything else I need to
432:
There are two reasons I don't bother tagging most LTA socks: WP:DENY and because there are simply so many of them. DENY isn't really in play with this guy, he's just very persistent about getting his imaginary record company into the encyclopedia, so feel free to tag them if you wish. These
1880:
That's correct. You can specify anything from the abbreviated notation (2605:e000:96c0:af00::/64 up through a full address (2605:E000:96C0:AF00:C8DF:7C1A:6D08:71A8/64) and MediaWiki will do the rest. I don't know of any particularly good references, unfortunately, but here are the official
2758:
I'm sure that attention has a lot to do with it. However, if I stop, it wouldn't help anything. He was vandalizing long before I picked up on him, and he will still vandalize as often as he wants to, as long as he is able to create more socks. PS, the rangeblock calculator indicates that
126:
How did you make the Cognoscerapo - Sinbad Barron connection? I'd like to detect socks better, and I'm not very familiar with Sinbad Barron. Presumably Sinbad Barron is stale from a checkuser perspective so there are fewer privacy concerns, but if you're not allowed to say, you don't have
1516:
Hi DoRD. I really don't think you should have done that. In one edit, you simultaneously made your own comment and hatted the discussion. I'm sure you wouldn't have meant it like this, but be that as it may, that looks like grabbing the last word. Either discuss or hat, but not both. The
3064:, I'd go with Soapamalkanmaime so that I didn't have to retag the socks and rename the cats, but YMMV. And yeah, the "move subpages" checkbox should take care of the archive, but like I said before, you'll want to go back and nuke the archive redirect afterward since it is unneeded. —
1330:
Oh wait -- I just saw that my request was declined (though I can edit). What does this mean? Are my edits okay? I just think political terms don't belong in the first paragraph of entries on poets but in a "personal" section. Is this about that? B17 12:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
2477:!! What he is saying is that he will change his IP address to avoid blocks. Yes the two IP addresses have edited at completely different times and yes the first one is no longer blocked but I know that it is the same user through my experience. Surely if someone is admitting that:
134:. I'm certainly not criticising other people who have tried to identify sockmasters and clean up the mess - it's just that an environment with multiple overlapping sockmasters (and a few false-flag accounts) makes it very difficult to be certain of the owner 100% of the time...
2337:
I never watched his talk page. I would not be alerted to edits there if I did not go through sock account edits and find he's sent him a stupid warning about me. And I wouldn't revert if you didn't revert. The content should not be there and it should not matter who removes
2075:
Hi DoRD. You blocked me on June 16, 2013. My talk page and email got revoked by another admin called Elockid. I Know you think I might sock again but this is important: Can you restore iPhonehurricane95's talk and email because I need to submit an appeal at WP:BASC. Thanks,
2055:
Clearly the anon is at odds with you over gun control, but while their editing - particularly their edit summaries - may be contentious, I didn't see anything that looks like an attack to me. If their behavior escalates, I will be glad to look into it, though. Cheers —
1083:
Looking back in the article history, I see User:Khj0604, with the same "khj" as the first account above, but that is obviously a reference to the singer's name. As for these accounts, there is enough similarity in the behavior, so I checked and found that they are
3923:
or the conflicts surrounding the page, but you have now used at least a dozen different accounts to push your views on that and other pages. This account has also been blocked, and if you feel that I have used my tools improperly, feel free to contact the ArbCom
734:
I'm glad that you caught the not so subtle hint. Dragging up something that was resolved 3 months ago is usually not the norm. Many pages would have already archived that discussion. I'd also note that ES&L made a point of the issue being "ages ago" as well.
507:
a message about his behaviour that was just so horrible that I just could not resist speaking up. He responded by calling me a troll. So I do not think he'll respond to users calling him out on his behaviour. I'm not sure if there's a wikipedia policy handling
2672:
I have blocked mobile ranges before - one sockmaster forced me to block several ranges from this same mobile provider, in fact. I'm not willing, however, to block this particular range as it is far too busy. What was done in the past is not applicable today.
2617:
Rangeblocks in the past to stop his vandalism, once in February 2012, and another time in August 2013. At this point, I think that a 1-2 year rangeblock of his IP Range may be our only solution at this point, especially if IpH95 continued creating new socks.
808:) to user talk pages. The person linked to your user page in the signature and my talk page, so a person complained to me on my talk page despite me not having made the edit. They have been blocked. I have an idea who is responsible, but it's just a hunch. --
1991:
I try not to edit using touch screen devices I own. I'm always afraid I'll screw things up. There's a note in the case now that Globalprofessor is the oldest known confirmed account. I'm going to assume that your possible "less than optimal advice" is sound
717:
Niteshift36, thanks for repeatedly telling me it was 3 months ago. Though that really doesn't answer any of my questions plus I already knew this because conversations have dates on them. DoRD, would you say you agree with EatsShootsAndLeaves's conclusions?
4058:, and I just blocked two more. :\ Anyway, I had to replace my keyboard because someone (not to be named) spilled a beverage on it. I broke a fingertip practicing softball on Sunday, so my online activity may be somewhat reduced for the time being. —
154:
so I amended my statement. Granted, it is sometimes difficult to sort out the true master behind sock accounts, particularly with certain ISPs, but I took my best guess. Unfortunately, it was wrong this time. Thank you for prompting me about this. —
3362:
evidence, I think it would be best if a checkuser were to comment on that first. I've asked Tiptoety and another checkuser to comment on whether the evidence matches their explanations, but neither of them have done so. Could you look into it?
1107:
Sorry, I've been so busy with IP proxies that I didn't notice your response. Is it better to open a case rather than just block them? Seems to me I could block them based on the confirmation even though I'm involved. I'll do whatever you think
2722:
on IPhonehurricane95 and all of his associated sockpuppets and IP Ranges. If this doesn't work, then an admin should create a bot that automatically blocks/reverts the edits of any and all accounts originating from this sockmaster's IP Range.
3096:
moving the archive subpage, and it worked, but I was too chicken to try it, particularly because I wasn't sure how I would undo it if it didn't work. I've also changed all the puppets to point to the Soap account. Right or wrong, it's now
2513:
Even though he has admited that he has already changed his IP address in malice ? noting that he uses the word "again". Well it looks like again, once he gets going I will have to go through the procedure of reporting him to admin for
498:
2962:
by another admin before for 1 1/2 months, under 3 separate rangeblocks in February-March 2012, due to excessive vandalism and IP socking from IPhonehurricane95 (while he was operating under the username of Typhoonwikihelper).
629:
What you may not realize is that the person I was in a dispute with is an admin. He's perfectly capable of handling it and navigating the system. I'm sure that if he felt action was needed 3 months ago, he knows where to go.
2558:
You commented that the IP Address from which he was operating were very mobile. But wouldn't a rangeblock work on that IP Range? And if it can't, then I think that we need to take this to the Wikimedia Foundation Admins.
2420:
Yeah, I don't think that's what I had in mind - I'm thinking of something more recent. Anyway, this Cody and his friend were editing from a school, so it could just be the typical bored-kid-in-the-computer-lab vandalism.
2988:
fact, I have this problem when I block a new puppet on duck, which happened recently, without opening up the SPI. I tag them as Soapamalkanmaime, but each time it bothers me. Do you agree that I should do this? Thanks.--
2130:
I've seen blocks like that before, and I'm sure that the original block length was specified as 2 years, but for some reason, the software spits it out like that. I guess it's close enough, though. Strange bug, maybe?
1813:, if you're interested. As for seeing a range's contributions, as far as I can tell, the contributions gadget doesn't work for IPv6 addresses, and other than CU, I don't know any way of viewing them at one time. —
2188:
I looked at that account due to the suspicious username, but it appears that they are related to the blocked accounts in the recent Zarbon case. If you give me a username or IP, I will see what I can do about it.
