User talk:Dennis Brown/Archive 12

7875:? Some of the IP addresses haven't edited this year, but the others did and more than once, as well as the named user accounts. Even if some accounts are stale, couldn't it be looked at on behavioral pattern alone? And could you also explain to me why you say there is no abuse between the socks? If the socks are reverting to each other's edits to promote the initial edit of one account, is that not abuse of accounts? Also, the fact that one made an initial edit on the Belly Dance article, where they added content that was not in the source they cited, and they also named the source something it really was not (the source was a fiction/fantasy novel and not a factual book as they claimed). And then to have two other accounts say the exact same thing later on, using the exact same source, is that not fraud and abuse of accounts? The reason I feel this is a serious matter is because the pattern is very alike to Plouton2's socks. This person could be starting up again with new accounts, wouldn't that be considered an evasion of block? If you look at the Plouton2 case, there's over 55 sock accounts blocked. The list I provide follows the same pattern (many accounts targeting same articles), same editing style, same interests. The interconnectivity you displayed does not include all the articles or the socks I listed. As shown in the diffs, some of the socks I listed reverted to socks of Plouton2 and not edits from Plouton2's account alone. What are the chances that any random user would say the exact same thing as another user in the exact same article and then to use the exact same source which is fiction? Could you please have another look at the case? I really would appreciate it. Thank you. 1685:

nominators. Do I think they represent the community as a whole? from 150 to 200 people vote in most successful RfAs, less for obviously failing ones, so that is a reasonable cross-section, but again, if you don't vote, that isn't the fault of the community. Adding a new layer of bureaucracy isn't going to make the process less bureaucratic or more fair, and opens up so many layers of abuse as to make the idea dead in the water as the community is not likely to give up what little control they have in the process. Knowledge is a project, not a government. Unlike citizens of a government, the citizens at Knowledge are directly involved with the goals, creating an encyclopedia. The only reason we allow a republican style leadership for government is that we don't want to have to deal with all the individual decisions, so we delegate (vote for) that responsibility to someone else. The citizens of Knowledge don't have that many things to deal with, just individual issues and the "election" of admin, Arbs, Checkusers and Oversighters. Those are already positions that take care of problems so that individual citizens don't have to. Again, feel free to support whatever initiative you choose. No matter how enthusiastic some may be on that Signpost article, I'm pretty sure that the few hundres people that vote semi-regularly at RfA are not likely to endorse it, so it would be dead on delivery. That makes the issue moot. My only point is that moving power away from the average user is always a bad idea, and empowering a few people at the top who have shown only that they are good politicians, well, that is always bad.

8348:

consensus for certain awards to be included that everyone agreed on. The remainder were not discussed because Tib42 failed to return in a reasonable period of time. New consensus should easily have been able to be formed for a number of the awards. The problem was that when Tib42 did come back his attempt at discussion was poor. He attempted to re-discuss the ones we already had consensus to include and tried to discuss including ‘’all’’ of the awards rather than choosing the most notable of the remaining ones he wanted to include. I was busy at the time and didn’t desire to dive in to discussing all of those points. Because I was busy, I attempted to “pass the buck” rather than telling him to start with one or two of the awards he felt were most notable; however, nobody else took part in the discussion. He can’t be blamed for reinserting the material when nobody would discuss it with him. I’m having some technical trouble, so I can’t see the revert. But there wasn’t specific consensus not to include a number of the awards that he wanted to reinstate. (On behalf of

182:

new clerks, and the existing CUs are so swamped, I'm thinking that is why they don't want to train new clerks themselves. You can always work it as a nonclerk, nonadmin observer. Adding diffs, offering opinions as to likelihood, etc. Not much different than ANI, except the stakes are much higher, so it takes more caution and a lot more research. That is likely a problem for you though, since each case takes a lot of research. About half the clerking requires the bit, which is part of the problem. The other is that it is a thankless and sometimes tedious job, which is why it is so hard to get admin to volunteer. It is, however, an excellent step toward adminship if you do it well, whether you clerk or just help out with cases. Be forewarned, there is a bit of a learning curve and you have to start slow, which might be why some people don't stick with it. It is also very rewarding work, so it is worth the high price.

917:

more about making sure the oldest account is listed as the Master, then moving everything if it isn't. Fixing bad formatting. Knowing when you need to do a history merge, and when you need to do a copy/paste. This is mainly when you have a case like "Bob" is the master, "Alice" is the puppet, then CU discovers they are both really socks of "Charlie", so you have to do a history merge (admin bit required). Or you discover that puppet master "Doug" and puppetmaster "Ernie" are really the same person, so you have combine cases. Or you have the same master "Alice" and the sock "Bob", but you find out that "Bob is really a sock of "Charlie", and not related to "Alice", but "Alice already has an archive, so you have to copy page (and attribute) everything to a new page for Charlie. Clerking is mainly paperwork. Much of the blocking and comparing can be done by patrolling admin, although

4368:, I decided to look into his contribution history because I figured that, with the nonexistent user page/talk page, he was likely new. And sure enough, the account is newly registered -- registered on the 14th of this month. But when I looked into his contribution history, I noticed a striking similarity between his article interests and edit summary style and that of Ewawer's. On the 14th, Rogr101 made the following edit summary expressions: ‎"(Ce)," "Expand intro," "Tidy up bit," and "More tidy up." These are all expressions that Ewawer uses often. While other editors use these expressions, it is usually sparingly with regard to the last three; I have come across none that use them as often as Ewawer, especially "Tidy up." And although Ewawer doesn't always capitalize his edit summaries, he sometimes does, such as 8467:

as each one of you have insisted. What I cannot understand is, when somebody else included the Hoover medal, nobody objected and there was no discussion at all. But when I am attempting to include that which is common knowledge and from secondary and tertiary sources, you guys are objecting to it. Surely this is not a positive way forward. What does Bbb23 find so objectionable in what I am saying? I have clearly stated my reasons and you can engage. Furthermore, Dennis I object to an insinuation that I do not belong to the category of 'generally not improving the encyclopedia'. I am trying to improve an article that is important to so many Indians. Others will do the same for other articles. Is that not the spirit in which all of this is supposed to work? --

8214:

mentor is on the case and I trust that there will be a proper resolution and forward progress. There is a lesson here. If Raiden/Deidra's editing and advice had not been so obviously off-base, where someone noticed right away that she had no business being an adopter, who knows how many new users she would have negatively affected. We are all so fragile and innocent when we first enter Knowledge's front door. We trust what the residents tell us. But, I'm not sure anything can be done except to be watchful. And, lastly, I certainly don't apologize or feel at all badly about raising a little drama which, according to

6061:

whether deliberately or accidentally, I can't be sure, but the second eliminates the possibility of too narrow an interpretation of the first. For example, an edit in an RFA stating that so and so is a terrible editor is arguably not an edit about the process. The second sentence covers that possibility. However, if someone asks a question on MF's talk page about a GAN, and MF responds that the main editor does seem to understand English, that should not, IMO, be a violation. If he follows it up by saying, not only doesn't the editor know English, but he shouldn't be an admin, then that crosses the line.--

1572:. Once you take away their right to choose admins, you have stripped away their most basic right in a community: the right to choose who gets the tools to block, protect and delete. Cronyism and other forms of abuse will always be present or suspected. It would quickly become more controversial and more hated than the current system. Removing RfA and replacing it with an elected committee who will hand select admin is a bad idea. It is bad for editor retention, the overall level of happiness and trust here, and it is completely counter to everything I have been working toward. 4477:

are in Ewawer's range of article interests and has used edit summary style that is signature of Ewawer's editing. I certainly don't want Ewawer blocked. I was conflicted about what to do on this matter, but didn't even seriously consider starting a sockpuppet investigation because of what I stated above. Although Ewawer's formatting is often "off," Knowledge-formatting wise, and he often adds unsourced material, his editing is generally beneficial to Knowledge. I was waiting until Rogr101 responds to decide whether or not to add a Welcome template to Rogr101's talk page.

8262:

understand that as well. We are all human, we all make mistakes. I think both of you meant well, so I'm not inclined to get mad at anyone. I suggest that you work with your mentor, Keilana (who I happen to think the world of, by the way) and in a year, you will be ready to mentor others. I will go flog Buster with a wet noodle. Well, maybe not. But I think you both understand what I'm talking about. We all just need to breath deep and remember that even the best of us make mistakes, including me (all the time, actually). We all good folks, just remember that.

3282:

shortcomings. The solution I suggested on that one Arb's page has been taken so far out of context as to dilute my original intent, which was to reduce some drama, not add politics, but seems moot at this point. I don't blame anyone as it is a heated affair with widely varying opinions. Like other heated debates, sometimes a message gets lost in a sea of pitchforks and torches. What affects me most is that many of the people I respect the most have either retired or become inactive due to this debacle. That list includes people I consider mentors and compatriots.

6388:

will not accept such moves from the community. They’ve resisted multiple good-faith ideas, proposals, &c., and still have not really even accepted that there is a problem. I personally think that ArbCom is the best route at this point, and really the only option that hasn’t been exhausted. Writing a request shouldn’t be that hard, and I’d be certainly willing to help out in the event that that was decided. Either way, action must be taken, soon. I don’t think it is appropriate to let this drift into the past yet again.

4785: 6581:

oversighted isn't evidence, it is lack of evidence. This is why I said it has to go to Arb. As an admin, I can't even see the edits. I am not going to blindly take the word of anyone, this is a ban discussion, after all. It isn't personal, I'm also not accepting Ironholds or the Oversighters's opinions blindly. Arbs all have Oversight tools. There is some evidence that it wasn't really outing as well. Honestly, I have no opinion on whether the evidence supports banning or not, as I haven't seen it.

3692: 1947: 1159: 31: 6746: 4330: 4255: 4114: 2815: 1374: 7890:

board bringing these matters up, I would have to list the suspected socks there, and chances are those boards would send me back here to open an SPI first to see if they should be treated as one user vs many users behaving the same way. And instead of jumping around from board to board, I felt it was best to start with an SPI before reporting the user(s). Please read the 'edit summary' here of one of the suspected socks I had listed

5379: 6355:

and become part of the solution, merge the political projects together so they aren't biased. (the others have similar problems, but aren't active). I don't know, but it isn't likely a small thing. The discussion we started actually helped because it stopped the disruption itself, giving us a little time to figure out how to deal with the inherent bias without having to rush. But it is time to make a move, one way or another.

3264:

isn't running again, I have no idea who of those is running and who isn't outside of him. Being an Arb is a thankless job and I'm quite sure it is a pain in the ass, so I try to cut a little slack, but I am frustrated at the choices that a few of them have made recently. In spite of what others may think, Malleus is rather incidental to my frustration and my concern is with the consistency and equity with the system

7617:

eventually run, any feedback on how to improve myself as a contributor would be much appreciated. (I know that right now I'm at least six months out from running. This is because of work/personal commitments that have kept me from editing Knowledge at consistent levels for the time being, and because of a low-ish percentage of articlespace edits that I'm seeking to improve.) Thanks in advance for any response.

4886:, nothing else to know about that right, you being a librarian is plenty qualification enough. Next, File movers do a lot of things that admin do as well, which is to change the file names from "DCS19293.jpg" to something useful like "Red 1956 Chevrolet Corvette convertible.jpg" and maybe add a category or two, then go back in all the places it was linked and repair to the new name. Reading up on 4492:

block and explain it in better detail than I can. That is what it boils down for admin: how sure are you? Kind of sure? Not good enough. Reasonably sure? Not good enough. Better than 80% sure? Probably good enough to block. After all, waiting costs nothing, but blocking (and being wrong) can cost an editor. When you are wrong, that is a real person on the other end of that signature.

8245:. I did not cause the problem he is talking about, and he has wrongly accused me. So, please ignore this issue he has caused. Buster7- I'm really disappointed that you would do such a thing. I don't want to hear any more of the "why's". Please. I really think that you're nice, but don't spread my business around like dirt. It's insulting and unfair. And stop stalking me. It's uncomfortable. 4879: 451:

has been in a while, with just 20 open and 5 pending or closed. We were at over 40 open for a very long time, which means we aren't handling them in a timely fashion. It does come in waves, and I think we are understaffed to deal with even a moderate peak. CUs and clerks need to do more than just work SPI. Not healthy to only spend time there and not edit and work other areas.

6143:. I rarely give permissions and only to people I've researched a great deal or whom I am very familiar. I'm stingier with them than most, I suppose, and those guys know what to look for and do a much better job at determining than I possibly can. Honestly, I'm so overbooked I can't keep up with the load I have to do more research. I haven't even been able to do any real 4215:

it) there wasn't a stomach to start a case. I don't have a problem with those that take issue with Malleus, but this is not a "brave" way to deal with the concerns. At a glance, your case looks like a "now that we have a foot in the door, lets slam the door wide open" situation as well. Any editor who is not in the public favor, such as Malleus, doesn't stand a chance.

4540:

not responding to my query on his talk page reinforces my suspicion that these two are the same person. But there's not enough evidence for others to go on, and at least, if they are the same person, he's not using both accounts to get his way at an article. Not yet at least. I'll leave you or someone else to add a Welcome template on Rogr101's talk page.

7893:. Doesn't that fall under 'personal attack' according to Knowledge's guidelines? So if this user is in fact using socks, there may be more of those kind of edit summaries and I don't feel that would be considered editing in a civil manner. I may not be available on Monday or Tuesday but I'm not sure yet, so I just wanted to get this in now. Thank you. 8300:. Results are the guru. Had I not interceded who knows how many new editors might have been affected. I'm not the least bit interested in the emotional machinations of a child. False witness, indeed. I always admit my mistakes. This fiasco was not one of them. You will find me under the dresser in the corner over there with the rest of the 529:. The lynch mob mentality has been in full swing in your absence. Take a look at Malleus at Arb, where someone asked for a clarification of a previous rule and it turned into a motion to ban, when the reporter wasn't even complaining about Malleus. He is one vote away from a ban, after following the rules of the previous sanctions. 7986:

account. Not to mention the long history of this user and the past 55 or so sock accounts. I appreciate you looking again. If you don't have the time for this case, maybe another clerk can take a look then? There's also been some new evidence where Fleris has made new reverts that reverted to an IP address located in Greece as well.

3469:

falls into that classification and doesn't require a debate. The offending party should simply strike or remove the comment and clarify. If they do that, I would personally consider it sufficient to just move on. The goal is to facilitate reasonable conversation, which can get heated sometimes, but using

8429:

That is true. If needed, it shouldn't be difficult to get someone uninvolved to look at it. He is a bit bullheaded, but as Ryan pointed out, his question had gone unanswered. To be frank, I am less inclined to be patient with a single minded SPA than I am someone who is generally trying to improve

8240:

Buster. I can't believe you would blame me for that. That wasn't even my fault that was someone elses! I realized that you over react and you "alert the media" which I really don't appreciate. You've made me feel threatened and alone. You've been really welcoming and nice, but now, I've realized that

8119:

This issue deals directly with Editor Retention and how New Editors should be protected from factors they know nothing about. They dont know but they are being fed poisoned food. That may be extreme but only to express my alarm and fear. The new users this editor adopts are, without a doubt, in harms

7641:

I'm finishing up one right now, but have been tied with Arbitration and other drama filled events as of late. I will try to take a look in the next day or two and see if the basics are there for a full review and respond here. I would rather wait than be sloppy about these kinds of things, and I've

7466:

I think all that is a bit presumptive, and I'm more inclined to let the community's voice be heard on it. It is at WP:RFAR and I was actually hoping they would take it, even if as less than a full case, so that something with some teeth can be achieved. For now, I would remain neutral on your idea,

7217:

You're the CU, I will adjust as needed. Normally if a CU just says "no technical connection", I do go and try to compare behavior, it just looked like you had already done that step, based on your wording, and that no one else needed to duplicate the efforts. I will give it a look later if someone

6886:

If it works correctly, you should get "user" and "page" tabs that open up into sub-menus that have links to all kinds of useful things like rights, logs, contributions, subpages, blocks, wikichecker, and geolocate (only works on IPs). It looks like it has extra things in there for admins that I can't

6879:

Since I've stolen a few tools from your commons.js page, I thought I'd let you know about one that I've been working on. I pieced it together using code from a current Gadget and code from a retired user who wrote a predecessor to the gadget. (I had been using the gadget but didn't like it because it

6580:

Actually, I've been pretty consistent about these things, that everyone at Knowledge should be treated fairly and equitably, regardless of how popular or unpopular they are. I haven't given an opinion on whether or not he should be banned, my opinion was based solely on process. The fact that it was

6559:

In my view you generally get things right, but your comments at ANI and the arbcom request case are surprising. You say, we don't know enough to evaluate. Well, two members of the oversight team saw the material; one suppressed it, the other agreed (posting on ANI) that that was the right decision.

