User talk:Cyberlink420

1181:

problems I talk to them like this directly and try to solve it. I do not want to argue with you and whatever happens behind PMs with other people is none of your concern. You obviously didn’t read anything of what I had to say because you’re just concerned about "being here longer than me". Being here longer than others doesn’t mean you know everything about Knowledge, and maybe people “below” you might know more — it’s irrelevant. But yes, it’s always better to listen to veterans because they have more experience, but being irrational never helps. I’ve listened to the guidance other Wikipedians have given me, and if I was unclear about something or did something wrong, I fixed it. But this is about the importance scale on WikiProjects — one of which I have been a part of since near the start. When talking to other Wikipedias, next time, try to be reasonable and stop being arrogant through irrational behavior, or else others will get frustrated with you. It’s not the first time you’ve had this problem with others on here. I am no longer replying to this thread. Take it up with the projects, please — for any concerns.

1283:

admitted it several times, unlike your personality. I was mostly wrong here, but not for what I asked of you — which was a simple apology. Wow, thanks for opening old wounds and thanks for that amazing apology. Don’t talk to me again, I won’t respond to anything you say, and if you have anything to say, ask someone else to say it to me. Great job at proving your arrogance, and claiming things about me that weren’t true to begin with — both of which you failed to admit to when I mentioned it earlier today. I wish you a good life, don’t speak to me again.

3394:{{cite web | url=http://humongous.com/parents/Pr/More/News/playstation.html | title=Humongous Entertainment® Brings Award-Winning Humongous Sports™ CD-ROM Titles to PlayStation® Game Console and Game Boy® Color | author=Humongous Entertainment | date=May 11, 2000 | website=Humongous.com - News Releases | access-date=July 9, 2024 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001120124900/http://humongous.com/parents/Pr/More/News/playstation.html | archive-date=November 20, 2000}}</ref: --> 434: 1052:

Furthermore, undoing edits that don’t need to be undone is completely unnecessary, and anything that seemed off after your first few suggestions I removed. Look at it this way — if someone is claiming something is true and they keep reverting your edits, simply find some sources (which I have done already but couldn’t add them since you were continually reverting my edits, so I had to fix them before I could add the references). Again, don’t revert edits unless it’s absolutely necessary. :) --

3258: 459: 268: 3292: 1121:(although more significant hence the "High Importance" rating). If you feel like the projects should change their scaling requirements respectively or spot any errors, feel free to discuss it under their talk pages. I should also add that if I see a page under the incorrect rating, I usually tend to fix it going by their WikiProject guidelines and said scale. Thank you, hope this helps! Any other questions, feel free to reach out! Happy to clarify! — 2795: 2050: 871: 653: 184: 1137:

project, as all sources indicate she has not achieved nearly the level of recognizability that you suggest. I am led to believe that you are unable to make such judgment alls objecively due to your time spent editing the page, and I'd suggest that when multiple veteran editors are telling you you're in the wrong, you actually spend some time self-reflecting on why instead of continuing to push back and insist you're the one in the right. --

2479: 2528: 3083: 321: 2416: 1033:, so as per Knowledge policy, I put the notice on your page to warn you against doing so and get you to argue your point on the talk page instead of engaging in an edit war. Notice that I personally stopped at the third revision within 24 hours for that reason. I've been reverting your edits because many of them have been inaccurate, unsourced, or overly concerned wih minor details that would fall under 3478: 2365: 3098:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in 3187: 1010:

such, if you continue to engage in an edit war and remove information that doesn’t need to be, I will report to you Knowledge and their admins as what you’re doing violates both the vandal and spam rules. Look, I’ve tried to be reasonable, but you’re just making things worse, and apparently you have a history with these things to begin with. Again, sorry — but vandalism is never okay. --

285:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3522: 3029:

Twitter and Discord came directly from the CEO or the Chief Digital Officer, as both channels are the primary avenues of communication to users. While I sourced from third-party articles as best as possible, some information does not exist except through those digital channels. Could you advise how to address that in sourcing in the future?