599:
I apologize for making it sound like a personal attack. I suppose I let my emotions get the better of me. I am referring to his comments on the previously linked talk page. Here it is again for your convenience:
619:
532:
1931:
Can I move this to the correct master while it's both archived and not archived? I've never done it in that state before. I started to do it but then chickened out. The SPI clerk procedures don't address it
1778:. I'm not great with range blocks of IPv4 addresses, but at least I have a bit better grasp of it. I've never range blocked Pv6s. What do you suggest? Any extra tutoring on the issue would also be helpful (
1462:
I've had some further discussion with the editor (on her talk page). Can you check to see if her explanation of her editing history correlates to reality? Or is it all through Powerhouse Management IPs?—
2304:
that they consider removing the trolling when they see it. There is no harm in removing it, and as I said, its only purpose is to harass another editor. I know that this isn't an ideal solution, and my
3778:
1947:
Frankly, I'd leave it where it is unless there is some pressing need to move it it the older account. But yes, it can be done by moving the archive and the active case separately and then archiving. —
1664:
2940:
The whole point is that stewards would have to place such large rangeblocks as 192.0.0.0/3, 42.0.0.0/9, and 64.0.0.0/2 in order to get him to stop. And that is something that stewards definitely will
2837:
First off, the software won't let us block any ranges larger than /16, and even then, we only block that many addresses in cases of extreme abuse. So, no, those suggested blocks won't be happening. —
1770:
MediaWiki: "The best guideline for assessing collateral damage for an IPv6 rangeblock is to check the WHOIS and actual amount of activity from the range." The master appears to be always editing from
890:, the first user seems to be a newcoming in this case very relative to the second. Also, there is no particular reason for a user, but be suspicious for a likely sockpuppet to refer it for checking.--
311:
1268:
I am quite surprised with the outcome of the MfD against Ivan Clarin. Do you have a link for the background of your action (blocking for sockpuppetry) because I guess we will see that guy again.
221:
1356:
Hello again -- I was blocked for a few minutes and then I logged back in and can edit again. Could you explain if I am doing anything incorrect? B17 19:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC) thank you.
4076:? I didn't look at the characteristic edits of Gbgfbgfbgfb and their puppets, but there are the obvious letter-jumbling names that are very similar between the two masters. Also, what about
2263:
Could you also help me deal with the user who this guy keeps leaving messages? X96lee15 refuses to allow me to remove the trolling from his user talk because me doing so apparently violates
761:
580:
3831:
3781:(formerly Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Stuckos) has just filed an unblock request. I was wondering if you or DeltaQuad could take a look at it since the block was based on CU data.
3284:
Good question, but CU didn't give me the answer I was expecting. This account isn't even close technically or geographically to Dragonron, aka SweetPotatoSalad, TranquilityResides, etc. —
2145:
A bit like some of the early models of calculator - which would display 9.9999999 instead of 10 on some calculations. This block is at 67.187.21.48, who is combining whining and ranting.
4459:
4458:
The thing is, the two latest suspects are on different ranges than any of the confirmed socks, so I'm not sure what to make of them, but I'll try to take another look later today.
3017:
Okay...well, I suppose a move to that account would be fine since that is how the socks have been tagged and how the cats are named, but the oldest account I saw in the case was
2799:
I know, his IPs are all over the place, which makes it that much worse. However, blocking the following ranges would cover all of his IPs, and should still be just as effective:
1532:
Yes, you are correct. I went there intending to hat part of the discussion, but ended up commenting as well, so I will go ahead and unhide the discussion. Thanks for the note. —
2983:
because he's had more experience with this report, but he's been busy in real life and not active here for over two weeks. The problem is most of the puppets are blocked with
727:
686:
3481:
4171:
Ahh, I should've known...I missed it as well. He has been very busy lately, both here and on other projects. I'll take a look there in a bit, and thanks for the heads up —
3570:
1843:
to be ineffective. For practical purposes, you can consider an IPv6 /32 to be the same as an IPv4 /16 block, but CU is currently limited to checking /48. Jasper also has a
4436:
1448:
Thanks for letting me know, but it looks like the block is warranted. Just from their talk page edits, they seem to be very unfamiliar with how things work around here. —
1030:
585:
Indeed, your personal attack here is out of line, and I caution you against doing it again. In any case, I don't have any idea of what behavior you are referring to. —
3731:
No, I checked TranquilityResides as part of another investigation. Levineps has yet to be endorsed by a clerk, so I haven't taken much time to look at the evidence. —
3350:
2972:
1177:
780:
744:
639:
560:
2687:
You mean that this range changes too often? But if that's the case, isn't there something that we can do? Would taking this to the Wikimedia Foundation admins help?
2456:
753:
719:
611:
572:
524:
4421:
a case. Anyway, I do think that the idea is a good one, so if you can get the formatting right, please feel free to incorporate it into the live template. Cheers —
4337:
Would you be amenable to training me as a SPI Clerk, I know it's very busy and it needs assistance and I think that I am established enough to be able to help out.
305:
3662:
and when he returned to make more socks. But if he's blocked now, then I guess we're good for the time being. No new activity from him so far, as of early Feb 8.
4224:
3848:
3249:
1569:
657:
Well, I read about 2/3 of that talkpage ... still not sure what I'm looking for that would lead to "jerk" or "douchebaggery" suggestions. Nothing that violates
2492:
1962:
the move process thinking I would do one move that there was a box to move subpages (which I never check). Would checking that have allowed me to do one move?--
1068:. Rather than taking it to SPI (partly laziness), I thought I'd ask your views. It's possible that they are just meat puppets or even unrelated fans, but ... --
1762:
594:
1924:
1171:
448:
4437:
4376:, if you might have guessed how come I, someone without the tools felt the need to have a link to SPI case page of the blocked user, it was actually after
3242:
3833:
3256:
544:" You cited nothing specif, just came to my page, littering it with comments like "I can't resist letting you know how disgusted I am with your attitude"
4452:
4443:
Hey, DoRD, I pinged you on this. Perhaps you didn't see it or you don't wish to respond. I just need to know so it doesn't sit there in limbo. Thanks.--
3638:
3569:
Yeah, he went quiet for a while, but is back to creating a couple of socks a day again. :( Anyway, the abuse log entries for him, particularly those in
2523:
2115:
Is there a particular reason for a block of "1 year, 364 days, 18 hours, 10 minutes and 48 seconds"? Would it be different if a leap year came into it?
3811:
2973:
2997:
702:
3354:
3223:
2462:
693:
In the interest of saving time, a number of editors participated and the material was included in a way that satisfied both sides..... 3 months ago.
3607:
116:
3625:, etc. His February socks all have this naming scheme so far, and he will probably continue doing so in order to vandalize articles and to harass
2956:
2935:
2921:
2772:
2753:
2732:
2713:
2667:
2644:
2590:
1795:
939:
4495:
1941:
1639:
1617:
1605:
1046:
4275:
571:
both here and in my comment to you, Niteshift36. I am not sure what you are trying to achieve with quoting part of my message out of context. --
4257:
4145:
3796:
Hmm...I think that the account must have ended up in the list by mistake. Please unblock and move the case back to the previous name. Thanks —
1763:
1014:
397:
2979:
My apologies for picking on you again. Think of it as a tribute to your approachability and knowledge. :-) I wanted to leave this message for
1740:
1490:
Sorry! I'm not sure how I missed your question, but the account has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of User:Critic11 by myself and Jpgordon. —
908:, you are welcome to submit a sockpuppetry case, of course, but I can tell you that there is not enough evidence to make a convincing case. —
3990:
3687:
3588:
2399:
2323:
I will revert any future trolling on my talk page related to Ryulong. The bigger problem is, IMO, his reverting of changes to my talkpage. —
2218:
1925:
824:
Actually, I'm about 99.6% certain who it was, based on the fact that you blocked some sleeper accounts of theirs a few days ago. Shocking. --
757:
723:
673:
that shows violations, it's simply someone passionately defending a position when backed into a bit of a corner. Oh, it was also ages ago.
