Talk:Color space - Knowledge

1219:

multiple color models. Some scientific color models such as x,y,Y or L*a*b* encompass all of human vision and have a defined scale such that a particular color will always have the same set of values. It’s quite useful to be able to assign a numeric value to a color based upon how humans perceive colors. Other color models such as RGB or CMYK have no standard defined scale or reference. These color models are abstractions and cannot describe a specific color with out first defining the scale or reference. Having an RGB value such as R10/G30/B50 does not tell us how to reproduce that color; the values provided are simply a ratio of the primary components (in this case RGB) without a necessary scale. In this example we know there’s more blue than red, more green than red, but not as much green as blue. Without a scale to tell us the actual amounts we can’t reproduce this color. This is where a color space comes into play. A color space provides this additional and necessary information.

1227:

with a specific scale—1 cup of flour, 8 tablespoons of butter, and 2 cups of chocolate chips—I’ve provided the necessary information, the scale, to make a dozen chocolate chip cookies. If I provide additional information such as the brand of chocolate chips, you can reproduce exactly the same cookies I made. I can give you the cookie recipe in the metric scale such as liters and grams and you can still makes the same cookies even though the numbers are different. A color space is a color model that has a known reference and scale, in this case primaries (the ingredients) and scale (specific quantities of these ingredients).

1147:

coordinates of the spaces participating in the translation. I feel the following points are absent from the current article: - linearity of color spaces, with proper notation ("prime" notation for non-linear spaces, such as Y'PbPr, and R'G'B' vs linear RGB) - coordinates/definition of a color space (color primaries, white point) - quantization and gamma correction, along with most commonly used gamma curves - add more examples of color spaces - scRGB, explain "studio RGB" vs "computer RGB" - clarify which Y'PbPr/Y'CbCr spaces are being referenced - ITU-R BT 601, BT 709, SMPTE 170M etc etc.

78: 892:. I don't really know, I can only give an opinion. If we were to treat the problem rigurously encyclopedical, they should be distinct articles. They should only be distinct however in a highly specialized encyclopedia where we would assume that all readers are graphic designers familiar with the concepts in the first place. If the target is the layman, which I think is the case in a generic encyclopedia, then I think the right way to go is combining the two in one article explaining the differences (much like how it is now). -- 132: 111: 21: 235: 214: 303: 454:

quantifiable, but it is nearly impossible to think in the LAB system. On the other hand it's pretty easy to visualize the proper color once you know it's Hue, Value and Chroma, so products are generally sold by Munsell color, but the Munsell system is not perceptually equalized because the color difference between one hew and another is arbitrary, so I had to convert everything over to LAB before any calculations could be done.

356: 335: 1223:

three primary values in three dimensions by treating the primaries as coordinates in space. This creates a solid or volume that represents all possible colors in that color space. This is a color space! The color space exists within the larger universe of human vision. Each color space is in a different position relative to this universe. Thus the same RGB values in each color space will be in a different location.

69: 1187: 1840:. IMO they are both important terms that should be covered and IMO fundamentally different. Gamut is an attribute of color spaces and also of anything that produces color. IMO it inconceivable to not have an article on Color Space. That would be like eliminating the article on "Ocean" and merging it into the "Sea level" article because they have content in common. 1010:

every such conversion further damages the image. As a result, when converting your RGB image from whatever color space you were using to CMYK for print, it's recommended that you convert directly to the color space of the target device in one go. So basically you're incorporating the device profile in the target color space definition.

466:

color vision is non-Euclidean, so it is impossible to have a three-dimensional color space for which distance between points in that space accurately quantifies color differences. But yes, this article is very lacking: it's missing any kind of historical discussion, and it completely misses many of the most useful color spaces. --

1042:. That means that each of the three channels in such an RGB implementation can store 256 discrete levels of color. Any color space based on the RGB model is thus limited to a gamut of 256×256×256=16.7 million colors. Therefore a "small", "restrictive" color space based on this RGB implementation will result in exactly the same 1125:

ideal lighting conditions). For a purely digital image, the term doesn't even apply. I would think accuracy should be measured as a percentage - a digital image is somewhere between 0% and 100% accurate (at least in terms of the colors represented). An increase in bits-per-channel obviously increases the

1906:

Gamut and color space are two completely separate concepts. Both are highly notable topics, and should be covered in different articles. A gamut is a set of colors, akin to a set of physical objects. Color spaces and color models are like geometric spaces and and associated coordinate systems used to

1129:

of distinct colors, but I think it's important to qualify that fact with a mention (preferably with some references) that humans can't distinguish that many, and most display hardware can't display that many. AFAIK, the only reasonable application for 16-bit/channel color is as an intermediate format

900:

Valid points. I never really considered that there are many different RGB and CMYK color spaces. I suppose the same would be true of other color spaces as well; would it be true to say that a color space is influenced not only by the corresponding color model, but also by the environmental conditions

736:

Ok, don't want to sound rude (why does that syntagm always induce the feeling that something rude follows?), but have you had the curiosity to diff those articles to the state before my changes? I mean, I agree with most of the points you criticise (e.g. XYZ color space irrelevance, color space/color

449:

I'm not sure what to do about this, but I think it important to mention that there are older systems, particularly the Mussell (Hue, Value, Chroma) system which predates nearly all of the other systems and, IIRC, was designed for painters to be able to talk more accurately about the paint colors they

1655:

even if not a color space. Even then, it's not in itself a reliable source because it's self-published original/primary material. (It's also a rambling essay with some bad science sprinkled in.) Is there a reliable published secondary source that can establish its notability as a color model and

1150:

Lastly, it should be pointed out that the R'G'B' spaces currently used in computer graphics/video are, in fact, represented on 32 bits. Indeed, 24 bits are actually used for color channels, but ease of addressing and manipulation dictated a full double word is used. The remaining 8 bits are used for

989:

Not all monitors are able to display the whole Adobe RGB gamut. You can wind up using Adobe RGB just to find that you messed up your images in processing because you have the wrong feedback about what you're doing. Apple used to make some great monitors with a gamut about twice the size of a regular

940:

You're absolutely right throughout the posting above. To get it out of the way, yes, I also feel that the HSV/YUV/Lab models don't really need to be split. I might be wrong though, I haven't read much literature on these because I personally never use them in order to avoid converting my images back

698:

Man, you're more than welcome to kick some life into these articles! I was checking them out recently, and after finding a lot more inconsistencies than the ones you outline above, I started polishing them. All my edits do however acknowledge the fact that more work needs to be done on those topics,

1596:

Why does this article begin with a definition of 'color model'. It is not clear to me, a non-specialist, whether color model and color space can be used interchangeably, or if this is just poor article structure. I would have thought a page on color space should begin with an unambiguous definition

1523:

The two words are usually used interchangeably in scientific literature, and I think the separation between them that Knowledge uses (“color model” meaning the idea / mathematical construction, “color space” meaning explicitly relatable to colorimetric data) is basically original research. For what

1021:

The terminology is pretty ambigous, I know, sounds like sometimes two things are the same, while other times they're distinct. I can only hope this posting sheds a little more light on hot the terms are generally used. Because academically color spaces and device profiles really are the same thing.

1009:

along with the color space, it's great if the target color space is the actual color space of the target device. That avoids converting to the target color model in one step, only to convert again to the proper color space within the respective color model in a subsequent step. That's great because

981:

The color space is much wider, but the number of colors which can be encoded in 24 bits is the same. The result is a wider distance between colors. The gamut is "thinner" if you wish, it's less dense than sRGB. The problem with this is that further manipulating the image will result in degrading it

964:

is a color space used to standardize generic monitors. It's basically the de facto RGB model default color space. It's used primarily for web design, that's what you'll read in most FAQ's out there, but should be used generically for all processes targeted at computer displays (interactive CD-ROMs,

465:

Actually, the hues in Munsell are more perceptually uniformly spaced than in L*a*b*. It's just that if you go in an arbitrary direction in Munsell (varying hue, value, and chroma all at once), the distance between colors doesn't particularly imply their perceptual difference. Unfortunately, human

457:

My point here, is that there is lots of important information about Color Spaces which has nothing to do with RGB, or CMYK. In particular, I think the notion of regular and irregular color spaces ought to be included somehow. On the other hand I did this work a long time ago (when I was 16) so my

1112:

This is surely wrong. Is 16 bit/channel RGB 16 million times more accurate than 16 bit/channel greyscale, and is 16/channel bit CMYK 256 times more accurate than 16 bit RGB? No, surely not. On the other hand this replaced a section that said "twice as much" accuracy, and that's clearly wrong too.

999:

I hope that makes it a little clearer. A color space (or "working color space", as they often call it) is a way to encode colors from the Lab space into the RGB model. On the other hand, you should also calibrate your input and output devices (scanner, digital camera, monitor, printer) and produce

747:

The only thing I don't agree with in your comments is the fact that you seem not to agree with the idea of "separate model/space article for each model/space". Given the particularities of each model and each space, I don't think it's out of line to have distinct articles on each of the mainstream

1362:

Cone Contrast Space if defined by the change in response of the three cone types. The origin of this space (0,0,0) is defined by the current state of adaptation of the three cone types, so it is certainly not absolute or arbitrary. And it is the most useful space to use if you want to model the

1226:

Going back to the chocolate chip cookie analogy, suppose a color model is a cookie recipe with only three ingredients. I give you this recipe, which simply calls for 1-flour, 8-butter and 2-chocolate chips. You don’t have enough information to make the cookies. However if I provide you the recipe

1222:

Think for a minute about the term color space. The first word, color, is fairly obvious. Let’s look at the term space in context. I have three sets of numbers to define red, green, and blue (R10/G130/B50) but how red or green or blue are these values? What is the scale? It is possible to plot any

1124:

I think "accuracy" is the wrong word to use. Accuracy refers to the precision with which some original reference point is measured. If the 16-bit image in question is a scan of a photograph, then the color accuracy would be how closely each pixel matches the color in the photo (under some kind of

829:

Another reason is that RGB is the color space champion, everybody uses RGB color spaces on a daily basis, we just don't realize it (when scanning documents, printing or editing images, or even surfing the web). Also, everybody's buying digital cameras these days, people will want to know more and

428:

This article is fairly technical. I think the introduction should be expanded with a brief explanation of how color spaces are actually used by artists and graphic designers today, i.e. what problems they solve. In particular, laypersons are now exposed to color space terminology via popular PC

1858:

Considering that more than 50 percent of the content of those articles overlap, I think it is not justified to have separate articles at this point (may be later, yes if needed). Alternatives to this would be to remove all overlap and highlight the differences properly. However, highlighting the

1388:

I think it was me who changed that part. Per definition (at least as i know it) reflected light does not 'interact' (for lack of a better term - i'm not native english) with the object reflecting it. Remitted light on the other hand does, which is why you can see the object's color. Only mirrors

1056:

No, it's not. It does use the means of the RGB example to prove a point, but that's only because RGB is the model understood by most people. If CMYK or some other bit depth would've been the most widespread, then I would've used the CMYK example with the respective depth to prove the same point:

1015:

That's why technical documents generally say that the CMYK color spaces are device-dependent, as opposed to the RGB spaces which are device-independent. I don't care what you're displaying my Adobe RGB image on, just make sure you calibrate that thing to show the proper colors. That's because my

723:

I like the work you've done to this article - bravo! I'm not so sure I like the idea of having a separate model/space article for each model/space. Though, having either one redirect to the other could just cause more confusion, so maybe it is good to keep 'em separate. It just doesn't seem like

1377:

I have reverted the edit changing "reflected" to "remitted." While "remission" may be a term of art in spectroscopy, it is not generally used in color science. For example, the term "remission" does not appear in the index of Wyszecki and Stiles's second edition, a definitive reference in color

1218:

A color model is a method of grouping numeric values by a set of primaries. Most color models have three primary components (e.g., RGB, CMY, LCH, HSV, L*a*b*). Some application-specific color models use more components, for example, CMYK. Photoshop and other image editing applications work with

453:

LAB, is another popular color space, which should be mentioned. I used to work on a research project to match dental porcelain colors to actual tooth colors, and I had to write a program to calculate color differences. The LAB system is perceptually equalized so that the color differences are

1146:

It was said "It just doesn't seem like there'd be much to say about XYZ color space, aside from the fact that it's defined by the XYZ color model." Personally, I think it is very important that the CIE XYZ space is mentioned, as correct color space conversions are expressed as functions of XYZ

1251:

articles. Certainly, people do get confused between them. However, as color spaces often dervive from color models, this article at least needs to note that. It may say too much; there is no overall coordination between articles, so there is more repetition than is desirable. This can only be

912:

as a more detailed discussion of RGB color spaces. For most color models, it won't be necessary (not as of now, at least) to have a separate color space article, so those should be unified into the main HSV/YUV/CIE color model articles until there's a need to split them off. I agree that

1524:

it’s worth, “color space” is the only one of these with a formal technical definition (in the CIE’s international lighting vocabulary, the standard scientific source for such definitions). Unfortunately fixing the usage across Knowledge is a somewhat substantial project. –

1435:

The point of the list page is that a lot of color spaces are used for specific purposes, and an index (with summary) is appropriate to allow readers the opportunity to select the space that best suits them. That said I fully agree that adding a navigation template

2051:

This actually often creates some confusion (in code, and related technical documentations, discussions). They use "colorspace" to mean yuv2rgb matrices ("matrix coefficients")! While this article is somehow mainly about the "color primaries" concept in H.273! See

1096:

I hope I haven't clashed with any work in progress by adding to the sRGB and Pantone artices, and adding every color space I could find to the Color space category. I didn't see this discussion until just now. Also: is there a discussion of ICC profiles anywhere?

741:

were also in a much worse shape before I edited them today. That's why I feel obliged to reiterate: if you feel like diving into radical edits, by all means, be my guest! These articles stayed in an awful shape for months, so I can only feel good for raising the

2046: 788:

might be better, as it avoids the problem with "space" and "model" being subtly different; the distinction between "space" and "model" can then be made in (I hope) a more neutrally-titled article, if such a distinction is necessary for that article.

608:, if indeed there is such a distinction. The terms seem to be used interchangeably; the article as it currently stands makes a fairly good distinction between them, but confusion could result, especially since the article begins with a definition of 1016:

image along with the color space information map the RGB triplets to "real world colors" within the Lab space. But if you want to print my image, tell me what you want to print it on, so I can convert it directly to your printer's proper CMYK space.

1231:

I'm not sure if I agree with everything above, but it seems to contradict the third paragraph of the introduction. I don't believe that a bunch of color swatches constitutes a color space. An unsophisticated color model, yes, but color space, no.

977:

is a much wider color space. It has a huge gamut, and it's basically used to encode a much wider variation of colors in the same 24 bit structure as sRGB. There are two things which need to be pointed out regarding Adobe RGB:

1859:

differences will hardly be enough to qualify for a separate article. So one may be included in the other. Merging will remove overlap as well as confusion with the other term, helping readers understand both the terms better.

1481: 500:

In 1931, Commission internationale de l'éclairage, or CIE, developed a Red-Green-Blue (RGB) model of human color vision. Their results were combined into the specifications of the "CIE RGB color space". -Dawn McGatney

1420:

in all color space articles. It needs to be expanded, of course, but that's easy. I prefer navigation templates to "list of..." articles unless the meaning of each element in the list needs to be explained.--

1033:

The RGB color model can be implemented in various specific incarnations, depending on the capabilities of the system used. By far the most common general use incarnation at the time of this writing is the 24

1154:

I'm somewhat of a newbie to editing Wiki, and so I didn't think it was proper to proceed with these modifications prior to bringing them to attention in the discussion page. 08:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC) D.

835:

With CMYK things are even more complicated: there are probably even more color spaces for CMYK, but people don't "feel" those as color spaces, but rather as "profiles" used to describe the output device.

1252:

resolved by having an active coordinating project, not piecemeal. What seems to have happened in this article is that the author(s) of the opening paragraphs haven't followed the Knowledge standard to

1612:

I fixed that. Hopefully the difference between color space and color model is clear now. I'm thinking next where to introduce a classification of color spaces, which is missing from this article.

1358:

However, a color model with no associated mapping function to an absolute color space is a more or less arbitrary color system with little connection to the requirements of any given application.

1046:

of colors as a "large", "generous" space. The only difference between the two is the volume their gamut cover, but that is always inverse proportional to its density on the reference space.