6387:

What we had on the talk page was essentially an RfC. There is no reason to go through the process of starting a formal version. Retitling and merging are a waste of time. These have been tried before (I proposed a retitling discussion about a year ago), and they will not work. The project “hierarchy”

5547:

of those that are on strike to peacefully voice their opinions. There is no leadership that I'm aware of, only a group of deeply concerned people who are being mislabeled and reviled for being loyal volunteers. There is room for all opinions here, and the lack of tolerance for them is symptomatic of

4604:

One more thing: Before this discussion is archived, I wanted to note here that they are both currently editing film-related articles. So if there is ever a sockpuppet case brought up against Ewawer in the future, that could be presented as evidence. Other than that, I don't have much more to state on

4539:

Well... Just like I expected (and as noted, it is characteristic of Ewawer), Rogr101 didn't reply. He continued editing after the message, and a few hours after he stopped, Ewawer finally continued editing; I saw this when it was happening, but am just now commenting here about it. Obviously, Rogr101

4214:

Yes, it wasn't my idea and I wouldn't have recommended it. The reporting party wasn't sure how to determine "involved", so I kind of listed even though I'm not really involved, per our standard definition. I do believe they have made an enormous jump there, going to a motion because (as one arb put

3455:

I don't have the link, so I'm having to offer an opinion based only on your statement. To me, if someone simply says "that is false and libelous", then that isn't so much a legal threat as a personal attack, and should be removed as such. Calling an action "libel" implies intent, that the statement

697:

I have to be honest, I agree with you assessment that no index is the best thing for this stuff, but I am totally unfamiliar with consensus on page in user space using them. I also checked the archives and see a bunch of RFC/Us that don't have no index in them. Is this a user space only thing? I'm

450:

I understand. I've mentioned the shortage to some CUs, who likely already knew that of course, but really had not heard anything but silence on the subject, so I have no idea if they agreed or not. I've noticed some Arbs getting more involved in CU as well. It does look more caught up today than it

181:

You have to sign up there to clerk, and I've been begging for us to take on new clerks but none of the CUs have been willing to. As it is now, my trainer retired, Tiptoety, and I'm still "just a trainee" so I can't train. We are in a catch 22, with not enough clerks and not enough trainers to train

8406:

In response to this discussion and the note left on my talk page, I have no patience for editors who resurrect content issues that have already clearly reached consensus with a rehash of the arguments they lost before. That said, although I have no problem reverting the changes (within limits), as I

7985:

Thank you. If CU can only go back 90 days, I believe a few of these accounts edited within the past 90 days, Koyrda66, Fleris, 212.251.116.91, 212.251.116.20. And then on behavior alone, it is a long list, but the fact that these accounts reverted to the same edits of the others should be taken into

7729:

I hate to do this, but I really don't have the time to do either right now. I still have one unfinished, and a ton of other projects that aren't finished, and I just don't want to half way do something. Plus work has picked up a great deal and I don't have as much time to spend. I just don't want

7442:

I see no reason to agree to an interaction ban, nor should one be imposed. It has been many months since I have said anything rude to YRC, and I have no intention of resuming. As for starting the ANI thread on outing -- that was an entirely proper action on my part: for those (like me) who did not

7201:

where one of the parties was editing thru a proxy, and another admin blocked as a duck. I'll mark a case checked if I've checked but want someone else to look at it - but I have only recently started doing this, I used to leave it as open before, so say if you would prefer me to do that. I'll close

7196:

Hi Dennis. I didn't realise you'd closed it. Dominus Vobisdu and IRWolfie have also presented some evidence based on behaviours that a CU couldn't identify as the edits are all too old. In such cases I'll mark it as checked, but won't close it because closer examination of the behaviour evidence may

6617:

I need a little admin break, so I won't be around much through this weekend, if at all. Can't remember taking a single day off here in 6 months, and I need to get outdoors. You know, go look at that big yellow ball in the sky, do some yardwork, fresh air and all that. If something needs looking at

6296:

I think if you still feel you've got a community option left to try, it's probably worth trying it. This Wikiproject hasn't been all over DRN/AN/ANI/Jimbo's talkpage, so it doesn't have the feel to me of a major conduct issue (at least not yet). If you want to bring an RfAR, you really need to show

6281:

Other than ArbCom, the best option seems to me to be, maybe, to propose a retitling or merger of the project with WikiProject Politics, and maybe filing an RfC on the proposal, saying basically, as per RGloucester above, that the basic preliminary discussion seems to have ended, and time has come to

5990:

never even answered my concern. That he didn't vote (but didn't officially recuse) is not the same, particularly since my concerns were never even acknowledged after politely but directly being expressed on his talk page. You guys know how I am, I'm funny about "respect" that way. But, it isn't my

5985:

to Malleus, even if the discussion is about an FA or article, for as soon as someone says "he is at RfA", Malleus must shut up or risk banning again. Why they chose to word this so poorly, when clarity would have been just as easy, I have no idea. Arb has jumped out of the frying pan, and into the

5871:

Thanks, Dennis...I reverted all the garbage from the Notable list in that article several days ago, and as of yet, none of it has re-appeared. The only problem I had is the absolute stupidity in the comments at the userpage. Sorry, I know...AGF. The only good faith I can offer is that the editor,

4860:

Hi Dennis, I'd like to ask for another set of permissions, as you suggested in your RfA review for me. Even though pending changes isn't enabled, I think I'd be a competent reviewer. You seem to have given me a good lookover for that review, but if you'd like to know any more before giving me such a

4491:

Just keep an eye out. If I block someone, I have to be able to explain in fine detail why, they they are related, and how I've ruled "coincidence". There is no doubt that you would know better than I here, as you are familiar and "gut instinct" can play a role. If you had the admin bit, you could

4476:

Yes, again looking at the articles Rogr101 has edited and analyzing the contribution histories of those articles, I see how it can be stated that there isn't yet much of an overlap; that's the only thing that adds doubt in my head that they are the same person, because Rogr101 is editing topics that

2904:

for opinions. ;) I like the existing one at Stevens city, by a large margin. The colors provide additional information and the compact nature makes it easier to compare months. I've only done a couple of those charts, and wouldn't have even considered using your first example, which is larger and

2226:

I respect if an Arb thinks the ban should take place, even if I strongly disagree. I do think it should have been a case, not a motion in an unrelated request for clarification, which looks like a backdoor attempt to ban him, even if it isn't. And yes, I completely agree that some changes might be

1804:

I've made a couple of minor comments in other areas. Will have to ponder more before adding anything else. Civility is more a concept than a tangible thing, so we have to be really careful how we define what is and isn't civil. The idea that we shouldn't use ad hominem on talk pages I agree with,

1731:

And I appreciate the sincere and thoughtful discussion. Even though my opinion hasn't changed on this one proposal, I've gained some experience understanding why some want the AdminCom or similar, so that helps me as well. And of course, you are always welcome to come here and discuss any topic, I

1557:

management doesn't work very well in a volunteer organization. Redundancy and handling everything at the lowest possible level does work, which is why many organization shun top down methods. They can be inefficient and bad for morale, as people at the lowest level are less emotionally invested in

1216:

I was being generic, and I am a Yankee, so I'm not familiar with all the other old services. If I were looking at CU data, I likely would learn it soon enough, I suppose. But it was likely and old style service, based on her cryptic response. I have trouble reading Elen sometimes, but CUs have to

854:

user has used the same IPs, to pick up new accounts you didn't know about. Checking for sleepers takes longer and is only done when that is likely to be the issue. You have to ask for a sleeper check manually, and they might not run it anyway. CU has final decision on all things CU. I can't even

8466:

I am not sure what you mean by SPA and other such comments. I am new to wikipedia editing and I decided to start because I am interested in this particular person since he is a personal hero to several people from India, including myself. I have attempted to put together data for every single award

7913:

accounts. I will go and check the ONE current editor, but you presented a wall of info that was mainly very, very stale. If an account hasn't edited in the last couple of months. No admin is likely to spend the great deal of time needed to establish a link, with the goal of "stopping" the editor,

6589:

seen the evidence to make the decision, some who have personal vendettas, is not optimal. He is already blocked, a short delay while we do this the right way, the fair way, doesn't cost us anything. So I haven't disagreed (or agreed) with your conclusion, I just want us to do this the right way,

6354:

The last two or three weeks, I've been really thinking about alternatives, trying to avoid Arb simply because I prefer to handle problems at the lowest level possible. I've got a couple of ideas, but I need a few days off, then come back with a fresh perspective. Maybe we just need to all join up

6227:

The problem being that it is election season for ArbCom, I fear, and I would imagine a desire to not take on anything for a few months, which is unfortunate. I've emailed a few times asking for guidance, and Elen was kind enough to reply back to ask more info, but I haven't seen anything in reply.

5916:

Malleus is topic banned from making edits concerning the RFA process anywhere on the English Knowledge. As an exception, he may ask questions of the candidates and express his own view on a candidate in a specific RFA (in the support, oppose, or neutral sections), but may not engage in any threaded

4443:

Overlap is different than Editor A stopping on Monday, and Editor B starting on Tuesday. They have to be intermingled. I'm not saying "no", I'm saying wait a bit. The one has only had one edit since the second editor started. Jumping into an investigation too soon is the primary cause of "might

2715:

I came across this article indirectly through CSD. A nightmare. I removed entire sections from it that made me cringe to look at them, and then I stopped before I slashed the article any further. If you're feeling masochistic - or, better still, if one of your page stalkers is an expert in Islam -

2670:

So my instinct was right. Back when I patrolled regularly, the backlog was closer to 15 to 20 days, but I tried to always work from the back to keep any from falling off the fact of the page. You miss the "low hanging fruit", but that was never my goal, it was to cleanup after they had a go at it

2521:

And I'm much more tolerant of pointy discussion on my talk page than at ANI, where my objective is to reduce drama and keep the discussion moving in as positive a fashion as possible. Since MONGO and I have very different opinions on a variety of issues (but no animosity toward each other), I felt

2505:

is the tone of a rightwinger who is listening to too much rightwing talk radio. Obviously MONGO does not like that observation, because it's accurate. He couldn't say that he doesn't occasionally sound like Glenn Beck, and I was trying to give him the feedback that he does, and that it doesn't help

2211:

I'm no fan of Malleus but there's no arguing that he's a first class content editor and perhaps one of the best and most prolific we have. That makes him very much a Wikipedian, and Jclemens comment was beyond the pale. Bit late now, but it might have set a precedent to have taken him to

911:

It depends. But no, if a CU uses a "checkuserblock" I can not unblock them regardless. That is a special type of block, meaning "I know things you don't". Technically, it is just a block, but the summary will indicate that it is a cu block and reversing one can get you desysoped. Also, not every

7889:

Just one more thing to add. The reason I came to the SPI board first was so that the suspected socks could be investigated to see if they are in fact 'one' user. The concerns I have go beyond that - which involve fraud, ethnical/cultural issues, etc. But I had a feeling that if I went to any other

7778:. He appears to not have been given any warning about legal threats before being blocked out of hand. Obviously the editor is a bit clueless, with the block evasion, but it certainly doesn't merit the indefinite block (has anyone actually explained the issue to him, he doesn't know what's going on 7307:

Kind of late, since he is already blocked. Annoying works with people who are unresponsive when you have tried time and time again to communicate with them, but they won't talk page, AND they haven't been blocked yet....but are about to be. This edit was not only blocked, and it looks like a ban

4372:

There are some users' editing habits that I know so well that I'd recognize them almost instantly and I believe this to be the case with Rogr101, and I commented as much on his user talk page. So where do I go with this from here? It doesn't seem that this needs reporting since the Ewawer account,

3640:

No problem, I'm always open to explaining my actions, particularly when they aren't obvious at first blush. I generally revert socks/trolls as a rule, and if anyone reverts me, I leave it alone and out of respect for the regular editors of that article. At the end of the day, the quality of the

3468:

as well. There are circumstances where the phrase might be used and the totality of the statement could be said to have "a chilling effect" (the standard for legal threat) as well, but context matters. If it is a borderline case, it is better to just handle as a personal attack, since it clearly

3281:

My comment "It appears I have little support" was referring only to the lack of interested parties on that one Arb's page. As to the level of support elsewhere on Knowledge, I feel very fortunate that many editors have been quite generous in their overall support, as well as very forgiving for my

3263:

If you concern is about Jclemens, NewYorkBrad, Calisper, SirFozzie, David Fuchs, Elen of the Roads, Xeno or PhilKnight, I think they are up for election in November and the best way to handle it is to vote, as no proceeding would likely be done in time to make a difference. I heard that SirFozzie

1286:

Finally getting to listen to it now. Had to down a pair of plum trees, 20 footers, log and stack the brush. Tired now. That is an unusual blend of flamenco, with just a touch of Middle-east blended in, and a nice syncopated beat behind it. Reminds of something I would listen to in my medicinal

916:

indef a sock, but I see exceptions a few times a week, ie: the Master's name is actually a bad user name, so we just swap them around and indef it, and let them keep the sock after a short vacation. Stuff like that. That is the key, learning the nuances. But the "clerking" part of SPI Clerks is

8347:

In regards to Tib42, he’s not entirely at fault. He attempted to discuss the issue and we sort of “wikifilibustered” by not engaging in discussion. The discussion wasn’t a long one in which overwhelming consensus was reached after a good discussion on all points. The discussion was closed with

8304:

fuzzballs. Or, maybe I'll retire to that safe room that was reserved for you. The only good thing about all this is to meet Cindaruse and Keindra. Last comment:I did not over-react. Now I'm a stalker. Someone needs to sit this child down and explain how things work around here. I have removed all

7908:

Ok, went back and looked. The main reason I closed it because almost all the editors haven't edited recently. Not even in the last few months. This raises two problems: 1. CU can only check back 90 days, so CU would be useless. 2. It would have to be determined solely by behavior. This is a

4428:

You mean article overlap? Like I stated, they have that. And per my analysis above, I'm certain that both editors are the same person. Then again, I have been familiar with this editor since 2007. But I don't see anything that indicates that he needs to be blocked. It's just that even though he's

1684:

You already have the right to nominate and vote for the actual admin, but you choose to not do so. It doesnt' take even 5 hours to do a reasonable background search. I do admin reviews all the time. And you do rely on your own searching, the opinions of others you trust who are voting, and the

1552:

moving forward, and do a great many admin reviews, in addition to participating in most RfAs. I'm of the belief that as we grow, we need to shift more power away from the top, and empower non-admins as well. The plan you are supporting would do the exact opposite, by concentrating more power in

970:

Regarding "in depth checks", the only way a check could not be in depth is if the checkuser on the case decided simply not to look at half of the data returned by the check, in which case he should almost certainly not be a checkuser. This is especially true since the tool can often tell you that

8213:

got involved because of (1) all the hard work that was required to fix the confusion that one of Raiden/Deidras adoptees caused at an article, (2) supported the fact that Raiden/Deidra's improper instructions caused the confusion, and (3) removed the Adoption Box from Raiden/Deidra's page. Her

7616:

I noticed that you stated on your user page that you were willing to give editor reviews to people mildly interested in RfA. I've been mulling over an adminship run for a while and am looking for feedback on how to improve myself in preparation for this. Regardless of whether or not I decide to

5700:

scanner will only allow access by yourself and neccesary Foundation personnel (The folks you see with the white lab coats and the golden shoulder epillettes. The folks without the epillettes are Security). Your use of the room is completely self-determined and, once you enter, assistance will be

4524:

Thanks, Dennis. I don't want Ewawer blocked, though, as mentioned. Not unless he inappropriately continues to use both accounts, if he is operating both accounts that is. But whether Rogr101 is Ewawer or not, I think it's safe to state that he isn't new to editing Knowledge. He might have been a

1867:

if it wasn't at all on topic. That is only when I'm an uninvolved editor. I think you will always have to have it removed by someone uninvolved (no need to be an admin really) for the concept to be accepted. While it isn't currently policy, I think most admin would support an uninvolved editor

1651:

I want the right to democratically nominate a proxy, someone I trust to speak for me in this selection process. That is, I want a say in who becomes an admin, but I don't want to have to put in 5, 10, or 20 hours doing the background research necessary to do that well, and neither should all the

1633:

representative selection process, not less. Presently admins are selected by whoever turns up at RfA, and as far as I can see, most !voters are doing so on flimsy criteria. I rarely !vote because I rarely know enough about the candidate to make a valuable judgment; and that is the case with many

1095:

A likely scenario where a check for sleepers might take longer is if socks are found over a relatively wide dynamic range that is also shared by other, unrelated users. In that case, separating the wheat from the chaff might take considerably longer (especially if the range is busy) than if the

611:

He is a new user, so I don't want to block him off the bat. I left a polite but blunt notice on his talk page, explaining why he can't add the material back without going to the talk page, and explaining he will be blocked if he continues to edit war. Most of the time, this is enough to either

6266:

Dennis, there's only so many ways I can say this - and I seem to have said it several times now. If you want to get Arbcom involved in this, you will have to bring a case. The Committee can't say whether or not it would take a case unless someone lays the evidence out on all sides, and it can

6060:

This may not be the right venue, but what the heck. First, I'll agree the wording isn't ideal. We may yet (shudder) be facing a clarification request. Back on point, I read it a bit more narrowly. The ban relates to the RFA process, in the first sentence. It is broadened slightly in the second,

8261:

Buster is harmless, a little fuzzball, he just got a little bent out of shape. You shouldn't be adopting people yet Deidra, and the damage it can cause got him upset, maybe a little too much, but his heart was in the right place. Your heart was in the right place by wanting to help people, I

3855:

Someone had to stop his madness ;) And since I've been dragged into the current Arb debacle by being named as an involved party (really, I wasn't, but I didn't have much of a choice once declared), I guess it is poking a little fun at myself, while reminding us all what we are really here for,

1116:

Oh no Deskana, never apologize for educating me, I'm genuinely interesting in understanding better for probably obvious reasons. And thanks for your explanation as well Coren. The more I know, the more effective I can be. Often, I will have an idea of the range that is likely to be used by

921:

admin Clerks do both. Some don't actually. We have a couple clerks that mainly shuffle papers rather than make blocks. All Clerks are expected to do more than do the blocks, however, and must shuffle the paperwork. It is not too hard to learn, but there are very specific ways to do it. I

5779:

And now a new IP is adding more defamation. see last section. Not as severe, but at a loss. Can I just delete this obvious nonsense? Silly season applies to more than just the election. Just realized the time back east, so I am just gonna ignore til tomorrow. sorry to bother you so late.

5026:

No problem. I have done the exact thing once or twice as a clerk, outlined a beautiful explanation of how the two editors "must" be the same, to have the CU reply on the investigation page only with the line "Where is the abuse?" That takes the air of your balloon after all that work, so I

4525:

different registered user or editing as only an IP before now, but editors who are truly new to Knowledge don't use "Ce" (which is of course short for "copyedit") in their edit summaries when they edit Knowledge...unless they learn it; it's something you learn from others while editing here.

3625:

Gotcha! I was confused that such an experienced admin would have made that revert, but it makes sense that you were viewing it through a different lens based on data I was not seeing; I do think the content as provided, even by a potential sock, is a huge improvement over the prior content,

2958:

so far, but want to get a wide variety of opinions before I go nuts and start editing away. So far it's 1 for compact and colors, 2 for large and intuitive and 1 on the fence. I am thinking of a way to somehow create one that is both large and intuitive, but has the colors...kind of a

7946:

I've looked, and I can't definitively link. It is possible, but I'm not convinced enough to block. I notice they reported you to SPI, and you got a block (later overturned) so I have to wonder if it is a personal issue between the two of you. This would be beyond the scope of SPI.

4429:

been around since 2007, he's unfamiliar with most of Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If he participated in talk page discussions more often, he wouldn't be. But there is also the option of just reading up on those things oneself, which I don't believe he's done for the most part.

3509:

I'm not touching on the NLT aspect as others have already done so. However, although I am unsure how it works in the US, here in the UK libel and slander have one principle difference in law: the former is written and the latter is spoken. Either can be defamation of character etc. -

2081:

Heh, none of us makes that much difference, but, collectively, we may have some soothing influence. At the moment, I'm just waiting to see if my close of the latest ANI discussion holds. I probably won't be around tonight, though. All I can do is hope that people will stop piling it

8241:

I was wrong about you. You're really nice, so don't take this the wrong way, but I can't believe you would do such a horrible thing to me! Dennis,you don't mind, please ignore the issue. If you don't want to, it's okay, but I'd like you to. Also Dennis, Buster7 has accused me under

3105:

I think everyone would agree with you that consistency is a good thing and why fix what ain't broken. I will put it up for a !vote once I get all the bugs worked out on WP:MOS, but I have a feeling it won't come out on top. :) Thanks for your opinion (you too Go Phightins!). -

2457:

I have left notices in a number of venues, formally asking Jclemens to recuse himself. As I've said everywhere, it isn't personal, it is about protecting the integrity of the process. He did finally strike the one comment, which is helpful, but doesn't erase the obvious bias.