615:
576:
528:
4361:
3671:
3656:
2904:
2889:
2846:
2832:
2794:
2696:
2682:
2627:
2608:
2568:
2545:
2508:
2104:
3726:
3691:
3211:
2222:
1433:
directly, based primarily on the same evidence that made me believe the range block was working properly. Intervene or not as you see fit.—
3582:
4227:- see edit filter 58, he was using the sandbox to find a way around the filter. Please check for sleepers/IP if you're around. Thanks,
2430:
2415:
1621:
1210:
381:
4002:
3554:
I knew Harold Cook (British actor) and Dr. Who (2013 TV series) seemed familiar, but my memory failed me. I'll do better next time. :)
3324:
I heard the quacking, too, but I can only guess that this is either MEAT or someone else trying to get Ryulong in trouble. <sigh: -->
2815:, given his pattern of vandalism and a refusal to stop sockpuppeting. If I'm wrong and there was an invalid imput, could you please use
2599:
mobile" range, and Rschen7754 is correct, many innocent editors would be affected by a block - what we refer to as collateral damage. —
834:
4322:
4304:
4290:
3983:
3823:
3805:
3511:
3447:
3433:
3404:
3390:
2351:
2169:
What case was this related to? Because my dear friend is back and stirring up shit seeing as no one did a check on them the last time.—
2064:
1754:
1040:
4251:
4213:
4197:
4180:
3949:
3740:
1699:
1314:
1296:
1255:
1237:
3911:
3854:
Because the accounts are so painfully obvious, I usually don't, but I do monitor a couple of abuse filters designed to catch them. —
3219:
324:
291:
163:
4430:
4264:
4090:
What was most impressive was the company didn't fire the operator as it was common for people to do this. He was only reprimanded.--
3790:
3078:
Okay, thanks, I'll try to take care of it tomorrow. I'm kinda tired now and will soon go off-wiki and on to dinner and relaxation.--
2332:
1771:
1644:
1633:
1000:
961:
917:
865:
3763:
3193:
3179:
3161:
2444:
2394:
2318:
2294:
2280:
2256:
2238:
2198:
2154:
2140:
3106:
2613:
Then why don't we exempt the innocent users/IPs? That is something that admins are able to do. Also, we had to resort to at least
952:. It is against checkuser policy to run a check without proper evidence, so no CU will run a check to provide evidence for you. —
4507:
4489:
4471:
4127:
4113:
4099:
4067:
4045:
3877:
3863:
3563:
3334:
3319:
3293:
3087:
3073:
3055:
3046:
along with it, or do I have to check subpages when I move the report (someone ought to write a script for lame people like me)?--
3040:
3012:
2009:
1986:
1971:
1956:
1908:
1894:
1875:
1856:
1837:
1822:
1404:
1222:
1148:
1134:
1117:
1102:
484:
470:
442:
427:
409:
4072:
Thanks, DoRD. I tagged Irotentbre. I'm a little confused, though, on one point. Is there a relationship between Gbgfbgfbgfb and
3885:
1555:
1541:
2385:
That rings a bell, but I can't put my finger on it at the moment. At any rate, I blocked Cody and his friend as VOAs. Cheers —
2379:
1499:
1471:
1457:
983:
1485:
4381:
4204:(ec)...and there are at least two other related cases. It'll be a few hours, but I'll see about tying together what I can. —
3493:
2553:
1209:), as they have similar behavioral characteristics and the IP has been making personal attacks against the clerks working on
542:
I have send user Niteshift36 a message about his behaviour that was just so horrible that I just could not resist speaking up
234:
3955:
3230:
3215:
3203:
1183:
458:
4384:) to become visible only when a page exists. So thought to let you know that if you think it is useful you may add it. --
3371:
2655:
1610:
1077:
357:
3278:
1844:
4346:
4165:
4402:
4377:
4236:
3769:
3266:
3248:
317:
3543:
2944:
do; there would be much more collateral, and they would definitely have their steward bit removed if they did that. --
2182:
2041:
1676:
1228:
The range has been blocked, but dynamic IP addresses like this should not be tagged. Happy holidays to you as well. —
545:
4352:
Thank your for your interest in helping out, but unfortunately, I don't really have the time to take on a trainee. —
3595:
2365:
1737:
1721:
1592:
1526:
3708:
3522:
Thank for putting the comment about rangeblocks for the ACC process as it is good to avoid the backlog when we can!
1281:
839:
Given that I have blocked a number of his socks in the last couple of days, I'm guessing that it's Evlekis again. —
818:
4313:
in extraordinary circumstances, and even then, only if it is really needed. In the case above, it is not needed. —
4193:
3907:
3722:
3028:
2952:
2917:
2749:
2709:
2640:
2586:
2085:
1398:
1372:
1347:
1160:
189:
3748:
2741:. I think that all the attention that you are drawing to this is just making him want to cause more disruption. --
2124:
1847:. Anyway, I have gone ahead and blocked the /64 for a month, but certainly feel free to extend it as necessary. —
267:
2214:
1604:
When you have a moment, please take a look at the above talk page. I'm inclined to accept their unblock request.
147:
4185:
There's several open SPIs floating around that are actually him, with info from some CU actions on loginwiki. --
2718:
I mean the Wikimedia Stewards, or it could be the people who are in charge of Wikimedia. I think that we should
2532:
they have changed their IP address. We require evidence that they are actively socking or evading a block. Even
2244:
1683:
1287:
I don't have a link yet. The case is under discussion, and I will have more information in a few days. Cheers —
4030:
3146:
1711:
1056:
1034:
1006:
976:
932:
899:
227:
1327:
My page looks fixed this morning and thank you! Merry day after Christmas! B17 12:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
806:
433:
particular socks usually show up in edit filter 58 and/or 583 if you're interested in tracking them. Cheers —
4480:, but I did finally get around to running some checks in the case and have posted my results there. Cheers —
2036:
1206:
1024:
680:
511:
4373:
2574:
We risk blocking a lot of innocent people in the process. And the same would be true if we referred this to
1724:
1442:
351:
130:
In the past there has been some confusion around who controls which socks - there are several examples like
3549:
3166:
Well could you at least semi-protect X96lee15's user talk? He keeps restoring Wiki-star/Dragonron's edits.—
3152:
A couple of IPs have been blocked, but like I have said, I am not comfortable blocking the mobile range. —
2877:
1899:
I'm aware of that page, but I didn't see anything on it that said how to do it on the block form. Thanks!--
4017:. I blocked them, but it was rather confusing as to what they were doing, although none of it was good. I
4014:
2370:
Do you remember the 'Cody' sockpuppets? I'm wondering about the recent arrival of Cody the history man...
1428:
368:
337:
3517:
3459:
1597:
652:
201:
131:
2926:
Eh, not really. But if it works, why bother with it? Wait... Is this guy under a rangeblock right now??
1416:
375:
261:
4342:
3667:
3634:
3603:
2931:
2885:
2828:
2820:
2768:
2728:
2692:
2663:
2623:
2564:
2519:
2488:
2470:
2081:
1563:
1511:
344:
38:
4258:
3598:. I believe that his current actions would warrant at least a 1-3 year block on his current IP Range.
1882:
948:". If you wish to go forward with a sockpuppetry case, you must follow the instructions at the top of
278:
247:
3759:
3694:? The case is still marked as "CU requested", and I was confused. Thanks for any enlightenment. —
1246:
case on Evlekis? This sockpuppetry has been ongoing for many months now, with dozens of sockpuppets.
97:
285:
4367:
3979:
3961:
3559:
3344:
2162:
1422:
675:
452:
364:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
3302:
has indeffed the new user for block evasion (not unreasonable based on duck, but ...). Meanwhile,
1381:
4139:
3965:
3204:
2466:
2410:
1714:
out, to see whether it needs adjusting up or down, based on collateral damage potential? Thanks!
887:
120:
4494:
No problem, I know how busy you are. Fortunately, I was off-wiki and the wonderful and tireless
1189:
4219:
3260:
1410:
1251:
1218:
1007:
274:
254:
4281:
No, autoblocks will remain in place, but the exempt user will be able to edit through them. —
2483:
then he clearly trying to evade the admins on Knowledge and something should be done about it.
2027:
appreciate it. Thank you all for your time, and again I apologize for the trouble. be well. --
1624:? Frankly, the explanation that the other accounts belong to a friend rings hollow with me. —
4338:
4300:
4271:
3819:
3786:
3663:
3630:
3613:
FYI, if this guy keeps up his current pattern of naming his socks, his next socks should be:
3599:
3489:
3443:
3400:
3367:
2984:
2927:
2881:
2824:
2764:
2724:
2688:
2659:
2619:
2560:
2515:
2484:
2077:
2033:
1806:
1734:
1718:
1652:
923:
Isn't quite the suspicion? Could they please run a checkuser so I can use it as evidence? --
800:
776:
740:
698:
635:
601:
568:
556:
520:
331:
4380:
of Atama, that I thought it might be useful. After your concern, I have tried modifying it (
2778:
1667:. Is that good enough grounds to run a CU to see if there's more spam from the same source?
4266:
So when an IP block-exempt user edits from an IP address, are any autoblocks on it lifted?