3656:. I get that the sources are not high quality (Steam, Reddit) and primary (match statistics from server) but given the nature of it those are the only available ones. Better sources won't write about a semi-legal fan hack that made private servers available. Is there no way to include the info in the article? 1503:

Besides, if YouTube Videos & Twitter Tweets are allowed as references so long as they're legitimate, like with the Green Eggs & Ham (TV Series) Knowledge page having the Trailer on YouTube & the Announcement Date on a Netflix Twitter account as references, why not videos made by big names

1282:

Only by you mostly — and some of the times you were misunderstanding the situation. Other times I was contacted by other Wikipedians, they were understanding and explained it without acting arrogant and were extremely helpful and understanding, and I thanked them for it. And yes, I was wrong — I have

1116:

fits "High Importance" scale for being recognizable and being a culture icon outside of their respective video game (again, something may change in upcoming years that requires a reassessment, as maybe the character is canceled or no longer significant in culture, etc.). As for WikiProject Japan, the

570:

I even spoke with Jason Kaufman my self, and he believes an Editor claim is completely unreasonable. Because all he did was rip Mark's footage without permission. Alen only got the footage because he manipulated Jason. Alen then went and used said footage and put together a very half arsed "remaster"

3590:

list? There's an editor there who is well meaning, but keeps adding entries with tons of typos, sloppy prose, poor formatting, unreliable sources, etc. I had some extra free time yesterday, so I was able to fix most of them up recently, but I'm not going to have enough time to keep fixing them if he

2752:

It's fine, I just want to make sure we're using proper artwork. I couldn't find that particular piece you used the first time anywhere in the press kit or my rips of the in-game assets, so I'm not sure where it came from; it's noticeably uses a slightly different skin tone and color palette than the

1466:

In addition to people's gripes with the graphical differences of the tracks between the DLC & the Base game, other players & fans of the Mario Kart have raised other issues, like the DLC tracks' lack of Anti-Gravity Mechanics, & especially the DLC's lack of other content like characters,

1438:

Hey, Cyberlink420. Look. I stopped by and I wanted to apologize for all the trouble I never meant to cause. I never meant to be a pest when I kept editing the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe section to explain that the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe DLC has more than one issue. I only wanted to share additional info &

1151:

I don’t think you took the time to see the respective importance scales. The others agreed with me, so without trying to be harsh or anything, stop being arrogant and actually review things before you change them. Like I said, I’m going by the scales respectively and I have been doing that for every

740:

character page, I'm debating whether to move Don Karnage from the Supporting Characters section over to the F.O.W.L. section. Even though he was only with them in "The Last Adventure!" and technically in "The Lost Cargo of Kit Cloudkicker!", I don't know if that's enough to warrant the move since he

3028:

Hi there! I saw that all my changes got reverted. I am more or less giving up editing this article further at this point, but I wanted to reach out to clarify for my own edification. Regarding sourcing, I did use some Twitter and Discord sources. As this is an internet comedy company, messages from

2951:

Text distribution mostly. It looks a little weird when you have these short little paragraphs for each of the first three cases, then these huge blocks of text for 4 and 5. It just looks nicer when all the paragraphs are of roughly equal size. The other Ace Attorney articles were much the same way,

2664:

I do understand. However, some of the info on the plot you put down was not entirely correct. For instance, about the part where Fox sets the code and puts the off switch in place, you only mentioned Fox placing the switch, while it is actually possible to set the off code after placing the switch,

2615:

plot summary. However, your edit did leave a few typos and did leave out a few important details in the plot, such as Agent Gracefully giving Spy Fox the pill which can transform into skies; these were reasons why I edited the summary in the first place. I was touched by your revision and wanted to

2267:

You might have an uphill battle. In my experience, it's hard for articles without a lot of sources to make GA, especially if the game doesn't have a Metacritic score. At the bare minimum, I'd recommend making sure as many statements as possible in the Gameplay section have citations to verify them,

1786:

It's fine, just be careful next time. I know all too well how easy it is to get tunnel vision when you don't understand why someone reverted you. If something like this starts to happen again on another page, I suggest opening up a discussion on the article talk page after the second revision. That

1735:

I know you've been here a long time, and have an empty block log. But, that did not figure into my decision to block them and not you. In fact, I didn't even look at your history here before deciding on what to do. The point is; you've been here long enough to know better. Don't walk onto this thin

1637:

Appreciated, but the category shouldn't be deleted. All I'm doing is (manually, without automation) removing instances of the "Nintendo games" category when it's also categorized under one of its subcategories, such as "The Legend of Zelda games" or "Mario sports games". That doesn't apply to every

1136:

I'm well aware. I've been here much longer than you, as have the two other editors you reverted. And I stand by the fact that Ulala is of mid-tier importance to the video game project (comparable to other character examples listed like Fox McCloud or Jin Kazama) and low-tier importance to the Japan