1567:

We have some exceptional talent at Knowledge. Our best authors are not admin. They are people who don't want to be bothered with mopping up, and just want to create content. They depend on a system that allows them to be left alone, yet they can participate at any level

6028:. That they exist is enough to ban him. Actually, the remedy is "block", but it will instantly be at Arb with a ban discussion, the way this one degraded when it was only a clarification request. There are a number of people willing to file it there, of this I am sure. 7283: 966:

Checking for sleepers creates no difference in how long it takes to carry out the check; it might take much more time or may take much less time, depending on the nature of the technical evidence. If anything, checking for sleepers is easier and less time consuming, not

3072:

I have to admit that I like consistency in the encyclopedia. Whatever we choose, it should probably be used wiki-wide. That might need a larger discussion once you have fine tuned it on one of the MOS pages, and a bot to change all the cities if your ideas won out.

7400:

I've asked, and so has YRC, for a mutual interaction ban between YRC and Nomoskedasticity. By all means formalise what Prioryman proposes here, but please leave the thread open while we await Nomo's response; and the sub-thread calling for a boomerang is unresolved.

5980:

This was ill worded from the beginning. Again. As soon as Malleus mentions someone who is at RfA on his talk page, even if the discussion isn't about the RfA, someone will drag him to Arb Enforcement. That means that anyone who files a RfA will instantly become

7419:

Has anyone asked Nomo about an IBAN? There's no proposal or voting on one on AN/I. I would suggest dealing with Nomo/YRC and myself/YRC as two distinct issues - whether Nomo agrees to an IBAN or not has no bearing on YRC and I agreeing (as we have already done).

440:

The "real" discussion is ongoing on the functionary mailing list between the checkusers. It really is just my fault: we obviously all perceived the need for new clerks, but I didn't notice the talk starting yesterday afternoon before I decided being bold. :-)

2020:

If you weren't so important to keeping ANI less horrible, I'd tell you to unwatch it. Maybe if you left, the vitriol would rise to a level where it ceases all functioning. Soon enough people would learn to solve their problems without begging for a ban or a

6183:

Until the final outcome of Pending Changes is known, it appears that admins have apparently (and probably wisely) self-imposed a moratorium on granting Reviewer rights. There are already over 5,000 editors with this right so there is no urgency.

922:

wouldn't endorse or decline or do anything "clerky" until you are listed as a clerk. They haven't accepted you as clerk yet, although it is obvious that I think you would do well enough that I was willing to bump you to the head of the line as a trainee.

5475:

That is a left over right that isn't currently active. I've not given, as I don't want it to look like hat collecting with an unusable user right. I still need to read up more about pending changes myself, I'm not sure how any of that is going to work.

392:

a discussion started about promotions – so I ended up jumping the gun and overriding everyone else by fiat. :-) I hope you'll forgive me if I say that you shouldn't consider my promoting you as valid until the discussion takes its course. I didn't even

6282:

make a decision. If, as some projects, including Conservatism, have done in the past, and the Conservatism project talk page is redirected to the WikiProject Politics talk page, I think most of the problems might be at least basically addressed. Maybe.

4960:

and have given the required information and evidence there. I believe it would be quite easy for any SPI clerk like you to have a review over it and endorse/approve it so that Investigation completes soon, and we all get the results soon ;) Regards.

5872:

and I still think it is just one or a connected group, legitimately feels that these people belong and do not understand the concept of notability, and are apparently ready to lie, fabricate or whatever else it takes to get their people on a list.

6838:

I was just thinking I needed to thank you for submitting. That is my third, I've upped my ratio to one every two years! I'm still working on the auto articles, which I'm hoping to have to at least GA quality by the time I get them to mainspace.

2171:, and he did this right before Arb elections this year, which is unfortunate timing for him as I sincerely doubt that the public will forget this. It is one thing to support the ban, everyone has opinions and I respect that, but to declare him 8008:

It is not a personal issue. My case was already discussed with the Arb Committee. The case I provided here shows diffs with evidence and has nothing to do with anything else. If you like me to ask another Administrator to look at this, I will.

6680:

Ignoring all rules, I unilaterally accord Dennis permission to take the weekend off without an RfC to decide. I'm not on strike (yet) and though I can't do it as well as Dennis I will be quite happy to hold the fort alone...

3779:

I am far from the best editor we have here, that is certain, and have never reviewed a GA, but I will be happy to take a look and offer any assistance I can. Even though I'm an old man, I am still a student when it comes to quality prose.

7384:

YRC and I have both agreed to a voluntary IBAN, as proposed on AN/I, and I've offered to withdraw my request for a site ban so that we can move on from this matter. Would you be up for implementing the IBAN and updating AN/I on the result?

1780:

While I think about that, can I just say we've got a real problem at Knowledge with the general quality of argument. I'm no expert rhetorician but I've read a little about it and ours is crap. One major element of this is the tolerance for

2580:

I have been going through and patrolling some of the unpatrolled user talk pages and I was wondering if there is a specific reason that the earliest pages listed there are only a month old? Are pages automatically patrolled after a month?

337:

Ouch. Real life is the first priority. My wife has been gone for days, family illness, and just got home. That is MY priority right now, just being with the most important person in my life. So I will wish you all a good evening. :)

5848:

As I have pointed out to GTW, during the protection period, I will be verifying the current information for this HS and for Whitney Young, another Chicgoland HS article with potential vandal presense. I'm not sure if WYHS is protected.

6702:

That didn't work out so well. I've received more email in the last 24 hours than you can shake a stick at, plus the YRC/ANI/Arb issue. sigh... Will try to take a break again after the Wikiproject Conservatism case is over, I guess.

3162:

I don't like it as well. The other chart, the colors varied according to the numbers. Higher numbers had different colors, so it showed a gradient. This was true for rain, highs, lows, sunshine, etc. Now it is just flat numbers.

6564:

a problem. (Now, on top of that, I saw it before it was oversighted -- even if one doesn't agree that it was outing, there was an aggressive, taunting quality to it that amounts to a blatant violation of the civility restriction.)

7504:

Hi Dennis. I've read other editors' descriptions of your mentorship experience but I don't think I've read a comprehensive summary from you. If you have posted it, could you please point me to it; if you haven't, would you like to?

5891: 5701:

provided within 24 hours (They are a bit short-staffed). Just make yourself comfortable in the middle of the room. The padding and the lack of furniture are for your protection. Someone will be with you shortly. Have a nice day! ```

793:

Cool gruel - lol - learning is a tough process - so it seems - (no link though...) - pages moved to process are automatically NOINDEX-ed but pages in userspace are not and need NOINDEX-ing to stop them appearing in google results -

5339:

I see it is at MfD, I've voiced in there. Best to leave it to that discussion. I wasn't sure if we agreed on that point or not, glad to see we do. As a community, we need to stop nickel and diming our editors over minor things.

3393:

Hey man, I understand there is a good bit of admin politics going on right now, so I hopefully won't take up much of your time. I was just wondering, if a user expresses an opinion in a talk page that one sentence in an article is

2506:

his case one bit. Not an "attack", just an honest question and some honest feedback -- pointedly formulated, yes, but at least it's no libelous lie of the sort MONGO likes to tell. Anyway, just wanted to get that off my chest. --

7871:

Hi. I see that you are away for the weekend so don't worry about replying to this until you get back. I have some concerns about the SPI case I had opened recently. Could you please explain to me why you dismissed this case --

2769:

I no longer see an email tab when I look at your page. I have something sensitive I would like to discuss with you. I am not sure if it is a matter of settings or what, but I have email enabled so could you drop me a line?

595:

seems intent on causing a edit war with contributions which are unreferenced and appear to be POV. I would be grateful for your advice on whether you consider the page should be protected. With best regards, as ever, David.

3015:

are cool to me and different from everything else, but then again so am I. :) I figure people will say "don't rock the boat" and keep things as they are, which is cool. I can accept that, I just like being different. :) -

2909:

more in order to glean information from it. The second one seems more intuitive. Might be because I'm used to it, but I think the compact nature and colors are the real reason. "Tacky" isn't a big deal to me if it is more

6121:

Hello Sir,I recently got rollback rights after some good work related to vandalism and apart from that i want to get reviewer rights too then what to do and where to improve myself so i will able to grab reviewer rights in

1553:

fewer people. When I said I would hand in my admin bit and retire Knowledge if that type of policy was enacted, I wasn't being melodramatic. And I wouldn't be alone. Too much power at the top always leads to corruption.

3991:". As I would not say Mitt Romney is against abortion except for rape victims I would say except for cases of rape. Also If you could check out the talkpage for Tom Smith for that sections other problems it would be great 1471:

I've replied there. Seems to be a bit of overreactions in a situation where they could just add a touch more criticism if they felt it was necessary, without changing the quality of the article, and without delisting it.

7311:. Actually, that entire ban discussion was premature and not in good form. The indef seems to have support. If he can "get it", he can request an unblock. I may look it closer tomorrow, I'm likely out for the night. 8369:

Actually, he is an SPA who may have a COI and has only continued to add them back, pushing the bounds of good faith to its limit. Granted, it shouldn't have been ignored. I removed the final warning from his page....

2500:

I'm fine with the redaction, as long as it's done by an uninvolved person. Just to make this very clear though: I understand that my question may be read as an attack of sorts. But it was a completely sincere question.

6023:

Oh Ryan, to answer your question: Yes, if he said something polite as he did to you, it would be grounds to permanently ban him. The wording is quite clear, and doesn't differentiate positive and negative comments.

6880:

removed a lot of helpful tabs (like watch/unwatch), and I didn't like the older code because it didn't have nearly the same functionality as the gadget.) Anyway if you'd like to take it for a test drive, the code is

5324:

and it could use some level heading admining from you; I would consider it a personal favor if you'd be willing to mediate. I'm done with it now, better things to do and what not. Thanks if you can offer any help.

3436:

Context is going to be the determing factor. Compare "this is false and I'm concerned it may be libelous" to "this is false and libelous and you must remove it now or face further action". Got an example in mind?

7343:

Oy, I've injected myself a bit in this matter, but I'm not ready to go out on a limb. It was all amazingly hasty, was it not? But he is still a problem editor. That doesn't mean he is beyond redemption, however.

4894:

should give you a good idea of the need and the hows, and I would recommend that as a next step. This should be pretty easy for you and I would guess to see you back in a week for the bit so you can work on it.

3227:

you have overwhelming support. I'm sure you're more well-versed in the ins and outs of Wiki-policy than I. What is the correct process to attempt to remove an arb who refuses the requests of the people to recuse?

7301: 5937:

Where would I get some clarification on this? Or Dennis, do you have a thought? Is Malleus allowed to discuss a specific RfA with the person who is or was running? For example, would the comments he left at

407:

I've reverted the SPI page and will tell Ryan. I've had one email from my trianer, and none from anyone else. I have no idea who the "real" is, which makes learning and doing rather difficult and confusing.

2167:

That has to be the stupidest act a "neutral" party can commit, and the most biased thing I've seen come out of an Arb at Arbitration. Jclemens received just 60% of the vote resulting in a one year term last

1504:

Hi. Thanks for the response. I have been expecting this day since this user appeared in WP:FAC and said those things. You guys were also worried but about something else that I don't remember. Best regards,

3268:. It is about the greater principle at work more than this individual case. Outside of elections, I am not sure what the removal process is, although I'm not ready to sign on to removing anyone just yet. 6585:, I expect us, as a community, to treat YRC the same as we would treat you or I, and make sure that before we permanently ban someone, that a fair process has been followed. Allowing 100 people who have 6483:

Dennis is away over the weekend so I hope you'll not mind me answering here. The page has now been full protected by another admin. It does seem as if 76.232.253.147 has more experience than their 24

990:

Thanks for the clarification. I can't remember where, but I was told sleeper checks took extra time, by a CU. That is odd. But most importantly, I'm glad you corrected my errors Deskana, thank you.

4948: 2045:

Oh, I'm not so sure that I make that much difference. Drama seems to find its way there just fine whether or not I'm there. I will try to keep an eye out, but have a few things going on here as well.

1334:, both of which have always evoked strong emotions. The story behind Freddie's is particularly moving, and I had always considered him the greatest male vocalist of the era. Moody day, I suppose. 6311:

Actually, the members were all over ANI before the discussion started, and then the problems stopped, and the project founder hasn't replied to any email or edited since DGG made his first edit.

8143:

Not sure what can be added on the talk page, but I agree that this is not a user we want adopting people for a variety of reasons. They don't understand policies or how things really work here.

1450: 5930: 5907: 4196: 1544:

I can tell a lot of thought went into your perspective and I respect your opinion, but this isn't the first time I've seen the idea of replacing RfA with a selection committee. I've started

1035:

That is a likely explanation. I can read httpd logs all day long, but have never seen the voodoo tools that actual CUs use, a non-CU can never understand until they have the tools in hand.

4976:

Excellent detective work, serious. But there is no abuse. Ie: no crossover in edits, no deception at AFD, so I have to assume it really is two editors that share an IP, which is allowed.

1612:

You assert that electing representatives to select and manage admins will "shift power to the top." Accountable representatives are neither above nor below the community as a whole, they're

1786: 7796:

He needs to stop using that other account, which is still socking and wait a week. I'm completely sympathetic here, but he is compounding it. I'm out of pocket this weekend (see above),

3578:. The content you reverted was actually a significant improvement over the original content in terms of both formatting and informational value, and was most definitely not a vandal edit. 2291:

I think he agrees. I didn't notice it at the time or I might have been tempted to do what Floq did, put a block template on his talk page for personal attacks, as a shot across the bow.

1067:

Indeed. These misunderstandings didn't actually affect the way you preform your duties as a clerk, so it's not really a problem in my opinion. Still, I couldn't keep my mouth shut. :-) --

6267:

evaluate the situation. None of us is going to go look at the project talkpage and say "yes, bring a case". So either bring a case or don't. It is up to you, not up to the Committee. --

5986:

fire with this one. New elections are coming up, so a partial fresh crop of Arbs will get to cut their teeth on this one soon enough, I promise. Oh well, no one asked my opinion, and

4970: 1104:

we're doing them that changes (for instance, we normally wouldn't checkuser on a very transparent duck unless there were reasons to believe that there might be more socks sleeping). —

7574:

Since he officially "rejected" me as his mentor due to my opining, and the case is ongoing, I would likely hold off. It is in the history of his talk page if anyone were interested.

4377:

attempt (albeit the wrong way to do it). We can wait for a reply, but Ewawer usually doesn't reply on his user talk page or discuss matters at/take matters to an article talk page.

963:

In terms of how one uses the checkuser tool, there's no substantial difference between checking two accounts for a relation to each other and checking a single account for sleepers.

328:

I'm still trying to fix some things in Real Life that are consuming an inordinate amount of my time. I've been out of work for a year now, this does tend to mess up priorities. —

5692:, brings to mind special arrangements that have been made to provide for your well being pursuant to your inevitable mental health issues. A special safe room has been prepared by 5737: 4590:

Nah. I meant it that I don't want the guy blocked (unless he resorts to using both accounts to get his way at an article), and, as we've agreed, there just isn't enough evidence.

5199:. Personally, I've had enough and don't care anymore. Sorry to be so negative on your talk page but it's just annoying when some of us work so hard and then this keeps happening. 5075:

is deleting entire sections which have journal article citations. Can you please take a look? I'm writing to you cause I think you are the admin who were looking into this page.

1096:

socks were found in a relatively narrow range or pretty much by themselves – in which case the sleepers stick out like sore thumbs and are easy to see. The point is, the actual

3593:

Ah, I had reverted because it was a blocked troll sock that had made that edit, but I will trust your judgement if you think it is best to put it back. Thanks for the heads up.

7443:

know Prioryman's RL identity, YRC's conduct amounted to outing, a conclusion reached also by two oversighters. (The only way to read my actions otherwise is to believe that I

6907:

Ah, sounds interesting. I will give it a spin either late tonight or tomorrow, I like to really debug new scripts so they don't go crazy and block Jimbo or anything. Thanks!

4703:

Can you userfy this article for me please, I am quite sure this fellow passes the notability guidlines such as WP:AUTHOR and GNG. I asked Boing, but he is on strike currently.

6340:

Yes, I'll take that back, they were at one point. But it really is your move - do you see a community process working, or some alternative tactic, or is RfAR the only resort.

5743: 4444:

be, but not enough evidence yet" which means a connection isn't made, and you've tipped them off. I suggest waiting a few days to see what happens, but keeping an eye out.

397:

consensus was being build; I was just clearly thinking along the same lines as everybody else alone in my room while the real discussion was taking place elsewhere. :-) —

6949:. You can copy them into your userspace if you'd like, changing the Adjwilleys to Dennis Browns. (The 1st links to the 2nd once). The second link is a direct copy-paste of 287:

Well, DoRD is still active and Berean's trainer so I think that this particular decision is his to take. :-) That said, he might simply not have thought about it yet. —

5900: 5606:

Galt is a "character" (which may be a prerequisite to become a User) but, to date, no one has assummed his moniker. User:Eubank must have read, and enjoyed, the novel. ```

6652:

First, there are no other admins - aren't they all on strike or something? Second, you need to clear this with your supervisor. Finally, enjoy your well-deserved break.--

4956:

Hello Dennis! Happy to see and talk to you after many weeks. I just recently came back after a short Wikibreak of about a month. I have started a quite simple SPI report

8305:"hooks" regarding this editor from my watchlist. I'll bet a dollar to a donut that some new miss-step is right around trhe corner. AGF goes only so far. 'nuff said. ``` 7144:

Could you please reopen the SPI on Logical 1 until Elen has time to respond to the comments just made by IRWolfie and myself? I think you closed it prematurely. Thanks.

6784: 4171: 2100:

I don't want to have to get heavy handed if it doesn't, but the drama needs to stop, that is certain. I'm dropping a note here and there, trying to smooth things over.

5806: 5755: 5466: 1920:

is uncontroversial and if we explicitly disallow it on article talk pages, eliminating it will be as simple as pointing at the policy or guideline that disallows it. --

912:

sock is indef. And I can unblock an indef sock if I want to, assuming I have a reason. There are no black and white rules, but there are rules of thumb. So yes, you

8018: 5436: 2563: 2511: 734:

Thanks Dennis I have asked at AN - its just common practice as I have experienced, I am also unaware of a link to the exact action - - so lets see what Admins say -

530: 8115:, is insisting on adopting other "fresh from the incubator" new users. Considering assorted factors it can only lead to the detriment of the New Users she adopts. 677:

page - I have explained on his talkpage - If he doesn't replace the noindex at his earliest convenience please assist in explaining the situation to him - thanks -

7198: 6349: 5893: 4062: 4000: 2979:

Keep in mind, many people don't have wide screens, or use mobile devices. There are good reasons for a compact table and contrasting color besides just "looks".

5601: 1658:

cluster of editors who turn up at RfA are doing a good job; do you think they represent my values; do you think they truly represent the community as a whole? --

102: 8080: 8050: 7995: 7941: 7779: 7730:

to do a half way job, and I know that I'm going to be very busy for the next couple of months. Sorry, but I have to decline, in order to be fair to you both.

4185: 3370: 3237: 2412:

I have no idea what is happening, but it beats the hell out of real life right now. Jclemens seems to be the subject of at least two major notice boards. WTF?--

7914:

if they have already stopped. It is pointless and CU data is only kept for 90 days, so it is useless as well. Again, I will go back and check the one now.

