2605:
and a section on later assessmanents of him. I think the choice of themes in the inscription and the decorations are highly significant and refelect or comment on many of the points made in the article. For example, I find the inscription's insistence on his pedigree and his father's achievements, to the extent of overloading the syntax, highly significant. I think there is a much greater emphasis on his role in the
Netherlands - not an entirely successful venture - than we might expect. I think the rapacious attitude to heraldry, taking in emblems of even the remotest relevance, is noteworthy. There is also the simple fact that Lettice Knollys chose to be buried and memorialised here, although she had 3 husbands, and that she chose to be portrayed - very convincingly and surely from life - at the age she did, when she lived to be 90.
618:
2226:
flowery. This article is a work of art, among the best I have seen. That is not because it is flowery and literary but because it is a good mirror of the moving biographic details. I have to confess, as I read it, "mes yeux pleuvent." Works of art make you laugh and weep, and I've done both on this. It's been rated good, it is good, it gives us something to shoot for in the other articles, let's leave it. One more thing, and I hope I can say this without being too insulting. If you interpreted this as an assertion of belief in ghosts, I think you would benefit by longer study of
English and English culture. It's a subtle point, no doubt; figures of speech generally are.
2771:. It's not like Charles and Wales because Robert Dudley is probably best known as Leicester, especially in non-specialist and international literature, as well as in older texts. Charles as a royal is another case altogether. Importantly, Leicester was not an earl all the time of his life, so he can't be called Leicester throughout the article, and he is increasingly called Dudley also as earl in the literature (but, as I said, by far not consistently). Most non-experts on English/European history who would read this article are probably perfectly aware who is who, and if they aren't they should notice when they look at the article title.
911:
272:
2255:
clan of secret botanists using their own cipher? Was Robert known for his magnificent anthers as well as his eyes, or what? Should we put on a tag asking for the expansion of the botanical aspects, to be filled in by you? You must know what you mean since you used the word. Well, enough of this reductio. Fare thee merry old well. We still use "ye" round heeyuh, disguised as written y'. Thee (du) is gone, however. We got the Dutch ja (yeah), so at least we have that in common. Excuse, me, I'm still getting choked up by Bess having to go on without Eyes. I'm a great fan of Lady Jane as well.
2572:
given him reason to hope." Also: "The craft of the courtier Robert learnt at the courts of Henry VIII and Edward VI." Again, it's a bit weird. Maybe change to "Robert learnt the craft of the courtier at the courts of Henry VIII and Edward VI." These sentences (and I'm sure there may be more) are just a bit confusing to read and at first I didn't think they made sense. I hope this helps. Otherwise, magnificent article! I'm researching
Leicester's early life for something I'm writing and it's among the best info I can find on the web.
153:
713:
692:
723:
519:
498:
927:
430:
409:
325:
304:
608:
587:
1275:
article as regards thematic scope. I have only made one new subdivision: Politics). However, I want to stress, that I have not taken away any quotations! In all cases, I could identify the original source from which the quote came. I have also given some references to facts mentioned in the original article, as there was no single reference (i.e.footnote) given in it. I have also put further quotations in the article, along with all the footnotes in there so far.
21:
107:
2091:
2068:
2054:
2025:
2009:
1988:
1978:
1953:
1939:
1925:
1894:
1880:
144:
210:
186:
895:
335:
943:
833:
797:
1385:
dispute that
Leicester was "one of the most important" statesmen of Elizabeth's government, notwithstanding the 1911 EB!). I cannot see why the tone should be "subjective": I mentioned different opinions, e.g. regarding Amy Dudley's death. Anyway, I personally will not change anything in the tone of the article, as I struggled very much with it already (the tone I found here was
991:, by Alison Weir, a Professor Iain Aird suggested in in 1956. The only primary evidence given in that book is that Alvaro de Quadra, a Bishop and a Spanish ambassador, wrote in April 1559 of her having "a malady of the breast". She implies that other sources confirm some kind of illness, and doesn't give details as to why breast cancer in particular was the conclusion.
220:
1645:
acceptance of the post. There is no cited evidence that "accepting the post of
Governor-General of the United Provinces" "infuriated his Queen". If, however, there is citable evidence that you can add showing the act of accepting the post, that she herself offered, directly angered the Queen, then I'm happy with your revert.
2715:
I'm afraid you are mistaken. Robert Dudley is the name and Earl of
Leicester is the title. They do not together make one name and are not treated as such. One is treated as the appositive of the other. If there is to be a comma separating them, there must also be another punctuation mark afterwards â
2604:
I am a little surprised at the pulling of the gallery I posted yesterday. The Dudley monuments at
Warwick represent a widow's valedictory statement. As such I don't understand how they can be said to "toally break up" a biographical article, especially when placed between a section on the man's death
2482:
I frankly don't understand your removal of the
Denbigh title, with this edit summary: "This, at least, is against common practice. The two titles were held at the same time and were passed on in an identical manner (i.e. not at all). Thus, there is no need for the lesser one (nor for the greater one,
2361:
This strikes me as an overly narrow interpretation of "succession". Just because someone was not immediately succeeded in a peerage title does not mean they did not hold the title or that the title was not, theoretically, hereditary. We've seen many such titles dissolved and recreated over the years,
2341:
Though the article itself if amazing, I find the number of succession boxes at the bottom of this article to be excessive. Many of them are, in fact, useless, since
Leicester's predecessors and successors are not named. We see only a big, black "Vacant" instead of those names. The succession box for
1680:
which infuriated her. As regards
Elizabeth (but not the Dutch), the treaty was old paper when Leicester went to the Netherlands in December 1585; Elizabeth's own instructions did only see him as Lieutenant-General and were (as it appears) in contradiction to the treaty which she had signed some three
1437:
over the centuries is surely "established academic opinion"; even Conyers Read acknowledged that, and he found it necessary to write about Leicester's death that "Indeed, England was well rid of him" in his standard biography of Cecil (so much for professorial neutrality). I tried not to use the word
1526:
also has it. Really embarrassing, but I didn't mention any Cambridge honorifics in the article, so no great damage, I hope. As regards the Offices box, I would like to point out that he was also Baron of Denbigh from 1564, along with being Earl of Leicester. The dating of the office of "Lord Steward
1438:"obvious", but it can be useful for nuances: "her obv.ly very intimate relationship" was meant in the literal sense: obvious to the contemporaries. If one writes that she had a "very intimate relationship", then this is biased (although, according to scores of contemp. sources, true) and so forth...
