Knowledge

After-action review

Source πŸ“

89:"AARs are applicable to almost any event, clinical or otherwise, and whilst the emphasis is on learning after less than perfect events, AARs after successful experiences can also provide rich benefits. Prerequisite to the success of a formal AAR are a few key ingredients, including a trained β€˜conductor’, a suitable safe private environment, allocated time and the assumption of equality of everybody present. Every AAR follows the same structure with the conductor getting agreement for the ground rules at the outset and ensuring everyone is clear about the specific purpose of the AAR and the four apparently simple questions to be used." 54:
distinct from a post-mortem in its tight focus on participants' own actions; learning from the review is taken forward by the participants. Recommendations for others are not produced. AARs in larger operations can be cascaded in order to keep each level of the organization focused on its own performance within a particular event or project.
38:) is a technique for improving process and execution by analyzing the intended outcome and actual outcome of an action and identifying practices to sustain, and practices to improve or initiate, and then practicing those changes at the next iteration of the action AARs in the formal sense were originally developed by the 53:
in that it begins with a clear comparison of intended versus actual results achieved. An AAR is forward-looking, with the goal of informing future planning, preparation, and execution of similar actions. Assigning blame or issuing reprimands is antithetical to the purpose of an AAR. An AAR is
92:
AAR is actively used in a number of NHS organisations including Cambridge University Hospitals, Bedfordshire Hospitals and NEL Healthcare Consulting and has been recommended as an approach to be used in the new NHS Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, which "moves away from reactive and
85:
In 20011, Professor Aidan Hallighan, UCLH's Director of Education, wrote "Healthcare is dominated by the extreme, the unknown and the very improbable with high impact consequences, conditions that demand leadership, and yet we spend our time focusing on what we know and what we can control.
57:
Formal AAR meetings are normally run by a facilitator or trained 'AAR Conductor', and can be chronological reviews or tightly focused on a few key issues selected by the team leader. Short cycle informal AARs are typically run by a team leader or assistant and are very quick.
70:(NHS), AAR is increasingly used as a learning tool to promote patient safety and improve care, as outlined by Walker et al. 2012. In the UK and Europe other healthcare organisations, including pharmaceutical and medical technology businesses such as 135:
Cronin, Gerard; Andrews, Steven (2 June 2009). "After action reviews: a new model for learning: Gerard Cronin and Steven Andrews explain why after action reviews are an ideal model for healthcare professionals to analyse and learn from events".
81:
acted on the realization that bullying and blaming behaviours were impacting on safe and effective care. They commissioned the UCLH Education service to tackle the problem, and AAR was chosen as the tool to use.
86:
Educating staff on the use of After Action Review enables team working and cues behaviours through allowing an emotional mastery of the moment and learning after doing."
476: 78: 316:
Baird, Lloyd; Holland, Phil; Deacon, Sandra (March 1999). "Learning from action: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference".
375: 49:
An AAR occurs within a cycle of establishing the leader's intent, planning, preparation, action and review. An AAR is distinct from a
519: 42:. Formal AARs are used by all US military services and by many other non-US organizations. Their use has extended to business as a 359: 93:
hard-to-define thresholds for 'Serious Incident' investigation and towards a proactive approach to learning from incidents."
504: 17: 112: 102: 201:
Morrison, John E.; Meliza, Larry L. (1 July 1999). "Foundations of the After Action Review Process".
226: 67: 213: 161: 289:
Levy, Moria (19 July 2011). "Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss".
43: 8: 242:"Adaptation of the US Army's After-Action Review for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare" 107: 500:(Alternate Title: Army Training Circular 25-20: Leader's Guide to After-Action Reviews). 441:
Halligan, Aidan (October 2011). "Patient safety: culture eats strategy for breakfast".
418: 393: 271: 329: 180: 458: 423: 355: 263: 202: 153: 275: 149: 450: 413: 405: 325: 298: 253: 145: 454: 258: 241: 497: 205: 165: 302: 61: 513: 409: 462: 427: 392:
Walker, Judy; Andrews, Steve; Grewcock, Dave; Halligan, Aidan (July 2012).