5673:

Uh, just because the user page is a redlink doesn't mean the account isn't registered. It has a talk page and even contribs (dating back to 2005, but still).

4849: 4817: 4099: 4033: 2698: 2665: 2635: 1252:. So the magic ball indicates that Nole (as Fancy Smith) now uses that as his mobile provider. I don't know what grannies use wherever Spar Strangled lives... 891:

You could unblock the master, right? To my knowledge, socks are indeffed, never to be unblocked, masters are blocked and treated as any other blocked editor.

7277: 7245: 6675: 6382: 6276: 2175:

and unilaterally declare him a non-Wikipedian just adds to the drama and makes blowups like tonight happen, as it declares "open season" on a fellow editor.

1023:

You're welcome. The amount of time it takes to check for sleepers does vary on a case by case basis. Perhaps they were referring to that case specifically. --

150: 6603: 6533: 6519: 6306: 6291: 6210:. There is little left to say there, and I’m rather concerned that the discussion will go nowhere, as it has in the past. Do you know anything of interest? 7190: 6502:

OK, my thanks to you! the IP and I will discuss things on the article's talk until the full protection is lifted. S/he seems amenable enough. Thanks again!

5623: 4745: 4040: 657: 639: 7696: 7669: 5503: 5054: 5021: 5003: 3528:

It is the same here, libel is written, slander is spoken. Accusing someone of either is incivil or a personal attack if it isn't substantiated, however.

3448: 3218: 2567: 2549: 2165: 1916:

is very easy to identify: it addresses the motives or competency of the interlocutor. That's about as easy to recognise as a secondary source. Recognising

702:

him to do this, even if I agree it is the best thing to do. Not sure of the authority of such a statement, simply because I've not run across it before.

7456: 3962: 3930: 3295:

As for Dan Fogelberg, that was worth a smile. I've heard a few comparisons to different people, but I don't see it. At least no on has said I look like

3067: 2485: 2452: 2421: 1499: 7974: 7757: 7714: 7601: 7569: 7551: 7371: 6730: 6690: 3901: 3500: 3328: 3252: 3209: 3190: 3120: 3100: 3030: 3006: 2973: 2941: 1929: 1895: 1858: 1832: 1759: 1726: 1712: 1667: 1599: 1465: 808: 788: 752: 729: 578: 559: 7120: 6431: 6399: 6255: 3818: 3807: 2273:

I understand, but at the same time Jclemens's statement has become an unfortunate rallying point, tending to heat things up more than cool things off.--

1361: 1314: 735: 6174: 6104: 6072: 6055: 6018: 2438: 2072: 2036: 1997: 1866:

limits it to the author of the comment, granted, but more than a few times I have replaced the offending comments with <uncivil comment removed: -->

1172: 949: 906: 882: 826: 209: 160:

Want some help? Maintenance is much easier for me while I'm at school than content creation. If you help me learn to clerk SPI I'll be able to help.

8289: 7830: 7812: 7429: 7410: 7044: 7025: 6966: 6934: 3883: 2879:? I perfer the former as it is less tacky, has more information and is easier to read. The latter is the standard one to use. What do you think? - 7338: 6548: 5839: 5683: 5430: 5196: 3974: 3752: 3672: 3635: 3620: 1244: 8322: 8204: 8174: 6193: 5957: 5866: 5575: 5261: 5217: 4599: 4585: 4534: 4519: 4486: 4471: 4438: 4419: 2257: 2221: 1074: 1062: 1030: 1018: 7856: 6993: 6866: 5917:

discussions relating to RFA. An uninvolved admin may remove any comments in violation of this remedy, and may enforce it with blocks if necessary.

5718: 5589: 5367: 5295: 5186: 5154: 4757: 3555: 3519: 2406: 1525: 8457: 8420: 8397: 8218:

and User:slowking4]], is what I did. Both Editor Retention and New Editor Protection are more important than the feelings of one lone editor. ```

7642:

put off working the one review as this has been a frustrating weekend at enwp, and I didn't want to do a subpar job on the one I'm working on now.

6661: 3423: 3155: 2893: 2758: 2498: 2443:

Agree with Rschen7754. I'm impressed by what you've had to say. I go around sputtering and you've articulated it all quite succinctly. Well done.

2357: 2321: 2282: 2202: 2145: 2127: 2091: 2015: 1144: 829:

because a checkuser was done two days ago. It doesn't seem like that last checkuser was a super in depth one. Should a checkuser be done there?

478: 445: 435: 365: 332: 323: 291: 282: 250: 218: 8254: 5969: 5789: 5774: 5661: 5642: 4692: 2802: 1964: 1165: 1158: 8137: 7800:

going on, plus I need time off. I popped in with my alt just to make the one observation as I didn't want to leave anything important hanging.

6511: 6497: 5881: 4940: 4922: 4242: 1634:

others here. If I and they were to put in the time to form a deep and nuanced understanding of each candidate before voting, we'd be wasting an

8235: 4614: 4549: 4263:

Message added 10:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

4122:

Message added 21:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

3767:

for GA.Will you please review it.I hope you help me as you said "You are willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask." Thank You and kind regards.

1805:

but should already be covered by policy. I tend to not block over it, and instead hat discussion or try to mediate, unless my hand is forced.

1382:

Message added 16:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

6833: 5112: 3987:" which seems to me politcally charged language meant to be unfairly biased against his position with the neutral way I tried to include was " 214:

Dennis, in the absence of a formal mechanism that I know of, I hereby dub you "A clerk". You can take Ryan as a padawan if you want. :-) —

7494: 7309: 5287: 5076: 3980: 1117:

registered users simply by the archives, so that is useful to know. I probably should have deduced that, but hadn't had a reason to before.

2212:

AN/I ! With Arb elections coming up, perhaps it's not only time to get some reforms to RfA, but Arbcom needs a big shake up too.

8468: 5543:

Not sure. I'm not on strike, I'm not protesting, I'm attempting to engage both sides and seek a peaceful resolution, while supporting the

4957: 4950: 1433: 7394: 2228: 525:. swearing, silly things, etc. I would suggest erring on the very conservative side for a bit, making that borderline only because it is 7211: 2558:

You sure were uninvolved enough, and I accept that reducing drama at AN/I is necessary. No argument from me on either of those points. --

7635: 6736: 4364:

Hey, Dennis. Mind giving me your take on this, especially since you deal with double (or multiple/various) accounts all the time? After

2379:

Wow, I just noticed that Floq didn't just template Jclemens, but actually blocked him. Again...wow. She has balls, gotta admire that.

850:

You have two types of CU: A regular CU where they compare two people, and "check for sleepers" where they search the logs to see if any

7153: 1616:

the community. In relation to the admins, "above" is a fair descriptor, but in relation to the rest of the community, they're one with.

120: 8094: 4643:

Laughed my ass off at the "Has anyone seen my paw". I'm sure it's an old one, but it caught me at just the right time I suppose. —

4208: 2645: 592: 515: 130: 8363: 5119:

I've replied at ANI about the issue. You aren't at a stage that you need admin, you need to try to talk it out on the talk page or

4777: 4712: 4345: 4166: 4058: 3713: 7514: 4386: 4315: 605: 116: 5812:

I've semi-protected the regular page for a month, which should slow down some of the action. Let me know if I need to do more.

5396: 1941: 7902: 7884: 5537: 4392:

The key is looking for either overlap or evasion of sanctions/blocks/scrutiny. If they are the same, not sure I see that yet.

3773: 2515: 1428: 8452: 8392: 8284: 8169: 8045: 7969: 7936: 7752: 7664: 7596: 7546: 7489: 7366: 7333: 7272: 7240: 7185: 7115: 7020: 6972: 6929: 6861: 6725: 6640: 6426: 6404:

I agree, and I promise I won't walk away. We need to figure out which is the best solution this coming week and move forward.

6377: 6333: 6250: 6169: 6099: 6050: 6013: 5834: 5570: 5498: 5425: 5362: 5256: 5181: 5149: 5049: 4998: 4917: 4844: 4812: 4740: 4687: 4580: 4514: 4466: 4414: 4237: 4094: 4028: 3957: 3878: 3802: 3747: 3667: 3615: 3550: 3495: 3388: 3365: 3323: 3185: 3095: 3001: 2936: 2866: 2753: 2693: 2630: 2544: 2480: 2401: 2352: 2316: 2252: 2197: 2122: 2067: 1992: 1890: 1827: 1754: 1707: 1594: 1494: 1356: 1309: 1239: 1139: 1057: 1013: 944: 877: 783: 724: 634: 554: 473: 430: 360: 318: 277: 245: 204: 7790: 5457:

gives some info about Autochecked users, but I would personally like to use and see it on my own by experiencing it. Regards.

4870: 4195:

I noticed your comment at the MF clarification request. Requesting clarification of an Arbcom decision has always been risky:

123:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7202:

if there seems nothing to be done, or nothing else to be done. And occasionally I'll archive if it's better off the board. --

7134: 7087: 7073: 6803:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2598: 1798: 1536: 1280: 126: 6645: 6221: 5962:

Appears not, from the look of it, which is somewhat unfortunate, but... I dunno. At least it's clearer than what it was. -—

5084: 2227:

due. Everyone should go give their opinions in the current RfC on the election, particularly the section secret balloting.

7685: 7624: 6574: 6477: 6461: 5939: 2559: 2507: 691: 7844: 5333: 5286:

Besides my edits as Cavann89, I had never edited Turkish page before. Feel free to proceed with any investigation though.

3935:

A little silliness is helpful to keep me from taking myself too serious, something we all fall prey to from time to time.

3195:

That's where the differences lie...some like the gradient, some don't. Leaves me kind confused on what I should do. :S -

3923: 3299: 3060: 2502: 3849: 3831: 3587: 2861: 2779: 2731:

Out of my league. I would say ask Drmies, but he and about a dozen others are on strike. I'm not very active myself.

1210: 1188: 401: 8445: 8385: 8277: 8162: 8038: 7962: 7929: 7745: 7657: 7589: 7539: 7482: 7359: 7326: 7265: 7233: 7178: 7108: 7013: 6922: 6854: 6752: 6718: 6633: 6419: 6370: 6326: 6243: 6162: 6133: 6092: 6043: 6006: 5827: 5563: 5491: 5418: 5355: 5249: 5174: 5142: 5042: 4991: 4910: 4837: 4805: 4733: 4680: 4573: 4507: 4459: 4407: 4230: 4190: 4087: 4021: 3950: 3871: 3795: 3740: 3660: 3608: 3543: 3488: 3358: 3316: 3178: 3088: 2994: 2929: 2746: 2725: 2686: 2623: 2537: 2473: 2394: 2345: 2309: 2245: 2190: 2115: 2060: 1985: 1883: 1820: 1747: 1700: 1587: 1487: 1349: 1302: 1232: 1132: 1050: 1006: 937: 870: 776: 717: 627: 547: 466: 423: 353: 311: 270: 238: 197: 5453:. I already have three other user rights which i do my usual Knowledge work with them. Technical information given at 4197:

here's one where I nearly wound up topic banned from all arts articles because I tried to get clarification on wording

7891: 7379: 6901: 6140: 5680: 5548:

the larger issues. I feel like I'm the only sane person here, which is the first sign of insanity I have been told.

5450: 5159:

Ok, that was an error, i"m at too many places at once. Still, provide some diffs if you are going to make a claim.

5090:

I'm assuming this user may be another sockpuppet, judging by their contributions. It's a repeat of past edits on the

3405:

Seems to me, saying something is 'libel' is much the same as saying something is slanderous and it's not a big deal.

532:

Other examples exist as well. The community has become trigger happy and ham-fisted as of late. It is discouraging.

296:

Ah, you are correct, sir. Thank you. Glad to see you back, I've been looking for you on the back of milk cartons.

175: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 4659: 844: 2434: 2292: 1274:

Just been playing along with him and have got a sore on my index finger on my right hand from flamenco shredding!♦

59: 6560:

The fact that we can't see the material shows that there was a problem; it shouldn't be used to argue that there

8342: 3844: 3641:

article is more important. I know some admin get defiant about reverting out good material, but I don't. While

982: 6488:

contribs would have accumulated, but without further evidence I would hesitate to make a case of sockpuppetry.

8071:

Thank you and certainly no offense intended. I am just pretty confident about this case. Thanks for your time.

7560:

Thanks. I had read that before. I was hoping for a summing-up from your perspective, but don't feel obliged. --

5597: 4305: 1108: 7678:

Thanks! Don't feel any need to rush. I really just appreciate that someone is taking time to look in general.

4369: 4365: 8076: 8014: 7991: 7898: 7880: 7521: 1446: 107:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5472:

I don't think that group does what you think it does. There are only TWO editors with that right as of now.

5403:

We should give the benefit of the doubt when we can. I don't always get it right, but I will keep trying.

4248: 4107: 2785:

That's odd, I can see Mr. Brown's email tab. Perhaps refresh the screen, or close the browser and reload? --

4768: 4265: 4124: 4054: 3996: 3723: 3626:

regardless of source, but no worries, that's why we employ so many eyes, and thanks much for your efforts!

2825: 2656: 2589: 1384: 1250: 494: 591:

Hello again Dennis, Sorry to trouble you again, but could I ask you to look at the above named page. User

388:

Turns out that, between the last time I check fun-l this morning and my knighting you this evening, there

8358: 8185:.{Your adoptee needs advice}.... I assume good faith on the part of Deidra. I also assume poor judgement. 8183:

Thanks for your response. I have sent User Keilana a copy of my message to you with the added thought....

7797: 7447:

have known Prioryman's RL identity -- but I take some pride in not knowing about these stupid feuds...)

7207: 7160: 6671: 6345: 6302: 6272: 5446: 5438: 4855: 4353: 3682: 3431: 3138: 3038: 2876: 8100: 7078: 6947: 3906:

Nice one, Dennis. The funny part about that is that it's true, that would be a reason to block someone.

1367: 1271: 1090: 7611: 7452: 6804: 6790: 6570: 2604:

Good question. I think you may be right, but I really don't know. Would probably need to ask over at

670: 38: 7149: 6950: 6777: 6764: 6077:

Well, at the last clarification request, they just tightened the noose, with yet more vague wording.

5593: 5509: 5373: 4760:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (It's the Fjozk discussion).

4708: 4320: 4273: 4132: 2833: 1392: 653: 601: 488: 4718:

That had a lot of controversy, give me a bit to look at it again, I've been kind of swamped today.

3011:

This is true, but I am different. :) I go against the norm and against the grain. Things like the

8112: 8072: 8010: 7987: 7894: 7876: 7692: 7631: 7139: 5462: 5027:

understand. And that is why I didn't just say "Where is the abuse?" and explained it instead. ;)

5017: 4966: 3443: 2823:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1663: 1558:

the success of the organization, due to being disconnected from all administrative decision making.

7126: 7064: 5510: 498: 6465: 5454: 5008:

Thanks for the compliment. I believe you are right Dennis, it can be freely closed as the actual

4761: 4050: 3992: 3914: 3051: 2649: 2582: 2448: 2417: 2169: 2161:

Malleus has never been a Wikipedian, no matter how many otherwise constructive edits he has made.

1863: 1510: 1461: 6618:

in a timely manner, I would ask you check with another admin until Monday or Tuesday. Thanks!

6524:

You posted in the section about the interaction ban, but your text seems to about the site-ban.

5746:

down for SPI and a revdel on the subsection Rudman? Thanks in advance. There be games afield!

5690:

I feel like I'm the only sane person here, which is the first sign of insanity I have been told'

5473: 8440: 8380: 8272: 8157: 8033: 7957: 7924: 7805: 7740: 7708: 7652: 7584: 7565: 7534: 7510: 7499: 7477: 7406: 7354: 7321: 7260: 7228: 7203: 7173: 7103: 7008: 6917: 6849: 6813: 6713: 6667: 6628: 6599: 6544: 6414: 6365: 6341: 6321: 6298: 6268: 6238: 6207: 6157: 6087: 6038: 6001: 5822: 5558: 5486: 5413: 5350: 5317: 5244: 5169: 5137: 5064: 5037: 4986: 4905: 4832: 4800: 4728: 4675: 4568: 4502: 4454: 4402: 4225: 4082: 4016: 3945: 3897: 3866: 3790: 3735: 3655: 3603: 3538: 3483: 3419: 3353: 3311: 3248: 3233: 3203: 3173: 3149: 3114: 3083: 3024: 2989: 2967: 2924: 2887: 2741: 2681: 2618: 2532: 2468: 2389: 2340: 2304: 2240: 2185: 2110: 2055: 1980: 1925: 1878: 1854: 1815: 1794: 1742: 1722: 1695: 1582: 1554: 1532: 1482: 1344: 1297: 1227: 1127: 1045: 1001: 932: 865: 803: 771: 747: 712: 686: 622: 573: 542: 510: 461: 418: 348: 306: 265: 233: 192: 47: 17: 8107:

and provide assistance. Any other Administrative Page stalkers are invited. An inexperienced

6745: 7769: 7448: 7129: 7082: 7068: 6757: 6566: 6395: 6287: 6217: 5677: 4698: 4374: 4340: 3758: 1958:-- you'll see what I mean if you look at the last couple posts. I'm going real life tonight. 1275: 383: 7030:

I'm so offended. Seriously though, no pressure, no rush, oh, and good luck with that storm.

6794: 223:

You need to grant the same to Berean Hunter, whom I will freely admit is a superior clerk.

8104: 7289: 7145: 6067: 5950: 5311: 4704: 4181: 4159: 4046: 2431: 2029: 1960: 899: 837: 649: 597: 168: 4039:

Thanks man for taking the time to check it out, also our paths did cross once before here

1849:

is a universally-recognised logical fallacy; it is inappropriate on article talk pages. --

8: 8250: 7852: 7826: 7786: 7680: 7619: 7425: 7390: 7038: 6987: 6960: 6895: 6455: 5926: 5655: 5636: 5458: 5013: 4962: 4887: 3840: 3438: 1764:

You may be changing my mind. I'll keep you informed. I've a bit on my mind at the moment.

586: 8408: 8147:

seems to have adopted them, according to their talk page. You might try pinging her.

7775: 7467:

as it is already at two venues yet that isn't on the table as a remedy at either. Yet.

7297: 7058: 6800: 6529: 6507: 6473: 5877: 5802: 5785: 5770: 5751: 5668: 5392: 4751: 4308: 3985:

he believes abortion should be banned with no exceptions, including for victims of rape

3907: 3709: 3631: 3583: 3044: 2857: 2795: 2775: 2708: 2605: 2493: 2444: 2413: 2268: 1506: 1457: 1421: 1266: 1257: 1206: 1184: 7873: 6943:

Ha! That sounds like a good idea. In that case, the pages you'll want to look at are:

2807:

That didn't work, but I found a link somewhere that got me to the email a user screen.