879:

for instance). That way the coordinates are established, links to the relevant articles are provided, and anyone interested in the topic can read more about it in those respective articles.

1730: 1109:"An implementation which uses 16 bits per component will result in exactly the same range of colors as the 8 bit version, but to a 256×256×256 ≈ 16.7 million times higher accuracy." 768:, for instance (at the risk of contradicting my earlier statement that the two concepts should be made distinct). Certainly, I agree that each color system---RGB, CMYK, HSV, etc.--- 748:

color models/spaces. IMHO that can also be useful for other authors as well: an author who wants to refer specifically to sRGB for instance would be happy to be able to link to the

484:

Note: this article needs expert input: at the moment, it is extremely informal, and needs lots of work by experts in the field to give a good account of this highly technical field.

1170:

It needs to be pointed out that RGB, LAB, YIQ and HSV can be seen as 3D objects. An illustration of a 3D view of a colors space would make the concept much easier to understand! --

535:? As I understand it, (someone correct me if I'm wrong) the color space is the region of possible colors that is described by a particular color model. Color models would include 1748: 1744: 1267:

It seems to me that the color space article spends most of its time talking about color models. and the color model article spends most of its time talking about color spaces. -

954:

color spaces all digital camera owners will want to know about, so you can get a better idea. (I'm talking chiefly about Adobe RGB 1998 here, that makes the difference clearer.)

2104: 2065: 82: 2149: 1515: 312: 1301:

The other, side-by-side gradient image is a better comparison of the CMYK and RGB models. Having the color mixing images be from different palettes might be misleading. -

1282:

The image for subtractive color mixing seems too dark. Is this intentional? Otherwise, we could just make a negative of the additive mixing image and use that instead. -

1881:

Respectfully, you are not addressing the main point made, which in essence is that these are fundamentally different topics, even if they do have overlap in material.

406: 1471: 1602: 506: 2014: 1130:

for filtering, compositing, and other manipulation (to preserve as much existing "accuracy" as possible). Some mention is made of this now. I will rephrase. --

2094: 1408: 430: 1396:

Perhaps according to some definitions, but not in color science. Also, please be sure to sign your edits on this page with four tildes, thus: ~~~~ -- thanks!

2079: 946:

Regarding your first question, what you're describing is a device profile. In an academic sense, yes, that could also be called a color space. But it's not

2109: 1507: 2164: 1171: 728:

though (which is looking really good!). Dunno if I'm ready to dive in and clean all these up yet either... but hopefully we can get the ball rolling. --

396: 293: 2144: 1956: 781: 699:

as you can see from my summaries. I just didn't have the guts to make really radical changes in the articles, although I did my share (e.g. separating

317: 429:

software such as Adobe Photoshop, and these readers are probably more interested in "What is it and how is it useful?" than "How was it developed?".

1968: 1138:

Much better. On reflection I think the original (not gone) phrasing was seeking 'precision' rather than 'accuracy'; and the precision is 256 times.

1960: 1948: 1364: 1209:

I am unsure whether the article always uses "Color Model" as a word in itself, or whether its sometimes uses it as a synonymous for "Color Space".

1000:

profiles for those devices in order to properly reproduce the original color space (for input devices) or desired color space (for output devices).

2169: 1932: 1503: 724:

there'd be much to say about XYZ color space, aside from the fact that it's defined by the XYZ color model. It's about time we had an article on

196: 2041: 1994: 1936: 1716: 1429: 1907:

quantify and measure colors and hence gamuts. It is fine to reduce the amount of overlap, but keep separate articles on separate concepts. --

1318:

It's not a particularly good comparison, because many saturated (particularly dark) CMYK colors cannot be displayed on a computer display. --

372: 2159: 2139: 1212:

In any case, the Color Model part needs to be stripped into a article on its own. However, I don't feel I have the knowledge to do this.

596:

Stokes vector form of color is very useful for color transform. For example, hue rotation is performed by just a matrix product. -- goto

2134: 1621: 283: 1564: 2089: 1726:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

50: 2119: 2099: 1916: 1665: 1531: 1486:"For example, although several specific color spaces are based on the RGB model, there is no such thing as the RGB color space." 1305: 1296: 363: 340: 186: 1796: 1449: 1400: 493:"For example, although several specific color spaces are based on the RGB model, there is no such thing as the RGB color space." 1894: 1876: 1853: 1325: 150: 1583: 1260: 678:

in which the Y stands for the luminance component..."---though, if we're going to distinguish "space" from "model", a color

600:

Reviving the old question above: We should really try to be clear, in all color-related articles, on the difference between

2124: 1706: 1696: 259: 158: 812:

is the fact that there are several color spaces based on the RGB model, but there's only one RGB model. (Please note that

2129: 1543: 1467: 1410: 1271: 1204: 1598: 502: 1688: 1177: 510: 1551: 1367: 154: 1606: 1236: 2154: 2114: 2084: 1671: 1475: 796:

article, I don't know. I'm fairly sure you know more about it than I do, so your input on that would be good. --

473: 242: 219: 2030:

and an excellent "see also" list, and IMO it's not really a distinct topic. So a merge might be a good idea.

1747:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1645: 1292:

I think that it is reflecting the reality of CMYK colors, which are nothing like the complements of RGB colors.

433: 1511: 780:

risks a lot of unnecessary duplication, since the two subjects are so closely related; perhaps a title such as

1113:(Analogy: if you double the number of decimal places you do much more than double the accuracy of a number). 54: 1831: 1717:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090306063001/http://ldos.fe.uni-lj.si/docs/documents/20030929092037_markot.pdf

1574: 1791: 1344: 1286: 91: 2027: 2023: 2016: 1382: 1349: 162: 139: 116: 46: 1766:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1104: 1687:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2009: 760:

I think I may have been unclear; what I meant was that I am not sure I see the benefit of having both

444: 1720: 965:

computer games, screen-savers, kiosk applications, whatever gets to be shown on a computer monitor).