267: 157: 71: 50: 39: 394:"Life in the slow lane: making hospitals safer, slowly but surely" 391: 179:
Darling, Marilyn; Parry, Charles; Moore, Joseph (July 2005).
376:"How can After Action Review (AAR) improve patient safety?" 62:
After action reviews in the British National Health Service
79:
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
181:"Learning in the Thick of Learning in the Thick of It" 74:, are beginning to roll out their own AAR programmes. 387: 385: 240:Sawyer, Taylor Lee; Deering, Shad (December 2013). 315: 477:"Patient Safety Incident Response Framework 2020" 178: 511: 382: 350:Beatty, Carol Anne (2016). "The How of Change". 352:Managing Change: The Easy, Hard and Tough Work 200: 239: 134: 77:In 2008, a group of senior leaders within 417: 257: 440: 398:Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 14: 512: 498:Leader's Guide to After-Action Reviews 349: 443:British Journal of Hospital Medicine 345: 343: 341: 339: 288: 130: 128: 505:After Action Review, September 2015 24: 496:Homeland Security Digital Library 113:Morbidity and mortality conference 103:List of established military terms 25: 531: 490: 336: 194: 125: 520:Military education and training 469: 434: 291:Journal of Knowledge Management 150:10.7748/en2009.06.17.3.32.c7090 368: 309: 282: 233: 172: 13: 1: 330:10.1016/S0090-2616(99)90027-X 118: 455:10.12968/hmed.2011.72.10.548 259:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31829ac85c 7: 96: 10: 536: 303:10.1108/13673271111151974 27:Structured review process 410:10.1258/jrsm.2012.120093 246:Simulation in Healthcare 66:In the United Kingdom's 318:Organizational Dynamics 68:National Health Service 221:Cite journal requires 44:knowledge management 108:After action report 32:after action review 18:After action review 482:. NHS. March 2020. 361:978-0-88886-568-7 16:(Redirected from 527: 484: 483: 481: 473: 467: 466: 438: 432: 431: 421: 389: 380: 379: 372: 366: 365: 347: 334: 333: 313: 307: 306: 286: 280: 279: 261: 237: 231: 230: 224: 219: 217: 209: 198: 192: 191: 189: 187: 176: 170: 169: 132: 21: 535: 534: 530: 529: 528: 526: 525: 524: 510: 509: 493: 488: 487: 479: 475: 474: 470: 449:(10): 548–549. 439: 435: 390: 383: 374: 373: 369: 362: 348: 337: 314: 310: 287: 283: 238: 234: 222: 220: 211: 210: 199: 195: 185: 183: 177: 173: 138:Emergency Nurse 133: 126: 121: 99: 64: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 533: 523: 522: 508: 507: 501: 492: 491:External links 489: 486: 485: 468: 433: 404:(7): 283–287. 381: 367: 360: 335: 308: 297:(4): 582–600. 281: 252:(6): 388–397. 232: 223:|journal= 193: 171: 123: 122: 120: 117: 116: 115: 110: 105: 98: 95: 63: 60: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 532: 521: 518: 517: 515: 506: 502: 499: 495: 494: 478: 472: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 437: 429: 425: 420: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 388: 386: 377: 371: 363: 357: 353: 346: 344: 342: 340: 331: 327: 323: 319: 312: 304: 300: 296: 292: 285: 277: 273: 269: 265: 260: 255: 251: 247: 243: 236: 228: 215: 207: 204: 197: 182: 175: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 131: 129: 124: 114: 111: 109: 106: 104: 101: 100: 94: 90: 87: 83: 80: 75: 73: 69: 59: 55: 52: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 471: 446: 442: 436: 401: 397: 370: 351: 324:(4): 19–32. 321: 317: 311: 294: 290: 284: 249: 245: 235: 214:cite journal 196: 184:. Retrieved 174: 144:(3): 32–35. 141: 137: 91: 88: 84: 76: 65: 56: 48: 35: 31: 29: 119:References 206:ADA368651 186:1 October 166:218273304 40:U.S. Army 514:Category 463:22041722 428:22843646 276:35341227 268:24096913 162:ProQuest 158:19552332 97:See also 51:de-brief 503:UNICEF 419:3407393 461:  426:  416:  358:  274:  266:  164:  156:  46:tool. 480:(PDF) 272:S2CID 459:PMID 424:PMID 356:ISBN 264:PMID 227:help 203:DTIC 188:2022 154:PMID 451:doi 414:PMC 406:doi 402:105 326:doi 299:doi 254:doi 146:doi 36:AAR 30:An 516:: 457:. 447:72 445:. 422:. 412:. 400:. 396:. 384:^ 354:. 338:^ 322:27 320:. 295:15 293:. 270:. 262:. 248:. 244:. 218:: 216:}} 212:{{ 160:. 152:. 142:17 140:. 127:^ 72:BD 465:. 453:: 430:. 408:: 378:. 364:. 332:. 328:: 305:. 301:: 278:. 256:: 250:8 229:) 225:( 208:. 190:. 168:. 148:: 34:( 20:)

Index

After action review
U.S. Army
knowledge management
de-brief
National Health Service
BD
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
List of established military terms
After action report
Morbidity and mortality conference


doi
10.7748/en2009.06.17.3.32.c7090
PMID
19552332
ProQuest
218273304
"Learning in the Thick of Learning in the Thick of It"
DTIC
ADA368651
cite journal
help
"Adaptation of the US Army's After-Action Review for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare"
doi
10.1097/SIH.0b013e31829ac85c
PMID
24096913
S2CID
35341227

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