1841:

I'm proposing a change in practice. That is, presently, it is not permitted to remove

8431: 8371: 8314: 8263: 8227: 8215: 8196: 8148: 8129: 8024: 7948: 7915: 7801: 7731: 7703: 7643: 7575: 7561: 7525: 7506: 7468: 7402: 7345: 7312: 7251: 7219: 7164: 7094: 6999: 6908: 6840: 6704: 6686: 6619: 6595: 6540: 6493: 6405: 6356: 6312: 6229: 6201: 6189: 6148: 6078: 6029: 5992: 5858: 5813: 5710: 5615: 5585: 5549: 5529: 5477: 5404: 5341: 5321: 5235: 5211: 5160: 5128: 5106: 5028: 4977: 4896: 4823: 4791: 4719: 4666: 4610: 4595: 4559: 4545: 4530: 4493: 4482: 4445: 4434: 4393: 4382: 4358: 4216: 4073: 4007: 3936: 3893: 3857: 3781: 3726: 3646: 3594: 3529: 3474: 3415: 3344: 3302: 3244: 3229: 3197: 3164: 3143: 3108: 3074: 3018: 2980: 2961: 2951: 2915: 2881: 2732: 2672: 2609: 2523: 2459: 2380: 2331: 2295: 2231: 2217: 2176: 2101: 2046: 1971: 1921: 1869: 1850: 1806: 1790: 1733: 1718: 1686: 1659: 1573: 1528: 1519: 1473: 1335: 1288: 1218: 1118: 1068: 1036: 1024: 992: 976: 923: 856: 795: 762: 739: 703: 678: 613: 565: 533: 502: 497:- I don't think reverting of vandal alterations such as this would be a violation of 452: 409: 339: 297: 256: 224: 183: 146: 137:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

6971:

I just got to thinking...it's a pretty big page to debug, so maybe this might help:

1954:

And the sharks are circling. If you're online tonight, please keep a tight watch on

6829: 6609: 6389: 6283: 6211: 5966: 5674: 5331: 5291: 5080: 4891: 4638: 4336: 3813: 3768: 3569: 3515: 2764: 1152: 2136:

Anything you can do to help in that regard would be appreciated, at least by me.--

8416: 8349: 7163:. She would just open it herself anyway, she is an CU, which outranks a clerk. 6787:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 6657: 6123: 6062: 5943: 5762: 5195:

It's been going on for years now, the history of the article shows all. Plus see

4177: 4152: 3989:

he believes abortion should be banned with no exceptions, including cases of rape

3826: 3704:

Thanks for everything you do to keep the wikipedia running, relevant and useful!

3470: 3043:

I agree that the second one is much more informative at a glance than the first.

2721: 2428: 2278: 2141: 2087: 2022: 2011: 892: 830: 665: 161: 7284:

Re: I'm always willing to try "annoying" before I try "aggressive" as a solution

3456:

was made with the sole purpose of damaging a person's reputation. It is also a

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8246: 8210: 8023:

You are always welcome to get a second opinion, and no offense will be taken.

7848: 7822: 7782: 7421: 7386: 7033: 6982: 6955: 6890: 5982: 5922: 5650: 5631: 5628:

Seeing that as a redlink makes me want to change my username this very minute.

5517: 5320:, likely because you're smarter than I am. Atm I am engaged in an edit war on 5091: 5065: 5009: 4784: 4652: 3836: 3691: 3642: 3461: 3341: 3012: 2872: 648:

Dennis, Many thanks for your help. We'll see how it goes. Best regards, David.

1332: 1329: 1323: 1320: 8242: 7866: 7293: 6525: 6503: 6485: 6469: 6116: 6025: 5987: 5873: 5798: 5781: 5766: 5747: 5388: 5120: 4936: 4866: 4555: 4373:

thus far, has not been editing since the 16th and since this may have been a

4293: 4204: 3764: 3705: 3627: 3579: 3465: 2853: 2788: 2771: 2155: 1955: 1946: 1549: 1545: 1442: 1414: 1253: 1202: 1193:

Not AOL. Most likely Vodafone mobile broadband or a similar UK service, e.g.

1180: 855:

unblock an official CU block (marked as CU block), or I risk losing the bit.

6976: 4006:

I've checked the sources and have added to the talk page as a 3rd opinion.

1249:

Hackneyhond edited from 212.183.128.72 for instance, which is a Vodafone IP

8306: 8219: 8188: 8144: 8121: 6874: 6682: 6666:

Go. Chop wood, or whatever. Place will still be here when you come back. --

6489: 6185: 5850: 5702: 5607: 5521: 5200: 5095: 5072: 4606: 4591: 4541: 4526: 4478: 4430: 4378: 4283: 4142: 3296: 2843: 2327: 2213: 1402: 1198: 1071: 1027: 979: 142: 138: 5742:

Dennis, could you please take a look at the above (edits this month, from

493:

Hi Dennis - I was wanting to revert this clear vandal edit - its a BLP -

6825: 6554: 5963: 5326: 4822:

Out of pocket for a while, will see if I can get back to this in a bit.

4354: 3511: 2947: 2575: 155: 5127:

talking about socks isn't proper without substantiation, ie: evidence.

2900:

When you are asking me for content opinions, this can only mean you are

1451:

Knowledge:Featured article review/Microsoft Security Essentials/archive1

8412: 8353: 6772: 6653: 5697: 5234:

I understand, I have at least a dozen windows open and searching now.

2955: 2717: 2709: 2326:

Now SilverSeren is arguing that Jclemens was "right" in the comment at

2274: 2137: 2083: 2007: 1105: 820: 521:

I think the key would be to make sure it fits the narrow definition of

442: 398: 329: 288: 215: 3983:

were an editor trying to describe Smith's Position on Rape says that "

3473:

phrases or words is unhelpful and should be avoided and/or corrected.

7250:

Ah, I see they already have and blocked, and it is already archived.

4647: 1100:

to be done are pretty much the same in either case; it's mostly just

959:

There seem to be a few misunderstandings here. Let me clear them up.

6944: 4329: 7093:

Hoping to give a listen later today. Actually busy for a change.

6975:

the difference between my code and the "official" MediaWiki gadget

5903:

of 9-1, the Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:

5378: 4932: 4862: 4200: 3722:

Thank you for the kindness! I've safely stored the original in my

3574:

Hi Dennis. I just wanted to let you know I reverted your revert to

612:

start a dialog, or for them to "get it". If it continues, ping me.

108: 5647:

Nevermind. It's already registered. All the good names are taken.

4335:

I'm giving out cookies to all of the Admins I see today :3 Enjoy!

3243:

BTW, why is there a picture of Dan Fogelberg on your user page?:)

564:

Yes - Right. Very best wishes in your real life. Thanks Dennis. -

3575: 2426:

I thought your comments regarding Jclemens' vote were spot on. --

736:

Knowledge:Administrators_noticeboard#NOINDEX-ing_of_evidence_page

6817: 4260:

Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!

4119:

Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!

4072:

Ah, well my poor memory insured a neutral reply nonetheless :)

2820:

Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!

1379:

Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!

4176:

I took your advice, so please check AN under the above title.

761:

make sense, but that doesn't mean Wikipedians will do it ;)

6769:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 5516:

This "administrative strike thing" reminds me of the novel,

5012:

policy is not being violated. Thanks again for your review.

1175:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5696:. It is just down the hall, third door on the left side. A 1868:

redacting obviously rude and unrelated comments that way.

6785:

Template:Did you know nominations/Knight's Spider Web Farm

4665:

A skeleton walks into a bar and orders a beer and a mop.

3892:

Thank you, any bit of fun and joy deeply appreciated ;) --

2522:

that I was uninvolved enough to make that determination.

1194: 112: 7199:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Leontopodium alpinum

5894:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement

5738:

Talk:Highland Park High School (Highland Park, Illinois)

1845:

on article talk pages. I would like it to be mandatory.

6297:

that there are some serious conduct issues in there. --

5520:. Which makes me wonder...which one of you is Galt? ``` 3645:

is a good idea, the quality of the article trumps it.

1912:

I don't think it has to wait for an uninvolved editor:

1789:

if you have the time. It's possibly the wrong venue. --

1785:

on article talk pages. I'd appreciate your thoughts on

111:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 6998:

Still haven't tried it yet. I've been so dang busy.

2158:

for helping start the latest uproar with his comment "

7909:

time consuming method when you are trying to connect

6206:

I was wondering if there was any news with regard to

5991:

battle, and I hope to not be named as a party again.

3141:

with the new climate chart box. What do you think? -

6783:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

1171:

Message added 10:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC). You can

