255:), had just been issued, and underrepresented minority (URM) science faculty noticed URM students increase among PhD recipients without a corresponding increase among recently hired professors. Data sets like the NDS, along with similar research available through the NSF, allowed URM faculty to track the progress of diversity efforts in the STEM fields. As noted by the Women's Institute for Policy Research, progress has been slow for under-represented women in the sciences.
271:
data, which had been available from NSF for decades. A new program to increase the representation of women and minorities among professors was implemented and PhD and MS research was based on data revealed by the NDS. The NDS were utilized by the
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Department of Energy, US Congress, Sloan Foundation, the National Organization for Women, universities, and many other organizations interested in diversity in academics.
165:
63:
22:
251:
from women and minorities. Furthermore, the
Surveys initially came at a time when these underrepresented groups were becoming concerned and vocal about perceived inequities in academia. At the time the surveys were initiated, the MIT Study of 1999, expressing the concerns of women scientists (including
339:
The NDS determined demographics of tenured / tenure track faculty in a discipline at pertinent departments of universities, ranked by the
National Science Foundation( NSF) according to research funding expenditures in that discipline. The FY2002 data were the first such data published, disaggregated
270:
The Nelson
Diversity Surveys made it possible for the first time to know the level and rate of faculty diversification, disaggregated by race, by rank, and by gender. Researchers in the 15 areas of science surveyed used these disaggregated faculty data, in order to compare against analogous student
250:
during fiscal years (FY) 2002, 2005, 2007, and 2012 through the
Diversity in Science Association. These surveys were each complete populations, rather than samples. Consequently, the Surveys quantified characteristics of the faculty which had never been revealed previously, drawing great attention
335:
FY2003). Data were collected about race/ethnicity, rank, and gender, and are complete populations, rather than samples. Consequently, they accurately reveal the small number or complete absence of underrepresented groups. Data for all disciplines were obtained in a relatively short time and by a
258:
The NDS quantified the degree to which women and minorities are underrepresented on science and engineering faculties at research universities. Because the surveys were complete populations and disaggregated, the degree of underrepresentation was revealed, in ways it had never been revealed
344:). In some cases, slightly fewer than 100 schools were ranked by NSF for a discipline. Data were collected by surveying department chairs, who provided their own department's faculty data, disaggregated by gender, by race/ethnicity, and by rank.
340:
by gender, by race, and by rank, about faculty at 50 research universities in each of 14 science and engineering disciplines. The FY2005 survey was expanded to include 100 departments in each of 15 disciplines (adding
242:) are a collection of data sets that quantify the representation of women and minorities among professors, by science and engineering discipline, at research universities. They consist of four data sets compiled by
279:
During 2001 to 2003, Nelson surveyed department chairs in order to collect headcounts of tenured and tenure-track university faculty members of each of 14 science and engineering disciplines (
336:
consistent protocol and are therefore comparable across this relatively large number of disciplines. This entire data set became known as the FY2002 Nelson
Diversity Surveys (NDS).
267:
departments. Analogous surveys were carried out for top 100 departments in each of 15 science and engineering disciplines in fiscal years (FY) 2005, 2007 and 2012.
379:"Additional Resources - nsf.gov - Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering - NCSES - US National Science Foundation (NSF)"
428:"NSF Award Abstract # 0545361 ADVANCE Leadership Award: Determining and Using National Science Faculty Demographics to Empower Women and Guide Solutions"
259:
previously. For example, the FY 2002 survey showed that there were no Black, Hispanic, or Native
American tenured or tenure track women faculty in 50
626:
403:
127:
99:
80:
35:
572:
631:
456:
547:
106:
113:
221:
203:
146:
95:
49:
347:
The NDS were funded by Nelson, the Sloan
Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation, NSF, and NIH.
181:
174:
84:
263:
departments. It also revealed that there were no black or Native
American assistant professors in the top 50
185:
41:
505:
120:
252:
606:
533:
487:
378:
73:
573:"A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities"
579:
460:
304:
300:
247:
593:
520:
474:
427:
292:
8:
312:
296:
308:
260:
501:
180:
It may require cleanup to comply with
Knowledge's content policies, particularly
620:
341:
243:
441:
288:
328:
404:"New Analysis Shows Slow Progress for Women Faculty of Color in STEM"
332:
320:
316:
280:
264:
62:
324:
284:
365:
A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT
173:
A major contributor to this article appears to have a
87:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
367:. MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1999.
618:
570:
454:
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
548:"Surveying Diversity in STEM Disciplines"
222:Learn how and when to remove this message
204:Learn how and when to remove this message
147:Learn how and when to remove this message
619:
627:Higher education in the United States
401:
158:
85:adding citations to reliable sources
56:
15:
13:
14:
643:
31:This article has multiple issues.
