384:
also considered to have more of a developmental intent than an administrative intent, such as in a performance appraisal. One difference in organizational and/or project management is that the debriefing process is not only conducted after the conclusion of other events, but can also be conducted in real-time to continuously evolve plans during execution. The main reason for focusing on debriefing in an organizational or even in a project management capacity, is to increase effectiveness of the team, both individually and collectively. One study found that properly conducted debriefings can help organizations realize individual and team performance improvements by about 20-25%.
336:
trial of debriefing for consecutive subjects admitted to the hospital following a traffic accident. The patients were assessed in the hospital using the Impact of Event Scale (IES), Brief
Symptom Inventory (BSI) and a questionnaire, and were then reassessed at 3 years and 3 months. The intervention used was psychological debriefing. The results showed that the intervention group had significantly worse psychiatric symptoms, travel anxiety, physical problems, and financial problems.
451:
team of doctors to be high-performing in coming up with innovative solutions to health problems while maintaining the patients quality of life. Debriefings in the health care field are becoming increasingly popular and more widely used after claims of malpractice in emergency departments were reviewed and over 50 cases examined that showed how a high-performing team could have eliminated or mitigated major problems including death and impairments.
36:
250:
unit. It also provides them with an outlet rather than forcing them to become consumed by their thoughts. Typically, the role of a soldier is seen as a job and a courageous duty, which does not give value to the psychological and emotional need of reflection. Conclusively, in order to make the role of a soldier more sustainable, captains and group leaders must prioritize debriefing strategies to focus more on the whole person.
475:
key characteristics of effective and ineffective developmental interactions shows that interactions that allow someone to discover their own needs and come up with workable solutions are more effective than those where a leader tells the team what they need. Leaders should perform participative debriefs and give their team members the opportunity to reflect, discuss, and share their own perspectives before providing direction.
177:
145:
in the determination of success or failure of the operation. The processes may involve receiving an explanation; receiving information and situation-based reminders of context; and reporting of measures of performance, and/or opportunities to further investigate the results of a study, investigation, or assessment of performance after participation in an immersive activity is complete.
447:(KSAs) significantly when conducted formally using pre-defined measures of performance derived from front-end analysis. Debriefing organization can be based on linear or non-linear (or a combination of both) organization of markers used for recall. Typically the structure will use: Temporal, Spatial, Objective, and/or Performance derived markers to bring focus to a specific activity.
259:
adequate sequence that let the participants reflect what happened, giving important insights with the aim of that project towards the future, linking the challenge with the actions and the future." It is analogous to "providing feedback" as it constitutes a vital component of any simulation intervention or any educational intervention, involving a process of explanation,
847:"Yturralde's Debriefing Model of the 4 Elements: Water, Air, Earth and Fire", Association for Challenge Course Technology 22nd Conference at Boston, Massachusetts, on February 2012 and presented at the Association for Experiential Education International Conference at Colombia in June 2012. Yturralde, Ernesto. "Andragogía…¿ Qué es la Andragogía."
462:
Many leaders display all of the correct skills for successful leadership including interpersonal skills, technical competence, etc., but lack a very important skill which is the ability to effectively debrief and ensure continuous learning of their team. Without guidance or structure for an effective
435:
was performed to determine whether there is a consistent improvement in team effectiveness using debriefing techniques. Meta-analysis are statistical researching technique that include data from findings of all prior studies and are considered to be more reliable than findings that are derived from a
383:
Debriefing in the business discipline is largely instrumental to project management, particularly in "accelerating projects, innovating novel approaches, and hitting difficult objectives." Debriefs are considered to primarily serve developmental purposes rather than evaluative or judgmental. They are
374:
Methodological advantages of a debriefing include "the ability of researchers to check the effectiveness of a manipulation, or to identify participants who were able to guess the hypothesis or spot a deception." If the data have been compromised in this way, then those participants should be excluded
474:
Be sure to involve the team in discussions surrounding team effectiveness and allow the team to establish their own action plans. It is important to gather the perspective of the people who are most involved so that subsequent decisions are made with complete information. A study which discusses the
450:
Teams in occupations and high-risk settings such as the healthcare field, emergency services like fire-fighting and policing, and military settings frequently use debriefing techniques for team learning and to avoid making costly mistakes. For example, in the health care field, it is important for a
188:
Throughout the existence of combat and the history of war, engaging with the emotional and psychological impact on soldiers has been an ongoing and conflicting conversation. Debriefings in the military originated for three purposes: to mitigate the psychological impact of traumatic events, alleviate
144:
The popular meaning of debriefing is that "of telling about what has happened" with a sense of reviewing or going over an experience or actions in order to achieve order and meaning concerning what was reported. It is a structured process that also evaluates the contributions of various participants
339:
In an earlier study conducted by
Carlier et al. in 1998, they looked at the symptomatology in police officers that had been debriefed and not debriefed following a civilian plane crash. The results showed that the two groups did not differ in pre-event or post event distress. Furthermore, those who
296:
find that psychological debriefing is unhelpful and is potentially harmful. A 2019 Cochrane
Systematic Review found low-quality evidence suggesting potential benefit for some people, however, the studies performed had a high degree of uncertainty due to bias and the evidence is not strong enough to
217:
refers to the process of collecting historical patterns of trauma through the use of group therapy. This process happens with soldiers recounting combat events in chronological order and adding their own reactions of thoughts and feelings. The key objective of this strategy is to allow men to "talk
148:
Aside from the goal of inciting reflection and encourage communication, debriefing is also used to explore the emotions of the participant. This variable helps frame the experience in such a way that it enhances the learning. Effective debriefings typically include the following essential elements:
470:
Avoid discussing task work issues, and instead, focus on addressing teamwork issues. Teamwork is especially important when team members need to rely on each other for information or support to see the project through. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes found that teams that function effectively
249:
All of these debriefing strategies maximize on the collective experience of soldiers, rather than on the individual. There is a growing belief that allowing soldiers to reflect and problem-solve as a group builds their relationship with each other over time and ultimately, their effectiveness as a
244:
is similar to the other debriefing strategies in that it focuses on the group narrative, however it differs because it prioritizes the leadership and effectiveness of the facilitators who lead the debriefing sessions. These facilitators are provided with professional development on how to plan for
224:
is a form of psychological debriefing that features a specific structure and format, which were developed to address critical incident stress experienced by emergency service workers. It was developed by
Jeffrey Mitchell and is considered the most widely used today. It operates using the following
478:
Debriefs should not only be effective but must be efficient as well. Teams can easily get into the weeds and spend valuable time discussing topics that can be taken offline or tabled for a later discussion. Spending too much time covering topics that do not add value to the project can discourage
135:
is a report of a mission or project or the information so obtained. It is a structured process following an exercise or event that reviews the actions taken. As a technical term, it implies a specific and active intervention process that has developed with more formal meanings such as operational
335:
The goal of this type of debriefing is to stop the individuals from developing PTSD. Although this debriefing is widely used, there is uncertainty how it affects an individual. Researchers Mayou, Ehlers and Hobbs in 2000 were interested in evaluating the 3-year results of a randomized controlled
418:
Digital tools have emerged aiming to automate the preparation of a debriefing session, based on the anonymous answers to questions asked of individual team members. This information can then be used to generate a discussion guide for the person in charge of the debrief to guide that particular
258:
Ernesto
Yturralde, experiential trainer and researcher, explains: "In the field of experiential learning methodology, the debriefing is a semi-structured process by which the facilitator, once a certain activity is accomplished, makes a series of progressive questions in this session, with an
308:
Critical
Incident Stress Debriefing is a crisis intervention program that is used to provide initial psychosocial relief to rescue workers. It is generally conducted in a group session and held between 24 and 72 hours of the disaster. Each debriefing session follows seven phases:
245:
and lead the group sessions. In cases of deception-based experiences where the participant was manipulated or provided with false information, the process include a discussion with the participant how the deception might have temporarily altered or influenced his self-perceptions.
427:
Studies show that when done correctly, debriefs work; and teams that practice regular debriefing outperform teams who do not by about 25%. This demonstrates how debriefing can put a team on the fast-track to practical and observed learning and ensure team effectiveness.
975:
Gartlehner, Gerald; Forneris, Catherine A.; Brownley, Kimberly A.; Gaynes, Bradley N.; Sonis, Jeffrey; Coker-Schwimmer, Emmanuel; Jonas, Daniel E.; Greenblatt, Amy; Wilkins, Tania M.; Woodell, Carol L.; Lohr, Kathleen N. (2013). "Discussion".
409:
Often, structuring debriefings by following a plan or outline visiting the main functions of the debriefing process are considered more efficient. Most debriefings require at least some planning and organization prior to assembly of the team.
343:
Overall, these results showed that caution should be used when using
Critical Incident Stress Debriefing. Studies have shown that it is ineffective and has adverse long-term effects, and is not an appropriate treatment for trauma victims.