3398:, would that user likely become banned as making a 1287:youth ;-) Hard to describe the emotion it evokes. 4558:account would be warranted if you are confident. 827:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000 5197:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ledenierhomme 2330:. This is the issue that just keeps on giving. 8209:Just to wrap this in a bow and put it to bed... 7063:If you want a cool album to listen to check out 3464:and can result in sanction. This is covered by 1319:Just in the mood for some stuff from childhood. 757:Well, then we both may learn something new. It 5094:article. I refuse to be dragged into edit wars. 4758:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1166:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole 1164:Hello, Dennis Brown. You have new messages at 103:Disambiguation link notification for October 20 5906:Remedy 4 ("Malleus Fatuorum topic banned") of 5316:For some reason you've decided to stay out of 5125:The other editor has been here a few years, so 4172:Your reverting of 'socks/trolls' using Twinkle 971:some of the data does not need to be examined. 6520:It looks like you posted in the wrong section 5912:is vacated, and replaced with the following: 1717:I'll think about what you've said. Thanks. -- 1524:I responded to your comment at the Signpost. 7774:John was involved when he made the block of 6883:importScript('User:Adjwilley/cactions.js'); 4958:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/DeeJermo 4951:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/DeeJermo 4861:permission, I'd be happy to oblige. Thanks, 2871:Which of these climate charts look better? 1652:other editors here. Do you really think the 1179:New socks were added to the investigation. 5765:writes with exactly the same style. Quack. 6460:Sorry to bother you, but an obvious sock ( 4756:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 4554:I'm at work and a bit tied, but filing an 3377:The following discussion has been closed. 6761:was updated with a fact from the article 6464:) currently performing mass deletions on 5940:User talk:Ryan Vesey/Archive 11#Well said 3975:Opinion requested from John D. Rockerduck 1449:, you might be willing to participate in 673:- User has reverted my noindexing of his 7292:, editing here since 2005, but no more. 7067:. Last track isn't the best though... ♦ 1945: 5761:The IP's all WHOIS to Stanford and the 3411:Appreciate if you could clear this up, 14: 3812:I will be very happy,if you review it. 1950:What the situation visually looks like 1732:appreciate your methods in doing so. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7288:Wanna practice that on another user? 3979:I was wondering if you could look at 1331:, followed by Freddie Mercury's last 7524:until he removed me as his mentor. 6740: 6462:Special:Contributions/76.232.253.147 4264: 4123: 2959:"best-of-both-worlds" kinda deal. - 2824: 1434:FAR of Microsoft Security Essentials 1383: 1325:. Then I had to play Annie Lennox, 825:I requested CU then undid myself at 25: 7128:, great version of Come Together.♦ 5449:user right for testing on pages in 23: 5445:Hello Dennis, I would like to use 5377: 4253: 4112: 3219:"It appears I have little support" 2813: 1372: 1157: 24: 8486: 8095:Something requires your attention 7821:Cheers for the reply, good luck. 6141:Knowledge:Request for permissions 5921:For the Arbitration Committee, -- 5451:Knowledge:Pending changes/Testing 2608:, then tell me so we both know. 6744: 6737:DYK for Knight's Spider Web Farm 6590:the objective and fair way, for 4877: 4783: 4328: 3981:Political positions of Tom Smith 3690: 29: 8296:I think it's time for me to go 8101:User talk:SarahStierch#Adoption 6820:) 16:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 6771:... that painted and lacquered 1942:Blood in the wiki-water tonight 1441:As a party involved in the 2nd 5592:? It would seem not... yet... 3389:Libel as a synonym for slander 2867:Need Your Opinion on Something 13: 1: 7701:I'd be interested too, fwiw. 7522:User talk:Youreallycan/YRC2.0 5892:Arbitration motion regarding 1447:Microsoft Security Essentials 8458:21:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 8421:12:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 8398:11:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 8364:02:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 8323:15:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 8290:21:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 8255:21:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 8236:06:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 8205:13:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 8175:13:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 8138:05:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 8081:02:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 8051:22:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 8019:21:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7996:21:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7975:21:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7942:20:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7903:19:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 7885:20:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 7857:18:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7831:13:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 7813:12:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 7791:12:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 7758:23:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7715:04:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 7697:23:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 7670:01:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 7636:01:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 7602:12:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7570:12:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7552:11:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7515:08:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7495:11:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7457:09:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7430:08:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7411:08:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7395:07:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7372:00:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 7339:23:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7302:23:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7278:14:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7246:14:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7218:else doesn't beat me to it. 7212:12:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7191:01:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7154:01:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7135:21:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7121:14:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7088:12:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7074:20:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 7045:21:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 7026:21:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 6994:00:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6967:21:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 6935:20:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 6902:20:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 6867:01:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 6834:01:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 6731:13:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 6691:02:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6676:00:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6662:00:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6646:00:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6604:12:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 6575:08:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 6549:22:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 6534:22:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 6512:00:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 6498:00:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 6478:22:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6432:00:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6400:00:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6383:00:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6350:00:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6307:23:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6292:23:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6277:22:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6256:22:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6222:22:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6194:02:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 6175:21:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6134:21:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6105:22:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6073:21:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6056:21:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 6019:21:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5970:20:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5958:20:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5931:19:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5882:23:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5867:21:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5840:11:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5807:03:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5790:03:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5775:01:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5756:00:59, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5719:14:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5684:19:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5662:19:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5643:19:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5624:17:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5602:16:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5576:14:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5538:14:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5504:12:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5467:11:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5431:11:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5397:04:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5368:11:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5334:01:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 5296:22:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5262:22:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5218:22:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5187:21:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5155:21:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5113:21:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5085:21:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5055:20:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5022:20:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 5004:20:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4971:19:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4941:20:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4923:19:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4871:18:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4850:17:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4818:16:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4778:16:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4746:19:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4713:11:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4693:13:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4660:03:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4615:15:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4600:18:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 4586:18:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 4550:18:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 4535:22:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4520:18:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4487:16:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4472:16:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4439:15:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4420:15:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4387:10:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 4346:10:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4316:10:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4269:at any time by removing the 4243:12:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4209:05:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4186:01:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4167:21:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 4128:at any time by removing the 4100:12:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4063:23:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 4034:22:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 4001:21:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3963:21:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3931:21:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3902:21:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3884:21:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3850:19:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3819:19:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3808:19:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3774:19:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3753:17:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3714:16:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3673:17:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3636:16:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3621:15:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3588:15:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3556:14:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3520:14:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3501:14:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3449:14:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3424:13:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3371:21:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3329:13:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3253:12:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3238:12:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3210:19:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3191:10:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3156:02:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3121:19:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 3101:19:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 3068:19:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 3031:19:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 3007:19:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2974:18:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2942:17:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2894:17:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2862:04:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2829:at any time by removing the 2803:03:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2780:03:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2759:01:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2726:01:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2699:01:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2666:01:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2636:21:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2599:21:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2568:14:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2550:13:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2516:12:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2486:14:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2453:11:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2439:06:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2422:03:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2407:00:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2358:00:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2322:00:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2283:00:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 2258:23:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2222:23:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2203:23:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2146:23:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2128:22:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2092:22:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2073:22:43, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2037:22:40, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2016:22:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1998:22:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1965:22:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1930:17:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1896:16:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1859:16:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1833:15:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1799:14:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1760:19:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1727:16:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1713:15:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1668:03:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1600:02:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1546:WikiProject Editor Retention 1537:01:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1500:11:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1466:08:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 1429:16:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1388:at any time by removing the 1362:19:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1315:18:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1281:13:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1245:19:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1211:19:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1201:) used by Nole in the past. 1189:10:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1145:21:39, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1109:21:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1075:21:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1063:21:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1031:21:26, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1019:21:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 983:21:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 950:21:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 907:21:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 883:20:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 845:20:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 809:22:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 789:20:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 753:20:55, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 730:20:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 692:20:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 658:16:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 640:16:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 606:15:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 579:13:01, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 560:11:39, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 516:02:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 479:14:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 446:14:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 436:11:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 402:03:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 366:01:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 333:01:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 324:01:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 292:01:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 283:00:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 251:00:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 219:00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 210:00:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 176:00:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 151:12:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 7: 7798:Lexington Barbecue Festival 7197:confirm identity - as with 5447:Knowledge:Autochecked users 5439:Knowledge:Autochecked users 1970:Just got on wiki....jeez... 1550:Request for Admin Sanctions 10: 8491: 4191:Requests for clarification 1548:, tried to get the policy 1217:be cryptic for a reason. 8411:sanctioning the editor.-- 7380:Voluntary interaction ban 7308:discussion at the boards 7159:Elen has explained it on 5983:He Who Shall Not Be Named 5385:Thanks for believing! :) 4605:this topic at this time. 3763:Hi,Dennis.I've nominated 3689: 2905:actually requires you to 8113:User talk:RAIDENRULES123 6799:and it will be added to 6778:Knight's Spider Web Farm 6765:Knight's Spider Web Farm 6602:) (alt of Dennis Brown) 3380:Please do not modify it. 1638:amount of valuable time. 8343:On behalf of Ryan Vesey 6805:Did you know? talk page 5688:@Dennis. Your comment, 5455:Special:ListGroupRights 4949:Nice to see you again, 1195:http://www.three.co.uk/ 5919: 5382: 5071:This is very tedious. 4258: 4117: 2818: 1951: 1629:This will result in a 1377: 1162: 18:User talk:Dennis Brown 8359:What did I break now? 6824:Congrats, Mr. Admin! 5914: 5381: 4257: 4116: 3724:Ronco™ Barnstar Vault 2817: 1949: 1376: 1161: 42:of past discussions. 8105:User talk:Brybry1999 7290:User talk:Bull-Doser 6466:Genocides in history 6147:in a week. Sorry. 5909:Civility Enforcement 5797:NM, he self deleted. 5594:William M. Connolley 3856:creating articles. 3698:The Admin's Barnstar 499:my agreed conditions 255:Oh, and thank you. 139:opt-out instructions 8430:the encyclopedia. 8407:did yesterday, I'm 8109:(fill in the blank) 8073:ProfessionalScholar 8011:ProfessionalScholar 7988:ProfessionalScholar 7895:ProfessionalScholar 7877:ProfessionalScholar 6775:are sold as art at 6026:It is a binary test 4931:Thanks! Will do. -- 4856:Requesting reviewer 3815:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 3770:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 3683:A barnstar for you! 2671:for a week or so. 1272:Some Arabic flavour 121:fix with Dab solver 8303: 7810:(aka Dennis Brown) 7612:Editor/RfA review? 