246:, Professor of Chemistry at the
184:. Please discuss further on the
163:
61:
20:
632:Women in science and technology
72:needs additional citations for
39:or discuss these issues on the
564:
540:
494:
448:
434:
420:
395:
371:
357:
274:
1:
350:
442:"Nature: Academic Diversity"
7:
571:Donna Nelson (2006-01-06).
506:National Science Foundation
455:Donna Nelson (2006-01-06).
10:
648:
457:"Nelson Diversity Surveys"
96:"Nelson Diversity Surveys"
552:The Analytical Scientist
236:Nelson Diversity Surveys
601:Cite journal requires
580:University of Oklahoma
528:Cite journal requires
482:Cite journal requires
461:University of Oklahoma
305:mechanical engineering
301:electrical engineering
248:University of Oklahoma
502:"ADVANCE at a Glance"
182:neutral point of view
293:chemical engineering
81:improve this article
402:IWPR (2013-11-21).
325:biological sciences
313:political science
297:civil engineering
232:
231:
224:
214:
213:
206:
177:with its subject.
157:
156:
149:
131:
54:
639:
611:
610:
604:
599:
597:
589:
587:
586:
577:
568:
562:
561:
559:
558:
544:
538:
537:
531:
526:
524:
516:
514:
513:
498:
492:
491:
485:
480:
478:
470:
468:
467:
452:
446:
445:
438:
432:
431:
424:
418:
417:
415:
414:
399:
393:
392:
390:
389:
375:
369:
368:
361:
309:computer science
261:computer science
227:
220:
209:
202:
198:
195:
189:
175:close connection
167:
166:
159:
152:
145:
141:
138:
132:
130:
89:
65:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
647:
646:
642:
641:
640:
638:
637:
636:
617:
616:
615:
614:
602:
600:
591:
590:
584:
582:
575:
569:
565:
556:
554:
546:
545:
541:
529:
527:
518:
517:
511:
509:
500:
499:
495:
483:
481:
472:
471:
465:
463:
453:
449:
440:
439:
435:
426:
425:
421:
412:
410:
400:
396:
387:
385:
377:
376:
372:
363:
362:
358:
353:
277:
228:
217:
216:
215:
210:
199:
193:
190:
179:
168:
164:
153:
142:
136:
133:
90:
88:
78:
66:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
645:
635:
634:
629:
613:
612:
603:|journal=
563:
539:
530:|journal=
493:
484:|journal=
447:
433:
419:
394:
370:
355:
354:
352:
349:
276:
273:
230:
229:
212:
211:
194:September 2021
171:
169:
162:
155:
154:
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
644:
633:
630:
628:
625:
624:
622:
608:
595:
581:
574:
567:
553:
549:
543:
535:
522:
507:
503:
497:
489:
476:
462:
458:
451:
444:. 2007-06-13.
443:
437:
429:
423:
409:
405:
398:
384:
380:
374:
366:
360:
356:
348:
345:
343:
342:earth science
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
272:
268:
266:
262:
256:
254:
253:Nancy Hopkins
249:
245:
241:
237:
226:
223:
208:
205:
197:
187:
183:
178:
176:
170:
161:
160:
151:
148:
140:
129:
126:
122:
119:
115:
112:
108:
105:
101:
98: –
97:
93:
92:Find sources:
86:
82:
76:
75:
70:This article
68:
64:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
594:cite journal
583:. Retrieved
566:
555:. Retrieved
551:
542:
521:cite journal
510:. Retrieved
508:. 2012-07-11
496:
475:cite journal
464:. Retrieved
450:
436:
422:
411:. Retrieved
407:
397:
386:. Retrieved
382:
373:
364:
359:
346:
338:
278:
269:
257:
244:Donna Nelson
239:
235:
233:
218:
200:
191:
172:
143:
134:
124:
117:
110:
103:
91:
79:Please help
74:verification
71:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
289:mathematics
275:Methodology
621:Categories
585:2010-10-11
557:2021-09-29
512:2014-03-11
466:2010-10-11
413:2021-09-30
388:2021-09-30
351:References
329:psychology
107:newspapers
36:improve it
333:astronomy
321:economics
317:sociology
281:chemistry
265:chemistry
186:talk page
137:June 2020
42:talk page
283:FY2001,
383:nsf.gov
285:physics
121:scholar
331:, and
123:
116:
109:
102:
94:
576:(PDF)
128:JSTOR
114:books
607:help
534:help
488:help
408:IWPR
234:The
100:news
240:NDS
83:by
623::
598::
596:}}
592:{{
578:.
550:.
525::
523:}}
519:{{
504:.
479::
477:}}
473:{{
459:.
406:.
381:.
327:,
323:,
319:,
315:,
311:,
307:,
303:,
299:,
295:,
291:,
287:,
45:.
609:)
605:(
588:.
560:.
536:)
532:(
515:.
490:)
486:(
469:.
430:.
416:.
391:.
238:(
225:)
219:(
207:)
201:(
196:)
192:(
188:.
150:)
144:(
139:)
135:(
125:·
118:·
111:·
104:·
77:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