4232:
4190:
4161:
3903:
3895:
3755:
3719:
3681:
3022:
3003:
I'm heading out for the evening, but I'll take a look at the case, etc., in the morning. —
2949:
2914:
2746:
2706:
2637:
2583:
2110:
2021:
1672:
1392:
1368:
1360:
1343:
1335:
1308:
1275:
183:
2719:
8:
4008:
3700:
3555:
2980:
2208:
1598:
1263:
883:
241:
143:
4295:
If IP block exemption doesn't extend to other users there's no reason not to grant it.
3130:
2405:
2328:
1682:
Yes, I frequently find spambot farms in that filter, so after taking a look, I blocked
1322:
1065:
1050:
972:
928:
895:
832:
816:
215:
3468:
4332:
3975:
3937:
3358:
3173:
3140:
3120:
2440:
2375:
2345:
2274:
2232:
2176:
2150:
2120:
1200:
1018:
991:
pointed out - you cannot use a Quick CheckUser request for suspected sockpuppetry. —
105:
4036:
Sorry for the delay, but I'm stuck using an iPad for at least a few more hours... —
2300:
you, and another facet of DENY is a refusal to react to trolling. I also suggest to
4296:
4267:
4153:
4055:
3931:
3815:
3782:
3527:
3485:
3439:
3409:
3396:
3378:
3363:
3210:
I see you CU-blocked him, so I thought I should let you know he is mentioned in an
2163:
2047:
2029:
1731:
1715:
873:
772:
736:
694:
666:
631:
552:
504:
4503:
4448:
4228:
4187:
4157:
4123:
4095:
4073:
4026:
4018:
3899:
3873:
3844:
3716:
3644:
3315:
3274:
3102:
3083:
3051:
3018:
2993:
2946:
2911:
2743:
2703:
2634:
2580:
2005:
1967:
1937:
1904:
1871:
1833:
1791:
1668:
1387:
1364:
1339:
1303:
1270:
1247:
1214:
1144:
1113:
1093:
to be one in the same. If you want to open a case, I'll comment there as well. —
1073:
658:
499:
Is a user being a jerk and kicking up a huge fuss about things against any rules?
466:
423:
197:
179:
3424:, but it is also possible that the IP they're using is a business connection. —
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4485:
4467:
4426:
4357:
4318:
4310:
4286:
4247:
4209:
4176:
4149:
4109:
4063:
4041:
3998:
3945:
3925:
3859:
3801:
3736:
3695:
3652:
3578:
3539:
3507:
3429:
3386:
3330:
3289:
3238:
3189:
3157:
3126:
3069:
3036:
3008:
2909:
You realize that all stewards can do about the matter is rangeblocks, right? --
2900:
2842:
2790:
2738:
2678:
2604:
2541:
2504:
2426:
2390:
2314:
2290:
2252:
2204:
2194:
2136:
2100:
2060:
1982:
1952:
1890:
1852:
1818:
1750:
1695:
1629:
1588:
1551:
1537:
1522:
1495:
1453:
1292:
1233:
1130:
1122:
1098:
996:
957:
913:
861:
844:
670:
590:
480:
438:
405:
159:
139:
47:
17:
3184:
If X96lee15 requests that their talk page be protected, I will consider it. —
4385:
3626:
3307:
2536:
evidence, blocks are ineffective if the user can change addresses at will. —
2324:
2301:
2264:
1481:
1467:
1438:
1243:
968:
949:
924:
905:
891:
825:
809:
662:
551:
after the fact to express your opinion is not going to be productive either.
169:
3647:, and how do you know that blocks haven't been put in place already? Best —
2816:
2000:). If you change your mind, let me know. Thanks, as always, for your help.--
192:) is a sock also, but I can't tell from your block who is the banned user.--
3310:, even though the first time I told him to leave it for an administrator.--
3303:
3299:
3167:
3134:
2436:
2371:
2339:
2306:
2268:
2226:
2170:
2146:
2116:
2070:
1196:
1162:
879:
752:
then I'll adjust my expectations of Knowledge as needed and I'll move on. -
475:
I don't see anything in their behavior to indicate that they're related. —
2781:
calculator has apparently been given invalid input, as that is the entire
2575:
986:
they used is mostly generated by the Wikimedia software when one uses the
3920:
3523:
3349:
Hi DoRD, could you help me with a couple unblock requests? It relates to
175:
4499:
4477:
4444:
4119:
4091:
4051:
4022:
3869:
3840:
3810:
Ok, I've unblocked and changed all the tags etc. The SPI's new home is
3770:
3311:
3270:
3098:
3079:
3047:
2989:
2001:
1963:
1933:
1900:
1867:
1829:
1802:
1787:
1705:
1140:
1109:
1069:
462:
419:
193:
4104:
Wow! $ 49 for a new keyboard sounds cheap in comparison. And...YGM. —
1195:
can be tagged and blocked as a possible sock of blocked sockpuppeteer
4481:
4463:
4422:
4353:
4314:
4282:
4243:
4205:
4172:
4105:
4059:
4037:
3994:
3941:
3928:. To appeal your block, log in with your primary account and use the
3855:
3797:
3732:
3648:
3574:
3535:
3503:
3425:
3382:
3326:
3285:
3234:
3185:
3153:
3065:
3032:
3004:
2896:
2838:
2786:
2674:
2600:
2537:
2500:
2422:
2386:
2310:
2286:
2248:
2190:
2132:
2096:
2092:
2091:
No. You may email them directly through the mailing list as detailed
2056:
1978:
1948:
1886:
1848:
1814:
1746:
1745:
Yep, I see. Sorry I missed you, but I've got to sleep some time ;) —
1691:
1625:
1620:. Have you seen the remarkably similar unblock requests from some of
1583:
1547:
1533:
1518:
1491:
1449:
1288:
1229:
1126:
1094:
992:
987:
953:
909:
857:
840:
586:
476:
434:
401:
155:
4077:
3306:, who can be headstrong, has twice removed Beautyfrisco's report at
2285:
Alright, I'll take a look after I deal with the Dragonron stuff. —
1477:
1463:
1434:
4498:
took care of all the clerking associated with the new sock farm.--
3960:
I wonder if you would be willing to look at an unblock request at
942:, that section of the page can only be used for a "situation that
2243:
I see. I'll comment at the IHeartUM case in a bit, but I've just
3412:, except for Hhighimpact059, the accounts listed in the SPI are
1575:
Notifying you due to your prior investigation of related case.
3534:
You're welcome, and I'll continue to do that where possible. —
1977:
redirect for the main page, but not for the archive, though. —
1861:
Thanks. I've saved the most stupid question for last, which is
1638:
Nope, hadn't seen those. I'll defer to your judgement. Cheers,
805:
Someone pretending to be you made a few vandalistic edits (see
1810:
1688:(It appears that I selected the wrong block reason for one...)
1663:
seems to be a spambot and was about to AIV him when I noticed
2701:
I'm not sure what you mean by Wikimedia Foundation admins. --
3964:. It relates to a range block you placed, which you can see
2309:
skills may not be the best, but this is the way I see it. —
4021:
one page they created and rolled back some edits. Thanks.--
2782:
414:
Is there a reason why you don't tag them? Any objection to
300:
3351:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Hhighimpact059/Archive
2480:
No worries about the IP Address, I'll just change it again
2475:
No worries about the IP Address, I'll just change it again
3839:
Were you going to check for additional socks/sleepers? --
2819:
to calculate his IP Range, given the data of his IPs in
1774:, but I don't see how I'm supposed to see activity from
1659:
967:Ιn any case, τhe edits are enough to form a suspicion.--
3573:, are what I use for confirmation these days. Cheers —
1570:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali Mohammad Khilji
210:
4242:
Charming. I'll add that to my list of things to do. —
1809:. Also, the IPv6 range calculator I typically use is
1772:
2605:E000:: - 2605:E000:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF
4438:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Katrina Villegas
3834:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/HENRY_APPLEGATE
3993:for the background on the webhost block. Cheers —
3812:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Master Beherit
3594:creating new socks every single day. He made more
2974:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Yoke Llully
1710:Hey, DoRD, when you get a chance, could you check
2499:I'll be glad to look at the case again. Cheers —
2463:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/24.188.32.225
2457:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/24.188.32.225
4417:space before the dividing bullet point if there
938:As I told you on your talk page, and as it says
117:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Cognoscerapo
4152:, as are the ones you just blocked as socks of
3092:It's done. I could swear I've done this before
2528:We can't just block the latest IP because they
1730:Nevermind, someone else got it. Thanks anyway!
