309:
277:
261:
245:
21:
81:
147:
112:
476:
157:
692:
In
American English it is often spelt without an e. However, using phonetic rules this should then be pronounced with a hard "g" sound. "g" needs to be followed by particular vowels to have a soft "j" sound, "e" being one of them. So, although judgment has become the common spelling, it really should
511:
and the disambiguation page for
Judgment and the pages that disambiguation page links to all contain a spelling inconsistent with the spelling of this page. For the sake of uniformity it would seem wise to change all or change none, if the difference is merely regional, applying to each instance
772:) 19:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Except that there are more than five times as many web references to "judgment of history" than "judgement of history." Just telling the truth. More than four times as many web references to "divine judgment" than "divine judgement."
863:
If no one objects, I am going to clean up and fill out this article a little more over the next couple weeks, especially with some more sourcing and for usages other than
Aristotelian logic. Feel free to undo any changes I make that don't seem an improvement.
733:"judgment" has been the spelling on both sides of the pond from the late 1600s all the way to when Webster put it in his dictionary in 1828. 'Judgment' with the added 'e' is modern spelling used in certain regions, but it is in no way standard English.
798:'Judgment' as in condemnation or a determination by any authority is spelled without the 'e'. 'Judgement' as in any other opinion, estimate or discernment is spelled with an 'e'. This according to at least the 1965 edition of Fowler's
671:
It's my understanding that it's 'judgement' generally in BE, save where it's the judgment of court etc, when it's judgment...no idea why but then since when did
English spellings make sense
650:
One further point - you may think we can't spell, but when we refer to a court judgment we have deliberately missed an “e” out. It is not entirely clear why, it's just the way it is spelt!
738:
631:
178:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
642:
Interesting that the Oxford dictionary seems to put it down as judgement, but on the website of the
Judiciary of England and Wales' Communications Office seems to
610:
809:
892:
887:
215:
805:
927:
620:
The UK's
Guardian, Telegraph and Times newspapers' spelling guides all recommend 'judgment' over 'judgement', as does Collins' dictionary.
268:
126:
912:
902:
252:
205:
122:
853:
540:
922:
665:
932:
839:
591:
907:
897:
62:
719:
Someone removed the mentioning of alternative spelling, which I've reinstated. This word is incidentally discussed in
Knowledge's
917:
564:
942:
419:
764:
through the paradigm of history. There does appear to be a certain ovidian paganization of history in this type of rhetoric.
339:
180:
614:
549:. It was never an official page move; it was done by cut and paste, which is the wrong way to move pages even when the move
779:
734:
720:
627:
577:
937:
833:
726:
This page should be titled "Judgment" without the "e" - considering that in
American English the other way is incorrect.
635:
947:
678:
606:
742:
686:
521:
708:
700:
492:
824:
It appears there could be a link to another wikipedia page under uses of the word. i.e. adjudicational capabilities
813:
330:
170:
117:
443:
498:
396:
66:
787:
849:
829:
793:
747:
358:
348:
92:
869:
756:, which often appears in modern political rhetoric. It seems to have replaced the more ancient notion of
714:
462:
284:
130:
58:
844:
Some other pages that could be listed under "See Also" could be the wikipedia pages on reason and logic
818:
643:
873:
783:
587:
536:
57:
is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
845:
825:
422:
392:
382:
80:
865:
802:. This useful distinction will be lost if we spell this word in either sense indiscriminately.
682:
656:
I always thought it was spelt judgement in
British English (I'm in Australia) so there you go.
517:
488:
322:
704:
98:
775:
753:
696:
674:
661:
623:
408:
8:
760:, and therefore could give the impression that contemporary secular people are trying to
583:
532:
574:
372:
730:
513:
484:
400:
336:
162:
507:
without discussion. Furthermore, an orphaned talk page appears to have been left at
757:
528:
657:
378:
314:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
33:
29:
362:
559:
468:
428:
368:
308:
881:
769:
570:
508:
432:
415:
388:
20:
352:
436:
483:
Duplicated language replaced with an original substitute some time ago. -
373:
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
276:
260:
244:
858:
531:. I'm not sure how to do it. Can an admin please step in and fix this?
353:"The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment."
