149:
Back at the House of Lords, the Inland
Revenue accepted that wages in lieu of holiday had to be paid, but that the more generous procedure for claiming under ERA 1996 was not open, because the definition of wages in s 27 was comprehensive and did not cover working time claims. It was deliberately
113:
Workers were not paid for annual leave because they had had long-term illnesses. They requested that they be paid the holiday wage, which they could not take because they had been sick. One asked if she could take annual leave that she missed before, after she returned to work. The rest had been
140:
The
European Court of Justice held that legislation cannot allow that the right to take paid leave is extinguished at the end of the year if the worker does not work because of sickness. If employment is terminated then a worker is entitled to get an allowance of lieu according to Art 7(2). The
162:
regulation 14 was a sum payable to a worker in connection with employment, clearly within ERA 1996 s 27(1) and ‘holiday pay’ was there specifically. If it were not so, the principle of equivalence - that a no less favourable remedy would be available in national law as for EU law - would be
131:
The Court of Appeal held that a claim for deduction of holiday pay could not be brought as an unauthorised deduction from wages under ERA 1996, applying WTR rr 13 and 14. The House of Lords in
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth IRLR 465 referred the question to the ECJ.
232:
114:
dismissed. They were all refused requests for pay for holidays, the lady who returned because the law said three months after the year in which the leave fell. They made a claim for unauthorised deductions under the
421:
IRLR 959 (C-277/08) the CFI held provided that employees who fall sufficiently ill before/whilst on holiday are entitled to insist that "missed" holiday be 'reinstated' and taken at a later date.
141:
purpose of the
Directive, one of the most important social rights for workers, was to allow a period of rest and it was legitimate that if one was actually ill, there was no rest.
425:
417:
767:
378:
154:, regulation 30, which gives a time limit of three months only for each individual deduction, was not the only claim, and an action could be brought under the
363:
495:
118:
sections 13 (the right) and 23 (a limit of three months since last deduction, but workers can claim for the whole of the deductions).
777:
292:
787:
762:
525:
725:
192:
742:
500:
395:
262:
649:
606:
472:
247:
782:
41:
679:
539:
324:
772:
549:
534:
217:
159:
151:
102:
339:
329:
314:
299:
282:
267:
252:
237:
530:
350:
155:
115:
709:
544:
481:
689:
602:
185:
654:
510:
411:
277:
98:
67:
633:
629:
611:
221:
615:
583:
465:
208:
8:
730:
178:
90:
684:
664:
624:
588:
579:
570:
384:
353:
597:
669:
620:
592:
574:
369:
86:
37:
694:
554:
458:
756:
659:
406:
94:
450:
704:
674:
170:
505:
150:
never amended. Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Lord
Neuberger held that the
699:
520:
515:
380:
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and
Learning Act 2009
754:
365:Russell v Transocean International Resources Ltd
768:Court of Justice of the European Union case law
83:Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund
480:
466:
186:
135:
77:Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Stringer
200:
473:
459:
193:
179:
294:Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd
755:
454:
174:
726:Legal services in the United Kingdom
13:
396:Working time in the United Kingdom
126:
14:
799:
310:HM Revenue and Customs v Stringer
144:
248:Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
778:2009 in United Kingdom case law
788:European Union labour case law
763:United Kingdom labour case law
439:
325:Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Jaeger
1:
218:Working Time Regulations 1998
160:Working Time Regulations 1998
152:Working Time Regulations 1998
103:Working Time Regulations 1998
340:Barber v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd
101:, which is relevant for the
7:
743:United Kingdom law category
263:Commission v United Kingdom
166:
121:
10:
804:
607:English administrative law
426:Lyons v Mitie Security Ltd
351:Employment Rights Act 1996
156:Employment Rights Act 1996
116:Employment Rights Act 1996
739:
718:
642:
563:
496:Parliamentary sovereignty
488:
482:Law of the United Kingdom
418:Pereda v Madrid Movilidad
392:
376:
360:
348:
336:
321:
306:
289:
274:
259:
244:
229:
215:
206:
136:European Court of Justice
66:
61:
53:
48:
33:
29:European Court of Justice
25:
20:
433:
108:
634:English civil procedure
511:Law of Northern Ireland
201:Sources on working time
783:HM Revenue and Customs
650:British Virgin Islands
412:Working Time Directive
278:R v DTI ex parte BECTU
158:. A payment under the
99:Working Time Directive
68:Working Time Directive
773:House of Lords cases
616:English criminal law
584:English contract law
209:Directive 2003/88/EC
97:case concerning the
91:European labour law
40:, IRLR 214 (also,
625:English family law
501:Constitutional law
750:
749:
731:British penal law
402:
401:
73:
72:
795:
710:English case law
593:English land law
575:English tort law
475:
468:
461:
452:
451:
446:
443:
381:
366:
295:
195:
188:
181:
172:
171:
18:
17:
803:
802:
798:
797:
796:
794:
793:
792:
753:
752:
751:
746:
735:
714:
695:Anglo-Saxon law
643:Related systems
638:
564:Parallel fields
559:
555:Retained EU law
540:Competition law
526:Civil liberties
484:
479:
449:
444:
440:
436:
403:
398:
388:
379:
372:
364:
356:
344:
332:
317:
302:
293:
285:
270:
255:
240:
225:
211:
202:
199:
169:
147:
138:
129:
127:Court of Appeal
124:
111:
21:Stringer v HMRC
12:
11:
5:
801:
791:
790:
785:
780:
775:
770:
765:
748:
747:
740:
737:
736:
734:
733:
728:
722:
720:
716:
715:
713:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
682:
677:
672:
667:
665:European Union
662:
657:
652:
646:
644:
640:
639:
637:
636:
627:
618:
609:
600:
595:
586:
577:
567:
565:
561:
560:
558:
557:
552:
550:Commercial law
547:
542:
537:
535:insolvency law
528:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
492:
490:
486:
485:
478:
477:
470:
463:
455:
448:
447:
437:
435:
432:
431:
430:
422:
414:
409:
400:
399:
393:
390:
389:
377:
374:
373:
361:
358:
357:
349:
346:
345:
337:
334:
333:
322:
319:
318:
307:
304:
303:
290:
287:
286:
275:
272:
271:
260:
257:
256:
245:
242:
241:
230:
227:
226:
216:
213:
212:
207:
204:
203:
198:
197:
190:
183:
175:
168:
165:
146:
145:House of Lords
143:
137:
134:
128:
125:
123:
120:
110:
107:
71:
70:
64:
63:
59:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:
45:
35:
31:
30:
27:
23:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
800:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
760:
758:
745:
744:
738:
732:
729:
727:
724:
723:
721:
717:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
690:United States
688:
686:
683:
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
647:
645:
641:
635:
631:
628:
626:
622:
619:
617:
613:
610:
608:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
590:
587:
585:
581:
578:
576:
572:
569:
568:
566:
562:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
532:
529:
527:
524:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
491:
489:Common fields
487:
483:
476:
471:
469:
464:
462:
457:
456:
453:
442:
438:
428:
427:
423:
420:
419:
415:
413:
410:
408:
407:UK labour law
405:
404:
397:
391:
386:
382:
375:
371:
368:
367:
359:
355:
352:
347:
342:
341:
335:
331:
327:
326:
320:
316:
312:
311:
305:
301:
297:
296:
288:
284:
280:
279:
273:
269:
265:
264:
258:
254:
250:
249:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:SIMAP v CSCGV
228:
223:
219:
214:
210:
205:
196:
191:
189:
184:
182:
177:
176:
173:
164:
161:
157:
153:
142:
133:
119:
117:
106:
104:
100:
96:
95:UK labour law
92:
88:
85:
84:
79:
78:
69:
65:
60:
56:
52:
47:
44:and C-350/06)
43:
39:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
16:
741:
571:Scots delict
445:EWCA Civ 441
441:
424:
416:
362:
338:
323:
309:
308:
291:
276:
261:
246:
231:
222:SI 1998/1833
148:
139:
130:
112:
82:
81:
76:
75:
74:
57:EWCA Civ 441
54:Prior action
49:Case history
15:
685:New Zealand
506:English law
163:infringed.
757:Categories
700:Common law
545:Labour law
670:Hong Kong
655:Australia
521:Welsh law
516:Scots law
34:Citations
719:See also
429:IRLR 288
354:ss 50-70
330:C-151/02
315:C-520/06
300:C-131/04
283:C-173/99
268:C-484/04
253:C-397/01
238:C-303/98
167:See also
122:Judgment
62:Keywords
42:C-520/06
680:Ireland
531:Company
370:UKSC 57
343:ICR 679
328:(2003)
313:(2009)
298:(2006)
281:(2001)
266:(2006)
251:(2005)
236:(2000)
87:UKHL 31
38:UKHL 31
705:Equity
660:Canada
598:Trusts
675:India
630:Scots
621:Scots
612:Scots
603:Scots
589:Scots
580:Scots
434:Notes
109:Facts
89:is a
26:Court
632:and
623:and
614:and
605:and
591:and
582:and
573:and
533:and
394:see
385:c 22
93:and
80:and
759::
105:.
474:e
467:t
460:v
387:)
383:(
224:)
220:(
194:e
187:t
180:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.