1274:
I just would like to tell everybody, that since about 4 February 2009, I have practically rewritten this article, since it seemed to me in great need of amendment (there was also box asking for it). I have added lots of facts, dates, as well as some aspects (although within the framework of the old
1202:
There seems to be some confusion about the demise of Robert Dudley's first wife, Amy Robsart. Paragraph two in the intro states "He is said to have poisoned his first wife Amy Robsart.." while the first paragraph in "Relationship With Elizabeth" says "She had previously suffered from breast cancer,
1139:
Being as how we're not mindreaders who lived with Elizabeth I (or I hope we aren't), how can we truly say she wished to marry him? She may have flirted with him a lot, but it isn't as if she said, "I wish I could have married Robert." I think we should change the first sentence, and I will do so if
2254:
QED, hey? Actually, I'm a bit confused by your use of "flowery." I looked at that passage rather carefully and I definitely did not see anything that might relate to botanical reproductive organs; no petals, no sepals, or any carpels. Are any of those words Linnaean coded names? Were the Dudleys a
1478:
Robert Dudley was also Vicechancellor of Cambridge University from 1563 till 1588. This is not in the box, but I am afraid, I don't know how to put it in there. Also, I don't know the preceding holder of that office, neither the successor. So, if somebody wants to find out, please help! Thank you.
1384:
got B-class. The latter used to be a most partial, unreferenced eulogy lifted entirely from the 1911 EB, containing hardly any factual information. There were mainly unreferenced attacks on other people. Regarding "peacock terms", they are well referenced, and they are not many (and one can hardly
1071:
Actually, because Dudley was a bit low-born, it is probably more likely that Elizabeth and he became friends later on (probably around the time he sold some of his estates and gave the money to her). Kings generally didn't allow their heirs (even if Elizabeth was considered a bastard) to socialize
2829:
Nothing in there answers my principle question, which is not about correct name formats (of which I long have been quite aware and you reminded me quite well above) but about alternating between two different names within just a few sentences in the same bio. Would be lovely if you'd give me your
2571:
Just skimming through this article i've seen a couple sentences that kind of make sense, but are awkward to read like "She giving him reason to hope, he was a suitor for the Queen's hand for many years." I feel like this should be "For many years he was a suitor for the hand of the Queen, who had
2440:
To reiterate my point, "no immediate successor" is a valid answer, and that information may be just as valuable to a reader as any other entry that could exist. So in my opinion, yes, it does make sense to have a succession box for hereditary titles and political offices even if there wasn't any
2209:
The language is still unencyclopedic and the GA class questionable imo. Just one example picked at random: "His wife's and his father's shadows haunted his prospects." (I first thought this was an assertion about ghosts on some of his property, but this is merely flowery unencyclopedic language.)
1169:
Leicester's date of birth is highly debatable. Contemporaries believed that he was born on the same day as Elizabeth, but this may have just been a fanciful rumour. June 24 the previous year is a recent calculation that seems more probable - especially since the earl was supposed to be older than
1025:
Actually, as I recall it, they started in the book that Amy's "heart was breaking". It was implied she might be poisoned, but I don't remember any mention of anything relating to breast cancer. And Philippa Gregory's work is not to be taken that seriously--she's well-known for her, er, "creative"
1620:
I'd would really regret to produce an edit war over this! But please, Doooglas, understand that the text in the lead of an article is not normally footnoted, as far as (uncontroversial) facts that are treated further down in the text are concerned. In the article section "Governor-General of the
1165:
I changed his birthdate from June 24 1532 to September 7 1533. In Elizabeth Jenkin's Elizabeth and Leicester she adresses the issue and cites several sources that state Robert and Elizabeth were born on the same day. Since I could only find one mention of the June 24 birthday and no comtemporary
1432:
Please, Hekerui, I didn't mean my comments today here so much directed to you (and I didn't mean to be rude). I meant rather the occasional passers-by. That's why I still have to clarify some points regarding "tone": That Leicester's reputation was very, very strongly influenced (negatively) by
1251:
Rewriting this article, I have given sources where putative children of Elizabeth and Leicester figure, in a footnote. I couldn´t include all cases, as there are innumerable, but the 1587 case is Arthur Dudley. I have my personal opinion about who he probably was, but cannot mention this in the
2225:
Disagree. English allows and is enriched by succinct and accurate figures of speech. Otherwise, what would you do, a sociologic and psychiatric analysis of just what is meant by that figure? How would we obtain any data on that? The meaning is just as clear as it can be. I wouldn't consider it
2463:
To reiterate my own point, it does make sense to have a succession box when there is no successor if there is a predecessor. If there is neither predecessor nor successor, then there is no succession, obviously. If there is no succession, a succession box is a meaningless waste of space. The
1644:
Don't worry, no edit war! Having looked into it in the section you refer to, it's clear that Elizabeth approved the position of Governor General for Leicester as part of the Treaty of Nonsuch. Indeed, the section says that it was later issues of sovereignty that angered her as opposed to his
1711:
which infuriated her". The facts remain that she signed the Treaty referencing the title (however ill-defined) and so the evidence is that the acceptance of the title did not infuriate her. You should really revert back to my more neutral edit or clarify that it was the subsequent level of
1621:
United Provinces" your issue is treated. The whole issue of his title in the Netherlands is a perfect example of Elizabeth's difficult character. I suppose the only thing that was uncontroversial about the entire episode was her boundless fury over Leicester's acceptance of the title
2699:
The comma in "Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester" and similar cases is part of the name. Some writers omit it altogether ("Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester" etc.). Wouldn't this be the better altenative, instead of treating this part of the name as an independent part of the sentence?
1170:
her. It's a very debatable topic, and nobody can be sure, but don't you think it would be too much of a coincidence that they were born on the same day? I think the date should be kept as June 24, but the article needs to mention the question of his birthdate somewhere.