1066:

It's not my responsibility to find sources for information you add. The burden of proof is on you, so you should add those sources when you first add the information, not after. And yes, anyone can place those warnings on anyone's page if they see someone violate the rule. In fact, they're supposed

89:

and it seems to lack notability. Sadly, I'm not familiar with his game so I have no idea what to add there. I guess being bold is a good option but I've wondered if it would be best if we can create a character list with all the playable characters at least so that this franchise have more coverage

3152:

My experience with edit conflicts is that you get a notice so typically, I try to mention that I'm resolving it in the edit summary (especially if I'm overwriting a previous edit). Regardless, you could have included an edit summary (such as "added M&M S2 to both tables") so other editors at a

3044:

As I said, Twitter is allowed, if used sparingly; we have the "Cite Tweet" template for that exact purpose. Discord absolutely is not, as those messages can't be viewed without having a Discord account and joining the server in question; there's no way for someone at a glance to click the link and

2631:

The trick to writing a good plot summary is to focus on the important bits. Spy Fox escaping after being confronted by goons or being trapped in the Dogbot's mouth are relevant details, but the fact he uses dehydrated skis or gears to do so probably aren't. Focus on making sure the major events of

2151:

when you tag pages for deletion and set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator" so then Twinkle can post these talk page notifications on your behalf. Alternatively, you can find an appropriate template or write a personal note to do this. It's important to alert content creators when

1731:

But let's be clear; asking for help and warning doesn't give you permission to continue an edit war either. If Southwestmetal (or any other account) reverts on that article again, don't revert. Ask for help. There's no deadline for the article to be in a particular state. Once help arrives, action

1474:

My reasons for adding the information I've been trying to add in the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe section of the Mario Kart 8 Knowledge page is because NOT everyone focuses on only one issue that the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe DLC has. You can't always say that the graphical differences is the ONLY issue that the

1248:

You said I mostly edit on fan wikis. That’s not true. I’ve barely edited on fan wikis, mostly on the Game of Thrones one, but that’s it. And I know the rules, so stop saying that I don’t, and stop pretending you were being reasonable the whole time. I would like an apology, because that’s the only

1180:

I’m placing the appropriate ratings back in about a day. If you want a reassessment, discuss it under the talk page and take it up with the respective WikiProjects like every other "veteran". I am going by their scales, I always have, and if it’s wrong I fix it without being biased. If there’s any

3594:(Side note - This isn't an attempt to canvass. There's no dispute here - most of the games legitimately qualify for the list. They just write really sloppy entries that need reviewing. I thought I'd ask you because you are so good at writing proper entries like I've been doing across the lists.) 2138:

It looks like you removed all of the contents of some categories and then tagged them for speedy deletion, CSD C1. This is called "emptying categories out of process" and is considered disruptive editing. If, in the future, you would like a category to be deleted, renamed or merged, please make a

1791:

and it demonstrates you're making a good faith effort to actually improve the article and work with other editors rather than taking a "my way or the highway" approach. Plus it's a lot easier to get other editors on your side when you explain why you're making a change (or alternatively, it gives

1867:

ArojamDharkon also reported mine looking correct. The issue comes down to the fact that you're viewing the list in a much smaller window than most desktop browsers. It's a moot point though, since the change I made to the columns just now is designed for accessibility on all browser window sizes

1691:

Stuff like Raiden and Sam dueling, Maverick continuing to support Raiden unofficially, Sunny being the one to assist Raiden, Raiden's sword being destroyed (which is the whole reason he needs to use Sam's), and so forth. Also, Knowledge's guidelines say the plot summary needs to be less than 700

1599:

Hi! I've initially placed a CSD tag on this, because the picture showed the logo of "Sonic Oranges" (you can find it in the File history section 07:20, 21 April 2022, same person moved the article to Sonic Oranges as well). After realizing it wasn't your fault, I restored the proper version back

1525:

So I hope you understand my reasons to why I wanted the information added to the section. But regardless, I do want to apologize to you, and want you to tell Sergecross73 & Dissident93 that I'm sorry. I only wanted to share information to help Mario Kart fans be aware of, & not cause any

1233:

I haven't said one word that isn't true, and I have attempted my best to explain to you your mistakes so you can avoid them in the future. I understand that you might be having a tough day, and I sympathize, but that's not an excuse to go around blaming other people because you don't have a full

1009:

I’ve tried to reason with you, and putting a fake block notice on my page is not okay. I am aware of the rules, and as far as I’m concerned, you’ve been reverting most of my edits on a lot of pages — even though there is nothing wrong with them (and I’ve only been putting them back properly). As

2687:

I played the Main Story of Sonic Superstars once with all Chaos Emeralds collected, and when I started on Trip's campaign the next day, I found she had access to all the Emerald powers from the off. That tells me that any Emeralds collected in the main campaign are carried over to Trip's story.