1627: 543:, and so on, but sometimes, two different color models will describe the same color space (such as 371:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

258:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1801: 1782: 1591: 1547: 1537: 1751:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

635:

used conventionally...", odd because it does not say "The Lab color space is..." and because it

2047:

We should note that this is not the "colorspace" sometimes used in code in projects like ffmpeg

1767: 1460:

The article mentions "pure colors" but doesn't give any information on what a pure colour is.

1277: 1198: 950:

what's usually meant by color space in common use. Let's clarify sRGB vs. Adobe RGB, which are

255: 660:

which has no corresponding "model" article, and opens with "The Hue Saturation Value (or HSV)

2037: 1912: 1890: 1849: 1754: 1617: 1455: 752:

article directly instead of explaining what sRGB is within an otherwise unrelated article. --

97: 1979:). Cynthia and others have written academic article more or less on it while treating about 555:

be more appropriate to describe the collection of possible colors defined by a color space?

1922: 1774: 1499: 1463: 1417: 1167:

is multi-dimensional. A RGB color can thus be seen as a 3D object: Red=X, Green=Y, Blue=Z.

564: 690:

Etc. Anyway, this could probably use some clarification across all the color articles. --

8: 1641: 1561: 1528: 1425: 1322: 470: 458:

memory is a little fuzzy, and I have no references immediately available on the subject.

68: 1707:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081015235156/http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rgkuehni/PDFs/ColSp.pdf

1697:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020802012056/http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/color.html

1733:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1661: 1372: 423: 1773:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1194:

Here are two. I would be interesting in knowing how to model the other color spaces. -

1151:

storing transparency information (alpha). 10 bit formats are emerging (A2R10B10G10).

917:

should remain a single article, unless there becomes a strong need to have a separate

2061: 1944: 1445: 1341: 368: 1636:

It seems to represent important work in defining an improved color space. Thanks! --

830:

more about these topics. That's why I think it's important to make that distinction.

1908: 1873: 1828: 1613: 1335: 1293: 1257: 1139: 1117: 1098: 901:(lighting) and properties of the output device (printing inks, monitor phosphors)? 853: 845: 772:

have its own article, as there is a lot to say about each. I fear that having both

29: 848:

to be the "article proper" explaining the actual model and generic formats, while

1988: 1684: 1248: 1244: 909: 905: 868: 857: 849: 841: 821: 809: 805: 777: 773: 765: 761: 704: 700: 657: 651: 647: 628: 544: 524: 520: 1710: 1700: 1976: 1637: 1633: 1558: 1525: 1421: 1319: 1131: 1030:

The following paragraph is too RGB-specific for this general article, I think.

933: 797: 729: 691: 527:

brought up an interesting point; should we be making the distinction between a

467: 1739:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1256:

in the opening sentence, and have in fact decided to define a different term.

2073: 2002: 1657: 1397: 1379: 1039: 824:

article, because that's most probably what something referring to RGB means.)

20: 2057: 1984: 1441: 1005:

Now there's a trick to this. When converting an image to a different color

570: 45:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 1116:

It might be safest just to say "substantially higher accuracy". Thoughts?

1940: 1928: 1927:

Hello all, I'am searching around but I'am unable to find any article for

1861: 1816: 1811: 1740: 1680: 1652: 1302: 1283: 1268: 1195: 926: 922: 918: 914: 889: 885: 864: 793: 712: 621: 617: 860:

is right now: just a short note on the fact that "an RGB color space is

737:

model redirects), but the respective articles had the respective faults

1964: 1578: 1158: 1087: 1068: 1049: 1023: 893: 753: 716: 2053: 990:

monitor's (I don't know if they still do, but I would expect them to).

1980: 1057:

color space density over Lab space. I'll copy it back in the article.

876: 251: 131: 110: 1656:

explain the color model part of it in itself and how it's defined?

1062:

Good job on the rest of the restructuring though, great copyediting!

1999: 1952: 1482:"There is no RGB color space" This is wrong according to Knowledge! 1233: 459: 302: 247: 234: 213: 1632:

Does the "Real Color Wheel" deserve mention in this article? See:

1340:

Why is there absolutele no mention of the ISCC-NBS color model? --

1243:

I haven't looked into this in detail, but Knowledge includes both

1991:), etc. I'am checking up with you before to create the article : 1721:

http://ldos.fe.uni-lj.si/docs/documents/20030929092037_markot.pdf

871:", along with a list of the most proeminent color spaces in use ( 579:

The parameters of HSB are same that of partialy polalized light.

1186: 576:

Is there any identical color model to this Stokes vector form?

1814:

be merged considering the amount of overlap in their content.

355: 334: 1807: 725: 708: 145: 2026:

into this. There is some good writing and explanation at

1972: 872: 817: 749: 667: 540: 1691:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1490: 1035: 983: 813: 785: 671: 548: 536: 1215:

If I may quote from color management for photographers:

565:

http://blue.ribbon.to/~harpy/color_stokes_vector_en.html

1651:

Looks interesting, maybe as an approach to defining a

674:(no "space" or "model", and YUV is described as "...a 631:

opening with "CIE L*a*b (CIELAB) is the most complete

2105:

Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences

1489:

Ok, this sentence contradicts with Knowledge itself!