1797:
37. Calle-Domínguez, C. (2022)Debriefing entre iguales como herramienta de aprendizaje para la formación de enfermeras experiencia en postgrado de emergencias hospitalarias . Madrid: Universidad
Europea de Madrid. Recuperado a partir de:
1723:
LePine, Jeffery A.; Piccolo, Ronald F.; Jackson, Christine L.; Mathieu, John E.; Saul, Jessica R. (June 2008). "A Meta-Analysis of
Teamwork Processes: Tests of a Multidimensional Model and Relationships with Team Effectiveness Criteria".
291:
in an effort to prevent PTSD, which consists of interviews that are meant to allow individuals to directly confront the event and share their feelings with the counselor and to help structure their memories of the event. However, several
732:
The
Practices and Procedures of the Investigating Services of the Department of Defense and the Military Departments Concerning the Investigations Into the Deaths of Military Personnel Which May Have Resulted from Self-Inflicted
237:
occur usually at least 24 hours after an incident to give the soldiers a bit more time to deescalate from a having high stress response to that incident. The process is peer-driven but backed-up by a group of professional
419:
session. There is also an emergent debriefing model called "digital debriefing", which involves video-facilitated instructor debriefing. Due to the technologies used, this type of debriefing can be conducted remotely.
363:. The debriefing is an important ethical consideration to make sure that participants are fully informed about, and not psychologically or physically harmed in any way by, their experience in an experiment. Along with
218:
it out" in a way that they are not commonly socialized to do so. Though this group therapy process does not aim to reduce stress, it has resulted in providing a feeling of relief and connection amongst the soldiers.
1636:
Risser, Daniel T; Rice, Matthew M; Salisbury, Mary L; Simon, Robert; Jay, Gregory D; Berns, Scott D (September 1999). "The Potential for Improved Teamwork to Reduce Medical Errors in the Emergency Department".
1185:
Carlier, Ingrid V. E.; Lamberts, Regina D.; Van Uchelen, Annephine J.; Gersons, Berthold P. R. (1998). "Disaster-related post-traumatic stress in police officers: a field study of the impact of debriefing".
1805:
1272:
1804:
38. Calle-Domínguez, C. Evaluación y satisfacción del debriefing facilitado por un instructor frente al facilitado por iguales. Metas de Enfermería. 2022; 25 (6):15-23. Recuperado a partir de:
371:
experiments that use deception. Debriefing is typically not used in surveys, observational studies, or other forms of research that involve no deception and minimal risk to participants.
1498:
1330:
439:
Debriefings are most effective when conducted interactively between the participants of the immersive activity and the assessment or observation personnel. Self-facilitated
471:
are more committed, believe they can succeed, and ultimately are about 25% more successful which supports why debrief sessions should include an examination of teamwork.
1001:
Feldner MT, Monson CM, Friedman MJ (2007). "A critical analysis of approaches to targeted PTSD prevention: current status and theoretically derived future directions".
233:
entails brief discussions and unstructured therapy sessions that occur within a few hours of an incident that may cause high stress responses in soldiers. Finally,
454:
Several examples of low-risk teams that can benefit from debriefing include: project teams, sports teams, production or manufacturing teams, and consultant teams.
1806:
https://www.enfermeria21.com/revistas/metas/articulo/81957/evaluacion-y-satisfaccion-del-debriefing-facilitado-por-un-instructor-frente-al-facilitado-por-iguales/
375:
from the analysis. Many psychologists feel that these benefits justify a postexperimental follow-up even in the absence of deception or stressful procedures.
593:"Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and Rationale for a Blended Approach to Health Care Simulation Debriefing"
1156:
17:
1269:
1680:
Dismukes, R. Key; McDonnell, Lori K.; Jobe, Kimberly K. (January 2000). "Facilitating LOFT Debriefings: Instructor Techniques and Crew Participation".
831:
577:
356:, a debriefing is a short interview that takes place between researchers and research participants immediately following their participation in a
193:, also known as PTSD. Though there are several types of debriefing strategies, the following three are frequently used within military groups:
1314:
Aronson, E.; Wilson, T. D.; Brewer, M. B. (1998). "Experimentation in social psychology". In D. T. Gilbert; S. T. Fiske; G. Lindzey (eds.).
466:
Below are some ways to maximize team effectiveness, avoid the common challenges faced in debriefing, and maintain high team performance:
1446:
Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Cerasoli, Christopher P. (February 2013). "Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis".
367:, the debriefing is considered to be a fundamental ethical precaution in research involving human beings. It is especially important in
1199:
282:
1570:
Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Cerasoli, Christopher P. (2012-06-04). "Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis".
1395:
Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Cerasoli, Christopher P. (2013-02-01). "Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis".