1417:
It is subjective due to the choice of words, as for example in: "The couple paid dearly over the years ...", instances of "obviously", "The reputation of Leicester has suffered immensely under the influence of a libel commonly called Leycester's Commonwealth ..." etc.
1527:
of the Royal Household" is problematic, as historians don't really know when he got it. Dating ranges from c.1570 till 1587! I've given sources where this is discussed in a footnote. For the purposes of this box here, I don't know what to do. Perhaps simply nothing.
2789:, but reading your reply as if you think everything is perfect in this regard, I'll try to simplify what I'm trying to say as briefly as possible, as far as the principle of the thing goes. Do you feel a paragraph like this, for example, would be a good idea?
1222:
I was thinking we should add that it has been suggested he had a son with Elizabeth I. There is some very good evidence to suggest it. Im saying he definatley did or anything, but i think we should mention it somewhere in the article. Any thoughts?
1685:: Elizabeth was in a dilemma, couldn't make up her mind, signed the death warrant and lastly blamed everyone else. Interestingly, in both cases, Elizabeth's fury was sparked principally because she was concerned about her international reputation.
2164:
The article meets all the GA requirements listed above. It is comprehensive beyond the GA's requirement for being broad. The prose is all correct but the quality varies from excellent to ok: while ok, I don't particularly care for structures like
2109:" - this is quite the statement. I think it should be qualified. For example, 'powerful' in terms of what (politically, socially, economically, etc), and according to whom (did contemporaries think this or is this an assessment of historians?).
2608:
I am pleased to see that there are literate and vigilant people looking after this page, although clearly I have offended by contributing to what is no ordinary wikipedia page but personal property. Rest assured I shall stay away from now on.
2464:
succession box, as it stands now, gives the reader no clue about Leicester's nephew. How does that nephew's existence make the box useful if the box does not mention the nephew? Whether the box should, in fact, mention him is another matter.
1663:
I think the key sentence here is (italics): "It was clear that the Earl of Leicester would go to the Netherlands and "be their chief as heretofore was treated of", as he phrased it in August 1585. He was alluding to the recently signed
2716:
a comma, full stop or dash, for example. To separate such a title with commas is far more common than not to, and it makes it easier for the reader to make sense of the text. I recommend against leaving out the commas altogether.
2297:
The article makes absolutely no reference to Leicesters role in crushing the Northern Rebellion of 1569-70. This really ought to be included, since I gather from my limited reading that he was the leader of the queens army.
1580:
Because these things take time; I suspect it will be before too long. Buchraeumer: I'm impressed by the bibliography, but I notice you haven't included Simon Adams' entry on Dudley in the new Oxford Dictionary of National
1517:
2136:
Thanks. These so-tagged National Portrait Gallery images have been allowed in recent GAs; apart from the WMF stance it was argued that the case seemed somehow resolved; if you see a problem perhaps you might ask at
2636:
An official investigation conducted by Henry Sidney, Lord Deputy of Ireland and Leicester's brother-in-law, did not find any indications of foul play but "a disease appropriate to this country ... whereof ... died
1130:
The page still implies Seyss-Inquart as a "successor" to Leicester. This is at best spurious. As above, there was no subsequent English governor of the Netherlands. ] 04:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Steve Allen]
1112:
I removed the infobox, since the two positions were completely separate - one being an English governor for a short period during the 1580's, and the second one being the WWII German occupation governor. The
1084:
But the Dudleys -- Leicester's father -- were not out of favor in the latter part of Henry's reign, which is when it is believed that Robert and Elizabeth first met, along with the other royal children.
934:
815:
918:
811:
2641:
Was Henry Sidney Leicester's brother-in-law, or were Henry Sidney and Leicester's brother-in-law two different people? It's difficult to tell because the rest of the article was poorly punctuated.
2362:
some of them several times. I would support inclusion of these, regardless of succession. If there was no immediate successor (or predecessor), then that information too is important to readers.
1011:
And it claimed that Elizabeth's party was most likely involved in her death, or suicide, however it is well known that we can't always trust Gregory's works historically; they are part fiction...
569:
1791:
Fair enough! Thanks for that and apologies. It just appeared a bit subjective - given that the treaty was only signed shortly before... and there was no citation. Perhaps you could add that?
950:
819:
2752:
back and forth in an article about the Queen's eldest son. Can something be done about that? Seems to me we could pick one of the names and stick to it throughout the text. Am I wrong? --
1058:
At its start, this article suggests that Dudley and Elizabeth met in the Tower of London. Later it states that they were friends from childhood. This inconsistency should be addressed.
1676:." The Dutch would not accept less than Governor-General at Nonsuch, and, typically with Elizabeth, the actual meaning of the title was kept deliberately vague. But it was also the
1353:
The article is substantial and has good pictures and references but has problems with an unencyclopedic subjective tone (the tone of Knowledge articles should be impartial, see
1750:, which Elizabeth saw as a Dutch ploy to embroil her further in her affairs." The footnote gives: Haigh, Christopher. Elizabeth I. Harlow (UK): Longman, (1988) 1998 edition.
779:
2868:
1488:
157:
3015:
2126:
2529:
Subsidiary titles are not included in succession boxes unless the way they passed from person to person differs from the way the main title passed. See, for example:
480:
2283:
2839:
2824:
2808:
2780:
1494:
2458:
2330:
3055:
1473:
1263:
1030:
2473:
2409:
2379:
1329:
I have still expanded the article and made a new heading "Leycester´s commonwealth" as this book was immensely important for Leicester´s long-term reputation.
3045:
3010:
2554:
2524:
2506:
2492:
2435:
2196:
2150:
1593:
1154:
1076:
1020:
769:
1800:
1770:
1721:
1694:
1654:
3050:
2940:
2178:
1461:
1447:
1427:
1412:
1398:
286:
2876:
2725:
2686:
2668:
2264:
2249:
2235:
1607:
3040:
2945:
2920:
3020:
2629:
2580:
1550:
1536:
1506:
1340:
1324:
1299:
1178:
1141:
1073:
1027:
3065:
2426:, was the next holder of the title; it was a new creation, but of course he got this particular earldom in consideration of the family relationship.
845:
391:
2960:
2761:
2610:
2534:
2530:
381:
1284:
1103:
674:
3060:
3035:
3030:
3005:
3000:
1792:
1713:
1646:
1212:
745:
664:
1497:
does not include Leicester, and from that list it seems to be an annual appointment. Perhaps your source is confusing Cambridge with Oxford? -
2935:
1124:
2307:
1574:
1541:
Hmmm, I don't have anything immediately at hand on predecessors/successors for those offices, and I'd say just leave them out for now. Â :-) -
1826:
90:
2975:
1638:
1452:
I didn't take offense. You gave an explanation, problem is, when you have to explain, the language is not clear and should be worked over.
470:
281:
196:
2830:
opinion on that, please. If you feel there is not one instance of that in this article, I stand corrected, but how about the principle. --
3025:
2910:
2355:
1370:
1066:
2653:
1243:
2955:
2925:
2389:
1006:
736:
697:
2995:
2980:
2905:
1089:
2287:
1190:
2915:
2592:
902:
807:
237:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2814:
1845:
2950:
2709:
2046:
238:
2618:
1144:
2990:
2970:
2314:
2219:
840:
802:
559:
446:
2736:
For a non-expert (on English names and titles of nobility) it is rather confusing in the text of this article that the names
849:
2930:
2423:
242:
1629:. Elizabeth's righteous indignation is mentioned in every summary or biography, so we cannot exclude it here in the lead!
2318:
1566:
1204:
1094:
50:
1313:
education, youth, politics, the Kenilworth Festival, theatre, university, etc. in order to give a more rounded picture.
2965:
2542:
2453:
2392:, or forfeiture), the box would make perfect sense. In this case, the box lists none. Does it make any sense to have a
2374:
2279:
1858:
1852:
1377:
357:
246:
2588:
1381:
1239:
1186:
640:
437:
414:
1403:
These two articles were not correctly assessed. If you have more questions, feel free to contact me on my talkpage.
2985:
2900:
2890:
2342:
his peerage title also seems unneccessary. If he was neither preceded nor succeeded by anyone, do we really need a
535:
129:
125:
119:
1584:
The on-line version of this is a pay service, and you might not have access, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.
83:
1354:
1269:
233:
191:
38:
32:
2895:
2872:
2793:
Dudley died in 1588. After various negotiations with family and government Leicester was buried at Westminster.
2731:
2538:
2122:
1945:
1754:
617:
2275:
however this is bad English: "on suspicion to be involved". It should read "on suspicion of being involved."
1358:
348:
309:
2130:
844:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
2321:. Leicester himself was part of the London-based government during the rebellion, he was not in the field.
1197:
631:
592:
166:
728:
526:
503:
1615:
2623:
2292:
2118:
1348:
1050:
Could be. Both his sons were also called Robert, weren't they, so it would be an easy mistake to make.
1886:
1560:
2336:
744:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
639:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
534:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
445:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
356:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2835:
2804:
2757:
1911:
1570:
1208:
1625:, although, it is true (but seldom mentioned), that the same title was earmarked for him in the
2855:
Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester (1532/3 â 1588). Died without issue (son died before him).
2449:
2370:
2303:
1822:
1739:
979:
Just as a matter of interest, what is the source of the evidence for the breast cancer theory?
971:
2820:
2776:
2705:
2664:
2584:
2520:
2502:
2488:
2431:
2326:
2192:
2146:
1766:
1690:
1634:
1532:
1484:
1443:
1394:
1336:
1320:
1280:
1259:
1235:
1217:
1182:
1016:
172:
2167:
Henry Dudley was killed in the battle by a cannonball, before Robert's own eyes, as he said.
1748:
He enraged Elizabeth by accepting from the Dutch States General the post of Governor-General
2576:
2260:
2231:
2187:
Thanks for the pass and for your pains and tips!! I will do something about that sentence.
1603:
1227:
1174:
741:
271:
20:
1290:
This article really needed a thorough rewrite with citations. Thanks for taking it on. -
910:
106:
8:
2614:
2550:
2469:
2405:
2351:
2174:
1841:
1682:
1598:
It's free if your local library subscribes. Log in from home using your library card. --
2831:
2800:
2753:
2138:
1796:
1717:
1650:
1002:, it states that rumours were spread of Lady Amy Dudley being sick with breast cancer.
2768:
2512:
2443:
2364:
2299:
2245:
2215:
1814:
1751:
1665:
1626:
1589:
1457:
1423:
1408:
1366:
1160:
1072:
with the descendants of traitors when the traitor had only been one's grandfather....
42:
2816:
2772:
2721:
2701:
2682:
2660:
2649:
2566:
2516:
2498:
2484:
2427:
2322:
2204:
2188:
2142:
2036:
1762:
1686:
1630:
1528:
1480:
1439:
1390:
1332:
1316:
1276:
1255:
1231:
1203:
but she was ultimately killed by falling down a flight of stairs in her house." --
1012:
999:
225:
2599:
2256:
2227:
1599:
2694:
2546:
2465:
2401:
2388:
any kind of a predecessor or a successor at any point (such as after a vacany,
2347:
2170:
2001:
1837:
1151:
1063:
1003:
340:
2884:
2060:
1582:
1546:
1502:
1295:
1134:
1051:
992:
623:
1707:
I hate to be pedantic but you have not cited evidence that "it was also the
998:
In the fictional book (based on the true story) of "The Virgin's Lover", by
712:
691:
2241:
2211:
1931:
1829:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1761:
copy the sentence in this Dudley article here from the Elizabeth article).
1743:
1585:
1453:
1419:
1404:
1362:
1100:
1086:
2422:
I don't know what you understand under a vacancy, but Leicester's nephew,
2717:
2678:
2645:
2112:
I've changed the wording. He was a kind of regent, but without the title.
1114:
1043:
926:
518:
497:
442:
1376:
Thanks for assessing the article. I wonder, however, why articles like
1099:
Was Leicester really the last governor before the German occupation?--
607:
586:
429:
408:
324:
303:
2744:
are used intermittently for one and the same man. Sort of like using
1121:
113:
2313:
The leaders of the Queen's army were Robert Dudley's brother-in-law
1042:
Are we sure we're not seeing a portrait of his son -- the mapmaker?
1542:
1498:
1291:
980:
973:
894:
245:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
209:
185:
1681:
months earlier. It's a bit as it was later with the execution of
353:
1565:
Very detailed, fun to read....why isnt this a featured article?
1742:
on 10 December 2007, 16:24, the date the article was kept as a
636:
2863:
Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester (1563-1626). His nephew.
1515:
of Cambridge University from 1563-1588, not Vice-Chancellor!
531:
1166:
sources on it, the September 7 date seems much more likely.
942:
2127:
File:Sir Francis Walsingham by John De Critz the Elder.jpg
832:
796:
740:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
2483:
but that's another point)." Perhaps you could explain?
2169:" For a more detailed review, try Peer Review or FAC. -
2107:
John Dudley was now the most powerful adult in England.
1495:
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of Cambridge
1150:
Who the heck are you? Anyway, I second your statement.
1712:
sovereignty desired by the Dutch that infuriated her.
1252:
article, as this would amount to "original research".
112:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
2129:- there is a copyright claim against them but given
718:
635:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
613:
530:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
441:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
352:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
330:
215:
3016:GA-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
2882:
2535:David Cholmondeley, 7th Marquess of Cholmondeley
2531:John Spencer-Churchill, 10th Duke of Marlborough
2785:I'm not that easily confused, nor am I usually
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
3056:European military history task force articles
2867:Knowledge only has one page for them both. â
1827:Talk:Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester/GA1
3046:British military history task force articles
3011:Low-importance University of Oxford articles
2045:(images are tagged and non-free images have
3051:GA-Class European military history articles
2941:Mid-importance biography (peerage) articles
1389:!), other than perhaps adding new aspects.
3041:GA-Class British military history articles
2946:Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
2921:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in People
2497:I meant Surtsicna's edit (edit conflict).
1672:as "governor-general" for the Netherlands
754:Knowledge:WikiProject University of Oxford
3021:WikiProject University of Oxford articles
2659:Sir Henry Sidney was his brother-in-law.
757:Template:WikiProject University of Oxford
3066:Early Modern warfare task force articles
2133:I will accept them as correctly tagged.
1516:
1304:Thank you for your encouraging response!
838:This article is within the scope of the
2961:Low-importance England-related articles
1310:"Youth", and added facts about Dudley´s
1117:didn't have governor's in between then.
3061:GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
3036:Military biography work group articles
3031:GA-Class biography (military) articles
3006:GA-Class University of Oxford articles
3001:Low-importance London-related articles
2883:
2545:, etc. That is the standard practice.
2315:Henry Hastings, 3rd Earl of Huntingdon
858:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
848:. To use this banner, please see the
2936:GA-Class biography (peerage) articles
2851:There seems be two different people:
861:Template:WikiProject Military history
2424:Robert Sidney, 1st Earl of Leicester
1511:I confused it myself, sorry! He was
1474:Help for "Academic Offices" welcome!
935:European military history task force
734:This article is within the scope of
629:This article is within the scope of
524:This article is within the scope of
435:This article is within the scope of
346:This article is within the scope of
231:This article is within the scope of
143:
141:
137:
27:Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester
2976:Low-importance East Anglia articles
2319:Ambrose Dudley, 3rd Earl of Warwick
919:British military history task force
171:It is of interest to the following
13:
3026:GA-Class military history articles
2911:Knowledge vital articles in People
2543:Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell
2040:, where possible and appropriate.
1378:Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex
1062:They were friends from childhood.
941:
925:
909:
893:
282:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage
270:
14:
3077:
2956:GA-Class England-related articles
2926:GA-Class vital articles in People
1859:Knowledge:What is a good article?
1382:William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley
1307:I have now made a further heading
455:Knowledge:WikiProject East Anglia
41:. If you can improve it further,
2996:GA-Class London-related articles
2981:WikiProject East Anglia articles
2906:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
2089:
2066:
2052:
2023:
2007:
1986:
1976:
1951:
1937:
1923:
1892:
1878:
1746:(undeservedly, if you ask me): "
831:
795:
737:WikiProject University of Oxford
721:
711:
690:
616:
606:
585:
517:
496:
458:Template:WikiProject East Anglia
428:
407:
333:
323:
302:
218:
208:
184:
151:
142:
105:
19:
2916:GA-Class level-5 vital articles
1757:. p. 137. (Incidentally, I did
951:Early Modern warfare task force
774:This article has been rated as
669:This article has been rated as
564:This article has been rated as
475:This article has been rated as
386:This article has been rated as
255:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
2951:WikiProject Biography articles
2539:John Spencer, 8th Earl Spencer
2123:File:Nicholas Hilliard 005.jpg
2105:In "Education and marriage", "
258:Template:WikiProject Biography
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
2991:Low-importance Latin articles
2971:GA-Class East Anglia articles
2288:23:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
2265:05:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2250:23:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
2236:19:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
1674:had only been vaguely defined
1341:12:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
1325:07:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
1300:16:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
1285:12:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
1264:15:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
903:Military biography task force
760:University of Oxford articles
748:and see a list of open tasks.
643:and see a list of open tasks.
538:and see a list of open tasks.
449:and see a list of open tasks.
366:Knowledge:WikiProject England
360:and see a list of open tasks.
279:This article is supported by
2593:12:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
2220:18:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
2197:16:20, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
2179:15:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
2151:17:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
2117:Are these images necessary:
2090:
2067:
2053:
2024:
2008:
1987:
1977:
1952:
1938:
1924:
1893:
1879:
1846:04:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
1244:09:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
1191:12:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
841:Military history WikiProject
649:Knowledge:WikiProject London
369:Template:WikiProject England
243:contribute to the discussion
7:
2931:GA-Class biography articles
2630:Love affairs and remarriage
2356:17:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
1801:23:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
1771:11:49, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
1722:10:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
1695:17:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1655:15:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1639:14:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1522:A Cambridge Alumni Database
1518:"Dudley, Robert (DDLY564R)"
1145:16:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
1140:this isn't replied to soon.
1095:Governor of the Netherlands
1077:16:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
1031:16:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
729:University of Oxford portal
652:Template:WikiProject London
544:Knowledge:WikiProject Latin
10:
3082:
2119:File:Edward VI swagger.jpg
1594:19:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
1524:. University of Cambridge.
1462:18:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1448:18:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1428:12:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1413:12:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1399:11:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1371:23:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
1104:03:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
1090:01:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
780:project's importance scale
675:project's importance scale
547:Template:WikiProject Latin
481:project's importance scale
392:project's importance scale
2966:WikiProject England pages
2877:02:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
2840:20:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
2825:19:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
2809:18:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
2781:17:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
2762:16:41, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
2726:12:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
2710:11:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
2687:12:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
2669:11:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
2654:11:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
2619:10:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
2331:12:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
2308:12:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1213:18:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1155:13:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
1125:03:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
1067:13:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
1046:03:33, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
1007:13:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
995:01:03, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
949:
933:
917:
901:
876:
872:
864:military history articles
826:
773:
706:
668:
601:
563:
512:
474:
423:
385:
318:
278:
203:
179:
65:
61:
2555:23:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2525:23:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2507:22:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2493:22:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2474:23:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2459:22:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2436:22:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2410:18:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
2380:17:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
1575:17:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
1551:02:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
1537:14:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
1507:02:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
1489:22:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
1054:01:05, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
1021:06:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
983:12:38 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
372:England-related articles
2986:GA-Class Latin articles
2901:GA-Class vital articles
2891:Knowledge good articles
2131:The_position of the WMF
1868:reasonably well written
1608:01:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
1435:Leycesters Commonwealth
1270:Practically New Article
877:Associated task forces:
655:London-related articles
438:WikiProject East Anglia
2732:Name confusion in text
2639:
2059:(appropriate use with
1740:Elizabeth I of England
1670:position and authority
1387:really unencyclopaedic
946:
930:
914:
898:
275:
197:Peerage and Baronetage
2896:History good articles
2634:
2511:I totally agree with
2034:It is illustrated by
2002:neutral point of view
1966:broad in its coverage
1355:Neutral point of view
945:
929:
913:
897:
274:
234:WikiProject Biography
158:level-5 vital article
39:good article criteria
33:History good articles
2869:Talk about confusing
1198:Death of Amy Robsart
751:University of Oxford
742:University of Oxford
698:University of Oxford
461:East Anglia articles
91:Good article nominee
2813:For the principle:
2396:box if there is no
2047:fair use rationales
1683:Mary Queen of Scots
1026:changes to history.
989:Elizabeth the Queen
953:(c. 1500 â c. 1800)
349:WikiProject England
2624:One person or two?
2293:Northern Rebellion
2139:User talk:Awadewit
1907:factually accurate
1380:, and especially,
1349:Assessment comment
947:
931:
915:
899:
846:list of open tasks
632:WikiProject London
276:
261:biography articles
167:content assessment
66:Article milestones
2787:imperfectly aware
2596:
2579:comment added by
2061:suitable captions
1666:Treaty of Nonsuch
1627:Treaty of Nonsuch
1561:Excellent Article
1247:
1230:comment added by
1194:
1177:comment added by
969:
968:
965:
964:
961:
960:
957:
956:
850:full instructions
790:
789:
786:
785:
685:
684:
681:
680:
580:
579:
576:
575:
527:WikiProject Latin
491:
490:
487:
486:
402:
401:
398:
397:
297:
296:
293:
292:
136:
135:
130:September 4, 2024
126:September 4, 2023
100:
99:
57:
3073:
2595:
2573:
2457:
2446:
2378:
2367:
2337:Succession boxes
2317:and his brother
2093:
2092:
2070:
2069:
2056:
2055:
2027:
2026:
2011:
2010:
1990:
1989:
1980:
1979:
1955:
1954:
1941:
1940:
1932:reliable sources
1927:
1926:
1896:
1895:
1882:
1881:
1623:Governor-General
1616:Elizabeth's fury
1525:
1246:
1224:
1193:
1171:
1000:Philippa Gregory
884:
874:
873:
866:
865:
862:
859:
856:
855:Military history
835:
828:
827:
822:
803:Military history
799:
792:
791:
762:
761:
758:
755:
752:
731:
726:
725:
724:
715:
708:
707:
702:
694:
687:
686:
657:
656:
653:
650:
647:
626:
621:
620:
610:
603:
602:
597:
589:
582:
581:
570:importance scale
552:
551:
548:
545:
542:
521:
514:
513:
508:
500:
493:
492:
463:
462:
459:
456:
453:
432:
425:
424:
419:
411:
404:
403:
374:
373:
370:
367:
364:
343:
338:
337:
336:
327:
320:
319:
314:
306:
299:
298:
263:
262:
259:
256:
253:
239:join the project
228:
226:Biography portal
223:
222:
221:
212:
205:
204:
199:
188:
181:
180:
164:
155:
154:
147:
146:
145:
138:
109:
86:
84:January 20, 2010
63:
62:
46:
23:
16:
15:
3081:
3080:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3072:
3071:
3070:
2881:
2880:
2734:
2697:
2626:
2602:
2574:
2569:
2447:
2442:
2400:to illustrate?
2368:
2363:
2339:
2295:
2207:
1999:It follows the
1973:(major aspects)
1821:This review is
1817:
1668:, in which his
1618:
1563:
1476:
1351:
1272:
1225:
1220:
1200:
1172:
1163:
1137:
1097:
977:
882:
863:
860:
857:
854:
853:
805:
759:
756:
753:
750:
749:
727:
722:
720:
700:
654:
651:
648:
645:
644:
622:
615:
595:
549:
546:
543:
540:
539:
506:
460:
457:
454:
451:
450:
417:
371:
368:
365:
362:
361:
339:
334:
332:
312:
260:
257:
254:
251:
250:
224:
219:
217:
194:
165:on Knowledge's
162:
152:
82:
12:
11:
5:
3079:
3069:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2865:
2864:
2857:
2856:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2733:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2696:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2672:
2671:
2625:
2622:
2601:
2598:
2568:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2509:
2495:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2338:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2294:
2291:
2277:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2206:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2182:
2181:
2161:
2160:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2102:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2016:
2015:
2014:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1930:(citations to
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1863:
1862:
1832:
1831:
1816:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1658:
1657:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1415:
1350:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1330:
1327:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1253:
1219:
1216:
1199:
1196:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1119:
1118:
1108:
1096:
1093:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1056:
1055:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
976:
970:
967:
966:
963:
962:
959:
958:
955:
954:
948:
938:
937:
932:
922:
921:
916:
906:
905:
900:
890:
889:
887:
885:
879:
878:
870:
869:
867:
836:
824:
823:
800:
788:
787:
784:
783:
776:Low-importance
772:
766:
765:
763:
746:the discussion
733:
732:
716:
704:
703:
701:Lowâimportance
695:
683:
682:
679:
678:
671:Low-importance
667:
661:
660:
658:
641:the discussion
628:
627:
611:
599:
598:
596:Lowâimportance
590:
578:
577:
574:
573:
566:Low-importance
562:
556:
555:
553:
550:Latin articles
536:the discussion
522:
510:
509:
507:Lowâimportance
501:
489:
488:
485:
484:
477:Low-importance
473:
467:
466:
464:
447:the discussion
433:
421:
420:
418:Lowâimportance
412:
400:
399:
396:
395:
388:Low-importance
384:
378:
377:
375:
358:the discussion
345:
344:
341:England portal
328:
316:
315:
313:Lowâimportance
307:
295:
294:
291:
290:
287:Mid-importance
277:
267:
266:
264:
230:
229:
213:
201:
200:
189:
177:
176:
170:
148:
134:
133:
120:On this day...
110:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3078:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2888:
2886:
2879:
2878:
2874:
2870:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2841:
2837:
2833:
2832:SergeWoodzing
2828:
2827:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2815:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2801:SergeWoodzing
2798:
2794:
2791:
2790:
2788:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2754:SergeWoodzing
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2642:
2638:
2633:
2631:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2606:
2597:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2481:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2455:
2451:
2445:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2376:
2372:
2366:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2290:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2274:
2273:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2141:for clarity.
2140:
2135:
2134:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2111:
2110:
2108:
2104:
2103:
2099:
2098:
2087:
2084:
2083:
2081:
2078:
2072:
2071:
2064:
2062:
2050:
2048:
2042:
2041:
2039:
2038:
2033:
2029:
2028:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2012:
2005:
2003:
1998:
1992:
1991:
1984:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1967:
1963:
1957:
1956:
1949:
1947:
1935:
1933:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1914:
1913:
1908:
1904:
1898:
1897:
1890:
1888:
1876:
1872:
1871:
1869:
1865:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1836:
1830:
1828:
1824:
1819:
1818:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1738:I quote from
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:77.250.25.165
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1523:
1519:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1416:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1359:peacock terms
1356:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1218:Arthur Dudley
1215:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:72.68.227.212
1195:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1167:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1132:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1078:
1075:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1032:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
994:
990:
987:According to
986:
985:
984:
982:
975:
952:
944:
940:
939:
936:
928:
924:
923:
920:
912:
908:
907:
904:
896:
892:
891:
888:
886:
881:
880:
875:
871:
868:
851:
847:
843:
842:
837:
834:
830:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
804:
801:
798:
794:
793:
781:
777:
771:
768:
767:
764:
747:
743:
739:
738:
730:
719:
717:
714:
710:
709:
705:
699:
696:
693:
689:
688:
676:
672:
666:
663:
662:
659:
642:
638:
634:
633:
625:
624:London portal
619:
614:
612:
609:
605:
604:
600:
594:
591:
588:
584:
583:
571:
567:
561:
558:
557:
554:
537:
533:
529:
528:
523:
520:
516:
515:
511:
505:
502:
499:
495:
494:
482:
478:
472:
469:
468:
465:
448:
444:
440:
439:
434:
431:
427:
426:
422:
416:
413:
410:
406:
405:
393:
389:
383:
380:
379:
376:
359:
355:
351:
350:
342:
331:
329:
326:
322:
321:
317:
311:
308:
305:
301:
300:
288:
285:(assessed as
284:
283:
273:
269:
268:
265:
248:
247:documentation
244:
240:
236:
235:
227:
216:
214:
211:
207:
206:
202:
198:
193:
190:
187:
183:
182:
178:
174:
168:
160:
159:
149:
140:
139:
131:
127:
123:
121:
115:
111:
108:
104:
103:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2866:
2858:
2850:
2792:
2786:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2737:
2735:
2698:
2643:
2640:
2635:
2627:
2607:
2603:
2575:â Preceding
2570:
2513:Wilhelm Meis
2444:Wilhelm Meis
2397:
2393:
2385:
2365:Wilhelm Meis
2343:
2340:
2300:Spidergareth
2296:
2280:4.249.63.202
2278:
2208:
2166:
2106:
2085:
2079:
2058:
2044:
2035:
2019:
2000:
1982:
1972:
1965:
1943:
1929:
1920:(references)
1919:
1910:
1906:
1884:
1874:
1867:
1851:
1834:
1833:
1820:
1758:
1747:
1708:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1622:
1619:
1564:
1521:
1513:High Steward
1512:
1477:
1434:
1386:
1352:
1273:
1221:
1201:
1173:â Preceding
1168:
1164:
1138:
1128:
1120:
1107:
1098:
1083:
1057:
1041:
988:
978:
839:
820:Early Modern
775:
735:
670:
630:
565:
525:
476:
436:
387:
347:
280:
232:
173:WikiProjects
156:
117:
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
2817:Buchraeumer
2773:Buchraeumer
2702:Buchraeumer
2661:Buchraeumer
2632:, it says:
2581:BRCScriptor
2517:Buchraeumer
2499:Buchraeumer
2485:Buchraeumer
2441:successor.
2428:Buchraeumer
2323:Buchraeumer
2189:Buchraeumer
2143:Buchraeumer
1823:transcluded
1763:Buchraeumer
1687:Buchraeumer
1631:Buchraeumer
1529:Buchraeumer
1481:Buchraeumer
1440:Buchraeumer
1391:Buchraeumer
1357:) and many
1333:Buchraeumer
1317:Buchraeumer
1277:Buchraeumer
1256:Buchraeumer
1232:Chloe2kaii7
1226:âPreceding
1179:BRCScriptor
1142:68.79.11.47
1115:Netherlands
1074:68.79.11.47
1028:68.79.11.47
1013:Sweetlife31
972:Comment by
452:East Anglia
443:East Anglia
415:East Anglia
2885:Categories
2769:WP:SURNAME
2454:â Beiträge
2398:succession
2394:succession
2375:â Beiträge
2344:succession
2159:Conclusion
1912:verifiable
1755:0582437547
1600:Doris Kami
1581:Biography.
124:column on
37:under the
2742:Leicester
2611:Sjwells53
2547:Surtsicna
2466:Surtsicna
2450:â Diskuss
2402:Surtsicna
2384:If there
2371:â Diskuss
2348:Surtsicna
2086:Pass/Fail
1983:(focused)
1835:Reviewer:
1815:GA Review
1161:Birthdate
808:Biography
252:Biography
192:Biography
161:is rated
114:Main Page
2677:Thanks.
2644:Thanks.
2589:contribs
2577:unsigned
2567:Wording?
2390:abeyancy
2205:Language
1793:Doooglas
1714:Doooglas
1647:Doooglas
1240:contribs
1228:unsigned
1187:contribs
1175:unsigned
1052:Onebyone
993:Onebyone
816:European
163:GA-class
51:reassess
2746:Charles
2600:Gallery
2242:Hekerui
2212:Hekerui
2171:maclean
2080:Overall
1875:(prose)
1838:maclean
1586:Lampman
1454:Hekerui
1420:Hekerui
1405:Hekerui
1363:Hekerui
1152:Scotteh
1101:Anglius
1087:Hiraeth
1064:Scotteh
1004:Scotteh
812:British
778:on the
673:on the
568:on the
479:on the
390:on the
363:England
354:England
310:England
116:in the
74:Process
2738:Dudley
2718:Inglok
2695:Syntax
2679:Inglok
2646:Inglok
2628:Under
2037:images
2020:stable
2018:It is
2004:policy
1964:It is
1905:It is
1866:It is
1855:review
1044:Sparky
646:London
637:London
593:London
169:scale.
128:, and
96:Listed
77:Result
2750:Wales
2637:many"
2346:box?
2240:QED.
2100:Notes
1857:(see
1825:from
1744:WP:FA
1709:title
1678:title
1135:Baaah
541:Latin
532:Latin
504:Latin
150:This
2873:talk
2859:and
2836:talk
2821:talk
2805:talk
2799:? --
2777:talk
2767:see
2758:talk
2748:and
2740:and
2722:talk
2706:talk
2683:talk
2665:talk
2650:talk
2615:talk
2585:talk
2551:talk
2521:talk
2503:talk
2489:talk
2470:talk
2432:talk
2406:talk
2352:talk
2327:talk
2304:talk
2284:talk
2261:talk
2257:Dave
2246:talk
2232:talk
2228:Dave
2216:talk
2193:talk
2175:talk
2147:talk
1909:and
1842:talk
1797:talk
1767:talk
1752:ISBN
1718:talk
1691:talk
1651:talk
1635:talk
1604:talk
1590:talk
1571:talk
1547:talk
1533:talk
1503:talk
1485:talk
1458:talk
1444:talk
1424:talk
1409:talk
1395:talk
1367:talk
1337:talk
1321:talk
1296:talk
1281:talk
1260:talk
1236:talk
1209:talk
1183:talk
1122:Arun
1017:talk
241:and
71:Date
2386:was
1887:MoS
1759:not
1543:PKM
1499:PKM
1292:PKM
981:Deb
974:Deb
770:Low
665:Low
560:Low
471:Low
382:Low
2887::
2875:)
2838:)
2823:)
2807:)
2779:)
2760:)
2724:)
2708:)
2685:)
2667:)
2652:)
2617:)
2591:)
2587:â˘
2553:)
2541:;
2537:;
2533:;
2523:)
2515:.
2505:)
2491:)
2472:)
2452:|
2434:)
2408:)
2373:|
2354:)
2329:)
2306:)
2286:)
2263:)
2248:)
2234:)
2218:)
2195:)
2177:)
2149:)
2125:,
2121:,
2088::
2082::
2065::
2057:b
2051::
2043:a
2022:.
2006:.
1985::
1981:b
1975::
1971:a
1968:.
1950::
1946:OR
1942:c
1936::
1928:b
1922::
1918:a
1915:.
1891::
1883:b
1877::
1873:a
1870:.
1853:GA
1844:)
1799:)
1769:)
1720:)
1693:)
1653:)
1637:)
1606:)
1592:)
1573:)
1549:)
1535:)
1520:.
1505:)
1487:)
1460:)
1446:)
1426:)
1411:)
1397:)
1369:)
1361:.
1339:)
1323:)
1298:)
1283:)
1262:)
1242:)
1238:â˘
1211:)
1189:)
1185:â˘
1085:--
1019:)
883:/
818:/
814:/
810:/
806::
289:).
195::
54:it
45:.
2871:(
2834:(
2819:(
2803:(
2775:(
2756:(
2720:(
2704:(
2681:(
2663:(
2648:(
2613:(
2583:(
2549:(
2519:(
2501:(
2487:(
2468:(
2456:)
2448:(
2430:(
2404:(
2377:)
2369:(
2350:(
2325:(
2302:(
2282:(
2259:(
2244:(
2230:(
2214:(
2191:(
2173:(
2165:"
2145:(
2063:)
2049:)
1948:)
1944:(
1934:)
1889:)
1885:(
1861:)
1840:(
1795:(
1765:(
1716:(
1689:(
1649:(
1633:(
1602:(
1588:(
1569:(
1545:(
1531:(
1501:(
1483:(
1456:(
1442:(
1422:(
1407:(
1393:(
1365:(
1335:(
1319:(
1294:(
1279:(
1258:(
1234:(
1207:(
1181:(
1015:(
852:.
782:.
677:.
572:.
483:.
394:.
249:.
175::
132:.
122:"
118:"
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.