2017:

The source for that tweet is the exact same DKVine article; they just added a name where DK Vine didn't, with no proof that Loveday actually said these things. And some random Twitter account isn't a usable source either. You need to use sources that meet the requirements for verifiability on

1470:

Besides GameRant & Essentially Sports, the ONLY 2 internet sources who've touched about the latter topic in regards of lack of other contet such as characters, vehicles, & more, many people on Platforms such as Twitter & YouTube have either at least mentioned said issue, or even

1051:

Yes, I’m aware that I broke one of them, but you’re not permitted to place those notices on talk pages, hence “fake”. I’m not saying that a warning or a refresher isn’t necessary, but making it look like that I excessively vandalized something is not only an exaggeration, but mostly false.

3510: 2632:

the story are summarized, not so much on the little details of the puzzles solved to do it; that sort of thing would be better for a walkthrough. Also, Knowledge prefers that game and movie summaries are kept to 400–700 words total, so make sure you're staying within that limit. --

1533:

Besides, in my honest opinion, if tracks from Mario Kart Tour are coming over to Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, then surely, Nintendo should do the same with Tour's characters, vehicles, wheels, gliders, outfit / skins (characters alts from Tour), power-ups (maybe), & other content.

1692:

words. It used to be 706, just a little bit over the line, but the IP edit brought it down to 692, which is within the limit. There's no need to make any more changes because it's already acceptable. (Also, as I said, your changes were full of bad grammar and spelling.) --

2490:

for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can

988:

There, that's a proper primary source clarifying the title of the series, and I'll gladly accept that. You need to actually start providing sources like that when making those sorts of changes, or else they'll keep getting reverted, if not by me then by someone else. --

3316:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2169:

I just noticed that you created some of these categories. I still would prefer you wouldn't just empty them but in these cases, once they are empty, you can tag them for CSD G7 speedy deletion if no other editor has made a contribution to the page. Thank you.

3357:

game is one of those titles announced. I'm really sorry that I messed up. It just wouldn't allow me to take that citation to the page that shows the info. I'm just an amateur at editing. I just really wanted to make sure people were aware of this, because it

1218:

Okay, thank you for that. But can you stop making claims about me that are not true, and acting like you’ve been a reasonable dude the whole time? I’m not normally like this, but today’s been a real ticker for me. Sorry, I really am, I’m just asking a favor.

1439:

issues that I felt Mario Kart fans should at least be aware of. Needless to say, I've made an apology message to let you know that I'm sorry, but also want to explain my reasons to why I added the information that I made. My apology reads, and I quote...

1724:. The only reason I didn't was your willingness to engage in discussion on the article talk page, and your attempt to stop the edit war by way of posting a warning on their talk page. Another administrator might have blocked you. I am perhaps biased by 1529:

And with Mario Kart's 30th Anniversary coming this August, I wouldn't be surprised if Nintendo added more characters, vehicles, wheels, gliders, outfit / skins (characters alts from Tour), power-ups (maybe), & other content to Mario Kart 8 Deluxe.

1263:

You've had to have multiple rules and policies explained to you already at this point by both me and multiple others, including reliable sourcing, warning templates, and now the importance scale; I'm sorry if it sounds harsh, but if you don't want to

1619:

Heya, Looking at your recent contributions you appear to be removing all pages from a category by going page to page and removing it. (Which could imply automation, but not necessarily). It would be more efficient to just delete the category itself.

1481:

As much as I want to share legitimate sources that discuss the DLC's issue of Lack of characters, vehicles, & other content, the PROBLEM is that other than GameRant & Essentially sports, big name news sources, as far as I know of, DON'T DO

574:

Mark and Alen are not even good friends and haven't been for a long time. I don't know enough about wikipedia to get the proper protocols in place to stop him, but if do you know I ask you to try. Alen does not deserve to get away with this.

571:

with very little effort. He only THEN told Mark about it and tried to get the video UPLOADED TO ALEN'S youtube channel. After a long back and forth Mark eventually agreed to just upload the video to HIS channel, due to it being HIS CONTENT.