4146:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Trieddyson
4144:Hey, could you check the accounts I posted at
2219:and made a case that was closed with no action
1764:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Monterrosa
1690:Anyway, thanks for keeping an eye on these. —
3991:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Jakandsig
3381:, I'll take a look at them in the morning. —
2632:We can't for IPs, especially dynamic ones. --
1926:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Doctorlaw
4462:, there might be another sockmaster here. —
2203:I had recently identified the sockmaster as
2050:, I apologize for the delayed response, but
3484:by a large margin for two months in a row!
847:) 13:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC) ...annnd
3779:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Kimse
540:You own words show your error. You said "
3214:, in case you didn't already know that.
1125:. I went ahead and blocked all three. —
1211:Evlekis's sockpuppet investigation page
14:
4259:Knowledge:SPI#Quick CheckUser requests
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3589:February 2014 IPhonehurricane95 socks
2595:I think I wrote that it was a "very
1993:
1779:
519:An example of his lovely demeanour:
25:
3596:threats of abusing other users here
3395:Thank you, I really appreciate it.
3133:. Can you block his range already?—
2895:Blocks have already been placed. —
2435:Finke is what I couldn't remember.
754:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91
720:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91
612:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91
573:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91
525:2001:980:A4CB:1:C4D6:2A5D:5305:7D91
23:
3438:Ok, thanks for looking into this.
771:the whip away, the horse is dead.
24:
4521:
3971:The editor who uses the pseudonym
3475:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
3233:, I have commented at the SPI. —
2649:So... You're saying that there's
982:You do realize, I hope, that the
3714:I've gone ahead and fixed it. --
3690:mean that you performed a CU on
3467:
3414:
1994:
1780:
1085:
848:
388:
29:
3777:Hi DoRD, the oldest account in
3269:) a sock of SweetPotatoSalad?--
3231:Someone not using his real name
3216:Someone not using his real name
3125:I found the original master is
1168:Hello DoRD, I was wondering if
461:) is not a Jude Enemy puppet?--
123:was likely to be Sinbad Barron.
4413:a case, and my version leaves
2223:there is a misplaced open case
945:does not involve sock puppetry
13:
1:
4472:14:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
4453:00:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
4252:15:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
4237:15:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
4214:16:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4198:16:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4181:16:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4166:16:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4128:02:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4114:01:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4100:00:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
4068:13:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
4046:15:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
4031:02:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
4003:21:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
3984:21:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
3950:19:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
3912:18:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
3878:19:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
3864:19:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
3849:18:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
3824:03:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
3806:02:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
3791:01:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
3764:04:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
3741:13:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
3727:06:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
3709:06:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
2554:IPhonehurricane95 Sockpuppets
2469:has quite openly said on the
2465:what you are missing is that
2225:with a new sockpuppet found.—
1500:22:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1486:21:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1472:23:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
1458:17:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
1443:01:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
1315:19:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
1297:19:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
1282:18:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
1256:15:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
1238:22:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1223:18:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1149:21:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
1135:21:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
1118:21:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
1103:17:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
1078:16:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
1001:16:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
977:15:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
962:14:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
933:14:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
918:01:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
900:00:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
866:13:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
835:04:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
819:04:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
781:14:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
762:04:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
745:02:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
728:20:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
703:19:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
687:19:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
669:going on, but unless I see a
640:19:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
620:19:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
595:18:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
581:19:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
561:18:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
533:18:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
516:, so I'm asking you here. :)
485:14:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
471:22:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
443:16:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
428:15:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
410:04:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
202:02:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
3956:Webhostblock unblock request
3919:I don't know anything about
3886:I'm not a sock puppet either
3672:08:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
3657:11:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
3639:07:47, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
3608:07:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
3583:02:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
3564:01:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
3544:17:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
3512:22:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3494:22:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3448:19:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3434:14:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3405:03:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3391:03:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3372:03:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3335:20:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
3320:20:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
3294:20:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
3279:20:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
3243:20:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
3224:18:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
3194:01:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
3180:22:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
3162:21:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
3147:18:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
3107:22:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
3088:02:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
3074:02:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
3056:01:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
3041:14:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
3013:00:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
2998:00:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
2957:09:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
2936:09:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
2922:09:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
2905:09:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
2890:09:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
2847:01:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
2833:00:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
2813:I highly recommend 3-5 years
2795:14:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
2773:04:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
2754:06:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
2737:One thing that does work is
2733:05:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2714:04:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2697:04:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2683:03:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2668:02:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2645:02:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2628:02:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2609:12:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2591:07:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2569:07:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2546:16:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2524:15:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2509:15:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2493:15:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2445:10:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2431:01:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2416:23:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2395:22:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2380:21:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2352:21:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2333:17:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2319:17:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2295:15:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2281:15:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2257:15:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2239:15:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2199:15:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2183:15:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2155:20:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2141:19:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2125:19:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2105:18:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2086:18:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2065:13:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2042:18:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
2010:17:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1987:17:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1972:14:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1957:04:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1942:00:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1909:17:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1895:17:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1876:17:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1857:16:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1838:16:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1823:16:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1796:15:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
1755:14:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
1741:09:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
1725:07:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
1700:17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1677:16:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
567:I did cite your comments on
164:21:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
148:20:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
7:
1645:03:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1634:13:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
1611:05:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
1593:17:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1556:08:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1542:00:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1527:00:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
10:
4526:
4309:I disagree. We only grant
3129:. I also have a thread at
2471:Talk:Chattan Confederation
2247:three related accounts. —
1578:Thank you for your time,
447:Thanks. I'm assuming that
4508:00:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
4490:12:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
4431:00:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
4403:23:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
4362:22:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
4347:20:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
4323:16:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
4305:16:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
4291:16:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
4276:16:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
3466:
2761:his IP Range is 0.0.0.0/0
2366:Just a thought before bed
1883:mw:Help:Range blocks/IPv6
3962:User talk:John Mayor ERS
3205:User:TranquilityResides
2467:User talk:69.119.124.12
888:User talk:Tco03displays
512:Personal attack removed
121:User:Cannot be detected
4372:Hello DoRD. Regarding
3705:(no relation to Jimbo)
3645:I do know how to count
2720:request a Global Block
1008:Kim Hyun-jung (singer)
4476:Sorry for the delay,
4225:User:Mutatedstructure
3936:template as outlined
3766:12 Feb 2014 Krystian
3749:I'm not a sock puppet
3482:Most active checkuser
3250:User:SweetPotatoSalad
3229:Thanks for the note,
2985:User:Soapamalkanmaime
1807:User:Jasper Deng/IPv6
602:Talk:Fox_News_Channel
569:Talk:Fox_News_Channel
521:Talk:Fox_News_Channel
42:of past discussions.
3989:Hi, JBW, please see
3550:The Deadly TV series
178:, I'm assuming that
4382:the sandbox version
3518:On Range blocks ACC
3460:A barnstar for you!
1845:less daunting guide
1599:User talk:Limbojazz
1301:Okay, I will wait.
984:"same edit summary"
884:User talk:LordFixit
3926:Audit subcommittee
2783:IPv4 address space
2307:dispute resolution
1564:Sock investigation
1512:Hatting at the RfA
1242:Should there be a
1213:. Happy holidays,
878:I do not have any
665:. Maybe a little
3973:
3915:
3898:comment added by
3707:
3499:
3498:
3422:indistinguishable
3359:User:PrestonDorey
1377:
1363:comment added by
1352:
1338:comment added by
1161:Possible sock of
653:talk page stalker
515:
503:I have send user
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4517:
4400:
4395:
4390:
4368:Template:Unblock
4339:Hell In A Bucket
4154:User:Cantseeshit
4080:on my talk page?