136:
debriefing. It is classified into different types, which include military, experiential, and psychological debriefing, among others.
1334:
554:
Nursing Education, Administration, and Informatics: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice
229:
refers to the education and coping mechanisms taught to those who are more vulnerable to traumatization before they enter combat.
463:
debriefing process, it is more likely that leaders will experience some of the common challenges that are found in debriefing.
1554:
1529:
1298:
897:
765:
740:
714:
561:
266:"Emotional Decompression" is one style of psychological debriefing proposed by David Kinchin in his 2007 book by that name.
1363:
297:
recommend multiple sessions of early psychological interventions for all people who are exposed to trauma. As of 2017 The
979:
Interventions for the Prevention of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults After Exposure to Psychological Trauma
436:
single study. This one fully supports the idea that debriefing is a key component of successful project team management.
100:
536:
298:
72:
1099:
Roberts, Neil P.; Kitchiner, Neil J.; Kenardy, Justin; Robertson, Lindsay; Lewis, Catrin; Bisson, Jonathan I. (2019).
870:
119:
1823:
Berscheid, E., Abrahams, D., & Aronson, V. (1967). Effectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments.
180:
Female intelligence officer at the Royal Air Force Station receiving a report from members of the crew of G George,
1854:
444:
443:(AAR) or debriefings are common in small unit and crew activities, and in a training context are shown to improve
79:
1864:
1837:
Pavlov, O., K. Saeed, and L. Robinson. (2015) “Improving Instructional Simulation with Structural Debriefing.”
368:
57:
190:
86:
1869:
1859:
1759:
Eddy, Erik R.; D'Abate, Caroline P.; Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Givens-Skeaton, Susan; Robinson, Greg (2006).
1101:"Multiple session early psychological interventions for the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder"
53:
889:
A Guide to Psychological Debriefing: Managing Emotional Decompression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
1163:. Society of Clinical Psychology: Division 12 of The American Psychological Association. 19 August 2014
68:
225:
three components: pre-incident functions, on-scene support services, and post-incident interventions.
176:
1015:
1874:
46:
921:
Fanning, Ruth M.; Gaba, David M. (2007). "The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning".
1010:
528:
782:
655:"Time-Driven Battlemind Psychological Debriefing: A Group-Level Early Intervention in Combat"
520:
328:
educational phase to learn about post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and coping strategies
1799:
8:
440:
340:
had undergone debriefing had significantly more disaster-related hyper arousal symptoms.
93:
1705:
1603:
1479:
1428:
1133:
1100:
1076:
1055:
1036:
954:
630:
571:
270:
1650:
1782:
1741:
1737:
1697:
1662:
1654:
1595:
1587:
1550:
1525:
1471:
1463:
1420:
1412:
1371:
1294:
1252:
1244:
1203:
1138:
1120:
1081:
1028:
983:
946:
938:
903:
893:
866:
812:
804:
761:
736:
710:
684:
676:
622:
614:
557:
532:
521:
1709:
1607:
1483:
1432:
1040:
958:
634:
1772:
1733:
1689:
1646:
1579:
1455:
1404:
1234:
1195:
1128:
1116:
1112:
1071:
1063:
1020:
930:
794:
666:
604:
516:
364:
331:
re-entry phase to discuss any other issues and to provide any additional services.
1276:
934:
923:
Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
887:
609:
592:
1693:
799:
1056:"Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)"
977:
181:
1067:
1848:
1786:
1761:"Key characteristics of effective and ineffective developmental interactions"
1745:
1701:
1658:
1591:
1583:
1467:
1459:
1416:
1408:
1375:
1248:
1207:
1124:
1024:
942:
907:
808:
680:
671:
654:
618:
489:
432:
293:
1666:
1599:
1475:
1424:
1256:
1142:
1085:
1032:
987:
950:
816:
688:
626:
1547:
Clinical Simulation: Education, Operations and Engineering, Second Edition
1270:
Code of Ethics and Conduct, 3.4, 20 from the British Psychological Society
1239:
1222:
1200:
10.1002/(sici)1099-1700(199807)14:3<143::aid-smi770>3.0.co;2-s
392:
Fundamentally, key questions to consider during a debriefing session are:
1328:
783:"Evaluation of Stress Debriefing Interventions with Military Populations"
1520:
Konstantinidis, Stathis Th; Bamidis, Panagiotis D.; Zary, Nabil (2020).
153:
Active participation with more than just the passive receipt of feedback
1758:
360:
357:
353:
1777:
1760:
1572:
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
1497:
Reyes, Denise L.; Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Salas, Eduardo (2018-03-22).