318:
175:
174:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
554:
503:
I'm concerned that this article appears to have been moved here from
752:
Perhaps there should be an entry about the philosophical concept of
450:
765:
761:
546:
504:
451:"Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment."
323:
Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions
569:
Well if it comes to that, "Judgement" is the better spelling. --
363:"Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them"
437:
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
146:
111:
527:
Yes, this needs to be reverted, since it's a violation of
303:
605:
includes a summary of the most important guidelines
444:"Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases."
152:
731:
https://www.dictionary.com/e/judgement-vs-judgment/
446:Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, pp. 1124–1131.
879:
409:"Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error"
15:
328:
469:http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=judgement
893:Knowledge articles that use British English
888:Knowledge articles that use Oxford spelling
78:
355:Neuron, vol. 44, no. 2, 2004, pp. 389–400.
420:"Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict."
329:Bazerman, Max H.; Moore, Don A. (2009).
880:
406:
332:Judgment in Managerial Decision Making
184:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
65:, this should not be changed without
928:Low-importance epistemology articles
442:Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman.
168:This article is within the scope of
74:
449:Nisbett, Richard E., and Lee Ross.
97:It is of interest to the following
13:
913:Low-importance Aesthetics articles
903:Low-importance Philosophy articles
800:Modern Use of the English Language
275:
259:
243:
14:
959:
923:Start-Class epistemology articles
933:Epistemology task force articles
474:
307:
190:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
155:
145:
110:
79:
19:
908:Start-Class Aesthetics articles
898:Start-Class Philosophy articles
407:Schulz, Kathryn (2 June 2011).
210:This article has been rated as
193:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
918:Aesthetics task force articles
666:05:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
943:Low-importance logic articles
874:01:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
788:22:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
743:12:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
636:07:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
687:11:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
615:08:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
545:Okay, I've moved it back to
7:
709:20:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
10:
964:
938:Start-Class logic articles
854:17:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
834:17:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
522:02:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
493:02:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
472:
467:Copyright violation. See
216:project's importance scale
948:Logic task force articles
592:16:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
578:08:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
565:18:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
541:17:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
283:
267:
251:
226:
222:
209:
140:
105:
814:03:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
840:Additions to "See Also"
644:put it down as judgment
423:Oxford University Press
393:Critique of Pure Reason
383:Thinking, Fast and Slow
227:Associated task forces:
411:. Granta Publications.
280:
264:
248:
171:WikiProject Philosophy
87:This article is rated
499:Undiscussed Page Move
279:
263:
247:
794:Spelling Distinction
754:judgement of history
748:Judgement of history
453:Prentice-Hall, 1980.
63:relevant style guide
59:varieties of English
715:Spelling variations
463:Copyright violation
196:Philosophy articles
61:. According to the
846:Miss.marinagriffin
826:Miss.marinagriffin
819:References missing
602:Just come over now
403:, Macmillan, 1929.
281:
265:
249:
181:general discussion
93:content assessment
866:HelmholtzButLater
778:comment added by
699:comment added by
677:comment added by
626:comment added by
553:have consensus. —
460:
459:
433:Sunstein, Cass R.
429:Thaler, Richard H
401:Norman Kemp Smith
359:Greene, Joshua D.
349:Greene, Joshua D.
341:978-0-470-04945-7
302:
301:
298:
297:
294:
293:
290:
289:
163:Philosophy portal
73:
72:
955:
790:
758:divine judgement
711:
689:
638:
495:
478:
477:
416:Sunstein, Cass R
412:
379:Kahneman, Daniel
365:. Penguin Press.
345:
311:
304:
234:
224:
223:
198:
197:
194:
191:
188:
165:
160:
159:
158:
149:
142:
141:
136:
133:
114:
107:
106:
90:
84:
83:
75:
26:This article is
23:
16:
963:
962:
958:
957:
956:
954:
953:
952:
878:
877:
861:
842:
821:
796:
773:
750:
721:Manual of style
717:
694:
672:
621:
501:
496:
482:
480:
475:
465:
369:Haidt, Jonathan
342:
232:
195:
192:
189:
186:
185:
161:
156:
154:
134:
120:
91:on Knowledge's
88:
67:broad consensus
34:Oxford spelling
30:British English
12:
11:
5:
961:
951:
950:
945:
940:
935:
930:
925:
920:
915:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
860:
857:
841:
838:
837:
836:
820:
817:
795:
792:
780:67.175.127.171
749:
746:
735:165.255.241.15
716:
713:
693:be judgement.