2282:

Yeah, I'm hopeful because I managed to get Alto's Odyssey through a couple of weeks ago, but I wouldn't be surprised if this one gets declined. I'll do another check for new sources and polish up some of the writing before I submit though.

1195:

That's not how this works. If multiple other people argue against it (and I, Haleth, and Zxcvbnm all have), it falls to you to make your case to change existing concensus, not the other way around. However, I have opened discussions on the

3319:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

3172: 2143:

so that other editors can weigh in on the category changes. These discussions are particularly important for categories because they exist in an interconnected category hierarchy so what affects one category can affect others as well.

1383:

We still need to give Mario Kart 8 Deluxe the recognition it deserves. So either we stick with that infobox (which is the wiser option), or I make a similar infobox for the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe portion of the article. You choose.

2665:

so the sentence really should be, "Moments after placing it back on the control console and setting the activation code, the millionth customer walks through the turnstile and LeRoach activates the Dogbot, attacking the fair."

3506: 1352:

Why did you revert back to the basic mk8 infobox? the one I did looks much better and I didn't change or delete anything. I added some things, and you mention Mario Kart 8 Deluxe in the article, so I suggest you keep it.

2670: 3417: 3367: 1103:

for more respective details), which means you must place the correct importance and rating with the corresponding article. Something that I clarified with the other two editors who continued to ignore the scale on

1896:

Actually, the way I reverted it to was how it was originally listed, as were the other crossovers. Some random anon changed them a few months back. (Also, you should really revert your last edit, as it violates

2767:

Yeah, the original I grabbed came from a bad source. Touched up the concept art while I was there too, mainly just going through all the old vg character pages and trying to redo the infobox art where it needs

3237: 1471:

criticized the issue. Even big name YouTubers like GameXplain, NintendoLife, & Arlo have mentioned or even wished that said content would be implemented to Mario Kart 8 Deluxe to go along with the tracks.

1638:

page, though, as there's lots of Nintendo games like Fossil Fighters and Hotel Dusk that aren't part of a subcategory, in which case they should be left under "Nintendo games". It's a case by case basis. --

3209: 2212:

One of my recent file i upload got nomation for deletion and that not the only file that got deletion or worse, other file also so that why i decided to 100% quit upload files to wikipedia and commons. :

1368:

No. You were already told once that the article only needs one piece of box art per the rules. The Wii U version came out first and is the primary focus of the article, so that's the art we're using. --

3505:

error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (

566:

I believe he made the new alias after we have been calling him out for editing the Knowledge article and making large chunks of it to give himself unfair and dishonest credit, under his "acekard" name.

482:. The article you are trying to force is nothing more than an opinion piece and should be treated as such, furthermore making false accusations is tantamount to libel. Please do not confuse the issue. 2824:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2079:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 898:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 680:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 211:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 46:

Thanks for stepping in and cleaning up the Yagami. I recently expanded Judgment so I guess that article needs some grammar tweaks. I also considered creating an article for Goro Majima considering

3389:. If you want to re-add that to the page, here's a properly-formatted citation that links directly to the archived version of the press release. Just paste this code at the end of the sentence: 1309:, the earliest edits of which predate your time on Knowledge. And that's okay! I'm not shaming you for editing fan wikis; those are fine, great even! Knowledge just has different standards. -- 277: 3628:

Thanks, appreciate it. It's mostly cleaned up at the moment, though the page history shows some entries I removed and couldn't piece back together, whether it be time or sourcing limitations.

3554: 3312: 1721: 262: 3280: 1152:

page I’ve edited that has been incorrectly placed. Like I said, if you have a problem with the WikiProject scales, take it up with them instead of me. I don’t make the rules. Thank you.

506: 2840: 2095: 1882:

With all due respect, though, it looks messy now, and feels very inconsistent with how rosters on other crossover games are listed. I much prefered it before, minus the column sizes.

914: 696: 227: 1751:

Yeah, that was my mistake. As someone who is an admin on another wiki, I should have known better and reached out sooner. Apologies again, and I'll be more careful in the future. --

2616:

help fix it, but I guess I went too far. I actually did try not to make the summary too long, while trying to put in as many important plot details as I could. Again, I apolagize.