5584:You'll be wanting 5383: 4890:, then patrolling 4342:(Prefect Helpdesk) 4337:Meva / CHCSPrefect 4266:remove this notice 4259: 4125:remove this notice 4118: 4051:John D. Rockerduck 3993:John D. Rockerduck 3845:List of good deeds 3408:I could be wrong, 3139:Stephens City page 2952:User:Gerda Arendt‎ 2946:Nah, I have asked 2826:remove this notice 2819: 2006:It isn't pretty.-- 1952: 1385:remove this notice 1378: 1173:remove this notice 1163: 129:• Join us at the 8456: 8448: 8443: 8396: 8388: 8383: 8362: 8321: 8301: 8288: 8280: 8275: 8234: 8203: 8173: 8165: 8160: 8136: 8117:What can be done? 8049: 8041: 8036: 7973: 7965: 7960: 7940: 7932: 7927: 7843:I left a comment 7811: 7756: 7748: 7743: 7668: 7660: 7655: 7600: 7592: 7587: 7550: 7542: 7537: 7493: 7485: 7480: 7370: 7362: 7357: 7337: 7329: 7324: 7276: 7268: 7263: 7244: 7236: 7231: 7204:Elen of the Roads 7189: 7181: 7176: 7119: 7111: 7106: 7042: 7024: 7016: 7011: 6991: 6964: 6933: 6925: 6920: 6899: 6865: 6857: 6852: 6811: 6810: 6798: 6729: 6721: 6716: 6668:Elen of the Roads 6644: 6636: 6631: 6430: 6422: 6417: 6381: 6373: 6368: 6342:Elen of the Roads 6337: 6329: 6324: 6299:Elen of the Roads 6269:Elen of the Roads 6254: 6246: 6241: 6173: 6165: 6160: 6103: 6095: 6090: 6054: 6046: 6041: 6017: 6009: 6004: 5865: 5838: 5830: 5825: 5717: 5672: 5659: 5640: 5622: 5588:then. Do we have 5586:User:Balph Eubank 5574: 5566: 5561: 5536: 5511:Who is John Galt? 5502: 5494: 5489: 5429: 5421: 5416: 5374:A kitten for you! 5366: 5358: 5353: 5322:User:Sally Season 5260: 5252: 5247: 5185: 5177: 5172: 5153: 5145: 5140: 5053: 5045: 5040: 5002: 4994: 4989: 4921: 4913: 4908: 4848: 4840: 4835: 4816: 4808: 4803: 4744: 4736: 4731: 4691: 4683: 4678: 4658: 4584: 4576: 4571: 4518: 4510: 4505: 4470: 4462: 4457: 4418: 4410: 4405: 4366:reverting Rogr101 4351: 4350: 4343: 4321:A cookie for you! 4241: 4233: 4228: 4098: 4090: 4085: 4066: 4049:comment added by 4032: 4024: 4019: 3961: 3953: 3948: 3882: 3874: 3869: 3806: 3798: 3793: 3751: 3743: 3738: 3719: 3718: 3671: 3663: 3658: 3619: 3611: 3606: 3567: 3566: 3554: 3546: 3541: 3499: 3491: 3486: 3432:talk page stalker 3369: 3361: 3356: 3327: 3319: 3314: 3212: 3189: 3181: 3176: 3158: 3123: 3099: 3091: 3086: 3039:talk page stalker 3033: 3005: 2997: 2992: 2976: 2940: 2932: 2927: 2896: 2801: 2757: 2749: 2744: 2697: 2689: 2684: 2634: 2626: 2621: 2548: 2540: 2535: 2484: 2476: 2471: 2405: 2397: 2392: 2356: 2348: 2343: 2320: 2312: 2307: 2294:. Exceptional. 2272: 2256: 2248: 2243: 2201: 2193: 2188: 2173:persona non grata 2154:In part, I blame 2126: 2118: 2113: 2071: 2063: 2058: 1996: 1988: 1983: 1963: 1894: 1886: 1881: 1831: 1823: 1818: 1758: 1750: 1745: 1711: 1703: 1698: 1598: 1590: 1585: 1498: 1490: 1485: 1427: 1360: 1352: 1347: 1313: 1305: 1300: 1243: 1235: 1230: 1143: 1135: 1130: 1061: 1053: 1048: 1017: 1009: 1004: 948: 940: 935: 881: 873: 868: 787: 779: 774: 728: 720: 715: 638: 630: 625: 558: 550: 545: 523:obvious vandalism 489:vandal reverting? 477: 469: 464: 434: 426: 421: 364: 356: 351: 322: 314: 309: 281: 273: 268: 249: 241: 236: 208: 200: 195: 134: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 8482: 8450: 8446: 8441: 8390: 8386: 8381: 8356: 8313: 8282: 8278: 8273: 8226: 8211:Editor Cindamuse 8195: 8167: 8163: 8158: 8128: 8043: 8039: 8034: 7967: 7963: 7958: 7934: 7930: 7925: 7809: 7750: 7746: 7741: 7713: 7711: 7706: 7688: 7683: 7662: 7658: 7653: 7627: 7622: 7594: 7590: 7585: 7544: 7540: 7535: 7487: 7483: 7478: 7449:Nomoskedasticity 7364: 7360: 7355: 7331: 7327: 7322: 7270: 7266: 7261: 7238: 7234: 7229: 7183: 7179: 7174: 7140:SPI on Logical 1 7132: 7113: 7109: 7104: 7085: 7071: 7043: 7036: 7018: 7014: 7009: 6992: 6985: 6965: 6958: 6927: 6923: 6918: 6900: 6893: 6859: 6855: 6850: 6788: 6748: 6741: 6723: 6719: 6714: 6638: 6634: 6629: 6567:Nomoskedasticity 6424: 6420: 6415: 6392: 6375: 6371: 6366: 6331: 6327: 6322: 6248: 6244: 6239: 6214: 6167: 6163: 6158: 6131: 6097: 6093: 6088: 6070: 6065: 6048: 6044: 6039: 6011: 6007: 6002: 5857: 5832: 5828: 5823: 5709: 5666: 5660: 5653: 5641: 5634: 5614: 5568: 5564: 5559: 5528: 5496: 5492: 5487: 5423: 5419: 5414: 5360: 5356: 5351: 5329: 5254: 5250: 5245: 5214: 5208: 5204: 5179: 5175: 5170: 5147: 5143: 5138: 5109: 5103: 5099: 5047: 5043: 5038: 4996: 4992: 4987: 4915: 4911: 4906: 4885: 4881: 4880: 4842: 4838: 4833: 4810: 4806: 4801: 4787: 4775: 4766: 4738: 4734: 4729: 4685: 4681: 4676: 4657: 4655: 4644: 4578: 4574: 4569: 4512: 4508: 4503: 4464: 4460: 4455: 4412: 4408: 4403: 4341: 4332: 4325: 4324: 4312: 4303: 4298: 4290: 4288: 4282: 4278: 4272: 4268: 4256: 4249:You've got mail! 4235: 4231: 4226: 4149: 4147: 4141: 4137: 4131: 4127: 4115: 4108:You've got mail! 4092: 4088: 4083: 4065: 4043: 4026: 4022: 4017: 3955: 3951: 3946: 3928: 3921: 3912: 3876: 3872: 3867: 3848: 3847: 3816: 3800: 3796: 3791: 3771: 3745: 3741: 3736: 3694: 3687: 3686: 3665: 3661: 3656: 3613: 3609: 3604: 3548: 3544: 3539: 3493: 3489: 3484: 3446: 3441: 3435: 3382: 3363: 3359: 3354: 3338: 3337: 3321: 3317: 3312: 3206: 3200: 3196: 3183: 3179: 3174: 3152: 3146: 3142: 3117: 3111: 3107: 3093: 3089: 3084: 3065: 3058: 3049: 3042: 3027: 3021: 3017: 2999: 2995: 2990: 2970: 2964: 2960: 2934: 2930: 2925: 2902:really desperate 2890: 2884: 2880: 2850: 2848: 2842: 2838: 2832: 2828: 2816: 2798: 2792: 2786: 2751: 2747: 2742: 2691: 2687: 2682: 2663: 2654: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2596: 2587: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2478: 2474: 2469: 2399: 2395: 2390: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2266: 2250: 2246: 2241: 2195: 2191: 2186: 2120: 2116: 2111: 2065: 2061: 2056: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1959: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1864:WP:REMOVEUNCIVIL 1825: 1821: 1816: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1705: 1701: 1696: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1424: 1418: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1401: 1397: 1391: 1387: 1375: 1368:You've got mail! 1354: 1350: 1345: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1278: 1237: 1233: 1228: 1176: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1094: 1055: 1051: 1046: 1011: 1007: 1002: 942: 938: 933: 875: 871: 866: 806: 802: 798: 781: 777: 772: 750: 746: 742: 722: 718: 713: 689: 685: 681: 632: 628: 623: 576: 572: 568: 552: 548: 543: 513: 509: 505: 471: 467: 462: 428: 424: 419: 358: 354: 349: 316: 312: 307: 275: 271: 266: 243: 239: 234: 202: 198: 193: 124: 117:check to confirm 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 8490: 8489: 8485: 8484: 8483: 8481: 8480: 8479: 8409:not comfortable 8361: 8350:User:Ryan Vesey 8345: 8097: 7869: 7772: 7709: 7704: 7702: 7686: 7681: 7625: 7620: 7614: 7502: 7382: 7286: 7146:Dominus Vobisdu 7142: 7130: 7083: 7069: 7061: 7031: 6980: 6953: 6888: 6887:see obviously. 6884: 6877: 6814:The DYK project 6753:28 October 2012 6739: 6683:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 6614: 6557: 6522: 6490:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 6458: 6390: 6212: 6208:WP:Conservatism 6204: 6186:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 6124: 6119: 6068: 6063: 5897: 5763:User:Joseacosta 5740: 5648: 5629: 5514: 5443: 5376: 5327: 5314: 5212: 5206: 5202: 5107: 5101: 5097: 5069: 4954: 4878: 4876: 4858: 4769: 4762: 4754: 4705:Darkness Shines 4701: 4653: 4645: 4641: 4362: 4323: 4313: 4310: 4299: 4294: 4291: 4286: 4280: 4276: 4274:You've got mail 4270: 4262: 4254: 4251: 4193: 4174: 4150: 4145: 4139: 4135: 4133:You've got mail 4129: 4121: 4113: 4110: 4044: 3977: 3924: 3915: 3908: 3839: 3835: 3829: 3814: 3769: 3761: 3685: 3572: 3444: 3439: 3429: 3396:false and libel 3391: 3378: 3221: 3204: 3198: 3150: 3144: 3115: 3109: 3061: 3052: 3045: 3036: 3025: 3019: 2968: 2962: 2888: 2882: 2869: 2851: 2846: 2840: 2836: 2834:You've got mail 2830: 2822: 2814: 2796: 2790: 2767: 2713: 2657: 2650: 2590: 2583: 2578: 2496: 2214:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1944: 1522: 1436: 1422: 1416: 1410: 1405: 1399: 1395: 1393:You've got mail 1389: 1381: 1373: 1370: 1276: 1269: 1177: 1170: 1155: 1088: 823: 804: 800: 796: 748: 744: 740: 698:not sure I can 687: 683: 679: 668: 650:David J Johnson 598:David J Johnson 589: 574: 570: 566: 511: 507: 503: 491: 386: 158: 131:DPL WikiProject 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 8488: 8478: 8477: 8476: 8475: 8474: 8473: 8472: 8471: 8461: 8460: 8424: 8423: 8401: 8400: 8357: 8344: 8341: 8340: 8339: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8335: 8334: 8333: 8332: 8331: 8330: 8329: 8328: 8327: 8326: 8325: 8318: 8310: 8231: 8223: 8200: 8192: 8178: 8177: 8133: 8125: 8096: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8090: 8089: 8088: 8087: 8086: 8085: 8084: 8083: 8060: 8059: 8058: 8057: 8056: 8055: 8054: 8053: 8001: 8000: 7999: 7998: 7980: 7979: 7978: 7977: 7868: 7865: 7864: 7863: 7862: 7861: 7860: 7859: 7836: 7835: 7834: 7833: 7816: 7815: 7771: 7768: 7767: 7766: 7765: 7764: 7763: 7762: 7761: 7760: 7720: 7719: 7718: 7717: 7699: 7673: 7672: 7613: 7610: 7609: 7608: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7604: 7555: 7554: 7501: 7500:YRC mentorship 7498: 7464: 7463: 7462: 7461: 7460: 7459: 7435: 7434: 7433: 7432: 7414: 7413: 7381: 7378: 7377: 7376: 7375: 7374: 7285: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7248: 7194: 7193: 7141: 7138: 7124: 7123: 7060: 7057: 7056: 7055: 7054: 7053: 7052: 7051: 7050: 7049: 7048: 7047: 6938: 6937: 6882: 6876: 6873: 6872: 6871: 6870: 6869: 6809: 6808: 6749: 6738: 6735: 6734: 6733: 6698: 6696: 6695: 6694: 6693: 6664: 6613: 6608: 6607: 6606: 6556: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6521: 6518: 6517: 6516: 6515: 6514: 6457: 6454: 6453: 6452: 6451: 6450: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6444: 6443: 6442: 6441: 6440: 6439: 6438: 6437: 6436: 6435: 6434: 6259: 6258: 6203: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6178: 6177: 6118: 6115: 6114: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6107: 6021: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5934: 5896: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5884: 5862: 5854: 5843: 5842: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5739: 5736: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5714: 5706: 5694:The Foundation 5645: 5619: 5611: 5590:User:John Galt 5579: 5578: 5533: 5525: 5518:Atlas Shrugged 5513: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5459:TheGeneralUser 5442: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5399: 5375: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5313: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5223: 5222: 5221: 5220: 5190: 5189: 5157: 5116: 5115: 5092:Turkish people 5068: 5066:Turkish people 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5014:TheGeneralUser 4963:TheGeneralUser 4953: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4926: 4925: 4857: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4820: 4753: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4700: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4640: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4423: 4422: 4375:WP:Fresh start 4361: 4352: 4349: 4348: 4333: 4322: 4319: 4309: 4261: 4252: 4250: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4192: 4189: 4173: 4170: 4120: 4111: 4109: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4037: 4036: 3976: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3887: 3886: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3760: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3717: 3716: 3701: 3700: 3695: 3684: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3571: 3568: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3523: 3522: 3504: 3503: 3460:assumption of 3452: 3451: 3390: 3387: 3384: 3383: 3374: 3373: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3256: 3255: 3223:It appears to 3220: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3070: 3013:Ottawa version 2868: 2865: 2821: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2716:take a look.-- 2712: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2639: 2638: 2577: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2560:195.14.220.127 2553: 2552: 2508:195.14.220.127 2495: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2441: 2424: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2324: 2286: 2285: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2206: 2205: 2149: 2148: 2131: 2130: 2095: 2094: 2076: 2075: 2040: 2039: 2018: 2001: 2000: 1943: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1836: 1835: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1570:if they choose 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1456:Best regards, 1438:Hello, Dennis 1435: 1432: 1380: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1317: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1169: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 973: 972: 968: 964: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 886: 885: 822: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 667: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 643: 642: 588: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 490: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 385: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 253: 157: 154: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 8487: 8470: 8465: 8464: 8463: 8462: 8459: 8455: 8454: 8449: 8444: 8438: 8437: 8434: 8428: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8422: 8418: 8414: 8410: 8405: 8404: 8403: 8402: 8399: 8395: 8394: 8389: 8384: 8378: 8377: 8374: 8368: 8367: 8366: 8365: 8360: 8355: 8351: 8324: 8320: 8319: 8316: 8312: 8311: 8308: 8299: 8295: 8294: 8293: 8292: 8291: 8287: 8286: 8281: 8276: 8270: 8269: 8266: 8260: 8259: 8258: 8257: 8256: 8252: 8248: 8244: 8243:false witness 8239: 8238: 8237: 8233: 8232: 8229: 8225: 8224: 8221: 8217: 8212: 8208: 8207: 8206: 8202: 8201: 8198: 8194: 8193: 8190: 8186: 8182: 8181: 8180: 8179: 8176: 8172: 8171: 8166: 8161: 8155: 8154: 8151: 8146: 8142: 8141: 8140: 8139: 8135: 8134: 8131: 8127: 8126: 8123: 8118: 8114: 8110: 8106: 8102: 8082: 8078: 8074: 8070: 8069: 8068: 8067: 8066: 8065: 8064: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8052: 8048: 8047: 8042: 8037: 8031: 8030: 8027: 8022: 8021: 8020: 8016: 8012: 8007: 8006: 8005: 8004: 8003: 8002: 7997: 7993: 7989: 7984: 7983: 7982: 7981: 7976: 7972: 7971: 7966: 7961: 7955: 7954: 7951: 7945: 7944: 7943: 7939: 7938: 7933: 7928: 7922: 7921: 7918: 7912: 7907: 7906: 7905: 7904: 7900: 7896: 7892: 7887: 7886: 7882: 7878: 7874: 7858: 7854: 7850: 7846: 7842: 7841: 7840: 7839: 7838: 7837: 7832: 7828: 7824: 7820: 7819: 7818: 7817: 7814: 7807: 7803: 7799: 7795: 7794: 7793: 7792: 7788: 7784: 7780: 7777: 7776:Boundarylayer 7770:Boundarylayer 7759: 7755: 7754: 7749: 7744: 7738: 7737: 7734: 7728: 7727: 7726: 7725: 7724: 7723: 7722: 7721: 7716: 7712: 7707: 7700: 7698: 7694: 7690: 7689: 7684: 7677: 7676: 7675: 7674: 7671: 7667: 7666: 7661: 7656: 7650: 7649: 7646: 7640: 7639: 7638: 7637: 7633: 7629: 7628: 7623: 7603: 7599: 7598: 7593: 7588: 7582: 7581: 7578: 7573: 7572: 7571: 7567: 7563: 7559: 7558: 7557: 7556: 7553: 7549: 7548: 7543: 7538: 7532: 7531: 7528: 7523: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7516: 7512: 7508: 7497: 7496: 7492: 7491: 7486: 7481: 7475: 7474: 7471: 7458: 7454: 7450: 7446: 7441: 7440: 7439: 7438: 7437: 7436: 7431: 7427: 7423: 7418: 7417: 7416: 7415: 7412: 7408: 7404: 7399: 7398: 7397: 7396: 7392: 7388: 7373: 7369: 7368: 7363: 7358: 7352: 7351: 7348: 7342: 7341: 7340: 7336: 7335: 7330: 7325: 7319: 7318: 7315: 7310: 7306: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7299: 7295: 7291: 7279: 7275: 7274: 7269: 7264: 7258: 7257: 7254: 7249: 7247: 7243: 7242: 7237: 7232: 7226: 7225: 7222: 7216: 7215: 7214: 7213: 7209: 7205: 7200: 7192: 7188: 7187: 7182: 7177: 7171: 7170: 7167: 7162: 7158: 7157: 7156: 7155: 7151: 7147: 7137: 7136: 7133: 7131:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 7127: 7122: 7118: 7117: 7112: 7107: 7101: 7100: 7097: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7086: 7084:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 7080: 7076: 7075: 7072: 7070:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 7066: 7046: 7040: 7035: 7029: 7028: 7027: 7023: 7022: 7017: 7012: 7006: 7005: 7002: 6997: 6996: 6995: 6989: 6984: 6978: 6974: 6970: 6969: 6968: 6962: 6957: 6951: 6948: 6945: 6942: 6941: 6940: 6939: 6936: 6932: 6931: 6926: 6921: 6915: 6914: 6911: 6906: 6905: 6904: 6903: 6897: 6892: 6881: 6868: 6864: 6863: 6858: 6853: 6847: 6846: 6843: 6837: 6836: 6835: 6831: 6827: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6819: 6815: 6806: 6802: 6796: 6792: 6786: 6782: 6780: 6779: 6774: 6768: 6767: 6766: 6760: 6759: 6758:Did you know? 6754: 6750: 6747: 6743: 6742: 6732: 6728: 6727: 6722: 6717: 6711: 6710: 6707: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6692: 6688: 6684: 6679: 6678: 6677: 6673: 6669: 6665: 6663: 6659: 6655: 6651: 6650: 6649: 6648: 6647: 6643: 6642: 6637: 6632: 6626: 6625: 6622: 6612: 6605: 6601: 6597: 6593: 6588: 6584: 6579: 6578: 6577: 6576: 6572: 6568: 6563: 6550: 6546: 6542: 6538: 6537: 6536: 6535: 6531: 6527: 6513: 6509: 6505: 6501: 6500: 6499: 6495: 6491: 6487: 6482: 6481: 6480: 6479: 6475: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6433: 6429: 6428: 6423: 6418: 6412: 6411: 6408: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6397: 6393: 6386: 6385: 6384: 6380: 6379: 6374: 6369: 6363: 6362: 6359: 6353: 6352: 6351: 6347: 6343: 6339: 6338: 6336: 6335: 6330: 6325: 6319: 6318: 6315: 6310: 6309: 6308: 6304: 6300: 6295: 6294: 6293: 6289: 6285: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6274: 6270: 6265: 6264: 6263: 6262: 6261: 6260: 6257: 6253: 6252: 6247: 6242: 6236: 6235: 6232: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6223: 6219: 6215: 6209: 6195: 6191: 6187: 6182: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6176: 6172: 6171: 6166: 6161: 6155: 6154: 6151: 6146: 6142: 6138: 6137: 6136: 6135: 6132: 6130: 6129: 6122:future.Thanx! 6106: 6102: 6101: 6096: 6091: 6085: 6084: 6081: 6076: 6075: 6074: 6071: 6066: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6053: 6052: 6047: 6042: 6036: 6035: 6032: 6027: 6022: 6020: 6016: 6015: 6010: 6005: 5999: 5998: 5995: 5989: 5984: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5971: 5968: 5965: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5942:be outlawed? 5941: 5936: 5935: 5933: 5932: 5928: 5924: 5918: 5913: 5911: 5910: 5904: 5902: 5895: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5864: 5863: 5860: 5856: 5855: 5852: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5844: 5841: 5837: 5836: 5831: 5826: 5820: 5819: 5816: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5808: 5804: 5800: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5759: 5758: 5757: 5753: 5749: 5745: 5735: 5720: 5716: 5715: 5712: 5708: 5707: 5704: 5699: 5695: 5691: 5687: 5686: 5685: 5682: 5679: 5676: 5670: 5669:edit conflict 5665: 5664: 5663: 5657: 5652: 5646: 5644: 5638: 5633: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5621: 5620: 5617: 5613: 5612: 5609: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5577: 5573: 5572: 5567: 5562: 5556: 5555: 5552: 5546: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5535: 5534: 5531: 5527: 5526: 5523: 5519: 5512: 5505: 5501: 5500: 5495: 5490: 5484: 5483: 5480: 5474: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5464: 5460: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5440: 5432: 5428: 5427: 5422: 5417: 5411: 5410: 5407: 5402: 5401: 5400: 5398: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5380: 5369: 5365: 5364: 5359: 5354: 5348: 5347: 5344: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5332: 5330: 5323: 5319: 5297: 5293: 5289: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5263: 5259: 5258: 5253: 5248: 5242: 5241: 5238: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5219: 5215: 5209: 5205: 5198: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5188: 5184: 5183: 5178: 5173: 5167: 5166: 5163: 5158: 5156: 5152: 5151: 5146: 5141: 5135: 5134: 5131: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5117: 5114: 5110: 5104: 5100: 5093: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5067: 5056: 5052: 5051: 5046: 5041: 5035: 5034: 5031: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5001: 5000: 4995: 4990: 4984: 4983: 4980: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4968: 4964: 4959: 4952: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4924: 4920: 4919: 4914: 4909: 4903: 4902: 4899: 4893: 4889: 4884: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4851: 4847: 4846: 4841: 4836: 4830: 4829: 4826: 4821: 4819: 4815: 4814: 4809: 4804: 4798: 4797: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4776: 4774: 4773: 4767: 4765: 4759: 4747: 4743: 4742: 4737: 4732: 4726: 4725: 4722: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4710: 4706: 4699:Marcel Leroux 4694: 4690: 4689: 4684: 4679: 4673: 4672: 4669: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4656: 4650: 4649: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4583: 4582: 4577: 4572: 4566: 4565: 4562: 4557: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4532: 4528: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4517: 4516: 4511: 4506: 4500: 4499: 4496: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4469: 4468: 4463: 4458: 4452: 4451: 4448: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4421: 4417: 4416: 4411: 4406: 4400: 4399: 4396: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4371: 4367: 4360: 4356: 4347: 4344: 4338: 4334: 4331: 4327: 4326: 4318: 4317: 4314: 4306: 4304: 4302: 4297: 4285: 4275: 4267: 4244: 4240: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4223: 4222: 4219: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4169: 4168: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4144: 4134: 4126: 4101: 4097: 4096: 4091: 4086: 4080: 4079: 4076: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4042: 4035: 4031: 4030: 4025: 4020: 4014: 4013: 4010: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3964: 3960: 3959: 3954: 3949: 3943: 3942: 3939: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3929: 3927: 3922: 3920: 3919: 3913: 3911: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3885: 3881: 3880: 3875: 3870: 3864: 3863: 3860: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3833: 3820: 3817: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3805: 3804: 3799: 3794: 3788: 3787: 3784: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3772: 3766: 3765:Uttar Pradesh 3759:Uttar Pradesh 3754: 3750: 3749: 3744: 3739: 3733: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3720: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3702: 3699: 3696: 3693: 3688: 3674: 3670: 3669: 3664: 3659: 3653: 3652: 3649: 3644: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3612: 3607: 3601: 3600: 3597: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3547: 3542: 3536: 3535: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3497: 3492: 3487: 3481: 3480: 3477: 3472: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3447: 3442: 3433: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3412: 3409: 3406: 3403: 3401: 3397: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3376: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3362: 3357: 3351: 3350: 3347: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3330: 3326: 3325: 3320: 3315: 3309: 3308: 3305: 3300: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3267: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3226: 3211: 3207: 3201: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3188: 3187: 3182: 3177: 3171: 3170: 3167: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3157: 3153: 3147: 3140: 3122: 3118: 3112: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3081: 3080: 3077: 3071: 3069: 3066: 3064: 3059: 3057: 3056: 3050: 3048: 3040: 3035: 3034: 3032: 3028: 3022: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3003: 2998: 2993: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2978: 2977: 2975: 2971: 2965: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2922: 2921: 2918: 2913: 2908: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2895: 2891: 2885: 2878: 2874: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2845: 2835: 2827: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2794: 2793: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2760: 2756: 2755: 2750: 2745: 2739: 2738: 2735: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2711: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2690: 2685: 2679: 2678: 2675: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2664: 2662: 2661: 2655: 2653: 2648:your answer. 