35:
1364:"Debriefing: A Simple Tool to Help Your Team Tackle Tough Problems"
653:
Adler, Amy B.; Castro, Carl Andrew; McGurk, Dennis (January 2009).
263:, and synthesis, with an active facilitator-participant interface.
260:
184:
of 460 Squadron RAAF, after an attack on Berlin, 26 November 1943.
1184:
1098:
974:
322:
reaction phase to discuss emotions associated with what happened
269:
Experiential learning debriefing is the basis for debriefing in
27:
Report back and review on a project or mission after completion
863:
Quality of Anesthesia Care, An Issue of Anesthesiology Clinics
1157:"Psychological Debriefing for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder"
1818:
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
1223:"Psychological debriefing for road traffic accident victims"
756:
Crano, William D.; Brewer, Marilynn B.; Lac, Andrew (2014).
1722:
1820:. (6th ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Society
1053:
325:
symptoms phase to learn the signs and symptoms of distress
287:
Trauma-exposed individuals often receive treatment called
1519:
929:(2). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health): 115–125.
1635:
1522:
Digital Innovations in Healthcare Education and Training
758:
Principles and Methods of Social Research, Third Edition
156:
Developmental intent focused on learning and improvement
1800:
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=310220
1180:
1178:
865:. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company. p. 17.
707:
Psychological Debriefing: Theory, Practice and Evidence
552:
Resources, Management Association, Information (2018).
523:
Psychological Debriefing: Theory, Practice and Evidence
319:
cognition phase to discuss thoughts about what happened
1329:
Professional Practice Board Working Party (May 2002).
1679:
1054:
Rose, S; Bisson, J; Churchill, R; Wessely, S (2002).
1000:
1832:
Psychological debriefing and emotional decompression
1496:
1175:
709:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 2.
303:
No Research Support/Treatment is Potentially Harmful
1313:
982:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
735:. Washington, D.C.: DIANE Publishing. p. 148.
189:acute stress response, and reduce the frequency of
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1569:
1445:
1394:
527:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.
1839:Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal
652:
1846:
1682:The International Journal of Aviation Psychology
1220:
1333:. British Psychological Society. Archived from
1233:(6). Royal College of Psychiatrists: 589–593.
860:
755:
405:What should we start, stop, or continue doing?
704:
515:
1825:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1816:American Psychological Association. (2011).
1221:Mayou, R. A.; Ehlers, A.; Hobbs, M. (2000).
576:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1623:CADS Validation Statistical Report (Rev. 4)
1499:"Team Development: The Power of Debriefing"
1357:
1355:
1105:The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
1060:The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
994:
970:
968:
920:
914:
590:
861:Neuman, Mark; Martinez, Elizabeth (2011).
591:Eppich, Walter; Cheng, Adam (April 2015).
422:
399:Where did we hit (or miss) our objectives?
222:Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD)
1776:
1238:
1132:
1075:
1014:
798:
780:
670:
608:
551:
347:
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
1544:
1361:
1352:
1293:. Delhi: Pearson Education. p. 71.
965:
729:
705:Raphael, Beverley; Wilson, John (2000).
556:. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. p. 240.
253:
175:
885:
14:
1847:
1549:. London: Academic Press. p. 28.
1524:. London: Academic Press. p. 24.
1288:
832:"Battlemind Psychological Debriefings"
781:MacDonald, Catherine M. (2003-12-01).
276:
1620:
829:
316:fact phase to establish what happened
301:assessed psychological debriefing as
1834:. London:Jessica Kingsley Publishers
1765:Human Resource Development Quarterly
760:. New York: Routledge. p. 432.
700:
698:
648:
646:
644:
511:
509:
507:
505:
457:
58:adding citations to reliable sources
29:
203:critical incident stress debriefing
24:
18:Critical Incident Stress Debriefing
1810:
396:What were we trying to accomplish?
299:American Psychological Association
25:
1886:
1316:The handbook of social psychology
695:
641:
502:
479:future participation in debriefs.
378:
273:, used widely within healthcare.
1738:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
830:Adler, Dr. Amy (April 2, 2007).
445:Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
34:
1752:
1716:
1673:
1629:
1614:
1563:
1538:
1513:
1490:
1439:
1388:
1322:
1307:
1282:
1263:
1214:
1149:
1092:
1047:
892:. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
879:
854:
841:
45:needs additional citations for
1117:10.1002/14651858.CD006869.pub3
823:
774:
749:
723:
584:
545:
191:post-traumatic stress disorder
13:
1:
1651:10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70134-4
1362:Sundheim, Doug (2015-07-02).