2809: 2064: 884: 666: 197: 3429: 1816:? I honestly felt the edit I did made the table much neater. The columns are much better balanced, rather than extremely sloppily skewed to the right side as they were before. 2581: 3675:, both to establish the statements are verifiable and the information itself is notable. Sorry to say, but if the sources don't exist, there's not much that can be done. -- 3539: 2666: 2268:

and that the few raw URLs in the sources are converted to proper citations. Don't be surprised if it ends up not being enough, though; GA can be pretty strict sometimes. --

2152:

pages that they have created might be deleted. I'd appreciate it if you could take these steps in the future and also make use of CFD for any category deletions. Thank you.

2584:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3413: 3363: 1249:

thing I deserve right now, and because it’s the right thing to do on your part. Other than that, I’m done — I really don’t wanna interact with you if you can’t apologize.

3275: 1197: 589: 3661: 3217: 1564:

Hi, I wasn't forgetting Ikuro, but saying more than 40 characters taken from JoJo's is wrong since it's more like 40 characters from JoJo's and one from Bath you see?

1004: 1600:(including the vandalized text in the article) and removed the tag. Can that hoax previous version be reported to admins? I have no idea how that works now. Regards, 847:

Hey there. Apparently, Gutt01 is at it again and something tells me he's going to be the one-man army on reverting it every chance he gets. What are our options?

2423:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2026:

for video game sources to see what people think. But until and only if DKVine has been rated an acceptable source, do not use it as a citation on any pages. -- (

2207: 2187: 624:

No worries. the press stuff had been calling her Elizabert up till now, but since the game uses the shortened "Lizbert" in almost every instance (such as in the

558: 524: 3349:

page. You can get to that by clicking the "About Us" button on the front page, then click "Press Room", where you'll find a bunch of links to News Releases and

3331: 1537:

Not to mention that one day, Mario Kart Tour will shut down, just like Dr. Mario World did, so it'd be wise to preserve Tour's content in Mario Kart 8 Deluxe.

585: 309: 3371: 3576: 3453:

Sorry, wrote this before seeing your reverts. A wikilink is not a source and it needs to be discussed on the articles for the games themselves with sources.

1201: 755: 1019: 3468: 597: 489: 941: 722: 2875: 1583: 1569: 808: 253: 3447: 951: 3565:. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 2535: 2495:

within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

2674: 2300: 1546: 1516: 125: 3421: 3407: 982: 3060: 3030: 553: 3534: 2223: 1318: 1292: 1277: 1258: 1243: 1228: 1213: 1190: 1175: 1161: 1146: 784: 2867: 2306: 2122: 2989: 2023: 1421: 1407: 1393: 1378: 1076: 1061: 1046: 998: 837: 967:

For further clarification, it mentions that AiAi appears in all four Sega All-Stars video games in this trailer from SEGA Forever on YouTube:

2565: 1663: 1647: 1433: 153: 2753:

rest of the art, so that's why I suspected it might be off. The full-body HGH art works great, though, so I've got no problem with that. --

1760: 1609: 1554: 3548: 3540: 2909: 2492: 1717: 2904: 2575: 1701: 1592: 1478:

And everytime I saw that information removed, I felt that you were censoring information that Mario Kart fans could at least be aware of.

1166:

The others DIDN'T agree with you, though. They all said Mid for Video Games and Low for Japan. You're the only one arguing otherwise. --

861: 643: 168: 2329: 2612: 2252:

Hey, just wanted to mention that I'm planning to nominate the page for GA. Is there anything you'd recommend improving before I submit?

174: 1109: 159:

Not sure I understand; I don't see any citations on the DOY page. Do you mean the DOB needs to be cited on the individuals' pages? --

3301: 3018: 2927: 637: 135: 1500:

At least consider that you can't always focus on only one issue that fans have with the DLC. You have to consider OTHER issues, too.

119: 99: 78: 3377:

Totally all right, nobody starts editing already knowing everything! I checked, and you're correct, the press release does mention

3336: 3200:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

297: 2625: 2368:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2229:

Please read the Seven Sirens talk page. It was explained there why you can't upload images like that concept art to Commons. --

1130: 856: 130:

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see

3297: 3282: 3193: 3178: 2787: 2456: 2393: 2042: 842: 3351:

Humongous Entertainment® Brings Award-Winning Humongous Sports™ CD-ROM Titles to PlayStation® Game Console and Game Boy® Color

3347:

Humongous Entertainment® Brings Award-Winning Humongous Sports™ CD-ROM Titles to PlayStation® Game Console and Game Boy® Color

2261: 1587: 1573: 1507:

But all things considered, if you really don't want to me to edit the Mario Kart 8 page anymore, then fine, I'll knock it off.