2150:

C-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance

559:

I found colors can be represented in Stokes vector.

367:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 246:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1743:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 840:Anyway, what I'd like to end up with would be the 1416:I would just get rid of the list article and use 1176: 2071: 682:has no Y or any other component, though a color 143:, a project that provides a central approach to 593:Hue is represented in in Stokes vector, not . 589:Brightness is the total intensity of the light. 583:Hue is the azimuth of linearly polarized light. 1729:This message was posted before February 2018. 2095:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences 1711:http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rgkuehni/PDFs/ColSp.pdf 1701:http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/color.html 982:sooner than if you were to use sRGB (see the 441:I agree. I could understand nothing from it. 15: 2080:Knowledge articles that use American English 1634:http://www.realcolorwheel.com/colorwheel.htm 2110:C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences 1971:, qualitative color scales (see example on 941:and forth and degrading them unnecessarily. 2165:High-importance computer graphics articles 33:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 2145:Mid-importance Computer hardware articles 1679:I have just modified 3 external links on 627:Additionally, there are problems such as 1185: 921:article. (Or should the main article be 586:Satuation is the degree of polarization. 571:http://blue.ribbon.to/~harpy/imagej/hue/ 149:-related subjects on Knowledge. Help us 1491:http://en.wikipedia.org/RGB_color_space 932:We are making progress, I think :-) -- 707:, along with some radical edits within 381:Knowledge:WikiProject Computer graphics 66: 2170:WikiProject Computer graphics articles 2072: 2022:I just saw the notice put up to merge 1987:. Rainbow scales are known to be BAD ( 384:Template:WikiProject Computer graphics 1947:, scientific graphs., etc. There are 53:, this should not be changed without 1993:did any of you saw an article about 616:(and even more confusingly, because 361:This article is within the scope of 240:This article is within the scope of 62: 1838:IMO Inconceivable to do that merger 1411:List of color spaces and their uses 986:article for a little more on this). 856:would be something similar to what 792:Whether there should be a separate 643:." And of course, there are these: 96:It is of interest to the following 13: 2160:C-Class computer graphics articles 2140:C-Class Computer hardware articles 301: 14: 2181: 2135:Low-importance Computing articles 1683:. Please take a moment to review 650:which strangely does not link to 2090:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 1806:I propose that the two articles 1542:Section headers need improving. 1389:really reflect light (photons?). 1038:implementation, with 8 bits per 354: 333: 233: 212: 130: 109: 76: 67: 19: 1178: 1105:16-bit color channels: accuracy 519:I've been working a bit on the 401:This article has been rated as 288:This article has been rated as 268:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 191:This article has been rated as 2120:High-importance color articles 2100:C-Class level-5 vital articles 271:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 1939:. This item is important for 1917:21:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1895:13:29, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 1877:18:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1854:04:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC) 1832:11:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC) 1622:17:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1450:20:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1368:02:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1345:00:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 375:and see a list of open tasks. 364:WikiProject Computer graphics 310:This article is supported by 262:and see a list of open tasks. 137:This article is supported by 1430:04:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC) 1306:06:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 1297:10:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1287:08:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1272:15:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 1199:08:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 313:Computer hardware task force 7: 2125:All WikiProject Color pages 2028:Draft:Color and mathematics 2024:Draft:Color and mathematics 2017:Draft:Color and mathematics 1797:21:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 1476:08:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 804:The reason why I separated 171:Knowledge:WikiProject Color 10: 2186: 2130:C-Class Computing articles 2066:03:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC) 2042:17:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC) 1760:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1676:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1666:19:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 1646:14:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 1584:03:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 1565:03:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 1552:02:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 511:17:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 407:project's importance scale 387:computer graphics articles 294:project's importance scale 197:project's importance scale 174:Template:WikiProject Color 1516:09:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1401:15:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1383:16:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1261:09:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 1237:02:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 1174:12:14, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1101:16:21, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) 1052:12:23, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) 434:11:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 400: 349: 309: 287: 228: 190: 125: 104: 2010:14:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC) 