1227:British Journal of Psychiatry
495:
413:
387:
159:Discussion of specific events
1639:Annals of Emergency Medicine
1318:. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
935:10.1097/sih.0b013e3180315539
610:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072
198:historical group debriefing,
7:
1694:10.1207/s15327108ijap1001_3
483:
235:post-incident interventions
215:Historical Group Debriefing
171:
162:Input from multiple sources
10:
1891:
1331:"Psychological Debriefing"
280:
1545:Chiniara, Gilles (2019).
1068:10.1002/14651858.CD000560
800:10.1093/milmed/168.12.961
313:Introduction to set rules
231:On-scene support services
1584:10.1177/0018720812448394
1460:10.1177/0018720812448394
1409:10.1177/0018720812448394
1279:Retrieved March 7, 2018.
1025:10.1177/0145445506295057
730:Thurmond, Strom (1998).
672:10.7205/MILMED-D-00-2208
597:Simulation in Healthcare
402:What caused our results?
289:psychological debriefing
283:Psychological debriefing
166:
139:
1855:Experimental psychology
1841:. v. 46 (3-4): 383–403.
1830:Kinchin, David, (2007)
1368:Harvard Business Review
886:Kinchin, David (2007).
519:; Wilson, John (2003).
423:Efficacy and challenges
1289:Husain, Akbar (2012).
354:psychological research
348:Psychological research
227:Pre-incident functions
185:
1865:Experiential learning
1621:Blanchard, James W.,
1503:People & Strategy
1240:10.1192/bjp.176.6.589
1194:(3). Wiley: 143–148.
254:Experiential learning
179:
1726:Personnel Psychology
441:after action reviews
54:improve this article
1870:Military psychology
277:Crisis intervention
1860:Military doctrines
1275:2018-03-07 at the
271:Medical Simulation
242:Process Debriefing
208:process debriefing
186:
1778:10.1002/hrdq.1161
1556:978-0-12-815657-5
1531:978-0-12-813144-2
1300:978-81-317-6000-0
1291:Social Psychology
899:978-1-84642-661-2
787:Military Medicine
767:978-1-317-66607-3
742:978-0-7881-4236-9
716:978-0-521-64700-7
659:Military Medicine
563:978-1-5225-5491-2
517:Raphael, Beverley
458:Common challenges
369:social psychology
130:
129:
122:
104:
16:(Redirected from
1882:
1791:
1790:
1780:
1756:
1750:
1749:
1720:
1714:
1713:
1677:
1671:
1670:
1633:
1627:
1626:
1618:
1612:
1611:
1567:
1561:
1560:
1542:
1536:
1535:
1517:
1511:
1510:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1443:
1437:
1436:
1392:
1386:
1385:
1383:
1382:
1359:
1350:
1349:
1347:
1345:
1339:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1311:
1305:
1304:
1286:
1280:
1267:
1261:
1260:
1242:
1218:
1212:
1211:
1182:
1173:
1172:
1170:
1168:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1136:
1096:
1090:
1089:
1079:
1051:
1045:
1044:
1018:
998:
992:
991:
972:
963:
962:
918:
912:
911:
883:
877:
876:
858:
852:
845:
839:
838:
836:
827:
821:
820:
802:
778:
772:
771:
753:
747:
746:
727:
721:
720:
702:
693:
692:
674:
650:
639:
638:
612:
588:
582:
581:
575:
567:
549:
543:
542:
526:
513:
365:informed consent
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
38:
30:
21:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1875:Research ethics
1845:
1844:
1813:
1811:Further reading
1795:
1794:
1757:
1753:
1721:
1717:
1678:
1674:
1634:
1630:
1619:
1615:
1568:
1564:
1557:
1543:
1539:
1532:
1518:
1514:
1495:
1491:
1444:
1440:
1393:
1389:
1380:
1378:
1360:
1353:
1343:
1341:
1337:
1327:
1323:
1312:
1308:
1301:
1287:
1283:
1277:Wayback Machine
1268:
1264:
1219:
1215:
1188:Stress Medicine
1183:
1176:
1166:
1164:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1111:(8): CD006869.
1097:
1093:
1062:(2): CD000560.
1052:
1048:
1016:10.1.1.595.9186
999:
995:
973:
966:
919:
915:
900:
884:
880:
873:
859:
855:
846:
842:
834:
828:
824:
793:(12): 961–968.