4056:User:Gbgfbgfbgfb
3969:
3935:
3914:
3892:
3703:
3692:the Levineps SPI
3664:LightandDark2000
3631:LightandDark2000
3600:LightandDark2000
3502:Thanks, Mark! —
3471:
3464:
3463:
3418:
3417:
3345:Unblock requests
3176:
3170:
3143:
3137:
3131:WP:ANI#Wiki-star
2928:LightandDark2000
2882:LightandDark2000
2825:LightandDark2000
2765:LightandDark2000
2725:LightandDark2000
2689:LightandDark2000
2660:LightandDark2000
2620:LightandDark2000
2561:LightandDark2000
2516:QuintusPetillius
2485:QuintusPetillius
2413:
2408:
2348:
2342:
2277:
2271:
2235:
2229:
2179:
2173:
2164:User:CHECKEDUSER
2078:Phonehurricane95
2040:
2039:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1689:
1662:
1642:
1608:
1432:
1405:deleted contribs
1376:
1357:
1351:
1332:
1313:
1306:
1280:
1273:
1194:
1193:
1174:
1089:
1088:
852:
851:
830:
814:
685:
683:
678:
656:
509:
392:
391:
386:
384:
347:
327:
325:deleted contribs
303:
296:
294:
257:
237:
235:deleted contribs
213:
207:Those accounts,
132:Neutral Fair Guy
119:, you said that
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4525:
4524:
4520:
4519:
4518:
4516:
4515:
4514:
4441:
4396:
4391:
4386:
4370:
4335:
4262:
4222:
4142:
4140:Ginsuloft socks
4078:this discussion
4074:User:Jude Enemy
4011:
3958:
3929:
3893:
3888:
3837:
3775:
3773:unblock request
3756:KrystianSzastok
3751:
3684:
3643:Thank you, but
3591:
3552:
3520:
3462:
3415:
3355:User:DIZwikwiki
3347:
3253:
3208:
3174:
3168:
3141:
3135:
3123:
2977:
2556:
2459:
2411:
2406:
2368:
2346:
2340:
2275:
2269:
2233:
2227:
2177:
2171:
2167:
2113:
2073:
2032:
2028:
2024:
1995:
1929:
1781:
1767:
1708:
1687:
1658:
1655:
1640:
1606:
1602:
1566:
1514:
1390:
1384:
1358:
1333:
1325:
1304:
1302:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1086:
1011:
876:
856:, of course. —
849:
826:
810:
803:
681:
676:
674:
650:
501:
418:tagging them?--
389:
360:
340:
320:
299:
298:
270:
250:
230:
209:
208:
172:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4523:
4513:
4512:
4511:
4510:
4474:
4440:
4435:
4434:
4433:
4369:
4366:
4365:
4364:
4334:
4331:
4330:
4329:
4328:
4327:
4326:
4325:
4261:
4256:
4255:
4254:
4221:
4220:More Ginsuloft
4218:
4217:
4216:
4202:
4201:
4200:
4150:User:Ginsuloft
4141:
4138:
4137:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4132:
4131:
4130:
4084:
4083:
4082:
4081:
4048:
4010:
4007:
4006:
4005:
3957:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3887:
3884:
3883:
3882:
3881:
3880:
3836:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3826:
3774:
3768:
3750:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3683:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3674:
3590:
3587:
3586:
3585:
3556:Anna Frodesiak
3551:
3548:
3547:
3546:
3519:
3516:
3515:
3514:
3497:
3496:
3478:
3477:
3472:
3461:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3346:
3343:
3342:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3252:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3207:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3199:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3127:User:Wiki-star
3122:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3015:
2981:Reaper Eternal
2976:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2907:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2858:
2857:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2654:him, as noted
2593:
2555:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2511:
2461:In regards to
2458:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2403:
2367:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2297:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2166:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2112:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2072:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2023:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
1928:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1881:instructions:
1766:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1684:three accounts
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1622:these accounts
1601:
1596:
1565:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1513:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1383:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1324:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1265:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1172:188.29.107.118
1165:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1139:Heh, thanks.--
1061:
1060:
1044:
1028:
1010:
1005:
1004:
1003:
965:
964:
921:
920:
875:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
802:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
748:
747:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
607:
606:
605:
604:
583:
565:
564:
563:
500:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
449:Swagalicious22
174:Hey, based on
171:
168:
167:
166:
136:
135:
128:
124:
111:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
18:User talk:DoRD
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4522:
4509:
4505:
4501:
4497:
4493:
4492:
4491:
4487:
4483:
4479:
4475:
4473:
4469:
4465:
4461:
4457:
4456:
4455:
4454:
4450:
4446:
4439:
4432:
4428:
4424:
4420:
4416:
4412:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4401:
4399:
4394:
4389:
4383:
4379:
4375:
4363:
4359:
4355:
4351:
4350:
4349:
4348:
4344:
4340:
4324:
4320:
4316:
4312:
4308:
4307:
4306:
4302:
4298:
4294:
4293:
4292:
4288:
4284:
4280:
4279:
4278:
4277:
4273:
4269:
4265:
4260:
4253:
4249:
4245:
4241:
4240:
4239:
4238:
4234:
4230:
4226:
4215:
4211:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4196:
4195:
4192:
4189:
4184:
4183:
4182:
4178:
4174:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4155:
4151:
4148:? These are
4147:
4129:
4125:
4121:
4117:
4116:
4115:
4111:
4107:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4097:
4093:
4088:
4087:
4086:
4085:
4079:
4075:
4071:
4070:
4069:
4065:
4061:
4057:
4053:
4049:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4035:
4034:
4033:
4032:
4028:
4024:
4020:
4016:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3992:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3981:
3977:
3972:
3967:
3963:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3933:
3927:
3922:
3918:
3917:
3916:
3913:
3909:
3905:
3901:
3897:
3879:
3875:
3871:
3867:
3866:
3865:
3861:
3857:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3846:
3842:
3835:
3825:
3821:
3817:
3813:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3772:
3767:
3765:
3761:
3757:
3742:
3738:
3734:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3725:
3724:
3721:
3718:
3713:
3712:
3711:
3710:
3706:
3702:
3699:
3698:
3693:
3689:
3673:
3669:
3665:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3654:
3650:
3646:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3636:
3632:
3628:
3627:User:Earth100
3624:
3620:
3616:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3605:
3601:
3597:
3584:
3580:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3561:
3557:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3532:
3531:
3529:
3525:
3513:
3509:
3505:
3501:
3500:
3495:
3491:
3487:
3483:
3480:
3479:
3476:
3473:
3470:
3465:
3449:
3445:
3441:
3437:
3436:
3435:
3431:
3427:
3423:
3420:
3411:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3380:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3360:
3356:
3352:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3301:
3298:Interesting.
3297:
3296:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3283:
3282:
3281:
3280:
3276:
3272:
3268:
3265:
3262:
3258:
3251:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3213:
3206:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3177:
3171:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3151:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3144:
3138:
3132:
3128:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3097:consistent.--
3095:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3071:
3067:
3063:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3044:
3043:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3027:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2986:
2982:
2975:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2955:
2954:
2951:
2948:
2943:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2933:
2929:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2919:
2916:
2913:
2908:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2752:
2751:
2748:
2745:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2730:
2726:
2721:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2712:
2711:
2708:
2705:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2652:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2643:
2642:
2639:
2636:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2616:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2592:
2589:
2588:
2585:
2582:
2577:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2512:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2481:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2414:
2409:
2407:Berean Hunter
2401:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2353:
2349:
2343:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2303:
2298:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2278:
2272:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2236:
2230:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2180:
2174:
2165:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2053:
2049:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2038:
2035:
2031:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1927:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1864:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1777:
1773:
1765:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1739:
1736:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1685:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1661:
1653:Spambot farm?