1362: 2515: 2451: 1725: 750: 593: 3684: 3438:- the cancelled port should be discussed in the body of the article with sources to verify this before adding the category. 2292: 2277: 1801: 3657: 3494: 3470: 2863: 2655: 2641: 2606: 2388: 2334: 2118: 1891: 1877: 1862: 1844: 1772: 937: 718: 249: 3639: 3623: 1825: 3162: 3147: 2777: 2762: 2647: 2617: 1883: 1854: 1817: 1593: 1510:

Just at least PLEASE consider the OTHER issues that the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe DLC has, and not only one issue it has. Okay?

518: 497: 31: 3133: 2747: 2238: 131: 3068: 3054: 2979: 2961: 2473: 2410: 2012: 1991: 1977: 1963: 1559: 325: 2147:

You also didn't notify the category creator that you had tagged their page creations for deletion. Please make use of

281:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2712: 2697: 1685: 1096: 3462: 2946: 803: 363:. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The 3665: 3608: 3345:

page. You're right; the front page doesn't give any info on the cancelled game. I meant for the source to show the

2244: 509:, which is the whole reason why it was removed. Not libelous in the slightest. Also, learn to sign your posts. -- 417:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a

3249: 3228: 3174: 2975: 2942: 2923: 2859: 2199: 2114: 1631: 933: 714: 447: 245: 138:

or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the

3099: 427: 2682: 3117:

Just want to flag again that edit summaries are super useful for other editors. For example, with your recent

1745: 286: 3502: 3213: 1807: 1732:

may be taken by others. I know it can be irritating dealing with stuff like this, but patience is in order.

761: 731: 364: 3244:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2568:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1939: 3245: 3224: 2995: 2833: 2601: 2088: 1950:. DKVine is a fansite, and does not meet the verifiability requirements. Try finding a different source at 1344: 1105: 1086: 907: 689: 220: 59: 2845: 2732: 2163: 2100: 1467:

vehicles, wheels, gliders, outfits / skins (aka the "characters alts from Tour"), power-ups, & so on.

1092: 919: 701: 563:

Alen Alic / Acekard/ 7aces, is whom I believe is Crazyeditorguy22, or at the very least a friend of his.

232: 2181: 1540:

But regardless, please... Forgive me for all the trouble that I never meant to cause. I am truly sorry.

3571: 3111: 2585: 2571: 1813: 1298: 1100: 618: 3586:

Hey. Hope you've been well. If you have any free time here and there, can you help keep an eye on the

2552:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3305: 3045:

check if the information is accurate, especially now that the Dropout Discord is being shut down. --

1671: 1288: 1254: 1224: 1186: 1157: 1126: 493: 479: 27: 3087: 1780: 3562: 3530: 3038: 2288: 2257: 1776: 452: 1067:

to; blocks typically aren't issued unless a user has suffiiently been warned by other editors. --

3581: 3490: 3212:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 2651: 2621: 2458: 2395: 2336: 1887: 1858: 1821: 1417: 1389: 1358: 1113: 1057: 1015: 978: 375: 2914:

Out of curiosity, why did you group cases 1-3 together? It's fine either way, I'm just curious.

2001: 3634: 3603: 2520: 2130: 1605: 1302: 314: 35: 1306: 3647: 3566: 3327: 3158: 3129: 3107: 2821: 2773: 2743: 2728: 2540: 2076: 1659: 1627: 895: 799: 746: 677: 380: 208: 86: 1463:

In my opinion, talking only about one issue about the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe DLC is NOT enough.

1108:, you must go by the scale and not for any personal reflections or opinions. If you look at 3587: 3558:. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. 3121: 2832:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2487: 2428: 2347: 2219: 2087:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1741: 1550: 1284: 1250: 1220: 1182: 1153: 1122: 906:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 789: 688:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 581: 485: 400: 219:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 19: 1996:

As much as possible, they do not reveal anything about in-house information. According to

625: 8: 3526: 3482: 3458: 3443: 3064: 3034: 2971: 2938: 2919: 2284: 2253: 2008: 1973: 1935: 1921: 1117:

page fits "Mid Importance" due to her recognizable popularity in said country, much like

1091:

Just thought I’d clarify something. Each WikiProject has their own importance scale (see