779:
775:
768:
754:
750:
743:
728:
724:
717:
703:
696:
651:
642:
589:
585:
569:
568:
564:
550:
546:
539:
514:
503:
498:
486:
460:
425:
416:
390:
381:
350:
285:
279:
256:
174:
169:
142:
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
51:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1888:
1878:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1843:
1842:
1835:
1828:
1821:
1812:
1809:
1793:
1792:
1751:
1732:(2): 273–307.
1715:
1672:
1645:(3): 373–383.
1628:
1613:
1578:(1): 231–245.
1562:
1555:
1537:
1530:
1512:
1489:
1454:(1): 231–245.
1438:
1403:(1): 231–245.
1387:
1351:
1321:
1306:
1299:
1281:
1262:
1213:
1174:
1148:
1091:
1046:
993:
964:
913:
898:
878:
871:
853:
840:
822:
773:
766:
748:
741:
722:
715:
694:
665:(1): 021–028.
640:
603:(2): 106–115.
583:
562:
544:
538:978-0521647007
537:
500:
499:
497:
494:
493:
492:
485:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
459:
456:
424:
421:
415:
412:
407:
406:
403:
400:
397:
389:
386:
380:
379:Organizational
377:
349:
346:
333:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
278:
275:
255:
252:
247:
246:
239:
219:
211:
210:
205:
200:
182:Avro Lancaster
173:
170:
168:
165:
164:
163:
160:
157:
154:
141:
138:
128:
127:
110:September 2018
42:
40:
33:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1887:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1840:
1836:
1833:
1829:
1827:, 6, 371–380.
1826:
1822:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1808:
1807:
1802:
1801:
1788:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1755:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1719:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1676:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1632:
1624:
1617:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1566:
1558:
1552:
1548:
1541:
1533:
1527:
1523:
1516:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1493:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1448:Human Factors
1442:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:Human Factors
1391:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1358:
1356:
1340:on 2007-09-27
1336:
1332:
1325:
1317:
1310:
1302:
1296:
1292:
1285:
1278:
1274:
1271:
1266:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1217:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1181:
1179:
1162:
1161:www.div12.org
1158:
1152:
1144:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1095:
1087:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1050:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1009:(1): 80–116.
1008:
1004:
997:
989:
985:
981:
980:
971:
969:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
917:
909:
905:
901:
895:
891:
890:
882:
874:
872:9781455704194
868:
864:
857:
850:
849:Recuperado el
844:
833:
826:
818:
814:
810:
806:
801:
796:
792:
788:
784:
777:
769:
763:
759:
752:
744:
738:
734:
726:
718:
712:
708:
701:
699:
690:
686:
682:
678:
673:
668:
664:
660:
656:
649:
647:
645:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
611:
606:
602:
598:
594:
587:
579:
573:
565:
559:
555:
548:
540:
534:
530:
525:
524:
518:
512:
510:
508:
506:
501:
491:
490:Briefing note
488:
487:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
464:
455:
452:
448:
446:
442:
437:
434:
433:meta-analysis
429:
420:
411:
404:
401:
398:
395:
394:
393:
385:
376:
372:
370:
366:
362:
359:
355:
345:
341:
337:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
311:
310:
306:
304:
300:
295:
294:meta-analyses
290:
284:
274:
272:
267:
264:
262:
251:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
220:
216:
213:
212:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
196:
195:
194:
192:
183:
178:
161:
158:
155:
152:
151:
150:
146:
137:
134:
124:
121:
113:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
49:
48:
43:This article
41:
37:
32:
31:
19:
1838:
1831:
1824:
1817:
1803:
1796:
1771:(1): 59–84.
1768:
1764:
1754:
1729:
1725:
1718:
1688:(1): 35–57.
1685:
1681:
1675:
1642:
1638:
1631:
1622:
1616:
1575:
1571:
1565:
1546:
1540:
1521:
1515:
1506:
1502:
1492:
1451:
1447:
1441:
1400:
1396:
1390:
1379:. Retrieved
1367:
1342:. Retrieved
1335:the original
1324:
1315:
1309:
1290:
1284:
1265:
1230:
1226:
1216:
1191:
1187:
1165:. Retrieved
1160:
1151:
1108:
1104:
1094:
1059:
1049:
1006:
1002:
996:
978:
926:
922:
916:
888:
881:
862:
856:
848:
843:
825:
790:
786:
776:
757:
751:
731:
725:
706:
662:
658:
600:
596:
586:
553:
547:
522:
465:
461:
453:
449:
438:
430:
426:
417:
408:
391:
382:
373:
351:
342:
338:
334:
307:
302:
288:
286:
268:
265:
257:
248:
241:
234:
230:
226:
221:
214:
207:
202:
197:
187:
147:
143:
132:
131:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
69:"Debriefing"
64:
52:Please help
47:verification
44:
1509:(2): 46–52.