1646:
1643:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1609:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1585:
1579:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1430:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1394:
1389:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1328:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1179:
1173:
1164:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
985:
981:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
930:
926:
919:
915:
911:
907:
904:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
867:
863:
859:
855:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
833:
831:
829:
823:
822:
821:
820:
817:
815:
813:
807:
801:Rude impostor
782:
778:
774:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
759:
755:
750:
749:
746:
742:
738:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
704:
700:
696:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
684:
679:
672:
668:
664:
660:
654:
649:
648:
641:
637:
633:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
603:
598:
597:
596:
592:
588:
584:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
517:
513:
506:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
454:
450:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
383:
380:
377:
374:
370:
366:
363:
359:
356:
353:
350:
346:
343:
339:
336:
333:
330:
326:
323:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
302:
293:
290:
287:
284:
280:
276:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
249:
246:
243:
240:
236:
233:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
212:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
165:
161:
157:
152:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
133:
129:
125:
122:
118:
114:
113:
112:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4442:
4418:
4414:
4410:
4397:
4392:
4387:
4378:this comment
4371:
4336:
4263:
4223:
4186:
4143:
4012:
3976:JamesBWatson
3970:
3959:
3894:— Preceding
3889:
3838:
3776:
3752:
3715:
3704:
3696:
3688:this comment
3685:
3682:Levineps SPI
3622:
3618:
3614:
3592:
3553:
3521:
3474:
3421:
3419:Technically
3413:
3348:
3304:User:Ryulong
3263:
3257:Beautyfrisco
3254:
3209:
3124:
3093:
3061:
3025:
2978:
2945:
2941:
2910:
2875:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2760:
2742:
2702:
2650:
2633:
2614:
2596:
2579:
2557:
2533:
2529:
2479:
2478:
2474:
2460:
2369:
2211:
2168:
2114:
2111:Just a query
2074:
2051:
2025:
2022:My Apologies
1932:precisely.--
1930:
1862:
1786:). Thanks.--
1775:
1768:
1709:
1656:
1603:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1574:
1567:
1515:
1425:
1419:
1413:
1407:
1401:
1395:
1386:I reblocked
1385:
1359:— Preceding
1334:— Preceding
1329:
1326:
1309:
1276:
1267:
1203:
1186:
1180:
1167:
1090:
1062:
1053:
1037:
1021:
966:
944:
943:
922:
877:
853:
827:
811:
804:
608:
548:
541:
518:
502:
455:
415:
393:
378:
372:
361:
354:
348:
341:
334:
328:
321:
314:
308:
301:Qasdssaassds
288:
282:
271:
264:
258:
251:
244:
238:
231:
224:
218:
186:
173:
137:
109:
78:
43:
37:
4297:Peter James
4268:Peter James
4156:. Thanks,
4009:Please look
3921:Open Europe
3816:Mark Arsten
3783:Mark Arsten
3486:Mark Arsten
3440:Mark Arsten
3397:Mark Arsten
3364:Mark Arsten
3212:ongoing SPI
2878:this threat
2801:192.0.0.0/3
2779:range block
2030:Sue Rangell
1732:Writ Keeper
1716:Writ Keeper
1568:Please see
1264:Surprise...
1066:WP:INVOLVED
773:Niteshift36
737:Niteshift36
695:Niteshift36
632:Niteshift36
610:this up. --
553:Niteshift36
505:Niteshift36
400:. Cheers —
376:investigate
286:investigate
36:This is an
4229:NawlinWiki
4158:NawlinWiki
3900:Ayresmith1
3832:Regarding
3771:User:Kimse
3686:Hi. Does
3060:If it was
3019:Keepsgames
2809:64.0.0.0/2
2805:42.0.0.0/9
2576:m:Stewards
2514:vandalism.
2473:page that
1776:that range
1669:Jackmcbarn
1657:I noticed
1546:Thanks. --
1423:block user
1417:filter log
1388:Bseventeen
1382:Bseventeen
1365:Bseventeen
1340:Bseventeen
1323:Thank you!
1305:The Banner
1272:The Banner
1248:Epicgenius
1215:Epicgenius
398:Jude Enemy
345:block user
338:filter log
255:block user
248:filter log
180:Qasaasassa
138:Have fun;
98:Archive 10
4333:SPI Clerk
4118:Thanks.--
4050:Finally.
3121:Dragonron
2817:this link
2205:Dragonron
1660:Mr51ronju
1429:block log
1091:Confirmed
988:move page
854:Confirmed
667:WP:BATTLE
396:socks of
394:Confirmed
365:CheckUser
352:block log
275:CheckUser
262:block log
140:bobrayner
106:Odd socks
90:Archive 8
85:Archive 7
79:Archive 6
73:Archive 5
68:Archive 4
60:Archive 1
4496:Callanec
4054:, it is
3908:contribs
3896:unsigned
3868:Okay. --
3623:Earth110
3619:Earth109
3615:Earth108
3267:contribs
3029:contribs
2325:X96lee15
2302:X96lee15
2221:and now
2215:contribs
1811:this one
1641:Tiptoety
1618:Tiptoety
1607:Tiptoety
1399:contribs
1373:contribs
1361:unsigned
1348:contribs
1336:unsigned
1207:contribs
1184:contribs
1057:contribs
1047:Wild1004
1041:contribs
1025:contribs
969:Katcheic
925:Katcheic
906:Katcheic
892:Katcheic
880:edit war
874:checking
828:Jprg1966
812:Jprg1966
659:WP:CIVIL
549:3 months
459:contribs
318:contribs
228:contribs
211:Adaasads
190:contribs
115:Over at
110:Hi DoRD,
4019:deleted
3932:Unblock
3300:Legoktm
3169:Ryūlóng
3136:Ryūlóng
3094:without
2739:WP:DENY
2651:nothing
2437:Peridon
2372:Peridon
2341:Ryūlóng
2270:Ryūlóng
2245:blocked
2228:Ryūlóng
2172:Ryūlóng
2147:Peridon
2117:Peridon
1197:Evlekis
1163:Evlekis
1108:best.--
1015:Longkhj
671:WP:DIFF
39:archive
4409:there
3524:Jab843
3308:WP:AN3
2823:list?
2807:, and
2412:(talk)
2265:WP:TPO
1476:Ping?—
1244:WP:LTA
950:WP:SPI
682:&L
663:WP:NPA
382:cuwiki
292:cuwiki
4500:Bbb23
4478:Bbb23
4445:Bbb23
4411:isn't
4120:Bbb23
4092:Bbb23
4052:Bbb23
4023:Bbb23
3870:Jakob
3841:Jakob
3701:wales
3377:Hey,
3312:Bbb23
3271:Bbb23
3099:Bbb23
3080:Bbb23
3048:Bbb23
3031:). —
2990:Bbb23
2002:Bbb23
1964:Bbb23
1934:Bbb23
1901:Bbb23
1868:Bbb23
1866:do?--
1830:Bbb23
1803:Bbb23
1788:Bbb23
1190:WHOIS
1141:Bbb23
1110:Bbb23
1070:Bbb23
882:with
463:Bbb23
420:Bbb23
194:Bbb23
170:Socks
16:<
4504:talk
4486:talk
4482:DoRD
4468:talk
4464:DoRD
4449:talk
4427:talk
4423:DoRD
4374:this
4358:talk
4354:DoRD
4343:talk
4319:talk
4315:DoRD
4311:IPBE
4301:talk
4287:talk
4283:DoRD
4272:talk
4248:talk