1607:09:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 1532:12:25, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 1495:Please, fix this guys. 1418:this navigation template 1326:06:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 1205:Let's remove Color Model 1142:22:09, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1120:09:23, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1090:13:08, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) 1071:12:52, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) 936:16:19, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 888:should be distinct from 800:02:50, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 732:01:13, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 694:19:42, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC) 474:06:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 1672:External links modified 1134:16:51, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1026:18:04, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 908:as a main article, and 896:14:02, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 756:02:09, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 719:00:45, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2155:All Computing articles 2115:C-Class color articles 2085:C-Class vital articles 1573:This is their idea of 1360: 1190: 1183: 1179:File:HSLSphere new.jpg 306: 256:information technology 1356: 1189: 1182: 884:The question whether 551:). Or would the term 305: 243:WikiProject Computing 161:standards; visit the 83:level-5 vital article 2015:Proposed merge from 1741:regular verification 904:I agree with having 654:, a separate article 51:relevant style guide 47:varieties of English 1731:After February 2018 1350:Cone Contrast Space 1078:Thanks, it was fun. 49:. According to the 1785:InternetArchiveBot 1736:InternetArchiveBot 1354:From the article: 1191: 1184: 489:From the article: 479:From the article: 307: 274:Computing articles 92:content assessment 2007: 1957:sequential scales 1945:datavisualization 1761: 1582: 1519: 1502:comment added by 1466:comment added by 1440:is a good thing. 445:Untitled Comments 421: 420: 417: 416: 413: 412: 378:Computer graphics 369:computer graphics 341:Computer graphics 328: 327: 324: 323: 207: 206: 203: 202: 165:for more details. 140:WikiProject Color 61: 60: 2177: 2006: 2003: 1973:colorbrewer2.org 1969:diverging scales 1887: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1846: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1795: 1786: 1759: 1758: 1737: 1628:Real Color Wheel 1597:of color space. 1581: 1518: 1496: 1478: 1363:visual system. 1180: 854:CMYK color space 846:CMYK color model 782:RGB color system 389: 388: 385: 382: 379: 358: 351: 350: 345: 337: 330: 329: 276: 275: 272: 269: 266: 237: 230: 229: 224: 216: 209: 208: 179: 178: 175: 172: 169: 163:wikiproject page 134: 127: 126: 121: 113: 106: 105: 89: 80: 79: 72: 71: 63: 30:American English 26:This article is 23: 16: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2070: 2069: 2049: 2020: 2004: 1961:gradiant scales 1925: 1883: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1842: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1804: 1802:Merger proposal 1789: 1784: 1752: 1745:have permission 1735: 1689:this simple FaQ 1674: 1630: 1594: 1592:model or space? 1557:Suggest away! – 1540: 1538:Section headers 1497: 1484: 1461: 1458: 1414: 1375: 1352: 1338: 1280: 1254:define the term 1249:RGB color model 1245:RGB color space 1207: 1161: 1107: 910:RGB color space 906:RGB color model 869:RGB color model 858:RGB color space 850:RGB color space 842:RGB color model 822:RGB color model 810:RGB color space 806:RGB color model 778:RGB color model 774:RGB color space 766:RGB color model 762:RGB color space 705:RGB color model 701:RGB color space 658:HSV color space 652:RGB color space 648:RGB color model 629:Lab color space 569:Demonstration: 521:HSV color space 447: 431:151.199.131.100 426: 403:High-importance 386: 383: 380: 377: 376: 344:High‑importance 343: 273: 270: 267: 264: 263: 222: 193:High-importance 176: 173: 170: 167: 166: 120:High‑importance 119: 90:on Knowledge's 87: 77: 55:broad consensus 12: 11: 5: 2183: 2173: 2172: 2167: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2082: 2048: 2045: 2019: 2013: 1977:Cynthia Brewer 1949:rainbow scales 1924: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1803: 1800: 1779: 1778: 1771: 1724: 1723: 1715:Added archive 1713: 1705:Added archive 1703: 1695:Added archive 1673: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1568: 1567: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1483: 1480: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1391: 1390: 1374: 1371: 1351: 1348: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1279: 1278:Image too dark 1276: 1275: 1274: 1264: 1263: 1240: 1239: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1160: 1157: 1145: 1136: 1135: 1106: 1103: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1073: 1072: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1028: 1027: 1018: 1017: 1012: 1011: 1002: 1001: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 987: 969: 968: 967: 966: 956: 955: 943: 942: 898: 897: 881: 880: 837: 836: 832: 831: 826: 825: 784:or just plain 758: 757: 744: 743: 721: 720: 688: 687: 665: 655: 612:, rather than 598: 591: 590: 587: 584: 574: 573: 567: 557: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 495: 494: 487: 486: 477: 476: 446: 443: 425: 422: 419: 418: 415: 414: 411: 410: 399: 393: 392: 390: 373:the discussion 359: 347: 346: 338: 326: 325: 322: 321: 318:Mid-importance 308: 298: 297: 290:Low-importance 286: 280: 279: 277: 260:the discussion 238: 226: 225: 223:Low‑importance 217: 205: 204: 201: 200: 189: 183: 182: 180: 177:color articles 135: 123: 122: 114: 102: 101: 95: 73: 59: 58: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2182: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2163: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2153: 2151: 2148: 2146: 2143: 2141: 2138: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2029: 2025: 2018: 2012: 2011: 2008: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933:colors scales 1930: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1902: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1886: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1845: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1827: 1813: 1809: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1787: 1776: 1772: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1677: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1654: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1585: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544:188.223.18.19 1533: 1530: 1527: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1479: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468:203.214.49.35 1465: 1456:pure colours? 