1034: 530: 467: 423: 968: 1413: 1385: 1354: 1053: 1037:. Please further read Knowledge's policies before claiming I somehow violated them. -- 1011: 974: 23: 3676: 3629: 3615: 3598: 3399: 3342: 3271: 3139: 3091: 3046: 3014: 2953: 2900: 2881: 2803: 2754: 2704: 2693: 2661: 2633: 2511: 2447: 2384: 2325: 2269: 2230: 2191: 2148: 2058: 1983: 1955: 1927: 1902: 1869: 1836: 1793: 1752: 1693: 1681: 1639: 1614: 1601: 1450: 1446: 1399: 1370: 1310: 1269: 1235: 1205: 1167: 1138: 1068: 1038: 990: 878: 833: 780: 660: 629: 549: 510: 475: 418: 410: 360: 344: 336: 191: 160: 148: 115: 95: 74: 55: 3323: 3154: 3125: 3103: 2852: 2817: 2769: 2739: 2724: 2498: 2483: 2434: 2424: 2371: 2107: 2072: 1968:

Although it's a fansite, but there are remarks made by Rare's anonymous employees.

1947: 1716:

dispute. The two of you kept at it on the article and also created quite a mess at

1653: 1621: 1485:

The only people I know who discuss on or even at least mention such an issue are...

1454: 1265: 956:

I know it may seem confusing to you, but the series is actually now referred to as

926: 891: 795: 742: 708: 673: 405: 239: 204: 139: 2738:

Nevermind I saw the issue, sorry I took things at face value there. Gimme a bit.--

2022:. If you're really determined to use that source, I suggest bringing it up on the 1676:

What important details? How's the name of Sam's sword important for the narrative?

3672: 3341:

I can definitely get why you deleted the Backyard Football 2001 paragraph in the

3257: 2597: 2359: 2245: 2215: 2019: 1951: 1737: 1713: 1707: 852: 765: 603: 463: 356: 329: 305: 107: 3551:. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because 1412:

Fine. I'll leave it as is. But if you regret it, don't come crying to me later.

1204:

projects in order to seek outside input; I suggest you make your case there. --

3518: 3454: 3439: 3435: 3354: 2967: 2934: 2915: 2829: 2718: 2420: 2084: 2004: 1969: 1931: 1792:

other editors the opportunity to explain why they're reverting your edits). --

903: 685: 471: 385: 216: 41: 3517:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

142:

is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you.

2825: 2140: 2080: 1997: 1898: 1788: 1030: 899: 818: 681: 462:

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did at

395: 212: 3223:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

433: 3267: 3118: 3076: 3010: 3006: 2896: 2892: 2689: 2507: 2502: 2443: 2438: 2380: 2375: 2355: 2321: 2317: 1677: 1579: 1565: 829: 825: 814: 776: 772: 545: 541: 282: 143: 111: 91: 70: 51: 3153:

glance know the article has been updated to include the upcoming season.

2885: 2646:

Right. Again, I'm sorry for the trouble and hope you have a good day! 🤗

2557: 2547: 2469: 2462: 2406: 2399: 2351: 2340: 1494:-YouTubers, including big names like GameXplain, NintendoLife, & Arlo 1457:. I am so very sorry. It was never my intention to engage in an edit war. 1118: 443: 66: 3227:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2836:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2091:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1728:, and had some reluctance in blocking someone who was asking for help. 910:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

692:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

223:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3023: 2813:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2593: 2068:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1398:

Or you stop breaking the rules and leave the page as it was before. --

888:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

848: 670:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

301: 201:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3555:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Very Important People (2023 TV series)

3313:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Very Important People (2023 TV series)

1982:

If they're anonymous, you can't verify that the comments are real. --

2794: 2049: 1543:

Thank you very much, have a nice day, & stay healthy & safe.

870: 794:

I add more stuff on the premise section of Ghostbusters: Afterlife.--

652: 458: 390: 183: 2527: 1850: 3671:

Information on Knowledge needs to be cited to reliable sources per

3256:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2172: 2154: 613: 421:

you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

2723:

So why aren't we using full body artwork for the infobox exactly?

1868:

while also not wasting the available whitespace in the article --

1712:

I came very close to blocking you for edit warring as well in the

110:

since there was so much about her role in 5. Feel free to edit it.

3653: 3196:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3124:, I have no idea why you removed a source or made other changes. 2933:

Adding a reminder to sign my posts each time, I keep forgetting.

628:), I figured it makes more sense to follow common name rules. -- 2994: