Knowledge

Talk:Markus Persson/Archive 2

Source 📝

668:
popular posts. For instance when Persson was implementing a new moon texture the community was literally split in half whether it should be round or square. I'm sure this story is on a Minecraft page somewhere, but as far as controversies go, this is probably the biggest of them all. An outstanding amount of people discussed these changes. Furthermore, everyone has the right to an opinion (even if it's a bad one). If you read Persson's personal blog there are surely many discussion topics that many people would disagree with. No one thought to choose a controversial programming topic? Such as whether or not voxel based games would become a future technology? That was a heated discussion in the day. The page doesn't describe Persson's technological contributions to computer programming either. Nor does the page describe his education. Are Knowledge writers seriously this politically biased to choose a one sentence twitter post that doesn't describe why he believes what he does? It doesn't describe the limits of his opinion. Where it may apply, or where it may not. Persson seems to be a reasonable man that changes his opinions if someone has a wise and thoughtful argument. It's obvious he feels that the (I dunno what to call it) "anti-white" movement? has some flaws. Are you to suppose that this movement has done "nothing wrong"? Or better yet, have they done "everything right" and therefore voids all criticism? This is important as to properly establish a full story. Perhaps controversy is properly within scope, but it feels like each section of the whole article tells 0.1% of his story. Picking on his twitter rather than his blog where he explains his opinions in detail is a cowardly way to write articles. In 2014 this page explained a controversy about Electronic Arts. If that topic isn't suitable for this page now. Was it ever suitable? If not, then how is the controversy section ever suitable? "Starting around 2017, Persson began receiving criticism for political and social opinions he expressed on Twitter" This is wholly incorrect. Persson has been discussing with his fans on his blog and twitter since Minecraft development began (I didn't start following him until about infdev so I don't know about before then). He gave many political, technological, and religious opinions over the years that many disagree with. Or is the author assuming that only criticism from the "media" matters? Nobody cares about the media's opinion. They never followed Persson throughout the development of his game. They don't have the experience to have an opinion in these matters. Nor did the person who wrote that sentence know the "historical background".
780:
a source exists doesn't warrant its use in an article. Read Bill Maher's wiki too. His article contains a politics section where his political beliefs are explained. For instance "He has referred to himself as a "9/11 liberal", noting that his formerly liberal view of Islam changed as a result of the attacks on September 11, 2001, and he differentiates himself from liberals of the opinion that all religions are alike." This article doesn't just state something racist that Bill said. It explains his political view, and why he believes it. Persson's article doesn't have an argument in the controversies section. It's not explaining Persson's political opinion and why it's good or bad. it's just stating something he said. If the article said "Persson believes X because of X reason" then it would warrant the opposing opinion of his critics. Furthermore, the following quotations have no sources: "made up metric." "tone-deaf" and "ignorant". If I wrote that in a paper I'd be thrown out of my university for plagiarism. It seems the main issue for this article is that few sources exist that explain Persson and his political beliefs. The corpus for that is mainly his blog and twitter. Knowledge's rules do state that "...questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves..." (including activities). I think it would be acceptable to select a few interesting things about Persson's beliefs via his blog so that readers could gain an understanding of him, rather than just "Here's a couple off-coloured things that he said". Then you'll have created a substantiated vision and argument of who he is.
672:
0x10c. It describes the event in an unbiased manner and moves on (As it should). If anything, this page should criticize Microsoft for not recognizing the difference between personal opinion and business. To an extent: Minecraft was only popular during development due to the excitement of following the developers in the adventure of discovery. Notch gathered a community around himself. It's obvious that Microsoft only cares about the monetary value of Minecraft and never understood the relation between Notch and his community. Without Notch there is no Minecraft. Obviously he chose to leave Mojang before Microsoft decided to remove his name from the game. I'm simply trying to describe that this article barely touches the surface and can ask much deeper questions. How did Notch create and effect his community? How did he become popular? Do people like his social media personality? How did people challenge Persson's opinions during development (where it actually mattered) compared to now post-development. How did Notch's "wackyness" or creative ideas effect his platform? When I read a Biography about Chopin it described who he was as a person. It brought Chopin's story to life. Persson's story is full of interesting, creative, and fun details. Evidence from his blog: "and it absolutely exploded. Because I enjoy talking to the players and community, and possibly because I will gladly share my opinions on things"
1263:
a tweet which includes a screenshot of the quote. The tweet appears to be from a twitter user of no particular note. It received little attention (10 likes) and no verification. This does not seem like a trustworthy source. I've tried to find an archived version of Notch's tweet but have only found other links to the tweet in question. From WP:RS/QUOTE: "To ensure accuracy, the text of quoted material is best taken from (and cited to) the original source being quoted. If this is not possible, then the text may be taken from a reliable secondary source (ideally one that includes a citation to the original).". The relevant part being "a reliable secondary source". Other (controversial) tweets of this, e.g. "It's OK to be white", are sourced with an article either linking to the tweet or an archive of the tweet, but this one in particular fails to meet this standard. I propose replacing the reference with an archive of the tweet or removing it if one cannot be found. In the form of a "please change X to Y": Please change "Later in June 2017, he tweeted in support of a heterosexual pride day, calling opponents to the idea "cunts" and stating that they "deserve to be shot"." to "", or please change the source for the aforementioned sentence to a reference to the tweet in question.
739:
okay to be white” so what? Why should the reader of this wiki care? I think this is totally out of the articles scope. This is not an article on racism or liberal politics. Why should anyone care about Persson’s opinion about anything? The reason the voxel controversy was so good was because he provided a logical and reasonable explanation into why he thought voxel-based games would never become the future. This is a meaningless one sentence twitter post that could be interpreted in a variety of ways.
1446: 31: 735:
Social media is not a place for children. Nor is it the official Mojang or Minecraft twitter accounts. It’s his personal twitter account. If you caught your favourite children’s show actor in a bar swearing, you’d be surprised. But that actor has the right to speak his mind when he is not representing the show. These twitter posts were made two years after Persson left Mojang. How long does he represent the game that he no longer represents?
1390: 1232: 1135: 875: 429: 1473: 1302: 1201: 549: 1177:{{cite web|url=http://notch.tumblr.com/post/113753678/turning-30-is-scary|title=Turning 30 is scary.|work=Tumblr|first=Markus|last=Persson|date=29 May 2009|access-date=22 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101212015514/http://notch.tumblr.com/post/113753678/turning-30-is-scary|archive-date=12 December 2010|url-status= 776:
explains what a splash screen is. Technically it's a menu screen not a splash screen, but it's accurate enough. "Loading screen" is simply incorrect. A menu screen is not a loading screen. Even putting "from the game's menu" is sufficiently accurate. I doubt readers care about the details of the "splash text" and how it works.
1361:
Ars Technica says "In 2017, he tweeted, "If you're against the concept of a #HeterosexualPrideDay, you're a complete fucking cunt and deserve to be shot," though this, too, was subsequently deleted." Ars Technica is a reliable source, and we can take their word that that was the text of the original
1262:
The quote: "he tweeted in support of a heterosexual pride day, calling opponents to the idea "cunts" and stating that they "deserve to be shot"." from the "Controversies" section of this page does not seem to have a adequate source. The provided reference is to a news article which in turn references
779:
I still question what you're trying to tell the reader with the controversy section. The first and second paragraph only have one source each which is not "multiple sources" as you suggest. Which I believe are different issues and do not relate to each other; they are not the same event. Just because
742:
Read the Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump wiki-page. They are known for actually saying racist and controversial things every time their mouth opens. Neither page has a “controversies” section. Bill O’Reilly’s page explains his political views before the negative aspects of those views. Persson isn’t a
728:
Furthermore, it’s only conjecture that those lines were removed for political reasons. Maybe they wanted less text. Or perhaps they removed it because Persson doesn’t work on the game anymore. “Made by Notch” Well is it made by Notch anymore? There are multiple reasonable conclusions for this removal.
512:
Since the article is locked, I thought I should say this here. In the "controversies" section of this article, there is a grammatically incorrect sentence in the second paragraph, part of which is quoted here: "Persson was not invited to part of the event." This should either say "to be part of" or
1327:
Hey, this is certainly an improvement, but unfortunately there is still no definitive source. It seems likely that the Arcs Technica article is referencing the tweet made by the random twitter user. I think that a source for this claim should be held to the same standards as the other tweets sourced
734:
These sources do not reliably present the facts. Both articles are biased. They tell the reader what to believe rather than presenting their information and letting the reader come to their own conclusions. For instance, “a tweet that was definitely not appropriate for the game’s many younger fans”.
580:
Cited source for the phrase "Microsoft eventually dissociated from Persson following comments on his Twitter account which faced criticism for accusations of being racist, homophobic, and sexist." does not include language "accusations of being racist, homophobic, and sexist." The op-ed blog article
727:
Persson has never had his name or his handle on any of the loading screens. Second, we do not know if it was Microsoft or Jeb or dinnerbone that removed Notch’s handle from the SPLASH text file. That’s the little yellow text that shows up under the title in the main menu. It’s called “splash text”.
273:
His name removal from Minecraft needs to be on this page; it is a notable change and got significant coverage. But there is no other reasonable place to put it. The only thing we can add is something like "While Microsoft did not comment on this change, several journalists considered it as response
738:
And finally, what are you trying to tell the reader with the political section? Like I said, there’s many better controversies we could use. There’s no inherent value to the second paragraph. Sweden is one of the most liberal societies, open to pretty much anything. He made a tweet that said “It’s
584:
Change "Microsoft eventually dissociated from Persson following comments on his Twitter account which faced criticism for accusations of being racist, homophobic, and sexist." to "Microsoft eventually dissociated from Persson following controversial comments on his Twitter account which he posted
671:
If anything the controversy section tells readers what to believe about the negative side of Persson. This article doesn't quote another article that called Persson "lazy" when he didn't provide Minecraft updates fast enough. It doesn't call him "lazy" when he no longer had the effort to finish
86:
Microsoft made no comment over the removal of the splash text. Mojang just removed the splash text with no further comment. The source listed speculates about the reason, admitting Microsoft had not responded to it. It is pure speculation to include this information in this section implying the
775:
Thanks! I read the source for the "from the game's loading screens" statement. Nowhere does the source state that Persson's name was removed from the loading screen. It specifically says "the game’s splash screens have removed all mention of Minecraft’s creator Markus “Notch” Persson." Then it
667:
Can I ask the point of having any controversies on Persson's wiki? The ones listed are not substantial at all. If the number of people viewing or complaining about something is the tool of measurement for being considered than surely those listed aren't even among the top 10% of Persson's most
222:
It's not speculative, given the way it was reported. It happened shortly after Notch's comments, and while we are not saying "they were removed because of his comments", we are letting the timing of events, coupled with how the media reported on that, speak for itself.
760:
I've removed the "starting in 2017", both as a valid "unsupported claim" and an unnecessity. As to the rest, I'm not going to argue about "the sources are biased". They are reliable sources in the eyes of Knowledge that have been repeatedly discussed and vetted. --
342:
It would fit in that section if Mojang/Microsoft has given a reason for the removal; they haven't, so conclusions shouldn't be made from it. It isn't some obscure thing, but it's just unsubstantiated gossip until reasoning is given (which won't happen).
941:
So I was wondering if the last sentence of the first paragraph could be considered original research or opinion. I mean, it's obvious that those are the things that he is best known for, but I'm new to Knowledge and don't quite know the rules yet.
1015:
I think that there should be some article or something like that, maybe a mini-biography online or perhaps, if he has one, a personal website's mini-autobiography (this may not be suitable considering that it is Persson's description of himself)?
633: 460:
Citations needed for the following phrase: "Microsoft eventually dissociated from Persson following comments on Persson's Twitter account which faced criticism for accusations of being racist, transphobic, homophobic, and sexist."
324:
Yes, it actually does, if we are then subsequently talking about MS distancing itself from Notch at the 10th anniversary event. This is not some obscure thing covered by a few sources, and it clearly fits in the "story".
1110:
which predates the Notch controversy and (other than a brief allusion to "medieval serfs") does not explicitly compare the villagers to any specific real-life group of people, or stereotype thereof.
657: 1102:
covering this? The only allegations of anti-Semitism within the game itself I've been able to find are all speculation on social media, which generally isn't going to cut it, especially when
1222: 743:
TV personality, he’s just some guy that accidentally made a popular video game. Who cares that he like many other people state their opinions on a platform that encourages opinions?
1354: 1292: 140:
We've reached out to Microsoft for a statement as to why references to Notch have been removed. It's unclear if this decision is related to his controversial comments.
788: 751: 686: 911: 856: 865: 581:
only states "Notch has gained notoriety in recent times for the controversial and inflammatory tweets he's posted regarding race and gender, among other topics."
1339: 1277: 915: 1216: 469: 1192: 419: 1438: 1125: 1045: 575: 473: 1335: 1273: 604: 520: 121:
Nearly every source that reported on the splash text removal associated with Notch's comments. It fits there even if we don't express the reason. --
1119: 1025: 999: 1038:
On the side bar it says that he is the one who created Mojang, even though he was just a Co-creator. We should change "created" to "co-created"
930: 792: 770: 755: 706: 569: 1380: 592: 501: 393: 1374: 1321: 175:
The content didn't specify why it was done, just that it was done. Sources clearly have speculated why, but we're not casting that stone. --
627: 291:
It doesn't "need" to be on the page, though I'd agree that an additional comment would need to be there if this were to remain on the page.
831: 217: 184: 371: 337: 319: 286: 268: 235: 170: 133: 1495: 1465: 376:
What section should it be placed in then? There is no better section unless we make another one just for a single sentence going against
1068:
There have been allegations of the villagers in Minecraft being an antisemitic portrayal of Jewish people, which should be added to the
539: 1106:
to give to a particular controversy. The only news article I found about any sort of politics surrounding Minecraft villagers was
990:? Note that the latter has a citation that directly supports this claim, which makes it neither original research nor an opinion. 1309:
I have found a RS that has the quote directly (not showing the tweet but acknowledging it was deleted) that supports the quote --
1057: 1107: 906:
Citation needed for nationality being "Naturalized American" and the quote "is a Swedish-born American" in the first paragraph.
1091: 984:
Microsoft eventually dissociated from Persson following controversial comments regarding topics such as race and gender on his
957: 690: 115: 860: 1087: 848: 784: 747: 682: 1434: 961: 799:
I have corrected this information. "Microsoft" didn't remove it; they have no say in the development of Minecraft. And it
1184: 1053: 907: 852: 240:
Then it shouldn't be on the page. Placing this in that section gives the implication that it was caused by his opinions.
1343: 1281: 507: 638:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
528: 465: 1259:
This is my first Knowledge edit (request), so I apologize if I've messed up the formatting or something similar.
1212: 1430: 824: 623: 495: 364: 312: 261: 210: 163: 108: 600: 59: 953: 653: 642: 697:
Sections is warranted and due, as multiple reliable secondary sources have covered the controversies. --
74: 1208: 1083: 1021: 38: 189:
It's being placed in the "Controversy over opinions" section, which why is this would be speculative.
1049: 1033: 1426: 1422: 1396: 1238: 1188: 1141: 881: 649: 435: 524: 1063: 1017: 949: 662: 803:
the menu screen not the loading screen. Also, the sentence was worded too strongly before.
634:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
1350: 1331: 1288: 1269: 1075: 1041: 945: 678: 588: 535: 516: 927: 142:(the source in the article said the same) Its relation to his controversy is speculative. 8: 1491: 1461: 1115: 1079: 596: 565: 389: 47: 17: 849:
https://www.newsweek.com/qanon-conspiracy-minecraft-creator-notch-markus-persson-1351465
815: 618: 488: 355: 303: 252: 201: 154: 99: 513:(even better) "to partake in" but not "to part of," which doesn't really make sense. 1103: 1008: 995: 766: 702: 377: 180: 1370: 1317: 333: 282: 231: 129: 923: 648:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1482: 1457: 1456:. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. 1400: 1145: 1111: 936: 885: 558: 439: 382: 806: 613: 481: 346: 294: 243: 192: 145: 90: 1453: 1099: 1362:
tweet, there's nothing there to suggest they got it from a middle man. --
1004: 991: 762: 698: 176: 1363: 1310: 326: 275: 224: 122: 81: 972: 843:
This section should also inform the reader that Persson has endorsed
985: 724:
2) That Microsoft removed Persson’s name from the loading screens
1452:
According to the page's protection level you should be able to
977: 844: 721:
1) That Persson received no criticism on twitter before 2017
1384: 1226: 1129: 869: 423: 718:
This page literally has two claims that are incorrect:
970:
He is best known for creating the sandbox video game
1223:Inadequate sources in the "Controversies" section 866:Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2020 585:regarding race and gender, among other topics." 420:Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2019 1126:Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2022 576:Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2020 87:splash's removal was because of his tweets. 1429:and would like to add them to the article. 1381:Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2022 464:Maybe citation 40, 41 will be sufficient 976:and for founding the video game company 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 731:“Multiple reliable secondary sources” 25: 23: 24: 1507: 1108:this tongue-in-cheek NYT blogpost 1471: 1444: 1388: 1300: 1230: 1199: 1133: 873: 547: 427: 138:Every source states, basically, 29: 931:16:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 916:16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 13: 1: 1058:17:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC) 1026:18:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC) 1000:22:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC) 962:22:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC) 7: 1415:to reactivate your request. 1403:has been answered. Set the 1253:to reactivate your request. 1241:has been answered. Set the 1160:to reactivate your request. 1148:has been answered. Set the 1120:02:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1092:14:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 900:to reactivate your request. 888:has been answered. Set the 502:21:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 474:14:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 454:to reactivate your request. 442:has been answered. Set the 10: 1512: 1375:00:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC) 1355:00:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC) 1217:19:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC) 1193:18:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC) 628:05:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 605:15:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 570:10:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC) 540:10:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC) 274:to Perrson's comments." -- 1496:14:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 1466:04:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 1439:19:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 1322:19:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC) 1293:19:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC) 1266:Thank you for your time. 861:11:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 832:03:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC) 793:21:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 771:12:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 756:06:46, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 707:11:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC) 508:Minor Edit Recommendation 394:07:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 372:05:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 338:04:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 320:04:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 287:03:39, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 269:02:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 236:02:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 218:01:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 185:01:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 171:01:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 134:01:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 116:01:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 1104:deciding how much weight 691:22:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC) 658:14:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC) 1431:OsloKristianiaKøbenhavn 1427:Template:Markus Persson 1423:Category:Markus Persson 1011:) I am speaking of the 1454:edit the page yourself 1328:on this wiki page. :) 968:Are you talking about 1209:ScottishFinnishRadish 42:of past discussions. 1013:He is best known... 75:Removal of splashes 18:Talk:Markus Persson 650:Community Tech bot 1494: 1419: 1418: 1357: 1334:comment added by 1295: 1272:comment added by 1257: 1256: 1164: 1163: 1078:comment added by 1044:comment added by 948:comment added by 904: 903: 693: 681:comment added by 607: 591:comment added by 568: 542: 532: 519:comment added by 458: 457: 392: 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1503: 1485: 1481: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1448: 1447: 1410: 1406: 1392: 1391: 1385: 1367: 1348: 1347: 1314: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1286: 1285: 1248: 1244: 1234: 1233: 1227: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1182: 1173: 1169: 1155: 1151: 1137: 1136: 1130: 1100:reliable sources 1098:Do you have any 1094: 1060: 1034:Minor Fix Needed 1018:Gargantuan Brain 964: 950:Gargantuan Brain 895: 891: 877: 876: 870: 830: 827: 821: 818: 812: 809: 676: 586: 561: 557: 555: 551: 550: 533: 514: 449: 445: 431: 430: 424: 385: 381: 370: 367: 361: 358: 352: 349: 330: 318: 315: 309: 306: 300: 297: 279: 267: 264: 258: 255: 249: 246: 228: 216: 213: 207: 204: 198: 195: 169: 166: 160: 157: 151: 148: 126: 114: 111: 105: 102: 96: 93: 85: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1483: 1472: 1470: 1445: 1408: 1404: 1389: 1383: 1365: 1329: 1312: 1301: 1299: 1267: 1246: 1242: 1231: 1225: 1200: 1198: 1181:}}</ref: --> 1175: 1171: 1167: 1153: 1149: 1134: 1128: 1073: 1066: 1039: 1036: 943: 939: 921:Have removed – 893: 889: 874: 868: 825: 822: 816: 813: 807: 804: 665: 643:Mojang logo.svg 636: 578: 559: 548: 546: 510: 447: 443: 428: 422: 383: 365: 362: 356: 353: 347: 344: 328: 313: 310: 304: 301: 295: 292: 277: 262: 259: 253: 250: 244: 241: 226: 211: 208: 202: 199: 193: 190: 164: 161: 155: 152: 146: 143: 124: 109: 106: 100: 97: 91: 88: 79: 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1509: 1499: 1498: 1468: 1417: 1416: 1401:Markus Persson 1393: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1353:comment added 1325: 1324: 1291:comment added 1255: 1254: 1235: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1166:Please change 1162: 1161: 1146:Markus Persson 1138: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1080:Cassie Schebel 1065: 1062: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 938: 935: 934: 933: 902: 901: 886:Markus Persson 878: 867: 864: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 796: 795: 785:65.255.181.151 781: 777: 748:65.255.181.151 744: 740: 736: 732: 729: 725: 722: 719: 712: 710: 709: 683:65.255.181.151 664: 661: 646: 645: 635: 632: 631: 630: 577: 574: 573: 572: 538:comment added 509: 506: 505: 504: 456: 455: 440:Markus Persson 432: 421: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1508: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1478: 1469: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1414: 1411:parameter to 1402: 1398: 1394: 1387: 1386: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1352: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1307: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1294: 1290: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1260: 1252: 1249:parameter to 1240: 1236: 1229: 1228: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185:207.81.187.41 1180: 1159: 1156:parameter to 1147: 1143: 1139: 1132: 1131: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1071: 1064:Anti Semitism 1061: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1046:DraconicLexon 1043: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 987: 981: 979: 975: 974: 967: 966: 965: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 932: 929: 926: 925: 920: 919: 918: 917: 913: 909: 908:47.154.85.151 899: 896:parameter to 887: 883: 879: 872: 871: 863: 862: 858: 854: 853:88.70.146.158 850: 846: 833: 829: 828: 820: 819: 811: 810: 802: 798: 797: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 759: 758: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 730: 726: 723: 720: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 708: 704: 700: 696: 695: 694: 692: 688: 684: 680: 673: 669: 663:Controversies 660: 659: 655: 651: 644: 641: 640: 639: 629: 626: 625: 621: 620: 616: 615: 610: 609: 608: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 582: 571: 567: 563: 554: 545: 544: 543: 541: 537: 530: 526: 522: 518: 503: 500: 499: 498: 493: 492: 491: 486: 485: 484: 478: 477: 476: 475: 471: 467: 462: 453: 450:parameter to 441: 437: 433: 426: 425: 395: 391: 387: 379: 375: 374: 373: 369: 368: 360: 359: 351: 350: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 323: 322: 321: 317: 316: 308: 307: 299: 298: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 272: 271: 270: 266: 265: 257: 256: 248: 247: 239: 238: 237: 233: 229: 221: 220: 219: 215: 214: 206: 205: 197: 196: 188: 187: 186: 182: 178: 174: 173: 172: 168: 167: 159: 158: 150: 149: 141: 137: 136: 135: 131: 127: 120: 119: 118: 117: 113: 112: 104: 103: 95: 94: 83: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1488: 1476: 1449: 1420: 1412: 1397:edit request 1349:— Preceding 1330:— Preceding 1326: 1305: 1287:— Preceding 1268:— Preceding 1265: 1261: 1258: 1250: 1239:edit request 1204: 1178: 1176:<ref: --> 1165: 1157: 1142:edit request 1074:— Preceding 1069: 1067: 1040:— Preceding 1037: 1012: 983: 971: 969: 944:— Preceding 940: 922: 905: 897: 882:edit request 842: 823: 814: 805: 800: 711: 677:— Preceding 674: 670: 666: 647: 637: 622: 617: 612: 587:— Preceding 583: 579: 552: 534:— Preceding 515:— Preceding 511: 496: 494: 489: 487: 482: 480: 463: 459: 451: 436:edit request 363: 354: 345: 311: 302: 293: 260: 251: 242: 209: 200: 191: 162: 153: 144: 139: 107: 98: 89: 78: 65: 43: 37: 1336:Swausinator 1274:Swausinator 1070:controversy 847:(see, e.g. 675:Thoughts? 36:This is an 1421:I created 1405:|answered= 1243:|answered= 1150:|answered= 1072:section. 890:|answered= 521:Will Joyce 466:87.79.71.3 444:|answered= 1458:Aaron Liu 1450:Not done: 1112:Ionmars10 973:Minecraft 378:WP:LAYOUT 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 1344:contribs 1332:unsigned 1282:contribs 1270:unsigned 1088:contribs 1076:unsigned 1054:contribs 1042:unsigned 988:account. 980:in 2009. 958:contribs 946:unsigned 924:Thjarkur 808:Nixinova 679:unsigned 614:Nixinova 601:contribs 589:unsigned 529:contribs 517:unsigned 483:Nixinova 348:Nixinova 296:Nixinova 245:Nixinova 194:Nixinova 147:Nixinova 92:Nixinova 1351:undated 1289:undated 986:Twitter 593:Valkoun 536:undated 39:archive 1005:Swinxy 992:SWinxy 978:Mojang 937:Maybe? 928:(talk) 763:ferret 699:ferret 177:ferret 1486:KNOWZ 1409:|ans= 1395:This 1247:|ans= 1237:This 1154:|ans= 1140:This 894:|ans= 880:This 851:). -- 845:QAnon 611:Done 562:KNOWZ 479:Done 448:|ans= 434:This 386:KNOWZ 82:Masem 16:< 1492:TALK 1484:HELL 1477:Done 1462:talk 1435:talk 1425:and 1366:asem 1340:talk 1313:asem 1306:Done 1278:talk 1213:talk 1205:Done 1189:talk 1179:live 1172:dead 1168:live 1116:talk 1084:talk 1050:talk 1022:talk 1009:talk 996:talk 954:talk 912:talk 857:talk 789:talk 767:talk 752:talk 703:talk 687:talk 654:talk 597:talk 566:TALK 560:HELL 556:. — 553:Done 525:talk 470:talk 390:TALK 384:HELL 380:. — 329:asem 278:asem 227:asem 181:talk 125:asem 1407:or 1399:to 1245:or 1174:in 1170:to 1152:or 1144:to 982:or 892:or 884:to 783:-- 446:or 438:to 1480:— 1464:) 1437:) 1413:no 1373:) 1346:) 1342:• 1320:) 1284:) 1280:• 1251:no 1215:) 1191:) 1183:. 1158:no 1118:) 1090:) 1086:• 1056:) 1052:• 1024:) 998:) 960:) 956:• 914:) 898:no 859:) 801:is 791:) 769:) 754:) 746:-- 705:) 689:) 656:) 603:) 599:• 531:) 527:• 472:) 452:no 336:) 325:-- 285:) 234:) 223:-- 183:) 132:) 1489:∣ 1460:( 1433:( 1371:t 1369:( 1364:M 1338:( 1318:t 1316:( 1311:M 1276:( 1211:( 1187:( 1114:( 1082:( 1048:( 1020:( 1007:( 994:( 952:( 910:( 855:( 826:C 817:T 787:( 765:( 750:( 701:( 685:( 652:( 624:C 619:T 595:( 564:▎ 523:( 497:C 490:T 468:( 388:▎ 366:C 357:T 334:t 332:( 327:M 314:C 305:T 283:t 281:( 276:M 263:C 254:T 232:t 230:( 225:M 212:C 203:T 179:( 165:C 156:T 130:t 128:( 123:M 110:C 101:T 84:: 80:@ 50:.

Index

Talk:Markus Persson
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Masem
Nixinova
T
C
01:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Masem
t
01:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Nixinova
T
C
01:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
ferret
talk
01:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Nixinova
T
C
01:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Masem
t
02:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Nixinova
T
C

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.