2647: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2616: 2615: 2612: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2595: 2594: 2588: 2586: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2541: 2536: 2530: 2529: 2526: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2504: 2499: 2487: 2483: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2466: 2465: 2462: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2440: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2425: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2414:Amadscientist 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2404: 2403: 2398: 2393: 2387: 2386: 2383: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2349: 2344: 2338: 2337: 2334: 2329: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2308: 2302: 2301: 2298: 2293: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2270: 2269:edit conflict 2265: 2264: 2259: 2255: 2254: 2249: 2244: 2238: 2237: 2234: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2194: 2189: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2163: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2119: 2114: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2064: 2059: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2019: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1948: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1887: 1882: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1830: 1829: 1824: 1819: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1751: 1746: 1740: 1739: 1736: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1704: 1699: 1693: 1692: 1689: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655:self-selected 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1586: 1580: 1579: 1576: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1512: 1508: 1507:Codename Lisa 1503: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1480: 1479: 1476: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1458:Codename Lisa 1454: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1404: 1394: 1386: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1273: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1174: 1167: 1160: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1092: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1010: 1005: 999: 998: 995: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 981: 978: 969: 965: 962: 961: 960: 951: 947: 946: 941: 936: 930: 929: 926: 920: 915: 910: 909: 908: 905: 904: 903: 898: 897: 896: 890: 889: 888: 887: 884: 880: 879: 874: 869: 863: 862: 859: 853: 849: 848: 847: 846: 843: 842: 841: 836: 835: 834: 828: 810: 807: 799: 792: 791: 790: 786: 785: 780: 775: 769: 768: 765: 760: 756: 755: 754: 751: 743: 737: 733: 732: 731: 727: 726: 721: 716: 710: 709: 706: 701: 696: 695: 694: 693: 690: 682: 676: 672: 659: 655: 651: 647: 646: 645: 644: 641: 637: 636: 631: 626: 620: 619: 616: 610: 609: 608: 607: 603: 599: 594: 580: 577: 569: 563: 562: 561: 557: 556: 551: 546: 540: 539: 536: 531: 528: 524: 520: 519: 518: 517: 514: 506: 500: 496: 480: 476: 475: 470: 465: 459: 458: 455: 449: 448: 447: 444: 439: 438: 437: 433: 432: 427: 422: 416: 415: 412: 406: 405: 404: 403: 400: 396: 391: 367: 363: 362: 357: 352: 346: 345: 342: 336: 335: 334: 331: 327: 326: 325: 321: 320: 315: 310: 304: 303: 300: 295: 294: 293: 290: 286: 285: 284: 280: 279: 274: 269: 263: 262: 259: 254: 252: 248: 247: 242: 237: 231: 230: 227: 222: 221: 220: 217: 213: 212: 211: 207: 206: 201: 196: 190: 189: 186: 180: 179: 178: 177: 174: 173: 172: 167: 166: 165: 153: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 132: 128: 122: 118: 114: 110: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 8451: 8435: 8432: 8391: 8375: 8372: 8346: 8315: 8309:Buster Seven 8307: 8297: 8283: 8267: 8264: 8228: 8222:Buster Seven 8220: 8197: 8191:Buster Seven 8189: 8184: 8168: 8152: 8149: 8145:User:Keilana 8130: 8124:Buster Seven 8122: 8116: 8108: 8098: 8044: 8028: 8025: 7968: 7952: 7949: 7935: 7919: 7916: 7910: 7888: 7870: 7802:Farmer Brown 7773: 7751: 7735: 7732: 7679: 7663: 7647: 7644: 7618: 7615: 7595: 7579: 7576: 7562:Anthonyhcole 7545: 7529: 7526: 7507:Anthonyhcole 7503: 7488: 7472: 7469: 7465: 7444: 7403:Anthonyhcole 7383: 7365: 7349: 7346: 7332: 7316: 7313: 7287: 7271: 7255: 7252: 7239: 7223: 7220: 7195: 7184: 7168: 7165: 7143: 7125: 7114: 7098: 7095: 7077: 7062: 7019: 7003: 7000: 6928: 6912: 6909: 6885: 6878: 6860: 6844: 6841: 6812: 6776: 6770: 6763: 6762: 6756: 6724: 6708: 6705: 6697: 6639: 6623: 6620: 6616: 6615: 6610: 6596:Farmer Brown 6591: 6586: 6582: 6561: 6558: 6541:Farmer Brown 6523: 6459: 6425: 6409: 6406: 6391:RGloucester 6376: 6360: 6357: 6332: 6316: 6313: 6249: 6233: 6230: 6213:RGloucester 6205: 6168: 6152: 6149: 6144: 6127: 6126: 6120: 6098: 6082: 6079: 6049: 6033: 6030: 6012: 5996: 5993: 5952: 5951: 5945: 5944: 5920: 5915: 5908: 5905: 5898: 5859: 5853:Buster Seven 5851: 5833: 5817: 5814: 5796: 5741: 5733: 5711: 5705:Buster Seven 5703: 5693: 5689: 5616: 5610:Buster Seven 5608: 5569: 5553: 5550: 5544: 5530: 5524:Buster Seven 5522: 5515: 5497: 5481: 5478: 5444: 5424: 5408: 5405: 5387: 5384: 5361: 5345: 5342: 5315: 5312:Sally Season 5255: 5239: 5236: 5201: 5180: 5164: 5161: 5148: 5132: 5129: 5124: 5096: 5073:User:Turco85 5070: 5048: 5032: 5029: 4997: 4981: 4978: 4955: 4916: 4900: 4897: 4888:WP:FILEMOVER 4882: 4859: 4843: 4827: 4824: 4811: 4795: 4792: 4788: 4771: 4770: 4763: 4755: 4739: 4723: 4720: 4702: 4686: 4670: 4667: 4646: 4642: 4579: 4563: 4560: 4513: 4497: 4494: 4465: 4449: 4446: 4413: 4397: 4394: 4363: 4300: 4295: 4292: 4236: 4220: 4217: 4194: 4175: 4161: 4160: 4154: 4153: 4151: 4093: 4077: 4074: 4045:— Preceding 4038: 4027: 4011: 4008: 3988: 3984: 3978: 3956: 3940: 3937: 3925: 3917: 3916: 3909: 3894:Gerda Arendt 3877: 3861: 3858: 3830: 3801: 3785: 3782: 3762: 3746: 3730: 3727: 3697: 3666: 3650: 3647: 3614: 3598: 3595: 3573: 3549: 3533: 3530: 3494: 3478: 3475: 3457: 3416:HafniumDrive 3413: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3400:legal threat 3399: 3395: 3392: 3379: 3364: 3348: 3345: 3322: 3306: 3303: 3297:Clint Howard 3265: 3245:Joefromrandb 3230:Joefromrandb 3224: 3222: 3199:Neutralhomer 3184: 3168: 3165: 3145:Neutralhomer 3137:Updated the 3136: 3110:Neutralhomer 3094: 3078: 3075: 3062: 3054: 3053: 3046: 3020:Neutralhomer 3000: 2984: 2981: 2963:Neutralhomer 2935: 2919: 2916: 2911: 2906: 2901: 2883:Neutralhomer 2870: 2852: 2789: 2787: 2768: 2752: 2736: 2733: 2714: 2692: 2676: 2673: 2659: 2658: 2651: 2629: 2613: 2610: 2592: 2591: 2584: 2579: 2543: 2527: 2524: 2497: 2479: 2463: 2460: 2427: 2400: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2351: 2335: 2332: 2315: 2299: 2296: 2251: 2235: 2232: 2196: 2180: 2177: 2172: 2160: 2159: 2121: 2105: 2102: 2066: 2050: 2047: 2031: 2030: 2024: 2023: 1991: 1975: 1972: 1953: 1922:Anthonyhcole 1917: 1913: 1889: 1873: 1870: 1851:Anthonyhcole 1846: 1842: 1826: 1810: 1807: 1791:Anthonyhcole 1782: 1779: 1753: 1737: 1734: 1719:Anthonyhcole 1706: 1690: 1687: 1660:Anthonyhcole 1654: 1653: 1635: 1630: 1613: 1593: 1577: 1574: 1569: 1529:Anthonyhcole 1523: 1493: 1477: 1474: 1455: 1440: 1437: 1415: 1413: 1411: 1355: 1339: 1336: 1326: 1308: 1292: 1289: 1270: 1238: 1222: 1219: 1199:Hutchison 3G 1192: 1178: 1138: 1122: 1119: 1101: 1097: 1087: 1056: 1040: 1037: 1012: 996: 993: 974: 958: 943: 927: 924: 918: 913: 901: 900: 894: 893: 876: 860: 857: 851: 839: 838: 832: 831: 824: 782: 766: 763: 758: 723: 707: 704: 699: 674: 669: 633: 617: 614: 590: 553: 537: 534: 526: 522: 501:- thoughts? 492: 472: 456: 453: 429: 413: 410: 394: 389: 387: 359: 343: 340: 317: 301: 298: 276: 260: 257: 244: 228: 225: 203: 187: 184: 170: 169: 163: 162: 159: 136: 106: 78: 43: 37: 8099:Please see 7079:She's good! 6795:quick check 6781:in Vermont? 6773:spider webs 6456:Sock puppet 6284:John Carter 5675:Writ Keeper 5441:for testing 5437:Requesting 4789:In progress 4355:User:Ewawer 2948:User:Drmies 2445:Truthkeeper 1277:Dr. Blofeld 587:Wow! Signal 384:A goof am I 36:This is an 8111:new user, 7520:It was at 7059:Cool album 6791:here's how 6139:I suggest 6128:zeeyanketu 6064:SPhilbrick 5698:palm print 4752:ANI notice 4178:Tim98Seven 3266:as a whole 2956:User:RexxS 2710:Naqshbandi 2494:MONGO Beck 1961:Nobody Ent 1918:ad hominem 1914:ad hominem 1847:Ad hominem 1843:ad hominem 1783:ad hominem 1267:Jesse Cook 141:. Thanks, 95:Archive 15 90:Archive 14 85:Archive 13 79:Archive 12 73:Archive 11 68:Archive 10 8302:dustballs 8298:on strike 8247:DEIDRA C. 7849:Pelarmian 7823:IRWolfie- 7783:IRWolfie- 7422:Prioryman 7387:Prioryman 7161:talk page 7034:Adjwilley 6983:Adjwilley 6956:Adjwilley 6891:Adjwilley 6592:ourselves 6202:Any news? 5923:Lord Roem 5651:Adjwilley 5632:Adjwilley 4892:new files 4772:Strikeout 4764:Automatic 4289:template. 4148:template. 3918:Phightins 3837:Gilderien 3832:Brilliant 3462:bad faith 3055:Phightins 2849:template. 2660:Strikeout 2652:Automatic 2593:Strikeout 2585:Automatic 1520:Responded 1408:template. 914:generally 125:Read the 60:Archive 5 8453:Join WER 8393:Join WER 8285:Join WER 8170:Join WER 8120:way. ``` 8046:Join WER 7970:Join WER 7937:Join WER 7911:eighteen 7753:Join WER 7682:elektrik 7665:Join WER 7621:elektrik 7597:Join WER 7547:Join WER 7490:Join WER 7367:Join WER 7334:Join WER 7294:Tijfo098 7273:Join WER 7241:Join WER 7186:Join WER 7116:Join WER 7021:Join WER 6930:Join WER 6862:Join WER 6818:nominate 6801:DYKSTATS 6726:Join WER 6641:Join WER 6611:On break 6539:Fixed. 6526:Tijfo098 6504:ColaXtra 6470:ColaXtra 6427:Join WER 6378:Join WER 6334:Join WER 6251:Join WER 6170:Join WER 6100:Join WER 6051:Join WER 6014:Join WER 5988:Jclemens 5874:Gtwfan52 5835:Join WER 5799:Gtwfan52 5782:Gtwfan52 5767:Gtwfan52 5748:Gtwfan52 5571:Join WER 5499:Join WER 5426:Join WER 5389:DeeJermo 5363:Join WER 5257:Join WER 5182:Join WER 5150:Join WER 5050:Join WER 4999:Join WER 4918:Join WER 4845:Join WER 4813:Join WER 4741:Join WER 4688:Join WER 4639:dogs ... 4581:Join WER 4515:Join WER 4467:Join WER 4415:Join WER 4238:Join WER 4095:Join WER 4059:contribs 4047:unsigned 4029:Join WER 3958:Join WER 3879:Join WER 3803:Join WER 3748:Join WER 3706:Besieged 3668:Join WER 3628:Besieged 3616:Join WER 3580:Besieged 3570:Oct 2012 3551:Join WER 3496:Join WER 3440:Garamond 3414:Thanks! 3366:Join WER 3324:Join WER 3186:Join WER 3096:Join WER 3002:Join WER 2937:Join WER 2877:this one 2873:This one 2854:Gtwfan52 2772:Gtwfan52 2765:Question 2754:Join WER 2694:Join WER 2631:Join WER 2545:Join WER 2481:Join WER 2402:Join WER 2353:Join WER 2317:Join WER 2253:Join WER 2198:Join WER 2156:Jclemens 2123:Join WER 2068:Join WER 1993:Join WER 1891:Join WER 1828:Join WER 1755:Join WER 1708:Join WER 1636:enormous 1595:Join WER 1555:Top down 1495:Join WER 1357:Join WER 1310:Join WER 1254:Tijfo098 1240:Join WER 1203:Tijfo098 1181:Tijfo098 1153:Talkback 1140:Join WER 1058:Join WER 1014:Join WER 945:Join WER 878:Join WER 784:Join WER 725:Join WER 675:evidence 635:Join WER 555:Join WER 527:possible 474:Join WER 431:Join WER 361:Join WER 319:Join WER 278:Join WER 246:Join WER 205:Join WER 109:Tri-Five 6583:However 6145:editing 5010:WP:SOCK 4607:Flyer22 4592:Flyer22 4542:Flyer22 4527:Flyer22 4479:Flyer22 4431:Flyer22 4379:Flyer22 4359:Rogr101 3827:Blocked 3643:WP:DENY 3576:GoalRef 3471:pointed 3458:de jure 3342:WP:DENY 2021:block. 1098:actions 1072:ɐuɐʞsǝp 1028:ɐuɐʞsǝp 980:ɐuɐʞsǝp 967:harder. 671:noindex 666:noindex 593:Tdp1001 143:DPL bot 39:archive 8433:Dennis 8373:Dennis 8354:Frood! 8265:Dennis 8150:Dennis 8026:Dennis 7950:Dennis 7917:Dennis 7733:Dennis 7705:Steven 7645:Dennis 7577:Dennis 7527:Dennis 7470:Dennis 7445:should 7347:Dennis 7314:Dennis 7253:Dennis 7221:Dennis 7166:Dennis 7096:Dennis 7001:Dennis 6973:Here's 6910:Dennis 6842:Dennis 6826:Drmies 6706:Dennis 6621:Dennis 6486:WP:SPA 6407:Dennis 6358:Dennis 6314:Dennis 6231:Dennis 6150:Dennis 6080:Dennis 6069:(Talk) 6031:Dennis 5994:Dennis 5964:Isarra 5815:Dennis 5551:Dennis 5479:Dennis 5406:Dennis 5343:Dennis 5288:Cavann 5237:Dennis 5162:Dennis 5130:Dennis 5121:WP:DRN 5077:Cavann 5030:Dennis 4979:Dennis 4898:Dennis 4825:Dennis 4793:Dennis 4721:Dennis 4668:Dennis 4561:Dennis 4556:WP:SPI 4495:Dennis 4447:Dennis 4395:Dennis 4311:berate 4218:Dennis 4075:Dennis 4009:Dennis 3938:Dennis 3859:Dennis 3783:Dennis 3728:Dennis 3648:Dennis 3596:Dennis 3531:Dennis 3512:Sitush 3476:Dennis 3466:WP:NPA 3346:Dennis 3304:Dennis 3166:Dennis 3076:Dennis 2982:Dennis 2917:Dennis 2912:usable 2791:Jethro 2734:Dennis 2674:Dennis 2646:here's 2644:Well, 2611:Dennis 2606:WT:NPP 2525:Dennis 2461:Dennis 2382:Dennis 2333:Dennis 2297:Dennis 2233:Dennis 2178:Dennis 2103:Dennis 2048:Dennis 1973:Dennis 1956:WP:ANI 1871:Dennis 1808:Dennis 1735:Dennis 1688:Dennis 1575:Dennis 1475:Dennis 1443:WP:FAC 1417:Jethro 1337:Dennis 1290:Dennis 1220:Dennis 1120:Dennis 1069:(ʞɿɐʇ) 1038:Dennis 1025:(ʞɿɐʇ) 994:Dennis 977:(ʞɿɐʇ) 925:Dennis 858:Dennis 801:really 764:Dennis 745:really 705:Dennis 684:really 615:Dennis 571:really 535:Dennis 508:really 454:Dennis 411:Dennis 341:Dennis 299:Dennis 258:Dennis 226:Dennis 185:Dennis 8469:Tib42 8436:Brown 8413:Bbb23 8376:Brown 8268:Brown 8216:Sarah 8153:Brown 8029:Brown 7953:Brown 7920:Brown 7736:Brown 7710:Zhang 7687:SHOOS 7648:Brown 7626:SHOOS 7580:Brown 7530:Brown 7473:Brown 7350:Brown 7317:Brown 7256:Brown 7224:Brown 7169:Brown 7099:Brown 7004:Brown 6913:Brown 6845:Brown 6709:Brown 6654:Bbb23 6624:Brown 6562:isn't 6410:Brown 6361:Brown 6317:Brown 6234:Brown 6153:Brown 6117:Query 6083:Brown 6034:Brown 5997:Brown 5953:Vesey 5899:By a 5818:Brown 5554:Brown 5545:right 5482:Brown 5409:Brown 5346:Brown 5328:Sædon 5240:Brown 5203:Turco 5165:Brown 5133:Brown 5098:Turco 5033:Brown 4982:Brown 4901:Brown 4828:Brown 4796:Brown 4724:Brown 4671:Brown 4564:Brown 4498:Brown 4450:Brown 4398:Brown 4370:here. 4221:Brown 4162:Vesey 4078:Brown 4012:Brown 3941:Brown 3862:Brown 3786:Brown 3731:Brown 3651:Brown 3599:Brown 3534:Brown 3479:Brown 3445:Lethe 3349:Brown 3307:Brown 3169:Brown 3079:Brown 2985:Brown 2920:Brown 2907:think 2737:Brown 2718:Bbb23 2677:Brown 2614:Brown 2528:Brown 2464:Brown 2385:Brown 2336:Brown 2328:WP:AN 2300:Brown 2275:Bbb23 2236:Brown 2181:Brown 2138:Bbb23 2106:Brown 2084:Bbb23 2082:on.-- 2051:Brown 2032:Vesey 2008:Bbb23 1976:Brown 1874:Brown 1811:Brown 1738:Brown 1691:Brown 1578:Brown 1478:Brown 1340:Brown 1293:Brown 1223:Brown 1123:Brown 1106:Coren 1041:Brown 997:Brown 928:Brown 902:Vesey 861:Brown 852:other 840:Vesey 767:Brown 708:Brown 618:Brown 538:Brown 457:Brown 443:Coren 414:Brown 399:Coren 344:Brown 330:Coren 302:Brown 289:Coren 261:Brown 229:Brown 216:Coren 188:Brown 171:Vesey 16:< 8417:talk 8317:Talk 8251:talk 8230:Talk 8199:Talk 8132:Talk 8103:and 8077:talk 8015:talk 7992:talk 7899:talk 7881:talk 7853:talk 7845:here 7827:talk 7806:talk 7787:talk 7693:talk 7632:talk 7566:talk 7511:talk 7453:talk 7426:talk 7407:talk 7391:talk 7298:talk 7208:talk 7150:talk 7065:this 7039:talk 6988:talk 6977:here 6961:talk 6946:and 6896:talk 6875:Tool 6830:talk 6687:talk 6672:talk 6658:talk 6600:talk 6571:talk 6545:talk 6530:talk 6508:talk 6494:talk 6474:talk 6396:talk 6346:talk 6303:talk 6288:talk 6273:talk 6228::/ 6218:talk 6190:talk 5946:Ryan 5927:talk 5901:vote 5878:talk 5861:Talk 5803:talk 5786:talk 5771:talk 5752:talk 5744:here 5713:Talk 5656:talk 5637:talk 5618:Talk 5598:talk 5532:Talk 5463:talk 5393:talk 5318:this 5292:talk 5213:Talk 5108:Talk 5081:talk 5018:talk 4967:talk 4937:talk 4883:Done 4867:talk 4709:talk 4648:Ched 4611:talk 4596:talk 4546:talk 4531:talk 4483:talk 4435:talk 4383:talk 4301:lisk 4296:Basa 4205:talk 4182:talk 4155:Ryan 4055:talk 3997:talk 3898:talk 3841:Chat 3834:. -- 3710:talk 3632:talk 3584:talk 3516:talk 3420:talk 3249:talk 3234:talk 3205:Talk 3151:Talk 3116:Talk 3026:Talk 2969:Talk 2954:and 2889:Talk 2858:talk 2776:talk 2722:talk 2564:talk 2512:talk 2503:This 2449:talk 2435:7754 2432:chen 2418:talk 2279:talk 2218:talk 2168:year 2142:talk 2088:talk 2025:Ryan 2012:talk 1926:talk 1855:talk 1795:talk 1787:this 1723:talk 1664:talk 1631:more 1533:talk 1527:. -- 1511:talk 1462:talk 1258:talk 1207:talk 1185:talk 919:most 895:Ryan 833:Ryan 759:does 700:tell 654:talk 602:talk 495:diif 395:know 164:Ryan 147:talk 8187:``` 7867:SPI 7781:). 6751:On 6587:not 6555:YRC 6125:--- 5849:``` 5123:. 4933:BDD 4863:BDD 4284:ygm 4279:or 4201:Kww 4143:ygm 4138:or 3301::) 2875:or 2844:ygm 2839:or 2576:NPP 1614:of 1445:of 1403:ygm 1398:or 1327:Why 1102:why 805:can 797:You 749:can 741:You 688:can 680:You 575:can 567:You 512:can 504:You 390:was 156:SPI 127:FAQ 113:Cid 8442:2¢ 8439:- 8419:) 8382:2¢ 8379:- 8352:) 8274:2¢ 8271:- 8253:) 8159:2¢ 8156:- 8079:) 8035:2¢ 8032:- 8017:) 7994:) 7959:2¢ 7956:- 7926:2¢ 7923:- 7901:) 7883:) 7855:) 7847:. 7829:) 7808:) 7789:) 7742:2¢ 7739:- 7695:) 7654:2¢ 7651:- 7634:) 7586:2¢ 7583:- 7568:) 7536:2¢ 7533:- 7513:) 7505:-- 7479:2¢ 7476:- 7455:) 7428:) 7409:) 7401:-- 7393:) 7356:2¢ 7353:- 7323:2¢ 7320:- 7300:) 7262:2¢ 7259:- 7230:2¢ 7227:- 7210:) 7175:2¢ 7172:- 7152:) 7105:2¢ 7102:- 7081:♦ 7010:2¢ 7007:- 6979:. 6952:. 6919:2¢ 6916:- 6851:2¢ 6848:- 6832:) 6793:, 6755:, 6715:2¢ 6712:- 6689:) 6674:) 6660:) 6630:2¢ 6627:- 6594:. 6573:) 6547:) 6532:) 6510:) 6496:) 6476:) 6468:. 6416:2¢ 6413:- 6398:) 6367:2¢ 6364:- 6348:) 6323:2¢ 6320:- 6305:) 6290:) 6275:) 6240:2¢ 6237:- 6220:) 6192:) 6159:2¢ 6156:- 6089:2¢ 6086:- 6040:2¢ 6037:- 6003:2¢ 6000:- 5929:) 5880:) 5824:2¢ 5821:- 5805:) 5788:) 5773:) 5754:) 5734:. 5600:) 5560:2¢ 5557:- 5488:2¢ 5485:- 5465:) 5415:2¢ 5412:- 5395:) 5352:2¢ 5349:- 5294:) 5246:2¢ 5243:- 5216:) 5207:85 5171:2¢ 5168:- 5139:2¢ 5136:- 5111:) 5102:85 5083:) 5039:2¢ 5036:- 5020:) 4988:2¢ 4985:- 4969:) 4939:) 4907:2¢ 4904:- 4869:) 4834:2¢ 4831:- 4802:2¢ 4799:- 4730:2¢ 4727:- 4711:) 4677:2¢ 4674:- 4654:? 4651:: 4613:) 4598:) 4570:2¢ 4567:- 4548:) 4533:) 4504:2¢ 4501:- 4485:) 4456:2¢ 4453:- 4437:) 4404:2¢ 4401:- 4385:) 4339:- 4287:}} 4281:{{ 4277:}} 4271:{{ 4227:2¢ 4224:- 4207:) 4199:.— 4184:) 4146:}} 4140:{{ 4136:}} 4130:{{ 4084:2¢ 4081:- 4061:) 4057:• 4018:2¢ 4015:- 3999:) 3947:2¢ 3944:- 3910:Go 3900:) 3868:2¢ 3865:- 3792:2¢ 3789:- 3737:2¢ 3734:- 3712:) 3657:2¢ 3654:- 3634:) 3605:2¢ 3602:- 3586:) 3540:2¢ 3537:- 3518:) 3485:2¢ 3482:- 3422:) 3402:? 3355:2¢ 3352:- 3313:2¢ 3310:- 3251:) 3236:) 3225:me 3208:• 3202:• 3175:2¢ 3172:- 3154:• 3148:• 3119:• 3113:• 3085:2¢ 3082:- 3047:Go 3029:• 3023:• 2991:2¢ 2988:- 2972:• 2966:• 2950:, 2926:2¢ 2923:- 2914:. 2892:• 2886:• 2860:) 2847:}} 2841:{{ 2837:}} 2831:{{ 2778:) 2743:2¢ 2740:- 2724:) 2683:2¢ 2680:- 2620:2¢ 2617:- 2566:) 2534:2¢ 2531:- 2514:) 2470:2¢ 2467:- 2451:) 2429:Rs 2420:) 2391:2¢ 2388:- 2342:2¢ 2339:- 2306:2¢ 2303:- 2281:) 2242:2¢ 2239:- 2230:. 2220:) 2187:2¢ 2184:- 2164:" 2144:) 2112:2¢ 2109:- 2090:) 2057:2¢ 2054:- 2014:) 1982:2¢ 1979:- 1928:) 1880:2¢ 1877:- 1857:) 1817:2¢ 1814:- 1797:) 1744:2¢ 1741:- 1725:) 1697:2¢ 1694:- 1666:) 1584:2¢ 1581:- 1535:) 1484:2¢ 1481:- 1464:) 1453:. 1406:}} 1400:{{ 1396:}} 1390:{{ 1346:2¢ 1343:- 1322:, 1299:2¢ 1296:- 1229:2¢ 1226:- 1209:) 1187:) 1129:2¢ 1126:- 1093:) 1047:2¢ 1044:- 1003:2¢ 1000:- 975:-- 934:2¢ 931:- 867:2¢ 864:- 821:CU 773:2¢ 770:- 738:- 714:2¢ 711:- 656:) 624:2¢ 621:- 604:) 544:2¢ 541:- 463:2¢ 460:- 441:— 420:2¢ 417:- 350:2¢ 347:- 308:2¢ 305:- 267:2¢ 264:- 235:2¢ 232:- 194:2¢ 191:- 149:) 119:| 64:← 8447:© 8415:( 8387:© 8279:© 8249:( 8164:© 8075:( 8040:© 8013:( 7990:( 7964:© 7931:© 7897:( 7879:( 7851:( 7825:( 7804:( 7785:( 7747:© 7691:( 7659:© 7630:( 7591:© 7564:( 7541:© 7509:( 7484:© 7451:( 7424:( 7405:( 7389:( 7361:© 7328:© 7296:( 7267:© 7235:© 7206:( 7180:© 7148:( 7110:© 7041:) 7037:( 7032:~ 7015:© 6990:) 6986:( 6981:~ 6963:) 6959:( 6954:~ 6924:© 6898:) 6894:( 6889:~ 6856:© 6828:( 6816:( 6807:. 6797:) 6789:( 6720:© 6685:( 6670:( 6656:( 6635:© 6598:( 6569:( 6543:( 6528:( 6506:( 6492:( 6472:( 6421:© 6394:( 6372:© 6344:( 6328:© 6301:( 6286:( 6271:( 6245:© 6216:( 6188:( 6164:© 6094:© 6045:© 6008:© 5967:༆ 5925:( 5876:( 5829:© 5801:( 5784:( 5769:( 5750:( 5681:♔ 5678:⚇ 5671:) 5667:( 5658:) 5654:( 5649:~ 5639:) 5635:( 5630:~ 5596:( 5565:© 5493:© 5461:( 5420:© 5391:( 5357:© 5290:( 5251:© 5210:( 5176:© 5144:© 5105:( 5079:( 5044:© 5016:( 4993:© 4965:( 4935:( 4912:© 4865:( 4839:© 4807:© 4735:© 4707:( 4682:© 4609:( 4594:( 4575:© 4544:( 4529:( 4509:© 4481:( 4461:© 4433:( 4409:© 4381:( 4357:/ 4307:⁄ 4232:© 4203:( 4180:( 4089:© 4053:( 4041:1 4023:© 3995:( 3952:© 3926:! 3896:( 3873:© 3843:| 3797:© 3742:© 3708:( 3662:© 3630:( 3610:© 3582:( 3545:© 3514:( 3490:© 3434:) 3430:( 3418:( 3360:© 3318:© 3247:( 3232:( 3180:© 3090:© 3063:! 3041:) 3037:( 2996:© 2931:© 2856:( 2797:B 2774:( 2748:© 2720:( 2688:© 2625:© 2562:( 2539:© 2510:( 2475:© 2447:( 2416:( 2396:© 2347:© 2311:© 2277:( 2271:) 2267:( 2247:© 2216:( 2192:© 2140:( 2117:© 2086:( 2062:© 2010:( 1987:© 1924:( 1885:© 1853:( 1822:© 1793:( 1749:© 1721:( 1702:© 1662:( 1589:© 1531:( 1513:) 1509:( 1489:© 1460:( 1423:B 1351:© 1304:© 1260:) 1256:( 1234:© 1205:( 1197:( 1183:( 1168:. 1134:© 1091:← 1089:( 1052:© 1008:© 939:© 872:© 778:© 719:© 652:( 629:© 600:( 549:© 468:© 425:© 355:© 313:© 272:© 240:© 199:© 145:( 133:. 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index