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1412: 1402: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1359: 1355: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1181: 1175: 1173: 1168: 1166: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1141: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1119: 1114: 1110: 1102: 1100: 1089: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1004: 1003: 998: 997: 988: 985: 980: 979: 976: 973: 972: 971: 970: 963: 960: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 939: 938: 937: 935: 930: 928: 924: 920: 916: 911: 907: 902: 895: 891: 887: 883: 882: 878: 874: 870: 867:based on the 866: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 838: 834: 833: 828: 827: 823: 820:point to the 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 802: 801: 799: 795: 790: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 755: 751: 746: 745: 740: 735: 734: 733: 731: 727: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 697: 696: 695: 693: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 666: 663: 659: 656: 653: 649: 646: 645: 644: 642: 638: 634: 630: 625: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 597: 594: 588: 585: 582: 581: 580: 577: 572: 568: 566: 562: 561: 560: 556: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 512: 508: 504: 499: 498: 497: 496: 492: 491: 490: 485: 482: 481: 480: 475: 472: 469: 464: 463: 462: 461: 455: 451: 442: 439: 436: 435: 432: 408: 404: 398: 395: 394: 391: 374: 370: 366: 365: 360: 357: 353: 352: 348: 342: 339: 336: 332: 331: 319: 316:(assessed as 315: 314: 304: 300: 299: 295: 291: 285: 282: 281: 278: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 244: 239: 236: 232: 231: 227: 221: 218: 215: 211: 210: 198: 194: 188: 185: 184: 181: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 147: 142: 141: 136: 133: 129: 128: 124: 118: 115: 112: 108: 107: 103: 99: 93: 85: 84: 74: 70: 65: 64: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 31: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2050: 2032: 2031: 2021: 1995:color scales 1992: 1985:color theory 1937:color scales 1926: 1923:Color scales 1903: 1884: 1882: 1860: 1843: 1841: 1837: 1815: 1805: 1783: 1780: 1755:source check 1734: 1728: 1725: 1678: 1675: 1631: 1599:86.31.69.235 1595: 1541: 1498:— Preceding 1494: 1488: 1485: 1459: 1437: 1415: 1376: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1342:Metallurgist 1339: 1281: 1253: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1172:Kasper Hviid 1169: 1164: 1162: 1153: 1149: 1144: 1137: 1126: 1115: 1111: 1108: 1095: 1048: 1043: 1032: 1029: 1006: 974: 961: 951: 947: 931: 903: 899: 861: 791: 769: 759: 738: 722: 689: 683: 679: 675: 661: 640: 639:say "...is 636: 632: 626: 620:redirect to 613: 609: 605: 601: 599: 595: 592: 578: 575: 558: 552: 532: 528: 518: 503:69.139.231.9 488: 483: 478: 456: 452: 448: 440: 437: 427: 402: 362: 311: 289: 241: 192: 153:articles to 144: 138: 98:WikiProjects 81: 42: 38: 34: 27: 2054:ITU-T H.273 1941:cartography 1929:color scale 1909:Mark viking 1812:Color space 1681:Color space 1653:color model 1614:Colorchaser 1575:improvement 1462:—Preceding 1409:Merge with 1294:Notinasnaid 1258:Notinasnaid 1140:Notinasnaid 1118:Notinasnaid 1099:Notinasnaid 927:color space 925:instead of 923:color model 919:color model 915:color space 890:color model 886:color space 865:color space 794:color model 713:color space 676:color space 641:color model 633:color model 622:color space 618:color model 614:color space 610:color model 606:color model 602:color space 533:color space 529:color model 28:written in 2074:Categories 1965:color ramp 1792:Report bug 1373:Remission? 424:Usefulness 2033:North8000 1981:semiotics 1885:North8000 1844:North8000 1775:this tool 1768:this tool 1638:Lbeaumont 1559:jacobolus 1526:jacobolus 1422:Adoniscik 1378:science. 1365:Drichters 1320:jacobolus 1132:Wapcaplet 975:Adobe RGB 934:Wapcaplet 877:Adobe RGB 798:Wapcaplet 730:Wapcaplet 692:Wapcaplet 468:jacobolus 265:Computing 252:computing 248:computers 220:Computing 86:is rated 1953:heat map 1781:Cheers.— 1658:DavRosen 1512:contribs 1504:Comptrol 1500:unsigned 1464:unsigned 1398:Lovibond 1380:Lovibond 1336:ISCC-NBS 1163:A color 563:Report: 450:wanted. 43:traveled 2058:Hym3242 1955:scale, 1685:my edit 1442:Tletnes 1438:as well 1040:channel 525:Maveric 405:on the 292:on the 195:on the 151:improve 88:C-class 39:defense 2005:(talk) 1989:source 1904:Oppose 1303:SharkD 1284:SharkD 1269:SharkD 1196:SharkD 1127:number 1044:number 948:really 770:should 531:and a 523:page. 254:, and 94:scale. 1808:Gamut 1579:Δρ.Κ. 1165:space 1088:Smyth 1069:Gutza 1050:Smyth 1024:Gutza 1007:model 894:Gutza 808:from 754:Gutza 742:flag. 726:gamut 717:Gutza 715:). -- 709:gamut 703:from 686:does) 684:model 680:space 662:model 553:gamut 168:Color 146:color 117:Color 75:This 35:color 2062:talk 2038:talk 1983:and 1913:talk 1891:talk 1850:talk 1810:and 1662:talk 1642:talk 1618:talk 1603:talk 1548:talk 1508:talk 1472:talk 1446:talk 1426:talk 1247:and 962:sRGB 875:and 873:sRGB 852:and 844:and 818:RGBA 816:and 776:and 764:and 750:sRGB 711:and 670:and 668:CMYK 664:..." 637:does 604:and 547:and 541:CMYK 507:talk 438:--- 397:High 187:High 157:and 155:good 2000:Yug 1975:by 1869:Zut 1864:Ren 1824:Zut 1819:Ren 1749:RfC 1719:to 1709:to 1699:to 1562:(t) 1529:(t) 1323:(t) 1234:PAR 1036:bit 984:RGB 952:the 929:?) 862:any 814:RGB 786:RGB 739:and 672:YUV 624:). 549:RGB 545:HSV 537:RGB 471:(t) 460:MRC 284:Low 159:1.0 2076:: 2064:) 2056:. 2040:) 1967:, 1951:, 1943:, 1935:, 1931:, 1915:) 1893:) 1852:) 1762:. 1757:}} 1753:{{ 1664:) 1644:) 1620:) 1605:) 1577:. 1550:) 1514:) 1510:• 1474:) 1448:) 1428:) 1159:3D 1022:-- 539:, 509:) 320:). 250:, 41:, 37:, 2060:( 2036:( 1997:? 1963:/ 1959:/ 1911:( 1889:( 1848:( 1794:) 1790:( 1777:. 1770:. 1660:( 1640:( 1616:( 1601:( 1546:( 1506:( 1470:( 1444:( 1424:( 1067:- 505:( 409:. 296:. 199:. 100:: 57:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index