4244:DoRD
4233:talk
4210:talk
4206:DoRD
4194:7754
4191:chen
4177:talk
4173:DoRD
4162:talk
4124:talk
4110:talk
4106:DoRD
4096:talk
4064:talk
4060:DoRD
4042:talk
4038:DoRD
4027:talk
4015:this
3999:talk
3995:DoRD
3980:talk
3966:here
3946:talk
3942:DoRD
3940:. —
3938:here
3904:talk
3874:talk
3860:talk
3856:DoRD
3845:talk
3820:talk
3802:talk
3798:DoRD
3787:talk
3760:talk
3737:talk
3733:DoRD
3723:7754
3720:chen
3697:Rich
3668:talk
3653:talk
3649:DoRD
3635:talk
3604:talk
3579:talk
3575:DoRD
3560:talk
3540:talk
3536:DoRD
3528:talk
3508:talk
3504:DoRD
3490:talk
3444:talk
3430:talk
3426:DoRD
3410:Mark
3401:talk
3387:talk
3383:DoRD
3379:Mark
3368:talk
3357:and
3331:talk
3327:DoRD
3316:talk
3290:talk
3286:DoRD
3275:talk
3261:talk
3239:talk
3235:DoRD
3220:talk
3190:talk
3186:DoRD
3158:talk
3154:DoRD
3103:talk
3084:talk
3070:talk
3066:DoRD
3052:talk
3037:talk
3033:DoRD
3023:talk
3009:talk
3005:DoRD
2994:talk
2953:7754
2950:chen
2932:talk
2918:7754
2915:chen
2901:talk
2897:DoRD
2886:talk
2876:See
2843:talk
2839:DoRD
2829:talk
2821:this
2791:talk
2787:DoRD
2785:. —
2777:The
2769:talk
2750:7754
2747:chen
2729:talk
2710:7754
2707:chen
2693:talk
2679:talk
2675:DoRD
2664:talk
2656:here
2641:7754
2638:chen
2624:talk
2605:talk
2601:DoRD
2597:busy
2587:7754
2584:chen
2578:. --
2565:talk
2542:talk
2538:DoRD
2534:with
2520:talk
2505:talk
2501:DoRD
2489:talk
2441:talk
2427:talk
2423:DoRD
2400:This
2391:talk
2387:DoRD
2376:talk
2338:it.—
2329:talk
2315:talk
2311:DoRD
2291:talk
2287:DoRD
2253:talk
2249:DoRD
2209:talk
2195:talk
2191:DoRD
2151:talk
2137:talk
2133:DoRD
2121:talk
2101:talk
2097:DoRD
2095:. —
2093:here
2082:talk
2071:BASC
2061:talk
2057:DoRD
2052:your
2006:talk
1983:talk
1979:DoRD
1968:talk
1953:talk
1949:DoRD
1938:talk
1905:talk
1891:talk
1887:DoRD
1885:. —
1872:talk
1853:talk
1849:DoRD
1834:talk
1819:talk
1815:DoRD
1801:Hey
1792:talk
1751:talk
1747:DoRD
1712:this
1696:talk
1692:DoRD
1673:talk
1665:this
1630:talk
1626:DoRD
1616:Hi,
1589:talk
1584:Cirt
1552:talk
1548:Stfg
1538:talk
1534:DoRD
1523:talk
1519:Stfg
1496:talk
1492:DoRD
1482:talk
1468:talk
1454:talk
1450:DoRD
1439:talk
1411:logs
1393:talk
1369:talk
1344:talk
1310:talk
1293:talk
1289:DoRD
1277:talk
1252:talk
1234:talk
1230:DoRD
1219:talk
1201:talk
1178:talk
1145:talk
1131:talk
1127:DoRD
1114:talk
1099:talk
1095:DoRD
1074:talk
1064:I'm
1051:talk
1035:talk
1031:나는우리
1019:talk
997:talk
993:DoRD
973:talk
958:talk
954:DoRD
940:here
929:talk
914:talk
910:DoRD
896:talk
886:but
862:talk
858:DoRD
845:talk
841:DoRD
777:talk
758:talk
741:talk
724:talk
699:talk
636:talk
616:talk
591:talk
587:DoRD
577:talk
557:talk
529:talk
481:talk
477:DoRD
467:talk
453:talk
439:talk
435:DoRD
424:talk
406:talk
402:DoRD
387:are
332:logs
306:talk
297:and
242:logs
216:talk
198:talk
184:talk
176:this
160:talk
156:DoRD
144:talk
4488:)
4470:)
4460:FYI
4429:)
4360:)
4321:)
4289:)
4250:)
4212:)
4179:)
4112:)
4066:)
4044:)
4013:at
4001:)
3978:" (
3948:)
3862:)
3804:)
3739:)
3655:)
3581:)
3571:#58
3542:)
3510:)
3432:)
3389:)
3333:)
3292:)
3255:Is
3241:)
3192:)
3160:)
3072:)
3039:)
3011:)
2942:not
2903:)
2845:)
2793:)
2681:)
2615:two
2607:)
2544:)
2530:say
2507:)
2429:)
2393:)
2317:)
2293:)
2255:)
2197:)
2139:)
2103:)
2063:)
2048:Sue
1985:)
1955:)
1893:)
1863:how
1855:)
1821:)
1753:)
1698:)
1632:)
1540:)
1498:)
1478:Kww
1464:Kww
1456:)
1435:Kww
1295:)
1236:)
1133:)
1123:Meh
1101:)
999:)
960:)
916:)
864:)
661:or
593:)
483:)
441:)
408:)
369:log
312:tag
279:log
222:tag
162:)
127:to.
4506:)
4451:)
4419:is
4415:no
4345:)
4303:)
4274:)
4235:)
4188:Rs
4164:)
4126:)
4098:)
4029:)
3982:)
3968:.
3934:}}
3930:{{
3910:)
3906:•
3876:)
3847:)
3822:)
3814:.
3789:)
3762:)
3717:Rs
3670:)
3637:)
3629:.
3621:,
3617:,
3606:)
3562:)
3530:)
3492:)
3446:)
3403:)
3370:)
3353:.
3325:—
3318:)
3277:)
3222:)
3178:)
3175:琉竜
3145:)
3142:琉竜
3105:)
3086:)
3062:me
3054:)
2996:)
2947:Rs
2934:)
2912:Rs
2888:)
2831:)
2811:.
2803:,
2771:)
2763:.
2744:Rs
2731:)
2704:Rs
2695:)
2673:—
2666:)
2658:.
2635:Rs
2626:)
2581:Rs
2567:)
2522:)
2491:)
2443:)
2421:—
2404:—
2378:)
2350:)
2347:琉竜
2331:)
2279:)
2276:琉竜
2267:.—
2237:)
2234:琉竜
2217:)
2189:—
2181:)
2178:琉竜
2153:)
2131:—
2123:)
2084:)
2034:✍
2008:)
1970:)
1940:)
1907:)
1874:)
1836:)
1794:)
1706:CU
1686:.
1675:)
1591:)
1581:—
1572:.
1554:)
1525:)
1484:)
1470:)
1441:)
1375:)
1371:•
1350:)
1346:•
1254:)
1221:)
1147:)
1116:)
1076:)
975:)
931:)
898:)
779:)
760:)
743:)
726:)
718:--
701:)
677:ES
638:)
618:)
579:)
559:)
531:)
523:--
469:)
426:)
416:my
371:)
358:CA
281:)
268:CA
200:)
146:)
94:→
64:←
4502:(
4484:(
4466:(
4447:(
4425:(
4398:S
4393:M
4388:S
4356:(
4341:(
4317:(
4299:(
4285:(
4270:(
4246:(
4231:(
4208:(
4175:(
4160:(
4122:(
4108:(
4094:(
4062:(
4040:(
4025:(
3997:(
3974:"
3944:(
3902:(
3872:(
3858:(
3843:(
3818:(
3800:(
3785:(
3758:(
3735:(
3666:(
3651:(
3633:(
3602:(
3577:(
3558:(
3538:(
3526:(
3506:(
3488:(
3442:(
3428:(
3399:(
3385:(
3366:(
3329:(
3314:(
3288:(
3273:(
3264:·
3259:(
3237:(
3218:(
3188:(
3172:(
3156:(
3139:(
3101:(
3082:(
3068:(
3050:(
3035:(
3026:·
3021:(
3007:(
2992:(
2930:(
2899:(
2884:(
2841:(
2827:(
2789:(
2767:(
2727:(
2691:(
2677:(
2662:(
2622:(
2603:(
2563:(
2540:(
2518:(
2503:(
2487:(
2439:(
2425:(
2402:?
2389:(
2374:(
2344:(
2327:(
2313:(
2289:(
2273:(
2251:(
2231:(
2212:·
2207:(
2193:(
2175:(
2149:(
2135:(
2119:(
2099:(
2080:(
2059:(
2037:✉
2004:(
1992:(
1981:(
1966:(
1951:(
1936:(
1903:(
1889:(
1870:(
1851:(
1832:(
1817:(
1790:(
1749:(
1738:♔
1735:⚇
1722:♔
1719:⚇
1694:(
1671:(
1628:(
1587:(
1550:(
1536:(
1521:(
1494:(
1480:(
1466:(
1452:(
1437:(
1431:)
1426:·
1420:·
1414:·
1408:·
1402:·
1396:·
1391:(
1367:(
1342:(
1291:(
1250:(
1232:(
1217:(
1204:·
1199:(
1192:)
1187:·
1181:·
1176:(
1143:(
1129:(
1112:(
1097:(
1072:(
1059:)
1054:·
1049:(
1043:)
1038:·
1033:(
1027:)
1022:·
1017:(
995:(
971:(
956:(
927:(
912:(
894:(
860:(
843:(
775:(
756:(
739:(
722:(
697:(
655:)
651:(
634:(
614:(
589:(
575:(
555:(
527:(
514:)
510:(
479:(
465:(
456:·
451:(
437:(
422:(
404:(
385:)
379:·
373:·
367:(
362:·
355:·
349:·
342:·
335:·
329:·
322:·
315:·
309:·
304:(
295:)
289:·
283:·
277:(
272:·
265:·
259:·
252:·
245:·
239:·
232:·
225:·
219:·
214:(
196:(
187:·
182:(
158:(
142:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.