669:
668:
654:
653:
652:
628:85.140.237.177
618:
617:
603:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
584:Samuel Webster
533:Samuel Webster
500:
497:
473:
464:
461:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
447:
440:
426:
413:
404:
389:Kant, Immanuel
386:
376:
366:
356:
346:
340:
326:
315:
312:
300:
299:
296:
295:
292:
291:
288:
287:
282:
272:
271:
266:
256:
255:
250:
240:
239:
237:
235:
229:
228:
220:
219:
212:Low-importance
208:
202:
201:
199:
167:
166:
150:
138:
137:
135:Low‑importance
115:
103:
102:
96:
85:
71:
70:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
960:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
924:
921:
919:
916:
914:
911:
909:
906:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
889:
886:
885:
883:
876:
875:
871:
867:
856:
855:
851:
847:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
816:
815:
811:
807:
803:
801:
791:
789:
785:
781:
777:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
745:
744:
740:
736:
732:
729:According to
727:
724:
722:
712:
710:
706:
702:
698:
690:
688:
684:
680:
676:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
648:
647:
645:
641:
640:
639:
637:
633:
629:
625:
616:
612:
608:
604:
601:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
579:
576:
572:
568:
567:
566:
563:
562:
558:
557:
552:
548:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:
524:
523:
519:
515:
510:
509:Talk:Judgment
506:
494:
490:
486:
471:
470:
452:
448:
445:
441:
438:
434:
430:
427:
424:
421:
417:
414:
410:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
384:
380:
377:
374:
370:
367:
364:
360:
357:
354:
350:
347:
343:
338:
334:
333:
327:
324:
320:
317:
316:
313:
310:
306:
305:
286:
278:
274:
273:
270:
262:
258:
257:
254:
246:
242:
241:
238:
236:
231:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
207:
204:
203:
200:
183:
182:
177:
173:
172:
164:
153:
151:
148:
144:
143:
139:
132:
128:
124:
119:
116:
113:
109:
108:
104:
100:
94:
86:
82:
77:
76:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
31:
25:
22:
18:
17:
862:
843:
804:
799:
797:
751:
728:
725:
718:
691:
679:85.118.28.67
670:
649:
619:
607:98.20.41.152
560:
555:
550:
514:CheshireKatz
502:
485:CheshireKatz
466:
331:
269:Epistemology
211:
179:
169:
127:Epistemology
99:WikiProjects
54:
53:; note that
50:
47:organization
46:
42:
38:
27:
774:—Preceding
701:198.91.8.10
695:—Preceding
673:—Preceding
622:—Preceding
512:equally. -
319:Ariely, Dan
89:Start-class
28:written in
882:Categories
806:Fynepointe
658:Rentrustic
582:"Better?"
397:Translated
253:Aesthetics
187:Philosophy
176:philosophy
123:Aesthetics
118:Philosophy
646:stating:
529:WP:ENGVAR
351:, et al.
335:. Wiley.
776:unsigned
762:play God
697:unsigned
675:unsigned
624:unsigned
571:Evertype
547:Judgment
505:Judgment
479:Resolved
361:(2013).
859:Updates
425:, 1996.
214:on the
51:analyse
43:realize
431:. and
95:scale.
39:colour
285:Logic
131:Logic
32:with
870:talk
850:talk
830:talk
810:talk
784:talk
770:talk
739:talk
705:talk
683:talk
662:talk
632:talk
611:talk
588:talk
551:does
537:talk
518:talk
489:talk
337:ISBN
55:-ize
766:ADM
399:by
395:."
391:. "
381:. "
371:. "
321:. "
206:Low
884::
872:)
852:)
832:)
812:)
786:)
741:)
723:.
707:)
685:)
664:)
634:)
613:)
590:)
561:gr
556:An
539:)
520:)
491:)
481:–
439:".
418:.
385:."
325:".
233:/
129:/
125:/
121::
49:,
45:,
41:,
868:(
848:(
828:(
808:(
782:(
768:(
737:(
703:(
681:(
660:(
630:(
609:(
586:(
575:✆
573:·
535:(
516:(
487:(
435:"
375:"
344:.
218:.
101::
69:.
37:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