1344:December 8,
1167:9 September
1003:Behav Modif
238:counselors.
1849:Categories
1381:2020-04-19
496:References
414:Technology
388:Techniques
361:experiment
358:psychology
281:See also:
133:Debriefing
80:newspapers
1787:1044-8004
1746:0031-5826
1702:1050-8414
1659:0196-0644
1625:, US Navy
1592:0018-7208
1468:0018-7208
1417:0018-7208
1376:0017-8012
1249:0007-1250
1208:0748-8386
1125:1469-493X
1011:CiteSeerX
943:1559-2332
908:175298673
809:0026-4075
681:0026-4075
619:1559-2332
572:cite book
1710:51739430
1667:10459096
1608:22260709
1600:23516804
1484:22260709
1476:23516804
1433:22260709
1425:23516804
1273:Archived
1257:10974967
1143:31425615
1086:12076399
1041:44619491
1033:17179532
988:23658936
959:18613707
951:19088616
851:2009;20.
817:14719618
689:19216294
635:11105878
627:25710312
484:See also
261:analysis
172:Military
1134:6699654
1077:7032695
94:scholar
1785:
1744:
1708:
1700:
1665:
1657:
1606:
1598:
1590:
1553:
1528:
1482:
1474:
1466:
1431:
1423:
1415:
1374:
1297:
1255:
1247:
1206:
1141:
1131:
1123:
1084:
1074:
1039:
1031:
1013:
986:
957:
949:
941:
906:
896:
869:
815:
807:
764:
739:
733:Causes
713:
687:
679:
633:
625:
617:
560:
535:
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
1706:S2CID
1604:S2CID
1480:S2CID
1429:S2CID
1338:(pdf)
1037:S2CID
955:S2CID
835:(PDF)
631:S2CID
167:Types
140:Model
101:JSTOR
87:books
1783:ISSN
1742:ISSN
1698:ISSN
1663:PMID
1655:ISSN
1596:PMID
1588:ISSN
1551:ISBN
1526:ISBN
1472:PMID
1464:ISSN
1421:PMID
1413:ISSN
1372:ISSN
1346:2008
1295:ISBN
1253:PMID
1245:ISSN
1204:ISSN
1169:2017
1139:PMID
1121:ISSN
1109:2019
1082:PMID
1029:PMID
984:PMID
947:PMID
939:ISSN
904:OCLC
894:ISBN
867:ISBN
813:PMID
805:ISSN
762:ISBN
737:ISBN
711:ISBN
685:PMID
677:ISSN
623:PMID
615:ISSN
578:link
558:ISBN
533:ISBN
73:news
1773:doi
1734:doi
1690:doi
1647:doi
1580:doi
1456:doi
1405:doi
1235:doi
1231:176
1196:doi
1129:PMC
1113:doi
1072:PMC
1064:doi
1021:doi
931:doi
795:doi
791:168
667:doi
663:174
605:doi
352:In
56:by
1851::
1781:.
1769:17
1767:.
1763:.
1740:.
1730:61
1728:.
1704:.
1696:.
1686:10
1684:.
1661:.
1653:.
1643:34
1641:.
1602:.
1594:.
1586:.
1576:55
1574:.
1507:41
1505:.
1501:.
1478:.
1470:.
1462:.
1452:55
1450:.
1427:.
1419:.
1411:.
1401:55
1399:.
1370:.
1366:.
1354:^
1251:.
1243:.
1229:.
1225:.
1202:.
1192:14
1190:.
1177:^
1159:.
1137:.
1127:.
1119:.
1107:.
1103:.
1080:.
1070:.
1058:.
1035:.
1027:.
1019:.
1007:31
1005:.
967:^
953:.
945:.
937:.
925:.
902:.
811:.
803:.
789:.
785:.
697:^
683:.
675:.
661:.
657:.
643:^
629:.
621:.
613:.
601:10
599:.
595:.
574:}}
570:{{
531:.
504:^
431:A
305:.
1789:.
1775::
1748:.
1736::
1712:.
1692::
1669:.
1649::
1610:.
1582::
1559:.
1534:.
1486:.
1458::
1435:.
1407::
1384:.
1348:.
1303:.
1259:.
1237::
1210:.
1198::
1171:.
1145:.
1115::
1088:.
1066::
1043:.
1023::
990:.
961:.
933::
927:2
910:.
875:.
837:.
819:.
797::
770:.
745:.
719:.
691:.
669::
637:.
607::
580:)
566:.
541:.
529:1
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
